The ever-increasing cost of c(r)ap-and-t(i)rade

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 18, 2009 03:27 PM

If you haven’t phoned your congressional reps yet over the ever-increasing cost of the Dems’ c(r)ap-and-t(i)rade global warming proposals, what are you waiting for? Call 202-224-3121.

As I’ve noted before, the national eco-taxes are in trouble with nervous Blue Dog Democrats. But the plan isn’t going to go down without the mobilization of tens of thousands of Tea Party activists spreading the word and pressuring both parties in Congress.

The Heritage Foundation has just released a new economic analysis of the Waxman-Markey bill:

Though the proposed legislation would have little impact on world temperatures, it is a massive energy tax in disguise that promises job losses, income cuts, and a sharp left turn toward big government.

Ultimately, this bill would result in government-set caps on energy use that damage the economy and hobble growth–the very growth that supports investment and innovation. Analysis of the economic impact of Waxman-Markey projects that by 2035 the bill would:

* Reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $9.6 trillion;
* Destroy 1,105,000 jobs on average, with peak years seeing unemployment rise by over 2,479,000 jobs;
* Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation;
* Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent;
* Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent;
* Raise an average family’s annual energy bill by $1,500; and
* Increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 26 percent, or $29,150 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.

The Washington Examiner weighs in: “That is a prescription for wrecking American prosperity for decades to come.”

Haven’t we been force-fed enough of those recipes already?

***

Get on the phone.

Several key Democrats from industrial and oil states threw their support behind a draft climate bill Monday as a House committee began work on massive legislation that would impose the first nationwide limits on greenhouse gases.

While Democratic sponsors of the 948-page bill called it essential to shift the nation away from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources and deal with global warming, Republicans argued it would send energy prices soaring and threaten economic growth.

“Our nation is at a crossroads,” declared Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the committee’s chairman “We can continue to look the other way and leave these problems to our children, or we can adopt a new energy policy for America.”

Waxman in recent weeks has spearheaded delicate closed-door negotiations with other Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee, hoping to structure the bill so as to get enough support to push it to the House floor, despite expected unified Republican opposition.

The negotiations appeared to bear fruit when two key Democrats on the committee—Reps. John Dingell of Michigan and Gene Green of Texas—announced their support of the bill. Last week, Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., who has had protection of coal interests a priority, also endorsed the legislation.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. “The Ever-Increasing Cost of C(r)ap-and-T(i)rade” « Patriot Burr
  2. The ever-increasing cost of c(r)ap-and-t(i)rade. Beyond Alarming
  3. Hyscience
  4. Government’s Grand Con Game: Waxman-Markey Energy Tax Bill Benefits Obama’s Tax Revenue Coffers & Nothing Else « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  5. Cap and Trade: It’s Hip to be Marx! | The Great Illuminator
  6. No “Global Warming” in Arizona - Coldest June on Record Since 1913 « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  7. Nancy Pelosi Is Trying to Do WHAT This Friday? Ram Through Energy Tax Bill with Cap and Trade without It Being Fully Reviewed Americans Knowing How High Their Taxes Will Go « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  8. Pelosi Pounding Drum Louder for Cap-and-Trade Vote This Friday, WSJ Exposes What Americans Will Pay for Waxman-Markey Energy Bill « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  9. Before It’s Too Late… Mark Levin Surge: Call Congress to Vote ‘No’ Tomorrow to Cap-and-Trade Energy Bill « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, zorro said:

    I’ve left messages with Altmire, Specter and Casey’s offices. I doubt the three stooges will lift a finger to help America, they are more concerned about consolidating their own power within the democrap power structure.

  2. #2
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, Ragspierre said:

    BIG BRO promise us skyrocketing energy costs.

    Didn’t the people who voted for him believe him…?

  3. #3
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, walterc said:

    Every day I’m more convinced that the Demoncratic party is trying to destroy this Country.

    I haven’t read the 2008 DNC platform, but the first paragraph had to be something about wanting to destroy America post haste.

    That’s the only explanation I can find for this insanity.

  4. #4
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, granite said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, walterc said:

    Every day I’m more convinced that the Demoncratic party is socialists are trying to destroy this Country.

    Yep – I came to that conclusion decades ago.

    That’s the only explanation I can find for this insanity.

    Yep again.

  5. #5
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:44 pm, Regulus said:

    The Washington Examiner weighs in: “That is a prescription for wrecking American prosperity for decades to come.”

    That’s the whole point of the endeavor: It’s not a “bug,” it’s a feature.

    The donks’ idea of “Getting everyone in the world to love us” is based on America undertaking the Mother of All Disappearing Acts: i.e., for this country to become no more remarkable, and certainly no more powerful, than any other country.

    In this way, America-haters believe that:

    1. The source of global envy and jealousy that is “American Exceptionalism” will be no more, so no one will have reason not to like us; and

    2. With our new, dramatically lower profile our enemies will somehow lose us among all the other little fish in the school, stop looking for us, and leave us alone.

    It’s a total head-in-the-sand fantasy, but Living a Lie is the ultimate shorthand for, “being a liberal.”

  6. #7
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Every day I’m more convinced that the Demoncratic party is trying to destroy this Country.

    Right.

    Up until recently, they were doing it incrementally.

    And indirectly, as when they distorted the financial markets by mandating loans to people who could not qualify for them, leading to the huge catastrophe we have seen.

    Now, however, it seems that all the safeties are off, and they are just going for broke…literally.

  7. #9
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, walterc said:

    Every day I’m more convinced that the Demoncratic party is trying to destroy this Country.

    I haven’t read the 2008 DNC platform, but the first paragraph had to be something about wanting to destroy America post haste.

    That’s the only explanation I can find for this insanity.

    The Cap and Trade Bill in question was once known as the McCain-Lieberman Bill. Does that change anything in your mind about the nature of the problem? Think President McCain.

  8. #10
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, cheapseat said:

    remember when barry was in the san fran high roller coffee clatch and said we could put up all the coal plants we wanted, but due to his cap and trade tax, they would bankrupt the electricity provider. then, within a few days he was in west virginia promising the coal miners union he wouldn’t do that. were you lying then barry, or out in san fran? i thought electicity was your power of the future? and since the brilliant engineers of the university of michigan spent 900k on an 800sf “green” solar powered trailer, and the first winter the solar couldn’t keep the batteries charged, and the electricity went out, and the pipes froze and burst, but hey solar power will drive the recovery. yeah, over $1000 per square foot and the whole thing has to be rebuilt yearly. then there is the great l.a. school district solar project, where they had to abandon the program after spending tons of our money because to operate these green schools was bankrupting the district. TRUST ME, IF SOLAR POWER CAN’T WORK IN L.A. IT CAN’T WORK ANYWHERE. LET’S INVEST HARD ASSETS INTO STUFF THAT WORKS, AND LEAVE THE PIPE DREAMS FOR PROFESSORS.

  9. #11
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, Southpaw said:

    Cap & Trade, the next great speculative bubble. The derivatives market is foaming at the mouth.

  10. #12
    On May 18th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, tarpon said:

    TAx and RAtion, small coffins on wheels for all.

    Before buying one of these CLOWN cars, better check with what the IIHS has to say about these suicide vehicles.

  11. #13
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:02 pm, 24Klady said:

    Our only consolilation will be that the increased taxes on these pipe dreams (aka: YesWeCan) will make it all but certain the very people that voted and supported this guy will be the ones most hurt by it. Higher costs of energy will result in people freezing to death in the winter and dying from heat in the summer. Congratulations.

  12. #14
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, Hangfire said:

    But, aren’t the Blue-Dog Democrats now Lavender?

  13. #15
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, Roman Con said:

    Waxman looks like the kind of guy that has his laptop seized by the authorities.

  14. #16
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:19 pm, walterc said:

    Thus the title RINO Phil.

    It was established fact that McCain/Obama two sides of the same coin. The only comfort I took in a GOP vote was a: He’s old and b: Sarah would be the one to step up.

