See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:08 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   transition/resettlement costs

   Aren’t they just going to give them ACORN-seized homes?

2. #2
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, ajmontana said:

   I’ll take all the detainee’s for a million…. just line em up along the back wall………

3. #3
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   We won’t fund it, so you’ll just have to let them out into the streets!

4. #4
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   A new batch of landscapers coming to a neighborhood near you.

5. #5
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, ajmontana said:

   Just make em all jump off the sears tower.

6. #6
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Since this is all symbolic, why not just put them in blue jumpsuits instead of orange, and leave them at their “human-induced, sun-drenched, ocean-view resort”?

7. #7
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:13 pm, ajmontana said:

   or just make em Senators, could they do any worse?

8. #8
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Knock-knock….

   “Yes, may I help you?”

   “I am Al Kaeeda, your new neighbor. I just came over to borrow a cup of C4.”

9. #9
   On May 4th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, sonofdy said:

   release them from 50,000 feet over the dead center of the pacific ocean covered in pigs blood.

   Problem solved.

10. #10
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, chapoutier said:

    Just make em all jump off the sears tower.

    By the time they get out, there won’t be a Sears Tower to jump off.

    The Willis Tower, maybe.

11. #11
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:18 pm, tre said:

    OH MAH GOODNESS!! SOMETHING ELSE TO BAILOUT!!! ANOTHER $50 MILLION DOWN THE DUMPER!!!

12. #12
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:20 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The Willis Tower, maybe.

    My first thought – “Bruce Willis has a Tower?”

13. #13
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:20 pm, Paul Revere said:

    They’ll do it under the cover of darkness, and then blame Boooosh for making those innocent men become America-hating democrats terrorists.

14. #14
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    My first thought – “Bruce Willis has a Tower?”

    Please take this poll.

15. #15
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:25 pm, txvet2 said:

    50 mil? They can get that much out of Michelle O’s shoe budget without anybody noticing it’s gone.

16. #16
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, Sniper One said:

    Can we get a night in the Lincoln bedroom like Clinton used to hand out?

17. #17
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Jihadi relocation telethon, you say?

    But my journey is part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to apply the values of their faith to our society. It’s a journey that takes us back to our nation’s founding, when none other than a UCC church inspired the Boston Tea Party and helped bring an Empire to its knees.

    Barack Obama
    A Politics of Conscience
    Hartford, CT | June 23, 2007

    Jihad: From Jakarta To The Whitehouse

    I believe Obama is both a Marxist and a Jihadist. I bet the degree of separation between him and the Gitmo detainees is a very small number. Our founding fathers did not think in terms of bringing an Empire to its knees. But Obama and the Gitmo detainees certainly do.

    Yes, I’ve posted this material many times before, but it bears repeating.

18. #18
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, rw said:

    Obama should set an example and let them move into the WH. They could watch his kids so that his MIL can move home. It would be like Charles in Charge, except with KSM instead of Scott Baio.

19. #19
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Sniper One said:

    Michelle Obama = Imelda Marcos

20. #20
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, txvet2 said:

    lgm swooped and pooped on this a few threads ago. I asked him how many of the Uighurs he’d take, but he hasn’t gotten back to me on that yet.

21. #21
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, norm1111 said:

    For 6 long years these neo-Dem cowards have been bawling about closing Gitmo….and now just to prove their cowardice, they won’t fund what they have wanted for years. I don’t want it closed, but I do believe this shows just how cowardly and hypocritical these useless bags of political skin..aka..the Democrats, are to the country………

22. #22
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, 55dodger said:

    I was thinking we send them to Mexico for a week, then back to the White House for a States dinner with Obama and all the leading democrats. After that they can all fly back to CA with Pelosi on her plane and we can release them in Berkeley and or SF.

23. #23
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, Hangfire said:

    Hope they can all get their taxi licenses before Gitmo closes.

24. #24
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    This is nothing more than another dog-and-pony show.

    Some on the left pretend to oppose Hussein, but then will immediately turn around and give him what he wants.

    And that’s the key phrase, what he wants, not what is good for this nation.

    Dance, monkey, dance!

25. #25
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, Ragspierre said:

    If the Dimocrats really care (which I do not believe) about these Jihadist thugs, and were not just using them as a club to beat up their opposition…

    MAKE them publicly vote the funds to move them and house them.

    That way, we’ll have a bloody shirt to plaster on each member of Congress who supports that horrific idea with our tax money when another American is killed by these pirates.

26. #26
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, USN RET said:

    They could be stunt doubles for Achmed the Dead Terrorist. Of course we would have to kill them first. Silence!!

27. #27
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, Flyoverman said:

    $167,000 per detainee? What do two 9mm rounds cost?

    Elk Creek can probably contribute that many rounds as part of his inventory rotation.

28. #28
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Can’t we just march them to the gate into Cuba ? Or, let ‘em swim home. Can’t Al Qaeda afford plane tickets after 9/11 ?

    plenty o’ sarc

    OT- Michelle Malkin…Since Hot Air is a subsidiary site of yours…Can you enable the same User and passwords for those of us who want to comment there, as well ?
    Thanx

29. #29
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, John Deaux said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, rw said:
    Obama should set an example and let them move into the WH. They could watch his kids so that his MIL can move home. It would be like Charles in Charge, except with KSM instead of Scott Baio.

    Or Mr Belvedere, except instead of giving etiquette advice, he can dispense Sharia advice.

30. #30
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, chapoutier said:

    Or Mr Belvedere, except instead of giving etiquette advice, he can dispense Sharia advice.

    Isn’t Benson the obvious comaprison to make?

31. #31
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:40 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Ahhh Benson, the power behind an empty-headed politician. Played by Rahm Emmanuel ?

32. #32
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    My first thought – “Bruce Willis has a Tower?”
    Please take this poll.

    Yippeee-kay-ay….(sp?)

33. #33
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:41 pm, Hangfire said:

    send them all to France.

    (no reason, I just don’t like the French.)

34. #34
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    I think it is obvious, Aloha, based on the huge sampling of (so far) 9 people, that your opinions on the topic of “Willis” lies far outside of mainstream America, as represented here. I am pretty sure this lands you on some Homeland Security extremist definition.

35. #35
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, John Deaux said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, chapoutier said:

    Isn’t Benson the obvious comaprison to make?

    Perhaps Soap would be more appropo. Drama, intrigue, and alien abductions. Yup, fits the bill.

36. #36
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Can’t we just march them to the gate into Cuba ?

    We’re giving the place back to Cuba. Just leave them there and let Castro figure out what to do with them.

37. #37
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, Southpaw said:

    Amid complaints that terror suspects could be brought to the U.S., House Democrats on Monday rebuffed the Obama administration’s request for $50 million to relocate prisoners from the detention facility at Guantanamo, Cuba.

    Um, Dumbocrats, any politically unpopular decision is solely the responsibility of the Dumbocratic Congress and the Dumbocratic White House. It isn’t as easy as your squawking for the past eight years would suggest.

38. #38
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I think it is obvious, Aloha, based on the huge sampling of (so far) 9 people, that your opinions on the topic of “Willis” lies far outside of mainstream America

    My mind went to the Bruce, too.

    His agent would be sooooooo pleased…

    Branding is everything…

39. #39
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Where is lgm? Is this not his favorite subject?

    Get them all jobs at Jimmy Dean grinding pork for sausage.

40. #40
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, Insomniac said:

    My first thought – “Bruce Willis has a Tower?”

    Nakatomi Plaza.

41. #41
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, chapoutier said:

    My mind went to the Bruce, too.

    “Bruce” is making a comeback in the poll.

    This cannot stand.

    Come on “Whatchoo talkin bouts.” Make your voice heard. It only lets you vote once, but I am pretty sure that if you delete your cookies, it would let you vote again. Like in Ohio.

42. #42
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, John Deaux said:

    Perhaps Soap would be more appropo. Drama, intrigue, and alien abductions.

    I resemble that remark.

43. #43
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, California Red said:

    The One already said that he closed Gitmo in his first hundred days. What is this all about?

44. #44
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I am pretty sure that if you delete your cookies…

    Given the daily news, I do all I can to keep from tossing my cookies..

45. #45
    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, chapoutier said:

    it would let you vote again. Like in Ohio.

    Wrong software. You can use Minnesota’s updated version of the Washington State software though. That lets you make up the results you want.

46. #46
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, chapoutier said:

    I am off for the night.

    I know Aloha doesn’t believe me, but I really am in an internetless exile at nights.

    When I come back, I expect “Whatchoo” to be winning handily. Come on people. I can only vote so many times.

47. #47
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Club me for asking the obvious…

    What difference would it make where they are detained???

48. #48
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I thought Murtha wanted them. Maybe the “red necks” in his district can pass the ball cap around to raise the funds to move them.

49. #49
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Put them up on a ‘Dunk Tank’ & charge 25 cents per baseball to toss.

    They’d make a ton of money. We might not ‘dunk’ them, but we’d sure throw a lot of balls…

50. #50
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:08 pm, Ragspierre said:

    What difference would it make where they are detained???

    If they hit US soil, there is a strong argument that we have to extend the same protections that any US citizen accused of a crime enjoys.

    That is a HUGE mistake, and runs counter to historical treatment of…say…enemy spies. Which is more analogous to what these mokes are, rather than criminals or POWs.

51. #51
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Club me for asking the obvious…

    What difference would it make where they are detained???

    I’ll defer to the lawyers to explain the details, but it seems to me that bringing them onshore would more than likely require giving them full “constitutional” treatment – and it’s unlikely anybody’s “Mirandized” them. Much, or most of the evidence against them would be tossed, and it’s unlikely that we could deport them after we couldn’t convict them in a civilian court. It’s also practically impossible to deport them, because nobody else wants them either. That means they wouldn’t be incarcerated – they’d be footloose and fancy free on the sidewalks of a city near you. Just my opinion, of course.

52. #52
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:15 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:08 pm, Ragspierre said:

    If they hit US soil, there is a strong argument that we have to extend the same protections that any US citizen accused of a crime enjoys.

    It seems to me that one of the main reasons for detainment is never even mentioned, much less debated. Prisoners of war/enemy combatants are seldom if ever released until the war is over. It isn’t a matter of trials and rights.

53. #53
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:16 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Far more feckless is the following from the linked article -

    “However, money could be transferred later—without a politically challenging vote—if it were needed to move the detainees.”

54. #54
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Prisoners of war/enemy combatants are seldom if ever released until the war is over. It isn’t a matter of trials and rights.

    But, again, these guys are not analogous to POWs. They are much more like enemy spies, who I think were tortured, and I KNOW were summarily executed historically. GB turned several captured Germans, for instance, with a simple choice: turn or die.

55. #55
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:16 pm, zyzzyg said:

    As is more than likely done far more frequently than anyone imagines.

56. #56
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Once again, I don’t know the legal aspects of this, but if they were captured on the battlefield, which includes pretty much the entirety of the M.E., that still puts them pretty much in the enemy combatants category. Not like terrorists in this country, which I would also lump in pretty much the same category as espionage agents. Spies (and war criminals, for that matter) did get trials, however, even if they were military and much less controlled by civilian rules of evidence and procedure.

57. #57
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Some spies got trials.

58. #58
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    your opinions on the topic of “Willis” lies far outside of mainstream America

    I think that blonde from “Moonlighting” probably has pretty extremist views of Willis.

59. #59
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:30 pm, txvet2 said:

    I haven’t heard of many cases in this country where anybody was summarily executed – except, of course on the battlefield and one instance during the Clinton Administration, but they were religious cultists, so they were fair game.

60. #60
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:30 pm, Ragspierre said:

    if they were captured on the battlefield, which includes pretty much the entirety of the M.E., that still puts them pretty much in the enemy combatants category

    I don’t pretend to be an authority, but…

    “enemy combatant” is a term of art. It has a defined meaning. These guys do not fit the conventions.

61. #61
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Prisoners of war/enemy combatants are seldom if ever released until the war is over. It isn’t a matter of trials and rights.

    We could always return them in similar condition to how they treat us…sans heads…
    For you folks in Rio Linda that means without heads attached…

62. #62
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Since, they ARE non-uniformed; the Geneva Conventions do NOT apply here.

63. #63
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:37 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Nor does the convention on civilian treatment.

64. #64
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:37 pm, txvet2 said:

    Yeah, I was thinking in terms of POW, and given that most of the guys we’re fighting in the M.E. don’t wear uniforms, they pretty much all fit in the “irregular” category. But since we’re not making any practical distinction that I’ve been able to see between military and non-military combatants (even though we should), it seems that treating them all as POWs would be more consistent. I take it you’d consider them all to be under the same general umbrella as resistance fighters – spies, saboteurs, etc.

65. #65
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I take it you’d consider them all to be under the same general umbrella as resistance fighters – spies, saboteurs, etc.

    And the penalty for being one in war-time is death; as soon as practicable.

66. #66
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Rod—jor!!!

67. #67
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:41 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Since, they ARE non-uniformed; the Geneva Conventions do NOT apply here.

    While that is legally true, it hasn’t been Bush Administration policy. I agree these people actually have no rights under international law, but our government doesn’t see it that way.

68. #68
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:42 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    For 6 long years these neo-Dem cowards have been bawling about closing Gitmo….and now just to prove their cowardice, they won’t fund what they have wanted for years.

    Another unfunded federal mandate,maybe. Relocate them to red state areas and force the states to pay for them. Free housing, health care, education (if desired), and a nice monthly stipend to spend on their hobbies.

69. #69
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:42 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Kind of like, Hamas…The Hamas terrorist hides behind a baby carriage to shoot while, an Israeli stands in front of one.

70. #70
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, Ragspierre said:

    We extended them due process that no law compels.

    That’s the kind of monsters we are….

71. #71
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Relocate them to red state areas and force the states to pay for them.

    Please ? With sugar on top ?

72. #72
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I’ll take some…If a few of us volunteer…
    Heh

73. #73
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, Ragspierre said:

    If they were housed in a Texas prison with the Aryan Brotherhood, maintaining them would not be an issue for long.

    But one fear is that, if they are housed in most American prisons, and cannot be segregated (ACLU), they will be effective recruiters.

74. #74
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, Ragspierre said:

    We extended them due process that no law compels.

    The court of public opinion – where no law applies, only “feelings”.

75. #75
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    And the penalty for being one in war-time is death; as soon as practicable

    Under responsible and mature leadership yes. Under this administration – a “get out of jail free” card, a genuine embossed certificate of apology signed by TEH ONE (suitable for framing), and all the afformentioned benefits I mentioned in a prior response.

76. #76
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Seriously…I have some interesting ideas under the heading of, ” Relocation Assistance ”

    

77. #77
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, Ragspierre said:

    If they were housed in a Texas prison with the Aryan Brotherhood, maintaining them would not be an issue for long.

    I was thinking of letting them go free on a few Hill Country hunting ranches, to take pressure off of the local deer herd…..They’d be a lot more sport than shooting deer eating at a feeder.

78. #78
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I havta figure they’d get “sported” pretty hard by the prison gangs…

79. #79
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    , if they are housed in most American prisons, and cannot be segregated (ACLU), they will be effective recruiters.

    Yes, they would, as has been the case already with domestic criminals of their ilk.

80. #80
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:57 pm, graysonret said:

    These terrorists are neither criminals, subject to the Constitution’s rights, or POWs. If they are released, expect more people to die. What happens if they are captured again? Give them U.S. citizenship?

81. #81
    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, Flyoverman said:
    $167,000 per detainee? What do two 9mm rounds cost?

    Elk Creek can probably contribute that many rounds as part of his inventory rotation.

    I don’t have any 9mm. My daughter has some 9mm but not enough to do the job. What I have the most is 7.62x54R and 7.62x38R. If we used that and buried them anywhere it could be blamed on the Stalinists in 1941. My only other option is to reload a lot of black powder ammunition in .45 Colt and 12 gauge brass, a lot of times.

    However, I much prefer that they be given the opportunity to swim to freedom in Cuba with the US Navy providing chum in the water. “There was a terrible accident during the First Annual Jihadist Trialathon in Guantanamo Bay. None of the participants survived the first leg, the ocean swim.”

    See? Easy!

    ECS

82. #82
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, Ragspierre said:

    But PP would object.

    We are supposed to be a civilized nation, dontcha know…

83. #83
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Hey, Elm…

    I think there’s only about 200 left.

    If they were lined up right…

84. #84
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:04 pm, cabrerski said:

    spaceycakes #49,

    Can we exchange the water with swine blood? Please, please, please…

85. #85
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    First Annual Jihadist Trialathon in Guantanamo Bay. None of the participants survived the first leg, the ocean swim.”

    ROTFLMAO

    

86. #86
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:25 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The more I’ve considered Elm’s idea, the more it appeals…

    provided that each Triathlete is equipped with a pigskin Speedo…

87. #87
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Relocate them to red state areas and force the states to pay for them.
    Please ? With sugar on top ?

    Nah, you’ve got it wrong – it’s “Thank you sir! May I have another?!”

88. #88
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 4th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, chapoutier said:
    I am off for the night.

    I know Aloha doesn’t believe me, but I really am in an internetless exile at nights.

    Stone-Age Democrat…

89. #89
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Nah, you’ve got it wrong – it’s “Thank you sir! May I have another?!”

    True, they do LOVE those college hi-jinks…

90. #90
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:38 pm, Hangfire said:

    Release them all. Make them part of a reality show where they have to drive from El Paso to Texarkana in pink Volvo’s with a “Honk if you love the Ayatollah” and “I (heart) Sharia Law” bumper sticker.

    First car to make it to Texarkana wins.

91. #91
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:40 pm, Hangfire said:

    Better yet…

    A Gitmo released prisoner AND an ACLU attorney per car.

92. #92
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:41 pm, WisCon said:

    Put them in D.C.

    If they are harmless it shouldn’t be a problem, right?

93. #93
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:45 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Better yet…

    A Gitmo released prisoner AND an ACLU attorney per car.

    Make it THREE ACLU attornies and a GITMO detainee driver – in SMART cars : ).

94. #94
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:48 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Make it THREE ACLU attornies and a GITMO detainee driver – in SMART cars : ).

    Eww… a three-fer…

    effecient…

95. #95
    On May 4th, 2009 at 6:49 pm, right_on said:

    Under Republican leadership in the War on Terror, America’s non-aligned enemy combatants were housed at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Center, commonly referred to as “Gitmo.”

    Now the Democrats have regained power, and has authority over those poor, abused, misunderstood, and not yet proven to be “enemy combatants”…

    it is only fair that we rename said detention center with a name which is more reflective of their ideology. How about “Guano?”

    GUANt-a-n-a-m-O…

96. #96
    On May 4th, 2009 at 7:00 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    it is only fair that we rename said detention center with a name which is more reflective of their ideology. How about “Guano?”

    Awright!!! Paging Col. Bat Guano! We’ve got a job for you!

97. #97
    On May 4th, 2009 at 7:02 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    It ain’t all good yet Obama will restart Military Commissions, protect secrets during civil suits by former detainees, fight extending habaes to Bagram detainees, keep eavesdropping on the enemy without FISA court approval … when will the MSM start referring to him as ‘Bush-light’?

98. #98
    On May 4th, 2009 at 7:09 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    Maybe the White House can hold a jihadi relocation telethon.

    The penguins and walruses took a vote. The good news is Antarctica has no objections to taking all current Gitmo detainees. The best news is they want them delivered on the first day of summer in the northern hemisphere. I’m willing to contribute $1,000 to help pay their way.

99. #99
    On May 4th, 2009 at 8:01 pm, carole said:

    It’s a Fix….This way O can vote present….his hands are tied blah lie blah lie blah

100. #100
     On May 4th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, babiesgrandma said:

     txvet2 said:
     I haven’t heard of many cases in this country where anybody was summarily executed – except, of course on the battlefield and one instance during the Clinton Administration, but they were religious cultists, so they were fair game.

     Was that Vince Foster?