Obama’s transparency policy: Don’t let the sunshine in

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 6, 2009 08:38 AM

My column today follows up on the taxpayer-subsidized photos of the Scare Force One flyover that the White House doesn’t want us to see. Look how the administration responded to press questions yesterday:

At the daily press briefing, a reporter asked Mr. Gibbs why the White House had not authorized release of the photographs.

“I’ve watched CNN. I didn’t notice a lack of archival material from that flight,” Mr. Gibbs said.

“No, from inside the plane,” a reporter replied. “The photos they took, we haven’t seen those.”

“I don’t know where those are,” Mr. Gibbs said.

Greatest Transparency Ever!

This story is not going away.

Update: Flip-flop. They’re not off the hook yet.

***
The selective transparency of Barack Obama
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

Sunlight is for suckers. The New York Post reported on Tuesday that the White House will not release the $328,835 snapshots taken of the president’s Boeing VC-25A that buzzed lower Manhattan. The entire world has seen news and amateur photos and videos of the incident. But if President Obama has his way, taxpayers won’t be able to see the flyover photos they paid for with their own money.

This will make for an interesting response to my Freedom of Information Act requests. After the bizarre mission caused distress and panic among countless New York City residents who were intentionally left in the dark about the photo-op stunt, I filed two public records requests with the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff FOIA Requester Service Center. The first one requests any and all communication — including e-mail and other public records and including any and all correspondence between the White House Military Office, Department of Defense, and other agencies — related to the planned federal aerial mission over New York City on April 27, 2009. Specifically, I requested all public records related to and including the flight manifests, and related to the origin of the request for the mission. The second filing requests any and all photos taken during the planned federal aerial mission approved by the White House Military Office.

What rationale could they possibly use to stifle public disclosure? National security? These were glamour shots to enhance the Air Force One photo portfolio. That’s no secret. The White House ‘fessed up on that. Withholding the photos serves only one purpose: protecting the backsides of those involved in this botched p.r. mission.

From Day One, President Obama has demonstrated a rather self-serving selectivity when it comes to transparency. The Obama White House rushed to reverse an 18-year ban photographing the flag-draped coffins of troops arriving back on American soil. And at the behest of the American Civil Liberties Union, his administration is set to release at least 21 classified photographs by May 28 showing detainee abuse in prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Openness in government is fine if it hurts America’s reputation, but not if it harms Obama’s.

Moreover, hostility to transparency is a running thread through Obama’s cabinet:

• Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for years fought disclosure of massive donations from foreign governments and corporations who filled her husband’s library and foundation coffers.

• Top Obama advisor David Axelrod ran fear-mongering astro-turf campaigns in support of a huge utility rate hike – and failed to disclose that the ads were funded for Commonwealth Edison in Chicago.

• Labor Secretary Hilda Solis failed to disclose that she was director and treasurer of a union-promoting lobbying group pushing legislation that she was co-sponsoring.

• Attorney General Eric Holder overruled his own lawyers in the Justice Department over the issue of D.C. voting rights (which he and President Obama support) and refused to make public the staffers’ opinion that a House bill on the matter was unconstitutional.

• And as I reported last month, Obama’s nominee for the No. 2 official at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, former King County, Wash. Executive Ron Sims, has the distinction of being the most fined government official in his state’s history for suppressing public records from taxpayers.

President Obama set the tone, breaking his transparency pledge with the very first bill he signed into law. On January 29, the White House announced that Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act had been posted online for review. One problem: Obama had already signed it – in violation of his “sunlight before signing” pledge to post legislation for public comment on the White House website five days before he sealed any deal.

Obama broke the pledge again with the mad rush to pass his trillion-dollar, pork-stuffed stimulus package full of earmarks he denied existed. Jim Harper of the Cato Institute reported in April 2009: “Of the eleven bills President Obama has signed, only six have been posted on Whitehouse.gov. None have been posted for a full five days after presentment from Congress…”

It’s this utter disregard for taxpayer accountability that prompted hundreds of thousands of citizens to take to the streets on Tax Day 2009 for Tea Party protests. The trampling of transparency inspired signs that read: “No legislation without deliberation” and “READ THE BILL FIRST.” Obama’s response was first to claim that he hadn’t even heard of the Tea Party movement and then, on his 100-day celebration, to deride all those Americans he is supposed to represent of “playing games.”

Projection, anyone? When it comes to toying with transparency, President Obama is a master at “playing games.”

