Earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal blew the whistle on NY Fed chairman Stephen Friedman’s massive Goldman Sachs conflict of interest.
Friedman — former chair of Goldman Sachs — resigned from the NY Fed yesterday, but obstinately insists he did nothing wrong. Friedman is inextricably linked to Obama Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who served as NY Fed president and made a waiver request on behalf of Friedman.
Here’s the Friedman resignation letter.
“Government Sachs” dominated the Bush Treasury and continues to dominate the Obama Treasury.
Left-leaning columnist Robert Scheer sums up the outrage — and the lack of more widespread outrage — well:
We are so inured to tales of business corruption that even a devastating exposé in The Wall Street Journal no longer shocks us. The fact that the chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank made millions off his secret purchase of Goldman Sachs stock, “in violation of Federal Reserve policy,” as the WSJ put it, at a time when the N.Y. Fed was ostensibly overseeing the antics of the Wall Street firm, has barely registered a blip of outrage.
When N.Y. Fed Chairman Stephen Friedman bought stock in the company that he once headed, and where he still serves as a director, he was already in violation of Federal Reserve policy and was hoping for a waiver to permit him to hold his existing multi-million-dollar stock stash and to remain on the Goldman board. The waiver was requested last October by Timothy Geithner, then the president of the N.Y. Fed and now Treasury secretary. Yet, without having received that waiver, Friedman went ahead in December and purchased 37,300 additional shares. With shares he added in January, after the waiver was granted, he ended up with 98,600 shares in Goldman Sachs, worth a total of $13,330,720 at the close of trading on Monday.
Friedman was in violation of the Fed’s policy because, thanks in part to the urging of Geithner and the N.Y. Fed, Goldman Sachs was allowed to become a bank holding company, making it eligible for government bailout funds (an option that Geithner had denied to Goldman rival Lehman Brothers). But that shift also put Goldman under more rigorous banking regulations that required Friedman as Class C director of the N.Y. Fed, a position in which he ostensibly represents the public instead of the banks who dominate the board, to step down as a Goldman director and divest his holdings. Instead, he stayed on the Goldman board and added additional shares while waiting for the Fed waiver. Nor did he inform the Federal Reserve of his additional purchases last December, and the lawyers for the N.Y. Fed didn’t know about that purchase until the WSJ raised questions in April. Friedman has made a profit of about $3 million on the additional shares.
Where is President Obama to assail greedy, selfish “speculators” now?blog comments powered by Disqus
May 23, 2013 10:00 AM by Michelle Malkin
March 4, 2013 03:07 PM by Doug Powers
October 30, 2013 08:52 AM by Michelle Malkin
December 4, 2012 08:00 PM by Doug Powers
December 1, 2012 11:37 AM by Doug Powers