    But you’re right, both parties are the problem.

    That’s the Tea Party message.

  15. #17
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, Savage24 said:

    I have called my representives and senators to no avail. This state has the three stooges in the house and dumb and dumber in the senate. They vote the party line on everything.This country is going to hell in a hand basket.

  16. #18
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Would anyone expect the Heritage Foundation NOT to produce some doomsday numbers about protecting the environment?

    Of course not, so why read what they produce, when they’re being funded to produce numbers that help the conservative cause in the first place.

  17. #19
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:25 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    It’s absolutely OUTRAGEOUS! Not just the information about these tax drunk liberals like Waxman and Markey that Heritage has brought to light, the FACT that there is not ONE – ZERO – NADA – NOTHING – not ONE shred of scientific EVIDENCE that supports the claim that CO2, ALL of it, has ANY measurable affect on climate let alone the puny amount that we add to it! Empirically, the correlation between CO2 and temperature in ice core samples are in REVERSE order of what was assumed by the IPCC. Global warming causes CO2!

    DUH! Fact – the oceans warm up and release CO2. Fact – The warmer soil gets the more res pirating microbes there are releasing CO2. Termites alone emit more greenhouse gases than we do!

    It is TOTAL FRAUD! The arctic is now COOLING! There is FREEZE WARNING in Maine tonight! On April 29th, Australia recorded the LOWEST temperature EVER, -13 degrees, at Charlotte Pass in the Snowy Mountains.

    Posted over at icecap.us :

    The Mount Buller resort region has already had a weekend opening for skiers, making it the earliest start to the season in history, and five weeks ahead of the usual schedule.

    Not exactly consistent with the idea of global warming huh?

    What part of global COOLING is it these nitwits simply FAIL to comprehend?

    The ocean temperatures generally lag atmospheric temperatures by a few years and now that the air has been cooling for about 8 years – the oceans are definitely on a cooling trend as well. The ocean has ONE THOUSAND TIMES the thermal mass of our atmosphere! With cooling ocean temperatures – you can take cooling to bank!

    More on ocean heat here.

    These figures reveal a robust failure on the part of the GISS model to project warming. The heat deficit shows that from 2003-2008 there was no positive radiative imbalance caused by anthropogenic forcing, despite increasing levels of CO2. Indeed, the radiative imbalance was negative, meaning the earth was losing slightly more energy than it absorbed.

    AGW is simply the biggest FRAUD of all time!

  18. #20
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Of course not, so why read what they produce, when they’re being funded to produce numbers that help the conservative cause in the first place.

    Ahh, you mean like all the government grants that have gone to scientists to prove that man made global warming exists, whereas any scientist that asks for a grant to prove it does not is turned away.

  19. #21
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Hangfire said:

    Mt. Pinatubo eruption put out more greenhouse gases and particulate in 5 minutes than humans have contributed in the last 50 years, according to the History Channel.

  20. #22
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    Would anyone expect the Heritage Foundation NOT to produce some doomsday numbers about protecting the environment?

    Of course not, so why read what they produce, when they’re being funded to produce numbers that help the conservative cause in the first place.

    So even though you cannot offer reasoned debate to refute their projections, you are saying that people should nonetheless ignore them because they support conservatism? Are FACTS now things that belong to a given political party?

    Only mentally disturbed people think that way. (and Heritage has a track record of being right… AL Gore’s global warming doomsday track record is? )

  21. #23
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:36 pm, nail49 said:

    Mt. Pinatubo eruption put out more greenhouse gases and particulate in 5 minutes than humans have contributed in the last 50 years

    And Nancy Pelosi’s last press conference outdid Mt Pinatubo by a factor of three!

  22. #24
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    HANGFIRE #19 and et all hit the target dead center. “Global Warming” is a load of C**P.
    ***
    Like President Obama’s (PBUH) advisor RHAMBO said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste!”
    ***
    And no crisis is really necessary–the democrats / liberals / socialists / marxists / communists will use anything to TAX AND DESTROY our capitalist system.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  23. #25
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, txvet2 said:

    I wish just one of these global warming enthusiasts would stick around for a little in-depth debate on the subject, but it’s always “swoop and poop”. Several days ago I posted a few question for any MMGW expert interested in taking them up. Last time I looked there were still no takers (although I haven’t looked in a few days.)

  24. #26
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:48 pm, DagneyT said:

    They must be the most cocky, smug, “we won, HAHA” congress we’ve ever seen in power. If the keep it up, maybe we can get a total rout come 2010.

    All this crap is coming at us so fast I am getting a sore dialing finger, and can’t figure out what to call about first!

  25. #28
    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    So even though you cannot offer reasoned debate to refute their projections, you are saying that people should nonetheless ignore them because they support conservatism? Are FACTS now things that belong to a given political party?

    I’m not saying they’re right or wrong. I’m just saying that they exist, and are funded, for the sole purpose of producing these numbers. So their numbers are, ipso facto, WORTHLESS.

    I think it was Ezra Klein a couple months ago who said that cap-and-trade would cost something like 1.5% of GDP, which is a ton in real numbers, but when you think of it as an insurance policy on the planet is pretty paltry. (I don’t know where his numbers came from, and they may be no more valuable than Heritage’s.)

    Only mentally disturbed people think that way. (and Heritage has a track record of being right… AL Gore’s global warming doomsday track record is? )

    Considering that Gore was predicting global warming decades ago, and the period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

  26. #29
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:10 pm, Truesoldier said:

    Considering that Gore was predicting global warming decades ago, and the period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

    I guess you forgot about this little National Geographic Article (not a very right wing publication).

    As for the whole hottest temps ever deal. I suggest you see this movie. In it the mention that the Earth was covered almost entirely in water during prehistoric times due to the lack of ice caps. Kind of hard to blame it on mankind when man was not even around then.

  27. #30
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, Ragspierre said:

    So their numbers are, ipso facto, WORTHLESS.

    Your opinion is, ipso fatso, just stupid.

    Refute the numbers, if you can. If not, shut up.

  28. #31
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:15 pm, granite said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, Ragspierre said:

    …ipso fatso, ….

    Heh!

    That’s the term my late father would use!!

  29. #32
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:18 pm, txvet2 said:

    period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

    Source? I seem to recall that the 1930’s were at least as warm, maybe warmer.

  30. #33
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, sonofdy said:

    Considering that Gore was predicting global warming decades ago, and the period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

    Not according to the ice levels world wide. They are above the average for this time of year. Yes it showed a warm time, but now it is getting colder again. Seriously RSS, don’t you question ANYTHING?????

    http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg

  31. #34
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Truesoldier said: I guess you forgot about this little National Geographic Article (not a very right wing publication).

    But the author exhibits typical greenie illogic. With virtually ALL of the heat on our planet coming from the Sun, she just can’t help herself from saying

    ..the star’s effects on climate will pale in contrast with the influence of human-made greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2).

    Gee! Human’s are more powerful than the Sun itself! I swear some of these nitwits actually think CO2, all .04% of it in the air, is some sort of heat source by itself? Maybe with enough CO2 we can break orbit and go to another galaxy – or at least hope she will.

  32. #35
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, txvet2 said:

    I’m not saying they’re right or wrong. I’m just saying that they exist, and are funded, for the sole purpose of producing these numbers. So their numbers are, ipso facto, WORTHLESS.

    Interesting that you’d take that attitude, because one could easily make the counterpoint that everything Gore says is for the sole purpose of making himself rich at our expense.

  33. #36
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:25 pm, SHoward said:

    Considering that Gore was predicting global warming decades ago, and the period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

    Actually it was the Buhddist nun that gave Gore a $30k check in 1996 that predicted Global Warming. ;)

    Seriously, RSS, Gore did nothing but latch on to the musings of a professor he had in the 1970’s, and he apparently hasn’t ever questioned it. If the professor is right, fine. But Gore isn’t capable of predicitng the next thing to come out of his own mouth.

  34. #37
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    I’m still waiting for one of these global warming “experts” to explain to us what the proper level is for CO2, and how they plan to maintain it. I’d also like to see their plan for regulating solar energy, since that is the primary source of planetary warming.

  35. #38
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, sonofdy said:

    1934 was the hottest year

  36. #39
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Source? I seem to recall that the 1930’s were at least as warm, maybe warmer.

    Are you 90?

  37. #40
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Red State Skeptic: Considering that Gore was predicting global warming decades ago, and the period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

    Did Gore predict this condition at the north pole in March of 1959?

    In fact, the greatest amount of open water in the arctic was back in the 40s! Oh, but don’t let facts like that get in the way of using a slight warm up a few years ago, one that doesn’t come anywhere near close to the 40’s, from the Catlin Arctic Survey, funded by million$ from ‘green’ investment groups (i.e. watermelons), from convincing you that the arctic ice is melting like never before and we’re all doomed…

    By the way, the hottest year on record in the last 100 was in 1934 – NOT 1998!

    And NO you may NOT use temperature records from URBANIZED monitoring stations that do NOT meet NOAA’s site specifications! Well over 60% of the GISS comes from stations that are doing nothing more than proving the urban heat island effect with temperature readings that are inflated by over 2 degrees C with the inflation occurring more and more over time.

    Compare Orland CA with Maryville CA then LOOK at the difference in their respective settings.

  38. #41
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, sonofdy said:

    RSS, your own chart shows that the globe is cooling.

    :roll:

  39. #42
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, Red State Skeptic said

    As DwD points out, this anomaly appears to be caused by the location of the measuring instruments, not changes in the global temperature. And even at that, your chart shows a distinct cooling trend over the past several years, although the production of CO2 has continued to increase as the developing world continues to, well, develop.

  40. #43
    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, sonofdy said:

    although the production of CO2 has continued to increase as the developing world continues to, well, develop.

    They plan to reverse that. The development I mean.

  41. #44
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, sonofdy said:

    They plan to reverse that. The development I mean.

    The Chinese among others may give them an argument. They’re already well to the right of the Democrats on economic policy.

  42. #45
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/

    The source of RSS’s chart. The groups funding is based on finding AGW information. This means if there is no manmade global warming they don’t get money.

    HHHMMMMMM….

  43. #46
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    Source? I seem to recall that the 1930’s were at least as warm, maybe warmer.

    Are you 90?

    Even NASA has it as a TIE (and they’re in the bag for the political leverage they add by subverting the data as James Hanson has already been caught red-handed doing several times, (while not busy advocating destruction of private property…)

  44. #47
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, sonofdy said:

    txvet2, The New Zealand business enviroment is also considered more free than the US business enviroment.

    I have my exit strategy if everything goes to crap..

  45. #48
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:04 pm, va-conservative said:

    As someone who used to live in the VA 9th district, I can say that Boucher is one of those people who have been in Washington for nearly 30 years and needs to be voted out of there. The only reason he gets elected is that fact that he is from the Abingdon-Bristol area (the 2nd most populous area in the district next to Blacksburg – the people from there won’t vote against someone from another part of the district because they don’t want to lose their influence). The union/coal people back him because he’s a Democrat, and then he gets the votes from the people registered to vote in the VA Tech area (college campus, take a guess as to what side they vote for), combine those things and he’s nearly undefeatable since the rest of the area is sparsely populated. He endorsed Obama last year before the VA primaries and the district’s Dem primary went heavily for Clinton – word on the street was that if the GOP could have found someone to run against him they’d have took the seat, but unfortunately no one wanted to try.

  46. #49
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    and the period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880,

    False

  47. #50
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    sonofdy said:

    http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/

    The source of RSS’s chart. The groups funding is based on finding AGW information. This means if there is no manmade global warming they don’t get money.

    HHHMMMMMM….

    EXACTLY!

    I think I read that 5 BILLION tax dollars have been spent on ~studying~ global warming which means thousands of hacks would be out of work if they said no problem exists. Oh but let Fred Singer get a $30K honorarium from the petroleum institute and that makes his scientific findings untrustworthy…

  48. #51
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, sonofdy said:

    txvet2, The New Zealand business enviroment is also considered more free than the US business enviroment.

    I always wanted to visit New Zealand, but the closest I ever got was an R&R in Australia.

  49. #52
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/

    The source of RSS’s chart. The groups funding is based on finding AGW information. This means if there is no manmade global warming they don’t get money.

    So by RSS’s own reasoning, anything they publish can be discounted:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Would anyone expect the Heritage Foundation NOT to produce some doomsday numbers about protecting the environment?

    Of course not, so why read what they produce, when they’re being funded to produce numbers that help the conservative cause in the first place.

    Now that we have that established, he still hasn’t produced any evidence to demonstrate actual warming over the past century.

  50. #53
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, Ragspierre said:

    We should have data showing a period of warming following volcanic events.

    We don’t.

  51. #54
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:15 pm, txvet2 said:

    In all seriousness, we had better exploit the colder regions of the planet as much as we can right now, because if the scientists who point to solar activity as the primary source of planetary warmth are right, given the current and continuing reduction in sunspot and solar wind activity, we’re in for a looong, cooold winter, and we may be heading into a period where we won’t be able to extract energy from the Arctic and near Arctic regions for maybe a couple of centuries. I say “we”, although most of us won’t be around to see it. Our grandchildren will be paying for our current stupidity.

  52. #55
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Predictions are, if the Yellowstone supervolcano erupts, the world will endure a period of cooling to make nuclear winter look positively warm.

  53. #56
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:24 pm, Ragspierre said:

    if the Yellowstone supervolcano erupts

    If that happens, we’re cooked (pun intended). I mean, that would be a culture and civilization killer.

  54. #57
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, Cathy B said:

    I just left messages on my AZ senators voice mail, letting them know my feelings on cap and trade. My husband looked over the checks we sent to our utilities over the last 2 years. Our electic bill increased over $100 from 2007 to summer of 2008. If it goes up anymore…we won’t be able to afford living here..we are fine with mortgage, it’s the utilities that are killing us!!!

  55. #58
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, txvet2 said:

    If that happens, we’re cooked (pun intended).

    Does give all new perspective to the phrase “burn in Hell”. The southern hemisphere should make out fairly well, although it’s debatable how civilized they are. The main point, of course, is that we know that sooner or later it’ll erupt, but there isn’t a single thing Obama or RSS can do about it, nor can they do anything about pretty much anything else to do with the earth’s climate (except on a micro scale, like cloud seeding).

  56. #59
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:34 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, Cathy B said:

    I just compensated by cutting back on my electricity usage. Easier for a single than for a family, I know.

  57. #60
    On May 18th, 2009 at 6:43 pm, Cathy B said:

    Oh Tex, thank you, and yes, believe me, we have been cutting back majorly..this year will tell…it’s 109 out right now, my air is set on 88. Every thing that could be plugged in is not…it still went up last year. Electrical District # 3 is an off shute of Arizona Public Service, lots of hidden taxes already…I’ll let you know. We don’t wear many clothes during the summer and thank goodness for swimming pools! LOL!

  58. #61
    On May 18th, 2009 at 7:15 pm, happy2behere said:

    Red State – go back and reread your junior research methods textbook. Did you check Heritage’s projection methods? Since they are not mentioned in this article, how do you know if they are accurate or not?

    Heritage Foundation obviously is politcal in nature, but it does not mean their numbers are incorrect. For you to assume otherwise is close-minded and dismissive.

  59. #62
    On May 18th, 2009 at 7:34 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    Cap and Trade = Higher Energy Costs = More Americans on Govt Subsidies = All Part Of The Plan

  60. #63
    On May 18th, 2009 at 7:41 pm, txvet2 said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 7:34 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    Also, huge profits for energy traders like Obama’s owner, George Soros.

  61. #64
    On May 18th, 2009 at 7:49 pm, cwbois said:

    They should call it the “Taxman Bullmalarky” Bill

  62. #65
    On May 18th, 2009 at 8:02 pm, AF Sarge (Ret) said:

    Called and e-mailed all my reps, Dicks, Cantwell and Murrey, like it’s gonna do a lot of good. At least I can say I tried! lol

    Sarge

  63. #66
    On May 18th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On May 18th, 2009 at 5:18 pm, txvet2 said:

    period since 1998 has been the hottest on record since at least 1880, I’d say his track record isn’t too bad.

    Source? I seem to recall that the 1930’s were at least as warm, maybe warmer.

    NASA quietly fixed an error in its data so that it now shows that 1934 was the warmest year on record.

    Also, the Arctic is cooling, and now has more ice than when satellite recording began in 1979.

    Of course, Al Gore and the mid-stream media haven’t mentioned those little factoids. Follow the money, follow the money.

  64. #67
    On May 18th, 2009 at 8:59 pm, TruthToBeTold said:

    The Wax museum man and the Malarkey Bill.
    We could have had nuclear power plants all over our country by now like they have in gasp France, but the evironmental nazis of the Dumocrat party are irrational afraid of radiation because their brains are incapable of rational thought. They FEEL that radiation is dangerous and therefore it IS. Don’t confuse them with the facts, their minds are made up based on their feelings.

  65. #68
    On May 18th, 2009 at 9:12 pm, Cathy B said:

    feelings…
    Nothing more then feelinggggs,
    trying to forget my…feelings of,,,

    crappppppp!

  66. #69
    On May 18th, 2009 at 9:15 pm, Cathy B said:

    It’s 110 at 6:13 pm in Maricopa AZ

    my house still cools off after 88 degrees.

  67. #70
    On May 19th, 2009 at 12:11 am, Zaz said:

    Do we really want to cool down the planet? Check out an article from Geophysicist David Deming on the American Thinker Site.
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/the_coming_ice_age.html
    Oh that’s right the science is settled on Global Warming…NOT!!!! What a bunch of idots in Washington!!

  68. #71
    On May 19th, 2009 at 12:50 am, happy2behere said:

    Thanks Fru, I was looking for that link.

    I was also looking for a quote I thought I saw on Wikipedia recently from James Hansen, head of GISS at NASA, who claimed that October 2008 was one of the hottest on record and it turned out that it was one of the coolest. Funny, it doesn’t seem to be there…

  69. #72
    On May 19th, 2009 at 4:15 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Freeze warnings were issued for all over the northeast down into West Virginia last night. We haven’t seen record lows like this since the 80’s.

    Global warming my A**!

  70. #73
    On May 19th, 2009 at 5:54 am, plymouthacclaim said:

    “Our nation is at a crossroads,” declared Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the committee’s chairman “We can continue to look the other way and leave these problems to our children, or we can adopt a new energy fiscal policy for America.”

    fixed it (the way it should be)

  71. #76
    On May 19th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Every day I’m more convinced that the Demoncratic party is trying to destroy this Country.

    Dude, that’s because they are.

    It has nothing to do with protecting the environment or “equality” – it has everything to do with them hating the country that made them so wealthy and seeking to destroy it.

    While keeping their freedoms and wealth intact, of course.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Van Jones show comes to Columbia U.

February 9, 2010 12:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

About that “Green Police” Super Bowl ad

February 8, 2010 01:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

145 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Last laugh.

Look who’s opposing EPA’s war on carbon now

February 5, 2010 01:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

74 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

ClimateGate update: Mann handled

February 3, 2010 12:32 PM by Michelle Malkin

28 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

More on those job-destroying energy taxes

February 3, 2010 10:39 AM by Michelle Malkin

26 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Illinois Senate primary: Lame and Lamer

February 2, 2010 11:12 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Obama budget exposes nuclear lie

February 1, 2010 10:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

147 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Conservatives: Beware of McCain Regression Syndrome

January 22, 2010 09:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

331 Comments | 40 Trackbacks


Categories: Enviro-nitwits, Tea Party



Mudville Gazette

» New Standards in Journalism
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook