“Liberal sexist pigs”
Ashley Herzog calls it like she sees it.
Ashley speaks from experience.
***
Speaking of liberal sexist pigs, here’s David Letterman bashing Sarah and her daughter.
Palin responds here.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
More CPAC speeches in 20 words
February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin
75 Comments
Palin: If I Lived in South Carolina, I’d Vote for Newt
January 17, 2012 10:28 PM by Doug Powers
127 Comments
Sarah Palin is out of 2012 race
October 5, 2011 06:26 PM by Michelle Malkin
107 CommentsAdventures in liberal tolerance, part 999,901
September 29, 2011 02:39 PM by Michelle Malkin
48 Comments
Palin Lawyers Warn Publisher of ‘The Rogue’ Not to Destroy Documents Ahead of Possible Lawsuit
September 26, 2011 10:46 PM by Doug Powers
70 CommentsPoll: Palin Picks Up Steam Against Obama
September 20, 2011 10:48 PM by Doug Powers
154 Comments
Categories: Double standards,Playboy,Sarah Palin
Weekly Standard
» White House Economic Adviser: 'We Need a Global Minimum Tax'Pundit & Pundette
» Bishop Jenky, Nicki Minaj, and the "98%"JustOneMinute
» We Hear From The Department Of Good Ideas And False Choices
I thought young Ashley nailed it very nicely.
One takes courage at the quality of our young people in the conservative movement.
They are all thirteen year old boys with too much time and hair on their hands.
It’s fair to say that conservatives have sufficiently supplanted liberals in the realm of identity politics. Token black RNC chaiman: check. Token female VP candidate: check. Token black Supreme Court justice: check. Token Obama-rebutter of color: check. Howling at the top of their lungs accusing the other side of racism, sexism and whatever other insults they were called by hairy feminists in undergrad: check.
Strong words from the White People Party.
I think it was Thomas Sowell who wrote that there are some amazing courageous people in the conservative movement, and they’re all named Michelle, or Ann or LaShawn. That was true, and now we can add Ashley to the list.
You, sir, are a racist.
B-cat, what does that individual’sost have to do with the thread topic?
That individual must have had fun trying to BS his/?her? way out of the consequences of being actively annoying on the school playground.
…post….
Apologies.
Red State
SkepticBigotA meritocracy has no tokens. Just good people; see US military; see also Reagen and Bush cabinet; see also “capitalist enterprise”.
On June 9th, 2009 at 12:52 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
They are all thirteen year old boys with too much time and hair on their hands.
Couldn’t have said it better! I’m LMAO!!!!!!
RSS, all those people you mention are experienced and eminently qualified for their positions. PBO is the ultimate token.
RSS sees high caliber Blacks and women as tokens? Misogyny and racism all in one post, you must be proud of yourself RSS, take a bow.
Red State, you forgot a few.
The party that ended slavery, check.
The party that passed the Civil Rights Act, check.
The party that extended voting rights to other races, check.
Democrats SAY they support black people, but then try to keep them dependent on the Government. When a black person doesn’t know “their place”, like J.C. Watts, et.al. then that black person is called names like “Uncle Tom” or told they’re “acting white.”
The same for women, Hispanics, and any other group you can think of.
It is really quite amazing to me that anyone could read the root article of this thread, and not join in condemning in the strongest terms the mentality behind the Playboy and other muck recited.
RS
SB found it easy, apparently. Would this be a person you would let anywhere near your family?Why did Playboy publish an article that called Michelle a Filipina?
Michelle is an American…so now Playboy is taking back her American citizen status? They get to decide who is an American?
Who writes for Playboy? There must be a real brain drain if this is the best Playboy can get to write for them.
It’s funny how y’all love to say you’re not Republicans, you’re conservatives, except when talking about events a hundred and forty years ago. There’s a reason we got called “liberal” and it ain’t our free market philosophy.
As I have written several times, non-Southern Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act. All Southern Republicans voted against, and more non-Southern Republicans than Democrats voted against. And, of course, Barry Goldwater, the Republican nominee for President the year the CRA was passed and intellectual forefather of the modern conservative movement, voted against.
Let’s not even talk about all the freaking racists you STILL have.
This is simply false. Of course, you can’t put up your numbers, so I won’t bother to ask.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#By_party_and_region
That would be true. The reason is you have to hide your true agenda from the people.
You are not a “liberal“. You are a statist. A progressive. These things are antithetical to liberalism, which was the philosophical root of the Constitution, which you hate.
Civil Rights Act of 1965:
Vote count
The two numbers in each line of this list refer to the number of representatives voting in favor and against the act, respectively.
Senate: 77–19
Democrats: 47–17 Percent For: 73Republicans: 30–2 Percent For: 93
House: 333–85
Democrats: 221–61 Percent For: 78
Republicans: 112–24 Percent For: 82
Mr. Hefner turned over the reins at Playboy years ago. He is a figurehead for the company, much the same way as Col. Sanders was after he sold his chicken business to an outside corporation.
Since then, the stance of the magazine has shifted considerably from hedonism to leftism.
Now, it is better to look at the pictures than read the articles. For generations, young men have claimed the opposite.
* Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
The Senate version:[9]
* Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]
* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
Are you talking about the Black Panther thugs Eric Holder let off the hook? Al Sharpton inciting a riot and fire that killed a Jewish guy?
There was one. The south was Democrat.
At least at KFC you get cole slaw with your greasy breasts and thighs.
They have to lie. That’s all they’ve got.
Doh! I grabbed votes for the Voting Rights Act by mistake.
The quote in one of the linked articles, “Fighting homophobia with misogyny” is so revealing of the mindset of today’s left. This is, ultimately, where identity politics leads.
An interesting gestalt is to try to figure out where we’d end up if the left is successful in turning this country into a one-party totalitarian state. Increasingly, I’m leaning toward a replay of the French Revolution: when there are no more “Royalists” (i.e., Republicans and Christians) to send to the guillotine, the “Revolutionaries” (i.e., assorted “victim” groups) will proceed to turn on each other.
From liberalism to leftism is simply a sliding scale of expressed symptoms of mental illness: from envy to jealousy, from anger to hatred, from fear to superstition, from suspicion to paranoia, from sarcasm to rage, from condescension to bigotry, and so on.
Consider how Michelle must get their stomach acid flowing on overload:
- She’s a minority female; by right the left “owns” her, body and soul. However…
- She has committed heresy by holding conservative opinions.
- Worse, she has expressed those opinions.
- Worse, she has expressed those opinions in public.
- Worse, she has expressed those opinions vociferously.
- Worse, she won’t shut up when threatened.
With each step, the left’s negative emotional boilers build up more steam, until it gets to, “Double-schnapps for the black gang, and cap the safety valve!” — then the whole thing explodes (e.g., periodic outbursts of rape and murder fantasies).
It’s fair to say that
conservativesliberals have sufficiently supplantedliberalsminorities in the realm of identity politics. Token blackRNC chaimanAttorney General: check. Token femaleVP candidateSecretary of State: check. TokenblackLatina Supreme Court justice: check.California is the model of diversity and governance we all strive for.
RS
SB-I guess the Democrats are very proud of their “token” Klansman – Robert K. Byrd.
Now, that’s been addressed, why haven’t you expressed your dismay at the misogynistic responses from today’s leftists where strong women who espouse Conservative values are concerned? Or, is apologising something than only Conservatives do?
ECS
Rimshot to you!
Nice try. Those numbers look good only because the Democratic party was then the party of white southerners (not anymore). By region, Democrats clearly supported the CRA much more.
And, ahem, Goldwater.
Number Two from classy Leftist Letterman’s
Top Ten, speaking of Gov. Palin–
Bought makeup from Bloomingdale’s to update her “slutty flight attendant” look
Of course, this in same pig who joked with Alec Baldwin about ordering a Filippa mail-order bride.
Twist, spin, whatever. The numbers DO look good, because the people behind them WERE good.
The current Dimocrat party relies on racism every day. It is the home of racism in this country today.
Boy, lots of errors in #33…but you get the gist.
Because I really don’t give a crap. “Hate sex” isn’t rape, it’s passionate sex with someone you don’t like, like an ex-girlfriend after a bad breakup or something.
I guess Carrie Prejean got a bad rap, but Perez Hilton doesn’t represent me any more than Toby Keith (or Scott Roeder) represents you, so whatever.
Confirmation of what we all know to be true;
Liberals/Socialists/Progressives, in order to justify their immoral positions, must endorse the engagement of:
sexual liberty (anything goes),
sexual reproductive rights (infanticide),
creative sexual fantasy (rape, Sado-masochism, homosexuality).
The more these miscreants mouth their displeasure with those of us who believe in justice, morality, and common sense, the more I am convinced they KNOW they are wrong.
Perhaps the worm has started to turn?
Nothing to do with free anything at all. The term was subverted by the Communists and means communist today. Progressive, the preferred term by leftists today, has always been a euphemism for communist.
I’m no psychiatrist, but seriously, you are one effed up person, probably best suited to prison life! And you wonder why so many conservatives dislike liberal thought?
Clearly an urban legend.
…….otherwise my hands would look like furry mittens………..
Good grief, I wonder if you even see how lame that is.
Of course it is like rape. There is no love behind what this thug was writing, and it was all about dominance and subjugation.
What a puke.
Let’s amend that:
Token black presidential candidate: Check.
Token Latina Supreme Court Justice: Check.
Tons of liberals demeaning conservatives who are black/Hispanic/female: Check.
RedStateSkeptic doing nothing to dispel the truth that liberals are the party of racist and sexists: Check.
Good to know. Then “hate crimes” really aren’t crimes, their just passionate injuries to someone you don’t like.
Good grief, man.
Ashley must be related to the great Whitey Herzog.
She REALLY knows the game.
Too bad the MSM will continue to ignore those among us who stand up for what is right.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Sotomayor was a federal appeals judge for 12 years. Clarence Thomas was an undistinguished bureaucrat for the EEOC before he was appointed to the DC Circuit (just one year before appointed to the SCOTUS). Which one do you really think was the token?
Neither. Thomas was a great choice for a Supreme Court justice, predicated on his VAST experience in the law (you idiot, you should read his book).
Sotomayor isn’t a token. She’s a radical racist, like her president.
Boy! For someone who really doesn’t give a crap, you sure were awful quick to defend that good ol’ liberal plantation mentality with some stats from the Wiki no less! Touch a nerve did we?
Given the fact that Democrats blocked one of Bush’s Hispanic nominees, ignore the fact there was a Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court (appointed by Herbert Hoover), and ignore Sotomayor’s “Latina women judges make better decisions than white men”, my vote still goes to Sotomayor.
But keep going. You really help reinforce our theory.
“Rise above the collegial nastiness and instead….celebrate excellence,” said (Katie) Couric to Princeton graduates right after mocking Sara Palin and Carrie Prejean.
Consistent much?
Excellance? I thought we were supposed to celebrate diversity? Jeez, make up your minds, will ya!?
No, YOUR party is all about IDENTITY POLITICS and always will be. At least conservatives (of all bents and perspectives) believe in the potential of the individual, not the potential of centralized, governmental authority. What is it that you believe? When you’re “rebutted,” you lean on the same old tired, those racist Dixiecrats voted against civil rights so that must mean that Republicans or even conservatives are racists. Your words ring hollow and sour.
You have no freaking idea, as a liberal man, what it’s like to be a conservative woman. And you never will because you can’t crack open that empty vessel you call a brain to fill it with ideas that would supplant those provided by your precious liberalism and statism. You don’t care about this country or about the Constitution/founding until it proves convenient to heap insults on those who disagree with you.
Liberal women, like my sister, sold themselves out a long time ago. A lot of liberal chicks think spreading their legs will instantaneously mean they have control over not only their sexuality but their freedom. Liberal women have become so divorced from their “true nature” that they decry those who “save themselves” for marriage because they think that the merest suggestion of tradition will take away their time-honored “reproductive rights.” They’re only kidding themselves.
Liberals as some of the biggest, puff-off group of hedonists I’ve ever met. As long as you don’t get in the way of their “good time” and their social experimentation for the “good of all humanity” everything is fine and dandy. When you call ‘em out on what they’re really doing, degrading social/moral mores, then you’re Satan.
Until you accept the hypocrisy on your side you will never get. Liberal women have put out for the Dem party for far too long and it’s time to look outside the empty shell of liberalism which has provided them with such false protections as abortion and “equal rights.”
Stop co-opting feminism or talking out of both sides of your mouth. You do disservice to every minority and woman who believe differently than you and you know it. You just despise them and can’t admit it.
Who’s full of hate now, RSS?
firstly, LOL @ Rogue Cheddar.
now…
Ashley, I’ll say it again…jealousy. The Right has much prettier and intelligent women.
RSS so you support raping conservative women. Sick twisted bastard. You would fit right into the KGB. I also see you support a woman who thinks that her race and sex makes her better that others. So you are a racist, sexit supporter of politicaly based rape.
God help your children.
The whole point of feminism is to give unattractive women unfair access to whatever.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Currently, the wimpy Republican party is the true party of the masses.
The Democrat Party (should be Green-Labour) is a coalition of special interest groups.
And, yes, I used the British spelling for Labour as a slam.
Is it hot in here or just emjem24? nice post.
RSS: RE: Republicans, Goldwater and Civil Rights Act. Kindly put down your Al Franken book and step aside. This is nothing but imaginary and prayerful speculation on your part.
Upon signing the Civil Rights Act, President Johnson cited Republicans for their “overwhelming support” of the Act.
As far as Goldwater, he had no history of being a racist, yet one of champoning civil rights including desegregating the AZ National Guard. He also (before entering public office) integrated his family business and was a founding member of the NAACP.
His move to vote against the Civil Rights Act had more to do with a political stradegy (not a smart one at that) as it was with his running with George Wallace – which cost him his career. It was a move against Johnson who he personally and politically detested after being lied to on many fronts about the Vietnam War.
An unwise political move, but that does not a racist make. He suffered the consequences for his decision to do so. But labeling Goldwater as a racist is a dicey and poorly founded argument.
You might want to look to Al Gore though, his father along with Robert Byrd (Southern Democrat and KKK member) engaged in an unsuccessful 74-day filibuster in an attempt to stop the Civil Rights Act.
Go seek self intimacy elsewhere, RSS.
BTW RSS name the only serving member in congress who was in the KKK.
And shove that down your racist sexist rape supporting throat.
Actually, he made it sound like a good thing!
Michelle – and any other conservative woman – shouldn’t be offended when someone wants to sexually assault them because they mean it in a good way. It’d be passionate, or something.
Any logical person would tell you it can’t be interpreted any other way than rape, because it’s safe to presume that any woman on a “hate sex” list would not be a willing participant in said sex, especially since the other person (a man, mind you) has openly admitted he hates them.
No, the whole point of feminism is to make women into men and men into eunuchs.
Thank you.
You beat me to it.
In a similar vein, psychiatry is not my specialty; but:
Why would one have passionate sex with someone one does not like, unless it were 100% only for one’s pleasure, and 0% for the other’s pleasure (i.e., 100% selfish)?;
or as a form of expression of violent feelings (do control or power come to mind? – no pun intended) toward the other – gee, isn’t that starting to sound sort of like rape?
Now THAT was one righteous smackdown!
RSS is full of BS
Read and learn
Dispute this
Dem party platform for decades concerning blacks
I could go on all day but you are NOT worth the effort.
Last but not least EVER
GRANDSON BORN
I never thought I’d read so much about playboy without a picture.
Ashley is probably more jealous that she wasn’t one of the top ten. I’ve never heard of her, but she seems like she’d have fit the mold of what they were looking for.
Again, I’m not excusing the article. But I’m saying you should just use this for more publicity. Playboy is a non-entity of political thought.
The only time people see the article is when conservative bloggers write how offended they are about it. As I said, MM should demand that Hef come on and apologize – he probably would. He might even do it on a show on E! to give you even more publicity.
See, with liberals, you have to look at intention. Not results. RSS doesn’t intend for “hate sex” to be rape, therefore it isn’t – regardless of consent!
Sorry, mispoke on Wallace. but everything else stands.
Playboy hasn’t been relevant to womens’ sexuality since the 1960s. In fact, it has been a symbol of sexual objectification of women for the past 40 years, hardly liberation. Not surprising in the Newspeak of the Obama Era that a publication that claims to be liberating actually preaches mysogany. Not surprising either that the gynophobes at Playboy resent intelligent, attractive independent women.
Thanks, Rogue. I’m so sick of liberal men (and women) who think they’re so “evolved” yet can’t recognize the hypocrisy in their own political dogma.
RSS can kiss my grits (I don’t really like grits but that’s another story).
I firmly believe that 100 years from now humankind will view psychiatry the same way we currently view “leeching” or “bloodletting” as a medical procedure.
RSS is a flat out idiot if he can’t see the racism and sexism in his party. Just because it is aimed at white males, doesn’t make it right although it does make it “politicaly correct”
I’d say that feminism and liberalism can be added to things that have been useless to women’s sexuality and liberation since the 1960s.
MM, think about where women would be without the efforts of liberal feminists since WWII. Without Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, it would not be an insult to call someone sexist. It would be perfectly acceptable to belittle an opinion because it was coming from a woman.
John Roberts campaigned against women at Princeton, as William F. Buckley before him campaigned against civil rights.
Liberals: trying to make America better.
Conservatives: trying to keep it like it is.
You didn’t say hominy times?
BTW, this thread has SAVED 100 billion American jobs today….
more or less.
Liberals: trying to make America
better.a politicaly correct dictatorship.FIFY
Seriously LGM, todays feminism is about extra rights for women, not equal rights.
WOW. Comment pulled because I destroyed RSS or the link to grandson born? Thanks.
lgm, Gloria Steinem did more to work against “feminism” than for it. She is a banchee and her brand of “victimhood” is anything but feminism.
Liberals: trying to make America STATEIST.
Conservatives: trying to
keep it like it isRETURN IT TO THE CONSTITUTION.And it still is.
So long as the one doing the belittling is a liberal, and the woman is a conservative.
Yeah. Obama and his crew are really trying to make this a better place.
How corny.
You mean like quadrupling the debt in 90 days and trying to consolidate as much power in DC as possible while kicking the rights of states, private business, and individules to the curb? Boy, that sure will make this a better country.
Have a nice day lgm, maybe we will hear from you again tomorrow.
I see the peckergnats are out early this season.
No, lgm sniper. It’s:
Conservatives: Bending over backwards to make America better.
Liberals: Bending conservatives over forwards to hurt America.
LGM, obamas new supreme court pick would never have been picked if she had not been hispanic and a woman.
With California as the test run.
California was better the way it was.
The first rule of Liberal discourse: A Liberal can never win an argument based on facts. They must always turn to name calling or lies because facts so rarely support a liberal argument.
Johnson (one of, if not the most corrupt Presidents of the 20th Century – a Democrat) remarked that signing the Civil Rights Act would keep the blacks (he didn’t use that word but I can’t repeat the word he used in a civil forum) voting Democrat for decades.
He was right.
But, of course, his comments were revealing about the Democrat mindset about the CRA.
Lastly, RSS has once again proven himself a bigoted fool. b-cat, your #5 comment was absolutely correct.
See what liberals mean by making America “better” and “freer” is not in regards to economically, or Constitutional rights.
It has to do with, frankly, sex and abortion and all manner of proclivity related to those two.
And if all of this is about making things better for American women, like so many other liberal policies, it’s an EPIC FAIL. From The New York Times, surprisingly:
So if this was about bettering America, liberals lose. Again.
At the risk of sounding sexist (which I assure you I’m not), are there any LIBERAL women commentators who could even be the subject of a conservative “hate f*ck” list? I’m not coming up with any names. The right has much more attractive women.
That too, but it’s undeniable that liberals engage in what they call feminism to give unattractive (in many ways) women unfair access to success … kinda like Affirmative Action.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dworkin, and Helen Gurley Brown ripped women off their pedestal and threw them into the mud.
How dare you! My sister was raped at a frat party at Cornell University and that act alone not only destroyed our family but her life. Do you even know what rape is? Do you have any concept of how rape shatters the human soul?
It’s takes an especially sick and twisted pig like yourself, RSS, to even plausibly describe “hate sex” as some new trendy activity that quarreling, broken up couples do for “old time’s sake.”
What the hell is your problem? Not only do you not get women, you certainly are so insensitive, you don’t get rape either. I’ve found more agreeable, understanding men on this blog than I find you to be.
You’re the worst kind of misogynistic, condescending pig to ever grace this blog. Don’t even pretend to say you care about “women’s rights” and “human rights” when every other word out of your mouth suggests otherwise.
No, I’m beginning to believe why liberals don’t give a fig about women when one of its true believers dismiss the uglier side of that philosophy.
RSS: word of advice. If you’re ever truly interested in a committed relationship that doesn’t revolve around your twisted fantasies, don’t engage in “hate sex” because I’d hate to be you when you’re accused of “rape” by some uppity woman who “tweaked” you in some way.
If by “unattractive”, you mean lazy and bitter, then perhaps. Because I don’t consider myself a beauty queen, but I certainly am not a liberal.
But that really begs the question; I can’t imagine making such a list of liberal women, or leeringly approving of a conservative who did.
I would be on a thread like this one denouncing them.
Can we vote RSS off the island?
It just makes it more obvious that the kids have had their fun, but it really is time for the adults to run things again.
Maybe he can find a gay man who dislikes him and find out if he still thinks it isn’t rape..
True enough, but maybe someone out there can explain why the obviously statist Republican Party keeps trying to call itself “conservative” when it’s nothing of the sort …
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
No, because liberals have no concept of how libertine sex in general shatters the family, the body, and the soul.
RSS is proof that the notion consent is the sole criterion of the good is a fading concept. Pretty soon consent will not even be tolerated if it stands in the way of someone’s groin.
I wouldn’t wish that on even him. I think he’s done it to himself, in any event.
‘Rithmentic boy’s lefty idea of “making America better” is to make it unlike “America” and make the US territory and it’s population a mirror image of the Soviet Union and Cuba.
He certainly has here..