DOJ issues statement “to protect American Muslims;” silent on protecting Americans from jihadists

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 5, 2009 11:14 AM

You will be fascinated — among other reactions — by the latest statement issued by the Obama DOJ, issued yesterday after the president’s Cairo speech.

No, it’s not a statement condemning the jihadist in Arkansas who targeted our troops or the Bronx jihadi plotters who targeted Jews, infidels, and our troops.

It’s a statement “to protect American Muslims.”

Read it (hat tip – LaShawn Barber):

Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder on Department of Justice’s Outreach and Enforcement Efforts to Protect American Muslims

Thursday, June 4, 2009

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder released the following statement relating to President Obama’s historic speech today in Cairo, Egypt:

“The President’s pledge for a new beginning between the United States and the Muslim community takes root here in the Justice Department where we are committed to using criminal and civil rights laws to protect Muslim Americans. A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

“There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear – to pit our national security against our civil liberties – but that is a false choice. We have a solemn responsibility to protect our people while we also protect our principles.”

Meanwhile, this:

The FBI confirmed Wednesday it was investigating the possibility an Atlanta Jewish site was among other planned targets of a Muslim convert accused of killing a soldier outside a Conway, Ark., recruiting center this week.

Stephen Emmett, spokesman for the Atlanta FBI office, said the investigation into the shooting turned up evidence to suggest Abdulhakim Muhammad, 23, of Little Rock, had plans for a “Jewish entity” in Atlanta. The Associated Press reported memos from the investigation showed Little Rock, as well as New York, Philadelphia, Louisville, Ky., and Memphis, were also on his list.

Emmett declined to say what specific site in Atlanta might have been in Muhammad’s plans, but “precautions were taken [in Atlanta] because of the serious nature of the Little Rock” shooting.

And this: “The man accused of fatally shooting a soldier outside a recruiting center begged for FBI agents to free him from a Yemeni jail where he was ‘radicalized’ by Islamic terrorists, his lawyer told The Associated Press on Thursday. Lawyer Jim Hensley described Abdulhakim Muhammad as an impressionable youth driven to public service in an impoverished Middle Eastern country. But teachings by ‘hardened’ terrorists in Yemen and experiences with Afghan child refugees who were missing limbs drove him to become someone his parents didn’t recognize, Hensley said.”

And one more very interesting post you should read: An investigation by Blue Collar Republican into the Mephis mosque and imam under which the Arkansas jihadi shooter Abdulhakim Muhammad studied/worshiped.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:20 am, ajmontana said:

    A good friend recently told me the world is “upside down” 100% accurate, and it’s getting difficult to walk on my hands.

  2. #2
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:23 am, stillontheroad said:

    I am looking at this statement and I just cannot believe what I am seeing. After the Arkansas incident, I just cannot believe it.

  3. #3
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:23 am, sonofdy said:

    AMAZING….

    So the victims are the bad guys.

    LGM will blame Bush in 10… 9… 8…

  4. #4
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:26 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I guess if I want protection, I’m going to have to convert. Nope. Giddyup!

  5. #5
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:27 am, Kahuna said:

    This stuff reminds me of Bizzaro world.

  6. #6
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:28 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    I learned all I need to know about “peaceful” Islam on 9/11/2001. Remember our citizens leaping to their deaths from the twin towers instead of burning alive. Remember the “high fives” in Gaza when these videos played on Arab T.V. Recognize and engage your enemies.
    ***
    I used to think that people who thought our government was working against the American people were stupid or crazy. I used to think that most of our government departments, congress, and judiciary were staffed by mostly competent people working in our best interests. I used to think that the “small minority” of bad apples were SELF ENRICHING, STUPID, DISHONEST, or NAIVE.
    ***
    My opinion has changed in the last 5 years. I now see more than half of our government as TRAITORS as they implement their “democratic” / liberal / socialist / marxist / communist agenda for the new U.S.S.A.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  7. #7
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:28 am, vickisoup said:

    The BHO administration is emboldened by the silence of the American people. As our comrade in chief declares us a “Muslim nation” and not a “Christian nation”, who besides Michelle is willing to do the heavy lifting to call him to account? The administration is increasingly anti-American and the silence from the GOP leaders (oxymoron, I realize) is deafening. Lord, hasten your return!

  8. #8
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:36 am, walterc said:

    “The President’s pledge for a new beginning between the United States and the Muslim community takes root here in the Justice Department where we are committed to using criminal and civil rights laws to protect Muslim all Americans. A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms including the right to change religions without fear of death, and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    That’s how it should read Mr attorney General.

  9. #9
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:36 am, happyscrapper said:

    Although more than half the voters decided to vote for a black supremicist, Chicago mafia-thug who pledged to change this country into a marxist regime, I still have hope that a large portion of those idiots are now having buyer’s remorse and will choose differently next time…if there is a next time. I think that there will be one more chance to save the country, thanks to people like MM, Rush, Beck, etc. If we can continue to expose the treason of this administration before they turn loose the brownshirts, we may have a chance.

  10. #10
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:38 am, hunter said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    Except for those in the military protecting the rights of the idiots making these decisions. Right Holder?

  11. #11
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:43 am, MBuck said:

    Way I see it, relying on the law to serve and protect those of us who are struggling to do the right thing is going to become exceedingly dangerous.

  12. #12
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:44 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms (except for Christians) and other fundamental rights (except for 2nd Amendment rights) of all of our fellow citizens (and undocumented citizens) in the workplace, in the housing market (unless you bought within your means), in our schools (unless you believe lessons should be taught in English) and in the voting booth (as long as you vote D).

    sigh…

  13. #13
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:44 am, stillontheroad said:

    I see a mini series in real time called ” Morph the United States” staring every Liberal Door Knob in America.

  14. #14
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:45 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    Obama better not even THINK of proposing that Sharia Law be integrated with our justice system.

  15. #15
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:46 am, WarEagle82 said:

    Funny, but I don’t know a single Muslim that has been murdered by a non-Muslim because they were Muslims. I know of Muslims who were murdered by other Muslims. And I can name the names of 7 Christian friends who have been murdered by Muslims because they were Christians.

    Why does the myth of Muslim persecution persist in the MSM and halls our our abjectly dysfunctional, inept, corrupt, non-representative government?

  16. #16
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:46 am, xler8bmw said:

    This proves it this country has finally lost it’s common sense!

    I will be opening a business of designer Burkas sold cheap because of the taxes I will have to pay to start a small business. If anyone knows any illegal aliens out of work during the recession and they can sew please have them send their resume’s or fake documentation to:

    We Give Up You Win
    1600 Mexico Avenue
    Once Was Washington, DC 00000
    C/O Communist States of America

  17. #17
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:47 am, Ragspierre said:

    Note the same “false choice” meme used by THE ONE.

    The fact is that the tension between effective national security policy and civil liberties has ALWAYS been a very TRUE choice, and has been debated since the Founding.

    Calling it a “false choice” is simply a lie.

    It is designed to shut down the debate. It is designed to rhetorically put the maker of the statement above the fray.

    THAT IS ALSO A LIE. THE ONE is just a very, very flawed human being.

  18. #18
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:54 am, conservative in europe said:

    Rocketman,

    Remember the “high fives” in Gaza when these videos played on Arab T.V. Recognize and engage your enemies.

    Lets all remember the “high fives” and dancing in the street in New Jersey after 9/11 that the MSM censored for fear it might lead to reprisals..

    The liberal translation for DOJ’s statement: “Oh, look how magnanimous we are! They will be our friends and hold our hands. This will prove that Booooosh was wrong!” (Followed by euphoric self-back patting).

    Muslim translation: “We have allowed the Americans to defeat themselves. They are ripe for the picking.” (Followed by a sly grin).

    I have found the enemy and he is us.

    True. Oh so true.

  19. #19
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:57 am, Just A Grunt said:

    Here in Atlanta we have our own little jihadi on trial.

  20. #20
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, Tagwife said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:45 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    Obama better not even THINK of proposing that Sharia Law be integrated with our justice system.

    I figure this is next, some form will be introduced.

  21. #21
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:05 pm, DagneyT said:

    With every passing day since BO took office, I am having more and more trouble recognizing my country!

    His appointment of David Hamilton to a circuit court is far more disturbing to me than Sonia Sotomayor! Mr. Hamilton thinks it is wrong to use the name “Jesus”, but “Allah” is totally fine!

  22. #22
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:07 pm, Kalifornia Kafir said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    But some Black Panther can stand outside my polling place with a pipe, call me a cracker and not be investigated? Oh, I forgot… I’m a white Christian. I have no rights in the Obama Nation. I’ve officially become a Dhimmi, a second class citizen in my own land.

  23. #23
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Tagwife said:
    Hasn’t some form of this already been implemented for loans?

  24. #24
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:09 pm, William Teach said:

    And liberals wonder why the sale of handguns is still strong 7 months after the 2008 election day?

    Where are all these put upon Mooslims (presidents pronunciation, not mine)? Having trouble finding stories about them. Perhaps Obambi could point them out for us.

  25. #25
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, Tagwife said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Tagwife said:
    Hasn’t some form of this already been implemented for loan

    Most likely, I haven’t applied for any loans lately tho. Trying to get out of dept not in more :)

  26. #26
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, chep said:

    How about just protecting United States Citizens regardless of religion or race? Is that such a hard concept? Why do we have to cater to religion and race?

    Napolitano = Stupid

  27. #27
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, nbarry said:

    Holder said nothing about protecting the rights of Muslim women and girls against honor killings and other sexist abuses, didn’t he?

  28. #28
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, tre said:

    One soldier was killed and another wounded by a muslime in Little Rock, and this idiot STILL thinks it’s the MUSLIMS who need protection?!?!

    How in the world did this fool get elected?

  29. #29
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:35 pm, James Felix said:

    The BHO administration is emboldened by the silence of the American people. As our comrade in chief declares us a “Muslim nation” and not a “Christian nation”…

    Athiests tend to froth at the mouth when someone suggests America is a Christian Nation (as an athiest myself I feel some sympathy for them but I hardly think it’s worth getting all worked up over).

    Where are they now? Where is the ACLU? Where are all the church/state separation absolutists?

    The idea that America is in any way a Muslim nation is offensive. It’s obscene. The tenets of Islam are absolutely incompatable with our traditons of freedom and equality under the law. Even as diplomatic boilerplate, as a kind of “ich bin ein Berliner” statement, it’s enough to make my skin crawl.

    I can only hope all the libertarians and squishy conservatives who voted this clown into office are paying attention and preparing their 2012 vote accordingly.

  30. #30
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:35 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I would like to see the following:

    1) A list of examples from the DOJ of actual things that have occurred to Muslims in the U.S. in 2002.

    2) A comparison of violent acts against Muslims in the U.S. compared to the the number of acts of Muslim to Muslim violence and Muslim to non-Muslim violence in the U.S. since Sepember 11, 2001.

  31. #31
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:36 pm, James Felix said:

    Where are all these put upon Mooslims (presidents pronunciation, not mine)? Having trouble finding stories about them.

    Because there aren’t any. Muslims are overwhelming the perpetrators of bias crimes, not the victims of them.

  32. #32
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:40 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Oh, but you see, according to Obama, we’re one of the largest muslim nations!

  33. #33
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:40 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    “……begged for FBI agents to free him from a Yemeni jail where he was ‘radicalized’ by Islamic terrorists, his lawyer told The Associated Press”

    Did not take long at all for the “he’s a victim” B.S. to surface.

  34. #34
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:44 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    happyscrapper. While many indeed may be starting to feel “buyers remorse”, it may take longer to turn things around. Many will go a long long way before admitting that they made a huge mistake.

  35. #35
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:45 pm, love2rumba said:

    AMAZING….

    So the victims are the bad guys.

    This has been the meme for a generation of gun control activists, for example.

    If someomne tried to attack you with lethal force ability, opportunity, and jeopardy and you shot him/her..The attack was somehow your fault according to them (and because you had a gun, in their minds, the probability that this was so soars in their minds).

    …Unless, of course, you are a prominent liberal, (like former Washington Post reporter, Carl Rowan), then they will look the other way…

    I hate to say this, but it would now no longer surprise me, to find the new DOJ meddling in otherwise clearcut self-defense cases, because the perp was not white, or the defender was a prominent conservative.

  36. #36
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, PhredE said:

    chep wrote:

    “How about just protecting United States Citizens regardless of religion or race? Is that such a hard concept? Why do we have to cater to religion and race?”

    In the eyes of the multiculturalist (eg. Holder & co.), only those that have an associated subgroup identity are ‘worthy’ of protection. If you don’t have any ‘special’ identity you simply don’t count or aren’t worthy of protection.

    In other words, the multiculturalist believes that all Americans (ie. US Citizens) are equal, but some Americans need to be more equal than others.

  37. #37
    On June 5th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, letget said:

    The sign I have on front door that says ‘I will not submit’. I will use my ‘means’ by the 2nd amendment to not submit. It is looking with hourly news bho and team does not want to protect but a select few in our nation.
    BTW: I will have my head whopped off before I become a rop and the ‘a’ thing.
    L

  38. #38
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:10 pm, deepdiver said:

    This administration really scares me. Not only are they fascists (real fascists by definition not just called that in a leftist knee-jerk reaction like the left did to Bush for 8 years) but they are almost all northern and northeastern urbanites who have not a clue as to the thoughts, feelings, concepts or perspectives of about half the country who live in rural areas or in “fly over” country. I am truly concerned that they will do something stupid to incite an incident that will make Waco look like far less dramatic than Ruby Ridge in comparison. And if that happens in this environment it could be the spark on the powder keg and become an irreversible, life changing event for every American for generations.

    He and his administration are just that incompetent and tone deaf. They just keep pushing and pushing and separating and dividing. I have heard more racist comments relating to Obama, his administration or those he is turning into protected classes (eg hispanic illegals and muslims) than I have heard in total probably in my entire life (aside from that in rap music I was unwillingly subjected to in college). A truly divisive man and administration.

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    Well, obviously a large segment of Americans continue to vehemently exercise their 2nd amendment right which is a fundamental right (along with the companion right to self-defense) according to our founding fathers. And many of us, especially conservatives, believe that all men and women were created equal and the sooner we get on about making our laws reflect that with no more privilege for anyone nor protected classes, the sooner we can get on with focusing on being Americans instead of the hyphenated Americans the dems strangely prefer.

  39. #39
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    Hi again CONSERVATIVE IN EUROPE–#18. Good analysis of what happened. I didn’t think there were many conservatives left in Europe–what country do you live in?
    ***
    Winston Churchill seemed to be the last real conservative there–he saw the “handwriting on the wall” while most other people tried to appease the Nazis.
    ***
    Some of the newly free previously Communist countries seem to have a more conservative view than the older countries. The U.S.A. seems more liberal all the time to a 68 year old White Christian ex Army draftee like me.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  40. #40
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, Hangfire said:

    I cry for my grandchildren, who will grow up not knowing the joys I had in my youth.

  41. #41
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Regulus said:

    Lawyer Jim Hensley described Abdulhakim Muhammad as an impressionable youth driven to public service in an impoverished Middle Eastern country. But teachings by ‘hardened’ terrorists in Yemen and experiences with Afghan child refugees who were missing limbs drove him to become someone his parents didn’t recognize, Hensley said.”

    Reading a whopper like that reminds me of why I’m not practicing law anymore. I’d have either busted out laughing before I could finish the sentence, or would’ve had to excuse myself so I could go compose my letter of resignation from the bar.

    “There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear – to pit our national security against our civil liberties – but that is a false choice.

    Not sure whether to laugh or spit when I read that: using a straw man to rail against an apocryphal false dilemma. Two logical fallacies for the price of one! How long was Holder lying awake last night, staring at the ceiling before he came up with that bit of inspiration…?

  42. #42
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:29 pm, DBNinKY said:

    “But teachings by ‘hardened’ terrorists in Yemen… .”

    Haven’t you been listening to the Left? There are no “hardened terrorists,” only hard-headed Americans who refuse to abandon Israel.

  43. #43
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, MrOlympia said:

    It just gets more bizarre everyday with this POTUS and his thugocracy.

    Is civil/racial/idiological unrest the goal of this POTUS? It dang sure must be and it WILL happen as this keeps up. He knows this……another reason for the creation of his “civilian army.”

    SMH! (Shakin My Head)

  44. #44
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:26 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I guess if I want protection, I’m going to have to convert. Nope. Giddyup!

    Personally I am quite capable of takng care of myself. I’d rather do that than wade through airport “security” again. I can assure you, that did not make me feel safe. Only castrated. We, once the land of the free, giving it all away for some vague and lofty promise of safety.

    I can’t decide who to hate more.

  45. #45
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm, jjmurphy said:

    Flyoverman said:

    I would like to see the following:

    1) A list of examples from the DOJ of actual things that have occurred to Muslims in the U.S. in 2002.

    2) A comparison of violent acts against Muslims in the U.S. compared to the the number of acts of Muslim to Muslim violence and Muslim to non-Muslim violence in the U.S. since Sepember 11, 2001.

    Flyoverman – Dead on!!! So good I thought people should see it twice. Yes, let us see this evidence. We won’t, of course, because it doesn’t exist.

  46. #46
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:40 pm, bear1909 said:

    So the robust enforcement of freedom of religion means the 10 commandments get to go back up on the Alabama courthouse, the crucifixes get to go back on the city shields from whence they’ve been removed, kosher menus will be made available in public schools on High Holy Days, and school prayer is back in?

    Get ready for more accomodations for the Followers of Islam in the public institutions of our Country.

    Islam will never compromise. But why would the Followers of Islam have to when the Shuffling Twins are kowtowing to this world-wide Brigade of Death.

    And watch how Sharia will creep into our Civil Rights Legal Code…. say goodbye to equal protection under the law.

    “My religion says it is my duty to kill Jews. You discriminate against me if I cant kill Jews.”

    Pish.

    Ramming it home to America in 5…4….3…2….1

    Bear1909 out.

  47. #47
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:40 pm, Hangfire said:

    Why is it necessary for the Department of Justice to protect Muslims?

    I thought that the Secret Service protected the President?

  48. #48
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:43 pm, bear1909 said:

    Hangfire:

    2 funny!!!! :D You are now officially on the DHS list too LMAO

  49. #49
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:45 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Is civil/racial/idiological unrest the goal of this POTUS? It dang sure must be and it WILL happen as this keeps up. He knows this……another reason for the creation of his “civilian army.”

    Civil unrest probably isn’t a goal itself, but could certainly be a means to achieve the ultimate goal of permanent power and control.

  50. #50
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Many of us tried to warn y’all that he’s a muslim through and through, but NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! We couldn’t say that because our side is more dignified than that.

  51. #51
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Didn’t an American soldier just shoot two Muslims on a street in a town in Arkansas? Didn’t several American soldiers in New Jersey just get arrested for planning an attack on a peace-loving Muslim place of worship?

    It is about time that the DOJ extends some protection to these poor, misunderstood and often maligned practitioners of the religion of peace.

    I swear, these are the headlines they think they read inside the Obama/Holder DOJ…

  52. #52
    On June 5th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, rambler said:

    No matter how they slice it, it seems that there are NO moderate muslims. If there were, we’d see outrage directed against the terrorists and other islamic thugs. Muslims keep pointing to Tim McVey as a home grown nut. There was only one Tim McVey. We don’t sent out nuts to bomb islamic countries. We don’t have christian converts shooting up mosques.

  53. #53
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, Flyoverman said:

    “There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear – to pit our national security against our civil liberties – but that is a false choice. We have a solemn responsibility to protect our people while we also protect our principles.”

    Dear Department of Justice,

    Just wanted to let you know regarding the last sentence of your press release that when you do not protect ALL of your people, rest assured those you choose not to protect have the motivation and the means to protect themselves.

    The right of self-defense is nrever denied.

  54. #54
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Ironically, the Obama/Holder clique are absolutely convinced that the violence in Iraq is perpetrated by deranged, fanatic Chaldean Christians, armed and supported by the evil Bush, that are persecuting the Muslim minority.

    Of course, these geniuses are also convinced that Israeli towns keep jumping in front of Hamas-launched rockets just to provoke Hamas…

  55. #55
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Kalifornia Kafir said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    But some Black Panther can stand outside my polling place with a pipe, call me a cracker and not be investigated? Oh, I forgot… I’m a white Christian. I have no rights in the Obama Nation. I’ve officially become a Dhimmi, a second class citizen in my own land.

    Right. Your Islamic-Socialist Government at work.

    And one can only hope that the Black Panthers try that thug crap again.

  56. #56
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The brownshirts are truly in charge. This administration is the most dangerous in American history.

  57. #57
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Of course, these geniuses are also convinced that Israeli towns keep jumping in front of Hamas-launched rockets just to provoke Hamas…

    They are not deluded. They are pro-Islam, anti-Jewish/Christian.

  58. #58
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, Ragspierre said:

    OT, but not so much….

    We are, as a people, confronted with the “false choice” (I’m sure THE ONE would say) of military or police action to defend our nation.

    http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/05/more-catch-and-release-in-gulf-of-amman/

    This story very nicely highlights the yawning gap between the two forms of response to very real threats to our security.

    I see all kinds of reasons to question the ability of this administration to secure America and Americans.

    I, have, in fact, grave reservations about their commitment to do that most fundamental duty.

  59. #59
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    we are committed to using criminal and civil rights laws to protect Muslim Americans.

    Well after those 3000 poor Muslims were murdered in the Twin Towers, you can see their point. Oh wait, I forgot American Muslims haven’t been subject to abuse…

  60. #60
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I, have, in fact, grave reservations about their commitment to do that most fundamental duty.

    Raspierre, they have only a commitment to protect their agenda and those that will further it. As evidenced by Holder’s dismissal of the case against the Islamic Thugs at the Philly voting place.

    American citizens were threatened. His answer to that??? Stop whining and accept it America.

  61. #61
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, would the EPA require that all Burkas be white (like roads and roofs)so they don’t absorb that pesky solar radiation that Al Gwhore is all concerned about? BTW if Al Gwhore goes to North Korea for his two Journalist what’s to keep ole Kim Jong Il from using him like a Tauntaun Sleeping Bag? Just a thought.

  62. #62
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:34 pm, b-cat said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    Please cite examples of when the Justice Department has failed to enforce laws or defend rights when applied to muslims. PLease.

  63. #63
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, lgm said:

    The FBI confirmed Wednesday it was investigating the possibility an Atlanta Jewish site

    Clearly the FBI is protecting Jews and Christians. Is there a reason they should not also protect Muslims?

  64. #64
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, hunter said:

    Clearly the FBI is protecting Jews and Christians. Is there a reason they should not also protect Muslims?

    FBI and the DOJ are two completely different entities. The FBI is invistgating an actual threat. The DOJ is issuing blanket statments that there are threats against muslims and they need to have extra protection for all.

    See the difference? I know stupid question, of course you don’t.

  65. #65
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, Hangfire said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, lgm said:

    Is there a reason they should not also protect Muslims?

    Quarantine is the best protection.

  66. #66
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, hunter said:

    Oh, and sorry lgm, I forgot to say good-bye, since you will be gone (as usual) after having one of your wrong (again) statments put down. Have a wonderful day!

  67. #67
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, Hangfire said:

    lgm makes Carville look like John Wayne.

  68. #68
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    Quote from Holder’s statement:

    We have a solemn responsibility to protect our people…

    Yeah, and it’s pretty clear who your people are Mr. Holder.

    I cannot begin to express my disgust with (and utter contempt of) the current administration’s words, nor their actions – or lack thereof.

  69. #69
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, James Felix said:

    Clearly the FBI is protecting Jews and Christians. Is there a reason they should not also protect Muslims?

    The point, you insufferable moron, is that the government should be protecting its citizens equally, without regard to race or religion. And that clearly is not the spirit behind Holder’s statement specifically and the Obama Administration generally.

  70. #70
    On June 5th, 2009 at 2:58 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Is there a reason they should not also protect Muslims?”

    Actually yes, there is. In the same way the government should not be putting out some kind of directive to protect Methodist, or fat people, or tall people, or deaf people. When the government moves to protecting Muslims, they are violating the separation of church and state. The federal government’s job is not to protect a particular religious group. Its job is to protect Americans.

    Given the facts of the matter, seems to me we non-Muslims are the ones who need protection.

  71. #71
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, sbw999 said:

    “The President’s pledge for a new beginning between the United States and the Muslim community takes root here in the Justice Department where we are committed to using criminal and civil rights laws to protect Muslim Americans. A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    How about the rights of the 3000 that died on 9-11 while they were at their “workplace”?

    How about the right of Private Long to not be murdered while he was at his workplace?

    What about their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness… Holder, Obama??????? Any words for them?????

    These ****ing azzholes in this Adminstration are more than any sane person can bear.

  72. #72
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Clearly the FBI is protecting Jews and Christians.

    Ummm…there is some question of the verity of that, given that one of our service members was shot to death last week in Arkansas…by a Muslim…who had been under surveillance, and there is some indication that that surveillance was compromised at the DOJ level.

  73. #73
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    little gullible moron just can’t quite see that it is the Muslims causing the mayhem and violence here. It starts with the New Black Panther Party founded by Malik Shabazz (guess his religion) starts threatening white Jewish and Christian voters. Holder orders the case dropped.

    Then a Muslim shoots up a recruiting station and kills one soldier and wounds another. Holder issues a statement pledging to protect MUSLIMS.

    I suspect one day we will wake up and find that the trained, experienced, Uighur terrorists from Gitmo are living right here in Alexandria after all. And Holder will pledge to protect them from Americans.

    I suppose the next time a Muslim lunatic cuts off his wife’s head with a butcher knife Holder will once again pledge to protect Muslims from Americans.

    God protect us from roving bands of Christian and Jewish extremists wrecking havoc on poor, innocent Muslims all across this great Muslim nation…

  74. #74
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:17 pm, Hangfire said:

    Since I pride myself in being un-PC, I think I will revert to use of the word “Moslem” vice “Muslim.” It brings back my childhood, a safer and happier time, if nothing else.

  75. #75
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:18 pm, sbw999 said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Well played. Truth.

  76. #76
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, Regulus said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:17 pm, Hangfire said:

    Since I pride myself in being un-PC, I think I will revert to use of the word “Moslem” vice “Muslim.” It brings back my childhood, a safer and happier time, if nothing else.

    If that’s the thinking, try “Mohammedan.” It really upsets them, because they take it as implying that theirs is a death cult of personality instead of a true religion; it has the added benefit of being true in that regard.

  77. #77
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:28 pm, xler8bmw said:

    What’s truly scary about this whole thing along with the hate crimes bill is this admin is putting minority groups above ALL americans. This is a VERY racist admin and it is becoming very visible.

    I believe BHO is a very ANGRY person w/a chip on his shoulder and he is using his power of office to right all of the the wrongs he believes tha have been done to minorities.

  78. #78
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, Regulus said:

    Then a Muslim shoots up a recruiting station and kills one soldier and wounds another. Holder issues a statement pledging to protect MUSLIMS.

    Huh? I thought that Holder was responding to an attack in Arkansas by Jehovah Witnesses, who burst into a mosque with AR-15s and grenades shouting “Christ is King!!”

    So if that’s not the case, then why is Holder so solicitous of protecting Mohammedans from us Christianists?

  79. #79
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:36 pm, Hangfire said:

    Thanks for the tip, Regulus.

    (from a Polaris sailor)

  80. #80
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, Regulus said:

    I believe BHO is a very ANGRY person w/a chip on his shoulder and he is using his power of office to right all of the the wrongs he believes tha have been done to minorities.

    Not quite. His wife is the angry person with a chip on her shoulder. He just follows along with her lead. Remember, Hope-a-Dope didn’t find the “reverend” Wright on his own…

  81. #81
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, Regulus said:

    Thanks for the tip, Regulus.

    (from a Polaris sailor)

    Perhaps you refer to the “Regulus” missile? I may be getting old, but I haven’t been around that long.

    Polaris boat vet, hmm? I like you Navy guys. Former Army myself, but I’ve always had a soft spot for the squids…

  82. #82
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    If we could bottle the anger coming from Barry and Miki Obama and harness that energy we could probably reduce our oil imports to near zero.

    There is more than enough anger in both of them. I had to pay for my own college. I grew up relatively poor. I didn’t get a free ride to an Ivy League school. They did. They are angry and I am not. Go figure.

  83. #83
    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:59 pm, desertdweller said:

    QUICK! Somebody start a site “thereligionofchrist.com” and start logging statistics on all the daily attacks on muslims! /* sarc */

    Good grief! Just what color glasses are these folks wearing, anyway?

  84. #84
    On June 5th, 2009 at 4:02 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    No doubt this is someone Eric Holder thinks needs protection – read the whole thing.

    As an American woman this makes me shudder.

    And it really pi$$es me off infuriates me that some want to dismiss it as “mental illness.”

  85. #85
    On June 5th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    among other reactions

    Yep.

    Stifle any criticism. Consider criticism a threat. Consider anxiety a threat. Incite more anxiety by releasing statements about people’s anxiety. Blanket accusations do not have a calming effect on those concerned. If your solemn duty is to protect the people, how do you allay their concerns? Not by issuing statements that are accusations toward a broad spectrum of citizens worried about not only national security but about their own civil liberties. Talk about dividing by fear.

    And is Mujahid’s lawyer trying to say that terrorists scared Mujahid so much that he became one himself? That line of direction will prove to be effective if today’s DOJ statement stays consistent.

    Andrew Sullivan now says he’s guilty of not giving equal attention to the two murders. Just FYI.

  86. #86
    On June 5th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, Papa Louie said:

    This comment from Obama, yesterday, in his Cairo Speech caught my attention:

    “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”

    Remember, this comes from the same man who fostered negative stereotypes about Christian America when he said, “…they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them…”
    But when it comes to Islam, it’s his job as President to “fight against negative stereotypes.”

    It makes me wonder if Obama considers any act of Islamic terrorism something that should be downplayed or even ignored because it promotes “negative stereotypes of Islam.” Could that be why it took him so long to even mention the fatal shooting of a soldier by a Muslim jihadist?

    As Commander and Chief of our Armed Forces, the President has a greater responsibility to support the soldiers serving under him than he does to “fighting against negative stereotypes of Islam” or any other religion for that matter. If any other President had said these words about any other religion, wouldn’t the ACLU have condemned it as a violation of the separation of church and state?

  87. #87
    On June 5th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Special K said:

    I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but I am beginning to wonder if this lying sack of sh*t who claims to be our president really is the Muslim Manchurian candidate. Every day something else comes out which just seems so ludicrous that it could not possibly be true, and yet it is. What’s next? Michelle and the girls wearing hijabs? Shariah law? What the hell is going on here?

  88. #88
    On June 5th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    WarEagle82 said:

    If we could bottle the anger coming from Barry and Miki Obama and harness that energy we could probably reduce our oil imports to near zero.

    There is more than enough anger in both of them. I had to pay for my own college. I grew up relatively poor. I didn’t get a free ride to an Ivy League school. They did. They are angry and I am not. Go figure.

    They are among those that believe they are ENTITLED to even more.

  89. #89
    On June 5th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, xler8bmw said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, Regulus said:

    Wrong! Don’t believe everything you hear. I suggest you take a look back on his history and the people he surrounded himself w/before Wright who is a former muslim!

  90. #90
    On June 5th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, reshas1 said:

    I told my husband last night, there are really no words anymore that describe what Obama is doing!! Outrageous, horrendous, etc, doesn’t even come close to describing this..
    AND, my Mom and I were talking yesterday, Obama is NOT passing the smell test, I think that there is something sinister going on(maybe Soros and his ilk?)

  91. #91
    On June 5th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Seems as if Steny Hoyer and other dems in congress are getting a little upset over all of the czars being appointed by Obamageddon! Hopefully tis is the beginning of the dems in congress starting to revolt against the usurper!

  92. #92
    On June 5th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, Big Hammer and Anvil said:

    While reverting to the old names, bring back Musselman!

    We need another insidious uninformed quote from the Reichs Heinie professorship at uberliberal non critical thinking Math department

    lgm that’s your cue!

    too late and STFU

  93. #93
    On June 5th, 2009 at 6:28 pm, d1carter said:

    When will this end…?

  94. #94
    On June 5th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, Buy Danish said:

    Will Holder hire the New Black Panther Party as enforcers?

  95. #95
    On June 5th, 2009 at 6:51 pm, cheapseat said:

    holder doesn’t have to hire them, they are already on the payroll of the democrat party, and hence president obama. aloha guy, always a great comment, those 3000 muslims killed in ny will be missed, so we really should be paying diligent attention to the mennonites in pa, ohio, and indiana. those churches of theirs are meeting places to foment terror plots like building a new barn for one of their members newlywed child. damn christians and jews have been spreading their religion by the sword and bomb for centuries now. when will poor persecuted muslims rise up and fight back.

  96. #96
    On June 5th, 2009 at 9:30 pm, granite said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, reshas1 said:

    …Obama is NOT passing the smell test, I think that there is something sinister going on(maybe Soros and his ilk?)

    Exactly.

    Felt that way since months before the election.

  97. #97
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:10 pm, WarTip said:

    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:28 am, rocketman said: I used to think that people who thought our government was working against the American people were stupid or crazy.

    Is that an apology to people like me? Since Junior High school I have been pointing out little things that will inevitably snowball as congress critters get their power-hungry paws on them. The SCOTUS has been going downhill since the mid seventies when they were allowed to decide for themselves which cases they would or would not hear.

    Political expediency and power have long surpassed the will of the people in importance to America’s politicians and new “Royal elite” classes such as the Kennedies, Pelosi and others. They are doing to our country now what the carpetbaggers were trying to accomplish after the Civil War only this time, the thieves are in power.

    Muslims are not terrorists because the government says so but anybody who believe in ANY of the Constitution, the Bible or otherwise has a firm set of beliefs and/or morals and values is now to be investigated as a potential terrorist … probably because people who are right-thinking and actually stand for something “terrorize” those on the left because they are terribly afraid of discovering just how many chinks there are in their armor. The reality is that their “armor” based on their “emotional beliefs” is nothing more than a sad, poorly made re-make of the Emperor’s New Clothes.

  98. #98
    On June 5th, 2009 at 11:27 pm, jangar said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    Except those darn pesky Christians of the radical right who refuse to agree with our soon-to-be implemented social change agenda.

  99. #99
    On June 6th, 2009 at 3:31 am, Elm Creek Smith said:

    “There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear – to pit our national security against our civil liberties – but that is a false choice. We have a solemn responsibility to protect our people while we also protect our principles.”

    You’re doing a bang-up job, Eric. I mean look how well you protected those two young soldiers in Little Rock.

    /sarc

    ECS

  100. #100
    On June 6th, 2009 at 8:45 am, englishqueen01 said:

    A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market, in our schools and in the voting booth.

    “There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear – to pit our national security against our civil liberties – but that is a false choice. We have a solemn responsibility to protect our people while we also protect our principles.”

    Except for Christians, pro-lifers, and those who support traditional marriage. I noticed no national defense of Mormons or Catholics faced with Prop 8 violence, or any promise to fight “negative stereotypes” of the same (as Obama vowed to do for Muslims in his Cairo speech).

    Liberals are always hyping about how Christians are going to impose a theocracy on America – something that didn’t even happen under Bush. And won’t happen. But this isn’t attempting to “divide by fear.”

    Good gracious.

    I say let them. Those “American Muslims” will turn around and bite us in the collective butt. I will relish the day when they start actively working to overturn gay marriage (a no-no in Islam), abortion (also a no-no) and put feminism (a big no-no) on the back burner. It will be hilarious to watch liberals flip out when we warned them about this. Time and again.

    But you reap what you sew.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Redstate

» Media Matters
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook