Compare your salary to a California public employee’s

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 27, 2009 05:49 PM

“Special Nurse:” $350,000+

Municipal railway manager: $325,000+

“Administrative services” department head: $280,000+

And no, the figures do not include pensions and benefits.

And they want you to bail them out?

Please.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. California bankrupt - yet a “special nurse” makes $350,000 | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  2. Public Employee Unions Are a Gun Pointed at the Taxpayer’s Head « Teh Resistance Blog
  3. Compare your salary to a California public employee’s | The 2008 Elections
  4. GayPatriot » Easily Debunking Villaraigosa’s Claim of CA’s Broken Budget System
  5. California Needs a Bailout, Gee I Wonder Why | The Lonely Conservative
  6. Public Service is Profitable Service? | Entitlement Syndrome
  7. Blogging Politics
  8. Thursday, May 28, 2009: Daily Handpicked Headlines :: Daily Uprising :: Join the Conservative Counter-Revolution!
  9. BizzyBlog » Lucid Links (052809, Morning)
  10. “I Left My Wallet… in San Francisco”: Huge Gov’t Salaries in “City of Pelosi” Adds to California’s Disastrous Debt « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  11. There’s Absolutely No Waste in California Government* « Scott’s Slant on Politics
  12. And The Truffffffffff Will Set You Free | Un-Liberaled Woman
  13. Unions are huge problem in CA « DirtyRottenScoundrels
  14. Why Is California Going Broke? « Tai-Chi Policy
  15. Compare Your Salary to a California Public Employee's - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
  16. Compare your salary to a California public employees - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #708567
    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Rorschach said:

    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?

  2. #708568
    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Netfest said:

    Do these numbers include benefits and pension? Run them with the benefits & pension, and learn why California is going under.

  3. #708571
    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, Freddy said:

    And of course, here in California, some of us just got a notice for yet another election in an effort to sell some more ‘local’ bonds since the greedy state is stealing from the cities and counties. No doubt, this will help considerably!

  4. #708572
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:01 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?

    Something tells me Gavin Newsome would know…

  5. #708574
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, Ragspierre said:

    http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/26/fdic-treasury-banks-too-big-to-fail-opinions-columnists-sheila-bair.html

    This guy is freaking brilliant…! He agrees with me.

    The term “too big to fail” should lead anyone who utters it to be “re-educated” around the head and shoulders.

    ANY federal money going to bail out this nest of vipers in CA should be out of the question!

  6. #708575
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:08 pm, William Amos said:

    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Rorschach said:
    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?

    San Fransisco Botox treatments ?

  7. #708576
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, California Red said:

    As a California citizen I desperately hope that the Federal Giverment does not bail us out. We made this bed and it is time to lie in it. If the Fed bail us out it will cover up the true cost of liberal feel good policies and big union control that are bankrupting the state.

  8. #708578
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, reutersrutter said:
  9. #708580
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, vsatt said:

    I always wondered how those young CA couples on House Hunters were able to buy $800,000+ homes with neither of them being doctors or lawyers. Now I know.

  10. #708581
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, LoneRanger said:

    I shook the dust of California off my boots 15 years ago and it took two years to convince the tax people that I now lived on another coast. I have never lived in any other state that was so intent on waging war against its citizens.

  11. #708583
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, Hangfire said:

    I met a “Special Nurse” in Bangkok a long time ago, and she probably made close to $200,000 a year.

  12. #708586
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:22 pm, pecze said:

    Maybe Michelle O is on to something by telling us to go into public service.

  13. #708601
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:35 pm, robhic said:

    “On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Rorschach said:

    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?”

    Happy ending?

  14. #708604
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:38 pm, katherine. said:

    to be clear…I wanted to point out these are San Francisco CITY employees (from 2007)….not state employees. Big difference.

  15. #708605
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Those are SF salaries, click the links near the bottom for California and Univ of Cal salaries. How about $1,979,362 as a Professor of Medicine?

  16. #708607
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:44 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Aloha:

    I was wondering who are all those chiefs are that need so much dental work…

  17. #708608
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:46 pm, pecze said:

    Wow…18 of the top paid state employees work in some fashion with various retirement plans. I added them all up from the list, and those guys made over 8 million per year for an average salary of almost 450k.

  18. #708610
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:47 pm, tonyr951 said:

    Ha, that’s peanuts compared to what you make in the University of California School System:

    LINK

    Here’s another list that shows CA state workers pulling in over 500k annually:

    LINK

  19. #708615
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:53 pm, Ralph Gizzip said:

    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Rorschach said:

    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?

    She’s probably the head nurse.

  20. #708616
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:54 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I met a “Special Nurse” in Bangkok a long time ago, and she probably made close to $200,000 a year.

    I once saw a “Special Nurse” featured in Playboy.

    Say, there was an article about the top 100 L.A. city pension abusers, earners, most raking in $100K + annually, in one of the local papers. Former police chief and current councilman Bernard Parks topped the list @ $22,000/mo. It ain’t just the state.

  21. #708618
    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:57 pm, tonyr951 said:

    In tax year 2007, the State of California had more than 38,000 full-time employees with total pay over $100,000. More than 100 state workers earned more than $100,000 just in overtime pay. Others boosted their regular pay with bonuses, premium pay, lump sum payouts and other extra earnings. Find out who they are, what departments they worked for and how much they made by searching the database below.

    SEARCH

  22. #708622
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:00 pm, zorro said:

    Now add all that up with the money stolen by catering to the illegal alien vote. What a scam.

    No bail out for the states. Balance your own budget!

  23. #708629
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:06 pm, Southpaw said:

    Well, now the rest of you know why those of us fiscal conservatives in the state died an unpleasant death a long time ago.

    The government and public policies in the state of California over the past 30 years: FAILURE.

    Do not bail out this mess.

  24. #708633
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:12 pm, DagneyT said:

    I have a fellow alumni from my So Cal high school who told me at our 40th class reunion (5 years ago) that her neighbor was a retired fireman, who moved out of state because he felt guilty about his 6-figure retirement paycheck. Go figure.

    Oh well, maybe it’s just leftist guilt?

    Bottom line, they now live in either Vegas or Phx! Not CA!

  25. #708636
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:20 pm, Southpaw said:

    Keep in mind, rather than address these extreme abuses of taxpayer money, the governator and the politicians are prepared to cut funding to the truly needy, cut school programs like music and athletics, and release 30,000 prisoners onto the streets.

    But the illegal aliens get to keep their share of the resources. Sweet, huh?

  26. #708637
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:25 pm, tarpon said:

    Meanwhile the peasants labor for $50 grand a year. ISn’t this how it always works out.

  27. #708638
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:29 pm, CJ said:

    If non-California taxpayers bail out California, they will have a vested interest in the way California politicians spend the money. Shouldn’t the residents of the other 49 states therefore be allowed to vote in California elections? Is it taxation without representation if my tax dollars go to politicians for whom I cannot vote?

    And what about all those nice services California residents get that I currently don’t qualify for? Shouldn’t I, as a contributor to the California budget, also be eligible for those services? For example, shouldn’t my children be eligible for in-state tuition if my tax dollars are paying for the running of California state universities?

  28. #708640
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:37 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Why not bail out the People’s Republic Kalifornica? Those states who have lived within their means just need to loan their employee’s pension funds to Arnold-what is left of the pension funds after the devaluation of Chrysler and GM bonds.

    And I am sure a $40,000 a year Arizona Highway Patrolman would be glad to take a 15% cut to fund the People’s Republic Kalifornica’s Green Studies program, the Transgender Esteem project or any of the other wacky ideas Moonbeam and friends think of-perhaps a Botox Detox Center in San Francisco or a new state of the art bath house.

    I now await Sean Penn’s position paper on the subject.

  29. #708642
    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:43 pm, WisCon said:

    That is just awful. These scumbag Democrats feel the need to keep upping the minimum wage and taxes which hurt businesses, and they allow public officials to make salaries like these?

    NO FREAKING BAILOUT.

  30. #708644
    On May 27th, 2009 at 8:14 pm, cthelight said:

    Double EXPLITIVE…wow

  31. #708645
    On May 27th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    On May 27th, 2009 at 6:38 pm, katherine. said:

    to be clear…I wanted to point out these are San Francisco CITY employees (from 2007)….not state employees. Big difference.

    Oh yeah, and they have rent control in San Francisco — EVERY rental place. No exceptions. They tried to change that a year or so ago, and it failed. So, a fat salary, pension and benefits and cheap rent.

    Typical liberals.

  32. #708646
    On May 27th, 2009 at 8:21 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Here’s a breakdown of the Nurse’s pay (from the SFGATE.com website)

    Employee name CHRISTIAN KITCHIN,SPECIAL NURSE
    Department DPH-Community Health Network
    Regular pay $117,262
    Overtime pay $216,277
    Other pay $16,785
    Total pay $350,324

    Looks like that double-time pay is really paying off! Not sure what the category “other pay” means, but this guy must work an extra 36 hours or more a week @ double-time, in addition to working a regular 40 hour workweek.

  33. #708651
    On May 27th, 2009 at 8:33 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    wow.

    That is absolutely amazing. I can’t believe those salaries aren’t cut in half. These guys probably led the charge against what the wall street guys got paid.

    No way a government official should make that much. That’s why everything is so expensive there. . . it’s artificially inflated.

  34. #708658
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I was wondering who are all those chiefs are that need so much dental work…

    One guy is a prison dentist – probably full-time work there…

  35. #708659
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:17 pm, rightisright said:

    Can’t hardly imagine why Khalifoniea is broke and that’s without mentioning hundred of millions spent on illegal aliens every year. Is it any wonder all the cities, counties, states and the federal giverment are in financial trouble? I have to wonder do these blue government politicians and employees run their personal budgets in the same manner? Oh yeah, probably so, I forgot about Fannie, Freddie and the banking collapse in the wealthiest country in history. Unbelievable, I want my country back and in 50 pieces not 57 or 60 or how ever many that intellectual Odopey thinks there is.

  36. #708662
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:25 pm, frontierguy said:

    This “special nurse”, male, San Francisco, probably an LPN and not an RN, this guy works at the AIDS clinic (Community Health, think about it). He gets paid 350k plus a year to be a flabotomist (Don’t know how to spell it and not looking it up) and tell people that they should be careful when having sex. This is where I think I may be all for an illegal taking his job so we can get the work done cheaper. to boot, California raised my taxes this year…California deserves to fail.

  37. #708663
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:28 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Rorschach said:

    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?

    “Special” things 350,000 times?

    …all for her fellow union members I bet.

  38. #708664
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:32 pm, rightisright said:

    If the Fed bail us out it will cover up the true cost of liberal feel good policies and big union control that are bankrupting the state.

    the state and the Federal Givernment

  39. #708666
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, kardinal said:

    I work in So-Cal law enforcement I can tell you that not every Officer/Deputy is raking in that kind of dough. I know some of us did well when OT was plentiful, but $200+k a year? I can see that for a police chief or sheriff of a large city or county like LA, SB or Riverside but line staff making that much? That sounds a little weird. But, it is San Francisco so who knows. Same with firefighters, I mean they make good money, but it’s not six figures. Captain, sure, BC’s too. I do remember two deputies that, on a bet, worked 340 or say days one year. They made more than the sheriff. Policy changed after that.

  40. #708667
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:37 pm, Cicero said:

    Michelle, they make so much because government service attracts the very best people in their fields.

    Now excuse me while I SNORT

  41. #708668
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:38 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On May 27th, 2009 at 7:29 pm, CJ said:

    And what about all those nice services California residents get that I currently don’t qualify for? Shouldn’t I, as a contributor to the California budget, also be eligible for those services?

    Sure….once you move to California and start paying even more taxes.

  42. #708670
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:42 pm, kardinal said:

    What’s really killing the state is the retirement benefits that have been extended just about every public employee. It used to be that cops and firemen “safety retirement” or 30% at 50. It was a retirement plan that was intended to take care of folks who took on a risky career and who statistically, rarely made it to retirement. Before we knew it, EVERYONE got sweet deals. 3% @50 means you get 3% for every year worked. So someone who does 30 years on the department get 90% of his/her salary at 50 or older. No, overtime does not count. The number of cops in so cal who last 30 years on the job are few. The number of cubicle drones that last 30 years are plenty.

  43. #708673
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:57 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    Compare your salary to a California public employee’s

    UH……the paycharts didn’t go that low.

  44. #708674
    On May 27th, 2009 at 9:58 pm, jangar said:

    And they want you to bail them out?

    K.M.A.

    California is forever off the list of places to vacation.

    kardinal said:
    I work in So-Cal law enforcement I can tell you that not every Officer/Deputy is raking in that kind of dough

    Just depends on which branch of state government you work for. Some are seen as more valuable than others. And when the threat is made to cut the budget, it’s the essential services that get threatened first. Positions that are created out of thin air for friends and associates (especially those that have a knack at lobbying) are the ones last in line to cut. CA is a micro-example of the pitiful state of DC politics. Let both burn down and we’ll all be better off.

    Like I said…K.M.A.

  45. #708677
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:10 pm, Speakup said:
  46. #708679
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:36 pm, in_awe said:

    Then there are the holidays:

    For state employees the holiday season never seems to end. Their first relief from the back-to-work grind comes in January with Martin Luther King Day.

    In February, they get two holidays four days apart: Lincoln’s birthday and Washington’s birthday. Then they get off on Cesar Chavez Day on March 31.

    Almost all wage earners — private and public — get paid holidays on Memorial Day, the Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s. But in the fall, state workers also sneak in Columbus Day and Veterans Day. The day after Thanksgiving counts as a state holiday as well.

    Add in one “personal holiday” and the annual total for state employees is 14.

    Most of state government shuts down on seven declared holidays that the private sector works. LA Times January 15, 2009

    Schwarzenegger proposed lopping off two paid holidays, Lincoln and Columbus days, reducing the total to 12. That’s closer to what other states offer but still more generous than the federal government, which grants workers 10. The private sector averages eight.

    Schwarzenegger figured he’d save the state $116 million over 18 months but the Dems in the legislature told him no.

    He suggested all state workers take 2 unpaid days off each month (a 10% reduction in pay) that would save the state $1.3B over 15 months and avoid the possibility of layoffs. The Service Employees International Union and other unions told him to pound sand.

    Unfortunately, the state is prohibited from declaring bankruptcy and so there is no easy way to force renegotiation of worker compensation. And Obama came in and told Arnold that since the state is accepting federal dollars he can’t cut back on services.

    The future of the federal government cost structure is being written in CA. Take note.

    Me? I’m praying I can land one of those cushy civil service jobs…

  47. #708681
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:37 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    There is NO ONE in California who expects the feds to bail out the state. Arnold tried to sell Barry on getting the Treasury to guarantee CA muni bonds but even that is not likely to happen. The credit rating on Treasuries is on the brink of downgrade and opening the Pandora’s box of bailing out CA or guaranteeing our debt could push that AAA rating over the edge so what would be the value of a Treasury guarantee?

    After today’s Treasury bond market performance, the reality that we won’t be able to print so much money without triggering hyper-inflation is finally setting in. With all of the market manipulation by banks buying each others’ stocks via their proxies mutual funds buy and financed by TARP money while regulators tell everyone to keep quiet about it, and with the IMF manipulating the price of gold, investors are finding other avenues like buying oil, copper and other commodities. Meanwhile the dollar is once again falling and that is spooking foreigners into selling their longer maturity US Treasuries.

    The wheels are flying off of the bailout wagon. And tomorrow, the Treasury is going to be auctioning off about $60B more 7-yr notes. Look out below.

  48. #708683
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:47 pm, vickisoup said:

    These are San Francisco employees; not State employees.

  49. #708684
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:48 pm, in_awe said:

    Just a note – since 1985 the taxpayers of CA have been net contributors of income taxes to the federal government. The latest number I saw reported that CA got $0.76 back for every $1.00 sent to Washington D.C.

    So, for the past 23 years taxpayers in CA have been subsidizing the other 49 states…

    Having said that, as a CA taxpayer I do not want a federal bailout – but the federal government should pony up the $10B per year we spend on providing services to illegal immigrants in CA. (Yes, $100B in the past decade CA taxpayers have paid because the federal gov’t refuses to secure our borders!) It wouldn’t balance our budget, but it would make a sizable dent in the shortfall.

  50. #708686
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:53 pm, jangar said:

    The wheels are flying off of the bailout wagon. And tomorrow, the Treasury is going to be auctioning off about $60B more 7-yr notes. Look out below.

    When will Obama use Americans as collateral? He’s laid claim to just about everything else.

  51. #708687
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:56 pm, kahall said:

    Great. I realize that it cost a bit more to live in CA but good lord.

  52. #708688
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:56 pm, jangar said:

    Meanwhile, the hungry beast is growling.

    Voters really need to get their heads on straight and take issue at the ballot boxes from now on.

  53. #708689
    On May 27th, 2009 at 10:57 pm, frontierguy said:

    (Yes, $100B in the past decade CA taxpayers have paid because the federal gov’t refuses to secure our borders!)

    LOL, when you have a state that advertises services and benefits for the illegals to go there. When the state actively states that they have “safe” zones where they refuse to cooperate with the feds when it comes to immigration, then no, California does not get to have it both ways. If California cooperated with the feds, stopped providing services to people illegally in the country, stop with the come one come all mentality that fills up its prisons, then no, California gets what it deserves.

  54. #708692
    On May 27th, 2009 at 11:06 pm, frontierguy said:

    oh, in awe, sorry, i agree with everything else you said (I accidentally deleted half of my post), I do not blame Arnold, I blame California voters. Arnold did what they wanted and that was a spend big governor who stayed out of union’s business. Please take note Americans, this is what you are going to get for the whole country.

  55. #708695
    On May 27th, 2009 at 11:31 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Schwarzenegger proposed lopping off two paid holidays, Lincoln and Columbus days

    13 paid holidays (plus 1 floating holiday) for State of California workers- rather generous for anyone I would think. Oh well Kaliforica’s taxes and regulations caused our largest supplier to move to Arizona and save us tens of thousands of dollars a year in freight.

    They moved on a “slip”. They built their operation here and parceled out the business on a diminishing inventory basis over a matter of months. On a Friday they informed the Teamsters Union and the State Compensation fund that XYZ Suppliers Kalifornica was closing and going out of business. All bills, taxes, fees and salary commitments were paid but they were out of the Union contract and Kalifornica.
    All service contracts and remaining inventory were sold to XYZ Suppliers Arizona–I imagine the lawyers made out like bandits. More than a thousand families lost their jobs but their were well paid jobs they lost.

    Thanks Kalifornica!

  56. #708697
    On May 27th, 2009 at 11:56 pm, atheling said:
  57. #708698
    On May 27th, 2009 at 11:58 pm, atheling said:

    Oops, it’s from The Onion.

  58. #708729
    On May 28th, 2009 at 3:41 am, cabrerski said:

    SF police inspectors make more than $200K…you think Dirty Harry would have been a better dresser.

  59. #708730
    On May 28th, 2009 at 4:41 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    atheling said:

    OT, but good – leave it to the Brits:
    atheling said:

    Oops, it’s from The Onion.

    It’s about the difficulty that America’s brown-nosing liberal media might have in reporting an unflattering story about Obama

    It seems some of the Brits are challenging the story as not true! Damn I love the Onion!

  60. #708743
    On May 28th, 2009 at 5:50 am, tpitman said:

    For state employees the holiday season never seems to end. Their first relief from the back-to-work grind comes in January with Martin Luther King Day.

    In February, they get two holidays four days apart: Lincoln’s birthday and Washington’s birthday. Then they get off on Cesar Chavez Day on March 31.

    Almost all wage earners — private and public — get paid holidays on Memorial Day, the Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s. But in the fall, state workers also sneak in Columbus Day and Veterans Day. The day after Thanksgiving counts as a state holiday as well.

    Add in one “personal holiday” and the annual total for state employees is 14.

    Most of state government shuts down on seven declared holidays that the private sector works. LA Times January 15, 2009

    They’ve got to give Veteran’s Day off to give them ample time to protest at their local Marine Recruitment Office.

  61. #708747
    On May 28th, 2009 at 6:19 am, RetFireman said:

    DANG!!!! What fire department were these guys working for? Heck, before I got broken and made to go home, I was making no where near what the one fireman they listed was making. Especially as it is supposedly before overtime and such.

    We had some guys who were just frontline firemen no Capt., A/O, or Chief) who were making over 6 figures a year, (135,000-150,000) but they were working every single possible overtime shift they could. They signed up for it every 4 day and took as much as was offered. One guy would even go out on vacation, and pick up shifts while he was out. They worked constantly and STILL did not approach that amount. Even our Chiefs were no where near those amounts.

    I can only assume those were from San Francisco, L.A. or something like that. Those depts. are notorious for being outrageously paid.

    As for CHP, they don’t reach those amounts either. They highest paid Law Enforcement in Calif. is the CDC guards. Their union has some mighty sweet contracts.

  62. #708760
    On May 28th, 2009 at 8:30 am, jbh45 said:

    As a tax-paying Californian who is being squeezed to death….these state salaries really piss me off. CUT CUT CUT! If any of these “chiefs” want to keep their level of salary, publicly justify it in front of a bi-partisan group of TAXPAYERS!

  63. #708761
    On May 28th, 2009 at 8:33 am, Veretax said:

    The sad part is in my home state of West Virginia the average income isn’t even a tenth of the lowest of those salaries.

  64. #708767
    On May 28th, 2009 at 8:48 am, Paul Revere said:

    That’s more than I’d make in a decade. Must be nice!

  65. #708770
    On May 28th, 2009 at 9:01 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Every two and four years the good people of Califorica have a chance to vote out the bums who caused this mess–from City Council, School Board, County Commissions to the Capitol and Foreigner in Chief.

    As with my state they have some local board elections with a turn out of +/- 8% of registered voters. It is the activist and public employee unions making up too big a part of that 8%.

    In a state with a huge welfare roll, public employee unions and wacked out greens and reds the rest of the people best get off their dead ass and work for and vote for the adults. A 21% turn out for the propositions is not encouraging. Or they can say “Nothing can be done” which becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.

    And when they have the Merit Retention vote on judges vote NO on all of them. Damn people it is your state.

  66. #708772
    On May 28th, 2009 at 9:06 am, RedDog said:

    Sadly, many more states have a similar gravy train. I have a “conservative” friend in Florida who is outspokenly conservative until you talk against his Florida state union retirement contract.

    Disturbing to say the least.

  67. #708776
    On May 28th, 2009 at 9:08 am, diggafromdover said:

    And it’s all so diverse. I love it. I’ll bet there aren’t 5 straight white men in the lot of them.

  68. #708780
    On May 28th, 2009 at 9:16 am, tre said:

    I have a Bachelor degree in electronics, and am making only about 50k a year.

    Those people retire with those good salaries, then move to places like Arizona, and here in Oklahoma, and start “Californicating” those places.

  69. #708809
    On May 28th, 2009 at 9:58 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Let’s see…

    $28k/year…that means some of these people make 10x my salary.

    If either my husband or I made that much, the other would be a stay-at-home parent. Thankyouverymuch.

  70. #708819
    On May 28th, 2009 at 10:03 am, stillontheroad said:

    tre said:

    Same here. After my first layoff – I went to CA about 6 years ago and lived there for 2 before coming back to Kansas. I still receive threats from the DMV about renewing my registration for my car, twice I have written back saying I do not live there. I even had one letter threatening to attach my bank account to pay this.

  71. #708857
    On May 28th, 2009 at 10:41 am, cheapseat said:

    it’s the pensions folks. a 20 year old becomes a california firefighter, by fifty he recieves 90% of his pay for the rest of his life. even gm didn’t give out that lucrative a pension. and the theory that 30 years in due to death and disability as a fireman is based on statistics not seen in this country since the fifties. average life expectancy today, 78 years, what percentage of firefighters in america today are killed on the job. if it’s 1/10 of 1% i would be amazed. and let’s not get into injuries/disabilities because hangnails are 30% disabilities when dealing with police and firefighters unions. ever heard of that dreaded plague on america called asthma, which of course we used to call allergies. but then we never had adhd, carpal tunnel syndrome, or addictions to everything from sex and gambling, to facebook viewing. the rise of sociologists and psychologists.

  72. #708859
    On May 28th, 2009 at 10:43 am, tre said:

    On May 28th, 2009 at 10:03 am, stillontheroad

    Well, CA is broke. They’ve gotta find SOME way to get some money! So, they’re reduced to trying to extort protection money from non-residents.

  73. #708865
    On May 28th, 2009 at 10:50 am, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, why doesn’t the gooberinator change all retirees benefits to a flat rate per employee as a start. It seems unlikely that he has the cajonnes to do something this forward thinking.

  74. #708878
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:03 am, stillontheroad said:

    tre said:
    You think thats bad – a friend of mine sent her daughter to UCSD, payed all the tuition and fees and began receiving letters asking for 300 to 400 dollar donations to help with parking.

  75. #708884
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:11 am, cabrerski said:

    So the “Special Nurse” is making nearly three times the salary by putting enough overtime. I have several lines of thought on that:

    1. Is anyone really checking the time card versus the work performed? Is this person on the clock when sleeping at home?

    2. At what point does it become more economically viable for California to see if they can hire another person, have no overtime, and realize some savings?

    3. Awfully cruel of a sensitive state like California to make this person work as much as they do? When was slavery brought back in fashion? Aren’t they afraid of burning this person out, then having to pay workmen’s comp for stress for the rest of this worker’s life?

    4. The “Special Nurse” has got to be an in-law or sleeping with some big poliical cheese. Who is it…really? And if so, what kind of kickbacks are paid to aquire this kind of dough?

    5. Can we see the expense reports these people file as well? When they spend this much time at the trough, they usually find additional ways to spend more time.

  76. #708891
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:19 am, Ilovemycountry said:

    How can you compare cooking moonshine for a living to running the Administrative Services Department of the world 5th largest economy?

  77. #708912
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:39 am, DBNinKY said:

    How can you compare cooking moonshine for a living to running the Administrative Services Department of the world 5th largest economy?

    Do you have any idea of just how much a half-quart of ’shine goes for these days? Those guys make a mint!

  78. #708914
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:39 am, kardinal said:

    A special nurse is more than likely the director of some city department. Disgustingly overpaid, but still not the norm. As mentioned before, a 20 year old can get hired as a firefighter and retire at 50. Yeah technically true, but I know for a fact that 20 year olds don’t get hired by fire agencies in California. Maybe CDF or the FS but that’s seasonal work on a Hotshot crew or cutting line. Firefighting is way too competitive. The CDC, yeah they got hooked up pretty good, but I not the highest paid in the state.I think CO’s nationwide should be paid better but that’s another topic. Agencies like LA and San Diego aren’t paid nearly as much as the smaller departments like Pasadena, Ontario, or the beach communities.

    I earn $70k a year after 10 years on the job and I’m topped out at my rank. Sounds like a lot but it’s not when you factor in cost of living and such. My wife and I live comfortably but only because we budget and spend our money wisely. We were schooled by Dave Ramsey. Most others in Cali live to check to check. There is an obsession with materialism here that I have not seen anywhere else in the country, save for Manhattan. Please don’t right us all off, there are some good folks here and I think their voices are being heard. As for me, I want out. Texas is on my radar and I when I get there, I promise not to Kaliforniacate anything. I will miss In-N-Out Burger though.

  79. #708920
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:42 am, RetFireman said:

    We still lose over 100 firemen a year to Line of Duty Deaths. And the life expectancy is 5 years after retirement. And do you really want to make he injury claims that you are?

  80. #708927
    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:47 am, Jim M. said:

    The salary levels are indeed shocking. But, I sit here and wonder just what their future exposure is going to be in terms of retirement and retiree health benefits.

    General Motors got to the point to where over $1000 on every new car sold went just to cover retiree health benefits. Given the impending retirement boom for the baby boomers, I wonder just how big California’s exposure is going to be.

  81. #708945
    On May 28th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, emjem24 said:

    California’s paid public servants are more like public prostitutes. These people are so shameless, and know they’re getting OVERPAID, yet don’t seem to care that the average taxpayer is continually raped to pay for their positions. And people wonder WHY CA is BANKRUPT?

    It really says something for a country when public servants are paid too much and its union continues to shill for their lifestyle and pad the coffers of several Dem congress critters, yet we can only pay our military members a fraction of what these state employees get? No wonder Dems’ lips are eternally stuck to the arse of the unions. Overpaid union workers+unsound fiscal policy= corrupt and bankrupt government.

    Oh, my… LGM would be proud. Is this the change and transparency we can believe in? How ’bout fairness and equality?
    And the Dems think that the bonuses of certain Wall Street executives was unjustified? Wow… hypocrisy in action I guess.

  82. #708976
    On May 28th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On May 27th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Rorschach said:

    So what exactly would a “Special Nurse” be doing for $350,000 a year one wonders?

    on staff for the politicians/governor for whatever it is they need?? I can’t think of a thing having spent some time as a medic in the AF what could possibly be worth that much…some physicians don’t make that much…give me a break…

  83. #708977
    On May 28th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, tre said:

    On May 28th, 2009 at 11:03 am, stillontheroad

    If not for the fact that I dream of traveling the entire length of Route 66, which ends in LA, someday, I see no reason to ever go to CA.

    Oh, and the Lincoln Highway ends in San Fransicko. I’d like to travel the Lincoln Highway someday too.

  84. #709006
    On May 28th, 2009 at 1:02 pm, stillontheroad said:

    tre said:

    The 1 Highway along the coast is a great trip also. Once you get through San Fran that is

  85. #709032
    On May 28th, 2009 at 1:40 pm, cheapseat said:

    ret fireman; so 100 die per year, are there more than 100,000 firemen in the u.s. 100,000 x .1% = 100. i’m sure california has more than 100,000 firemen, so firefighters are a hell of a lot safer than construction workers. and yes, i will claim a lot of police/firefighters disability out on unprovable injuries, chronic back ache, etc. who doesn’t have chronic back ache? who doesn’t have arthritis? due to my military service and injuries sustained there i could recieve disability, but i have worked for 35 years taking aspirin and naproxin sodium. cowboy up.

  86. #709040
    On May 28th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, Ron C said:

    “California legislators get a per diem, worth $35,000 a year, TAX FREE. They also get $400 a month towards a car, a gas card for free gas, and much more.”

    “At the same time they have created a $120 billion debt and almost $100 billion deficit in five years. If the voters won’t throw them out the least we can do is cut off their benefits. They created prevailing wage and AB 32 policies meant to kill your job, then you are expected to give them a free car!”

    Above quotes from Steve Frank who keeps a sharp eye on the doings of CA criminals in office.

  87. #709173
    On May 28th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, Papa Louie said:

    “Special Nurse:” $350,000+
    Municipal railway manager: $325,000+
    “Administrative services” department head: $280,000+

    Those salaries? Oh, they’re just um, er, ah, er um retention bonuses. Yeah, that’s it, retention bonuses, like the ones given out at Merrill Lynch.

    With all the rich people leaving the state to avoid higher taxes, something had to be done to keep the people who got us into this mess from leaving too. Besides, with all the Hollywood weirdos, including the Governator, running around the state, don’t these people deserve some kind of extra compensation?

    Next, you’ll be asking why California doesn’t fix their budget woes by replacing all these high paid bureaucrats with cheap labor from across the border. Actually, I’d never thought of that before. It might be a good idea. They would certainly have more “empathy” for the common man than some privileged white college grad with a fancy title. And isn’t that the number one qualification now days for any job in Obamaland?

  88. #709178
    On May 28th, 2009 at 4:21 pm, T-Bone said:

    Be careful about passing judgement on salary levels. After all, Obama wants to be the “Decider” in how much anyone should make. If he thinks you make to much and the janitor makes too little, he will take from you and give to the janitor. Thats redistribution after all. He also wants to set the comp level of corporate CEOS. Why not state employees? And how about A-Rod or Manny Ramirez playing baseball and earning $25 million a year? I think thats too much also.

    However, when you pay people certain amounts and they drive they business into bankruptcy, then I think they may be getting more than they should.

    That goes for State workers and United Auto Workers union members. The market will determine it. Not some political hack in D.C. that has alternative motives (votes). No bailout please. Let them restructure their costs to be in line with their revenues.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook