What Nan knew

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 7, 2009 07:48 PM

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew from September 2, 2002 that enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, were being used on jihadi detainees.

She knew. From Day One.

That’s what the CIA memo, published at Human Events, shows.

ABC News follows. Pelosi’s spokesperson says his boss has a “recollection” that is “different.”

Nancy Pelosi: Blink, blink.

Allahpundit surveys all the evidence contradicting Pelosi and comes to the only conclusion: Liar.

***

Video flashback:

Posted in: Gitmo, Nancy Pelosi, Torture

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Nancy Pelosi exposed! - Nancy Pelosi knew from September 2, 2002 that enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding! | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  2. Nancy Pelosi, War Criminal? | NEOAVATARA
  3. DNI Report: Pelosi Knew Waterboarding Was Being Used | The American Pundit
  4. Liars Never Prosper: CIA Memo Proves Nancy Pelosi Deliberately Lied about Waterboarding Knowledge « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  5. Stop The ACLU
  6. OOPS: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Should Have Joined “Shotgun” Cheney In Shredding Damning Torture “Program” Evidence | THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™
  7. Mrs. Pelosi briefed on enhanced interrogation | BitsBlog
  8. Nancy Pelosi, Liar Of The House :Conservative Nation
  9. CIA- Nancy Pelosi Is Lying… We Briefed Her About Use of Torture in 2002…
  10. The Irascible Chef » Pants on Fire Alert!
  11. CitzCom
  12. Judicial Watch And A Nancy Polsi Private Jet | Political Crave
  13. silent E speaks » Blog Archive » Keep Diggin’ That Hole Deeper Nancy…..
  14. Jules Crittenden » Liar, Liar
  15. Jesus is Lord, A Worshipping Christian’s Blog » Blog Archive » “What Nan Knew” By Michelle Malkin
  16. RIGHT of left » Blog Archive » Pelosi Knew All About It
  17. The Wide Awake Cafe » Pelosi is a Total Shill
  18. Nightly Ramble: The “No Little Fish” Edition | BitsBlog
  19. The Enlightened Despot » Blog Archive » Is Pelosi Busted?
  20. Hard Starboard
  21. Pelosi a hypocrite and a liar on waterboarding - wellsy’s Diary - RedState
  22. Week-end Wrap-up: What you might have missed last week. | The Common Sense Republic
  23. It’s Karma: Nancy “Liar of the House” Pelosi’s Exploding Scandal about Her Numerous Waterboarding Lies « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  24. Rush Limbaugh’s Transcripts on Nancy Pelosi & Waterboarding: ‘If a Liberal Tells a Whopper Lie But Nobody Reports It, Is It Still a Lie?’ « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  25. Nancy In A Pickle « Around The Sphere
  26. INTERROGATION: Nancy Pelosi knew about waterboarding « FactReal
  27. What I would like to see… | THE Right Side of Wisconsin Blog Network
  28. Michelle Malkin » Pelosi, the CIA, and the Dems’ dangerous blame game
  29. Irresistible Train Wreck Metaphor… Nancy Pelosi: Pitiful, Flustered, Lying Fool « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  30. CIA Brainwashed Nancy Pelosi–Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EIT) Get Results–Exhibit A Videos « Pronk Palisades
  31. Newt Gingrich Lets Pelosi Have It with Both Barrels for Her Dangerous Lies & Deception: “She Is Nitpicking in a Fundamentally Dishonest Way” (Video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  32. Who do you believe the CIA or Pelosi? NANCY NEEDS TO GO « Dianej’s Weblog

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #696921
    On May 7th, 2009 at 7:55 pm, tre said:

    THROW SAN FRAN NAN IN PRISON!!

    RIGHT BESIDE BOOOOOOSH, DARTH CHENEY, AN’ ALL THE REST OF THEM THERE EEEEEEVIL NEO CONS WHO DID THIS TO THOSE POOR LITTLE TERRORISTS!!!

  2. #696925
    On May 7th, 2009 at 7:57 pm, tarpon said:

    Well shut my mouth with botox.

    The intelligence committee is set up this way, 4 members House and Senate, half from each party, get these briefings. This prevents the Army from doing something that Congress is not aware of.

    Not only did she know, she knew for years.

  3. #696926
    On May 7th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Nan: ” I refuse to reference my memories to any facts” I stashed a memo to myself stating either, I supported or, I was appalled by it. ”
    Of course, I was so appalled, I didn’t tell anyone because I was in shock and, suffering from PTSD.
    “What is this horse head doing in my bed ? “

  4. #696927
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:00 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    The intelligence committee is set up this way

    No intelligent people allowed on it. Only those, who will leak damaging information.

  5. #696931
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, Marie said:

    The intelligence committee is set up this way…….

    should not the committee be staffed with intelligent people?

  6. #696932
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, whiteasianrose said:

    wow

    i would be surprised but ya know, the way dems speak out both sides of their mouths as well as other parts of their anatomy, it doesn’t surprise me one bit. surely this too will be bush’s fault as his letting her know obviously caused a mental block that heretofore has been unexposed.

    poor nancy

  7. #696933
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:08 pm, Marie said:

    Jeff2161 we posted at the same time

  8. #696939
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:11 pm, txvet2 said:

    Is there supposed to be something new in this? We’ve known forever that she was in the loop on this, just as with the invasion of Iraq and everything else the Bush Administration did.

  9. #696940
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:11 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Yes, Marie : But, it’s ok…Once we get re-educated; we won’t remember any of this.

  10. #696942
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:13 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:08 pm, Marie said:

    Almost, a simultaneous…Obama

    LOL
    :)

  11. #696944
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Nans against it because she’s for it…or something…
    Reminds me of a Frank Zappa song…
    She’s gotta be out of it before she gets into it…
    Besaides, I thought nude water-torture would be a big plus in San Fran…
    Maybe there was not enough leather involved ?

  12. #696948
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    What’s even more scarier than that picture of hers on this website is the fact that she’s 3rd in line.

    Could you all imagine that????

  13. #696952
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Could you all imagine that????

    With Joe, #2… No one, will shoot at Obama.

  14. #696953
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:21 pm, prendad said:

    Nancy Pelosi must be in Al Franken-stines book “Lies (And the Lying Liars Who Tell Them)”. I wonder how I can sleep at night with this wild-eyed psychopath witch sucking the life-force out of America with the help of her arch-demons Harry and Barney. Prayers help.

  15. #696954
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:22 pm, fred5676 said:

    She is either lying or she slept through an intelligence briefing during a very critical time in our nation’s history.

    Only in San Francisco could such a dolt be reelected.

    But don’t worry, she’s only SECOND in line for the Presidency!

  16. #696957
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, et said:

    Lets try that World Court thing. What’s ya think Nan?

  17. #696959
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, John Deaux said:

    Failed memory didn’t work for Scooter Libby. Indict her now!

  18. #696960
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, Marie said:

    BlameAmericaLast #12
    That’s the only thing keeping a lot of people from knocking Obama
    off!!! LOL!!

  19. #696962
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:26 pm, right4life said:

    God she’s ugly…

    the thread on hotair on this subject is funny as hell..

  20. #696967
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:31 pm, undresiege said:

    Obama should have pushed for those incompetent hacks Reid and Pelosi to be replaced after his election. That’s change I can believe in.

  21. #696968
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:32 pm, right4life said:

    she’s a democrat she’s SUPPOSED TO LIE….

    move on, nothing to see here…

  22. #696969
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:32 pm, Marie said:

    Maybe our system is flawed… that the likes of Nancy Pelosi can be third in line for President………

  23. #696973
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:34 pm, DagneyT said:

    She can blink?

  24. #696975
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:34 pm, Flyoverman said:

    SO…… the question is what can be done about it?

    Silence is implied consent. She’s been dancing a long time. If she wants to dance, it’s time for her to pay the fiddler.

  25. #696977
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    She’s been dancing a long time. If she wants to dance, it’s time for her to pay the fiddler.

    Or, dance on air…Traitorous ( female dog).

  26. #696979
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:40 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Following her logic, hearing something, not speaking up but, writing up a memo pretending opposition…Standard CYA behaviour; BUT, claiming she did not know…
    Bravo Sierra

  27. #696984
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:45 pm, hitcharide said:

    And of course the old standby…how do you tell if a democrat is lying? Their lips are moving! All this crap over waterboarding, when we all know that if obummer was in favor of it, you’d hear crickets at huffpo and dkos. And none of that matters a whit to me because I’d personally waterboard any person standing between me and the safety of my country. I’ll wait in vain for ANY democrat of “stature” to denounce ms. pelosi, and I’ll laugh at the consistent hypocrisy by the left who always seem to care more for the rights of terrorists than the lives of innocents.

  28. #696985
    On May 7th, 2009 at 8:46 pm, zorro said:

    San Fran Nan does what all politicians do. Lie. She just does it more often.

  29. #697006
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, Lucifer Jones said:

    Have you ever seen her in the Body Language segment of the Bill O’ Reilly show? Her hand gesticulations are so out-of-synch from what she says and how she says it. I’d say that indicates nervousness and concealment (lying).

  30. #697016
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:26 pm, maisy said:

    Who needs waterboarding?
    Just show them that photo of Nan….that would scare the bejesus out of anyone!!!
    It’s enough to scare me away from Botox forever!!!

  31. #697021
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:29 pm, Hangfire said:

    Cognito, ergo menteri

    N. Pelosi

  32. #697029
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Cognito, ergo menteri

    Understand, she’s crazy ?
    I don’t get out much…
    ;)

  33. #697030
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, sbw999 said:

    A liberal that lies through their teeth????? Color me shocked!

  34. #697033
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:37 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Besaides, I thought nude water-torture would be a big plus in San Fran…
    Maybe there was not enough leather involved ?

    .

  35. #697039
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:43 pm, BOB said:

    She can plead “old” as a reason for not remembering.

  36. #697042
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:44 pm, Hangfire said:

    Kevin Costner’s Waterworld was torture enough for me.

  37. #697045
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:54 pm, purplepeep said:

    I think it would be wise not to get sucked into advancing the DKos-lunatic left fringe’s “Pelosi got caught up in the GOP-Bush Torture Crimes” line of (so-called) reasoning.

  38. #697048
    On May 7th, 2009 at 9:58 pm, simcoe said:

    Can anyone say with a straight face that they are surprised?

    I’ll bet a couple minuets of waterboarding will resolve her recollection issues.

  39. #697052
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:05 pm, bear1909 said:

    Botox on the brain. Mix that with her vino consumption…… bad ju ju Granny. ROFLMAO

    This woman is a walking parody of herself.

    Fire her.

    Lying swindler.

  40. #697054
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:06 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I’ll bet a couple minuets of waterboarding will resolve her recollection issues.

    If nothing else, there is the entertainment factor.

  41. #697056
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:08 pm, right_on said:

    Intelligence Committees staffed by Democrat members? I guess it depends on their definition of “intelligence.”

    The leaking of secrets only seems to happen under Republican presidents. Actionable intel occurs under both administrations, but it seems the Republican side are the only ones to take effective action.

    Democrat presidents start wars, and Republican presidents end them. There is an emerging pattern here.

  42. #697057
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:09 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    I’ll bet a couple minuets

    Ahh… But which minuettes ? A conundrum, to be sure.
    Ahhh…Bach !

    Anderson: And of course I never travel anywhere without good old Johann Sebastian.
    Rader, after a confused pause: Ah! Bach!
    Anderson: What does that mean, ‘Ah, Bach’?
    Radar: Uh, just that. Ah, Bach!
    Hawkeye: I think once you’ve said that you’ve said it all.
    Love Story

  43. #697058
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:11 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Off with her head !!!

  44. #697059
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:12 pm, CrazyFool said:

    Nancy is a liar?

    Next thing your be telling me water is wet and it gets darker outside at night…..

  45. #697065
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:16 pm, purplepeep said:

    Jeff2161 said:
    Rader, after a confused pause: Ah! Bach!

    Just don’t forget to incorporate the wink and proper hand signal as being indicitive of “fellow classical music insider” approval. Never fails to impress the ladies.

  46. #697071
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, Ron said:

    Of COURSE she knew, we’ve known that all along. Of COURSE she lied about it, she’s an anti-war Democrat, a self-serving, self-promoting, arrogant leftist. What ELSE should we expect? She’ll still deny it and deny it and deny it. If they had pictures of her pouring water onto a terrorist, she’d still deny, deny, deny. She’s a liar. It’s what she does for a living. It’s what she is. This is non-news.

  47. #697074
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Never fails to impress the ladies.

    Unfortunately, some ladies failed to get the memo…
    :)

  48. #697078
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:29 pm, swede said:

    CrazyFool said: Nancy is a liar?

    Don’t be silly. It was a truth challenged contingency statement. Only Bush lies.

  49. #697077
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:29 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    If she only had a brain….

  50. #697083
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:45 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Zo has the right idea. Someone throw a bucket of water on this witch.

  51. #697085
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:53 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Pelosi imagines Obama will swoop in and save her from her own lies. Because she is a good liberal.

    She has been used and her time is about up.

  52. #697088
    On May 7th, 2009 at 10:57 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    She is just that though a used liberal. She can be replaced at anytime by a younger cheaper version of herself.

    There are young eager liberals in her district just waiting to take her seat.

    In order to curry favor with Obama for cover, she will have to give a lot of power over to his whims.

    Will she do it? Of course, and he might help her, for as long as her obedience fancies Obama.

  53. #697089
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:01 pm, regularguy said:

    I’m not at all convinced she’s lying. She’s so dense it’s very possible she was informed very well early on about all of this and simply never comprehended a word of it.

  54. #697094
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:12 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Pelosi agrees wholeheartedly with Obama’s decree that waterboarding is torture. Infact, waterboarding is so horrendous I’m sure she hasn’t been able to get the image of it out of her head ever since that briefing back in 2002. Every detail of that briefing must have been seared into her mind to the point of giving her nightmares and haunting her every waking moment…

    Oh wait. That’s right, she didn’t remember the briefing when first asked about it. I guess that tells us all we need to know about her concern for the use of torture on those poor, helpless terrorists back in 2002.

    The only reason Pres. Obama and the rest of these weasels are making such a big deal about “torture” now is to discredit the Bush administration. It’s not about values. The only “value” these people hold as absolute is their devine right to rule. Anyone who dares get in their way must be shamed and destroyed by any means possible.

    There’s a new Pharaoh in Egypt. All monuments to the old pharaoh must be torn down and his name blotted out of the history books. That’s why Gitmo has to be closed and rebuilt at great expense somewhere else – because it’s a reminder of Bush and how he kept us safe.

    Obama said he is going to “remake America.” First, he has to tear down everything that reminds us of the “old America”, and then he can remake America – in his own image.

  55. #697096
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:15 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    We should cut Nan some slack. She’s obviously dyslexic when it somes to discussing whether she knows something or not. If she claims she knows something, it means she doesn’t. If she states that she didn’t know something, it means she did.

    Where eles could she be employed except in the US Congress???

  56. #697098
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:19 pm, SHoward said:

    Where eles could she be employed except in the US Congress???

    CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, PMSNBC, NYT, LATimes,… do I really need to keep going?

    Oh, yeah, lobbyist, union rep,…..

  57. #697100
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:23 pm, MrOlympia said:

    Yeah yeah the botox leached into her brain and destroyed only the brain cells with the memory of the “torture” briefings.

    To me just seeing a photo of her is torture let alone listening to anything she has to say.

    Let’s put Nan on Alcatraz and then ship the Gitmo detainees there to keep her company. Then she might get a real understanding of what torture is?

  58. #697101
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:25 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:19 pm, SHoward said:

    Agree with you regarding the lies, but doesn’t complete incompetence catch up with you sooner or later in the real world???

  59. #697110
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:36 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On May 7th, 2009 at 7:55 pm, tre said:

    THROW SAN FRAN NAN IN PRISON!!

    I dont know about that. I havent researched it thoroughly but I dont think she was under oath when she said it. Credibility is one thing, but legal standing is another. Im sure shes played the game long enough to know where the line is drawn.

    I can say what I want to here (within the context of the rules) and on the street, but until a court makes me raise my hand, one cant really believe we are who we are.

    I may say “I hate strawberries”. And if some police officer or analyst wastes their time logging into my FBI file that I am a strawberry hater, then until I am read my rights and I pronounce strawberries are the root of all evil, perhaps I shall sit here eating a banana split with 3 types of strawberry ice cream and only strawberry topping – pureed not blended. (but with 2 cherries and whip cream)

    BTW, have you heard that ACORN is recruiting Girl Scouts to supplement the census canvassers? (murmur) Its only natural since they are both evil little agents of Satan…

  60. #697111
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:38 pm, vickisoup said:

    The picture over at drudgereport is priceless, with the caption, “Drip. Drip. Drip.” She looks like a really angry old man in the photo. Priceless, I tell ya!
    :P

  61. #697112
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:43 pm, SHoward said:

    Agree with you regarding the lies, but doesn’t complete incompetence catch up with you sooner or later in the real world???

    I don’t know. How long was Dan Rather an anchor?

  62. #697113
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:43 pm, vickisoup said:

    Agree with you regarding the lies, but doesn’t complete incompetence catch up with you sooner or later in the real world???

    Let’s not forget Ann Coulter’s finest quote, IMHO:
    “But as long as the nation is obsessed with historic milestones, is no one going to remark on what a great country it is where a mentally retarded woman can become speaker of the house?”

    :lol:
    (no offense to “developmentally disabled” folks, as we say here out west)

  63. #697114
    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:46 pm, American Elephant said:

    Nancy, and the other Democrats who knew must be investigated by the Justice Department to see if criminal prosecution is appropriate!

    Otherwise Obama proves he was politicizing national security.

  64. #697120
    On May 8th, 2009 at 12:07 am, Terry_Jim said:

    The yawn from the lap dog media is deafening.

  65. #697123
    On May 8th, 2009 at 12:10 am, Stillwaiting said:

    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:43 pm, SHoward said:

    Tooooo long.

  66. #697125
    On May 8th, 2009 at 12:14 am, Stillwaiting said:

    On May 7th, 2009 at 11:43 pm, SHoward said:

    It’s funny you mentioned Rather. I was thinking about him as an example that sooner or later even MSN morons go too far and get rejected. But the standards are low and the tolerance for stupidity is apparently pretty high.

    You’re right, Nan has other options.

  67. #697141
    On May 8th, 2009 at 2:03 am, emjem24 said:

    Folks like San Fran Nan really think they’re precious. They’re already well-connected, they marry well, and then based on the first two criteria, can be elected to Congress on the batty Grandma ticket. Too bad that most of the botox zapped the precious few brain cells still in that nob of hers. It’s gonna be hard to tell whether she “knowingly” or “unknowingly” lied about being briefed.

    Mediocrity is the price that the US will continue to pay for having hacks like this witch in office. Please, for the sake of any dignity that still resides in San Francisco, could the voters please permanently retire this princess back to her vineyard? She can give her illegal laborers tips on being great revolutionaries while cultivating her vines.

    Please, pretty please…. ;-)

  68. #697142
    On May 8th, 2009 at 2:03 am, Major O said:

    What?? No one from the Left here to defend, deny, or deflect?? Or at least insert a blatant non sequitur when all else fails??

    sanford
    Hold on, ‘lisbeth!
    /sanford

  69. #697148
    On May 8th, 2009 at 2:48 am, derekinseoul said:

    its funny when republicans lie the left is all over it demanding answers and impeachments but a left wing nut case fibs not a peep out of em!!

  70. #697149
    On May 8th, 2009 at 2:55 am, Bogtrotter said:

    LOL! How she lasted for 10 minutes and 57 seconds standing there dancing around the issue and twisting the facts is stunning. And of course the press was there NOT pressing very hard at all. A shining example of Washington, self-serving, scumbaggery.

  71. #697157
    On May 8th, 2009 at 3:15 am, conservative in europe said:

    What can be done about it??

    Well – no crimes have actually been committed by the United States so.. Nothing. Legally.

    I’m going out on a limb here and again showing the RNC where they can gain a little political leverage (as if they actually wanted to): The RNC must seize this opportunity to go on the offensive against Nancy and her gang of reprobate Commies. The fact that this story made ABC news is encouraging. There should be pundits on all Channels – especially the MSM in order to shove it back down their throats.

    I read the comments on the Washington Times and someone asked why Nancy didn’t realize that the CIA might push ack on this. That’s a great question. A good Civil Servant learns to protect themselves by keeping records of when briefings took place and who was present (contrary to what you may think – CIA employees are Civil Servants just as though they worked for any other Executive Branch department). It’s just common sense. Especially if sensitive material is being discussed. There is an old saw in the government, “Never admit, always deny, make counter-allegations”. This axiom is easy to utilize when you have “contemperaneous notes” (excuse the spelling please). Notes taken at the time of a meeting are not considered hearsay and admissible in administrative and criminal courts. Once you’ve been a manager in the Government, you learn pretty quickly to keep the notes..

    How Nancy was so stupid as to think there wouldn’t be a record of her attendance and approval at this briefing is beyond comprehension. So she threatens to prosecute the people who briefed her and then acts surprised when the notes come out?

    I know I’m being long winded but Nan and her gang have fallen in to the same trap Newt did back in ‘95. They won a majority (slim) and start to believe their own BS. Nancy honestly thinks that everyone in America wants to prosecute Booooosh. So do most Dems. That is what they are told on TV every day. That whole 48% of America voting against Blue Lips & Co. (’cause we sure didn’t vote for McAmnesty) doesn’t register with them.

    RNC – you’ve been handed a cannon with this one. Load it with grape shot and fire as she bears..

  72. #697158
    On May 8th, 2009 at 3:28 am, conservative in europe said:

    Before I leave for the day – Lying and criminality 101:

    In order for lying to be a crime, the lie must be material to a crime.

    “Material” means your lie has to have an role in furthering the crime or cause a crime to be committed. Or, it could be material if it is used specifically to divert an investigator from finding the truth (which is obstruction of justice).

    This is very simplistic and a dozen lawyers will jump on my statement to add to or correct it. But, very basically, this is what makes a “lie” usually referred to as “misrepresentation” in the law, a crime.

    The Key to my point is that the lie itself must be about or in furtherance of, a crime. Lying about a meeting where no crime was committed or conspired to is a lie, but not a crime.

    As much as I would like to see Nan behind bars, I would rather see her lose an election so solidly even her slimy DemoCommie lawyers can’t contest it.

  73. #697160
    On May 8th, 2009 at 3:48 am, feebiebabe said:

    Liar Liar – adult panties on fire!

    I hope she gets outed in 2010, if not, sent packing before.

    Ugh. She makes my skin crawl.

  74. #697163
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:52 am, 4USA said:

    I’m shocked how everyone is disparaging Nancy Pelosi!!

    Don’t you right-wing terrorists know that without her hard work pushing the stimulus bill, there would be 500 million newly unemployed Americans every month?

    http://popmodal.com/video/1849/Nancy-Pelosi-at-her-finest

  75. #697182
    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:25 am, ErinF said:

    This is just yet another inconvenient dem detail to be swifty swept under the rug.

  76. #697183
    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:26 am, ErinF said:

    I hope she gets outed in 2010, if not, sent packing before.

    We won’t be able to oust her and her ilk in 2010. Amnesty will pass before then and we will have a permanent leftward tilt.

  77. #697205
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:38 am, Cosmo said:

    I couldn’t see from the wide angle shot…were Nancy’s pants on fire here?

    LIAR. MOST. ETHICAL. CONGRESS. EVER.

    LIAR.

  78. #697216
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:14 am, Lindsay said:

    San Fran Nan, Mouthpiece of Corruption.

    Her excuse? New Botox injections on that day of the CIA briefing, which caused hearing loss. She did not hear about the waterboarding nor know what the acronyms stood for. She also did not know where she was at the time, only that her Armani suit fit to perfection.

  79. #697218
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:18 am, cicerokid said:

    We needed a CIA memo to determine that this witch was lying? like a rug on the floor, baby.

    Papa louie in post 54 is spot on:

    “There’s a new Pharaoh in Egypt. All monuments to the old pharaoh must be torn down and his name blotted out of the history books. That’s why Gitmo has to be closed and rebuilt at great expense somewhere else – because it’s a reminder of Bush and how he kept us safe.”

    Why Filipino wife of 10 years asked me upon hearing the “change” mantra: “What was wrong with the old America?”

  80. #697223
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:34 am, Lindsay said:

    Nancy was confused that day. Give her a break.

    It was an early briefing, she had not had her Tall Soy Non-Fat Frappuccino with a shot of espresso to counter-act her Botox haze of the day. She was basically in a fugue-type state and appeared to be a manikin to others present.

    She really, really thought the CIA dudes were talking about engaging the Gitmo guys in water recreation off the coast of Cuba. She felt Sen. John Kerry had approved this measure since he water boards himself. So she thought, what’s the big deal? Then she wondered if her pearl necklace matched her earrings.

  81. #697224
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:34 am, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Like I always say. Nancy Pelosi is a two faced liar;….. the second one’s in a jar on a shelf in her plastic surgeon’s office!

  82. #697228
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:44 am, jbh45 said:

    To Nan’s constituents: C’mon, vote her OUT!

  83. #697232
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:49 am, babiesgrandma said:

    I never thought I would want Cindy Sheehan to win anything, but I sure was hoping she could get the Congressional seat from San Fran Nan back in 2008.

    Ah, well, we can all dream….

  84. #697239
    On May 8th, 2009 at 9:02 am, ajmontana said:

    Teddy Kennedy said:
    Errah, Like I always say. Nancy Pelosi is a two faced liar;….. the second one’s in a jar on a shelf in her plastic surgeon’s office!

    Labled, Abby Normal

  85. #697244
    On May 8th, 2009 at 9:21 am, almiller said:

    Well the story is going to die now. No more hounding Bush lawyers yada yada yada… nothing to see here. The renditions will continue…

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Here we go: World meddling in 9/11 show trials begins

November 23, 2009 11:48 AM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Gitmo detainees will use trials as “platform” to bash America

November 22, 2009 10:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

“Their assessment is negative.”

Corruptocrat AG Eric Holder’s conflicted DOJ

November 20, 2009 05:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The real Gitmo

November 17, 2009 10:36 AM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 1 Trackback

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Ho-hum: Pelosicare hikes costs $289 billion

November 14, 2009 10:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Hey, Nancy: Can you hear America now?

November 5, 2009 03:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Gitmo, Nancy Pelosi, Torture



Mudville Gazette

» War costs money (2)

Green Room

» Going Un-Framed?

Mudville Gazette

» Surrender, he whispered

Pundit & Pundette

» The rebirth of Rom Houben
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook