Dueling banjos in Washington; Updated

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 21, 2009 08:50 AM

Scroll for updates…

It’s the Obama-Cheney showdown this morning. I, for one, am gratified to see this White House forced to put national security on the front burner. If not for the forceful public defenses by Vice President Cheney of the aggressive, proactive measures the last administration took to keep us safe, the current commander-in-chief would be happily gabbling about solar panels and weatherization subsidies or somesuch.

National security is and always will be the Democrats’ soft spot. And they know it.

Which is why Team Obama scrambled to preempt Cheney’s AEI speech.

Which is why the same Senate Democrats who cheered so lustily when Obama declared his Gitmo closure date turned around and denied him the funds to implement it.

Which is why Obama is embracing the very same principles of preventive detention that the Left went bananas over for the past eight years.

And which is why you woke up this morning to news of one of countless terror busts whose results were, ahem, inherited by the Obama administration.

The men and women who worked tirelessly the past eight years to prevent and disrupt jihadist plots at home and abroad aren’t the ones who’ve “lost their way.”

It’s the unreality-grounded civil rights absolutists, grievance-mongers, and 9/10 juveniles who have been and remain, in Andrew McCarthy’s apt description, willfully blind.

***

Related thoughts from Meghan Clyne in the NYPost on national security and the SCOTUS wars:

A poll released this week shows Democrats have closed the gap with Republicans on national security. There are few media circuses like Supreme Court hearings — and if the GOP seizes the spotlight to focus attention on some of the left’s more bizarre and dangerous legal theories on the War on Terror, it can only work to its advantage.

After all, by placing terrorism center stage, they might just accomplish one more thing: reminding Washington, and the American people, that we are still at war. With a Democratic supermajority in the Senate, it’s unlikely that Republicans will be able to block Obama’s nominee, no matter how unappealing. Yet if they can use the Souter vacancy to show that the War on Terror isn’t just about preening lawyers, but a real battle fought by real Americans whom a lot of judges are endangering . . . well, there are worse things to get out of a confirmation hearing.

***

Update: Here is the text of Cheney’s speech.

Cliff Notes’ version of Obama’s speech: I blame Bush (but, uh, I will follow his “lost way” on preventive detention. Just in a kinder, gentler, more, uh, moral way).

Update: I second Kathy Shaidle on Dick Cheney’s speech:

“Cheney’s speech was the best speech of the Bush administration. Too bad it was months/years late.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On May 21st, 2009 at 8:56 am, flmom said:

    Dick Cheney is showing the leadership that the Republicans are sadly lacking. He has now put the Obama administration on defense mode, Republicans should take note. Though, not holding my breath.

  2. #2
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:07 am, bansharia said:

    has Ed left hotair? does anyone know?
    thank you in advance

  3. #3
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:08 am, lgm said:

    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s. After “weeks rather than months” and “greeted as liberators” and “operational ties between Al Qaeda and Saddam” and “you wouldn’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud” (sorry, that’s Rice), you would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

  4. #4
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:09 am, tiredofit08 said:

    kinda off topic but you all should enjoy this little video…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxDwBYjL3Fc

  5. #5
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:11 am, Silkyinfamous said:

    Vice President Cheney of the aggressive, proactive measures the last administration took to keep us safe, the current commander-in-chief would be happily gabbling about solar panels and weatherization subsidies or somesuch.

    The aggressive illegal measures?

    And happily gabbling about energy of the future -now- and less reliance on the middle east and less involved in their lives. I think that’s a good idea.

  6. #6
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:13 am, txvet2 said:

    National security is and always will be the Democrats’ soft spot. And they know it.

    Personally, I think their soft spot is everything between their ears.

  7. #7
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:15 am, flmom said:

    lgm said:

    Being popular usually entails being all things to all people, which usually means you stand for nothing.

  8. #8
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:17 am, right4life said:

    n May 21st, 2009 at 9:08 am, lgm said:
    “operational ties between Al Qaeda and Saddam”

    are you calling the first black president, and the most moral man in america, Bill Clinton, a LIAR???

    you know he bombed the sudan because of those operational links.

  9. #9
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:18 am, txvet2 said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:11 am, Silkyinfamous said:

    The aggressive illegal measures?

    Only to the lunatic fringe – like you and lgm.

  10. #10
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:20 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    And happily gabbling about energy of the future -now- and less reliance on the middle east and less involved in their lives. I think that’s a good idea.

    Drill here, drill now!

  11. #11
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:23 am, right4life said:

    oh and of course these 4 guys just arrested in a terrorist plot are VICTIMS of ameriKKKan imperialism. they should be set up in a fashionable NY pad, and given all the weapons they want, just to prove that we mean then no harm.

    and then they, and all of the islamic world, will understand that we care, and are their friends!

  12. #12
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:30 am, BuckeyeSam said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:07 am, bansharia said:
    has Ed left hotair? does anyone know?
    thank you in advance

    I answered in another thread: he’s on vacation this week, maybe longer. Just keep checking.

  13. #13
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:32 am, John Deaux said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:08 am, lgm said:
    … Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s.

    The parent who gives their children anything they want and never punishes them is more popular with the kids than the parent who teaches the value of a dollar and disciplines, but which is the better parent?

  14. #14
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:35 am, Savage24 said:

    The sad thing is, that the main stream media will drown out Dick Cheney’s speech with the Obama lies . Even when he is defending the country, I don’t believe him. In fact I don’t believe anything he says.

  15. #15
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:35 am, BuckeyeSam said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:08 am, lgm said:
    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s.

    Who cares about popularity-contest ratings? Drop the personality and run the poll of Obama’s stand against Cheney’s stand, and the country sides two-to-one with Cheney.

    We want Cheney on that wall; we need him on that wall!

  16. #16
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:57 am, Flyoverman said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:08 am, lgm said:

    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s. After “weeks rather than months” and “greeted as liberators” and “operational ties between Al Qaeda and Saddam” and “you wouldn’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud” (sorry, that’s Rice), you would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

    LGM, I would think tha today of all days you would reconsider your position on terror. Four terrorists who have plotted to blowup a Jewish Synogouge in NYC, who were discovered and infiltrated long before Obama appeared get busted.

    LGM, you should be sending a thank you note to President Bush and VP Cheney today. My first thought this morning was I wonder if that’s where LGM worships?

    LGM, Bush and Cheney NEVER have cared about favorability polls. They are PATRIOTS and public servants who kept their oath to do their utmost to keep you and me safe.

    How you can sit literally in a city that is Ground Zero and have the attitudes you have is a total mystery to me.

  17. #17
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:58 am, lgm said:

    BuckeyeSam said (#15):

    Who cares about popularity-contest ratings?

    How about elections? The American people decide what the country does. They elected Bush and Cheney and now see that was a mistake. Maybe Obama will turn out to be a mistake — we’ll see. Maybe he’ll remain popular as Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan have.

  18. #18
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:00 am, HomeoftheBrave said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:35 am, BuckeyeSam said:
    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:08 am, lgm said:
    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s.
    Who cares about popularity-contest ratings? Drop the personality and run the poll of Obama’s stand against Cheney’s stand, and the country sides two-to-one with Cheney.

    We want Cheney on that wall; we need him on that wall!

    lgm – troll – You can’t handle the truth! he he…. twit

  19. #19
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:03 am, Ragspierre said:

    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s.

    Yeah, but Al Capone was popular, too. Cheney has been subjected to a media character assassination the like of which this nation has never seen. The vast majority of it was a lie. Obama is a new BLACK president, which artificially keeps his popularity numbers high.

    After [years of Leftist] ranting, raving and frothing] lgm would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

    Funny how so many Americans can see truth through lies.

    Like the one about us not being the victim of another attack on our soil for the last seven, nearly eight years…

  20. #20
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:07 am, Ragspierre said:

    They elected Bush and Cheney and now see that was a mistake.

    Umm…

    Bush wasn’t running against THE ONE. That was McAnus, the weakest possible choice of the field. And the election was buggered by the MSM, who openingly and fawningly tanked for THE ONE.

    Maybe Obama will turn out to be a mistake — we’ll see.

    We already have seen. HUGE mistake, based on HUGE lies.

    Maybe he’ll remain popular as Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan have.

    Bill who…?

  21. #21
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:07 am, nlebou said:

    Obama has already proved to be a mistake.

  22. #22
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:08 am, right4life said:

    I thought Obama was going to close gitmo and release those poor victims of ameriKKKan racism and imperialism??

    and I thought he was going to do away with EVIL military tribunals?

    and I thought he was going to release those photos that show just how evil ameriKKKa is!!

    and he’s AIR RAIDING innocent civilians in afghanistan!!!

    guess he’s just another WAR CRIMINAL like BOOOOSSSSSHHHHHH

  23. #23
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:08 am, nlebou said:

    ah….you beat me Ragspierre

  24. #24
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:09 am, right4life said:

    That was McAnus

    thats a good one!

  25. #25
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:13 am, nlebou said:

    How about elections? The American ACORN people decide what the country does.

  26. #26
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:17 am, fluffy said:

    How about elections? The American people decide what the country does. They elected Bush and Cheney and now see that was a mistake.

    Perhaps we will see it as a mistake to have made such a 180.

    Remember, Cheney is an eligible candidate for 2012.

  27. #27
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:20 am, frontierguy said:

    you would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

    But yet, there is Obama, rushing to get out there to talk about national security on the same day Cheney is. For a dead party with a bunch of nobodies that no one listens to, the left sure is still making a big deal out of them. If my numbers were so up there I think I would be secure enough to ignore someone like Cheney talking, but that is just me.

  28. #28
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:22 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    LGM is living safe in NYC thanks to the way President Bush, Vice President Dick Chaney, and others came up with the ways to “listen in” to the terrorists and hit them as hard as was possible.
    ***
    If President Obama (PBUH) and his minions in the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of government get their ways LGM will end up with some of these TERRORISTS (not “misunderstood religous community organizers”)as neighbors.
    ***
    I would be afraid to live in NYC or Washington DC after the democrats / liberals / socialists / marxists /communists implement their new U.S.S.A. policies.
    ***
    The good news is that only 10 percent of the Muslims in the world have accepted the Jihadi tactics–that the only good non-Muslim is a dead non-Muslim.
    ***
    The bad news is that 10 percent of 1,000 million Muslims is 100 million people that want us dead. Wake up and smell the cordite. The only thing that has changed since 9/11/2001 is our new government’s desire to stop engaging and hunting down the enemy.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  29. #29
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:23 am, tarpon said:

    Don’t bring a teleprompter to a gun fight.

  30. #30
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:31 am, Ragspierre said:

    Don’t bring a teleprompter to a gun fight.

    EXCELLENT…!!!!

    Off prompter, Cheney can form a coherent sentence, with nary an “UH, AH, UM…”

    THE ONE can’t.

  31. #31
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:44 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Just shows you how completely irrelevant the elected members of the GOP have become that the Cheney, a retired VP, has to be the one to defend policy. Time for the GOP to fold up shop and go home and fine tune their “electability theory” on waging losing campaigns. Since they don’t stand for anything, they don’t have to fight for anything. I recommend that their symbol should be blank flag. They can spend their time trying to explain that it is a BLANK flag, not a white flag.

  32. #32
    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:59 am, Boomer said:

    Morning all long time no post! I have been doing a lot of overtime for the past 10 weeks standing up a new Fighter Squadron at our Wing and have been too brain dead to offer anything useful on this site other than to keep up with the latest outrage from “dear leader” or his minions. I keep jumping between FOX buisness new watching the tax cheat tank the market and watching what Chenney has to say about national security and “dear leader’s” arrogance and stupidity on the subject. When the hell will “dear leader” quit flapping his gums and let someone that understands how to protect Americans the opportunity to speak? Time to get myself into town to get my driver’s license renewed and then back to work. Stay safe and hoping to be able to get back in the grove over the long weekend.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  33. #33
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:03 am, granite said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:44 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Just shows you how completely irrelevant the…GOP have become….

    Time for the GOP to fold up shop and go home and fine tune their “electability theory” on waging losing campaigns. Since they don’t stand for anything, they don’t have to fight for anything.

    Sad, but true.

    Anyone else getting Michael Steele’s “Weekly Trunk” emails?
    Just my opinion, but what a lame title, sort of the type socialists/elitists might come up with.
    Did the GOP get the idea for the “Trunk” from The New Yorker, or from a Woody Allen movie?
    (Apologies to fans of the last two.)

  34. #34
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:04 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    zero continues to prove what a true failure and mistake he truly is. he lacks any leadership qualities. the sheep may be impressed, but then again, that’s why sheep need sheep dogs, to tell them what they need to do.

  35. #35
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:08 am, spaceycakes said:

    The point is not to look backward. Now and for years to come, a lot rides on our President’s understanding of the security policies that preceded him. And whatever choices he makes concerning the defense of this country, those choices should not be based on slogans and campaign rhetoric, but on a truthful telling of history.

    Cheney. ROX!

  36. #36
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:15 am, tonyr951 said:

    He has a penchant for using 10 words when 1 would suffice.

  37. #37
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:16 am, BuckeyeSam said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:58 am, lgm said:

    Spare me. He got the votes of the hardcore left and then enough of the middle who thought it was a time to vote for a cool black guy.

    Walter Williams said Obama would set blacks back for decade, and Williams is right.

  38. #38
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:18 am, MtsEdge said:

    lgm: …you would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

    With all the trashing from the media over the last 8 years, that’s certainly what you hope.

    lgm, can you explain why Obama is following Cheney’s lead on national security?

  39. #39
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:20 am, Ragspierre said:

    I just had a flash of insight…

    Like ABORTION

    Water-boarding should be SAFE, LEGAL, AND RARE….!!!!!

  40. #40
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:20 am, BuckeyeSam said:

    Obama says we’re not a Christian nation overseas, yet he invokes God’s name and blessings as he closes his speech.

    Which is it, O?

  41. #41
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:25 am, Flyoverman said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:20 am, Ragspierre said:

    I just had a flash of insight…

    Like ABORTION…

    Water-boarding should be SAFE, LEGAL, AND RARE….!!!!!

    This is the left’s mindset. Pouring water in the mouth of a person to simulate drowning is torture.

    However, if an attempt to abort a baby fails and the child is born alive, it is not torture to deny the infant medical care; leaving it to cry and gasp for air without showing any mercy whatsoever until it dies.

  42. #42
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:30 am, spaceycakes said:

    Rags & Flyoverman–LOL.

    Did you both read Ann Coulter’s newest column?

    they won’t even call abortion by its name, preferring to use a string of constantly changing euphemisms, such as “reproductive health” and “choice.”

    It would be as if gun owners refused to use the word “gun” and the NRA’s motto were, “Let’s all work together to keep hunting safe, legal and rare.”

  43. #43
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:31 am, rotarymunkey said:

    Where does someone come off listing Cheney as a “retired VP”? Did he ever say he was retiring from politics? Dick Cheney kept his mouth shut and his head down as VP because that’s what the job required him to do (mostly). I’m sure he now sees his current position as simply “unemployed”, and as such, he’s allowed to do whatever he wants and say whatever he wants, because that’s what we do here in America.

    Think if you’d been the VP of a major company, for example, and you’d just been ousted by the members of the board. The new President of the company strolls in and bashes everything you just did, while turning around in secret and continuing YOUR SAME POLICIES… Wouldn’t you want to have a soapbox to stand on?

    Cheney’s only pointing out that the new Emperor is naked… in the immortal words of Pete Townsend and the Who; “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”!

    BTW-with all of the actual jobs that Cheney’s held, I’ll take HIS version of GOP principles any day of the week over the sitting members of Congress and the so-called leaders of the GOP!

  44. #44
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:33 am, Ragspierre said:

    There is NO evidence than anyone water-boarded his died, or been permanently damaged.

    On the other hand, every human being subjected to abortion (with a very few exceptions) has been killed, and the mother OFTEN permanently DAMAGED, as well.

    The more I consider that THE ONE has taken whole classes of interrogation off the table, the more I realize how irresponsible he is, and how MUCH MORE DANGEROUS our world has become.

  45. #45
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:35 am, rotarymunkey said:

    The GOP have become irrelevant because the GOP leadership and elected officials have marginalized their GOP positions… NOT because there’s not a significant portion of this country which still believes in small government, low taxes, and personal freedom.

    Obama got elected on a fluke… people wanted “new” because they were constantly told by the MSM that the “old was bad”. By the time 2010 arrives, it’ll be a new ballgame, folks!

  46. #46
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:48 am, Ragspierre said:

    “Half-measures leave you HALF EXPOSED”
    Dick Cheney.

    With weapons of mass destruction including airliners crammed with passengers…

    happily employed by people who want to kill our culture and civilization

    ANY exposure is too freaking much.

  47. #47
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:51 am, Ragspierre said:

    If the recidivism rate of GITMO detainees is 14%…

    that kills the “recruitment” bullspit the LEFTISTS keep chanting.

  48. #48
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:53 am, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, the GOP erroneously chose the “Trunk” in lieu of the “Sphincter” which would have been more appropiate, but harder to spell. This is where their (skat/message) emminates. Cutsie things like this as well as a lack of conservative voice are why you can color me and my $ gohn.

  49. #49
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:55 am, MtsEdge said:

    Trunk = Junk

  50. #50
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:57 am, Southpaw said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 10:17 am, fluffy said:
    Remember, Cheney is an eligible candidate for 2012.

    Cheney/Palin ’12

    Michelle Malkin for Secretary of State.

  51. #51
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:58 am, granite said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:53 am, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, the GOP erroneously chose the “Trunk” in lieu of the “Sphincter” which would have been more appropiate, but harder to spell.

    LMAO!
    Glad I wasn’t drinking my coffee when I saw that!
    Good one! Exceptional!!
    Kudos!

  52. #52
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:59 am, b-cat said:

    Errah, the GOP erroneously chose the “Trunk” in lieu of the “Sphincter” which would have been more appropiate, but harder to spell.

    And hard to distinguish from Specter.

  53. #53
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:59 am, DBNinKY said:

    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s.

    So what? Effective, instrumental leaders like VP Cheney are seldom seen as popular while in office, or shortly thereafter; even Churchill lost power after saving Britain from Nazis invasion.

    Cheney was and is concerned with making the right decisions to keep this country safe, despite the polls, which is what instrumental leadership is all about – not wetting a finger and holding it in the air to determine which way the political winds are blowing (that’s weakness), and he will be seen as a great VP.

    After “weeks rather than months” and “greeted as liberators” and “operational ties between Al Qaeda and Saddam” and “you wouldn’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud” (sorry, that’s Rice), you would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

    Oh really? What about the “tax cut for 95% of all Americans” or “Gitmo will close upon my inauguration” or “out of Iraq in sixteen months” or “most transparent administration” and the host of Obama’s other distractions-as-promises that will never come to realization? Obama is a one termer.

  54. #54
    On May 21st, 2009 at 11:59 am, MtsEdge said:

    Cheney/Palin ‘12

    LOVE IT!!!

  55. #55
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:02 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Spector = Sphincter

  56. #56
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:04 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah in my alternate universe a Headline in Steele’s rag would have read “Spector has left the Sphincter!”

  57. #57
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:08 pm, POTUS said:

    That’s a powerful speech. Can’t wait to see the response by the “O” on releasing the intelligence uncovered during the EIT phase.

  58. #58
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:15 pm, moonshot said:

    They’re both liars. Its not a good feeling to believe in no one anymore.

    No one.

  59. #59
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:17 pm, spaceycakes said:

    They’re both liars.

    Half right.

  60. #60
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:21 pm, sharprightturn said:

    NO contest on this…Professor Cheney skewered the pre-schoolers in the Obama administration!

    Also….considering Obama’s defensiveness, narcissism, and arrogance:

    My mom watched Obama’s full speech this morning and she counted the words “I” or “my” was spoken 143 times in his speech…and she herself admitted she probably missed a few!

    I just counted the words “I” and “me” in Cheney’s speech…. just over 30 times were those words used!

  61. #61
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:22 pm, DBNinKY said:

    VP Cheney:

    Throughout the 90s, America had responded to these attacks, if at all, on an ad hoc basis. The first attack on the World Trade Center was treated as a law enforcement problem, with everything handled after the fact – crime scene, arrests, indictments, convictions, prison sentences, case closed.

    That’s how it seemed from a law enforcement perspective, at least – but for the terrorists the case was not closed. For them, it was another offensive strike in their ongoing war against the United States. And it turned their minds to even harder strikes with higher casualties. Nine-eleven made necessary a shift of policy, aimed at a clear strategic threat – what the Congress called “an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.” From that moment forward, instead of merely preparing to round up the suspects and count up the victims after the next attack, we were determined to prevent attacks in the first place.

    The perfect speech – the highlighted part exactly summarizes the differences in strategy and approach, between the two parties in caring for this nation’s security – VP Cheney is a magnificent leader and effective speaker!

  62. #62
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:24 pm, sharprightturn said:

    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s.

    Unfortunately, it was a popularity contest and not substance that put Obama in office….

    Obama is still popular but many polls show much of his policy initiatives are NOT!

    The time is over to keep gauging the leadership of this country by popularity….

  63. #63
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I might add that people who consistently distort the truth in this way are in no position to lecture anyone about “values.” Intelligence officers of the United States were not trying to rough up some terrorists simply to avenge the dead of 9/11. We know the difference in this country between justice and vengeance. Intelligence officers were not trying to get terrorists to confess to past killings; they were trying to prevent future killings. From the beginning of the program, there was only one focused and all-important purpose. We sought, and we in fact obtained, specific information on terrorist plans.

    Those are the basic facts on enhanced interrogations. And to call this a program of torture is to libel the dedicated professionals who have saved American lives, and to cast terrorists and murderers as innocent victims. What’s more, to completely rule out enhanced interrogation methods in the future is unwise in the extreme. It is recklessness cloaked in righteousness, and would make the American people less safe. Dick Cheney

    Truth.

  64. #64
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:26 pm, sbw999 said:

    There isnt a dem since JFK that has had the vaguest GD clue as to how to defend our nation. While pantywaist liberals whine and cry about the rights of people that want to butcher us, it has been the policies of the Bush administration that have decimated Al Queda and kept us safe for the past 8 years.

    The consequence of liberals undoing all of those policies will of course be another attack. And what will sniveling liberal a**holes say then???

    PS: PLEASE, don’t feed the attention starved little trolls on this board, who spew lib talking points, poll results and mantras (as opposed to relevant facts). We know who they are.

  65. #65
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:31 pm, spaceycakes said:

    sbw999 said:We know who they are.

    oh yea; the one that never answers any question put to it…

  66. #66
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:31 pm, love2rumba said:

    “Cheney’s speech was the best speech of the Bush administration. Too bad it was months/years late.”

    That is because Dick Cheney is now allowed by convention to say what really should have been said.

    Dick Cheney should have been President- not the playboy from Texas we ended up with who right now is more concerned with his stupid memoirs than fighting the good fight.

    If his views on fiscal conservatism before he was yoked to GW Bush are favorable, he should be the Repubs standard-bearer, with Sarah Palin as VP.

    “Cheney and the Lady, 2012″(?)

  67. #67
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:31 pm, JusDreamin said:

    lgm said:
    Maybe Obama will turn out to be a mistake

    lol, yeah, maybe lgm. Lets just hope he doesnt trash the place before he leaves.

    I read the text of Cheney’s speech. Excellent. Really hit on the problems with tactics of the new administration. Gotta hand it to him, he’s one tough bird, and refuses to be trashed without a fight, in this case, simply pointing out the facts.

  68. #68
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:33 pm, love2rumba said:

    How about elections? The American people decide what the country does. They elected Bush and Cheney and now see that was a mistake. Maybe Obama will turn out to be a mistake — we’ll see. Maybe he’ll remain popular as Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan have.

    Perhaps your confidence in The One is beginning to wane, LGM?

  69. #69
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:33 pm, Gorebot said:

    I watched every second of Cheney’s speech; he is a national hero, period.

    That he is being desecrated in the strident/hysterical/apoplectically-apologist/defeatist left-wing media makes me so mad I find myself almost wishing for another 9/11 — just so these sub-humans can get the reminder they so desperately need that…

    … Cheney is (and was) right!!!!!

  70. #70
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:35 pm, sbw999 said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:31 pm, love2rumba said:

    Dick Cheney should have been President- not the playboy from Texas we ended up with who right now is more concerned with his stupid memoirs than fighting the good fight.

    I couldn’t agree more.

  71. #71
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:36 pm, T-Bone said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 9:11 am, Silkyinfamous said:
    The aggressive illegal measures?

    Ah and theres the rub. The measures were LEGAL. Until you learn to deal with the truth, you will have difficulty in life making intelligent decisions. LGM is in the same boat. MS falsehoods are clouding your judgement.

  72. #72
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:38 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Dick Cheney should have been President- not the playboy from Texas we ended up with who right now is more concerned with his stupid memoirs than fighting the good fight.

    I voted for this LOTE, and although I am grateful to him for some things, the reason he was an LOTE became so very apparent during the last 2 years of his admin., when he was simply unable to resist the liberal majority in Congress (Dems and Repubs, BTW).

    He as Pres w/Cheney as VP is the converse to Reagan picking his dad as VP. Sadly, his legacy is tarnished and our country’s future is in a precarious state because of his last 2 years, which allowed this nation to slip into the hands of an unrepentant Marxist.

  73. #73
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Misscheryl said:

    9:08 am, lgm said:
    Cheney’s macho &^%$# might make you happy, but Obama’s favorable rating is three times Cheney’s. After “weeks rather than months” and “greeted as liberators” and “operational ties between Al Qaeda and Saddam” and “you wouldn’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud” (sorry, that’s Rice), you would think Cheney’s credibility rating would be zero.

    FYI – Cheney’s approval rating is rising by the day lgm. Your post sounds desperate. I haven’t been on here much, but to compare your current diatribes with past ones, I’d say you sound a bit nervous – and honestly, you should be.

  74. #74
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:43 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Bush was a FAR from optimal President, BUT…

    as Milton Friedman said, “You have to compare something with something”.

    Bush was the right choice as between Gore and Kerry.

    Just imagine where we would be now…

  75. #75
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:46 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    The honorable and honest Vice President Dick Cheney laid out why President Bush’s administration had to take the actions they did to protect the U.S.A. against further 9/11/2001 attacks.
    ***
    President Obama (PBUH) talked about looking forward and moving on–in between bashing President Bush’s administration and blaming him for all our problems.
    ***
    V.P. Chaney called out the “Messiah” on torture–limited prisoner abuse–waterboarding–was used on 3 terrorists with real knowledge of impending attacks and paid off bigtime in saving American lives. President Obama would have given up these lives for his “high moral principles”.
    ***
    The Italian Red Brigade terrorists kidnapped and murdered Prime Minister Aldo Morrow. Italian special police caught one of the terrorists that had knowledge on where a kidnap victim was being held by the terrorists.
    ***
    He didn’t want to talk. They sat him on a vise in the police garage and tightened it up on his “private parts”. A few minutes later he outed his compadres. All the Red Brigade members were caught and imprisoned, and the victim set free.
    ***
    Who do you want protecting you–and what approaches do you want used on those with knowledge that can save your life?
    ***
    I vote for the Dick Cheney limited abuse approach.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  76. #76
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:51 pm, Average Joe said:

    Leadership is not a popularity contest. Cheney gets it, believe Bush did too. I would venture a guess that neither one gave their poll numbers much thought over the course of their tenure. So bringing up poll numbers is a tactic of the clueless.

  77. #77
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:52 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Obamageddon just got Bitch Slapped by Cheney! ROTFLMAO!

  78. #78
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:56 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Obama just got B(&)(*_) Slapped by Cheney

  79. #79
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:56 pm, Ragspierre said:

    And what a great moment in our history…

    the two camps of American ideology so well displayed for all to see.

    Thanks, Mr. Cheney…

    Again.

  80. #80
    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:58 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Communist News Network just reported a poll showing that Cheney’s popularity is on the rise.

    (giggle)

  81. #81
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:03 pm, rplatt said:

    You simply cannot equate Cheney’s superb intellect and rational thought progression with Obama and his mindless teleprompter babble.

  82. #82
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:03 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Interesting that Obama gave his speech in a room that houses the Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights.

    I would bet you a crsip $100 bill that other than in college when he had to for an assignment, Obama has never read voluntarily any of those documents.

    I am sure he views them as impediments to his agenda.

  83. #83
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:05 pm, Flyoverman said:

    We need a T-shirt or poster of VP Cheney with this inscription.

    Dick Cheney

    An American Patriot

    “Still in the Fight”

  84. #84
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:07 pm, 24Klady said:

    I have never been more proud of V.P. Dick Cheney. Without emotion or hysteria he completely explained why things were done and also why we must keep vigilant today. Mr. Cheney told us why, better than anyone.

    Pres. Obama cannot ever take blame for his actions. It’s always someone else’s fault. That’s not a very comforting trait to those of us depending on him keeping the country safe. I have far more reservations after watching the spectacle today than I had before. The wagging finger, the blaming of actions taken over the incident that killed 3000 in NY and thousands of our soldiers on the battlefield. He does not get it and our enemies now know he’ll not lift a finger to protect us unless he can claim innocence.

  85. #85
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:11 pm, xler8bmw said:

    HHHHMMMM one would think that Obamageddon would know his Sec of Defense’s name right?

    He called him William Gates LMAO!

  86. #86
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:12 pm, bansharia said:

    BuckeyeSam

  87. #87
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:12 pm, bansharia said:

    BuckeyeSam

  88. #88
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:12 pm, bansharia said:

    what the heck
    THANK YOU lets see if that works

  89. #89
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:20 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “Cheney’s speech was the best speech of the Bush administration. Too bad it was months/years late.”

    He’s often the only adult in the room.

  90. #90
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:22 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 12:43 pm, Ragspierre said: Bush was a FAR from optimal President, BUT…

    as Milton Friedman said, “You have to compare something with something”.

    Bush was the right choice as between Gore and Kerry.

    Just imagine where we would be now…

    True. That’s one reason why I voted for him. However, the downhill slide of his presidency illustrates why voting for an LOTE produces less than optimum results, and can have a devastating long-term effect (re Obama taking the helm).

  91. #91
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:22 pm, RetFireman said:

    You know, the thing with the New York Terror bust yesterday is more than just proof the Bush Admin was doing more about protecting us than Der Fuhrer.

    Yesterday proved just how much we need Git-Mo, and how horrible of an idea it is to place these jihadist ba**ards into the American prison system.

    It is one thing when you have all these terrorists that have been taken off the field of battle in one location, one prison in a foreign country, albeit on an American base, where all they have to talk to is themselves.

    It is another thing entirely when you place these same people, filled with hatred and plans of destroying America, killing Americans and laying waste to everything they deem non-Islamic into the general population of a Super-Max prison and get them talking to those who WILL get out at some point…those who have made “jailhouse conversions” to Islam and who already have a vendetta against this nation and those who live here.

    Three of those captured yesterday were “jailhouse converts”. They came up with their plot all on their own. What does the Obama Admin and the rest of the Liberal jack-a**es think is going to happen once they get the fine, upstanding gentlemen housed currently in Git-Mo around these same people in an American prison?

    No, the danger is not in these Club Git-Mo rejects getting out. It is in the damage they can do to those in prison who WILL get out and who are legally allowed to remain in this country and who cannot be sent elsewhere.

    And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the prime example of how Liberals, and more to the point, the Obama Administration DOES NOT THINK and they DO NOT have the safety and security of this nation and her people in mind or in their hearts in anything they do.

    Ad don’t give me the crap about how they will be kept away from others, or in solitary or anything like that. IF that were the case, then there would be no reason to bring them here in the first place. They won’t allow that to happen, for all the idiotic Liberal peace-nics will be all up in arms about discrimination and other nonsense. Look at what they do now.

  92. #92
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:23 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Fifty-eight percent (58%) believe the Obama administration’s recent release of CIA memos about the harsh interrogation methods used on terrorism suspects endangers the national security of the United States. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 28% believe the release of the memos helps America’s image abroad.
    Rasmussen

    Also, 64% of Americans say that the balance between individual rights and national security is either about right, or is weighted toward individual rights too much.

  93. #93
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:24 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Leadership is not a popularity contest.

    Unless you’re still in jr. high.

  94. #94
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Mister P said:

    Obama is the first Anti-American President.

  95. #95
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:25 pm, rambler said:

    Being popular is no replacement for leadership; speaking well is not a replacement for the truth; being cool is not a replacement for competence; pandering to wackos will not keep us safe!

  96. #96
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    From that moment forward, instead of merely preparing to round up the suspects and count up the victims after the next attack, we were determined to prevent attacks in the first place.

    Can you ever in your wildest imagination think of Obama saying that – or even “getting it”?

  97. #97
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:28 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:22 pm, RetFireman said:

    Well said. I’m still trying to figure out what’s wrong with Gitmo in the first place.

  98. #98
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:29 pm, tbear44 said:

    lgm sez:

    Maybe Obama will turn out to be a mistake

    No maybe about it lgm. He is.

  99. #99
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:40 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    “…recklessness cloaked in righteousness…”

    My favorite phrase!
    Pretty much sums up the Leftards.

  100. #100
    On May 21st, 2009 at 1:48 pm, Ragspierre said:

    If America is hit again…

    No Obama grandiloquence will avail.

    Nothing on his teleprompter will suffice.

    Americans will be telling him and his cohort…

    “Tell it to the pitchfork…!!!”

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs

February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers

50 Comments

Stealth altruism

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

Latest Addition to the Super Bowl Counterterrorism Squad: Hot Dog Vendors

February 3, 2012 07:53 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

Hope for the best, plan for the wurst

Hiring Spree in NYC

February 1, 2012 02:47 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants

January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama and Jan Brewer Have Words on Airport Tarmac; Update: Brewer Book Sales Skyrocket

January 25, 2012 09:54 PM by Doug Powers

165 Comments

Book-Critic-in-Chief takes issue


Categories: Barack Obama,Dick Cheney,Gitmo,Homeland Security

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook