See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 12:48 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

   * White nationalists
   * Black nationalists
   * Mexican nationalists
   * Puerto Rican nationalists
   * Violent religious sects
   * Jewish extremism

   Violent sects would already be criminal per “violence”. In the New Speak of the Current Obaminations “Violent and Extreme” religious groups would be those Christian who actually go to Church on Sunday and other extreme things such as tithe, read their Bible and most extreme of all actually be married to the mother/father of their children. “Violent and Extreme” religious groups WOULD NOT apply to mohammedans regardless of New Speak’s protestations.

   Jewish Extremism would be those Jews not willing to push other Jews into the sea nor bow before Baal and Molech -(that would be George Soros and/or Rahm Emmanuel). Anybody here sell PROUD TO BE AN EXTREMIST bumber stickers? I need two, three, I’ll put one on the Bass Boat.

   Rogue Cheddar said:

   I thought domestic extremism was when the wife buys new curtains because they don’t match the new throw pillows!?

   And TERRORISM; the most terrible words in the English-Spanish-German and all other languages: My husband can do that!

2. #102
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, yohannbiimu said:

   On May 1st, 2009 at 11:30 pm, Flyoverman said:

   On May 1st, 2009 at 10:57 pm, yohannbiimu said:

   I cannot agree. Al Queada will be who hits us; the very people THEY are releasing, trying to “engage,” granting civil rights to, while attempting to try the people who successfully protected us for over 7 years.

   The America First isolationist movement was the most influential group in America prior to WW II. After December 7, 1941, they disappeared overnight. They had no credibility.

   What do you think will happen when Al Queada kills so many Americans people will forget about 9/11? The other thing you have to remember is Al Queda tried and failed to take out the Twin Towers in 1993. They came back on 9/11 and took them out. On 9/11 only the heroism of Flight 93’s passengers saved the Capitol. Bin Laden will try again. These idiots in Washington will open the door wide for him. Sucks to be them, if they are in the impact area.

   My answer to that would be yet another question: WHO controls the information that is released in America? Even if it is released through other sources, you can be sure that 95% of them in the US will shrug off the “claimed credit” by the Islamists by the “proof” that they have at their disposal.

   Regardless of what happens, this administration definitely has the propensity to use a “crisis” as the pretext in order to claim the “right” to crush their opponents, and we also know that the vast majority of the “media” and ALL of the leftists will fall in line with whatever the Obama administration does.

   All they will have to do is claim something as a pretext to act, and they’ll do so with impunity. Who will be able to stop them?

3. #103
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 12:52 pm, Laree said:

   Saturday Afternoon Reflections The Last Time Sean Penn Said something that made any damn sense and is actually pertinent to our present times.

   http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/05/saturday-afternoon-reflections-were-no.html

4. #104
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 1:14 pm, yohannbiimu said:

   One element that is sort of missing in this discussion is the fact that leftist believe that HUMAN BEINGS are a blight upon the Earth, and that its population must be controlled in order for the survival of “the planet.”

   Therefore, I can assure you that the elimination of large portions of US are in the works by the eco-Nazis. They are making lists of people who must be eradicated, including political enemies, religious enemies, people of ANY propensity towards individual thought and action outside the mindless collective, and even large numbers of their own who are not sufficiently in line with their agenda to be counted as those chosen to live in a perfect human collective.

   Naturally, those directing the path of the leftist drones will survive this purge of humanity, as well as their direct underlings (Obama being one of these will be assured that he and his progeny will live in this Utopian wonderland). However, billions upon billions of people MUST be gotten rid of for the “collective good.” This is what they believe. This is what we are up against.

5. #105
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, bansharia said:

   okie dokie as once again we have a dead thread on a dead blog:

   my new name for obambi’s teleprompter is The telepimper feel free to use as you see fit.
   enjoy your weekend.

6. #106
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 1:54 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   There is PLENTY to discuss this weekend.

   For instance, Chrysler. Yesterday’s Chrysler bankruptcy is one of those watershed events that undermines contract law and may very well undermine the ability of banks, businesses and individuals to borrow money. Read Powerline’s take.

   It is no accident that at a time when the effective borrowing rate for banks is -5%, yes I did say minus, they are very reluctant to lend money. Why should they? Collateral means nothing when contracts are no longer backed by our courts unless they further a political need. So why would anyone sign a contract anymore if it doesn’t have the rule of law behind it?

   Welcome to Obama’s tree house government. Read the sign: “No grownups allowed!”

7. #107
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 1:58 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   Now read Bloomberg’s more politically correct take.

   Obama didn’t win. His bluff was called by the “evil” hedge funds who were merely defending everyone’s constitutional rights. That was the same point that caused Bank of American’s Ken Lewis trouble with his shareholders. He should have fulfilled his fiduciary duty to the shareholders and found the spine to stand up to Paulson. It was an important battle that never took place. Lewis surrendered without a fight.

   If we don’t talk about these things, we will lose.

8. #108
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 1:58 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   Sorry about the caps. Should have “previewed” first.

9. #109
   On May 2nd, 2009 at 2:22 pm, tiredofit08 said:

   On May 1st, 2009 at 10:12 pm, JDinTX said:

   On May 1st, 2009 at 5:53 pm, tiredofit08 said:

   I agree with all you said. I am also a veteran and have arrested 100’s of illegal aliens in my previous work as a police officer. If this administraion knew how many people really fit their definition of a “terrorist”, they should really be scared. They don’t know how many are willing to defend their country and theirselves.

   the government should fear the people not the people fearing the government.

10. #110
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 3:10 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Here is a link reporting about the latest pirate seizures by Somali pirates.

    I was brutally attacked by several commentors here a few weeks ago when I defended the filing of formal charges in a NJ court by the FBI against the Maertz pirates. I want you guys to pay particular attention to the details on the recapturing of two of the captured ships by NATO forces. Did you notice that once again they had to release the pirates? Why do you think that is? Wouldn’t you rather that they be tried somewhere? Anywhere?

    Your witness counselor.

11. #111
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 3:40 pm, shooter said:

    a couple of things…
    We started to let the left take over when they took God out of the schools. The people with no morals, have no real ethics to live by, have zero real power. So they have to RELY upon themselves, (look up HUBRIS, its origin too) their own simple arrogant yet finite heads… therefor great troubles will increase as long as that thought process is in control.
    MM wrote this at the WashTimes.

    But in the age of Obama, there’s no room for such nuance and inconvenient truths. A decent young woman is a “dumb …” for holding the same view of marriage as the Obamessiah. A conservative campus speaker is bullied as a hatemonger by wild-eyed hatemongers. A grass-roots movement is debased as a bunch of racist vulgarians by a media mob of racists and vulgarians. Civility and tolerance have taken a left-hand turn down a one-way street. So much for changing course.

    and, a WINNING answer for the Miss USA pageant in 1976 is somehow the losing answer in 2009. Plus it is followed by immense hate filled ridicule by those who act with impunity, those who have no God I would guess.

    “the government should fear the people not the people fearing the government.”

    We need to remind obama and congress;
    The Constitution was written largely to protect US…
    FROM THEM.

12. #112
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 3:40 pm, DagneyT said:

    On May 1st, 2009 at 6:01 pm, rightisright said:

    domestic extremist: An American loving, legal, overtaxed, defender of his country citzen.

    I’ll accept that and damn proud of being one.

    A greaat big “DITTO”, and a vehement AMEN, BROTHER!

    Wait, I’m not black…am I allowed to say that? I know there are black conservatives here! HELP

13. #113
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 3:41 pm, graysonret said:

    latest pirate seizures by Somali pirates

    I wonder why I work as hard as I do. Heck, I do a lot better being a pirate in Somalia. A couple of hijacks, a couple of million and I can retire. If I get caught; no problem, back again tomorrow.

14. #114
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 5:00 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    shooter:

    Spot on, the Constitution WAS written to protect us from THEM.

    That’s why it must be undermined by treaty, trick, or reinterpretation.

    Is there anyone left that will uphold it?

    No one will even require proof of Obama’s eligibilty, so my guess is no.

    He’s working on becoming President for life and remaking America, the supine GOP is assisting.

15. #115
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 5:58 pm, Ragspierre said:

    PP:
    I was brutally attacked by several commentors here a few weeks ago when I defended the filing of formal charges in a NJ court by the FBI against the Maertz pirates. I want you guys to pay particular attention to the details on the recapturing of two of the captured ships by NATO forces. Did you notice that once again they had to release the pirates? Why do you think that is? Wouldn’t you rather that they be tried somewhere? Anywhere?
    
    Your witness counselor.

    Since this seems pretty clearly to have been addressed to me, I’ll take it on…

    First, as to those brutal attacks, I recommend Bactine and band-aids for your boo-boo. Have Mommy kiss it, too.

    Second, my position was, is, and will be tomorrow that pirates….

    taken in piracy…

    should be summarily executed. Period.

    Historically, that’s what they could count on, and it was totally legal, moral, and non-fattening.

    That is what my study of admiralty law says. How about yours, PP?

    Somehow, that got “civilized” into being outre’. Not the done thing, you know…

    I would not “arrest” them, or keep them alive unless intelligence mining was the purpose.

    I also wouldn’t leave a vessel they operated afloat.

    That’s not something I’d leave to the Ewe Inn, either. They are worse than useless, and only give the appearance of an actual military in recent DECADES. Now, if any of those pirates were adolescent girls, they could count on being raped by the Ewe Inn personnel… I do not approve of that.

    I very much doubt that being “arrested” (tried and convicted) is going to prove much of a deterrent to pirates.

    What is your expert opinion, there, PP?

16. #116
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 6:05 pm, Ragspierre said:

    PP:
    For instance, Chrysler. Yesterday’s Chrysler bankruptcy is one of those watershed events that undermines contract law and may very well undermine the ability of banks, businesses and individuals to borrow money. Read Powerline’s take.

    It is no accident that at a time when the effective borrowing rate for banks is -5%, yes I did say minus, they are very reluctant to lend money. Why should they? Collateral means nothing when contracts are no longer backed by our courts unless they further a political need. So why would anyone sign a contract anymore if it doesn’t have the rule of law behind it?

    Having picked you up and shaken you in the last post…

    I want to take the opportunity to give you an attaboy.

    Everything you said there was dead on.

    I VERY much hope that the bankruptcy judges will show their contempt for THE ONE’s contempt of the rule of law, and protect the bond-holders via due process.

    Again, this is an example of how these Obama fascists are politicizing every stinking thing.

    It CANNOT be allowed to stand.

17. #117
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 6:09 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On May 2nd, 2009 at 5:58 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I would have to agree with Rags on this issue. The pirates should be shot on sight and their boat sunk. Period. There is no logical reason to let them live. I am serious. Until a strong stance is taken, these attacks will get more and more frequent. It is the same principle as foreign policy. Continue to let the evil ones get away with things and they will step up the terror. Obama….are you listening? Oh, never mind.

18. #118
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 6:56 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    OT-
    

    BAGHDAD — The government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki said Al Qaida worked closely with former operatives in Saddam Hussein regime.

    Officials said leading members of the Al Qaida network have coordinated operations with Saddam aides since 2003. They said Al Qaida and Saddam forces attacked Shi’ites in an effort to spark a civil war in Iraq.

    “They agreed that Al Qaida would carry out the suicide attacks, while the Baathists [Saddam's ruling party] would do the remote-control bombs,” Al Maliki said.

    The Al Qaida-Saddam link, asserted by then-U.S. President George Bush in 2002, came in wake of the reported capture of a leading Al Qaida commander in Iraq.

    Well, I’m sure THIS will make the MSM tomorrow…

19. #119
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 7:01 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Well, I’m sure THIS will make the MSM tomorrow…
    

    Why, we won’t hear of anything else BUT that…

    for DAYS…!!!

20. #120
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 7:02 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On May 2nd, 2009 at 6:56 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Jeff…I always felt very strongly that the Iraq/Al Qaida connection was there. I think Bush knew it for a fact, but for some reason was not able to articulate those facts very well to the American people. He was a decent man, but just didn’t get the message out effectively. Of course, the MSM never gave him the chance. And the liberals did everything they could to obscure his message with the “Bush lied, people died” rants. Another reason why I despise the radical left and brand them all as traitors.

21. #121
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 7:41 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    At least the truth is out, finally…

22. #122
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 7:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On May 2nd, 2009 at 7:41 pm, Jeff2161 said:
    At least the truth is out, finally…

    Well, the truth is out for those who will hear it. It is possible that the Obama administration will use their thug tactics to hide these facts, obscure them, or create a diversion so that they have time to change the story and re-write history. Somehow they will find a way to do that!

23. #123
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 7:53 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I guess you can tell I have ZERO confidence in this administration’s ability to be truthful!

24. #124
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 8:03 pm, jangar said:

    shooter said:
    a couple of things…
    We started to let the left take over when they took God out of the schools

    You’re right…and we just sat there and said “oh my goodness”, and didn’t have a response to what was happening to our morals as a nation. It was the Church that sat that period out and stopped being salt in an unsavory world. Now we are reaping what you get when you don’t sew good seed…

    WEEDS.

25. #125
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 8:05 pm, jangar said:

    happyscrapper said:
    I guess you can tell I have ZERO confidence in this administration’s ability to be truthful!

    I never had any since before the election. Dems have a piss-poor track record when it comes to truth.

26. #126
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 8:27 pm, akoypinoy said:

    Well, the truth is out for those who will hear it. It is possible that the Obama administration will use their thug tactics to hide these facts, obscure them, or create a diversion so that they have time to change the story and re-write history. Somehow they will find a way to do that!

    Now add this one to the hundred of pounds of used uranium that was secretly shipped out of Iraq sometime last year and you’d think that Pres. G. W. Bush will be vindicated. Don’t hold your breath on this one if you’re waiting for the MSM puppets to report on it.

27. #127
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 8:37 pm, happyscrapper said:

    As I have said in previous threads…the MSM is corrupt and their CEO’s should be charged with treason. The head of GE, who owns NBC and MSNBC needs to be put in prison, at the very least. When our financial advisor told us last week that we had some stock (just a tiny bit) in GE as part of our portfolio, I was stunned. I told him to get us out of there!! I wonder how many others have their stock as part of a package, and don’t even realize it.

28. #128
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 8:52 pm, love2rumba said:

    I told him to get us out of there!! I wonder how many others have their stock as part of a package, and don’t even realize it.

    Probably quite a few people do not know (and perhaps don’t care) where their money is invested in.

29. #129
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 10:22 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Here is a link reporting about the latest pirate seizures by Somali pirates.

    Wimp writ large. ALL the pirates should have been dead years ago. If we need to retrofit a few destroyers with yard arms so be it. If we want the lads to have a fair trial send me as a special Admiralty Judge. I look good in uniform, work cheap and would bring my own rope. These poly blend ropes last for years and come in neat colors.

30. #130
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 10:27 pm, Ragspierre said:

    These poly blend ropes last for years and come in neat colors.

    Wonderfully efficient, too…!!!! Think of the savings over trial, appeals, and years in federal hose-gows…!!!!

31. #131
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 11:18 pm, dan708 said:

    I oppose a driver license for Ted Kennedy. Guess I’m an extremist, too.

32. #132
    On May 2nd, 2009 at 11:55 pm, frontierguy said:

    I went to the huff po site a few days ago and there was an article about the justifications for amnesty. I read the comments and was blown away, it was a majority anti-amnesty with a few people (very few) coming in to post that the other people were racists, haters, etc. Most of the comments were calling for the government to enforce the law, asking how can we bring in so many more hungry mouths when there are not enough jobs right now, and saying that if we were to enforce the laws the illegals would self deport. I believe another amnesty attempt is going to cause a lot of civil unrest. Seems to me that the government are the terrorists, their actions inciting chaos.

33. #133
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 12:03 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Rags: you missed the whole point of my post including your feeling that I was singling you out. There were others.

    First of all, pirates will never be summarily executed as a matter of international policy so we can take that off the table. You can keep advocating it if it makes you feel good but it won’t happen. That takes us back to the real world. In the real world, there is the US and there is the rest of the world.

    The rest of the world has decided to have a policy of paying ransom. They also have no laws to prosecute the pirates if caught so they get released.

    The US has a long-standing policy, almost as old as America itself, that we will not negotiate with pirates nor pay them ransom. Once trapped, they know they will either be killed or taken prisoner to face serious charges in the US. There are very few ships sailing under the US flag off of Somalia so we aren’t a big target. But make no mistake about it, the next time they see the US flag, they will think twice.

    So there are your choices. Civilized nations abandoned summary executions at sea centuries ago. Your option makes no sense. The rest of the world has decided to pay the pirates as a cost of doing business. We have chosen to give the pirates two very harsh options and have proven that we will not bend. One of the options is death, the other is a very long prison term or even death if any of us gets killed.

    Our way works. Did you notice that once confronted with the Marines assigned to NATO, those 19 pirates immediately surrendered without a fight? Had those ships been US-flagged, they would have faced charges. They didn’t want to die but they also knew that there would be no consequences since non-US nations have no laws to prosecute them under. As an attorney, you should understand that.

    We will never adopt a policy of summary execution. It is not warranted nor is it needed. Those pirates are hardly more more than teen street gangs on boats.

34. #134
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 1:30 am, Ragspierre said:

    So there are your choices. Civilized nations abandoned summary executions at sea centuries ago.

    Document that for me, please.

    One of the options is death, the other is a very long prison term or even death if any of us gets killed.

    Document that for me, please.

    We will never adopt a policy of summary execution. It is not warranted nor is it needed. Those pirates are hardly more more than teen street gangs on boats.

    What they are is terrorists on boats.

    You ever dealt with a street gang, kid?

35. #135
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 1:34 am, Ragspierre said:

    But make no mistake about it, the next time they see the US flag, they will think twice.

    If I had the time, I’d go back and get all the quotes from those “rebuked” pirates you were blathering about a while back, who were promising to target American crews and slaughter them.

    Were you ever in the military, PP???

36. #136
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 1:49 am, Ragspierre said:

    Did you notice that once confronted with the Marines assigned to NATO, those 19 pirates immediately surrendered without a fight?

    Ummm…

    PP, what makes you think the “marines” on the Portuguese warship were OUR marines…?

    You do know that lots of countries have marines on board their warships….

    right?

37. #137
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 10:52 am, Ragspierre said:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/CharlesKrauthammer/2009/05/01/torture_no_except

    OT, but really a good piece by
    Dr. Krauthammer on torture.

    Oh, and its from that nest of RINOs (according to PP) where you’ll also see Michelle’s latest…

38. #138
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 11:14 am, tampadave said:

    The World of Political Correctness under the reign of King Obama never fails to amaze me.

39. #139
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 11:56 am, fgmorley said:

    On May 2nd, 2009 at 12:18 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    Constant whining about the hopelessness of our plight or calls to armed resurrection might trigger spirited threads but the people who are committed to making a difference leave. So what’s the point?

    And also b-cat:

    These forums are great as far as ranting goes, myself included.

    Show me where the people committed to making a difference on these fora, are actually making a difference.

    This is all just talk and talk is cheap. Whine, gripe all you want. I haven’t really seen much in the way of new ideas sprouting from these posts.

    Action, as in the Tea Party movement, is a great start. Did you notice how it was received nationwide? Dismissed. Ridiculed. DHS memos.

    Do you really think that the government or the majority of the electorate is reasonable enough to listen to your ideas? Or even consider them in a debate? I do not.

    The time for debate has long passed. When your opponents, i.e. Al Quaeda, dhimmicrats, etc. do not listen to or even entertain
    the notion that you have any right to exist, then you must eliminate them, or be eliminated.

40. #140
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 12:05 pm, Ragspierre said:

    fg;

    Would you try a well-organized, morally based campaign of civil disobedience before getting to the elimination option?

    STARVE THE BEAST

    Simply refuse to be eaten.

41. #141
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 2:02 pm, DannoJyd said:

    On May 3rd, 2009 at 11:56 am, fgmorley said:
    Show me where the people committed to making a difference on these fora, are actually making a difference.

    OK. As a returning GOP volunteer I spoke to hundreds of interested voters who remain disgusted with McAmnesty. Due to his selection of Sarah we were able to do quite well locally. We gained some ground, we also assisted in getting elected first timer Sharon Tyler who ran in an ajoining county. Hers was a difficult seat to win, but we did it.

    That is what I did, and that is what I do. What have you done lately that is relevant?

42. #142
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 3:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

    And I encourage you to keep up your good works.

    Thank you for your efforts.

    I candidly wish I thought it would…or even could…be enough…

    But any success is good!

43. #143
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 5:15 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Now our true enemies only have to worry about when and where will be the most opportune time to strike.

44. #144
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 9:25 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    ALL the pirates should have been dead years ago. If we need to retrofit a few destroyers with yard arms so be it.
    

    Tom Clancy had a great response in Clear and Present Danger…It was Coast Guard, as I recall…

45. #145
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 9:26 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    How many military desperately, want to show these people the wrath of the U.S.?
    

46. #146
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 9:26 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    No survivors, no Guantanamo…

47. #147
    On May 3rd, 2009 at 10:18 pm, sonofdy said:

    I was decleared a dangerous potental terrorist some time ago so whats new?

    I am a white, middle class veteran who owns a gun.

48. #148
    On May 4th, 2009 at 7:38 am, DannoJyd said:

    On May 3rd, 2009 at 3:32 pm, Ragspierre said:
    And I encourage you to keep up your good works.
    Thank you for your efforts.
    I candidly wish I thought it would…or even could…be enough…
    But any success is good!

    It’s all about baby steps.

    Everyone has an excuse. Work, family, AlGorbal Warming … there is always something to keep us procrastinating, but leftists seem to get involved at the grass roots level. Why is that?

    I see plenty of people making their commentary on the blogs, but only a few show up where their meger efforts would do the most good. Why is that?

    Babys fight to get mobilized. They fall, they cry, they fail. Their task seems insurmountable when they start out, but in the end they succeed. Why is that?

    Conservatives are doing more than their fair share of crying. I sure hope they learn to walk soon. They are an embarassment.

49. #149
    On May 4th, 2009 at 9:14 am, Ragspierre said:

    Cool web site.

    I remember, listening to local radio programs before the TEA Parties, hearing people who were saying they would have to drive 20 or 30 miles, or take off work early in order to attend. I was floored!

    We are a cossetted, soft people, and we don’t really get how dangerous are the times. If we really did, we’d be doing MORE, and talking LESS.

50. #150
    On May 5th, 2009 at 10:01 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Is this America? This has to be a joke?

    U) anti-immigration extremism: (U//FOUO) A movement of groups or individuals who are vehemently opposed to illegal immigration, particularly along the U.S. southwest border with Mexico, and who have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism to advance their extremist goals. They are highly critical of the U.S. Government’s response to illegal immigration and oppose government programs that are designed to extend “rights” to illegal aliens, such as issuing driver’s licenses or national identification cards and providing in-state tuition, medical benefits, or public education.

    DOH, Isn’t there laws on the books about ILLEGAL immigrants? Hello? MCFLY? Is their something in the definition of ILLEGAL I am missing?

    Americans are now the targets in their own country.