Sounds familiar.
Beat me to it! Maybe he is getting one of his kids ready to take over his throne….

“… as long as they don’t declare Martial Law.”

To hang on to power, don’t think that they won’t.

Very possible… which is why I ended with that caveat.

If they do declare Martial Law, that very well could trigger a
second American revolution to free “We the People” from a
tyrannical government.

Well, as might be expected, that crazy Little Gargoyle in North Korea, Kim Is Mentally Ill appears to have appointed his son with the title “Brilliant Comrade”. Which leads many to believe that the Little Gargoyle is grooming him as the successor to …

To hang on to power, don’t think that they won’t.

right_on said:
Didn’t I read recently, that Un was an alcoholic, sexually perverted, and was addicted to video games?

Saddam’s sons incarnate.

ITookTheRedPill, we are all scared… but the problem we’re having is what do we do? … my question to you is: Now that we’re wide awake, what do we do to stop this?

Every day, more and more people are waking up to what’s going on politically. Even a Democratic congressman admits that Obama’s TARP and Pay Czar is Socialism, and that the Democratic leadership used fear mongering and threats of Martial Law to manipulate votes in their favor.

“Now that we’re wide awake, what do we do to stop this?”

#1 – Pray.

We’re awake politically, but we’re not fully awake spirtually. The success of this country has always been dependent on the faith of its citizens.

In God We Trust

Pray for all of those in our government, regarless of their party.
Repent of our own sins. Ask God to heal our land.

Those who live by the sword (or gun), die by the sword (or gun). While I believe in 2nd Amendment rights and protecting your family, I do not advocate armed insurrection. The Socialists took control of our government without firing a shot. I believe we can take it back without firing a shot, as long as they don’t declare Martial Law.

And yes, this will make you chuckle:

Grandiose titles are part of a tradition to stimulate public support in a nation where the media is tightly controlled and little information about the inner workings of the government is available. The leader is given credit for most national projects. The state media carry endless flattering reports about Kim, repeatedly referring to him with his various titles of which “Dear Leader” is the most prominent.

Chuckle? I think not. Read that again with, say, the NYT in mind, with just a couple of corrected “typos”:

“Grandiose titles are part of a tradition to stimulate public support in a nation where the media is tightly controlled and little information about the inner workings of the government is available. The leader president is given credit for most national projects. The state media carry endless flattering reports about Kim Barack, repeatedly referring to him with his various titles of which ‘Dear Leader’ is the most prominent.”

I have not found any that said Obama’s admin made the decision.

“The Buck Stops Here,” it comes with the territory of being president – especially one that the press has dubbed “the most engaged president ever!”

On June 12th, 2009 at 5:54 pm, Ragspierre said:

…government bureaucrats use cost/benefit analysis as a prime criteria for decision-making.

Humming the theme from Jeopardy…

Uh Rags, the government runs C/B analysis quite frequently. It COSTS us, the taxpayer vs. the BENEFIT to the elected/appointed officials’, financially or politically. We seem to lose every time.

Not to take sides, Chaps, but it’s allover the Net, on sites like Adage.com and the WSJ, using any search engine you desire.

I have found plenty of articles saying GM has slashed the budget by 800 million in February. I have not found any that said Obama’s admin made the decision.

An underscore is not necessary. Evidence of your claim is what I am asking for.

Not to take sides, Chaps, but it’s allover the Net, on sites like Adage.com and the WSJ, using any search engine you desire.

I didn’t say that, but clearly spending however much they were on marketing wasn’t getting it done. Maybe they decided they should spend a bit more cash on developing a product people want rather than marketing ones people don’t want. Speculation? Perhaps.

I disagree. The ads worked to create desire for GM vehicles but their high prices – related solely to UAW benefits – prevented demand.

But no less so than your speculation that GM is cutting its NASCAR program out of mere spite.

GM may not have but can the same be said of Democrat controlled Gov Motors?

The state media carry endless flattering reports about Kim, repeatedly referring to him with his various titles of which “Dear Leader” is the most prominent.

Sounds alot like Obama the First.