According to President Obama, that’s how we ought to discuss abortion. These were the fair-minded words We ought to have open hearts and minds. Pro-choice people should not assume that pro-lifers are “simply … ideologue[s] who wanted to inflict suffering on women ….” Here are the fair minded words that Obama used in a radio ad to attack John McCain.

“Let me tell you: If Roe vs. Wade is overturned, the lives and health of women will be put at risk. That’s why this election is so important,” the Obama ad contends. “John McCain’s out of touch with women today. McCain wants to take away our right to choose. That’s what women need to understand. That’s how high the stakes are.”

.
Well, at least he didn’t call him a right wing ideologue

Does that sound “fair minded” to you?

The term “Pro-Choice” is complete nonsense!

I don’t use that term because 1) It isn’t “pro-choice,” it is “pro-abortion. 2) It is a lie. I don’t know if I met a single person, man, woman, or child alive since I was born, who is against choice. People want the choice of which movie to watch, which flavor ice cream to enjoy, which vacation spot to visit, which seat to take at the stadium, what color their walls will be painted, which plumber, carpenter, or electrician to hire, and so forth.

Pro-choice is a meaningless word without attaching the available choices.

In abortion the term “Pro-choice” can be completed with the following:

“Pro-choice for having someone butcher my baby,”

or “Pro-choice to have a baby cut, pulled apart, burned alive, or birthed and slaughtered while existing the womb, and, of course, left to die, or even killed AFTER baby survives all of the list of slaughter methods mentioned above.”

Yes, pro-choice is a nonsense and dishonest word, for everyone is “Pro-choice” because we all want to choose our meal, or spouse, our lawn mower, which shirt to wear, what temperature to set the thermostat, and so forth.

No, abortion advocates don’t finish the sentence and we all know what they mean.

Another reason

Let’s call this barbaric act something more precise and descriptive, something which actually airs their dirty laundry.

Examples (Some already suggested above) can include “Pro-slaughter of innocent babies,”

or “Pro-hiring a hit man to kill a child,”

or “Pro-depriving innocent new human beings of their lives,”

or “Pro-violation of the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of the newest and most defenseless among us.”

What do you think?

William

At least I’m not a plagiarizing parrot.

You’re PATHETIC.

I am pro-choice myself but I can recognize the difference between colateral damage in warfare and abortion. Nice try though.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Liberal minds are just wasted.

The rest of you are a little too stupid for replies.

I am against killing defenseless fetuses in the womb.

I am in support of killing people like Sadam Hussein and his henchmen (one of their tactics was to drive nails into the heads of their victims while forcing their family members to watch).

Are we clear on the difference?

englishqueen01 w bombed weddings – ripping apart men, women and children – why don’t you have a problem with that?

The rest of you are a little too stupid forreplies.

When will you “pro-lifers” protest war?

It’s hypocritical, and downright pathetic, that supposedly intelligent liberals can’t discern the difference between ripping apart a baby in the womb and defending a nation against unjust aggressors.

What act(s) of terrorism were committed by the 50 million-plus babies aborted since 1973? And how is it justified that you can defend a woman’s “right” to destroy this supposed enemy…but not the right of a nation to defend the lives of its civilians?

If Obama wants to limit the number of abortions…

why is he subsidizing them?

Duh…. ‘cuz he’s a lyin’ basturd?!

Actions, not words determine the man.

War sucks wish we didn’t have them.

However your attempt to make a moral equivalence between war and abortion is flawed. An aborted child is a victim of a potential mother’s choice. Not so with war.

Your argument is shallow and inept.