Too many folks haven’t yet grasped the concept that there is really only one political party in the USA with two “brands”; until people start en masse excercising their write-in votes nothing will improve.

My analysis:
500 years ago certain highly moneyed interests in Europe saw the newly (re)discovered Western Hemisphere as a great investment opportunity.

Spain, Portugal and France saw gold mines, furs and other natural resources while England saw a place to offload their surplus population in addition to a great source of prime wood for the Royal Navy.

500 years later I see the Banksters of Europe and their shills here in the Western Hemisphere attempting to take back their investments.

We certainly do live in interesting times!

this is brilliance….?

In Statist circles…it is called passing…

I’ve known quite a few Statists who were endowed with excellent minds.

They CHOOSE to be idiots.

A very dark sin, IMNHO.

Opposing Koh is not .. a claim that he is not a very brilliant law professor…

…he wants to invent new rights favored by Left.

this is brilliance….?

It’s clear from Dean Koh’s record that he’s a post-sovereign transnationalist. A term he’s used himself.

Anyone who doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism and
U.S. sovereignty doesn’t belong anywhere near our government.

A post-sovereign transnationalist is someone who wants this.
Obama has always chosen to surround himself with such people.

“We the People” Just Say “NO!“

He (Koh) would also represent the U.S. at treaty negotiations and international legal conferences, and will be involved in drafting U.N. Security Council resolutions.

That the U.S. should ratify the Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child regardless of the implications for American sovereignty and federalism.

Apparently we should surrender our sovereignty and throw ourselves on the tender mercies of the rapists, serial abusers and thieves at the UN. And, I’m betting the nations governed by the “religion of peace” are planning to get right on implementing that Rome statute deal.

you can oppose somebody on policy grounds without taking the position that he is the devil incarnate…

True. The devil has many henchmen.

englishqueen01 said: Yeah, that’s my plan, too. How about an

EnglishQueen/Danceswithdachshunds ticket in 2020?

Ummm.. or a Danceswithdachshunds/EnglishQueen ticket in 2020? Okay, how bout we flip for it?

Mr. Obama’s appealing campaign images turned out to have been fleeting. He ran hard to the left on national security to win the nomination, only to discover the campaign commitments he made were shallow and at odds with America’s security interests.

Mr. Obama ran hard to the center on economic issues to win the general election. He has since discovered his campaign commitments were obstacles to ramming through the most ideologically liberal economic agenda since the Great Society.

Mr. Obama either had very little grasp of what governing would involve or, if he did, he used words meant to mislead the public. Neither option is particularly encouraging. America now has a president quite different from the person who advertised himself for the job last year. Over time, those things can catch up to a politician.
Karl Rove, WSJ

He LIED. The MSM was his EAGER megaphone.

That’s how he won.