Dear tech execs, you reap what you sow

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 5, 2009 11:36 AM

Yesterday, I noted that Silicon Valley expressed its displeasure with President Obama’s plans to require corporations to pay billions of dollars in U.S. taxes on foreign earnings that they have previously been allowed to defer.

Today, there’s more whining from the tech companies that boosted Obama’s campaign and filled his coffers.

Calll the wahmbulance (hat tip – William Amos):

Carl Guardino usually comes across as an amenable, mild-mannered Silicon Valley executive. But not on Monday. Not when he watched President Obama promising to end overseas tax breaks for U.S. companies that “create a job in Bangalore, India, (rather than) one in Buffalo, N.Y.” Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, angrily described Obama’s language as “not only discouraging, but divisive.” The president’s implication that companies such as Cisco Systems and Hewlett-Packard merely “ship jobs overseas,” and are being rewarded in the bargain, came as a shock to Guardino, who otherwise described the president as “brilliant and respected by so many in the tech sector who are counting on the administration as their ally.”

Indeed, Obama’s proposal to limit U.S. companies’ ability to defer paying U.S. taxes on offshore earnings does put Bay Area companies doing a lot of business overseas directly in the crosshairs. “It would adversely impact our ability to invest and grow our business in the (United States) and to compete against our foreign competitors,” said a spokesman for Cisco.

Google, whose CEO, Eric Schmidt, is supposed to be a close buddy of Obama’s, said it is “too early to evaluate the potential effect on Google’s operations, as there will likely be multiple proposals considered.”

…So, doth Guardino et. al. protest too much? Not according to Atulya Sarin, a professor of finance at Santa Clara University. “It’s a bad idea from the word go,” said Sarin, who has consulted with the Internal Revenue Service and with Fortune 100 companies on international tax issues. “Increasing these taxes will reduce after-tax profits, which will reduce incentives. Right now, the administration should be helping Silicon Valley maintain its competitive edge, not making it less so. I hope saner minds will prevail.”

Reap. Sow. Repeat.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Barack Obama,Web 2.0
Printer Friendly
comments (462)  

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

  1. #301
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, right4life said:

    so in other words, you don’t know, but I’m wrong, cause you like having illegal aliens do your lawn work for little money…or some other equally ridiculous assertion like ‘you are anti-capitalist’ which is a typically vague, unsubstantiated, and ephemeral accusation that means…nothing..

  2. #302
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Ragspierre said:
    This thread is a record.

    The record speaks for itself.

    Loudly.

    On May 5th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Ragspierre said:
    right4life

    I can’t answer all your questions.

    yep sure does!!

  3. #303
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, right4life said:

    and of course later you say…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Ragspierre said:
    whats your problem? you admit you cannot answer my questions/scenarios about economics, and yet you pass yourself off as some kind of econ guru???
    I made myself misunderstood. I certainly CAN answer your questions…though I doubt it would avail.

    I don’t have the time or inclination.

    so were you lying previously, or in this post???

    yes an admitted LIAR…the record speaks LOUDLY…you LIAR.

  4. #304
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, chapoutier said:

    your inability to understand my answer doesn’t mean I didn’t answer….

    I’m sorry. Did you hide the answer to all of those Sowell books you read in your previous posts? Is

    you might want to check the mirror, wacko.

    really mean Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One using some sort of substitution cypher?

  5. #305
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:51 pm, right4life said:

    I’m sorry. Did you hide the answer to all of those Sowell books you read in your previous posts? Is

    I’m not going to waste my time answering some snide idiotic question.

    and why are you answering for your friend…and why don’t you answer some of my previous questions to you…like why are you SO interested in me??

    why do you cyberstalk me???

  6. #306
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, chapoutier said:

    I’m not going to waste my time answering some snide idiotic question.

    Translation: None.

  7. #307
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    like why are you SO interested in me??

    I already answered that. i think you have a fascinating pathology. Kinda like how movies about serial killers are so popular.

  8. #308
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, right4life said:

    and why are you answering for your friend…and why don’t you answer some of my previous questions to you…like why are you SO interested in me??

    why do you cyberstalk me???

    translation none.

  9. #309
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, right4life said:

    I already answered that. i think you have a fascinating pathology. Kinda like how movies about serial killers are so popular.

    get a life. and a clue, you will never understand me, but I understand you all too well…

  10. #310
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, right4life said:

    and why are you answering for your friend…perhaps just another monikor of yours?

  11. #311
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    God, if I were going to lie about reading some books, I would just freaking google Sowell’s name and throw something out there. That would at least keep your little lie going for a few more posts until Rag’s questioned you on the content.

  12. #312
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, chapoutier said:

    and why are you answering for your friend…perhaps just another monikor of yours?

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    That is awesome. “Another” moniker? Pray tell, who else do you think I am?

  13. #313
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, chapoutier said:
    God, if I were going to lie about reading some books, I would just freaking google Sowell’s name and throw something out there. That would at least keep your little lie going for a few more posts until Rag’s questioned you on the content.

    you don’t read and comprehend very well do you?

    That is awesome. “Another” moniker? Pray tell, who else do you think I am?

    given your behavior and cyberstalking, I would not put anything past you…you’re a lawyer…

  14. #314
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    oh and for a LAWYER to call me a liar?? too funny…its called ‘projection’ mr. psycho (logist) wannabe… :P

  15. #315
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:07 pm, chapoutier said:

    you don’t read and comprehend very well do you?

    I read quite well. But I can’t read what is not there. Like the names of any of Sowell’s books you have claim to have read.

    given your behavior and cyberstalking, I would not put anything past you…you’re a lawyer…

    Wow. Another question you can’t give a straight answer to.

  16. #316
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, right4life said:

    I read quite well. But I can’t read what is not there. Like the names of any of Sowell’s books you have claim to have read.

    why should I?

    Wow. Another question you can’t give a straight answer to.

    uh I was trying to be nice…do you really want to hear what I think of you?? isn’t it obvious?

  17. #317
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, chapoutier said:

    why should I?

    Maybe to salvage a scrap of credibility. Better question is why not?

    do you really want to hear what I think of you?? isn’t it obvious?

    Entirely. But that was not the question, was it sport? I asked what other handles you think I post as here.

  18. #318
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:16 pm, right4life said:

    Maybe to salvage a scrap of credibility. Better question is why not?

    already explained why not can’t ya read??

    I’m not going to waste my time answering some snide idiotic question.

    I could give a rat’s ass if you think I’m credible…your opinion of me is like something I have to wipe off my shoes….

    I asked what other handles you think I post as here.

    who cares? I’m done.

  19. #319
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, chapoutier said:

    who cares? I’m done.

    NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

  20. #320
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Joy said:

    Hysterical…

    After Rags first post questioning right4life I was going to say, “Right4life squealing ‘liar! wacko! must hurt to be so stupid! pearls before swine! in 3-2-1…” but I decided to just watch it unfold. Sorry Rags, I guess I should have warned ya.

    I have never, in all the time I’ve been here seen right4life be able to carry on a rational conversation with anyone who disagrees with him. Doesn’t matter if they are on the left or right, as soon as he is disagreed with, within a couple of posts he disintegrates into these blithering repetitions. Oh, and let’s not leave out repetitious use of :roll: and :P

    It’s AMAZING to watch him misquote people, fail to comprehend them, twist their words, create straw men, contradict his own assertions about what he is saying someone else is saying… and lash out like only a psychotic child would…

    That of a preening narcissist with an ego that bruises easier than a ripe banana.

    Perfect……

    Right4life calling me a LIAR! in 3-2-1…

  21. #321
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:39 pm, Joy said:

    PS – Did any of you click my amusing little link for the “Th-th-that’s all folks” post? I just want to know if anyone got the not-so-hidden meaning.

  22. #322
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Joy said:
    Hysterical…

    whats hysterical is your interest in me!!

    I like em UNDER 300lbs..sorry.

    but keep posting….we both know its ALL ABOUT ME!!! :P

  23. #323
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, right4life said:

    oh and I put the :P in just for you there honey!

  24. #324
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, chapoutier said:

    PS – Did any of you click my amusing little link for the “Th-th-that’s all folks” post? I just want to know if anyone got the not-so-hidden meaning.

    As in “that’s all folks to any hope of a sane and rational thread conversation?”

  25. #325
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, right4life said:

    As in “that’s all folks to any hope of a sane and rational thread conversation?”

    no, it was more an admission she’s a fat girl…we’ll just call her ‘porky’

  26. #326
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, John Deaux said:

    A piece of advice.

    1. Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    I’ll leave it up to you guys to decide if this applies to you.

  27. #327
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    My, My Chap…Troll-baiting…Again ?
    Go to your room right now.
    :)

  28. #328
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Joy said:

    Chaps – You missed the Looney-Toons part… and I posted it after his string of phycho posts that goes with what you got from it.

    Right4life – Porky Pig is YOU sputtering “Th-th-that’s all folks” With Looney-Toons over your head.

  29. #329
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Joy said:

    you’re just desperate for my attention…

  30. #330
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:50 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Joy said:

    oh I know you didn’t notice, but I made your friend ‘raggy’ look foolish…but you don’t need any help there honey, post away!!

  31. #331
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, right4life said: I’m you’re just desperate for my attention…

    FIFY

  32. #332
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    uh yeah sure, lets see, I don’t post to chap, or joy, but both of them come into this thread and are obsessed with me….

    real insightful there sherluck…

    laughable…are you for real???

  33. #333
    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, right4life said:

    oh and jiffy, its not the first time these two wackos have been following me around…

  34. #334
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:00 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, right4life said:

    Ridiculing my name…That’s classy, all right. Most folks get beyond that by the 3rd grade, or so. This thread is for comments; not life and death to anyone here. responding to you now, is NOT stalking you. And, FWIW , my earlier post, was humorous so, take it in the spirit it was given.
    Jeff, not jiffy.

  35. #335
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, right4life said:

    Ridiculing my name…That’s classy, all right

    I thought it was appropo…

    maybe you should take your own advise..

    thread is for comments; not life and death to anyone here

    was humorous so, take it in the spirit it was given

    guess you can give it, but not take it…

    responding to you now, is NOT stalking you

    following me around from thread to thread is…

  36. #336
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, John Deaux said:

    Sixty four more posts and we go over 400!

    Keep the thread alive!

  37. #337
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    real insightful there sherluck…

    laughable…are you for real???

    Just, humorous ?

  38. #338
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    following me around from thread to thread is…

    Steroids can also mess with your mind and cause

    “Roid rage”—severe, aggressive behavior that may result in violence, such as fighting or destroying property
    Severe mood swings
    Hallucinations—seeing or hearing things that are not really there
    Paranoia—extreme feelings of mistrust and fear
    Anxiety and panic attacks
    Depression and thoughts of suicide

  39. #339
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Hey Chap. This IS fun…
    I guess, I’ll go MY room now.
    Bad Jeff…

    :)
    LMAO

  40. #340
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Joy said:

    :lol:

    Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    :lol:

  41. #341
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Mayo Clinic Narcissistic Disorder Symptoms.

    Symptoms
    By Mayo Clinic staff

    Narcissistic personality disorder symptoms may include:

    Believing that you’re better than others
    Fantasizing about power, success and attractiveness
    Exaggerating your achievements or talents
    Expecting constant praise and admiration
    Believing that you’re special
    Failing to recognize other people’s emotions and feelings
    Expecting others to go along with your ideas and plans
    Taking advantage of others
    Expressing disdain for those you feel are inferior
    Being jealous of others
    Believing that others are jealous of you
    Trouble keeping healthy relationships
    Setting unrealistic goals
    Being easily hurt and rejected
    Having a fragile self-esteem

  42. #342
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Joy said:

    No Jeff, don’t go to your room!

    Like John said, keep the thread alive to 400.

    You could post nothing but a “.” and he’d respond…

  43. #343
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    It’s almost too easy…
    :)

  44. #344
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Joy said:
    No Jeff, don’t go to your room!

    It’s OK…I have a computer there too…
    LOL

  45. #345
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Now, I wish I’d signed up as troll-baiter…We have created a monster !

  46. #346
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:20 pm, John Deaux said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, Joy said:
    No Jeff, don’t go to your room!

    Like John said, keep the thread alive to 400.

    You could post nothing but a “.” and he’d respond…

    No I wouldn’t.

    Damn! You know me too well.

  47. #347
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, chapoutier said:
    following me around from thread to thread is…

    thanks for proving my point!

  48. #348
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:23 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    .

  49. #349
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Oops…

    .

  50. #350
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Joy said:

    Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    no you can’t!!

    you think you’re baiting me…you have no clue!! as usual :lol:

  51. #351
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    looks like I struck a nerve!! :lol:

  52. #352
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, right4life said:

    Its been fun playing whack-a-wacko!!

    thanks for playing there losers!!!

    I’m sure I’ll see you tagging along behind me in the next thread!!! :P

  53. #353
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Yep, we’re clueless yet, you feel obligated to respond…Like a compulsion, or something.

  54. #354
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Jeff2161 said:
    Yep, we’re clueless yet, you feel obligated to respond…Like a compulsion, or something.

    yeah just like you did!! :lol:

  55. #355
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Joy said:

    Right4life –

    .

  56. #356
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    looks like I struck a nerve!!

    Your own. Heh

  57. #357
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Too funny, Joy !

  58. #358
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Meanwhile, in Zombie-town…

  59. #359
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, right4life said:

    its like Pavlov’s dogs…the wackos drool on my command!!

  60. #360
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Not to worry…right4life…the zombies won’t attack you.

  61. #361
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    39 more posts.

  62. #362
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Joy:

    Sorry Rags, I guess I should have warned ya.

    I’m glad you didn’t.

    It would have potentially spoiled the demonstration.

    As I say, the record speaks for itself.

    AND I LOVE PORKY PIG (or his Mexican counter-part…Por Que Pig).

    I knew precisely what you meant!

    Now, may I suggest we have fully and completely shown the mettle of right4life, his/her integrity, and character.

    Further demonstration will simply spiral into an exercise in troll nutrition.

    Fun and addictive as that might be…

  63. #363
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Joy, I should have noted…the Mexican existentialist Por Que Pig…

  64. #364
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, right4life said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    you remind me of a dog I used to have that would bark and jump to get my attention…

  65. #365
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, right4life said:

    As I say, the record speaks for itself.

    it sure does…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Ragspierre said:
    right4life

    I can’t answer all your questions.

    #303On May 6th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, right4life said:
    and of course later you say…

    On May 5th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Ragspierre said:
    whats your problem? you admit you cannot answer my questions/scenarios about economics, and yet you pass yourself off as some kind of econ guru???
    I made myself misunderstood. I certainly CAN answer your questions…though I doubt it would avail.

    I don’t have the time or inclination.
    so were you lying previously, or in this post???

    yes an admitted LIAR…the record speaks LOUDLY…you LIAR.

  66. #366
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm, right4life said:

    I think the above shows your character very fully raggy… :lol:

  67. #367
    On May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm, Ragspierre said:

    See…???

  68. #368
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    32 to go…

  69. #369
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm, Joy said:

    I haven’t laughed this hard in a while.

    Rags – Yep, that’s why I refrained. I knew with your solid, calm disposition that you would handle it well. A perfect study in compare and contrast.

    Have a great day.

  70. #370
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, right4life said:

    its been fun…gotta run…I know you’ll be lost without me wackos!! :P

    go ahead and keep posting about me!!

    its too funny!!

  71. #371
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Mom must be picking you up from school.

  72. #372
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:07 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Awww…

    Com’on guys…

    I had a line already for anyone who asked about Por Que Pig being an existentialist…

    He is the HAMLET of Mexican cartoon characters…!!!!

    HAMlet…

    I kill me…

  73. #373
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, Joy said:

    Oh, sorry Rags! :lol:

  74. #374
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:15 pm, Joy said:

    Oh dear… I’m lost.

    .!

  75. #375
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Scarlet O’Hara…

    Where shall go…???

    What shall I do…???

  76. #376
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:29 pm, Joy said:

    Tara!

    Tomorrow is another day! I’ll live to stalk him another day!

  77. #377
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Frankly, mah dear, I do give a damn…!

  78. #378
    On May 6th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Frankly, mah dear, I do give a ham…!

    FIFY

  79. #379
    On May 6th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Ah…HAAAA…

    You kill you, too…!!!

  80. #380
    On May 6th, 2009 at 7:48 pm, right4life said:

    still talking about me after I’m gone!!

    too funny!

    oh well, remember kiddies, its ALL ABOUT ME…

    you either want me, or want to be me…

    but all you will ever be is a wanna-be!!!!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    losers.

  81. #381
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, John Deaux said:

    Almost there!

  82. #382
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, John Deaux said:

    .

    That’s pronounced with a spanish accent in honor of Por Que.

  83. #383
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:41 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    .

    Should quote it…

    17 more…

  84. #384
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Por Que celebrating Cinco de Quatro, no doubt…

  85. #385
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    You are both sick, twisted people…

    per i Ode

    .

  86. #386
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:42 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    You are both sick, twisted people…

    Always room for more…

    14 more…

  87. #387
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:49 pm, Joy said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, John Deaux said:
    .

    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    .

    Liars! Wackos! I never once said “.”! That would be like casting pearls before SWINE…

    Besides, I know “.” is just baiting me and I don’t take bait, losers!

    You all either want me or want to be me.

    What loser, wacko, liar losers you are. I made you all look dumb. Next to my buff brilliance and way with words you all just come off as the loser liars you are.

    MWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHHHAHAHHHHAHAHAHHA

    Hey! What are you people doing with that white coat?! HEY, you can’t do this to me!

    Wha! WAIT! NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo. Liars! Wackos! Losers! NYAHAHAHA MWAHAHAHAha… What will you do without me? HUH? You NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEd me! YEEEEEEEEEEEAGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    /channeling of right4life

  88. #388
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:54 pm, Joy said:

    The guys in little white coats are after right4life!

    There coming to take him away!

  89. #389
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:56 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The dots…

    the dots….!!!!

    …………………………………….

    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

    Agrh! Now they’re morphing….,,,,,,

    :::::::::::::::::::;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    They’ve gone VIRAL….,,,,,:::::;;;;;;;;;;;

  90. #390
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:27 pm, Joy said:

    The punctuation is plotting against him. It’s stalking him. Baiting him.

    Crying in desperation for his attention.

    It’s all about him, him, HIM.

  91. #391
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:11 pm, right4life said:

    I think I’m gonna change my monikor to PUPPETMASTER….

    thank God for concealed carry!!

    carry on wackos…remember its all about ME!!

    have you considered bariatric surgery joy? I’ve heard it does wonders…and God knows you need it..

  92. #392
    On May 7th, 2009 at 12:08 am, Joy said:

    And I’m fat! Boy, he sure let me have it! How can anyone argue with such pure intellect?

    Zounds… Buff and smart! Who wouldn’t want him or want to be him?

  93. #393
    On May 7th, 2009 at 12:30 am, Jeff2161 said:

    Who wouldn’t want him or want to be him?

    Trick question…

    .

  94. #394
    On May 7th, 2009 at 12:31 am, Jeff2161 said:

    Only 6 more posts…

  95. #395
    On May 7th, 2009 at 12:49 am, Joy said:

    This has got to be, hands down, the weirdest MM thread e-vah!

    5 more posts…

  96. #396
    On May 7th, 2009 at 1:03 am, Ragspierre said:

    This is the thread that goes on forever….

  97. #397
    On May 7th, 2009 at 1:57 am, Joy said:

    Okay, when I get up tomorrow I expect to see the last 3 posts!

    .

  98. #398
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:25 am, John Deaux said:

    Far be it from me to disprove Godwin’s law.

    . = Hitler

  99. #399
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:26 am, John Deaux said:

    So who wants number 400?

  100. #400
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:36 am, Ragspierre said:

    Eww…

    Ewww…

    LET ME….!!!

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs

February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers

50 Comments

Stealth altruism

Report: Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to Entity with Close Ties to Investors

February 9, 2012 10:08 AM by Doug Powers

49 Comments

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

Middle Class Payroll Tax Cut Extension Comes Courtesy of Mortgage Fees on Home Buyers

February 6, 2012 01:36 PM by Doug Powers

35 Comments

Hiring Spree in NYC

February 1, 2012 02:47 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants

January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama and Jan Brewer Have Words on Airport Tarmac; Update: Brewer Book Sales Skyrocket

January 25, 2012 09:54 PM by Doug Powers

165 Comments

Book-Critic-in-Chief takes issue

Warren Buffett’s Secretary to Sit with First Lady at State of the Union Speech

January 24, 2012 12:35 PM by Doug Powers

93 Comments


Categories: Barack Obama,Web 2.0

iPhone/iPad
Android
Amazon (Android)

Pundit & Pundette

» Obama's war on conscience, cont'd

Redstate

» Media Matters

Hot Air

» National Review to Newt: Get out

AmSpecBlog

» Explosion Near Israeli Embassy in India

Hot Air

» New Obama chief of staff strangely ignorant of budget process on Capitol Hill

Hot Air

» Is the White House manipulating the media through Media Matters?

NRO

» Santorum’s Turn

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook