Dear tech execs, you reap what you sow

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 5, 2009 11:36 AM

Yesterday, I noted that Silicon Valley expressed its displeasure with President Obama’s plans to require corporations to pay billions of dollars in U.S. taxes on foreign earnings that they have previously been allowed to defer.

Today, there’s more whining from the tech companies that boosted Obama’s campaign and filled his coffers.

Calll the wahmbulance (hat tip – William Amos):

Carl Guardino usually comes across as an amenable, mild-mannered Silicon Valley executive. But not on Monday. Not when he watched President Obama promising to end overseas tax breaks for U.S. companies that “create a job in Bangalore, India, (rather than) one in Buffalo, N.Y.” Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, angrily described Obama’s language as “not only discouraging, but divisive.” The president’s implication that companies such as Cisco Systems and Hewlett-Packard merely “ship jobs overseas,” and are being rewarded in the bargain, came as a shock to Guardino, who otherwise described the president as “brilliant and respected by so many in the tech sector who are counting on the administration as their ally.”

Indeed, Obama’s proposal to limit U.S. companies’ ability to defer paying U.S. taxes on offshore earnings does put Bay Area companies doing a lot of business overseas directly in the crosshairs. “It would adversely impact our ability to invest and grow our business in the (United States) and to compete against our foreign competitors,” said a spokesman for Cisco.

Google, whose CEO, Eric Schmidt, is supposed to be a close buddy of Obama’s, said it is “too early to evaluate the potential effect on Google’s operations, as there will likely be multiple proposals considered.”

…So, doth Guardino et. al. protest too much? Not according to Atulya Sarin, a professor of finance at Santa Clara University. “It’s a bad idea from the word go,” said Sarin, who has consulted with the Internal Revenue Service and with Fortune 100 companies on international tax issues. “Increasing these taxes will reduce after-tax profits, which will reduce incentives. Right now, the administration should be helping Silicon Valley maintain its competitive edge, not making it less so. I hope saner minds will prevail.”

Reap. Sow. Repeat.

Posted in: Barack Obama, Web 2.0
Printer Friendly
comments (462)   trackbacks (10)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Be Careful What You Wish For « Jane Q. Republican
  2. Obama Redefines Corporate Taxes | NEOAVATARA
  3. Finding Ponies in Piles of Poop
  4. Pelosi Knickers In A Bunch « Vets On The Watch
  5. Terror in New York - Obama will not release photo op pictures « Jim Blazsik
  6. Smoot-Hawley Strikes Back « Track-A-’Crat: The Roll Call of Democratic Delinquency
  7. Six Meat Buffet » Blog Archive » Hey, That’s My Ox!
  8. Were the Chrysler Creditor negotiations withe Obama administration “a farce” or simply Chicago Style politics? | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  9. On Taxes, Obama’s Hypocrisy Impossible To Ignore « Peace and Freedom Promises
  10. No Surprise: Obama Bashes India | NEOAVATARA

Trackback URL

Comments

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

  1. #695608
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Ragspierre said:

    btw: speaking to you is casting pearls before swine..

    Oh, I doubt very seriously that anybody here would mistake your castings for pearls…

  2. #695614
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:21 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Ragspierre said:

    given that all you could do is accuse anyone who disagrees of ‘anti-capitalism’

    I’m surprised you make any money as a lawyer…how many times have you been laughed out of court?

    or do you restrict your lawyer duties to fixing parking tickets?

  3. #695617
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Chaps;

    Was your reference to “‘roid rage” alluding to hemorrhoid rage…?

    I can see how Right might be an epic sufferer, and that would explain a great deal…

  4. #695620
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Ragspierre said

    beter that than alzheimers..

  5. #695624
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:28 pm, Ragspierre said:

    given that all you could do is accuse anyone who disagrees of ‘anti-capitalism’

    But that, like so much of what you have said, is obviously not true.

    I have asked simple, direct questions…

    repeatedly.

    You have shown you cannot answer them. You have displayed your ignorance in crystal clear terms.

    Thank you for participating in our little demonstration.

    BTW, this is what I do for a living. I listen to what people say, ask questions, and prove that their statements are true or false.

    I enjoy that role very, very much.

  6. #695632
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, right4life said:

    I have asked simple, direct questions…

    repeatedly.

    You have shown you cannot answer them. You have displayed your ignorance in crystal clear terms.

    your inability to understand my answer doesn’t mean I didn’t answer….

    Thank you for participating in our little demonstration.

    BTW, this is what I do for a living. I listen to what people say, ask questions, and prove that their statements are true or false.

    I enjoy that role very, very much.

    and you do it very poorly, thats blatantly obvious.

  7. #695634
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, right4life said:

    lets have an example here…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, Ragspierre said:
    why don’t you try to go to China and get a job? just walk right in, and ask for welfare
    You really can’t seem to deal with these questions, can you?

    The question was, do you approve of restrictions by other nations to exclude Americans from their labor force?

    Simple. Just a yes or no. Give it a try.

    you couldn’t answer my question…and I answered your question with …

    The question was, do you approve of restrictions by other nations to exclude Americans from their labor force?
    sure, why not? a country’s first duty is to its OWN citizens…

    now why don’t you just have the guts to admit you’re an open border wacko, and a liar?

    and you responded with…crickets chirping…

  8. #695636
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:40 pm, right4life said:

    oh and you admitted yourself…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Ragspierre said:
    right4life

    I can’t answer all your questions.

    and yet you portray yourself as some kind of economic guru…with an MBA…right…

  9. #695637
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Ragspierre said:

    This thread is a record.

    The record speaks for itself.

    Loudly.

  10. #695638
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, right4life said:

    so in other words, you don’t know, but I’m wrong, cause you like having illegal aliens do your lawn work for little money…or some other equally ridiculous assertion like ‘you are anti-capitalist’ which is a typically vague, unsubstantiated, and ephemeral accusation that means…nothing..

  11. #695639
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Ragspierre said:
    This thread is a record.

    The record speaks for itself.

    Loudly.

    On May 5th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Ragspierre said:
    right4life

    I can’t answer all your questions.

    yep sure does!!

  12. #695640
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, right4life said:

    and of course later you say…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Ragspierre said:
    whats your problem? you admit you cannot answer my questions/scenarios about economics, and yet you pass yourself off as some kind of econ guru???
    I made myself misunderstood. I certainly CAN answer your questions…though I doubt it would avail.

    I don’t have the time or inclination.

    so were you lying previously, or in this post???

    yes an admitted LIAR…the record speaks LOUDLY…you LIAR.

  13. #695646
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, chapoutier said:

    your inability to understand my answer doesn’t mean I didn’t answer….

    I’m sorry. Did you hide the answer to all of those Sowell books you read in your previous posts? Is

    you might want to check the mirror, wacko.

    really mean Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One using some sort of substitution cypher?

  14. #695650
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:51 pm, right4life said:

    I’m sorry. Did you hide the answer to all of those Sowell books you read in your previous posts? Is

    I’m not going to waste my time answering some snide idiotic question.

    and why are you answering for your friend…and why don’t you answer some of my previous questions to you…like why are you SO interested in me??

    why do you cyberstalk me???

  15. #695654
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, chapoutier said:

    I’m not going to waste my time answering some snide idiotic question.

    Translation: None.

  16. #695657
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    like why are you SO interested in me??

    I already answered that. i think you have a fascinating pathology. Kinda like how movies about serial killers are so popular.

  17. #695658
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, right4life said:

    and why are you answering for your friend…and why don’t you answer some of my previous questions to you…like why are you SO interested in me??

    why do you cyberstalk me???

    translation none.

  18. #695659
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, right4life said:

    I already answered that. i think you have a fascinating pathology. Kinda like how movies about serial killers are so popular.

    get a life. and a clue, you will never understand me, but I understand you all too well…

  19. #695663
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, right4life said:

    and why are you answering for your friend…perhaps just another monikor of yours?

  20. #695665
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    God, if I were going to lie about reading some books, I would just freaking google Sowell’s name and throw something out there. That would at least keep your little lie going for a few more posts until Rag’s questioned you on the content.

  21. #695667
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, chapoutier said:

    and why are you answering for your friend…perhaps just another monikor of yours?

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    That is awesome. “Another” moniker? Pray tell, who else do you think I am?

  22. #695672
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, chapoutier said:
    God, if I were going to lie about reading some books, I would just freaking google Sowell’s name and throw something out there. That would at least keep your little lie going for a few more posts until Rag’s questioned you on the content.

    you don’t read and comprehend very well do you?

    That is awesome. “Another” moniker? Pray tell, who else do you think I am?

    given your behavior and cyberstalking, I would not put anything past you…you’re a lawyer…

  23. #695673
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    oh and for a LAWYER to call me a liar?? too funny…its called ‘projection’ mr. psycho (logist) wannabe… :P

  24. #695676
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:07 pm, chapoutier said:

    you don’t read and comprehend very well do you?

    I read quite well. But I can’t read what is not there. Like the names of any of Sowell’s books you have claim to have read.

    given your behavior and cyberstalking, I would not put anything past you…you’re a lawyer…

    Wow. Another question you can’t give a straight answer to.

  25. #695678
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, right4life said:

    I read quite well. But I can’t read what is not there. Like the names of any of Sowell’s books you have claim to have read.

    why should I?

    Wow. Another question you can’t give a straight answer to.

    uh I was trying to be nice…do you really want to hear what I think of you?? isn’t it obvious?

  26. #695680
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, chapoutier said:

    why should I?

    Maybe to salvage a scrap of credibility. Better question is why not?

    do you really want to hear what I think of you?? isn’t it obvious?

    Entirely. But that was not the question, was it sport? I asked what other handles you think I post as here.

  27. #695686
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:16 pm, right4life said:

    Maybe to salvage a scrap of credibility. Better question is why not?

    already explained why not can’t ya read??

    I’m not going to waste my time answering some snide idiotic question.

    I could give a rat’s ass if you think I’m credible…your opinion of me is like something I have to wipe off my shoes….

    I asked what other handles you think I post as here.

    who cares? I’m done.

  28. #695689
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, chapoutier said:

    who cares? I’m done.

    NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

  29. #695714
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Joy said:

    Hysterical…

    After Rags first post questioning right4life I was going to say, “Right4life squealing ‘liar! wacko! must hurt to be so stupid! pearls before swine! in 3-2-1…” but I decided to just watch it unfold. Sorry Rags, I guess I should have warned ya.

    I have never, in all the time I’ve been here seen right4life be able to carry on a rational conversation with anyone who disagrees with him. Doesn’t matter if they are on the left or right, as soon as he is disagreed with, within a couple of posts he disintegrates into these blithering repetitions. Oh, and let’s not leave out repetitious use of :roll: and :P

    It’s AMAZING to watch him misquote people, fail to comprehend them, twist their words, create straw men, contradict his own assertions about what he is saying someone else is saying… and lash out like only a psychotic child would…

    That of a preening narcissist with an ego that bruises easier than a ripe banana.

    Perfect……

    Right4life calling me a LIAR! in 3-2-1…

  30. #695720
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:39 pm, Joy said:

    PS – Did any of you click my amusing little link for the “Th-th-that’s all folks” post? I just want to know if anyone got the not-so-hidden meaning.

  31. #695746
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Joy said:
    Hysterical…

    whats hysterical is your interest in me!!

    I like em UNDER 300lbs..sorry.

    but keep posting….we both know its ALL ABOUT ME!!! :P

  32. #695749
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, right4life said:

    oh and I put the :P in just for you there honey!

  33. #695765
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, chapoutier said:

    PS – Did any of you click my amusing little link for the “Th-th-that’s all folks” post? I just want to know if anyone got the not-so-hidden meaning.

    As in “that’s all folks to any hope of a sane and rational thread conversation?”

  34. #695773
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, right4life said:

    As in “that’s all folks to any hope of a sane and rational thread conversation?”

    no, it was more an admission she’s a fat girl…we’ll just call her ‘porky’

  35. #695797
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, John Deaux said:

    A piece of advice.

    1. Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    I’ll leave it up to you guys to decide if this applies to you.

  36. #695814
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    My, My Chap…Troll-baiting…Again ?
    Go to your room right now.
    :)

  37. #695820
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Joy said:

    Chaps – You missed the Looney-Toons part… and I posted it after his string of phycho posts that goes with what you got from it.

    Right4life – Porky Pig is YOU sputtering “Th-th-that’s all folks” With Looney-Toons over your head.

  38. #695830
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Joy said:

    you’re just desperate for my attention…

  39. #695835
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:50 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Joy said:

    oh I know you didn’t notice, but I made your friend ‘raggy’ look foolish…but you don’t need any help there honey, post away!!

  40. #695840
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, right4life said: I’m you’re just desperate for my attention…

    FIFY

  41. #695845
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    uh yeah sure, lets see, I don’t post to chap, or joy, but both of them come into this thread and are obsessed with me….

    real insightful there sherluck…

    laughable…are you for real???

  42. #695847
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, right4life said:

    oh and jiffy, its not the first time these two wackos have been following me around…

  43. #695855
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:00 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, right4life said:

    Ridiculing my name…That’s classy, all right. Most folks get beyond that by the 3rd grade, or so. This thread is for comments; not life and death to anyone here. responding to you now, is NOT stalking you. And, FWIW , my earlier post, was humorous so, take it in the spirit it was given.
    Jeff, not jiffy.

  44. #695865
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, right4life said:

    Ridiculing my name…That’s classy, all right

    I thought it was appropo…

    maybe you should take your own advise..

    thread is for comments; not life and death to anyone here

    was humorous so, take it in the spirit it was given

    guess you can give it, but not take it…

    responding to you now, is NOT stalking you

    following me around from thread to thread is…

  45. #695872
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, John Deaux said:

    Sixty four more posts and we go over 400!

    Keep the thread alive!

  46. #695874
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    real insightful there sherluck…

    laughable…are you for real???

    Just, humorous ?

  47. #695875
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    following me around from thread to thread is…

    Steroids can also mess with your mind and cause

    “Roid rage”—severe, aggressive behavior that may result in violence, such as fighting or destroying property
    Severe mood swings
    Hallucinations—seeing or hearing things that are not really there
    Paranoia—extreme feelings of mistrust and fear
    Anxiety and panic attacks
    Depression and thoughts of suicide

  48. #695878
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Hey Chap. This IS fun…
    I guess, I’ll go MY room now.
    Bad Jeff…

    :)
    LMAO

  49. #695880
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Joy said:

    :lol:

    Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    :lol:

  50. #695882
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Mayo Clinic Narcissistic Disorder Symptoms.

    Symptoms
    By Mayo Clinic staff

    Narcissistic personality disorder symptoms may include:

    Believing that you’re better than others
    Fantasizing about power, success and attractiveness
    Exaggerating your achievements or talents
    Expecting constant praise and admiration
    Believing that you’re special
    Failing to recognize other people’s emotions and feelings
    Expecting others to go along with your ideas and plans
    Taking advantage of others
    Expressing disdain for those you feel are inferior
    Being jealous of others
    Believing that others are jealous of you
    Trouble keeping healthy relationships
    Setting unrealistic goals
    Being easily hurt and rejected
    Having a fragile self-esteem

  51. #695885
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Joy said:

    No Jeff, don’t go to your room!

    Like John said, keep the thread alive to 400.

    You could post nothing but a “.” and he’d respond…

  52. #695886
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    It’s almost too easy…
    :)

  53. #695887
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Joy said:
    No Jeff, don’t go to your room!

    It’s OK…I have a computer there too…
    LOL

  54. #695892
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Now, I wish I’d signed up as troll-baiter…We have created a monster !

  55. #695901
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:20 pm, John Deaux said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Joy said:
    No Jeff, don’t go to your room!

    Like John said, keep the thread alive to 400.

    You could post nothing but a “.” and he’d respond…

    No I wouldn’t.

    Damn! You know me too well.

  56. #695904
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, chapoutier said:
    following me around from thread to thread is…

    thanks for proving my point!

  57. #695907
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:23 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    .

  58. #695909
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Oops…

    .

  59. #695911
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Joy said:

    Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    no you can’t!!

    you think you’re baiting me…you have no clue!! as usual :lol:

  60. #695914
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    looks like I struck a nerve!! :lol:

  61. #695917
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, right4life said:

    Its been fun playing whack-a-wacko!!

    thanks for playing there losers!!!

    I’m sure I’ll see you tagging along behind me in the next thread!!! :P

  62. #695918
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Yep, we’re clueless yet, you feel obligated to respond…Like a compulsion, or something.

  63. #695920
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Jeff2161 said:
    Yep, we’re clueless yet, you feel obligated to respond…Like a compulsion, or something.

    yeah just like you did!! :lol:

  64. #695921
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Joy said:

    Right4life –

    .

  65. #695922
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    looks like I struck a nerve!!

    Your own. Heh

  66. #695923
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Too funny, Joy !

  67. #695924
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Meanwhile, in Zombie-town…

  68. #695927
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, right4life said:

    its like Pavlov’s dogs…the wackos drool on my command!!

  69. #695944
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Not to worry…right4life…the zombies won’t attack you.

  70. #695945
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    39 more posts.

  71. #695953
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Joy:

    Sorry Rags, I guess I should have warned ya.

    I’m glad you didn’t.

    It would have potentially spoiled the demonstration.

    As I say, the record speaks for itself.

    AND I LOVE PORKY PIG (or his Mexican counter-part…Por Que Pig).

    I knew precisely what you meant!

    Now, may I suggest we have fully and completely shown the mettle of right4life, his/her integrity, and character.

    Further demonstration will simply spiral into an exercise in troll nutrition.

    Fun and addictive as that might be…

  72. #695955
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Joy, I should have noted…the Mexican existentialist Por Que Pig…

  73. #695956
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    you remind me of a dog I used to have that would bark and jump to get my attention…

  74. #695958
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, right4life said:

    As I say, the record speaks for itself.

    it sure does…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Ragspierre said:
    right4life

    I can’t answer all your questions.

    #303On May 6th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, right4life said:
    and of course later you say…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Ragspierre said:
    whats your problem? you admit you cannot answer my questions/scenarios about economics, and yet you pass yourself off as some kind of econ guru???
    I made myself misunderstood. I certainly CAN answer your questions…though I doubt it would avail.

    I don’t have the time or inclination.
    so were you lying previously, or in this post???

    yes an admitted LIAR…the record speaks LOUDLY…you LIAR.

  75. #695960
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm, right4life said:

    I think the above shows your character very fully raggy… :lol:

  76. #695961
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm, Ragspierre said:

    See…???

  77. #695967
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    32 to go…

  78. #695968
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm, Joy said:

    I haven’t laughed this hard in a while.

    Rags – Yep, that’s why I refrained. I knew with your solid, calm disposition that you would handle it well. A perfect study in compare and contrast.

    Have a great day.

  79. #695971
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, right4life said:

    its been fun…gotta run…I know you’ll be lost without me wackos!! :P

    go ahead and keep posting about me!!

    its too funny!!

  80. #695972
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Mom must be picking you up from school.

  81. #695973
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:07 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Awww…

    Com’on guys…

    I had a line already for anyone who asked about Por Que Pig being an existentialist…

    He is the HAMLET of Mexican cartoon characters…!!!!

    HAMlet…

    I kill me…

  82. #695974
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, Joy said:

    Oh, sorry Rags! :lol:

  83. #695981
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:15 pm, Joy said:

    Oh dear… I’m lost.

    .!

  84. #695990
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Scarlet O’Hara…

    Where shall go…???

    What shall I do…???

  85. #695998
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:29 pm, Joy said:

    Tara!

    Tomorrow is another day! I’ll live to stalk him another day!

  86. #696001
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Frankly, mah dear, I do give a damn…!

  87. #696019
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Frankly, mah dear, I do give a ham…!

    FIFY

  88. #696043
    On May 6th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Ah…HAAAA…

    You kill you, too…!!!

  89. #696078
    On May 6th, 2009 at 7:48 pm, right4life said:

    still talking about me after I’m gone!!

    too funny!

    oh well, remember kiddies, its ALL ABOUT ME…

    you either want me, or want to be me…

    but all you will ever be is a wanna-be!!!!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    losers.

  90. #696093
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, John Deaux said:

    Almost there!

  91. #696095
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, John Deaux said:

    .

    That’s pronounced with a spanish accent in honor of Por Que.

  92. #696096
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:41 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    .

    Should quote it…

    17 more…

  93. #696097
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Por Que celebrating Cinco de Quatro, no doubt…

  94. #696100
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    You are both sick, twisted people…

    per i Ode

    .

  95. #696106
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:42 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    You are both sick, twisted people…

    Always room for more…

    14 more…

  96. #696109
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:49 pm, Joy said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, John Deaux said:
    .

    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    .

    Liars! Wackos! I never once said “.”! That would be like casting pearls before SWINE…

    Besides, I know “.” is just baiting me and I don’t take bait, losers!

    You all either want me or want to be me.

    What loser, wacko, liar losers you are. I made you all look dumb. Next to my buff brilliance and way with words you all just come off as the loser liars you are.

    MWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHHHAHAHHHHAHAHAHHA

    Hey! What are you people doing with that white coat?! HEY, you can’t do this to me!

    Wha! WAIT! NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo. Liars! Wackos! Losers! NYAHAHAHA MWAHAHAHAha… What will you do without me? HUH? You NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEd me! YEEEEEEEEEEEAGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    /channeling of right4life

  97. #696112
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:54 pm, Joy said:

    The guys in little white coats are after right4life!

    There coming to take him away!

  98. #696113
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:56 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The dots…

    the dots….!!!!

    …………………………………….

    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

    Agrh! Now they’re morphing….,,,,,,

    :::::::::::::::::::;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    They’ve gone VIRAL….,,,,,:::::;;;;;;;;;;;

  99. #696121
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:27 pm, Joy said:

    The punctuation is plotting against him. It’s stalking him. Baiting him.

    Crying in desperation for his attention.

    It’s all about him, him, HIM.

  100. #696146
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:11 pm, right4life said:

    I think I’m gonna change my monikor to PUPPETMASTER….

    thank God for concealed carry!!

    carry on wackos…remember its all about ME!!

    have you considered bariatric surgery joy? I’ve heard it does wonders…and God knows you need it..

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

Well, now: Anita Dunn’s bully lawyer hubby takes over as White House general counsel

November 12, 2009 11:27 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Don’t get excited: Anita Dunn is not being thrown under the bus

November 10, 2009 12:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, Web 2.0



AmSpecBlog

» A Good Time Not to be a Democrat

Riehl World View

» More Climate Change Fraud: Et Tu New Zealand?

Ed Driscoll

» Charges Filed In Kenneth Gladney Case

The Other McCain

» Alan Colmes, having fun at #1

Riehl World View

» Bet: Ratings Fail - Oprah/Obama Christmas Special

Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Hot Air

» Great news: Oprah to host primetime Obama Christmas special

NewsBusters.org

» Oprah To Do Primetime Christmas Special With The Obamas
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook