AOL News has been bending over backwards lately to make sure that they do not cover the controversy surrounding Playboy.com writer Guy Cimbalo’s vile attack on conservative women. AOL News has taken some drastic steps to censor any mention, l….

But by 15 or 16 I would think most males would be over Playboy–obviously not.

Seriously? 15 or 16 is the end date for appreciating hot naked women? Sex sells. . . men are never going to be ‘over Playboy’. It’s the simplest business model in history.

torture by Obama’s very definition…jes’ sayin’….

I remember several female satirists and comediennes being especially vicious towards the governor, and w/ few in the MSM saying anything to rebuff it.

On June 5th, 2009 at 10:54 am, Rekd said:

I’m not into reading the articles, I just look at the pictures.

Yea, my mother didn’t buy the “just reading the articles” either
But by 15 or 16 I would think most males would be over Playboy–obviously not.
Hopefully Time Warner/AOL will soon join the other dinosaur media and just fade away. Then those tired old fools can “hatef**k” each other and leave real people alone.

Yes lgm, Bush did it.

Yes, she did say and use the word “venom”. She said that Michelle invited said venom to be used against her.

However, this was used when describing a certain type of “venomous” attack, i.e. the “Grudge F’ing” of Conservative women.

Therefore, no retraction by anyone but this hideous beast need be made. The message was indeed clear, and that is this jealous woman declared that venom is justifed against our dear host, especially when that venom can be describing ‘Grudge rape”.

On June 5th, 2009 at 10:21 am, lgm said:

This rings true to me.

The same standard used for the Saddam/WMD/supported 9/11 “intelligence”.

Yes, that’s the one: the same one used by every intelligence agency in the world at the time to reach the same conclusion as Bush.

On June 5th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, lgm said:

DBNinKY (#35)

Defend is fine. Presume is less fine.

Hangfire said (#48):

I think it is against the Geneva Convention to force Jihadist prisoners at Guantanamo to have sex with Helen Thomas.

Aren’t we huff-n-puffing today about rape talk on the internet.

Only you equate having sex with Thomas as rape. I would just find it physically (maybe more mentally) impossible…

You could say it like its an award or something. Like you won another award from even liberal sites like Playboy for being fair and honest. Seriously, it has to be good pub to have your name next to playboys in the national news anyway – eh? It’s not like anyone actually touched you.

Do you really think that someone is going to read this and do something bad to you? The worst that could happen is some dudes who never heard of you saw you in Playboy and thought they should check you out – how is that bad.

But yeah, keep this in the media attention. I’d talk about it every day. In fact, I’d DEMAND that Heff himself come to the board and contribute as a guest blogger one day.

It’s marketing and Heff has the ’sex sells’ thing cornered. Heff and Playboy don’t want to offend anyone. They want everyone happy. They took it down but I’d still use it for pub.