Mapping the “climate of hate”

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 3, 2009 09:45 AM

My column today contrasts the White House and media responses to the Tiller murder with their silence on the deadly military recruiter attack. In the latest developments on the recruiter case, more targets were reportedly found on Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad’s computer. Yesterday, investigators said he told them “he would have killed more soldiers had they been in the parking lot.”

Don’t miss the heart-wrenching interview with the father of murdered Pvt. William Long here.

Still no comment from President Obama…

Update: Finally, a White House statement. L-a-m-e.

***

Climate of hate, world of double standards
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

When a right-wing Christian vigilante kills, millions of fingers pull the trigger. When a left-wing Muslim vigilante kills, he kills alone. These are the instantly ossifying narratives in the Sunday shooting death of Kansas late-term abortionist George Tiller versus the Monday shootings of two Arkansas military recruiters.

Tiller’s suspected murderer, Scott Roeder, was white, Christian, anti-government, and anti-abortion. The gunman in the military recruiting center attack, Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad, was black, a Muslim convert, anti-military, and anti-American. Both crimes are despicable, cowardly acts of domestic terrorism. But the disparate treatment of the two brutal cases by both the White House and the media is striking.

President Obama issued a statement condemning “heinous acts of violence” within hours of Tiller’s death. The Justice Department issued its own statement and sent federal marshals to protect abortion clinics. News anchors and headline writers abandoned all qualms about labeling the gunman a terrorist. An almost gleeful excess of mainstream commentary poured forth on the climates of hate and fear created by conservative talk radio, blogs, and Fox News for reporting Tiller’s activities.

By contrast, President Obama was silent about the military recruiter attacks that left 24-year-old Private William Long dead and 18-year-old Private Quinton Ezeagwula gravely wounded. On Tuesday afternoon – more than 24 hours after the attack on the military recruiting center in Little Rock – President Obama held a press conference to announce his pick for Army Secretary. It would have been exactly the right moment to express condolences for the families of the targeted Army recruiters and to condemn heinous acts of violence against our troops.

But President Obama said nothing. The Justice Department was mum. And so were the legions of finger-pointing pundits happily convicting the pro-life movement and every right-leaning writer on the planet of contributing to the murder of George Tiller. Obama’s omission, it should be noted, comes just a few weeks after he failed to mention the Bronx jihadi plot to bomb synagogues and a National Guard airbase during his speech on homeland security.

Why the silence? Politically and religiously-motivated violence, it seems, is only worth lamenting when it demonizes opponents. Which also helps explain why the phrase “lone shooter” is ubiquitous in media coverage of jihadi shooters gone wild – think convicted Jeep Jihadi Mohammed Taheri-Azar at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill or Israel-bashing gunman Naveed Haq who targeted a Seattle Jewish charity or Los Angeles International Airport shooter Hesham Hedayet who opened fire at the El Al Israeli airline ticket counter– but not in cases involving rare acts of anti-abortion violence.

Even Jeffrey Goldberg of the left-leaning Atlantic magazine noticed the double standards. He called attention to a National Public Radio report on the military recruiter attack that failed to mention the religion and anti-military animus of the suspect. Wrote Goldberg: “Why not tell people what is actually happening in the world? We saw this a couple of weeks ago, when the press only gingerly acknowledged that the malevolent though incompetent suspects in the synagogue bombing-conspiracy case in New York were converts to Islam. How is the public served by this kind of silence? The extremist Christian beliefs of George Tiller’s alleged murderer are certainly relevant to that case, and no one in my profession is hesitant to discuss them. Why the hesitancy to talk about the motivations of the man who allegedly killed Pvt. William Long?”

The truth is that the “climate of hate” doesn’t have just one hemisphere. But you won’t hear the Council on American Islamic Relations acknowledging the national security risks of jihadi infiltrators who despise our military and have plotted against our troops from within the ranks – including convicted fragging killer Hasan Akbar and terror plotters Ali Mohamed, Jeffrey Battle, and Semi Osman.

You won’t hear about the escalating war on military recruitment centers on the op-ed pages of the New York Times – from vandalism to obstruction to Molotov cocktail attacks on campus stations across the country; to the shutdown of a Pittsburgh military recruitment office by zealots holding signs that read “Recruiters are Child Predators;” to the prolonged harassment campaign against the Marine recruiting center in Berkeley, where Code Pink protesters called America soldiers assassins; to the bomb blast at the Times Square recruiting center last March.

And you’ll certainly hear little about the most recent left-wing calls to violence by a Playboy magazine writer who published a vulgar list of conservative female writers and commentators he said he’d like to rape (the obscene slang word he used is not printable). The list was hyped by the magazine’s publicity team and light-heartedly promoted by mainstream publications such as Politico.com (founded by Washington Post reporters).

