<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m not cheering Senate GOP&#8217;s blockage of Interior nominee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:30:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ScottyDog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-701033</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-701033</guid>
		<description>The Constitution never authorized the federal Government to own any land except that was needed to preserve and protect this country.

All of the vast holdings of the Feds is unconstitutional.They should have been auctioned or sold of privately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution never authorized the federal Government to own any land except that was needed to preserve and protect this country.</p>
<p>All of the vast holdings of the Feds is unconstitutional.They should have been auctioned or sold of privately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm Chaser</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700519</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm Chaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700519</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I am wrong, but my understanding is in the beginning the government owned virtually all of the land. Titles passed to private individuals through homesteading and purchases. Much of the West was never thickly settled, and the government kept the land. It leases property for grazing, energy exploration and other uses. 

National parks belong to all of the people and we  pay for their maintainance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I am wrong, but my understanding is in the beginning the government owned virtually all of the land. Titles passed to private individuals through homesteading and purchases. Much of the West was never thickly settled, and the government kept the land. It leases property for grazing, energy exploration and other uses. </p>
<p>National parks belong to all of the people and we  pay for their maintainance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700509</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700509</guid>
		<description>One question I have is why does the US government own or claim to own vast expanses of land within the various states. i.e. Why are there national parks. Why isn&#039;t Grand Canyon for example an AZ State park?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question I have is why does the US government own or claim to own vast expanses of land within the various states. i.e. Why are there national parks. Why isn&#8217;t Grand Canyon for example an AZ State park?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MUT&#8217;s Money Links! &#124; The American Freedom Network</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700491</link>
		<dc:creator>MUT&#8217;s Money Links! &#124; The American Freedom Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700491</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin is likewise not impressed at the national-level, as Senate Republicans blocked President Obama’s nominee to be deputy Interior secretary amid a fight over the agency’s new rules on oil and gas drilling, the first administration appointee to be turned back on a floor vote. The money quote: Great. Now, the libs can justifiably accuse the GOP of exploiting the nomination process for political ends. Way to go restoring the “brand.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin is likewise not impressed at the national-level, as Senate Republicans blocked President Obama’s nominee to be deputy Interior secretary amid a fight over the agency’s new rules on oil and gas drilling, the first administration appointee to be turned back on a floor vote. The money quote: Great. Now, the libs can justifiably accuse the GOP of exploiting the nomination process for political ends. Way to go restoring the “brand.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instapundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MICHELLE MALKIN: Why I’m not cheering Senate GOP’s blockage of Interior nominee&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700200</link>
		<dc:creator>Instapundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MICHELLE MALKIN: Why I’m not cheering Senate GOP’s blockage of Interior nominee&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700200</guid>
		<description>[...] MICHELLE MALKIN: Why I’m not cheering Senate GOP’s blockage of Interior nominee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MICHELLE MALKIN: Why I’m not cheering Senate GOP’s blockage of Interior nominee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Member-VRWC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700118</link>
		<dc:creator>Member-VRWC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700118</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On May 13th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, lgm said: 
This post would get MM branded as a RINO, especially because I agree with her on this. There’s hope for the world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As usual, lgm, you&#039;ve got it wrong and demonstrate you don&#039;t even know what a RINO is.  Unlike liberals who march in lockstep in support of all things Democrat and in disagreement with all things Republican, conservatives have no problem expressing their disgust at either party when they are stinking up the joint.

When conservatives complain about the spending binge the government is on, liberals say why didn&#039;t you complain when Bush was POTUS.  The fact is this forum had plenty of people commenting negatively on Bush&#039;s entitlement spending, lack of border enforcement, etc.  We criticized then and we&#039;re going to criticize now that BO owns the current disaster.  And whether you, the fawning Obama-obsessed media, and BO himself want to admit it or not, he owns it now.  

MM is sticking up for principles, something neither a RINO nor a Democrat would ever do.  You agree with her simply because she is commenting on the GOP&#039;s lackluster performance... again.  You&#039;ll always agree with that POV.

But you taking a critical look at the Democrats when they do something that erodes the foundation of this country?  It&#039;s not possible.  You lack the thinking gene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On May 13th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, lgm said:<br />
This post would get MM branded as a RINO, especially because I agree with her on this. There’s hope for the world.</p></blockquote>
<p>As usual, lgm, you&#8217;ve got it wrong and demonstrate you don&#8217;t even know what a RINO is.  Unlike liberals who march in lockstep in support of all things Democrat and in disagreement with all things Republican, conservatives have no problem expressing their disgust at either party when they are stinking up the joint.</p>
<p>When conservatives complain about the spending binge the government is on, liberals say why didn&#8217;t you complain when Bush was POTUS.  The fact is this forum had plenty of people commenting negatively on Bush&#8217;s entitlement spending, lack of border enforcement, etc.  We criticized then and we&#8217;re going to criticize now that BO owns the current disaster.  And whether you, the fawning Obama-obsessed media, and BO himself want to admit it or not, he owns it now.  </p>
<p>MM is sticking up for principles, something neither a RINO nor a Democrat would ever do.  You agree with her simply because she is commenting on the GOP&#8217;s lackluster performance&#8230; again.  You&#8217;ll always agree with that POV.</p>
<p>But you taking a critical look at the Democrats when they do something that erodes the foundation of this country?  It&#8217;s not possible.  You lack the thinking gene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700055</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700055</guid>
		<description>This post would get MM branded as a RINO, especially because I agree with her on this.  There&#039;s hope for the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post would get MM branded as a RINO, especially because I agree with her on this.  There&#8217;s hope for the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simcoe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700047</link>
		<dc:creator>simcoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700047</guid>
		<description>A thought:

This actually had less to do with Obama really wanting David J. Hayes in the slot and more about payback for favors Hayes did for O. 

Putting Hayes’ name up for appointment knowing he most likely wouldn’t make it paid back whatever political favor Obama thought he owed Hayes. It cost Obama nothing and now the slate is clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thought:</p>
<p>This actually had less to do with Obama really wanting David J. Hayes in the slot and more about payback for favors Hayes did for O. </p>
<p>Putting Hayes’ name up for appointment knowing he most likely wouldn’t make it paid back whatever political favor Obama thought he owed Hayes. It cost Obama nothing and now the slate is clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-700004</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-700004</guid>
		<description>GOP = WHIG.  

These clowns do the wrong thing for the wrong reason more often than not.  

This is another of the reasons I am no longer a Republican...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP = WHIG.  </p>
<p>These clowns do the wrong thing for the wrong reason more often than not.  </p>
<p>This is another of the reasons I am no longer a Republican&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawhawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-699967</link>
		<dc:creator>lawhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-699967</guid>
		<description>Hold the phone Michelle,

This wasn&#039;t a party line vote, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawhawk.blogspot.com/2009/05/who-blocked-this-nomination.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;story has been misreported&lt;/a&gt;. 

This is about Reid being incapable of counting the votes. He knew that Kerry, Kennedy and Mukloski were absent - and had two of the three been present, Hayes would have passed.

The vote could have been delayed until that was the case, but instead, this was a political trick to make the GOP look bad - and the media aided and abetted with their shoddy reporting.

Besides, it wasn&#039;t a party line vote - given that two of the GOPers voted to approve Hayes (Snowe and Kyl). 

If you want to cast blame on the vote failing, it rests squarely on Harry Reid and no one else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold the phone Michelle,</p>
<p>This wasn&#8217;t a party line vote, and the <a href="http://lawhawk.blogspot.com/2009/05/who-blocked-this-nomination.html" rel="nofollow">story has been misreported</a>. </p>
<p>This is about Reid being incapable of counting the votes. He knew that Kerry, Kennedy and Mukloski were absent &#8211; and had two of the three been present, Hayes would have passed.</p>
<p>The vote could have been delayed until that was the case, but instead, this was a political trick to make the GOP look bad &#8211; and the media aided and abetted with their shoddy reporting.</p>
<p>Besides, it wasn&#8217;t a party line vote &#8211; given that two of the GOPers voted to approve Hayes (Snowe and Kyl). </p>
<p>If you want to cast blame on the vote failing, it rests squarely on Harry Reid and no one else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-699942</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-699942</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;at they &lt;/blockquote&gt;

at &lt;em&gt;least&lt;/em&gt; they....sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>at they </p></blockquote>
<p>at <em>least</em> they&#8230;.sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-699941</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-699941</guid>
		<description>who cares who they stopped?? at they had the guts to finally stand up against the dems...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares who they stopped?? at they had the guts to finally stand up against the dems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legalbgl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-699934</link>
		<dc:creator>legalbgl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-699934</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In addition, three Democrats who would support Hayes were absent — Sens. Edward M. Kennedy (Mass.), John Kerry (Mass.) and Barbara Mikulski (Md.).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wait, three dems who support his nomination could not be bothered to vote and its the republican&#039;s who obstructed the nomination and are playing political games?  Anyone think that maybe these dems were told not to vote to make it LOOK like the republicans obstructed the vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In addition, three Democrats who would support Hayes were absent — Sens. Edward M. Kennedy (Mass.), John Kerry (Mass.) and Barbara Mikulski (Md.).</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait, three dems who support his nomination could not be bothered to vote and its the republican&#8217;s who obstructed the nomination and are playing political games?  Anyone think that maybe these dems were told not to vote to make it LOOK like the republicans obstructed the vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-699931</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-699931</guid>
		<description>They are &quot;listeners&quot; now. &quot;Doers&quot; is just not in their DNA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are &#8220;listeners&#8221; now. &#8220;Doers&#8221; is just not in their DNA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filibustered! &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/13/why-im-not-cheering-senate-gops-blockage-of-interior-nominee/comment-page-1/#comment-699919</link>
		<dc:creator>Filibustered! &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=27742#comment-699919</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s post is titled &#8220;Why I&#8217;m not cheering Senate GOP&#8217;s blockage of Interior nominee.&#8221; She ends with this: Great. Now, the libs can justifiably accuse the GOP of exploiting the nomination process for political ends. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s post is titled &#8220;Why I&#8217;m not cheering Senate GOP&#8217;s blockage of Interior nominee.&#8221; She ends with this: Great. Now, the libs can justifiably accuse the GOP of exploiting the nomination process for political ends. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