Posted in: Barack Obama, Tea Party

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Transparency in Obama’s Government « Popgun’s World
  2. The Truth Is: Team Obama and The National Media Have To Grow Up Fast « Peace and Freedom Promises
  3. Obama Refuses to Release Photos from ‘Secret’ NYC Flyover That Terrified New Yorkers… ‘Era of Transparency’ Gets Murky « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  4. Obama, Tell Me Lies… Tell Me Sweet Little Lies « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  5. Terror in New York - Obama will not release photo op pictures « Jim Blazsik
  6. Let The Sun Shine, Let The Sun Shine In « Vets On The Watch
  7. Why “the recession is over.” | The Anchoress
  8. Finger in Scare Force One Photos Prompts Obama Middle Finger
  9. Enough of the Nonsense & Secrecy, Mr. President: Journalist Michelle Malkin Files ‘Freedom of Information Act’ Requests for Public Records on NYC Flyover « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  10. Dangerously Incompetent « Urbin Report
  11. DSP: Obama’s transparency policy: Don’t let the sunshine in | Democrat Socialist Party
  12. Professor Athena: Ineffectual Rhymes with Intellectual « Temple of Mut
  13. God Bless, Obama! « Peace and Freedom Promises
  14. The so called Obama administration ‘transparency’ | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  15. Mudville Gazette
  16. $328,835 Snapshots Not Released: Hey what’s money when you are printing it! « Dianej’s Weblog
  17. Michelle Malkin » Flip-flop: White House to release “a photo” of Scare Force One flyover
  18. White House to Release Photo From New York Flyover « Peace and Freedom Promises
  19. Steynian 352 « Free Canuckistan!
  20. Michelle Malkin: The Selective Transparency of Obama; Scare Force One Pics are Requested through FOIA by numerous sources « Just Americans Making Ethical Statements Weblog
  21. Obama Gang Freaks Out New York City With 9/11 Plane Stunt « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  22. Transparency. « Little Platoons
  23. FOIA Request Filed by <i>Unequal Time</i> for Photos from Air Force One NYC Fly-over | Unequal Time
  24. Michelle Malkin: The Selective Transparency of Obama; Scare Force One Pics are Requested through FOIA by numerous sources | New World News
  25. DSP: Obama’s transparency policy: Don’t let the sunshine in | Democrat Socialist Party : Democrat Socialist Party
  26. » LOC 12: I Took A Malkin Left Of Center: Internet Radio Where Nothing Is Sacred.
  27. Unexpected Criticism from Camille Paglia: ‘Simpering WH Press Sec. Robert Gibbs Should Be Fired for Dismissive Attitude of NYC Air Force One Flyover’ « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  28. The Greenroom » Forum Archive » Transparency Update
  29. Slublog
  30. Air Force One Flyover FOIA Update, Part Deux | Unequal Time
  31. Another Negative 2 — Obama’s Approval Rating Index Continues to Tank « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  32. Michelle Malkin » Friday Photo Dump: Defense Dept. releases a pile of Manhattan fly-by pics, manifest
  33. They Can’t Even be Transparent About Sweet Potatoes!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:48 am, coffee said:

    We’ll eventually get those overpriced photos, but Gibbs will always be a clueless looking, arrogant White House tool.

  2. #2
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:48 am, Lindsay said:

    Sic ‘em, Michelle!

  3. #3
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:53 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Sunshine is only necessary when showing off his magnificent glistening pecs!

    Why waste the light otherwise?

  4. #4
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:56 am, Old Tanker said:

    Ya, but we have to release MORE Abu Ghraib photos that might actually make soldiers look bad and help motivate more terrorists……but we can’t have the POTUS looking bad now can we……

  5. #5
    On May 6th, 2009 at 8:58 am, Ragspierre said:

    Excellent!

    You are liable to make someone mad.

    Git er done!!!

  6. #6
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:02 am, hitcharide said:

    Is there anything that isn’t skin deep on this guy? From his culture to his ethics to his so-called “open government,” top that off with a heavy overdose of arrogance, elitism and entitlement, and you’re left with the classic narcissist liberal who gives rights to himself that don’t even exist while denying the most basic rights to everyone else. He won’t release these pics for the sole reason he doesn’t want to…he feels himself unaccountable to anyone for anything, and he knows it’s just a tad unlikely congress or msm will hold him to account. Good luck to you MM in your efforts.

