Battered Hedge Fund Managers’ Syndrome

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 8, 2009 09:32 AM

My column today looks at the abusive relationship between Barack Obama and the hedge fund industry. He keeps taking their money. They keep getting publicly tongue-lashed. Looks like the cycle has ended. Last week, non-TARP lenders objected to the UAW-pandering Chrysler deal. This week, AQR Capital Management LLC hedge fund manager Cliff Asness — at considerable risk to himself and his business — issued a striking manifesto responding to the president’s self-serving demagoguery and flagrant disregard for the rule of law. You can find Cliff’s essay and his other invauable work at Stumbling on Truth.

Like the “Cory the Driller” open letter that resonated last year with small businessmen, Asness’s cri de coeur has touched a nerve. Let’s hope his peers on Wall Street listen and learn.

***

Battered Hedge Fund Managers’ Syndrome
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

Greed is good – until it gets in the way of a union-friendly restructuring deal. President Obama, generous recipient of Wall Street largesse, angrily derided a group of hedge fund managers this week as “speculators.” The miffed president suggested that uncooperative firms were selfish for holding out on the government’s Chrysler bankruptcy plans and refusing to make “sacrifices” to benefit the United Auto Workers.

The “sacrifices” involved Chrysler debt holders agreeing to sell the debt to the government at prices determined by union-beholden bureaucrats instead of bankruptcy courts. The hedge firms balked. Obama sneered that the dissenters were looking for “unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout.” But the holdouts never took banking bailout funds from Washington. And the targeted financial executives were simply doing what good money managers are supposed to do: put their clients’ fiduciary interests first.

Obama’s corporate-bashing rhetoric should, of course, come as no shock. During the campaign and continuing through his first 100 days, he has routinely attacked the “ethic of greed.” When Sen. John McCain publicized Obama’s wealth redistribution comments to Joe the Plumber, Obama snarked that McCain was “fighting for Joe The Hedge Fund Manager” and was “in cahoots with Joe the CEO.” First Lady Michelle Obama also singled out hedge fund managers for scorn, urging young people to turn away from unrewarding work on Wall Street for more fulfilling jobs in the “helping industry.”

But behind the public lashings, the Obamas were all too happy to pass the plate around the pews of the Church of “Greed.” According to the Center for Responsive Politics, hedge funds and private equity firms donated $2,992,456 to the Obama campaign in the 2008 cycle. Obama, vocal critic of the campaign finance practice known as “bundling,” accepted more than $200,000 in bundled contributions from billionaire hedge-fund manager James Torrey, more than $100,000 in bundled contributions from billionaire hedge-fund manager Paul Tudor Jones and more than $50,000 in bundled contributions from billionaire hedge-fund manager Kenneth C. Griffin, chief executive officer of Citadel Investment Group in Chicago.

No less than 100 Obama bundlers are investment CEOs and brokers: nearly two dozen work for financial giants such as Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs or Citigroup. By comparison, Evil Republican Rich Guy John McCain received $1,699,525 from the industry.

Obama lambastes the “system and the culture” of the un-helping industry. But he is so much a part of – not apart from – the very climate he condemns. “Speculators” fill many of the top positions in the Obama White House. Hedge fund manager Larry Summers heads the National Economic Council. White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel made millions as an investment banker at Wasserstein Perella. Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, made a comfy living in the hedge fund business until he got entangled into an ongoing mess with the shady Paradigm Capital Management involving fraud and giant Ponzi schemes.

Yes, there are rotten hedge fund managers who have squandered billions of dollars without accountability – not unlike the government bailout and stimulus fund managers in Washington who continue to throw good money after bad. President Obama demagogues the unpopular industry because it fits the popular narrative – Wall Street bad, Washington good. Like battered wives, most hedge fund managers who supported Obama have tolerated the abuse futilely hoping it will stop.

Until this week, that is. In an extraordinarily candid open letter to Obama, hedge fund manager Cliff Asness defended his industry from the president’s “backwards and libelous” charges. “Managers have a fiduciary obligation to look after their clients’ money as best they can, not to support the President, nor to oppose him, nor otherwise advance their political views,” Asness wrote. He has oversight of some $20 billion at AQR Capital Management, LLC , which is not involved in the Chrysler case.

Asness minced no words: “The President’s attempted diktat takes money from bondholders and gives it to a labor union that delivers money and votes for him…Shaking down lenders for the benefit of political donors is recycled corruption and abuse of power.”

Business as usual in the Era of Hope and Change. Perhaps demonized entrepreneurs will finally learn that when the dog you feed bites your hand, you don’t roll up your sleeve and give him your arm. You get a new dog.

Malkin is the author of the forthcoming “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies (Regnery 2009).

Posted in: Barack Obama, Chrysler

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Bloodthirsty Liberal » Joe the Shakedown Artist
  2. Buyers Remorse: America, what Have You Done? — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami
  3. Michelle Malkin » Government Sachs: Impudent NY Fed chairman resigns
  4. Finding Ponies in Piles of Poop
  5. Obama’s attack on hedge-fund managers | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  6. “Gangster government gave Chrysler to the UAW” | OpenMarket.org
  7. The Sham of Socialism: Save America While There’s Still Time « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  8. CitzCom
  9. Obama: Chicagoland Strong Arm Politics At Play | NEOAVATARA
  10. Founding Bloggers
  11. The Lioness
  12. Ask Dr. Davermann - Volume 7 - 05/08/09
  13. Somewhere, H. L. Mencken is laughing [Darleen Click]
  14. Jules Crittenden » Big Mother
  15. Wintery Knight Blog
  16. Cnation’s Picks For 5/10/2009 :Conservative Nation
  17. Conservatism Today
  18. Everybody Open Your Hymnals To Section 363 « Around The Sphere
  19. BizzyBlog » Obama Shocks the Elites
  20. The man who talked back revisited | No Bull. news service.

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #697637
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:19 pm, flenser said:

    Unfortunately, they are not the ones getting screwed. The individual’s who trusted these people with their money are the one’s who are suffering the loss. I believe this includes little old ladies’ retirement accounts as well as anyone trying to invest what little extra they have in order to be able to eat in their senior years.

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong. (I’m not very fluent in the financial sector).

    You’re wrong. Little old ladies don’t invest in hedge funds. Not unless they are billionaire little old ladies. Only the very wealthiest people are allowed to invest in hedge funds.

  2. #697641
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, flenser said:

    Here’s a link for you, from Ace of Spades.

    An influential Democrat who was also one of the world’s top-ten, highest-paid hedge fund managers last year thinks he knows which book is at the top of the White House reading list this spring: Animal Spirits, the powerful new blast of behavioural economics from Nobel prize-winner George Akerlof and Yale economist Robert Shiller.

    An “influential Democrat” who also happens to be one of the ten highest paid hedge fund managers in the world.

    It pays to buy political influence.

  3. #697666
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, jjmurphy said:

    Put me down as not liking Warren Buffett either. Besides his being an Obama supporter, which is bad enough, he keeps harping on this death tax as a great thing. Look, my assets don’t come close to any taxable limit for inheritance taxes, but, dang it, that money is mine. I earned it, and I want it to go to my kids. If Buffett is so upset he is not going to be taxed enough when he dies, then he can pull out his checkbook at any time and write the Treasury a nice, big, fat check.

  4. #697676
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Like him or not, he is perennially the biggest individual taxpayer in the US, an honor he boasts about and can change if he wanted to. That is a statement of fact.

    How much income did “W” declare every year? Anyone remember John Kerry’s disclosures in 2004? Negative net worth? Really?

    Before rushing to an opinion, make sure you understand the difference between wealthy versus someone who just happens to fall into the highest middle-class bracket of earned income. The wealthy can get their political buddies to insert tax code that only applies to them, code that only known to the citizen in question, his tax attorney and his pal in Congress.

  5. #697682
    On May 8th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, d1carter said:

    Mr. Asness can kiss his business goodbye. He will be lucky if he comes out of this in one piece. When does the bus tour of his home start?

  6. #697709
    On May 8th, 2009 at 5:30 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Before rushing to an opinion, make sure you understand the difference between wealthy versus someone who just happens to fall into the highest middle-class bracket of earned income. The wealthy can get their political buddies to insert tax code that only applies to them, code that only known to the citizen in question, his tax attorney and his pal in Congress.

    Amazing. I suppose it would be impossible for you to provide an example for us…

    ’cause then you’d have to shoot us.

    How did you come by this information?

  7. #697732
    On May 8th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    theloneranger said:

    I think it’s wise for those of you using “Obama” as someone to blame, to remember that Obama himself is nothing but an inexperienced Dweeb who is allowing himself to be used as a puppet by every Liberal S.O.B. in his Administration. I’m not saying don’t blame Obama, I’m saying root out the bastards that are really behind this guy.

    I repeated all of theloneranger’s comment as it’s exactly what I believe is happening. BHO is a puppet. He was groomed… I wonder who all are pulling the strings too.

  8. #697735
    On May 8th, 2009 at 5:53 pm, Ragspierre said:

    He was groomed… I wonder who all are pulling the strings too.

    A wonderful question.

    My personal favorites are Shellie Obama (FLOTUS and James Brown look-a-like), who I think is a very, very angry, mean person and a radical ideolog; G. Soros, master puppeteer, America hater, and very scary individual.

  9. #697744
    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, Dave Turson said:

    Tracking the story about the White House threatening a hedge fund (Perella Weinberg), this portion of a Business Insider article (May 5) grabbed my attention:

    Although the focus has so been on allegations that the White House threatened Perella Weinberg, sources familiar with the matter say that other firms felt they were threatened as well. None of the sources would agree to speak except on the condition of anonymity, citing fear of political repercussions.
    The sources, who represent creditors to Chrysler, say they were taken aback by the hardball tactics that the Obama administration employed to cajole them into acquiescing to plans to restructure Chrysler. One person described the administration as the most shocking “end justifies the means” group they have ever encountered. Another characterized Obama was “the most dangerous smooth talker on the planet- and I knew Kissinger.” Both were voters for Obama in the last election.
    One participant in negotiations said that the administration’s tactic was to present what one described as a “madman theory of the presidency” in which the President is someone to be feared because he was willing to do anything to get his way. The person said this threat was taken very seriously by his firm.
    The White House has denied the allegation that it threatened Perella Weinberg.

    To be fair, we survived Tricky Dicky, but can we survive Madman Barack?

  10. #697751
    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:15 pm, Ragspierre said:

    To be fair, we survived Tricky Dicky, but can we survive Madman Barack?

    Nixon was a piker, by comparison.

    Just look at Dick’s enemies list, compared to THE ONE’s….

  11. #697772
    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:56 pm, edelweiss said:

    #95
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, jjmurphy said:

    Put me down as not liking Warren Buffett either. Besides his being an Obama supporter, which is bad enough, he keeps harping on this death tax as a great thing. Look, my assets don’t come close to any taxable limit for inheritance taxes, but, dang it, that money is mine. I earned it, and I want it to go to my kids. If Buffett is so upset he is not going to be taxed enough when he dies, then he can pull out his checkbook at any time and write the Treasury a nice, big, fat check.

    I understand your concern JJMurthy, but you have to understand that taxing more the affluent Americans could yield up to $100 billion more revenue that could be used to expand health coverage to the nearly 50 million people who either don’t have any coverage or are underinsured. If Al Franken wins (which looks likely) we will have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, and soon after we can go ahead and overhaul our nation’s health system. We need to have mandatory health insurance for every person who lives in this country (including the undocumented people). A recent study comparing the quality of the U.S. system with western European countries found that the U.S. ranks last on performance measures of quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives. The U.S. stands out as the only wealthy country that does not ensure access to health care through universal coverage, and we need to change this. So guys, stop whining, there is nothing you Cons can do to derail President Obama’s plans.

  12. #697776
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:01 pm, Ragspierre said:

    A recent study comparing the quality of the U.S. system with western European countries found that the U.S. ranks last on performance measures of quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives.

    PUT.

    IT.

    UP.

  13. #697780
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:03 pm, flenser said:

    We need to have mandatory health insurance for every person who lives in this country (including the undocumented people).

    So you are saying that America must provide health insurance for the entire planet? Because that is what giving it to the “undocumented people”, aka illegal aliens, comes down to.

  14. #697782
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:05 pm, flenser said:

    The U.S. stands out as the only wealthy country that does not ensure access to health care through universal coverage, and we need to change this.

    By all means, explain why we need to change it.

  15. #697783
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:05 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The U.S. stands out as the only wealthy country that does not ensure access to health care through universal coverage, and we need to change this.

    So, it sounds like the US is a beacon of diversity, and a refuge of choice.

  16. #697792
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    WOW

    I just read the the article and I have not read a better summation than that.

    http://www.316Christianstore.biz

  17. #697799
    On May 8th, 2009 at 7:42 pm, Patronedheart said:

    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:56 pm, edelweiss said:
    #95
    On May 8th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, jjmurphy said:

    Put me down as not liking Warren Buffett either. Besides his being an Obama supporter, which is bad enough, he keeps harping on this death tax as a great thing. Look, my assets don’t come close to any taxable limit for inheritance taxes, but, dang it, that money is mine. I earned it, and I want it to go to my kids. If Buffett is so upset he is not going to be taxed enough when he dies, then he can pull out his checkbook at any time and write the Treasury a nice, big, fat check.
    I understand your concern JJMurthy, but you have to understand that taxing more the affluent Americans could yield up to $100 billion more revenue that could be used to expand health coverage to the nearly 50 million people who either don’t have any coverage or are underinsured. If Al Franken wins (which looks likely) we will have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, and soon after we can go ahead and overhaul our nation’s health system. We need to have mandatory health insurance for every person who lives in this country (including the undocumented people). A recent study comparing the quality of the U.S. system with western European countries found that the U.S. ranks last on performance measures of quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives. The U.S. stands out as the only wealthy country that does not ensure access to health care through universal coverage, and we need to change this. So guys, stop whining, there is nothing you Cons can do to derail President Obama’s plans.

    Tell ya what, edelwuss,
    go ahead and have your paycheck (that is if you have a job) direct deposited to the bank of the United States government, and let them decide how much you should keep of it, and how much some illegal with the sniffles should get in healthcare costs. Pretty soon, unless you’re a complete idiot (which doesn’t seem too unlikely), you’ll realize that working just isn’t worth it anymore since the government is giving everybody what they need. Now, mulitiply yourself by millions, and there you have it: a country completely dependant on the government, which is the antithesis of our constitution. But nevermind that silly piece of paper. It’s just a guideline…
    /sarc off

  18. #697814
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:04 pm, Jeff said:

    A recent study comparing the quality of the U.S. system with western European countries found that the U.S. ranks last on performance measures of quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives.

    Paid for Obama-Clinton for King/Queen

  19. #697816
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:08 pm, Jeff said:

    I would support National Health Care if politicians were given Medicaid coverage only. Reminds me of the doofus in Congress who lived on a food stamp budget for a month. It’s easy when lobbyists buy you 3 squares a day.

  20. #697817
    On May 8th, 2009 at 8:09 pm, Jeff said:

    Say…Wonder what congresspeople pay for their Gold-plated coverage ? Let us buy it for the same price. Sounds fair.

  21. #697878
    On May 8th, 2009 at 10:37 pm, jeanie said:

    Lordy! Lordy! Sooner or later this has got to backfire. When and how would be interesting if it weren’t so scarey. This Prez must be studying under Hugo and company. Power gone to his head and getting worse. Round and round, where will it stop?

  22. #697891
    On May 8th, 2009 at 11:17 pm, SHoward said:

    So guys, stop whining, there is nothing you Cons can do to derail President Obama’s plans.

    We’re not going to have to, little mountain flower. His plans are so far left that people in his own party a starting to back away.

    BTW, there were these people in 1917 that thought it was a good idea to kill off the czars and go a ‘progressive’ way. It didn’t turn out so good.

  23. #697969
    On May 9th, 2009 at 10:33 am, DBNinKY said:

    On May 8th, 2009 at 6:56 pm, edelweiss said:

    There is no way you’re a med student – at least not an even adequately informed one – as every competent member of the Allied Health field has resoundingly denounced the nationalized rationing of healthcare as morally unconscionable and an insurmountable detriment towards quality care.

  24. #697978
    On May 9th, 2009 at 10:49 am, DBNinKY said:

    I understand your concern JJMurthy, but you have to understand that taxing more the affluent Americans could yield up to $100 billion more revenue that could be used to expand health coverage to the nearly 50 million people who either don’t have any coverage or are underinsured.

    Health insurance is one of the incentives towards acquiring the skills and education necessary to obtain the type of jobs that offer such coverage.

    Having the government usurp this incentive is a negative on education, national production and self-direction, and will only lead to greater government dependence, with less revenue to meet those additional obligations.

  25. #697983
    On May 9th, 2009 at 10:55 am, Republicanvet said:

    Obama sneered that the dissenters were looking for “unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout.” But the holdouts never took banking bailout funds from Washington. And the targeted financial executives were simply doing what good money managers are supposed to do: put their clients’ fiduciary interests first.

    So…..at least Urkel recognizes bailouts are unjustified. What excuse does he have for flinging money every direction in his other bailouts?

    As for fiduciary duty, what would happen if a client went to a government regulator with a story of a manager ripping off the fund, or allowing it to be ripped off by some other private entity? I expect the government would come down on the manager like a ton of poo.

    I also expect the manager would be wide open to all kinds of lawsuits from clients for not carrying out their duty.

    But when a thug like Urkel is doing the ripping off, they just need to suck it up?

    Dictatorial Marxist!

  26. #697984
    On May 9th, 2009 at 10:55 am, DBNinKY said:

    “…affluent Americans could yield up to $100 billion more revenue… .”

    No it won’t; the rich will just stop investing – remember, they’ve already made their fortunes and have them tucked away in safes and banks around the world, well beyond the reach of US taxation.

    If Al Franken wins (which looks likely) we will have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, and soon after we can go ahead and overhaul our nation’s health system.

    The surest way to remove the Democrats from elected office, is to give complete ownership of it for a time; Americans do not like one party government, as was proven on 1994 and 2006.

  27. #697996
    On May 9th, 2009 at 11:57 am, AlohaGuy said:

    when the dog you feed bites your hand, you don’t roll up your sleeve and give him your arm. You get a new dog.

    Unless you’re an Obamite – you bend over and let the dog bite you in the butt.

  28. #697997
    On May 9th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, SHoward said:

    No it won’t; the rich will just stop investing – remember, they’ve already made their fortunes and have them tucked away in safes and banks around the world, well beyond the reach of US taxation.

    Well, I think the gov’t is on the verge of being able to find your money anywhere, so long as you reside in the US. Some, however, are relocating overseas, ala Jim Rogers, who now resides in Singapore, well beyond the current US wealth destroyers.

    It is true, however, that so long as the gov’t taxes only income and not wealth, people can indeed hide their money from taxation. The use of corporations makes it easy, as long as your corp doesn’t show much of a gain each year.

    Ignore the little mountain flower. She lives in some sort of dream world where everybody is running through the alps singing and dancing without a harsh care in the universe. Its painfully obvious she’s never had to pull herself through life for even an inch.

  29. #698002
    On May 9th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, sims said:

    …but you have to understand that taxing more the affluent Americans could yield up to $100 billion more revenue…

    The operative word here is could.

    …that could be used to expand health coverage to the more than 50 million people who either don’t have health coverage or are underinsured.

    Twelve million plus undocumented visitors and their children are included in that figure and many of the Americans included are young people who choose not to have health insurance to save money (sometimes even when they have the option they will take the cash rather than the benefit). Many states, like Wisconsin, already have government health care (used widely by undocumented visitors and their children, the poor, the indigent, and people who just don’t want to have to pay their own way). States who have these programs love the idea of Federal Government Health Care because that will put more dollars in their state’s coffers (because the programs are a sink hole for $ and are creating budgets from, well you know). We have a federal health program to ensure that children get medical attention. Why does anyone over the age of 18 need a babysitter?

    We need to have mandatory health insurance for every person who lives in this country (including the undocumented people).

    So, even if I would choose not to have health insurance I must have it. Even if I have it the government must make sure I am not “underinsured”. That $100 billion (along with the more than $600 billion already earmarked for health care) is chump change. Medicare is bankrupting US right now. What will universal health care for all who live here (inclucing undocumented people) do to US?

  30. #698003
    On May 9th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, sims said:

    More on the subject; greed can be a very good thing. Greed makes people strive for more. When greed is combined with power, especially absolute power, it is a very dangerous thing. In my opinion, power is the ultimate in bad motivators. The government and this administration seek to tax the rich because they want the money to consolidate their power and because they can, they will.
    Cliff’s essay was a good read. Most of us who agree with it already believed this. Many people now are drunk with the idea that the rich are being punished, some think they themselves will benefit, many don’t care if they themselves benefit as long as no one else has more than they do. I am absolutely sure that these policies will bring suffering to all of us. The scary thing is that this is the result that will satisfy many people.

  31. #698010
    On May 9th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Is this insane or what?

    Even if the A (H1N1) virus in Mexico proves no more lethal than a typical seasonal flu, it could still soon trigger the highest level six WHO pandemic alert once it has been identified as spreading widely between humans in different parts of the world.

    Margaret Chan, WHO director general, has stressed that an increase to level six is a technical change which does not mean that people around the world are at serious threat.

    In an interview with the FT earlier this week Ms Chan defended the organisation’s public statements. “I am not predicting the pandemic will blow up but if I miss it and we don’t prepare, I fail. I’d rather over-prepare than not prepare,” she said.

    Is this just a test for what world government would be like? The only way to govern globally is to keep people terrified and needy. You can’t just go into global government without experience. Is that what this is? Global warming, asteroids, pandemics… Is that what the UN is now about? Silly, ignorant people from the Stone Age sensing a path to world domination?

    There sure are some strong parallels between WHO and our Department of Homeland Security aren’t there? Childish incompetence being top of the list. Ignorance being next and arrogance close behind. They’re actually bunched up pretty close at the top.

  32. #698021
    On May 9th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, DannoJyd said:

    How long until these battered hedge fund managers are labeled as terrorists and kept under the watchfull eyes of Homeland Security? Maybe they already are.

  33. #698037
    On May 9th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, NC BLUE said:

    Excuse me–but all you socialists that want government health can kiss my grits. I’ve got great health care and don’t have a government screener and don’t have to wait for an appointment or surgery. Go to Canada or to the Brits if you want a government nanny. Your quality of life will decline and you can wait your turn. Leave the rest of us alone. How does the kool aid taste.

  34. #698076
    On May 9th, 2009 at 8:19 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Ive been doing research over the past year or so and some heavy soul searching this week. And I have come to some conclusions (and none of this includes violence).

    ) I am giving myself until June 1st to wrap things up and then I am wiping my current personae from the internet. (no symbolic meaning just a deadline)

    ) The Republican party, in its form today, has betrayed us and I will do everything I can to destroy its old guard and bring a new (old school) generation to the GOP. blah, blah, blah, vote republican because Dems are bad. Whatever…. Drug addicts need to hit bottom before they will save themselves.

    ) I shall become a chameleon and tout the Green Mantra while doing eveything in my power to reclaim my tax dollars from the government. Perhaps there should be a sudden flurry of 501(c) and fed/state Grant applications. Cant beat ‘em, join ‘em and control them.

    )I will then do everything I can to destroy the next generation of the Democratic party from within and without.

    ) Domestic Violence emergencies are the worst calls that a police officer can respond to. Thats because if you try to arrest, lets say a husband/boyfriend, you can almost be certainly guaranteed that the wife/girlfriend/sister is going to jump back into the fight also. So just because Texas may talk of secession, dont think that another country ‘attacking’ California or Massachusetts or our government interests will not receive the full response of the southern states. (He’s not heavy, he’s my brother)

    ) Research the Harvard Business School and other graduate programs. Theres an interesting class – ‘Dynamic Markets’ that was tailored to those joining Hedge Funds.

    ) Theres always a solution to a Gordian Knot but that does not necessarily mean that Occams Razor is it.

    ) Our system had been taken over by corruption – not ideology. Education and research by everyone, is the way to take back the power. Its time to pay the piper, but one doesnt pay the ferryman until he gets you to the other side (ok, that was just gratuitous)

    Im going snowboarding now, please talk amongst yourselves for the rest of the weekend.

  35. #698081
    On May 9th, 2009 at 8:44 pm, frontierguy said:

    When the wealthy stop investing the market will crash and 401k holders will be up the creek. It won’t matter much, univeral health care will end up lowering the life expectancy. The wealthy people put Obama in power, and it is not as if he did not tell them what he was going to do. I can’t believe they have the gall to be upset about it now.

  36. #698097
    On May 9th, 2009 at 9:40 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 8th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Well, you form a charitable trust and donate all sources of income to it. The trust then, pays your living expenses until you die when the proceeds, if any, are donated to the actual charities.

    Then there’s the 30-35 billion he kicked in to Gates’s foundation…

  37. #698119
    On May 10th, 2009 at 12:14 am, Ragspierre said:

    Theres always a solution to a Gordian Knot but that does not necessarily mean that Occams Razor is it.

    Well, that was hilarious…!!!!

  38. #698163
    On May 10th, 2009 at 10:20 am, Ragspierre said:

    Mr Obama said last week that it was “an aberration” that profits in the financial sector had grown so large over the last decade. It was ridiculous he suggested, that “25-year-olds (were) getting million-dollar bonuses, (and) they were willing to pay $100 for a steak dinner and the waiter was getting the kinds of tips that would make a college professor envious.”

    The Telegraph

    So, THE ONE DOES believe in trickle-down theory, and knows it works.

    He just doesn’t approve

  39. #698274
    On May 11th, 2009 at 3:03 am, conservative in europe said:

    OK,

    Want a story about government helathcare – here’s one:

    Last week, my knee started to give me trouble. So, I went to the doctor assigned to me by the wonderful government of the European Country I live in. The Doc (a very professional, well educated individual) looked at my knee (no x ray) and said I had osteoarthritis, handed me a cane and said there was nothing more to be done.

    Let’s break this down to reality:
    - No X ray (No reason to spend that extra money)
    - No treatment (take a cane).

    There are two reasons for these actions, the first is that penny pinching civil servants administer the health care system and the second is that the “cane” means I would be disabled. Getting the “cane” would mean that my monthly benefits check from the government would go up enough that I could quit working. The doc handing me the cane, for most Europeans, would be like winning the lottery.

    Luckily, I am not European. Being an American, I do not consider a little pain in my knee to be a disability. That would be an insult to people who are actually disabled.

    So, I got on the phone, called an Orthopedist in the USA who will do whatever medical tests are necessary to determine my actual condition and the causes, attempt to heal the problem and give me advice on how not the have a recurrence. It’s going to cost me some money – including a plane ticket – but, hey, I will actually receive helathcare instead of administration.

    Anyone who thinks Euro-style healthcare is a better system has never lived here.

  40. #698275
    On May 11th, 2009 at 3:06 am, conservative in europe said:

    helathcare

    I swear I previewed my rant twice before posting..

  41. #698377
    On May 11th, 2009 at 9:22 am, Ragspierre said:

    Thanks for ranting…!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, Chrysler



Pundit & Pundette

» Various and sundry
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook