<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC: Funding Cronyism of Color</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lloyd, FCC Diversity Czar, and Cass Sustein, Regulatory Czar: Progressive Radical Socialist Silencing of Free Speech On Internet Blogs and Talk Radio &#171; Pronk Palisades</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-790808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lloyd, FCC Diversity Czar, and Cass Sustein, Regulatory Czar: Progressive Radical Socialist Silencing of Free Speech On Internet Blogs and Talk Radio &#171; Pronk Palisades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-790808</guid>
		<description>[...] Previous: FCC: Funding Cronyism of Color &#8230;&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previous: FCC: Funding Cronyism of Color &#8230;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Cone of Silence&#8221; for Conservative Radio &#38; Internet: Media Diversity Not for Diversity of Ideas, but for Diversity of Skin Color &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-708227</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Cone of Silence&#8221; for Conservative Radio &#38; Internet: Media Diversity Not for Diversity of Ideas, but for Diversity of Skin Color &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-708227</guid>
		<description>[...] John T. Simpson, Big Hollywood: What if President Obama Were a Republican? Michelle Malkin: FCC: Funding Cronyism of Color and Fairness Doctrine Watch: The FCC’s “Diversity Panel” and Crushing of dissent in the Age [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John T. Simpson, Big Hollywood: What if President Obama Were a Republican? Michelle Malkin: FCC: Funding Cronyism of Color and Fairness Doctrine Watch: The FCC’s “Diversity Panel” and Crushing of dissent in the Age [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaceycakes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698433</link>
		<dc:creator>spaceycakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698433</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bogtrotter&lt;/strong&gt; said: 
How many of the “advisory boards” would be controlled by groups like ACORN from day one?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

All of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Bogtrotter</strong> said:<br />
How many of the “advisory boards” would be controlled by groups like ACORN from day one?</p></blockquote>
<p>All of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservative in europe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698276</link>
		<dc:creator>conservative in europe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 07:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698276</guid>
		<description>In 1987, AM radio was so close to being dead, the Buzzards were fighting next to the body.  Doing away with the FD made the business decision (a huge risk at the time) to make conservative radio talk shows possible.

Conservative radio (generally on AM) became one of the most successful media formats of all time. No one forced people to listen.  We listened because, finally, after decades of having nothing but Liberal spew on the airways, someone got on the radio and said what we were all thinking.  

A majority of people agree with conservative radio hosts.  This is why the Liberals are attacking Limbaugh.  They aren&#039;t attacking politicians.  Why not?  It&#039;s because we agree with Rush.  A majority of us.  

If the Libs can change our opinions about Rush and his colleagues, they can run the political voice of Conservatism off the airways.

It isn&#039;t about controlling airways, It&#039;s about controlling votes.  Democrats may act like bumbling, stupid lemmings but when it comes to politics, they never bring a knife to a gunfight.

If only the GOP could fight as well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1987, AM radio was so close to being dead, the Buzzards were fighting next to the body.  Doing away with the FD made the business decision (a huge risk at the time) to make conservative radio talk shows possible.</p>
<p>Conservative radio (generally on AM) became one of the most successful media formats of all time. No one forced people to listen.  We listened because, finally, after decades of having nothing but Liberal spew on the airways, someone got on the radio and said what we were all thinking.  </p>
<p>A majority of people agree with conservative radio hosts.  This is why the Liberals are attacking Limbaugh.  They aren&#8217;t attacking politicians.  Why not?  It&#8217;s because we agree with Rush.  A majority of us.  </p>
<p>If the Libs can change our opinions about Rush and his colleagues, they can run the political voice of Conservatism off the airways.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t about controlling airways, It&#8217;s about controlling votes.  Democrats may act like bumbling, stupid lemmings but when it comes to politics, they never bring a knife to a gunfight.</p>
<p>If only the GOP could fight as well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogtrotter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698203</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogtrotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698203</guid>
		<description>How many of the &quot;advisory boards&quot; would be controlled by groups like ACORN from day one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many of the &#8220;advisory boards&#8221; would be controlled by groups like ACORN from day one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txvet2</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698175</link>
		<dc:creator>txvet2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698175</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Aides to Clyburn said he had not spoken with Obama about the FCC post for his daughter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course not.  Nancy carried a hand-written note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aides to Clyburn said he had not spoken with Obama about the FCC post for his daughter.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course not.  Nancy carried a hand-written note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698122</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 05:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698122</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/politics/story/67296.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama to name congressman&#039;s daughter to FCC&lt;/a&gt;

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to nominate House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn&#039;s daughter to a seat on the Federal Communications Commission, a powerful agency that regulates issues ranging from TV profanity to broadband Internet access. 

Mignon Clyburn, the eldest of the South Carolina Democrat&#039;s three daughters, is a Charleston native who has served on the South Carolina Public Service Commission since 1998.

Obama&#039;s promotion of Jim Clyburn&#039;s daughter — which the Senate must confirm — would further strengthen the president&#039;s relationship with a key congressional ally who helped move his $787 billion economic-stimulus plan quickly through the House in February. 

&quot;She is very competent and accomplished, someone of whom I am very proud,&quot; the congressman said.

Aides to Clyburn said he had not spoken with Obama about the FCC post for his daughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/politics/story/67296.html" rel="nofollow">Obama to name congressman&#8217;s daughter to FCC</a></p>
<p>WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to nominate House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn&#8217;s daughter to a seat on the Federal Communications Commission, a powerful agency that regulates issues ranging from TV profanity to broadband Internet access. </p>
<p>Mignon Clyburn, the eldest of the South Carolina Democrat&#8217;s three daughters, is a Charleston native who has served on the South Carolina Public Service Commission since 1998.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s promotion of Jim Clyburn&#8217;s daughter — which the Senate must confirm — would further strengthen the president&#8217;s relationship with a key congressional ally who helped move his $787 billion economic-stimulus plan quickly through the House in February. </p>
<p>&#8220;She is very competent and accomplished, someone of whom I am very proud,&#8221; the congressman said.</p>
<p>Aides to Clyburn said he had not spoken with Obama about the FCC post for his daughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuscleDaddy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698111</link>
		<dc:creator>MuscleDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 02:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698111</guid>
		<description>Dick Durbin tried to slip the &quot;Localism&quot;   Fairness-Doctrine-Backdoor in to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e3gazette.com/2009/03/death-of-fairness-doctrine-and-dick.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DC Voting Rights Bill this year&lt;/a&gt;.

That particular Bill died, but now we see a new backdoor Fairness Doctrine in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e3gazette.com/2009/05/hr-1966-megan-meier-cyberbullying.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;H.R. 1966: Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act&lt;/a&gt;.

They&#039;re going to keep trying until one slips past - and like a suicide-bomber, it only takes one slipping past...

 - MuscleDaddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Durbin tried to slip the &#8220;Localism&#8221;   Fairness-Doctrine-Backdoor in to the <a href="http://www.e3gazette.com/2009/03/death-of-fairness-doctrine-and-dick.html" rel="nofollow">DC Voting Rights Bill this year</a>.</p>
<p>That particular Bill died, but now we see a new backdoor Fairness Doctrine in <a href="http://www.e3gazette.com/2009/05/hr-1966-megan-meier-cyberbullying.html" rel="nofollow">H.R. 1966: Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act</a>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re going to keep trying until one slips past &#8211; and like a suicide-bomber, it only takes one slipping past&#8230;</p>
<p> &#8211; MuscleDaddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txvet2</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698079</link>
		<dc:creator>txvet2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698079</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On May 9th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, SakakiO said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s pretty much the same here, and I would guess just about everywhere.  It isn&#039;t as if there are only 2-3 radio stations within hearing.  There are probably 20 within reasonable distance of San Antonio, and probably half are in Spanish.  Any one of them produces more than 3 hours a day of local programming.  The rub is which hours of the day, because during the prime daytime hours, most who are listening at all listen to talk radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On May 9th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, SakakiO said: </p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty much the same here, and I would guess just about everywhere.  It isn&#8217;t as if there are only 2-3 radio stations within hearing.  There are probably 20 within reasonable distance of San Antonio, and probably half are in Spanish.  Any one of them produces more than 3 hours a day of local programming.  The rub is which hours of the day, because during the prime daytime hours, most who are listening at all listen to talk radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SakakiO</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698077</link>
		<dc:creator>SakakiO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698077</guid>
		<description>Wait...3 hours a week?

Let me take a look at what that brings in Portland, OR:

KXL 750 - M-F 5A-9A - Portland&#039;s Local News (Local); Lars Larson (local/regional) - 12-3

KEX 1190 - M-F 5a-9a - Morning Update with Paul Linnman (local); 4-7p Mark &amp; Dave (local)

KPAM 860 - M-F 5-9a - Bob Miller in the Morning (local); 5-8p - Victoria Taft (local)

------------

Those are the big 3 conservative talk stations. They carry the local programming required by FCC for localism, as well as locally produced shows on the weekend. 

Now, why the hell do we need these rules? Is there any way we can short-circuit these rules BEFORE they gets put in? Like maybe a court case or overthrowing Obama&#039;s ass?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230;3 hours a week?</p>
<p>Let me take a look at what that brings in Portland, OR:</p>
<p>KXL 750 &#8211; M-F 5A-9A &#8211; Portland&#8217;s Local News (Local); Lars Larson (local/regional) &#8211; 12-3</p>
<p>KEX 1190 &#8211; M-F 5a-9a &#8211; Morning Update with Paul Linnman (local); 4-7p Mark &amp; Dave (local)</p>
<p>KPAM 860 &#8211; M-F 5-9a &#8211; Bob Miller in the Morning (local); 5-8p &#8211; Victoria Taft (local)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Those are the big 3 conservative talk stations. They carry the local programming required by FCC for localism, as well as locally produced shows on the weekend. </p>
<p>Now, why the hell do we need these rules? Is there any way we can short-circuit these rules BEFORE they gets put in? Like maybe a court case or overthrowing Obama&#8217;s ass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooMuchTime</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698036</link>
		<dc:creator>TooMuchTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698036</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, it they take Rush, Hannity, Boortz, Beck, Laura, etc, off the air, I won’t listen to the radio again. &lt;em&gt;Think of the millions lost in ads.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is the only battleground where they will lose with the Fairness Doctrine or localization. If no one is listening, then no one will advertize.  No ads, no money. No money, no - &lt;em&gt;wait for it!&lt;/em&gt; - &lt;strong&gt;Tax Revenue.&lt;/strong&gt;

How many people listen to Rush Limbaugh every day? Tens of millions. Do you really believe that advertizers will find someone else, &lt;em&gt;non-conservative&lt;/em&gt;, to take his place? No, they won&#039;t. The heads of the radio networks will tell congress not to pass FD or localization. They will do it anyway. Which should give us a &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VERY&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; big stick in the 2012 elections. Remember, even unemployed radio workers get to vote.

Dr. Peter Venkman (talking to the Mayor): &lt;em&gt;&quot;Lenny, you will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, it they take Rush, Hannity, Boortz, Beck, Laura, etc, off the air, I won’t listen to the radio again. <em>Think of the millions lost in ads.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This is the only battleground where they will lose with the Fairness Doctrine or localization. If no one is listening, then no one will advertize.  No ads, no money. No money, no &#8211; <em>wait for it!</em> &#8211; <strong>Tax Revenue.</strong></p>
<p>How many people listen to Rush Limbaugh every day? Tens of millions. Do you really believe that advertizers will find someone else, <em>non-conservative</em>, to take his place? No, they won&#8217;t. The heads of the radio networks will tell congress not to pass FD or localization. They will do it anyway. Which should give us a <em><strong>VERY</strong></em> big stick in the 2012 elections. Remember, even unemployed radio workers get to vote.</p>
<p>Dr. Peter Venkman (talking to the Mayor): <em>&#8220;Lenny, you will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698033</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 20:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698033</guid>
		<description>Hussein is not the type to do anything above board. He sneaks through the allyways to accomplish his goals. Like trying to control the gun and ammo market rather than just banning guns. He&#039;s also like a magician where he directs your attention to one thing, while pulling off the trick from another direction where you&#039;re not looking.

He is a very devious person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hussein is not the type to do anything above board. He sneaks through the allyways to accomplish his goals. Like trying to control the gun and ammo market rather than just banning guns. He&#8217;s also like a magician where he directs your attention to one thing, while pulling off the trick from another direction where you&#8217;re not looking.</p>
<p>He is a very devious person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArizonaNeanderthal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-698009</link>
		<dc:creator>ArizonaNeanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-698009</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;no2pcbs1&lt;/strong&gt; said
President Obama is on record opposing the return of the Fairness Doctrine”, sure but he is known to lie all the time&lt;/blockquote&gt; And it does not seem to bother him one bit-none of the Big Media calls him on it. After broadcast media they will come after the blogs. I ordered my shortwave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<strong>no2pcbs1</strong> said<br />
President Obama is on record opposing the return of the Fairness Doctrine”, sure but he is known to lie all the time</p></blockquote>
<p> And it does not seem to bother him one bit-none of the Big Media calls him on it. After broadcast media they will come after the blogs. I ordered my shortwave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2pcbs1</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-697999</link>
		<dc:creator>no2pcbs1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-697999</guid>
		<description>President Obama is on record opposing the return of the Fairness Doctrine”, sure but he is known to lie all the time. when zero talks he wears a mask, when he acts he takes it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is on record opposing the return of the Fairness Doctrine”, sure but he is known to lie all the time. when zero talks he wears a mask, when he acts he takes it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/08/fcc-funding-cronyism-of-color/comment-page-1/#comment-697965</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27593#comment-697965</guid>
		<description>The brown shirts and jack boots are not far behind. What have we allowed these idiots to do to our country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brown shirts and jack boots are not far behind. What have we allowed these idiots to do to our country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