  7. #7
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:04 am, MrOlympia said:

    The American Dictator and his thugs are winning. The American people are losing.

  8. #8
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:06 am, cpodug said:

    Greatest Transparency Ever!

    It all depends on what your definition of “transparency” is. After all, as Humpty Dumpty said to Alice, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more or less.”

  9. #10
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:17 am, Cogs said:

    Good luck. The real fight here is the MSM. Docs received through FOIA don’t mean much if the corrupt MSM ignores their charge.

  10. #11
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:19 am, vsatt said:

    The pics probably show Obama gazing out the window at the Statue of Liberty as they buzzed it during this photo shoot that he knew nothing about.

  11. #12
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:21 am, Cathy B said:

    Ya, what vsatt said!

  12. #13
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:23 am, ajmontana said:

    I still can’t believe people voted for this dill weed.

  13. #14
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:25 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    the cockroach in the wh and its minions are simply put, morons. transparency, classified, yeah, right.

  14. #15
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:30 am, chapoutier said:

    “No, from inside the plane,” a reporter replied. “The photos they took, we haven’t seen those.”

    Maybe I missed something. I thought the photos were being taken of the outside of the plane from a fighter jet. Is there any evidence of a camera being used inside the plane?

  15. #16
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:31 am, rainbow said:

    You know someone on that plane will eventually sell cell phone pictures to National Enquirer or somewhere. I bet BHO and his cronies were on that plane laughing their heads off. Do we as taxpayers get our money back if they don’t release those photos? What a waste of taxpayer money! I wonder what TOTUS has to say about this today???

  16. #17
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:33 am, spaceycakes said:

    “I’ve watched CNN. I didn’t notice a lack of archival material from that flight,” Mr. Gibbs said.

    WTH? Is CNN the official medium of the State now? Mr. Gibbs needs to get out more…

  17. #18
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:34 am, chapoutier said:

    I bet BHO and his cronies were on that plane laughing their heads off.

    Except that Obama was giving a public speech, on camera, at the time.

  18. #21
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:36 am, rainbow said:

    I thought he could do more than one thing at a time? I forgot about his public appearance(s). . .so many I can’t keep up!

  19. #22
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Keep up the pressure Michelle. Good Job!

    Last week there was a comment about the flight being similar to the ‘Lincoln bedroom’ ….and I can’t help from thinking of movies that are being made(?) about the glorious BHO’s life.

    Can’t wait to find out the truth about this. And I still don’t know why a leak hasn’t occurred.

  20. #23
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am, Savage24 said:

    This clown has been in office for a little over a hunderd days, he’s already made over a hundred mistakes, but he is still running against Bush. What is good for the goose is not necessarily good for the gander.

  21. #24
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:38 am, sambo said:

    spaceycakes said:
    WTH? Is CNN the official medium of the State now? Mr. Gibbs needs to get out more…

    Not yet…but soon!
    BTW. As Obama’s head art dude said…the White House loves MSNBC!

  22. #25
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:42 am, spaceycakes said:

    I thought the photos were being taken of the outside of the plane from a fighter jet.

    I would hope the pilot of an F-16 would be busy flying the jet, rather than taking candid photos…and, there’s not room for another person in that configured cockpit, but hey, I could be wrong…

  23. #27
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:46 am, Katycue said:

    Surely this was something more than a photo shoot…wasn’t it? That just makes no sense to me…

  24. #28
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:47 am, gridlock said:

    minitrue workreq 05/05/10/08:17.25

    04/27/09 miniwar photfile nyc af1 specmis doubleplusungood refs nonevent.

    rectify photfile update puppy and update hand-hold.

    antesub presscorps standard coop

  25. #29
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:51 am, jangar said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am, Savage24 said:
    This clown has been in office for a little over a hunderd days, he’s already made over a hundred mistakes

    And America made one BIG one.

    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:46 am, Katycue said:
    Surely this was something more than a photo shoot…wasn’t it? That just makes no sense to me…

    I don’t buy the BS for one minute either. Snipe hunt down a rabbit trail.

    Maybe George of the Hut wanted a quick ride.

  26. #30
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:54 am, cicerokid said:

    “I’ve watched CNN. I didn’t notice a lack of archival material from that flight,” Mr. Gibbs said.

    He doesn’t watch Fox? I guess CNN really does stand for “Communist News network”.

    I’m with Michelle on this one: just show me the flight manifest and the photos, please. We’ll work on the college transcripts, passports, and birth records later.

  27. #31
    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:59 am, John Deaux said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:42 am, spaceycakes said:
    I thought the photos were being taken of the outside of the plane from a fighter jet.
    I would hope the pilot of an F-16 would be busy flying the jet, rather than taking candid photos…and, there’s not room for another person in that configured cockpit, but hey, I could be wrong…

    And both hands are required to fly the plane. If the pilot releases the joystick with his right hand, the plane automatically trims out to level flight.

    On another note, if someone were to take those released photos of AbuGhraib and put them on a t-shirt and wear it around town, would that be a hate crime?

  28. #32
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:01 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Spaceycakes,

    Apparently one of the F-16 was equipped with a camera.

    One of the fighter jets peeled away while the second F-16, equipped with a camera, spent 30 minutes taking photos of the Boeing 747 over the city skyline.

  29. #35
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:03 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    F-16s

  30. #36
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:04 am, Flyoverman said:

    I do not really care to see the photos of the aircraft over New York.

    However, I am VERY VERY VERY interested in any photographs taken INSIDE the aircraft. I would also LOVE to see the passenger manifest of who was on board that aircraft.

    That is what the story may be IMHO. We could find it was the Great Lincoln Bedroom in the sky joyride for high rolling Obama donors.

  31. #37
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:05 am, WoodyP said:

    Great column! Eventually the MSM will get fed up with the Obama Administration and do their jobs, but it will take work like this to force the issue.

  32. #38
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:05 am, beachmom said:

    MM said:Openness in government is fine if it hurts America’s reputation, but not if it harms Obama’s.

    That right there explains a lot about this administration.

  33. #39
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:09 am, jangar said:

    That is what the story may be IMHO. We could find it was the Great Lincoln Bedroom in the sky joyride for high rolling Obama donors.

    Middle Eastern land surveyors?

  34. #40
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:13 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Middle Eastern land surveyors?

    Yes, leveled for horse racing.

  35. #41
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:13 am, Thunderbird 1 said:

    I am so proud of you, Michelle. Thank you for doing this.

    This story has stuck in my craw since it happened, in part because I was in mid-air on a New England-to-westerly flight precisely while the 9/11 passengers were saying their last prayers headed toward the towers. And because my wife, a UAL f/a, could easily have met the fate of the brave crews on those plans.

    Heads should and better roll over this. Thanks for keeping up the pressure.

  36. #42
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:14 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    That ain’t all. Apparently Sheriff Joe who was going to track every dime of porkulushas had a change of assignment.

    Add that to tomorrow’s the lack of disclosure on toxic assets from the “stress tests”, there sure isn’t much sunshine coming out of Washington these days.

  37. #43
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am, DBNinKY said:

    Except that Obama was giving a public speech, on camera, at the time.

    I don’t remember, where was Mrs “O” on that day?

    And isn’t it possible that there could have been some high-end Dem donors on board, a sort of Obama twist on the Clinton’s Lincoln Bedroom scandal?

  38. #44
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:23 am, frontierguy said:

    Openness in government is fine if it hurts America’s reputation, but not if it harms Obama’s.

    Yeah, we get that.

    That is what the story may be IMHO. We could find it was the Great Lincoln Bedroom in the sky joyride for high rolling Obama donors.

    Just what I was thinking flyoverman….This may have waste of money stamped all over it, right when the economy is in “shambles”. Who got the joy ride?

  39. #45
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:23 am, chapoutier said:

    And isn’t it possible that there could have been some high-end Dem donors on board, a sort of Obama twist on the Clinton’s Lincoln Bedroom scandal?

    Yes.

    I fully support MM’s FOIA request.

  40. #46
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:24 am, Drews2Cents said:

    Excellent as always Michelle.

    Still waiting on a response to why he’s racking up a million dollar plus legal bill protecting a ten cent piece of paper that shows where he was born…

  41. #48
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:25 am, jangar said:

    Who got the joy ride?

    Somebody look for Oprah…or Zetuni…or the gal in Florida…

  42. #49
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:28 am, jjmurphy said:

    I believe the manifest will show many high level donors that were being rewarded for their donations. I think, maybe, they are not so happy they were on that plane right about now.

    The other amazing thing here the the utter stupidity of flying a jumbo jet on a low-level path over Manhattan. I dumb can you possibly be?

  43. #51
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:34 am, JonB said:

    I wonder at times if this whole thing with withholding documents and pictures and such is not all simply a “because I can” thing with the Obamanation.
    He is drunk on the luxuries provided by taxpayer money that he sees as his own bank account, to do whatever he wants and wherever he wants.
    On top of that he has the media right there to protect him from the embarrassment of making a mistake, and to give him a tongue bath for every stupid little thing he does.
    His ego is massive. His arrogance unbelievable. He thinks he deserves all this. That it’s owed to him, which sounds a lot like other people who share similar characteristics to him.
    Maybe someday we can point and laugh as he is forced to live the life his brother lives right now.
    I doubt that we’ll ever see that day though.

  44. #52
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:34 am, SHoward said:

    Just thought I’d mention this: Most F-16s are single seat, but the Air Force does have a small quantity of 2 seat F16s. They aren’t used much except for things like this. I’m rather certain I have actually seen them, though.

    On Topic: I, too, am perplexed at why the pictures aren’t available. At a cost of over $300k, I am quite sure money for top-notch retouching was included and they should be processed and available by now. Hmmmmm.

  45. #53
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:46 am, FruNobulux said:

    Go Michelle! And be careful starting your car.

  46. #54
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:53 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:34 am, SHoward said:

    On Topic: I, too, am perplexed at why the pictures aren’t available.

    My guess is that they just want this to go away. If the purpose of the mission was for some other reason, the pictures don’t exist. If they then were to release old or photo shopped pictures, they would very likely get busted.

    If the mission was for the frivolous purpose reported, why release the pictures? It just extends the shelf life of the story.

  47. #55
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:53 am, jangar said:

    He is drunk on the luxuries provided by taxpayer money that he sees as his own bank account, to do whatever he wants and wherever he wants…

    …since birth.

  48. #56
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:55 am, FirstSkirt said:

    Thanks, MM, for doing the heavy lifting by going through the FOIA request process – asking for the photos will turn out to be a long, hard,dragged out process, especially if they need time to get their propaganda organized. I am wondering why there wasn’t an apology to not only those frightened New Yorkers, but to all Americans for this ridiculous fly-over. Ask me, “lucy, you got a lot of ’splaining to do!”

  49. #57
    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:56 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:46 am, FruNobulux said:
    Go Michelle! And be careful starting your car.

    Yeesh!
    Just to be safe, drive the same year Monte Carlo that Bobby Deniro had in the movie Casino.

  50. #58
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:03 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:46 am, FruNobulux said:
    Go Michelle! And be careful starting your car.

    Yeesh! Make sure you drive the same year Monte Carlo that Bobby Deniro drove in the movie Casino.

  51. #60
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:11 am, Dave Turson said:

    The planes buzzed lower Manhattan three times. The first pass wouldn’t get many pictures of scared people, but the second and third pass would. Those pics would add to The One’s agony. He only wants the ecstasy part of the leadership thing when in transparency mode.

  52. #61
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:12 am, ahraley said:

    Could it be that photos taken inside the plane show who was actually on the plane? My guess – absolutely.

  53. #62
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:17 am, John Deaux said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:53 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    My guess is that they just want this to go away.

    Just like the transcript and birth certificate requests. If we ignore it long enough…

  54. #63
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:25 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Who got the joy ride?

    Michelle O, scoping out NYC shoe stores.

  55. #64
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:28 am, Flyoverman said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:12 am, ahraley said:
    Could it be that photos taken inside the plane show who was actually on the plane? My guess – absolutely.

    Their egos would require that they have photographs taken of them on The President’s aircraft.

  56. #65
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:30 am, Flyoverman said:

    Michelle,

    May I suggest you also request transcripts or audio tapes of the Air Traffic Control Center that monitored and directed the flight?

    If the ATC refers to the aircraft as “Air Force One” guess who was on board. ;)

  57. #66
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:38 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Who got the joy ride?

    “Give me dat fillum! Give me dat fillum!”
    - Gene Roth (DUNKED IN THE DEEP, 1949)

  58. #68
    On May 6th, 2009 at 11:56 am, Jeff2161 said:

    “Give me dat fillum! Give me dat fillum!”
    - Gene Roth (DUNKED IN THE DEEP, 1949)

    Oh,no…Attack of the Stooges…
    LMAO

  59. #70
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, Freddy said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am, DBNinKY said:

    I don’t remember, where was Mrs “O” on that day?

    So far, she was unaccounted for. This was a half day deal for those on that plane.

    Maybe they feel a need to ‘clasify’ M Obama’s ‘guest’ list?

  60. #71
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, nuss said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am, GladzKravtz said:
    “Last week there was a comment about the flight being similar to the ‘Lincoln bedroom’”

    I have been thinking the same thing. A flyabout on Airforce 1 at taxpayers expense as payback to Obama’s cronies and/or big campaign donors. Trumps the Clintons’ selling of one of our national treasures, the Lincoln Bedroom, to slime balls for favors. Clintons just weren’t thinking big enough. However, it may not be true. They are now trying to pass it off as a training mission for pilots, secret service, etc. They’ve had plenty of time to think this one up as a plausible explanation. I don’t buy it. Something stinks to high heaven on this, and I applaud MM and Fox News for going after it through the Freedom of Info Act.

  61. #72
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I wonder what the in-flight movie was that day?

    ‘The Manchurian Candidate’?

  62. #73
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:30 pm, Durangodarlin said:

    Hmmmmm. I wonder what they are up to?

  63. #74
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:31 pm, tonyr951 said:

    From recovery.gov:

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Recovery.gov is the main vehicle for finding out how taxpayer dollars are being spent to rejuvenate our economy. As we embark on this unprecedented journey of transparency and accountability, there are bound to be lots of questions from both citizens wanting to track where their money is going and government agencies trying to provide that detailed information.

    Can’t see the spending on the Scare Force One stunt :(

  64. #75
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:31 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, spaceycakes said:
    I wonder what the in-flight movie was that day?

    “Airplane”
    First Jive Dude: Shiiiiit, maaaaan. That honky muf’ be messin’ mah old lady… got to be runnin’ cold upside down his head, you know?
    Second Jive Dude: Hey home’, I can dig it. Know ain’t gonna lay no mo’ big rap up on you, man!
    First Jive Dude: I say hey, sky… subba say I wan’ see…
    Second Jive Dude: Uh-huh.
    First Jive Dude: …pray to J I did the same ol’ same ol’!
    Second Jive Dude: Hey… knock a self a pro, Slick! That gray matter backlot perform us DOWN, I take TCB-in’, man!
    First Jive Dude: Hey, you know what they say: see a broad to get dat booty yak ‘em…
    First Jive Dude, Second Jive Dude: …leg ‘er down a smack ‘em yak ‘em!
    First Jive Dude: COL’ got to be! Y’know? Shiiiiit.

  65. #76
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:34 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    ——————————————————————————–
    Randy: Can I get you something?
    Second Jive Dude: ‘S’mofo butter layin’ me to da’ BONE! Jackin’ me up… tight me!
    Randy: I’m sorry, I don’t understand.
    First Jive Dude: Cutty say ‘e can’t HANG!
    Jive Lady: Oh stewardess! I speak jive.
    Randy: Oh, good.
    Jive Lady: He said that he’s in great pain and he wants to know if you can help him.
    Randy: All right. Would you tell him to just relax and I’ll be back as soon as I can with some medicine?
    Jive Lady: Jus’ hang loose, blood. She gonna catch ya up on da’ rebound on da’ med side.
    Second Jive Dude: What it is, big mama? My mama no raise no dummies. I dug her rap!
    Jive Lady: Cut me some slack, Jack! Chump don’ want no help, chump don’t GET da’ help!
    First Jive Dude: Say ‘e can’t hang, say seven up!
    Jive Lady: Jive ass dude don’t got no brains anyhow! Hmmph!

  66. #77
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Rogue‘…oh, and we’re out of coffee…AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!…’

  67. #78
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, right_on said:

    Methinks someone has been spending too much time in the aura of the Clintons!

    Regarding documentation:

    “I don’t know where those are,” Mr. Gibbs said.

    “I don’t know where those are,” Mrs. Clinton said.

    Deja vu all over again?

  68. #79
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:39 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    ——————————————————————————–
    Rumack: I won’t deceive you, Mr. Striker. We’re running out of time.
    Ted Striker: Surely there must be something you can do.
    Rumack: I’m doing everything I can… and stop calling me Shirley.

  69. #80
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:39 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    coffee said:
    We’ll eventually get those overpriced photos, but Gibbs will always be a clueless looking, arrogant White House tool STOOL.

  70. #81
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, spaceycakes said:
    Rogue‘…oh, and we’re out of coffee…AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!…’

    Elaine: Would you gentlemen care to order your dinners?
    First Jive Dude: Bet, babe. Slide a piece o’ da’ porter. Drinks, I run da’ java.
    Second Jive Dude: Lookie here. I can dig grease ‘n chompin’ on some buns and draggin’ through the garden.

  71. #82
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:44 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Jack Kirkpatrick: What’s going on here? We have a right to know the truth!
    Rumack: [to Mr. Hammen and the rest of the passengers] All right, I’m going to level with you all. But what’s most important now is that you remain calm. There is no reason to panic.
    [Rumack's nose grows an inch long]
    Rumack: Now, it’s true that one of the crew members is ill… slightly ill.
    [Rumack's nose continues to grow longer and longer; al la Pinocchio]
    Rumack: But the other two pilots… they’re just fine. They’re at the controls flying the plane… free to peruse a life of religious fulfillment

  72. #83
    On May 6th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    “I don’t know where those are,” Mr. Gibbs said.

    These are not the photos I knew …

  73. #86
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:17 pm, T-Bone said:

    Yes.

    I fully support MM’s FOIA request.

    But it doesn’t matter what he or his people did, I would vote for him again and again and again. And besides, Booosh…

  74. #87
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:21 pm, SHoward said:

    Hey T-Bone, I think your “sarc-lock” key is stuck on.

  75. #88
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, BOB said:

    On May 6th, 2009 at 10:04 am, Flyoverman said:
    I do not really care to see the photos of the aircraft over New York.

    However, I am VERY VERY VERY interested in any photographs taken INSIDE the aircraft. I would also LOVE to see the passenger manifest of who was on board that aircraft.

    That is what the story may be IMHO. We could find it was the Great Lincoln Bedroom in the sky joyride for high rolling Obama donors.

    I agree, the list of those on the Air Farce One flight will be kept with Obambi’s birth certificate and college papers and other stuff that must be kept secret…..however, this stuff just might leak out from some of the fat cat doners and friends of Obama.

  76. #90
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, Southpaw said:

    “Vanity is the natural weakness of an ambitious man, which exposes him to the secret scorn and derision of those he converses with, and ruins the character he is so industrious to advance by it.”
    Joseph Addison

    “The truest characters of ignorance are vanity, and pride and arrogance.”
    Samuel Butler

  77. #91
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, Khyris said:

    You forgot to mention the DOE sitting on that report on the effectiveness of charter schools until after the vote to dismantle them in DC

  78. #92
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, right_on said:

    Vanity is the natural weakness of an ambitious man,

    In Obama’s case it’s not vanity…it’s narcissism!

  79. #93
    On May 6th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, chapoutier said:

    You forgot to mention the DOE sitting on that report on the effectiveness of charter schools until after the vote to dismantle them in DC

    Oh. You mean the ones released 2 1/2 month earlier than any of the previous reports had been released?

  80. #95
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, groundhunter said:

    F16s can take recon photos
    automatically, The pilot just starts the camera and off they go. I would immagine they have cameras that can take picuctures down their gun sights.

  81. #96
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:15 pm, Laree said:

    reconnaissance?

  82. #97
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:17 pm, spaceycakes said:

    F16s can take recon photos
    automatically, The pilot just starts the camera and off they go

    See? I told you I could be wrong, but now I ask, what quality are these photos? Are they the ‘glossy-good-enough-for-coverofNewsweek’ kind?

  83. #98
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, fuseman said:

    the real reason for trying to keep this quiet is because everyone on the flight was drunk and having gay sex- including the flight crew.

  84. #99
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, T-Bone said:

    Why wouldn’t they send up another plane with “good” cameras and angles etc? There must be many planes that can keep up with Air Force Zero and provide camara shoot angles etc.

    Why only F-16’s. I suppose that the F16’s always follow or are around Air Force Zero but why have them do double duty. Of course they have cameras but are they the right cameras for photo ops.

    Something is not right. Doesn’t sound very transparent. Of course, that is a given in my book. Obama is all about politics. By any means neccesary. What he says and what he does are not always the same but both are always done for political purposes.

  85. #100
    On May 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    So far, she was unaccounted for. This was a half day deal for those on that plane.

    Maybe they feel a need to ‘clasify’ M Obama’s ‘guest’ list?

    The wife, the kids, the dog…

    Somewhere an Air Force flight crew goes out for drinks and shoots the breeze…

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Green Room

» So… What Next?
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook