<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fetch the comfy chair! U.N. Security Council passes new toothless resolution; Update: N. Korea fires two more short-range missiles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:51:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Iran gets taken to the woodshed&#8230;but there&#8217;s no paddle</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-815604</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Iran gets taken to the woodshed&#8230;but there&#8217;s no paddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-815604</guid>
		<description>[...] yes, it&#8217;s comfy chair time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yes, it&#8217;s comfy chair time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hill&#8217;s Blog Briefing Room &#187; Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-730008</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hill&#8217;s Blog Briefing Room &#187; Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-730008</guid>
		<description>[...] O&#039;Brien  The United Nations&#039; response to the North Korean nuclear test was predictably week, Michelle Malkin asserts. Also, a busy day and week for courts is ahead as President Obama prepares to name a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O&#8217;Brien  The United Nations&#8217; response to the North Korean nuclear test was predictably week, Michelle Malkin asserts. Also, a busy day and week for courts is ahead as President Obama prepares to name a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 358 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-708973</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 358 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-708973</guid>
		<description>[...] WHILE OBAMA SLEPT&#8211; &#8220;Fetch the comfy chair! U.N. Security Council passes new toothless resolution; Update: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WHILE OBAMA SLEPT&#8211; &#8220;Fetch the comfy chair! U.N. Security Council passes new toothless resolution; Update: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mancow Gets Waterboarded, says it&#8217;s &#8220;Absolutely torture!&#8221; &#124; The Great Illuminator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-708399</link>
		<dc:creator>Mancow Gets Waterboarded, says it&#8217;s &#8220;Absolutely torture!&#8221; &#124; The Great Illuminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-708399</guid>
		<description>[...] Whether this method of interrogation is torture or not continues to be debated. Brutalizing an individual is indeed un-American, but on the flip side, simply talking with a detainee without the suspect feeling any sense of peril for his/her silence or actions is not enough. Where is that middle ground? Does it include waterboarding, or only the Comfy Chair? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whether this method of interrogation is torture or not continues to be debated. Brutalizing an individual is indeed un-American, but on the flip side, simply talking with a detainee without the suspect feeling any sense of peril for his/her silence or actions is not enough. Where is that middle ground? Does it include waterboarding, or only the Comfy Chair? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gird Your Loins: North Korea Threatens United States, Russia fears North Korea Conflict Could Go Nuclear &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-708361</link>
		<dc:creator>Gird Your Loins: North Korea Threatens United States, Russia fears North Korea Conflict Could Go Nuclear &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-708361</guid>
		<description>[...] Test  Michelle Malkin: The time for O’s mettle test is here: North Korea prepares for war and Fetch the comfy chair! U.N. Security Council passes new toothless resolution; Update: N. Korea fires... and North Korea’s fireworks show continues: Missile launch number three and Reports: North Korea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Test  Michelle Malkin: The time for O’s mettle test is here: North Korea prepares for war and Fetch the comfy chair! U.N. Security Council passes new toothless resolution; Update: N. Korea fires&#8230; and North Korea’s fireworks show continues: Missile launch number three and Reports: North Korea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-708110</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-708110</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On May 26th, 2009 at 7:44 pm, &lt;strong&gt;Kapo&lt;/strong&gt; lgm said: 

I’ve been called stupid, ignorant, what have you. But a decent person would see that this is too far.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You left off idiot.

lmg

Insult your POTUS Bush - okay
Insult Christians - okay
Insult Michelle - okay
Insult all of us by being here - okay

We insult lgm - over the line?

Confirmed:  lgm is 13yo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On May 26th, 2009 at 7:44 pm, <strong>Kapo</strong> lgm said: </p>
<p>I’ve been called stupid, ignorant, what have you. But a decent person would see that this is too far.</p></blockquote>
<p>You left off idiot.</p>
<p>lmg</p>
<p>Insult your POTUS Bush &#8211; okay<br />
Insult Christians &#8211; okay<br />
Insult Michelle &#8211; okay<br />
Insult all of us by being here &#8211; okay</p>
<p>We insult lgm &#8211; over the line?</p>
<p>Confirmed:  lgm is 13yo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason L.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-708042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-708042</guid>
		<description>By the way, a Nuclear Japan?  Red China will not only not want that, I daresay that they will do ANY-thing to keep it from happening, including invading Japan.  While I&#039;d be all for Japan having nuclear weapons, Red China is not, and they will never sit idly by and let Japan rearm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, a Nuclear Japan?  Red China will not only not want that, I daresay that they will do ANY-thing to keep it from happening, including invading Japan.  While I&#8217;d be all for Japan having nuclear weapons, Red China is not, and they will never sit idly by and let Japan rearm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason L.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-708040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-708040</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It takes judgment. I am not ready to declare Obama a failure because in a few months he has not solved a problem that was decades in the making and resisted the efforts of several Presidents before him.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;--lgm&lt;/strong&gt;

What judgement, lgm?  The kind of judgement that sacks a decorated Five-star general who had the right ideas for WINNING the war in Korea?  The kind of judgement that should have let MacArthur be cut loose to WIN the Korean War instead of going for the tie?  lgm, your DEMOCRAT Boy &quot;Give-&#039;em-cream-puffs&quot; Truman is the man who bears the lions&#039; share of the blame for North Korea even beign around.  Hard ot believe that Truman was the same man, who, seven years before, dropped the nukes on Japan and rendered them pacifist for the next six-plus decades!!!!  

How asobut President Clinton&#039;s judgment in sending a clueless Secretary of State in 1994, and again, later, an even more clueless Sec&#039;y of State to &quot;broker&quot; a &quot;deal&quot; that ended up giving the North Korean Government exactly what they wanted based on their bad faith:  A Nuclear Reactor and all the heavy oil they needed to get it going and keep it going.  How&#039;s that for judgment, lgm?

Let&#039;s pray and hope that President Obama DOESN&#039;T have the same kind of &quot;judgment&quot;....

What efforts, lgm?  The efforts of DEMOCRAT President Truman to win the war in Korea?  Ooops, I guess we forgot that Truman went for the tie instead of the win.  There&#039;s one Democrat&#039;s efforts, and it has directly given us the problem we have now.  If DEMOCRAT Truman had WON the war in Korea rather than going for the tie, we&#039;d not have this mess, and likely, Red China wouldn&#039;t be Red.

How about President Clinton&#039;s efforts?  Are Forgettingm lgm, DEMOCRAT Bill Clinton&#039;s giving the NoKos a friggin&#039; NUCLEAR REACTOR based on a false promise form the North Korean Government?  Madeline Allbright waltzing in and signing a deal Kim Jongil had no desire to keep in the firstp lace?  Lets see, that&#039;s two DEMOCRAT Presidents, and Two Efforts, with nothing but TROUBLE as the result.

And what has been the result of President Obama&#039;s desrire for &quot;compassionate&quot; discourse towards the two-bit terror states and ten-penny dicators ,and wanting to &quot;sit down and talk&quot; with our enemies??  Two successful weapons&#039; tests (if we include Iran, that number rises to four) in two months.  And what is President Obama&#039;s reaction?  He&#039;s &quot;angry&quot; and he &quot;condemns&quot; North Korea.  So far, that&#039;s been it:  words and &quot;condemnation&quot;.  President Obama -- if he truly cares about the USA -- needs to put his money where his mouth is.

As some others have posted in here, I have more faith in Kim Jongil and his words than I do our own President&#039;s.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It takes judgment. I am not ready to declare Obama a failure because in a few months he has not solved a problem that was decades in the making and resisted the efforts of several Presidents before him.</em><br />
<strong>&#8211;lgm</strong></p>
<p>What judgement, lgm?  The kind of judgement that sacks a decorated Five-star general who had the right ideas for WINNING the war in Korea?  The kind of judgement that should have let MacArthur be cut loose to WIN the Korean War instead of going for the tie?  lgm, your DEMOCRAT Boy &#8220;Give-&#8217;em-cream-puffs&#8221; Truman is the man who bears the lions&#8217; share of the blame for North Korea even beign around.  Hard ot believe that Truman was the same man, who, seven years before, dropped the nukes on Japan and rendered them pacifist for the next six-plus decades!!!!  </p>
<p>How asobut President Clinton&#8217;s judgment in sending a clueless Secretary of State in 1994, and again, later, an even more clueless Sec&#8217;y of State to &#8220;broker&#8221; a &#8220;deal&#8221; that ended up giving the North Korean Government exactly what they wanted based on their bad faith:  A Nuclear Reactor and all the heavy oil they needed to get it going and keep it going.  How&#8217;s that for judgment, lgm?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s pray and hope that President Obama DOESN&#8217;T have the same kind of &#8220;judgment&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>What efforts, lgm?  The efforts of DEMOCRAT President Truman to win the war in Korea?  Ooops, I guess we forgot that Truman went for the tie instead of the win.  There&#8217;s one Democrat&#8217;s efforts, and it has directly given us the problem we have now.  If DEMOCRAT Truman had WON the war in Korea rather than going for the tie, we&#8217;d not have this mess, and likely, Red China wouldn&#8217;t be Red.</p>
<p>How about President Clinton&#8217;s efforts?  Are Forgettingm lgm, DEMOCRAT Bill Clinton&#8217;s giving the NoKos a friggin&#8217; NUCLEAR REACTOR based on a false promise form the North Korean Government?  Madeline Allbright waltzing in and signing a deal Kim Jongil had no desire to keep in the firstp lace?  Lets see, that&#8217;s two DEMOCRAT Presidents, and Two Efforts, with nothing but TROUBLE as the result.</p>
<p>And what has been the result of President Obama&#8217;s desrire for &#8220;compassionate&#8221; discourse towards the two-bit terror states and ten-penny dicators ,and wanting to &#8220;sit down and talk&#8221; with our enemies??  Two successful weapons&#8217; tests (if we include Iran, that number rises to four) in two months.  And what is President Obama&#8217;s reaction?  He&#8217;s &#8220;angry&#8221; and he &#8220;condemns&#8221; North Korea.  So far, that&#8217;s been it:  words and &#8220;condemnation&#8221;.  President Obama &#8212; if he truly cares about the USA &#8212; needs to put his money where his mouth is.</p>
<p>As some others have posted in here, I have more faith in Kim Jongil and his words than I do our own President&#8217;s&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Send_Me</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707925</link>
		<dc:creator>Send_Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707925</guid>
		<description>Did the Dep. of Education take over the Dep. of State? I mean, this all reminds me of a whiny, emasculated substitute teacher’s endless pleading for the kid next to me to stop slinging spit wads at the chalkboard (you know, the kind that smack and stick to the board?).
Seriously, are there any men left in Washington? This is embarrassing. It’s the day after Memorial Day for crying out loud! They could at least do we relatively few veterans/service members the respect of at least &lt;em&gt;acting &lt;/em&gt;like men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the Dep. of Education take over the Dep. of State? I mean, this all reminds me of a whiny, emasculated substitute teacher’s endless pleading for the kid next to me to stop slinging spit wads at the chalkboard (you know, the kind that smack and stick to the board?).<br />
Seriously, are there any men left in Washington? This is embarrassing. It’s the day after Memorial Day for crying out loud! They could at least do we relatively few veterans/service members the respect of at least <em>acting </em>like men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707909</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707909</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On May 26th, 2009 at 9:19 pm, sonofdy said:

    200,000 soldiers in Af’stan?

    Urkel really surged that many?

Its LGM. Did you really expect him to know what he was talking about???&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not really. I just figured it was typical of liberal statistics...pull a number out of your azz and claim it as true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On May 26th, 2009 at 9:19 pm, sonofdy said:</p>
<p>    200,000 soldiers in Af’stan?</p>
<p>    Urkel really surged that many?</p>
<p>Its LGM. Did you really expect him to know what he was talking about???</p></blockquote>
<p>Not really. I just figured it was typical of liberal statistics&#8230;pull a number out of your azz and claim it as true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707906</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707906</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On May 26th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, lgm said:

    lgm is &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is this over the line? I would appreciate opinions from others here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On May 26th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, lgm said:</p>
<p>    lgm is </p></blockquote>
<p>Is this over the line? I would appreciate opinions from others here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuclear Japan &#8211; the answer to N.Korea? &#171; The Lioness</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuclear Japan &#8211; the answer to N.Korea? &#171; The Lioness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707903</guid>
		<description>[...] Japan &#8211; the answer to&#160;N.Korea?  Michelle Malkin is settling into a comfy chair while N.Korea takes to the skies with more and more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Japan &#8211; the answer to&nbsp;N.Korea?  Michelle Malkin is settling into a comfy chair while N.Korea takes to the skies with more and more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonofdy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707902</link>
		<dc:creator>sonofdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707902</guid>
		<description>AAANNNDDD they just restarted thier nuclear plants.


BOY they sure have the ones number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAANNNDDD they just restarted thier nuclear plants.</p>
<p>BOY they sure have the ones number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonofdy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707901</link>
		<dc:creator>sonofdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707901</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;200,000 soldiers in Af’stan?

Urkel really surged that many?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Its LGM. Did you really expect him to know what he was talking about???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>200,000 soldiers in Af’stan?</p>
<p>Urkel really surged that many?</p></blockquote>
<p>Its LGM. Did you really expect him to know what he was talking about???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicanvet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/26/fetch-the-comfy-chair-un-security-council-passes-new-toothless-resolution/comment-page-2/#comment-707899</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicanvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=28156#comment-707899</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On May 26th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, lgm said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;DBNinKY said (#75):

    Obama has overextended our forces with a 17,000 man surge in Afghanistan,
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And how did the rest of our nearly 200,000 soldiers get there? It was the one who came before.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

200,000 soldiers in Af&#039;stan?

Urkel really surged that many?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On May 26th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, lgm said:</p>
<blockquote><p>DBNinKY said (#75):</p>
<p>    Obama has overextended our forces with a 17,000 man surge in Afghanistan,
</p></blockquote>
<p>And how did the rest of our nearly 200,000 soldiers get there? It was the one who came before.</p></blockquote>
<p>200,000 soldiers in Af&#8217;stan?</p>
<p>Urkel really surged that many?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