Is it too much to ask the media cartographers in charge of mapping the “climate of hate” to do their jobs with both eyes open?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Obama Quick to Decry Abortionist’s Murder… Why Is He Still Mute on Soldier’s Murder by Black Muslim Terrorist? « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  2. When Did We Fall In Love With Muslim Terrorists? : Conservative Nation
  3. Climate Of Liberal Hate « Vets On The Watch
  4. Condemnations and Crickets (updated) « America Pwn3d
  5. A Stark Contrast Of Opinion | Vancouver Secrets
  6. The Crazy Continues… « Around The Sphere
  7. Barack “Double Standard” Obama « Guided by Stillwater
  8. Hate-F*ckGate [Dan Collins]
  9. Michelle Malkin » Obama condemns Muslim attack on Arkansas Army recruiters…not
  10. Ace of Spades HQ
  11. Muslim Extremist Kills Military Recruiter vs. Abortion Doctor Killed/UPDATE 1 « Trust, But Verify
  12. And Rightly So… » Blog Archive » Some Wednesday Noon Links
  13. BizzyBlog » Lucid Links (060309, Morning)
  14. Obama states that the Constitution was written 20 centuries ago: why political satire and humor is important UPDATE! Brian Williams bows to Barack Obama « Jim Blazsik
  15. The Greenroom » Forum Archive » Confessions of a Fanboy Blogger(Or, Advice to Cool Kid Wannabes)
  16. William Long killed by muslim Carlos Bledsoe aka Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad - HUSSEIN Obama STILL silent! Long’s father speaks | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  17. The Jawa Report
  18. Obama Says U.S. Could Be Considered a Muslim Country « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  19. Maggie's Notebook
  20. First Things — The Anchoress
  21. A Climate of Hate - Caleb’s blog - RedState
  22. The Gilley Educator » Blog Archive » U.S. *not* a Muslim Nation by any Means!
  23. Return the La Jolla Children’s Pool to Human Children « Temple of Mut
  24. A Tale of Two Murders
  25. Politicization of a tragedy: The murder of George Tiller UPDATE! Why no mention of a fallen soldier and shooting by Islamic extremist? « Jim Blazsik
  26. Alphecca » MSM Double Standard
  27. A pair of senseless murders | THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS
  28. Bookworm Room » Obama’s silence about a terrorist plot against the US military on American soil *UPDATED*
  29. Pro-Life Leaders denounce Tiller's murder - Religion and Philosophy - Page 12 - City-Data Forum
  30. Rhymes With Right
  31. Brutally Honest
  32. Michelle Malkin asks: Is an abortionist worth more than a military recruiter? « Wintery Knight Blog
  33. The Father Of Pvt. William Long Speaks | The Rude News
  34. Maggie's Farm
  35. The Silence Is Deafening | Social Debate: Barack and American Politics
  36. Jesus is Lord, A Worshipping Christian’s Blog » Blog Archive » “Climate of Hate, World of Double Standards” by Michelle Malkin
  37. Troubling and Belated: Obama Finally Speaks Out about Murder of Pvt. William Long « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  38. cookiecrumbexpress.com Blog » BO’s kinda guy.
  39. Rally for Troops–Arkansas Pols Invited « America, You Asked For It!
  40. Climate of hate, world of double standards - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
  41. Michelle Malkin » DOJ issues statement “to protect American Muslims;” silent on protecting Americans from jihadists
  42. Pvt. Long vs Dr. Tiller Murders – In Obama-speak « The Lioness
  43. Double standards – MisterRichardson.com
  44. Guilt by Association Only Works in One Direction These Days : The Sundries Shack
  45. Michelle Malkin » Mourning Pvt. Long
  46. JABbering Stooge :: Riiiiiiiiiiiight… :: June :: 2009
  47. Media ignores murdered U.S. soldier « GOODNESS WORLD LIFE BLOG
  48. Michelle Malkin » I killed the Kentucky Census worker — along with every conservative in America

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #101
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 1:29 pm, Jvette said:

    I understand that. My point was that what Mengele did went far beyond simple murder. He performed surgery without anesthesia. He conducted experiments on living human beings that would have made Dr. Frankenstein shudder. He deliberately burned people to see how long it took to progress from 1st to 3rd degree burns. With the slightest research you could find dozens of other examples of things this man did that make the “Saw” movies look tame.

    Are you aware that one method of abortion is the DnC which means that the uterus is dilated and then the baby is dismembered in order to remove it? Prior to the dismemberment, some babies are killed with a solution that results in a manner similar to burning to death. All of this is done without anesthesia for the baby. Partial birth abortion is also done without anesthesia for the baby.

    The methods used to kill babies in the womb are no less heinous than the horrific experiments of Dr. Mengele and any doctor who performs them is not less a monster.

  2. #102
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 1:42 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 11:24 am, lgm said:
    I wish Obama would issue a statement about the Long murder.

    Good lord…is that you lgm?

    Dr. Tiller, may he rest in peace.

    May the cries of 60,000+ babies ring in his ears for all eternity. May he never rest in peace.

  3. #103
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 1:51 pm, SicSemperTyrannus said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 10:38 am, DBNinKY said (#22):

    A class-action lawsuit against the media at-large for malfeasance of their constitutional charge to keep the people informed, doesn’t seem like a far-fetched idea at this point.

    Exactly where is that duty enumerated in the Constitution? I can’t seem to find it in my copy.

  4. #104
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 1:56 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 11:24 am, lgm said:
    I wish Obama would issue a statement about the Long murder.

    Wish in one hand, and c%@* in the other. See which one fills up first.

    But I don’t agree that the hatred that led to Pvt. Long’s murder is somehow worse than the hatred that led to the murder of Dr. Tiller.

    You don’t get it. By his silence, President Obama indicates that the hatred that led to Dr. Tiller’s murder “is somehow worse” than the hatred that led to PVT Long’s murder. For that matter, Dr. Tiller was the sole target of his whacked-out murderer for a specific perceived grievance. Long and Ezeagwula were targeted because they were American soldiers. Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammed told the police that if their had been more soldiers in the parking lot that he’d have shot them, too. If you’d have been there, he wouldn’t have cared that you are one of the empathetic progressives who feel his pain.

    There is no American Muslim organization, saying that Pvt. Long had blood on his hands,…

    I haven’t heard any of them racing to condemn his murder, either.

    …but that’s exactly what Operation Rescue said about Dr. Tiller.

    Hmmm. Abortionist. Blood on hands. Go figure.

    Nobody on any TV station said anything negative about Pvt. Long.

    Most of the MSM has completely ignored his murder.

    Fox hosts have spent hours over the past two days condemning Dr. Tiller, may he rest in peace.

    President Obama has condemned William Long by his silence.

    ECS
    CPT, AR
    US ARMY (Ret.)

  5. #105
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 1:57 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Thank you, Michelle, for spotlighting the blatant double-standard regarding these two tragedies. Many concerned people were aware of where our president’s and the media’s loyalties lie. This is proof. It’s up to the concerned to make sure other people start giving a damn.

  6. #106
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Speakup said:

    Tiller’s suspected murderer, Scott Roeder, was white, Christian, anti-government, and anti-abortion.

    Lets take a page from the liberal playbook.
    With an innate obsession to blame those supposedly responsible for someone elses reprehensible actions, Kathleen Sebelius is who induced Scott Roeder to commit murder!

    Its simple (in liberal terms) if Sebelius had not perverted justice to keep Tiller in the legal death business, Roeder would not have felt compelled to act (progressively of course).

    Naturally, this only applies if the liberals are never to blame switch is turned off.

  7. #107
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 2:04 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Tell me, James, how many of Dr. Tiller’s patients were NOT mutilated and dismembered in D&C abortions without anesthesia while they were alive? Tell me how many babies are horribly burned while alive in Saline abortions? Tell me what was done to alleviate the pain that babies went through in “partial birth abortions he performed?” How can that not be compared to what Mengele did?

    Abortion IS far worse than any make-believe movie you want to compare it too. Abortionists routinely perform these unspeakable tasks more than 1000 times every day for PROFIT!

    You either know nothing about what happens during an abortion or you are being disingenuous.

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, James Felix said:

    How many viable children have been killed by aborting? Millions?

    Many compare the aborted to a holocaust. Unwilling participants in their own deaths.

    I understand that. My point was that what Mengele did went far beyond simple murder. He performed surgery without anesthesia. He conducted experiments on living human beings that would have made Dr. Frankenstein shudder. He deliberately burned people to see how long it took to progress from 1st to 3rd degree burns. With the slightest research you could find dozens of other examples of things this man did that make the “Saw” movies look tame.

    If you want to say an abortionist is a mass-murderer that’s a logically defensible position to take. But to compare an abortionist to Mengele simply doesn’t hold up, and the hyperbole ultimately harms your argument.

  8. #109
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 2:21 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Another case of liberal knee-jerk reaction. Turns out that “gun scare” at Princeton was just four kids rummaging through a dumpster and one found a toy plastic gun and put it in his pocket. While they were walking away, a woman saw the gun and called police who alerted the media and so on…

    File it with “Kindergartener suspended for pointing banana at friend in school yard”. The wacky world of liberals!

  9. #110
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 2:32 pm, nail49 said:

    Exactly where is that duty enumerated in the Constitution? I can’t seem to find it in my copy.

    SST: They have no constitutional mandate to keep people informed. They also don’t have to tell “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”

    Unfortunately, they can hide behind the Constitution and rely upon it to protect their right to publish their tripe.

    However, if they took their job seriously, they would report the facts, all of the facts, and let the readers make informed decisions.

    As it is, they let out only what they want to, in conformance with their liberal slant, and try to shape public opinion.

    Problem is, the sheeple of this country won’t seek the truth and, even if the truth smacked them in the face, they wouldn’t know it anyway. They only want to be entertained and will gladly watch ‘reality’ shows without understanding they are no more real than their sad little fantasies (I understand they used lgm’s picture next to that definition in Webster’s).

  10. #111
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 2:34 pm, Jeff said:

    Courtesy of stratfor :

    However, politics have proved obstructive to all facets of counterterrorism policy. And politics may have been at play in the Muhammad case as well as in other cases involving Black Muslim converts. Several weeks ago, STRATFOR heard from sources that the FBI and other law enforcement organizations had been ordered to “back off” of counterterrorism investigations into the activities of Black Muslim converts. At this point, it is unclear to us if that guidance was given by the White House or the Department of Justice, or if it was promulgated by the agencies themselves, anticipating the wishes of President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder

  11. #112
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Jeff said:
  12. #114
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:02 pm, James Felix said:

    Abortion IS far worse than any make-believe movie you want to compare it too.

    I didn’t compare abortion to movies, make-believe or otherwise.

    You either know nothing about what happens during an abortion or you are being disingenuous.

    And you’re so blinded by your idealogy that you can’t tell when someone’s on your side.

    I’ve said nothing to defend abortion, I’ve said nothing to defend Dr. Tiller’s pracitces.

    What I have said is that by comparing any abortionist to Dr. Mengele you do your cause no good.

    For example, Jvette said this:

    Are you aware that one method of abortion is the DnC which means that the uterus is dilated and then the baby is dismembered in order to remove it? Prior to the dismemberment, some babies are killed with a solution that results in a manner similar to burning to death. All of this is done without anesthesia for the baby. Partial birth abortion is also done without anesthesia for the baby.

    That description (and yes I was aware of it) represents an inarguable fact. As such it has tremendous persuasive power when shared with an open-minded person you’re trying to convince.

    It also proves my point that many abortion practices are so horrific in reality that they require no further elaboration.

    On the other hand, when you say “So-and-so is just like Mengele!” it will make a lot of people simply tune out whatever it is you have to say next. They’ll assume you’re an extremist, reflexively take a position opposite to yours and be much harder to convince.

    Now, if you can point me towards someone you actually brought around to your point of view by comparing them to Nazis or Jack the Ripper I’ll shut up. If you can’t show me such a person though I’ll ask that you at least consider the possibility that I’m right, and that Godwin’s Law exists for a reason.

  13. #120
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:22 pm, bear1909 said:

    The politics of jihad will continue to kill Americans as they use our “religious freedom” law to their advantage.

    I do not expect anything from the Moslem in Chief impostor.

    He made it clear he would “stand with the Muslim people” and didn’t clarify which Muslim people and where….he is a citizen of the world, but not a natural born one of our Nation.

    He will fail if we resist him and his cartel in their efforts to bring down the Nation.

    America is worth the fight. Are you doing enough?

  14. #121
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:26 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    James,

    I picked the “inarguable facts” of surgery without anesthesia, burning and other awful acts precisely because you mentioned them among Mengele’s horrible crimes against humanity. In fact, Dr. Tiller did precisely the same thing to humans as Mengele did.

    If you don’t like the fact that Tiller did largely the same kinds of things as Mengele did that is your problem. That you evidently understand the analogies are comparable and yet recoil at making the analogies then I don’t know what to make of you.

    “Godwin’s Law” really doesn’t apply. I made no mention of Mengele’s political beliefs or motivation for what he did. I only stated that he did it. I compared Tiller (the doctor) to Mengele (the doctor). If you can’t see that then again, it appears to be your problem with facts that is the issue.

  15. #122
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:26 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Just a random thought,

    Tiller conducted Infanticide on an industrial scale and rather than comparing him to someone else, he can now be compared too, much to my everlasting disgust. His actions were much too infamous.

  16. #123
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:33 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    I respectfully wish all the counter abortion supporters would give it a rest. Being so passionately vested in these single (yes, they’re vital — but!) issues are whittling down votes we need in the future if you really want to change the tide! I don’t expect pro-lifers to convert America in our lifetimes, and before then we have far more essential fish to fry to win the hearts and minds of the critical voters we need! The pendulum is atrophying towards the left swing, and it does no good alienating closet abortion fence sitters by making it our central “God themed” issue instead of financial and security which doesn’t rub personal liberties as deeply! Unfortunately most women today backed to a corner admitting it are somewhat pro-abortion to a point so it’s already uphill. We can’t be seen as ramming this single issue down peoples’ throats while we’re still the moral minority! That’s ALL that others will think we’re concerned about! Let’s win the Congress and WH back first — if at all possible — THEN deal with right to life. A wise person knows when to step back to jump ahead!

    Please!!

    James Greenidge
    Queens, NY

  17. #125
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:46 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    James Greenridge,

    Glad to know you are willing to take such a firm stand on key issues such as protecting the life of the unborn.

    Some of us cannot toss away our principles quite so readily though. I for one am not about to just “go away” to please people like you.

  18. #127
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:50 pm, Flyoverman said:

    WarEagle82,

    James Greenridge is Michael Steele’s pen name.

  19. #129
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:15 pm, sbw999 said:

    This shows you one reason why you won’t see much on NBC about the murder of Private Long. This video is posted on Drudge, and shows what a left wing spineless little tool Brian Williams is. Pathetic is as pathetic does.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLYtHHxTTmc

  20. #130
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:31 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Oh, good.

    Speaking of the map of hate in America…

    it seems that Al Sharpton, criminal, race-baiter, murder-inciter par excellance is now the running buddy of THE ONE.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23256.html

    What next…?

  21. #131
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:33 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I wonder how America might have turned out if in 1859 the GOP had simply said:

    I respectfully wish all the counter abolition supporters would give it a rest. Being so passionately vested in these single (yes, they’re vital — but!) issues are whittling down votes we need in the future if you really want to change the tide! I don’t expect abolitionists to convert America in our lifetimes, and before then we have far more essential fish to fry to win the hearts and minds of the critical voters we need! The pendulum is atrophying towards the left swing, and it does no good alienating closet slavery fence sitters by making it our central “God themed” issue instead of financial and security which doesn’t rub personal liberties as deeply! Unfortunately most slave owners today backed to a corner admitting it are somewhat pro-slavery to a point so it’s already uphill. We can’t be seen as ramming this single issue down peoples’ throats while we’re still the moral minority! That’s ALL that others will think we’re concerned about! Let’s win the Congress and WH back first — if at all possible — THEN deal with slavery and freedom. A wise person knows when to step back to jump ahead!

    Please!!

  22. #132
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:52 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:33 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    I wonder how America might have turned out if in 1859 the GOP had simply said:

    Agreed. The same can be said about abortion. While Americans became lazy on the subject, babies died. I am to believe that being lazy on the subject to win fence sitters is a GOOD thing? Not ever going to happen. All other things being equal, I will take the pro-life candiate. Most of the time I will take them anyhow as they tend to have more conservative values to begin with.

  23. #133
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:53 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:33 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I wonder how America might have turned out if in 1859 the GOP had simply said:

    I had never thought of this until I heard this comment a couple weeks ago. The “Law of the Land” after 1857 was “mandated” by the U.S. Supreme Court in its decision regarding Dred Scott.

    Slaves were private property. They had no rights.

    This evil was overtunred how? By another court ruling? Nope…It was overturned by the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 when Abraham Lincoln basically told the Supreme Court to take a hike.

    Oh if we had a President who would emancipate the unborn. After he issued it you could sit and enjoy the TV shot of the blood shooting out of the Head of Planned Parenthoods eyes. ;)

  24. #134
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:50 pm, Flyoverman said:
    WarEagle82,

    James Greenridge is Michael Steele’s pen name.

    Is this true? It explains a lot.

  25. #135
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:57 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Planned Parenthood = Murder for Profit

    Many of these vile people have grown wealthy by murdering babies here and abroad.

    Mengele murdered because of a warped ideology. Abortionists do their evil for money and personal profit. And then the abortionists often turn around and call capitalists and corporations evil, murdering pigs…

  26. #136
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 5:23 pm, Mach1Duck said:

    In reference to the Democrats and Republicans, as an aquatiance of mine once said, “They both feed out of the same trough.” It is approaching the time we, the American citizens, take back country.

  27. #138
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 5:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    WarEagle82: That was pretty much lincolns view.

  28. #139
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 5:40 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:50 pm, Flyoverman said:

    WarEagle82,

    James Greenridge is Michael Steele’s pen name.

    /sarc

    Fixed it. I could not resist, because it read like a Michael Steele comment.

  29. #140
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 5:50 pm, Marc said:

    There is nothing new in the MSM’s treatment of the Dr. Tiller murder and the MSM’s wilful refusal to condemn the murder of two soldiers by a Muslim fanatic. It was only a few weeks that New York Times resident Iran apologist Roger Cohen refused to condemn suicide bombings that killed Israelis. Cohen blasted Israel “for attempting to conflate its dispute with the Palestinians with the global war on terror”. Cohen went on ad nauseum about how suicide bombings against Israelis are somehow less despicable than suicide bombings in his native UK. Fortunately, Mr. Cohen writes in such a boring style that few people pay attention to his lackluster columns (His speaking style is even more boring, if that is possible). But the attitude that killings of Israelis or killings of American soldiers are not really anything more than a reasonable protest is the predominate view at the New York Times and The Guardian.

  30. #141
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 5:50 pm, granite said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:53 pm, Flyoverman said:

    This evil was overtunred how? By another court ruling? Nope…It was overturned by the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 when Abraham Lincoln basically told the Supreme Court to take a hike.

    Lincoln also commanded a large ARMY that could ENFORCE his proclamation against anything any court could say.

    Rags, need I be corrected here?

  31. #144
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:08 pm, Viper1 said:

    Still no comment from President Obama…

    He would actually have to be presidential before he could comment, dont hold your breath, he more than likely could care less.

  32. #145
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:18 pm, DBNinKY said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 1:51 pm, SicSemperTyrannus said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 10:38 am, DBNinKY said (#22):

    Exactly where is that duty enumerated in the Constitution? I can’t seem to find it in my copy.

    And why would the First Amendment call for a “free press,” if not to keep the public informed about the government?

  33. #146
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:25 pm, Dimsdale said:

    I bet Obama (and Holder) would have had something to say if those racist thugs harrassing people at the polls, the New Black Panthers, were gunned down.

    Obambi’s silence is deafening.

  34. #147
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:30 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 11:24 am, lgm said:

    I wish Obama would issue a statement about the Long murder.

    You keep wishing along with that “hope and change…”

    But I don’t agree that the hatred that led to Pvt. Long’s murder is somehow worse than the hatred that led to the murder of Dr. Tiller. There is no American Muslim organization, saying that Pvt. Long had blood on his hands, but that’s exactly what Operation Rescue said about Dr. Tiller.

    And it would be true. That is what it is called when you murder innocents.

    Nobody on any TV station said anything negative about Pvt. Long. Fox hosts have spent hours over the past two days condemning Dr. Tiller, may he rest in peace.

    You mean no liberal TV station (most of them) said anything. Tiller deserved condemnation.

    May he rest in pieces like the fetuses he routinely and callously dismembered.

  35. #148
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:36 pm, teachem2 said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 5:50 pm, granite said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:53 pm, Flyoverman said:

    This evil was overtunred how? By another court ruling? Nope…It was overturned by the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 when Abraham Lincoln basically told the Supreme Court to take a hike.

    Lincoln also commanded a large ARMY that could ENFORCE his proclamation against anything any court could say.

    I know this is OT, but actually the Emancipation Proclamation was an executive order Lincoln issued as CIC of the Army and Navy. It was basically a military proclamation and was nonbinding on many slave states. What was important about it is that slaves that did escape and were able to make it to an army camp were considered free. There were lots of these camps and they have some great photos at the Library of Congress website. I was priviledged enough to be invited to the Lincoln symposium @ the LOC back in March and learned quite a bit.

  36. #149
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:36 pm, dj said:

    Still no comment from President Obama…

    He’s too busy filming a spoof interview with NBC for the Tonight Show. From Drudge:

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/the-tonight-show-with-president-obama/

  37. #150
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:44 pm, Tuesday said:

    So, with Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad’s computer’s files/info and his “he would have killed more soldiers had they been in the parking lot” comment he is innocent – according to his lawyer. Heh!

    Obama, as I predicted, will not condemn the killer. He is his brother, after all!

    What was it Obama said about his honoring the troops “unlike his predecessor”??? Gag!

  38. #151
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:44 pm, teachem2 said:

    He’s too busy filming a spoof interview with NBC for the Tonight Show. From Drudge:

    Why does that not surprise me?

  39. #152
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:45 pm, Jeddite said:

    Excellent column, Michelle.

    Condolences to the Long family and a speedy recover to Private Ezeagwula.

  40. #153
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 6:47 pm, dj said:

    Obama, as I predicted, will not condemn the killer. He is his brother, after all!

    Didn’t he write in one of his books, that he would stand on the side of Islam? The one and only time he didn’t lie.

  41. #154
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 7:39 pm, DiamondMair said:

    EXCUSE ME?!?!?!
    Check out the link below – but don’t bother trying to sign up – THIS is VERY prominently displayed …………………….

    “Please Complete the Following Enrollment Form:

    “This service is not available in the United States”

    “Truth” and “Transparency”, my aching a$$!!!

    Link. Nevermind that he’s currently bragging about his Muslim roots – but WE are not to question where his loyalties lie?

    Lying sacks of fecal matter ………………….

    Semper Fi’
    DM

  42. #155
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 8:17 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    I don’t know which is worse, that there was no comment from Obama OR that what they are saying now is there will be a statement but it is being prepared.

    So why does one need a “prepared” statement in this kind of situation if it isn’t going to be totally political?

    It is clear the anti-military sentiment, the pro-Islam or fear of Islam, the pro-abortion bias all added up to produce the severe disparity in coverage.

    Disgusting.

    But no surprising.

  43. #156
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 9:01 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Lincoln also commanded a large ARMY that could ENFORCE his proclamation against anything any court could say.

    Rags, need I be corrected here?

    Sorry, I was working. Lincoln, as I understand the story, actually countermanded the first emancipation proclamation, which was issued by Charles Freemont. Freemont was a truly fascinating character in our national history. Anyhow, Freemont issued an emancipation order in that part of the territory he was charged with holding. Lincoln was appalled at the implications of that kind of move, and had it reversed.

    Lincoln was not impeded too much by the Constitution, as many of us know. The Supreme Court was not about to get in his way in his drive to preserve the Union. But, for Lincoln, the freedom of the slaves was a secondary matter.

  44. #157
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 9:15 pm, prendad said:

    Still waiting for a comment from our President about the murder of one of our young soldiers shot dead in Arkansas by a Muslim convert. HELLO, HELLO MR. PRESIDENT, EARTH CALLING OBAMA, COME IN PLEASE. . . .

  45. #158
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 9:16 pm, prendad said:

    GEE, I GUESS HE IS BUSY CARRESSING HIS GOLD NECKLACE BLING THAT SAUDI ARABIA GAVE HIM.

  46. #159
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 9:17 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    Mapping the “climate of hate”

    Where is global climate change when you really need it?

  47. #161
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 9:53 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 9:01 pm, Ragspierre said:

    …for Lincoln, the freedom of the slaves was a secondary matter.

    The freedom of the slaves was a central matter for Lincoln, long before he became President. Have you studied what Lincoln said about slavery during the Lincoln-Douglas debates?

  48. #163
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 10:35 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The freedom of the slaves was a central matter for Lincoln, long before he became President. Have you studied what Lincoln said about slavery during the Lincoln-Douglas debates?

    Sure. Have you reconciled what I related, and the fact that the Emancipation Proclamation was very selective in the states that it effected?

    Look, there are a LOT of myths about Abe. He was a consummate politician, and a lot of stuff done by his friends was pure cronyism. The term “shoddy” was coined during the Civil War, as I understand, to describe the quality of material supplied to Union troops by FOAs.

    The facts don’t refute his great deeds. They just demystify the man.

  49. #165
    On June 3rd, 2009 at 11:46 pm, jangar said:

    When a right-wing Christian vigilante kills, millions of fingers pull the trigger. When a left-wing Muslim vigilante kills, he kills alone.

    It really does depend on an individual’s world view as to what registers on their radar as important, and how to understand it. Clearly we have a culture that has a different world view than that of the conservative mind.

    The same culture gave us a President Obama.

  50. #167
    On June 4th, 2009 at 5:43 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 3:50 pm, Flyoverman said:

    WarEagle82,

    James Greenridge is Michael Steele’s pen name.

    This is a LOW blow. People have a bad habit of kicking allies in the plexus for telling them that their gameplan is faulty. Many many more of the millions unborn you care about will die ad infinitum if this country permanently takes a socialist/left turn — which it’s gradually in the process of becoming. If you want to call it sacrificing millions of unborn in the meanwhile of fixing this to prevent such a catastrophe later, so be it. One-track passions can blind and take your eye off what needs to be done to achieve a beneficial political goal — even if yours is not squarely in the sights, and it won’t help the unborn squat by turning people whose sympathies and votes you need OFF just from a single issue. It makes us look like zealot nuts — and who wants to follow such? Society dropped the ball by simply chuckling at permissive attitudes and now we’re reaping the amoral mess. When you have the majority of high school and college students shrugging at the idea of abortion and gay prom queens and gutter rap speak, you are in deep uphill moral doo-doo that will take generations to reverse even if you started now with God-knows what carrot. I DO know that shoving single issues like abortion in peoples faces without converting their hearts and minds first is extremely counterproductive. That’s no theory. I’ve lived it. A prevailing pro-life mind-set is always better than Nazi-like imposed bans, and that’s where pro-lifers should start; hit those schools and campuses and start converting the unwashed so you later DON’T have to battle in the streets for hollow rootless legal “victories”.

    All I can say is protests feel good but sowing heartfelt ballots most matters.

    James Greenidge
    Queens, NY

  51. #169
    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:01 am, Patronedheart said:

    Well summarized, JamieD! :D
    And I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting fo the left to figure that one out.

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 12:54 pm, JamieD said:
    Patroned Heart said:
    Comparing this and the abortion dr. is like comparing apples and oranges. While both are acts of terrorism, and the persons responsible should hanged in public IMHO, one was commited out of a need to avenge the destruction of innocent babies, and the other was committed out of a need to destroy America.
    I see one as being a result of hatred towards a protector of the innocent and the other a result of hatred towards the guilty.

    Ok, all you blind leftists, figure out which one is which!

  52. #170
    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:13 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    jamesgreenidge said:

    … it does no good alienating closet abortion fence sitters …

    Well, if they’re sitting on the fence, what makes YOU so certain which side they’ll fall off when pushed? Huh? Basically your whole post says to me that money and politics is more important to you than the chance for life itself.

    I was adopted at birth so I can share something personal about having that chance. By shear luck I encountered the obstetrician who delivered me back in the early 50’s when he was stone drunk; in vino veritas. He spilled two pieces of information about my bio-mom that I’m certain he would not have otherwise – she was “un-wed” and she was “very young”.

    Yes, she certainly fit the profile of a woman who would have considered finding a doctor to perform a back-room abortion but, obviously she did not. Considering that abortions were as illegal as armed robbery back then, did she choose to have me because of the law or because she cared about my life?

    I do not know the answer to that and either do you but ask me if I really care to know the truth versus comfortably assuming the latter? One thing is for certain, for one reason or the other, here I am!

    Here I am while millions of MY slain brothers and sisters were denied the chance be here to reply to messages from people like you. If they were somehow able to reply to you, what do YOU think they would have to say about sacrificing THEIR chance at life for the purpose of political expediency? How would ANYONE react to the idea that their very LIFE was expendable for a political party?

    Well they are not here, they are not able to reply to you, so, even if I am the only person to do so – I speak for them. But, in God’s eye, there is no reason on this earth that we should not ALL speak for them ….including YOU.

  53. #172
    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:31 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    jamesgreenidge: A prevailing pro-life mind-set is always better than Nazi-like imposed bans, and that’s where pro-lifers should start; hit those schools and campuses and start converting the unwashed so you later DON’T have to battle in the streets for hollow rootless legal “victories”.

    How ’bout we first test the waters of that idea by proselytizing the virtues of honesty followed by legalizing theft to see how things turn out? Hey, it’s only a test of your theory and nobody gets killed finding out if it works or not.

  54. #173
    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:38 am, granite said:

    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:31 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    jamesgreenidge: A prevailing pro-life mind-set is always better than Nazi-like imposed bans, and that’s where pro-lifers should start; hit those schools and campuses and start converting the unwashed so you later DON’T have to battle in the streets for hollow rootless legal “victories”.

    How ’bout we first test the waters of that idea by proselytizing the virtues of honesty followed by legalizing theft to see how things turn out? Hey, it’s only a test of your theory and nobody gets killed finding out if it works or not.

    Interesting point, DWD!
    Kudos to you!

  55. #174
    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:45 am, Ragspierre said:

    On June 3rd, 2009 at 4:08 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    nail49 said:

    Sounds like you want those who disagree with you to be shipped off to the gulags.

    You know what?

    That’s a good idea – send all of the bigots, idiots, liars, glue sniffers and anyone who voted for George Bush off to a gulag.

    From the John Yoo thread. Our own dirt-clod on the map of hate.

    Really, what is the contribution of something like this?

  56. #175
    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:57 am, b-cat said:

    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:45 am, Ragspierre said:

    I called ILMC on being a race baiter. I guess now it wants to just be a plain ol’ Communist.

  57. #176
    On June 4th, 2009 at 9:06 am, Ragspierre said:

    All connection to reason and equanimity seems to have left poor ILOVEMYCUBA. She’s just a hater, seems to me.

  58. #177
    On June 4th, 2009 at 9:07 am, katablog said:

    #124 – I’d be shocked except truthfully, nothing shocks me much since Jan. 20th, 2009. Notice who pays for this “service” to “Citizens of the World”. I guess “We the People” (now known as “We who pick up the tab”) failed the “Citizens of the World” test.

  59. #178
    On June 4th, 2009 at 9:07 am, Lindsay said:

    Great column, Michelle.

  60. #179
    On June 4th, 2009 at 9:22 am, nail49 said:

    Really, what is the contribution of something like this?

    Rags: Just shows us the level of discourse by IHateMyself and its ilk.

  61. #180
    On June 4th, 2009 at 9:26 am, granite said:

    On June 4th, 2009 at 8:45 am, Ragspierre said:

    Really, what is the contribution of something like this?

    I suppose it is not a bad thing that our domestic enemies put themselves into clear focus….

  62. #181
    On June 4th, 2009 at 10:29 am, Ragspierre said:

    Don’t get me wrong…I LOVE forensic argument. I HOPE to engage with people who disagree.

    But a bomb-thrower who just does drive-by posts that really say nothing but, “You suck, I hate you, die” serves no real purpose on a thread. We all know that’s a common moonbat feeling, and anyone here could predict what they’ll say.

  63. #182
    On June 4th, 2009 at 11:36 am, DBNinKY said:

    Really, what is the contribution of something like this?

    I agree – commenters like that contribute nothing and detract from MM’s hard work at presenting us with informative lead reports.

    Rage with a keyboard has no place on any blog: people who exhibit this behavior are just too emotional charged with negativity to engage in reasoned argument and persuasive dialog.

  64. #192
    On June 9th, 2009 at 11:15 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    Tuesday 9 June–0900 MST. Laura Ingraham has Private William Long’s father–Daris Long–on for an interview.
    ***
    Pvt. Long’s dad–Marine Corp. Veteran–and his family are a real patriotic group. Despite the loss of a fine son–his strength, courage, and love for the U.S.A. come shining through their grief.
    ***
    May God bless and comfort them all. Here is what real service to our country looks like. Not like “community organizing”.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MLK, Black History Month, and Cuisine Correctness

February 4, 2010 04:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

168 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

Courting Disaster hits #9 on NYTimes best-seller list

February 4, 2010 09:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Lady Qaeda found guilty, blames Israel

February 3, 2010 07:12 PM by Michelle Malkin

47 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Video: The confession of KSM

February 3, 2010 11:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“From A to Z.”

Tonight on C-SPAN: Exposing the Fort Hood cover-up

February 2, 2010 05:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Thank you, Tim Tebow

January 29, 2010 01:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Cirque du Jihad: Coming to a federal court near you?

January 29, 2010 03:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Retreat: White House plays jihadi musical chairs

January 28, 2010 09:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Britain’s new anti-terrorism plan: Bribes for Bombers!

January 28, 2010 12:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Mo’ money.


Categories: Abortion, Double standards, Islam



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook