Bluff called

By Doug Powers  •  April 30, 2009 09:04 AM

President Obama said the following at a town hall meeting/100th day in office sermon:

“Those of you who are watching certain news channels on which I’m not very popular, and you see folks waving tea bags around, Obama said, “let me just remind them that I am happy to have a serious conversation about how we are going to cut our health care costs down over the long term, how we are going to stabilize Social Security.”

Strange that Obama could so easily reference something he was unaware of, but nonetheless, tea party organizers are taking the president up on the offer (they say “accepted his offer” because “called his bluff” sounds too harsh for hope):

The National Leadership Team of the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition today accepted President Obama`s invitation “to have a serious conversation about how we are going to cut our health care costs down over the long term, how we are going to stabilize Social Security.”

The invitation was extended by the President at a Town Hall Meeting held in Arnold, Missouri today. Michael Patrick Leahy, a member of the National Leadership Team of the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition, said “We want to broaden the scope to address the President`s runaway march to socialist-statism, and the rampant across the board irresponsible spending he is promoting with his $787 Billion Stimulus Plan and his $1 Trillion Annual Deficit, his takeover of General Motors, Chrysler and the Banks.”

The rest of that press release is here.

Of course, the president’s “invitation” was of the “kiss my royal butt” variety, so don’t expect an actual meeting to come from any of this.

You’ll notice how the entire tea party movement is being dismissed as a Fox News stunt, which anyone who’s followed this since the beginning knows is a complete pile of Pelosi. As a matter of fact, didn’t this whole thing, at least in part, get rolling because of Santelli’s “rant” on CNBC?

One frustration for the left that lingers from the Tax Day tea parties is that when the liberal sock-puppet media did show up, they were only fishing for wackos to discredit the tea party movement and instead ended up providing everyone with laughable examples of their own bias.

Thanks though to the president for helping boost attendance on July 4th even higher than it would have otherwise been.

Posted in: Barack Obama, Tea Party

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Doug Powers: Bluff called - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
  2. Obama, Was Janeane Garofalo Too Busy to Mock Law-Abiding Americans, So You Gave It Your Best Shot? | Karl Rove Video on 100 Days of Obama « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  3. Obama’s Many Misstatements | NEOAVATARA
  4. Jules Crittenden » 101 Days!
  5. What tea Parties? So Obama LIES… AGAIN! - The Angry White Guy
  6. HOMELAND SECURITY UPDATE - April Fool’s Day - Mail Order Tea Party « Designated Conservative
  7. CNN/CENSOR UPDATE: Michigan’s “Chicago Tea Party” « Designated Conservative
  8. Obama Slurs Fellow Americans Yet Again » Pirate’s Cove
  9. Right Wing News
  10. Got Tea? Round 2 - Tea Party Day July 4th! Update: Obama takes shot at tea parties - invitation accepted « Jim Blazsik
  11. The Radio Patriot
  12. Conservative Democrats said they would vote for their district’s Republican candidate. « Goodtimepolitics
  13. Obama has largely done the fun part of governing: promising people free stuff « Peace and Freedom Promises
  14. GayPatriot » Tea Party Success: Libertarian Ideas Still Resonate
  15. Time for Tea Partiers to Raise the Stakes « The Right Knight
  16. Tea Partiers Accept Obama Invitation for ‘Serious Conversation’ | The Great Illuminator
  17. Hard Starboard
  18. On Today » Blog Archive » “If you don’t like me, well, then you’re wrong”
  19. Obama - from being “unaware” of April 15th tea parties, to talking them down on his 100th day in office! July 4th, 2009 tea parties are on! | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  20. Hey, Mr. President, Here’s Why I Went To a Tea Party (hint: nothing to do with FoxNews) « Quick Daily Hits (Politics and Such)
  21. Obama’s M.O. with Americans who disagree with him: ridicule - Saul Alinsky anyone? « Jim Blazsik
  22. President Obama Sneers At Tea Partiers « Jane Q. Republican
  23. Obama Sneers At Us « Asheville “Tea Party” Protest
  24. silent E speaks » Blog Archive » The Invitation….
  25. Nationwide Tea Party Coalition Accepts Obama's Tepid Invitation | Political Lipskip
  26. Liar, Liar? « Tai-Chi Policy
  27. Is Christopher Buckley Legally Retarded? « DONE (Democrats Over Nominating Elitists)
  28. Put Up Or Shut Up, Mr. President « Justbkuz
  29. Why So Glib, Mr. Obama? | shyspeak.net
  30. TEA PARTY DIRECTORIES ALL-IN-ONE…& Facts (update 4/30/09) « FactReal
  31. ShortsandPants - Your Daily Malkin
  32. Obama Suddenly Aware Of Tea Parties « Beltway Snark
  33. Obama Suddenly Aware Of Tea Parties « Beltway Snark
  34. Worm is the word… « DaTechguy’s Blog
  35. Insane douchenozzle Michael Patrick Leahy continues to imagine, accept White House invite « Teablogging

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #691461
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, chapoutier said:
    No no. It would have had to read:

    Presidential approval rating drops 56.7 points from highest in latest poll.

    Hey, you asked.

    Where were you the last eight years? They pointed out every drop in his approval and always mentioned the fact that his high was in the nineties and how he squandered it.

  2. #691462
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, Ragspierre said:

    And, Aloha, I’d have to cry foul over mixing numbers from one poll with another.

    Not that the MSM would have any scruples…

  3. #691463
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, Salt said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, John Deaux said:

    Makes you wonder if it’s a group of “lifelong republicans” that will debate Obama and lose handily and then concede they were wrong to doubt him.

    Arlen Specter switched parties too early for the “debate”.

  4. #691464
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, bansharia said:

    B-cat and a few others,
    We are on the same page.
    If these self annointed leaders of the tea party movement start willy nilly making declarations on the behalf of attendees…not good.
    I would caution them two things:
    1. You do not speak for everyone. If you are going to actually meeet with him speak for yourself do not claim you speak for the whole.
    2. By meeting with obambi on these very narrow issues, which are HIS priorities for the next 100 days, like it or not you tacitly indicate what the tea parties were protesting are resolved issues lets move on to this now.

  5. #691468
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, chapoutier said:

    Rags,

    Just to be clear, I am making no judgments as to the veracity or usefulness of Gallup’s numbers, or the validity of Obama’s approval ratings as compared to other presidents. I am just pointing out I have no clue where the Washington Times purports to get their figure that they use as their basis.

  6. #691469
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    I wonder that myself. If someone has formed a coalition without the backing of the people who ARE the grass roots, then they are certainly assuming a lot, aren’t they? Like, who asked them to be our voice? And who needs them? This is almost like stealing a trademark or something. I resent it.

    Kiss the tea party concept bah bye if that is the case and it sure sounds like it doesnt it!!!

  7. #691471
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:38 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, John Deaux said:Makes you wonder if it’s a group of “lifelong republicans” that will debate Obama and lose handily and then concede they were wrong to doubt him.

    I am just highly suspicious of anyone who presumes to speak for the tea parties. There are a lot of folks who would do that, and would screw things up. Kinda like politicians trying to horn in. It is going to be hard to keep the movement “pure”, but we have to keep trying.

  8. #691472
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:38 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Chaps:

    Agreed…and the lack of support for their assertions is certainly a red flag.

  9. #691475
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    it is one thing to streamline the coordination it is a WHOLE NUTHA thing to say I will meet with POTUS on YOUR behalf whoaaa there put the brakes fella
    ;)

  10. #691477
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, bansharia said:
    Happy,
    it is one thing to streamline the coordination it is a WHOLE NUTHA thing to say I will meet with POTUS on YOUR behalf whoaaa there put the brakes fella

    I absolutely agree!!

  11. #691482
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:45 pm, bansharia said:

    utoh I must have pissed someone off my last post was rejected due to me posting too fast!! lolo
    I shall try again:
    Why don’t we have votes AT the tea parties ( nothing online ) as to what
    are top issues etc?

  12. #691481
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, chapoutier said:

    I appoint myself leader of the tea party movement.

    In an effort to keep this movement pure, I will purge it of all so- called “green” teas. Also, any tea with a liberal wussy name like “chamomile” need not apply.

    What? That ISN’T what the tea party movement is about?

  13. #691484
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, bansharia said:

    Chap
    MWAHAHAHA good one ;)

  14. #691485
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    And who is this guy, “Michael Patrick Leahy, a member of the National Leadership Team of the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition”?? I thought Patrick Leahy was a liberal senator. Isn’t that name suspicious? I think this man needs to identify himself a bit more and tell the people of the tea party movement how he has come to “represent” us. Kinda “brassy”, wouldn’t you say?

  15. #691490
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    What? That ISN’T what the tea party movement is about?

    You are probably closer to the truth than the MSM has come!! They think it is an anti-CNN, anti-government movement. So I guess your definition is as good as any! Ha!

  16. #691496
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, bansharia said:

    happy,
    poke around the website specially this:
    http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/about.php

    why 36 who decided that? and why does the link go back to chicago?

  17. #691499
    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, lgm said:

    happyscrapper said (#165):

    The liberals are continually shooting themselves in the foot and it is becoming more and more evident to the public.

    Not really. Obama’s ratings are holding pretty steady, despite what some in this thread are saying.

    We just need an attractive, articulate person to stand up and refute what is going on, in a strong, unwavering voice.

    The GOP does attractive and unwavering pretty well. Reagan, Bush, Palin, Cantor. Looks and voice are not what the GOP lacks.

    Someone who is not afraid to get out there and in their faces, like Rush does.

    Conservatives surely don’t have an “In your face” deficit either.

    If this person is conservative enough, and articulate enough, we might have a chance.

    You need a message that makes sense. It can’t be “taxes = socialism” or that global warming is made up. You might think so but the vast majority of Americans don’t.

    I don’t think Sarah Palin is the answer. She has been marginalized discredited and is too polarizing now.

    Sarah Palin lacks credibility because she was proven to be a hypocritical lying know nothing (is this too harsh?).

  18. #691501
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:00 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Any attempt to hi-jack, divert, un-track, shang-hi, or otherwise mess with the TEA Party concept has to be ANTICIPATED.

    Power-players know the game.

    They play it hard.

    People need to be aware. They need to be forearmed.

  19. #691502
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    look at the banner of the website
    it says “we have no generals”, yet they have just anointed themselves generals!
    and what is with the creepy disclaimer of this leahy guy at bottom of list:
    http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/about.php

    Hey Doug do you know these people you posted this?

  20. #691503
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm, happyscrapper said:

    From the website…”The National Leadership Team is an advisory group, that provides public commentary on the direction of the Tea Party Movement. This group currently consists of 26 members. Over time, will expand to 36 or more”

    What the…?? Who are these people? They really have appointed themselves, haven’t they? And for Michael Patrick Leahy to agree to meet with the president on behalf of the Tea Parties is presumptuous and UNACCEPTABLE!

    Michelle Malkin…what say you???

  21. #691504
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:02 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Sarah Palin lacks credibility because she was proven to be a hypocritical lying know nothing (is this too harsh?).

    Only if a stupid lying statement is considered harsh…

  22. #691505
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, flmom said:

    Sarah Palin lacks credibility because she was proven to be a hypocritical lying know nothing (is this too harsh?).

    Harsh. no. Dishonest, yes.
    You were actually sounding half intelligent, then you lost me at the last sentence.

  23. #691506
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, lgm said:

    Mostly gibberish.

  24. #691510
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:04 pm, Speakup said:

    Early on in life, the narcissist learns to disguise his socially-unacceptable indifference as benevolence, equanimity, cool-headedness, composure, or superiority. “It is not that I don’t care about others” – he shrugs off his critics – “I am simply more level-headed, more resilient, more composed under pressure … They mistake my equanimity for apathy.”

  25. #691511
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:04 pm, flmom said:

    You beat me, Rags.

  26. #691512
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:04 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    pssst Doug posted this not MM

  27. #691515
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, bjc said:

    Happyscrapper:You mention about someone stepping forward per Rush to speak for conservatives against the oncoming socialist policies; Here is my take:
    **It will be a number of voices as it is too early for interest in 2012.
    **They will be GOP members, like it or not, as third party is a non-starter.
    **Most successful will be those not currently in D.C. or with D.C. baggage(Newt).
    **Best traits would be fiscally conservative and socially center-right.
    **And among them should be Romney, Palin, Sanford, Jindal, Perry, Pence, and DeMint.
    **And whoever among them that promotes the Fair Tax to blowout the logjam of corruption that currently resides in D.C. will have the people on their side.
    **I would be well pleased with Sanford.

  28. #691517
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:08 pm, bansharia said:

    Speak,
    well obambi has a gift or so he says ;)

  29. #691519
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:04 pm, bansharia said:
    Happy,
    pssst Doug posted this not MM

    Oh…that’s right. Sorry about that. I would like Doug’s opinion, but I would like to hear what Michelle has to say about this too.

  30. #691520
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, sonofdy said:

    LGM: When you keep slanting your polls so that you ask the questions of more and more democrats than anyone else, you will get a steady poll number. Trust me. Americans are beginning to see through obamas lies.

    Like global warming.

  31. #691522
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Idiot blathered:
    It can’t be “taxes = socialism” or that global warming is made up. You might think so but the vast majority of Americans don’t.

    Nobody ever said taxes = socialism.
    Man caused Global warming IS made up.

    vast majority of Americans

    Majorities = truth? World = flat mean anything to you? The majority of Germans thought Hitler was right too. Shall I go on and pick you apart or shall I allow us all to share?

    P.S. the majority of us think you are an idiot.

  32. #691524
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, jangar said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 3:19 pm, bansharia said:
    Who are these people running this coalition and who appointed them?

    Trolls co-opting the movement so Obama has the easy advantage should a debate actually happen? Nahhhhh…..sounds too McCainish.

    What pisses me off is that libs still call it ‘teabagging’, and continue to characterize it as opposition against spending, when it’s a whole lot more than that!

  33. #691526
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, sonofdy said:
  34. #691527
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:13 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    looks like we hit too close to home, the thread is being tossed red herrings to discuss….

  35. #691528
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:13 pm, Ragspierre said:

    pssst Doug posted this not MM

    But does not the god of threads hear all prayers…

  36. #691531
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, sonofdy said:

    bansharia: The global ice chart usualy expells lgm for a while. Its like garlic to a vampire. Obama will never enter an arena where he is not worshiped. Someone might ask him a real, unscripted question. We can’t have that now can we???

  37. #691534
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, bansharia said:

    Jang,
    some guy who appointed himself leader who has a disclaimer to boot!!
    its laughable:
    http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/about.php

    can’t you just see him picking out a tie looking in mirror and mumbling ” I am ready for my closeup mister axelrod “

  38. #691537
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:18 pm, chapoutier said:

    LGM: When you keep slanting your polls so that you ask the questions of more and more democrats than anyone else, you will get a steady poll number. Trust me. Americans are beginning to see through obamas lies.

    When more people identify themselves as Democrat rather than Republican, it is only natural that more dems will answer the poll.

  39. #691541
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:20 pm, bansharia said:

    Rags,
    no idea she said she is busy but yes in theory Doug or any other person who posts on her blog she is answerable for.

    Sons,
    don’t care about obami or lgm. some idiot is trying to hijack the tea party.
    love ya anyway ;)

  40. #691543
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:21 pm, sonofdy said:

    chapoutier: if you say so.

  41. #691544
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, sonofdy said:

    bansharia: Are the guys on that link actualy tea party people?

  42. #691552
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Bans;

    this is to be EXPECTED. It has to be EFFECTIVELY responded to.

    This is the Bigs, as they say.

  43. #691553
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, jangar said:

    “I am ready for my closeup mister axelrod”

    KGB-like

  44. #691555
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, bansharia said:

    Son,
    They say they coordinated all by themselves the various tea parties listed by their names it seems.
    I have no idea who they are why this one guy fancies himself spokesman for everyone who attended why he needs a disclaimer etc. it is all very creepy to me.

  45. #691562
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, bansharia said:

    Rags,
    totally agree.
    mark me down as HEY bonehead you don’t speak for me ;)

  46. #691563
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10569713

    off topic but this is the type of healthcare system libs are aiming for.

    off topic again. I have 2 sleeping pregnant women in my front room snoring away. Its funny.

  47. #691564
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, jangar said:

    This is the Bigs, as they say.

    Like a damn mean cat that done left the bag. I wouldn’t doubt for a minute that it’s all a hoax in an attempt to further downplay the anger and frustration foaming over in every city, town and burb.

  48. #691566
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:31 pm, Ragspierre said:

    When more people identify themselves as Democrat rather than Republican, it is only natural that more dems will answer the poll.

    No, hardly.

    How THAT data was obtained would have to be explored.

    Plus, we are likely not talking about seven point spreads. We are likely talking about 2-3% with a margin of error, and that seeks to bifurcate the population along two party lines, making no provision for others (at least in that data).

  49. #691569
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, jangar said:

    I have 2 sleeping pregnant women in my front room snoring away. Its funny.

    Off Topic: I’m Sorry. Oh, and how are those twins cooking?

  50. #691575
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:

    Off Topic: I’m Sorry. Oh, and how are those twins cooking?

    33 weeks. Both my wife and my sister are now on bed rest so I am a busy boy. The twins almost came while I was at BNCOC.

  51. #691577
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Like a damn mean cat that done left the bag. I wouldn’t doubt for a minute that it’s all a hoax in an attempt to further downplay the anger and frustration foaming over in every city, town and burb.

    Look, I know it’s a movie…

    not reality.

    But watch Meet John Doe. It is a great parable for what we are experiencing.

  52. #691578
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, bansharia said:

    Son,
    OT vid them and send to AFV!
    are the drooling too? extra points for that
    all kidding aside how Blessed you are.
    are you sposed to be making them dinner and yammering with us instead?
    get crackin!!!

  53. #691580
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, sonofdy said:

    sister = my wifes sister. Same thing really.

  54. #691582
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, sonofdy said:

    ban Its 2:30 here. Besides they like making dinner. It helps them to avoid going crazy. Its about all they can do.

  55. #691584
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:36 pm, bansharia said:

    OT
    When polls are done people are called BASED on thier party affiliation there is no such thing as outta the blue they say they are so it becomes skewed.

  56. #691589
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:38 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, bansharia said:
    Son,
    They say they coordinated all by themselves the various tea parties listed by their names it seems.
    I have no idea who they are why this one guy fancies himself spokesman for everyone who attended why he needs a disclaimer etc. it is all very creepy to me.

    I’m kinda creeped out too. The website makes it look like they are a well-organized, up and running group that speaks for the tea parties. Who gave them that authority?? I definitely think Michelle needs to check into this group and find out where they came from and what their plans are. They may just be a harmless group who thinks they are doing a job for the tea parties. It is a fact that there was a lot of networking being done at the rallies, and maybe someone just picked up the ball and ran with it. I just don’t like the idea of a small group of people thinking they speak for the rest of us. That is what elections are for and no one elected anyone for that! They are being very presumptuous.

  57. #691590
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:38 pm, jangar said:

    off topic but this is the type of healthcare system libs are aiming for.

    Not really off topic…it has become a lib issue, and one that the Bamster wants to discuss with Der Teabagger.

    And how does that socialized medicine work? I don’t have the actual numbers, but aren’t the swine flu deaths in Mexico around 150+ vs. 1 in the US?

  58. #691594
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, bansharia said:

    oh boy a simple yahoo search shows this guy to be a very active self horn tooter:
    http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=michael+patrick+leahy&fr=yfp-t-305&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8

  59. #691597
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:40 pm, chapoutier said:

    The website makes it look like they are a well-organized, up and running group that speaks for the tea parties.

    Actually, I think that site makes them look amatuerish.

  60. #691600
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:
    Both my wife and my sister are now on bed rest so I am a busy boy.

    I am certain this is why beer was invented.

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, sonofdy said:
    It helps them to avoid going crazy.

    Oh, and that too! ;)

  61. #691605
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    I guess the “We have no generals” quote in their header really meant to say “We have no generals (only a self appointed “National Leadership Team”).

  62. #691609
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    And how does that socialized medicine work? I don’t have the actual numbers, but aren’t the swine flu deaths in Mexico around 150+ vs. 1 in the US?

    And the one death in the U.S. was a Mexican child who was visiting relatives in TX, but caught the flu in Mexico and just happened to die here. So I don’t think that should even count as a U.S. death.

  63. #691610
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, bansharia said:

    Chap,
    isnt that a hoot!!
    we need a eric cartman RESPECT MY AUTHORITAY sound ;)

    Dear you aint my leader Michael Patrick Leahy,
    you are FIRED.
    love,B

  64. #691611
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Also the poor kid had other health issues, according to Texas reports.

  65. #691613
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, bansharia said:
    oh boy a simple yahoo search shows this guy to be a very active self horn tooter:
    http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=michael+patrick+leahy&fr=yfp-t-305&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8

    Oh, my gosh!! He is a blowhard, isn’t he? Somehow, we have to prevent him from hijacking the movement. It would make us look very very bad! We don’t need blowhard, self-appointed spokespeople!

  66. #691618
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    yes wasn’t that a cute and cuddly euphamism “just visiting” so there you have it all illegals are “just visiting” now. hacks and slacks!!

  67. #691620
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, jangar said:

    And how does that socialized medicine work? I don’t have the actual numbers, but aren’t the swine flu deaths in Mexico around 150+ vs. 1 in the US?

    I digress…Obama will see this as further proof that America is mean and not compassionate to the rest of the world. We should be dying like all other nations, etc.

  68. #691623
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, sonofdy said:

    And how does that socialized medicine work?

    It works. Barely.

    Its basicaly the lowest bidder approach. EVERYTHING is the lowest possiable cost and quaility to save the government money.

  69. #691625
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, bansharia said:

    happy,
    I just sent him an email saying you don’t speak for me etc.
    http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/contact.php

  70. #691626
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, sonofdy said:

    Which is why there is now a healthy private hospital system in New Zealand to back up the socialist state health system. A good job there includes health insurance so you can AVOID the state run system.

  71. #691629
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Oh, my gosh!! He is a blowhard, isn’t he? Somehow, we have to prevent him from hijacking the movement. It would make us look very very bad! We don’t need blowhard, self-appointed spokespeople!

    Now, THIS guy you CAN sue. He should be slapped with an injunction NOW, and sued.

  72. #691631
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://www.southerncross.co.nz/

    BTW you still pay for the socialist system in your taxes.

  73. #691633
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, bansharia said:

    This is TOO creepy.
    This guy makes a website that links back to himself in chicago, has disclaimers, claims to speak for everyone who attends tea parties ETC ETC.
    cramming a wetblanket into his self promoting horn.

  74. #691636
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, bansharia said:

    Rags,
    please expound on that.

  75. #691640
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:59 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Its basicaly the lowest bidder approach. EVERYTHING is the lowest possiable cost and quaility to save the government money.

    It is worse than that. All the wrong incentives are in place. It becomes largely a monopoly system, with all the bad stuff that entails, but with the added feature that even a monopoly enterprise is more responsive to consumers than a govt. bureaucracy.

    I could go on…and on…and on…

  76. #691645
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, bansharia said:

    Rags what?
    I meant please expound on this fool should be sued ;)

  77. #691646
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    rags, I know, I have lived it. My grandmother walked arround fr 2 years on a shattered hip because of it.

    The wait for emergency heart surgery in New Zealand last year? 45 days.

    Thats EMERGENCY surgery.

  78. #691655
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Rags,
    please expound on that.

    I don’t know the law of Illinois, but I would think they have causes of action for slander and libel that are not too unlike my jurisdiction. There are also causes for using people’s images or words without their permission, along privacy lines.

    There are Federal statutes that have parallels, and that would allow people in other states to file against him.

    An injunction is a court order that prohibits or commands conduct. In this case, he could be ordered by a court to immediately take down his web-site pending the outcome of a law suit.

    Some of the causes I mention, and virtually any I can think of from my jurisdiction, are weak on these facts. Sometimes that doesn’t matter in practical terms. If he can’t afford a defense, you win. That can be an example of a “good” frivolous law suit.

  79. #691656
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, bansharia said:

    OT,
    Son so they dont have hoverrounds in NZ I take it? called once to find out the cost of those dang things you could buy a car for less, but the taxpayers wouldn’t pick up the tab!
    Prayers to your Gram how the heck does someone walk on a shattered hip? my gosh

  80. #691662
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, bansharia said:

    Rags,
    Are you one of them lawyers types? if so get on that you need a name to use, use mine.
    tossing you a cyber 2bits to put you on retainer ;)
    All kidding aside everyone who went to a tea party that doesn’t want this guy to speak for them needs to email him and say as much:
    http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/contact.php

  81. #691670
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, happy2behere said:

    The strength of the tea party movement is in its lack of a specific leader and its appeal to regular tax-paying folks. Its different from a grass roots movement in that it does not come from ‘everyman’, which includes people on the dole and their enablers.

    Self-appointed leaders need not apply.

  82. #691683
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, bansharia said:
    happy,
    I just sent him an email saying you don’t speak for me etc.
    http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/contact.php

    I just wrote to him also and asked by what authority does he presume to speak for me? Let’s see if he answers.

  83. #691687
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Rags,
    Are you one of them lawyers types? if so get on that you need a name to use, use mine.
    tossing you a cyber 2bits to put you on retainer

    That’ll get you a cyber-suit…which sounds WAY cooler than it is…

    I’m not the guy to do this, but there are lots of others. The place is lousy with lawyers…

    No kidding, though, this is to be PREDICTED and FOUGHT.

  84. #691692
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The legitimate TEA Party needs to put together a legal team anyhow. I’d volunteer to be a cog in that machine.

    It would have LOTS of uses, one of them to police this kind of exploitation.

  85. #691693
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    after further digging thru the yahoo search:
    http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=michael+patrick+leahy&fr=yfp-t-305&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
    it seems he is involved with pajamas media pals with hugh hewitt etc.
    this is very bad news.
    I shall shut up for awhile have been repromanded for posting too much.

  86. #691709
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:29 pm, sonofdy said:

    Prayers to your Gram how the heck does someone walk on a shattered hip? my gosh

    They pin it together enough so you can walk, sort of, then once your turn comes up they replace the hip. Here in the states they just replace the hip. The government doesn’t pay for the powered chairs unless you are crippled. Hobbling arround in pain doesn’t count.

  87. #691718
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, jangar said:

    save the government money

    Since when is the gubmint worried about where the money is coming from?

    Isn’t abortion one of Bella Pelosi’s recent suggestions to lower the cost?

  88. #691719
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I shall shut up for awhile have been repromanded for posting too much.

    I got one of those too! I wasn’t sure what it was. So MM doesn’t want us to monopolize the conversation? Ha!!

  89. #691725
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, bansharia said:

    well just called him.
    oddly when I asked him if he could tell me why is it he feels he is the national spokesman for tea party movement he got chilly and said to send him my contact information.
    made some silly excuse that he is about to start taping a show blah blah.
    This guy is no good and if the powers who be that run this blog don’t like me saying so be it.

  90. #691731
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:38 pm, bansharia said:

    Happy,
    we are both rightfully steamed about this guy but he has jammie connections, who knows if we were trashing obambi would we get?

  91. #691732
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And, Aloha, I’d have to cry foul over mixing numbers from one poll with another.

    The Presidential numbers are from the Gallup site Chap linked, the VP numbers I threw in are Pew Research.

  92. #691743
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, happyscrapper said:

    What the heck is jammie connections? And so what? He has no right to do this. I always liked Hugh Hewitt, but if he has something to do with this, he will hear about it…plenty!

  93. #691748
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, John Deaux said:

    happy and ban,

    You guys are so in trouble!

    Seriously, can you blame us for being cautious? This guy better put up some serious credentials and make it public.

  94. #691749
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, bansharia said:

    happy,
    jammie connections as in pajama media that MM is involved with.
    I agree he has no right to do what he is doing. Yes I would email hugh and anyone else this guy name drops and say not ONE of you speak for everyone.
    as we said a few hours ago coordinate sure but check your ego at the door YOU do not DEFINE what this is about.
    As Happy2 said this is grassroots leaders not apply let alone annoint themselves…….

  95. #691753
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:51 pm, bansharia said:

    John,
    we both have gotten warnings for posting too much lmao!! what a crock.
    I dont give a hoot what or who he says he is HE does not speak for everyone who showed up at tea parties and if this kind of crap is allowed tea parties are DOA period.

  96. #691756
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:54 pm, frontierguy said:

    “Those of you who are watching certain news channels on which I’m not very popular, and you see folks waving tea bags around, Obama said, ” I just want you to know that I don’t give a crap what these people think. I won and the people who voted for me have no clue what I am doing, hell, most of them could not tell you who their senators are. I’m partying every night, it’s my prize. I’m flying my plane around like a drunk frat boy, tea baggers are just jealous.” That about sums it up, what a sanctimonious a$$.

  97. #691761
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:57 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Aloha;

    I may have mis-read what you wrote. Apologies is so.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, Tea Party



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook