Moron of the day

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 1, 2009 10:53 PM

No, the moron of the day award does not go to the Playboy.com Neanderthal who published a Top 10 list (now yanked from the site and replaced with a Playboy model shoving her backside at readers) of conservative women he’d like to “hatef*ck.”

The moron of the day award goes to Anne Schroeder Mullins at Politico, who cluelessly embraced and promoted the porn magazine’s misogynist drivel — and completely misrepresented the list to Politico’s readers by whitewashing all the vulgarity out of it:

Mullins (or a commenter using her name) admits in the comments section of her moronic post that she deserves the award:

I am truly pathetic to promote an article that advocates rape of conservative women.

Posted By: Anne Schroeder Mullins | June 01, 2009 at 08:55 PM

OK, I admit it. I am truly pathetic.

Posted By: Anne Schroeder Mullins | June 01, 2009 at 08:57 PM

Writes another Politico commenter:

Anne Schroeder Mullins- You must be one of three things: 1. an idiot who didn’t understand the article, 2. a moron who didn’t even bother to read the article, 3. an offensive jackass and sexist who thought an article about fantasy raping women is amusing and worth sharing. Either way, you suck.

Posted By: fed-nad | June 01, 2009 at 10:58 PM

We concur.

***

Runner-up: Salon.com writer Gabriel Winant for “Screwing Michelle Malkin.” Winant says he found the Playboy.com attack “creepy,” but admits the piece “managed to get one or two guilty smiles out of me.”

Which part made you smile, creep? (Language warning):

Of TownHall columnist Amanda Carpenter, [Playboy.com columnist] Cimbalo writes, “The Hate Fuck Rating: This foul temptress is a walking, talking Faustian fuck bargain.” Michelle Malkin is a “highly fuckable Filipina” and a “Beelzebabe.” And “The View”’s Elisabeth Hasselbeck is just begging for defilement: “She’s the clean-cut American sweetheart who elicits our filthiest thoughts. Endlessly perky, this golden goddess probably has her Catholic school uniform still in the closet, and she wouldn’t mind putting it on before taking it off for a session of sweaty, anti-American hate fucking.”

***

Ed Driscoll has a round-up here.

Caleb Howe took screenshots of the entire hit piece before Playboy.com disappeared it.

Posted in: Playboy, Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Playboy “playfully” advocates rape of popular conservative women writers « Sister Toldjah
  2. Conservative women they’d like to “hate-f**k” - now pulled from Playboy site | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  3. No Hate Here at Playboy, Guys… Just Some Good Ol’, Fun-Lovin’ Power-Rape of Conservative Women « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  4. Question: When Is a Hate Crime Not A Hate Crime? « Teh Resistance Blog
  5. Hugh Hefner to sack Playboy bunnies amid financial crisis - MightyRighty.com - Conservative News, Discussion and Community
  6. Random Nuclear Strikes » Two! Two!
  7. Recruiter Shooter [Dan Collins]
  8. Smug little t*rd… « Innocent Bystanders
  9. Moonbattery
  10. Ed Driscoll » Playboy: In Like Flynt
  11. Ed Driscoll » Hefnerpalooza Update
  12. Michelle Malkin » Another day, another hate wish
  13. Michelle Malkin » Mapping the “climate of hate”
  14. Angelina Jolie Most Powerful Celebrity
  15. Heading Right! » Playboy Allows Writer to tap inton “Inner Rapist”
  16. The Only Ones With Cajones in the GOP are Women : Stop The Liberals Now
  17. Bravo, Elisabeth… Elisabeth Hasselbeck Goes After Playboy for Disgusting ‘Hate-Rape of Top 10 Conservative Women’ Article (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  18. Genrewonk » Playboy invents PC term for rape
  19. Public’s ‘Right to Know’ Censored: AOL Fires Writer Tommy Christopher for Reporting Sexist Hate-Rape Playboy Article « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  20. Blue Collar Republican » Blog Archive » Playboy’s Conservative Hate F#@k
  21. Moe Lane » Newsbusters: AOL is lying about the Playboy Rape List firiing.
  22. Newsbusters: AOL is lying about the Playboy Rape List firiing. - Moe_Lane’s blog - RedState
  23. Newsbusters: AOL is lying about the Playboy Rape List firiing. - Moe_Lane’s blog - RedState
  24. Memo to America: Joking about rape is just not funny. | Buzz Blog
  25. PJ Columnist Palin Comparison to REAL Journos? | DEEP BRAIN DIARY
  26. Carrie Prejean, on Being Fired by Miss California Pageant, ‘I Was Speechless’ | Sean Hannity Exclusive Video Interview « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  27. Media Lizzy » Playboy writer Guy Cimbalo creates Top 10 List of GOP Women he’d like to rape

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #711497
    On June 1st, 2009 at 10:56 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    H.F. basically being a not at all subtle euphenism for rape.

  2. #711500
    On June 1st, 2009 at 10:59 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Pigs who loath women, but will cloyingly tell them what they want to hear to get what they want.

    I have never known a real Leftist man, and I have never known a real Leftist male who was not…at his core…either afraid of women or secretly hated them.

    Broad brush, perhaps, but there it is…

  3. #711501
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:00 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Peggy Noonan was pro-Obama, wasn’t she? Wasn’t she one of the Chris Buckley/Colin Powell ‘Republicans’ who though Obama was so much cooler than the old guy and his state university educated running mate who was so uncool she wouldn’t even abort her Downs baby.?.?

  4. #711504
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:03 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Ah, yes…Peggy. (Sigh)

    There was a time when I loved that woman for the words she gave the Gipper, and her fine Irish sense.

    Gone now, that younger, freer Peggy.

  5. #711506
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:04 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Does that mean this list is a hate crime?

    Clearly, she is just jealous of the fact that conservative women are good looking, and liberal women look like Helen Thomas.

    You can’t expect much more from a low brow gossip monger.

  6. #711509
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:07 pm, TxSkirt said:

    Michelle, I am so sorry that you have to put up with this crap. I pray for your children’s ears and eyes to be protected from such filth written about their mother. It is a sad day in America when such a hate filled rant can be published even in a magazine as repugnant as Playboy. “Moron” may be the proper word, but somehow it doesn’t seem harsh enough. God bless.

  7. #711510
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:08 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Yup, even if decency and decorum didn’t rule it out, I can’t see anyone picking women like Helen Thomas, Janeane Garofalo or Rosie O’Donnell for any kind of list remotely related to attractiveness.

  8. #711515
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:13 pm, MikeOK said:

    “I can’t see anyone picking women like Helen Thomas, Janeane Garofalo or Rosie O’Donnell for any kind of list remotely related to attractiveness.”

    I’d say it’s a pretty good bet that most of the male writers out there with sick rape fantasies are liberals, not conservatives.

    And really, could anyone even put together a list of ten female liberal tv news, blog, and newspaper personalities that can stack up to the women on Playboy’s list in the brains and beauty department? I doubt it.

  9. #711517
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:13 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I guess I’ll have to Ask.com for Dana Perino…

  10. #711519
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:14 pm, b-cat said:

    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:07 pm, TxSkirt said:

    My sentiments exactly.

  11. #711520
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:15 pm, jangar said:

    moron of the day

    Only one?

  12. #711522
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:16 pm, Truesoldier said:

    Until I saw your post I was willing to put this guy up as a nomination:

    State Department spokesman Robert Wood said the U.S. wants North Korea to return to stalled six-party disarmament negotiations, but the Obama also administration wants a “strong, unified” message sent to North Korea that its “belligerent” actions have consequences.

    Asked if the U.S. was reconsidering its approach to the North, Wood said that “because things haven’t worked doesn’t mean you don’t keep trying.”

  13. #711523
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:16 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Dana Perino was GWB’s press secretary after Tony Snow suffered a relapse of his cancer.

    Somehow that seems extra vile, going after a woman who isn’t even in the spotlight anymore.

  14. #711524
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:17 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Speaking only for myself, I am reminded of (I think H.L.Minken’s) statement on the appearance of a hairy-legged Communist, “It makes you want to burn every bed in creation”. Or words to that effect.

    I am often reminded of that when I see leading Statist women. (Shiver)

  15. #711525
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:18 pm, jangar said:

    The left is a godless pit of filth. Don’t bother looking for any redeeming qualities.

  16. #711526
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:19 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    EGADS!!! A really hot shower is in order.

    What the hell is wrong with people? I know that some people either have no home training or simply refuse to use it, but damn!! And for a woman to repost such trash or condone it in any way tells me pretty much everything I need to know about her. TxSkirt may be right about ‘moron’ not being harsh enough….

    Imbecile???
    Idiot???
    Dolt???

    My personal pick… Jackass!

  17. #711527
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:19 pm, USCitizen said:

    Whew! I have to read ALL moron of the day posts just to be sure I’m not the subject.

    Good call, Michelle.

  18. #711528
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:20 pm, rowsdower said:

    Here’s one conservative male’s perspective:Women are for loving and cuddling. Not “hate-f*****g”.

  19. #711529
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:21 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    But it IS another sign that conservatives are winning. These libs don’t even bother attacking Republicans anymore. It’s become too much like beating up the class weanie.

  20. #711530
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:21 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Truesoldier-

    a bit off topic, but re the Norks and Obama: the Norks seem to already have at least a crude nuclear device, and medium range missiles, and although they have bugs, they are working to improve both and develop long range missiles.

    So Obama can find US taxpayers (or borrowed Chinese or printed Federal Reserve) money somehow to make sure UAW union members can still make a combined $80 per hour in pay and benefits even though American workers in the South can build Toyotas and Hondas for little more than half that, but he needs to cut spending on missile defense programs to protect Alaska and the West Coast.

    That is Moron of the Decade worthy.

  21. #711531
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:23 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Disgusting… this is no different that what Tiller did to the babies… more hatred spew from the libs…

  22. #711532
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:24 pm, frontierguy said:

    The left gets away with so much unprofessional drivel it is mindboggling. These same morons cry over the slightest perceived bash. Okay to fantasy rape conservative women, wth? You are right Rags, leftist men are never men, except for the gangster minority types and the only reason they vote democrat is because they have no respect for the rule of law and know they are weak on enforcement. Lefty men apologize for everything threatening to them in the world then proclaim how brave they are when really they run from confrontation that they may get hurt from. They puff out their chest when they are in safe zones and again ask for people to marvel at their bravery. It is why the Muslim world does not respond to it, they respect power and strength. They are sniffing Obama and smell a weak kneed, no gumption individual who would probably be more comfortable in a burka. They will exploit this, it is in their nature. I would like to make a list of the liberal women I would love to have deported to Iran.

  23. #711534
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:24 pm, rightisright said:

    So sorry MM, for the crap you have to put up with by people that actually consider themselves Americans when they like the troll on here IHateMyCountry, hate America.
    If there was ever guilt by association the lefties have it, what a bunch of sick, narcissistic ba$tards one and all. How sick does one have to be to even conger up such idiotic tripe?
    You libs have to be the most miserable people on earth, sick and miserable.

  24. #711535
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:26 pm, Truesoldier said:

    Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul,

    And just to add more confusion to Obama, NoKo has gone and done this.

  25. #711537
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:27 pm, jangar said:

    and although they have bugs, they are working to improve both and develop long range missiles

    and…they…are…taking…their…time.

    If this crap ‘creeps up on’ TheOne, then we’re screwed before he parked the car.

  26. #711542
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:29 pm, The Ugly American said:

    …now yanked from the site and replaced with a Playboy model shoving her backside at readers…

    LOL….God love you, Michelle for doing the dirty work for us.

  27. #711547
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:30 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On June 1st, 2009 at 10:56 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    H.F. basically being a not at all subtle euphenism for rape.

    I agree.

    And that idiot was gleefully promoting the rape of these women because he can’t beat them intellectually.

  28. #711548
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:30 pm, Truesoldier said:

    So where oh where have the feminists gone? I expect to hear them denouncing this trash in….oh wait the list is about Conservatives what was I thinking.

  29. #711550
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:35 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    “…probably has her Catholic school uniform still in the closet, and she wouldn’t mind putting it on before taking it off for a session of sweaty, anti-American **** ****.”

    It’s worse than you’re giving him credit for. Attractive women who disagree with him not only deserve to be raped…deep down they want to be. That’s about as low as a male (he doesn’t deserve to be called a “man”) can go. The lefties don’t object to this, but don’t you dare say anything truthful about Islam’s founder or any of a 1,000 other things.

  30. #711552
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:36 pm, BadIdeaGuy said:

    I know it’s semantics, but putting Anne Mullins down as “moron of the day” is an affront to morons everywhere.

    It’s difficult to adequately describe such scummy behavior. The “h-f” concept is misogynistic if not denoting sexual assault. Then to turn it to “hate to love” is just– a little sick.

    I guess if there’s one thing running in Playboy’s favor vs Politico with this, it’s that nobody (besides Mullin, evidently) reads the articles in Playboy. However, people don’t go to politico to check out caricatures of Anne Schroeder Mullins.

  31. #711556
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:40 pm, frontierguy said:

    Oh yeah, Michelle, I am so sorry that you have to put up with the hate fest from the left, the miserable cockroaches they are. I’m guessing with nasty comments such as these, the men at playboy not only do not know how to treat women, they probably would secretly rather be doing each other. From a psychological standpoint, many times such hatred of women is from latent homosexuality causing hypersex drives while treating women as objects and having a deep disgust for them at the same time. These men probably find “excuses” to go to the playgirl shoots then after they are turned on go find some women to objectify, pigs.

  32. #711559
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:44 pm, BuckeyeSam said:

    Moan here all you want: get over to Politico and e-mail Mullins and a few of her high-profile superiors. Politico is a disgrace.

    Here’s the substance of my e-mail to Anne Schroeder Mullins, Mike Allen, and Jim VandeHei, all of Politico:

    If you’re appearing on Morning Joe tomorrow for the Political Playbook, maybe you’ll want to highlight that

    Here’s my e-mail and tip to her. Disgracefule. Nice staff, by the way. Politico has zero credibility:

    Anne Schroeder Mulluns (sic)should be fired. The Web page to which she linked advocated “hate-f**king” each of these women.

    When one of your guys is doing Politico’s Playbook tomorrow morning on Morning Joe, maybe he’ll highlight it. Peggy Noonan, a regular guest every Friday, might have a laugh.

    http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/01/its-official-playboy-is-a-hate-site/

    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/01/moron-of-the-day/

  33. #711561
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:47 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    Damned who reads that worthless POS rag anymore? It’s like Rolling Stone just a bunch of libs trying to be relevant.

    I keep getting notices in the mail to subscribe for 12 dollars a year. Are you kidding me?

    Playboy has LONG outlived its usefulness. There are too MANY ways to get stuff like this for free.

    Just like newspapers they are on shaky ground I’m sure.

  34. #711562
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:47 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I think a real reason why a lot of liberal men support abortion, is because they think it’ll make women more likely to take them home for a one night stand at the bar if they think that have a ’safety outlet’.

    It isn’t to liberate women, it is to have more no committment sex.

  35. #711566
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:51 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:30 pm, Truesoldier said:
    So where oh where have the feminists gone?

    Being good little Stepford Wives to the White Male Leaders of the Liberal Left; in other words being bimbo tools.

  36. #711568
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:52 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Back before I was married, and before I started to go to church again, I actually did subscribe to Playboy, mainly for the articles.

    The poses in the 1980s version of Playboy were a lot less vulgar than most men’s magazines, and about 15 pages of nudity were balanced with about 150 pages of articles.

    IIRC, John F Kennedy discovered the 007 books reading an excerpt from one of Fleming’s novels in Playboy.

    I miss the freedom to watch bad television in my boxers and a t-shirt while drinking a beer, just a little, but I’m actually very glad not to be single.

  37. #711570
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:54 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Asked if the U.S. was reconsidering its approach [to North Korea], Wood said that “because things haven’t worked doesn’t mean you don’t keep trying.”

    Wood does deserve to be runner up to the moron of the day. His comment sounds an awful lot like Einstein’s definition of insanity:

    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

    North Korea knows we’re not actually going to do anything harmful to them. In fact, they have learned the opposite: the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Every time they do something threatening, the world offers bribes in exchange for the mere “promise” that they will stop. They haven’t kept any of their promises, and there’s no reason for them to do so.

    You can’t Throw steak at a barking dog and expect it to go away or stop barking. But you can expect other strays to show up and start making a fuss, too.

  38. #711574
    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:58 pm, Joy said:

    This is so beyond the pale there are no words……

    The Leftists must be really proud of themselves today. No outrage for a murdered troop, and no outrage for wishing rape on women who disagree with their politics. I don’t think there is a cure for this sickness.

    Where are the feminists??? They’ve come a long way baby… or maybe not.

  39. #711578
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 12:11 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Let me guess. There is no top 10 list of Liberal women, right?

    Helen Thomas comes to mind.

  40. #711580
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 12:26 am, thefoundingfathers said:

    I am surprised that the list did not include Ann Coulter.

  41. #711581
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 12:27 am, thefoundingfathers said:

    Obviously the liberal men are jealous that conservative women actually practice good hygene….lol

  42. #711583
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 12:29 am, Joy said:

    BAL – I think you may have misread the topic…………………

    No sane person wants ANY woman on this list!

    And do you really want to say you want to rape Helen Thomas? REally?

    Think before you type. Raping women who disagree with your politics is a SICK notion. Gah…

  43. #711584
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 12:35 am, WarEagle82 said:

    Every time I swear they can’t go any lower they prove me wrong.

    This is easily one of the sickest things I have seen this year. Can you imagine someone posting a similar article about leftist women? Can you imagine the unending howls from the MSM that would accompany such a post?

    Sorry you have to put up with this vile stuff. Maybe we should take up a fund to buy you a ballistic vest and a sidearm. A Walther PPK fits a diminutive hand really well. It is the rage among all the Filipinas I know. But you want to go for the hollow point ammo for maximum stopping power for these perverts! Does Maryland even allow concealed carry? Move to Virginia and we will form a posse to protect you. You can start a club called “The REAL Malkin Watch!”

    These people make me sick…

  44. #711589
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 12:57 am, vatodio said:

    A Liberal soft Porn publisher makes a fantasy list of smart women to hate-f**k.

    More than half of the women in USA identify themselves as feminist / liberals. And they are not outraged at this hate filled vile!
    In fact, a total silence from these overly sensitive feminazis at NOW or any other women’s groups!

    Either these women are the Cheerleaders to Liberal men’s hate-f**king orgies
    OR
    they really are stupid bunch.

  45. #711590
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 1:16 am, Hangfire said:

    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:52 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Back before I was married, and before I started to go to church again, I actually did subscribe to Playboy, mainly for the articles.

    The poses in the 1980s version of Playboy were a lot less vulgar than most men’s magazines, and about 15 pages of nudity were balanced with about 150 pages of articles.

    IIRC, John F Kennedy discovered the 007 books reading an excerpt from one of Fleming’s novels in Playboy.

    I miss the freedom to watch bad television in my boxers and a t-shirt while drinking a beer, just a little, but I’m actually very glad not to be single.

    When I was about 16, my father caught me looking at a Playboy magazine. Calmly, but confronting me, he asked what I was doing, and if I thought my mother would want me with such a magazine.

    I replied that I didn’t care for the pictures of naked women (yeah, right), but I thought the articles were interesting.

    At that, he applied the back of his hand at warp speed to the side of my head. It was the first and only time he had ever done anything stronger than spanking me when I was a small child.

    He said, “For looking at the pictures, you get the book confiscated. For reading the articles, you get the back of my hand.”

  46. #711594
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 1:32 am, greenLibertarian said:

    The list certainly was a list of attractive women, inside and out. It is unfortunately that Playboy lacked the class to at least leave out the hate and mention the intelligence and spirit of these women – which really make their packages.

    Wasn’t a PB fan, now will never patronize anything associated with it.

  47. #711595
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 1:34 am, WisCon said:

    Just disgusting. If this had been done to liberal women, you would hear calls for firings for the next month.

  48. #711596
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 1:38 am, yohannbiimu said:

    Amazing! And WE’RE the hate-mongers? Uh-huh…

    You know, it goes farther than just merely being misogynistic and utterly hateful, because there’s a very strong sense of utter insanity here, when the left is supposed to be on the side of feminine dignity and equality, but when it comes right down to it, they are utterly devoid of even the slightest notion of humanity and dignity. The American left is barbarity personified.

  49. #711599
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 1:43 am, airbrush101 said:

    Now I have a nice list of women to admire, look up to, read about their life accomplishments and enjoy their writings and opinions.

  50. #711606
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 1:55 am, vickisoup said:

    I’m speechless. Absolutely speechless. :shock:

  51. #711607
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:09 am, love2rumba said:

    Well…what a week it has been..is it over yet?

    Other than that I can’t add any more, except to wonder what’s it going to be like in America societally when the crap REALLY hits the fan…

  52. #711613
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:33 am, bear1909 said:

    Threats of violence should be taken seriously. There isnt any voice of constraint coming from the Left.

    Screaming on blogs for violent defilement of women- i ask you, what is the difference between that kind of banal vulgarity and the actions of SA Brown Shirts in Germany? What does Howard Dean, Chair of The Democratic National Committee think of his “fringe” element of the “base”? What does Nancy Pelosi think of it? Dianne Feinstein? Ahhhnold’s wife Maria SchwarzenKennedy? Or Caroline The Princess, for that matter. They have “Catholic Girl” uniforms too dont they? (I know I know…Feinstein is a Jew).

    It’s okay to defile a Catholic in the public forums of this land, is it not? Or gun down soldiers for “political reasons”?

    What does the President of the United States think of his base? Can he not call for some decency? Is he endorsing these unprovoked attacks upon female professional journalists? Is he not obligated to reign in these animals?

    Calling them Nazis is too good of a label for what they are doing. If one of these women is harmed, will they be held accountable?

    These actions by Playboy and Politico spell real danger. These are acts of intimidation of dissent by thug tactics of the most reprehensible sort: the threat of rape.

    These pigs should be sued for slander. Better still, their personal lives should be exposed as a breeder nest of perversion and self-hatred that would allow them to debase themselves with this foulest of displays.

    Their mothers would be truly ashamed of them, the most profound disgrace of all— to think the mothers kept these pigs alive in their wombs for nine months, kept them alive when they were too small to care for themselves as children, tried to train them and raise them right to have a scrap of decency in their hearts.

    All so that they could cackle about raping women who are doing their journalistic duties in one of the most profound crises this Nation has had to endure.

    Shame doesn’t have to be acknowledged by a perpetrator for it to hollow out his soul. Denial is a really bad way to go.

    Stay alert. The violence and the threat of violence is being used very very concertedly against dissentors.

    I dare the Left to point out how this same tactic was used against them the past 8 years under Bush.

    I dare them.

    Bear1909 out.

    PS: I am apalled. But not surprised.

  53. #711614
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:34 am, Joy said:

    loves2 – I believe we are living in the last days and that things are going to get really really ugly. Great despair is coming to this country and the world.

    I feel like the little man with the beard walking the streets with a sign that says, “Repent.” On one hand I want to yell it, and on the other plead with the love Father has for his children… please repent allow your hearts to be changed and filled with the love of Christ.

    I really have to fight off the extreme anger I feel towards those on the left and psychos like these who would wish such horrific things on women they disagree with politically. I have to refocus and pray to not allow people like this to define who I am by changing me into a hateful person like themselves.

    The heart-breaking actions of a few in the last couple of days between the murders and the subject of this post with the utter silence from the left is overwhelming.

    Right now my hope is fixed on the Second Coming of Christ. He, and He alone can bring peace, but not until there is a great purging. It’s not going to be pretty and my heart breaks for those who insist on continuing down a path to destruction.

  54. #711616
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:39 am, bear1909 said:

    And as an important aside, could men posting on this blog refrain-on this thread- from commenting on the physical attributes and virtues of the women named on that list?

    Nothing is more repugnant than some swingin d*ck who is unable to restrain himself during a discussion of rape threats, and MUST comment on women’s bodies and physical attractiveness.

    What the sam H*ll is that about? Show some respect. Make your Mother proud of you for just once.

    Bear1909 out.

  55. #711617
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:43 am, love2rumba said:

    Thank you for your thoughts, Joy… goodnight.

  56. #711618
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:54 am, greenLibertarian said:

    -WE- need to change our country, not wait for a possible second coming. If there is a deity, it gave us the spirit and will to make a difference, we should not sit back and wait for it to do what needs to be done. Sorry Joy, but we have to do this job.

  57. #711620
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 2:56 am, Bogtrotter said:

    Yes, one of those little nasty things a goodly number of them (I think the majority) will yuck it up over…..a bit nervously……as long as it is conservative women. Imagine the outrage if it had been a list of liberal woen. But I can honestly not think of any well known conservative columnist, blogger, or pundit who would even think of doing so.

  58. #711621
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 3:09 am, Bogtrotter said:

    After readng the list, I have to wonder if jealousy was a motivating factor. The writer will gain some moentary attention, but is still way WAY down the foodchain when compared to anyone on the list. They will continue on and be given the attention and respect they have earned While Ms. Mullins will remain a true bottom feeder.

  59. #711623
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 3:24 am, nbarry said:

    Where have all the feminists gone? They hailed Eliot Spitzer as their knight in shining armor until the awful truth came out. No wonder they have become gun shy.

  60. #711624
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 3:27 am, Joy said:

    Sorry Joy, but we have to do this job.

    What did I say that made you think I’m not ready to do the job that needs to be done?

    I can look forward to the Second Coming while still doing what is necessary in the here and now.

  61. #711625
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 3:32 am, conservative in europe said:

    Michele,

    Want to have fun with these idiots? This is a violent threat made in public. File a restraining order. If nothing else, it makes it illegal for them to possess a firearm (the liberals who scream loudest for gun control tend to own firearms..). Plus, it would be good fun to watch the idiots try to act indignant.

    Just an idea.

  62. #711631
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 4:30 am, zorro said:

    Hate speech charges for Lou Mohn of Playboy, Salon.com writer Gabriel Winant and Anne Schroeder Mullins at Politico should be considered by the authorities.

    On June 1st, 2009 at 11:07 pm, TxSkirt said:
    Michelle, I am so sorry that you have to put up with this crap. I pray for your children’s ears and eyes to be protected from such filth written about their mother. It is a sad day in America when such a hate filled rant can be published even in a magazine as repugnant as Playboy. “Moron” may be the proper word, but somehow it doesn’t seem harsh enough. God bless.

    My thoughts exactly TX.

    May God protect you and your family Michelle.

    Those morons should be on their knees praying to God to forgive them, I am finding it very difficult to do so.

  63. #711640
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 6:17 am, mytake said:

    Wonder if this will be discussed on “The View” and if the other women will even care? Poor Elizabeth!

  64. #711647
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am, vsatt said:

    Mytake, you just made me actually consider tivo-ing The View.

    All I can say is if you ever start to doubt your convictions of what’s right and wrong, just remember creeps like Cimbalo who are fomenting on the other side. If you disagree with their values and politics and find them repulsive, you’ve made the right choice. If you think you might agree with them on some things, take a very long serious look at yourself.

  65. #711651
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 7:20 am, Socky said:

    Lefties are such beautiful people.

  66. #711667
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:02 am, tre said:

    Michelle, for you, and the other women on that list, this is all I have to say:

    Matthew 5:10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
    for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

  67. #711669
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:17 am, gco said:

    It seems like a kind of inversion of the hate-crime concept. To them (Playboy, etc.), an awful crime, rape, is acceptable if it is done to a victim who doesn’t think the right way. The people behind this article/list are genuinely vicious.

  68. #711670
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:20 am, mngirl said:

    I took Politico off of my blog roll back during the election. Now I’m really glad I did.

    They took the Lefty media and put it on the internet. Whenever one of their reporters shows up on a Fox News Panel they are defending the Left side of the argument.

  69. #711672
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:22 am, Socky said:

    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:17 am, gco said:

    It seems like a kind of inversion of the hate-crime concept. To them (Playboy, etc.), an awful crime, rape, is acceptable if it is done to a victim who doesn’t think the right way. The people behind this article/list are genuinely vicious.

    That’s a great comment. Mind if I steal it?

  70. #711674
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:25 am, CO2 Producer said:

    the Playboy.com Neanderthal

    Why must you mock Neanderthals so harshly, Michelle?

    shoving her backside at readers

    Heh. It’s as if Playboy’s trying to tell you what it is. I’ll never look at another “404″ page the same way again.

    That Cimbalo dude’s got some serious issues. He insulted a lot of good and mainly married women in that article, though I assume the vulgarities and insinuations would be just as insulting to any woman whether they are married or not. I am ashamed and apologetic for ever buying a copy of that magazine.

    As for Mullins, I have little need to elaborate on what’s already been said except to mention that if she has a membership with N.O.W., it should be revoked.

  71. #711682
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:45 am, sbw999 said:

    Classy lot, those liberals. Their constant lowering of the bar of decency for the past 40 years has led to this gem.

  72. #711683
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:47 am, jangar said:

    As for Mullins, I have little need to elaborate on what’s already been said except to mention that if she has a membership with N.O.W., it should be revoked.

    They don’t eat their own.

  73. #711684
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:48 am, Storm Chaser said:

    N.O.W. and the other feminists proved what they are during the Clinton administration. Their price is negotiable.

    We ought not insult Neanderthals by comparing such emotionally crippled men and women to a race of people who prospered for thousands of generations.

  74. #711686
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 am, mattymatt10 said:

    Wow. It’s not often I read something, and cringe the entire way through.

    There’s no way a classic, red-blooded American male could find anything to hate about Mary Katherine Ham (or any of the other ladies). She sets my heart all a-twitter.

    Playboy is insufferable. At least Flynt is honest about how he makes his money, and doesn’t try to hide behind the “articles.”

  75. #711687
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:52 am, ctmom said:

    This was vulgar, but what else would you expect from the left? I think the bigger point is they couldn’t find 10 attractive women on the left, so in a jealous fit they decided to insult 10 of our finest righty women! ;)

  76. #711688
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:57 am, Paul Revere said:

    I stopped reading Politico when they used astroturfing talking points concerning Gov. Palin’s hacked email.

  77. #711689
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:57 am, John Deaux said:

    They must be using the Clinton dictionary. It doesn’t have an entry for rape, only pre-consentual sex.

  78. #711692
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:08 am, corona said:

    Slimeball L.A. mayor is once again scumbag of the day.

  79. #711693
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:11 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    No, the moron of the day award does not go to the Playboy.com

    I thought you meant lgm.

  80. #711696
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:16 am, Socky said:

    Slimeball L.A. mayor is once again scumbag of the day.

    Kind of funny how all the big-time supporters of gay marriage are serial adulterers.

  81. #711698
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:28 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    lgm?
    RSS?
    IHMC?

    Time to defend Michelle.

    LOL – I crack myself up. :lol:

    To be honest, the list looks like the top 10 best women on the planet to me but it is missing one small thing:

    Mrs. Soap.

  82. #711700
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:31 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Very sorry about this Michelle.
    Never heard HF term before. Sounds like college dormitory talk for people who have no sex life.
    I’ll be watching FNC today to see if anything is mentioned about one of their own being threatened this way.
    I’d be shocked if no charges or suit is brought against playboy.com and even politico etc.
    Low Low

  83. #711701
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:31 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 2nd, 2009 at 8:57 am, John Deaux said:
    They must be using the Clinton dictionary. It doesn’t have an entry for rape, only pre-consentual sex.

    …right up there with oral inappropriate relationship…

  84. #711704
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:37 am, lgm said:

    Taking umbrage at sexism in politics? Where were you when McCain was telling jokes about the relationship between Chelsea Clinton and Janet Reno? What goes around comes around.

  85. #711708
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:40 am, Ragspierre said:

    lgm, put up a source or shut up.

  86. #711709
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:45 am, Cathy B said:

    What a thing to wake up to first thing in the morning…Michelle, I am sorry you have to be exposed to this filth and are being attacked personally..but thank you for exposing the hypocracy of the left. sigh…

  87. #711710
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:46 am, Savage24 said:

    More proof that there are more horses asses then horses.

  88. #711711
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:51 am, IndyRich said:

    It’s such a good thing that the left is SOOOOO tolerant of diversity of views.

    LGM,
    You are not offended with a list of women who should be raped as a punishment for their political views?? What about all of the VPILF remarks aimed at Palin?? etc…

    What if Rush had said that Rosie ODonnell should be raped because she is a big-mouthed liberal in order to shut her up? Or if Sean was calling Hillary a “PILF”?? Or a cartoon showing Obama behind Hillary when she’s on her hands & knees?? You’d be falling all over yourself with righteous indignation.

    Sometimes, I wonder if you are really just making this up to get a bunch of people talking about you. I’m starting to think you will do anything for attention. I don’t see how anyone could possible believe the moronic things you post on a daily basis.

  89. #711714
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:54 am, orlandocajun said:

    After reading that crap, it takes my breath away when liberals refer to conservatives as haters.

    BTW, there aren’t any women on the left who anyone would want to f _ _ k including Ms. Mullins.

    And a question…why do only lefties use their middle names instead of just first and last?

  90. #711715
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:55 am, Jeff said:

    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:37 am, lgm said:

    As usual, you see no problems with incitement of violence toward conservative women. Did McCain use rape as a metaphor ? If the list was of marxists and Michelle Obama was at the top, you would be demanding show-trials with hangings to follow. Hypocrite.

  91. #711716
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:56 am, Ragspierre said:

    lgm, put up a source or AND shut up.

    Corrected myself.

    lgm hasn’t posted anything of substance in days. He’s run for the tall grass every time he does one of these drive-by posts, and is called on his BS.

    Time to just start ignoring him. He needs to go away.

  92. #711717
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:56 am, Jeff said:

    And a question…why do only lefties use their middle names instead of just first and last?

    Harder to trace ?

  93. #711719
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:58 am, Jeff said:

    He’s run for the tall grass every time he does one of these drive-by posts, and is called on his BS.

    Probably, back at Politico adding comment about the sanctity of free speech now.

  94. #711722
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 10:00 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:37 am, lgm said:
    Taking umbrage at sexism in politics? Where were you when McCain was telling jokes about the relationship between Chelsea Clinton and Janet Reno? What goes around comes around.

    What goes around comes around.

    ????????

    Nice to see you taking the high ground once again. So you condone this kind of thing. I am shocked.

    How is it that after what you said on the Tiller thread you are still here? What is the limit to abusing the TOS?

  95. #711725
    On June 2nd, 2009 at 10:03 am, granite said:

    On June 2nd, 2009 at 9:56 am, Ragspierre said:

    lgm hasn’t never posted anything of substance in days.

    There.

    FIFY.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook