<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s choices: Gird your loins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:38:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justice Ginsburg Hospitalized, Raising Questions about the Future of the Supreme Court &#124; haha thats so funny lol xD</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-812871</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice Ginsburg Hospitalized, Raising Questions about the Future of the Supreme Court &#124; haha thats so funny lol xD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-812871</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin rundown on Elena Kagen &amp; Diane Wood &#8211; http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin rundown on Elena Kagen &amp; Diane Wood &#8211; <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FACTS: WHY VOTE AGAINST SOTOMAYOR &#171; FactReal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-747244</link>
		<dc:creator>FACTS: WHY VOTE AGAINST SOTOMAYOR &#171; FactReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-747244</guid>
		<description>[...] no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at the core of this case.&#8221; -She was chastised by fellow Clinton-appointee Jose Cabranes: Judge Sotomayor’s panel heard a case raising important questions under Title VII and equal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at the core of this case.&#8221; -She was chastised by fellow Clinton-appointee Jose Cabranes: Judge Sotomayor’s panel heard a case raising important questions under Title VII and equal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rule of Law or Rule of Judges&#8211;Yakkety Yak&#8211;You Know&#8211;Takes A Racist To Appoint A Racist! &#171; Pronk Palisades</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-707917</link>
		<dc:creator>Rule of Law or Rule of Judges&#8211;Yakkety Yak&#8211;You Know&#8211;Takes A Racist To Appoint A Racist! &#171; Pronk Palisades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-707917</guid>
		<description>[...] it’s Sonia Sotomayor. Identity politics triumphs. Here’s the bio/record info I shared at the beginning of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it’s Sonia Sotomayor. Identity politics triumphs. Here’s the bio/record info I shared at the beginning of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor, een ervaren latina &#124; Canards</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-707686</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor, een ervaren latina &#124; Canards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-707686</guid>
		<description>[...] kritiek is niet helemaal uit de lucht gegrepen. In 2002 verklaart Sotomayor in een toespraak in Berkeley dat rechters hun ervaringen als vrouw of gekleurd persoon mee kunnen wegen in een oordeel. Dat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kritiek is niet helemaal uit de lucht gegrepen. In 2002 verklaart Sotomayor in een toespraak in Berkeley dat rechters hun ervaringen als vrouw of gekleurd persoon mee kunnen wegen in een oordeel. Dat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor: I Would Think Latinas Reach Better Conclusions Than White Males : The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-707231</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor: I Would Think Latinas Reach Better Conclusions Than White Males : The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-707231</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s this. We already knew that Sotomayer thinks that judges should draw from their &#8220;experiences as women and people of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s this. We already knew that Sotomayer thinks that judges should draw from their &#8220;experiences as women and people of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; SCOTUS pick: Sonia Sotomayor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-707182</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; SCOTUS pick: Sonia Sotomayor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-707182</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s Sonia Sotomayor, according to AP. Here&#8217;s the bio/record info I shared at the beginning of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s Sonia Sotomayor, according to AP. Here&#8217;s the bio/record info I shared at the beginning of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Case Against Sotomayor &#171; Patriot Burr</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-707158</link>
		<dc:creator>The Case Against Sotomayor &#171; Patriot Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-707158</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin, “Judge Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court would be very concerning given her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin, “Judge Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court would be very concerning given her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: Sotomayor Picked for SCOTUS : The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-707128</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: Sotomayor Picked for SCOTUS : The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-707128</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin had legal friends do a profile of her and other possible picks a few weeks back. Sotomayor&#8217;s a real treat, let me tell [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin had legal friends do a profile of her and other possible picks a few weeks back. Sotomayor&#8217;s a real treat, let me tell [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP: Six Names on Obama&#8217;s SCOTUS Short-List : The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-700150</link>
		<dc:creator>AP: Six Names on Obama&#8217;s SCOTUS Short-List : The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-700150</guid>
		<description>[...] attempted to apply RICO to prevent pro-life activists from engaging in protests and, as documented by Michelle Malkin, has shown hostility to religious groups and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attempted to apply RICO to prevent pro-life activists from engaging in protests and, as documented by Michelle Malkin, has shown hostility to religious groups and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Opinionator: The Early Line on the High Court - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-697786</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Opinionator: The Early Line on the High Court - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-697786</guid>
		<description>[...] had a good list with thumbnail descriptions.) Less objective was Michelle Malkin&#8217;s take on the three highest-profile nominees: Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Judge Diane Wood and Elena Kagan, the White House&#8217;s new solicitor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had a good list with thumbnail descriptions.) Less objective was Michelle Malkin&#8217;s take on the three highest-profile nominees: Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Judge Diane Wood and Elena Kagan, the White House&#8217;s new solicitor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOTUS: Summer’s upon us but a cold chill is in the air &#171; Seeing Red AZ</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-694222</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTUS: Summer’s upon us but a cold chill is in the air &#171; Seeing Red AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-694222</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin’s post, Obama’s choices: Gird your loins, gives an overview of just a few of the potential picks. Reading through the brief resumes is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin’s post, Obama’s choices: Gird your loins, gives an overview of just a few of the potential picks. Reading through the brief resumes is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to Expect From Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court Pick &#171; I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-693799</link>
		<dc:creator>What to Expect From Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court Pick &#171; I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-693799</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin has written about some of Obama&#8217;s potential choices here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin has written about some of Obama&#8217;s potential choices here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-693714</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-693714</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What Obama was doing as head “editor” was reading submissions and deciding which were important enough to be published.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Unless you were there, how do you know this to be his contribution as editor?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because that is what EICs do.  It is not conjecture or opinion to say, for example, that firefighters fight fires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What Obama was doing as head “editor” was reading submissions and deciding which were important enough to be published.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
Unless you were there, how do you know this to be his contribution as editor?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Because that is what EICs do.  It is not conjecture or opinion to say, for example, that firefighters fight fires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of the Blogs - Weekend of May 3 on The Patriot Room</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-693647</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of the Blogs - Weekend of May 3 on The Patriot Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-693647</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: Obama&#039;s Supreme Court Choices  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court Choices  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBNinKY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/01/obamas-choices-gird-your-loins/comment-page-3/#comment-693557</link>
		<dc:creator>DBNinKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27360#comment-693557</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On May 3rd, 2009 at 9:27 pm, lgm said:&lt;/blockquote&gt;Note that your own points of contention are only conjecture and opinion and are without sources to support them, which is the exact charge you are making against the writer.

For example:&lt;blockquote&gt;What Obama was doing as head “editor” was reading submissions and deciding which were important enough to be published.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Unless you were there, how do you know this to be his contribution as editor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On May 3rd, 2009 at 9:27 pm, lgm said:</p></blockquote>
<p>Note that your own points of contention are only conjecture and opinion and are without sources to support them, which is the exact charge you are making against the writer.</p>
<p>For example:<br />
<blockquote>What Obama was doing as head “editor” was reading submissions and deciding which were important enough to be published.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unless you were there, how do you know this to be his contribution as editor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
