See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, spaceycakes said:

   ABC reporters refrained from then reporting studies showing we have one of the least efficient systems.

   ‘studies’?

   That’s because
   1) it’s not true
   and therefore
   2) it doesn’t exist.

2. #102
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

   ABC decides to do a warm-and-fuzzy on the White House and President. They’ve been doing this at least since Nixon.

   Cite TO EVIDENCE. Otherwise, I’m calling BS on you…

   again…

   some more….

   in sequence…

3. #103
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, Thomas said:

   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, Joy said:

   Michelle – LOVE your logo! Best one I’ve seen for this topic.

   As to Doug Powers – He’s an incredibly vulgar man and I really don’t get his association with your blog.

   The linked font oral sex logo really is bizarre.

4. #104
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Ragspierre said:

   The linked font oral sex logo really is bizarre.

   Oral….???

5. #105
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, USN RET said:

   So will Charles Gibson be doing a live colonoscopy of the One using his head?

6. #106
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, martin.musculus said:

   Gee, comments at The ABCucaracha-network response are closed…

   Just like their minds.

   Could a group who closed comments to limit opposing/exposing comments reasonably be expected to air all sides as quoted here (… with correction and additions on behalf of full-disclosure…):

   To that end, ABC News announced plans to broadcast a primetime hour from the White House devoted to exploring and probing the President’s position and givingmuting voice to questions and criticisms of that position. We hope that any American concerned about health care will find our efforts to be informative, fair and civilcloying, farcical and somnolent.

   Second, ABC News prides itself on covering burying all sides [opposing the messiah] of important issues and asking direct [though irrelevant] questions of all newsmakers our owners — of all political persuasions — even when others have taken a more partisan approach and even in the face of criticism from extremes on both ends of the political spectrum. ABC News is looking for the most thoughtful and diversehomogeneity and conformability of voices on this issue. ABC News [The Prophet] Rohm Emmanuel alone will select those who will be in the audience asking questions of the president. Like any programs we broadcast, ABC News will have complete editorial control. To suggest otherwise is quite unfair to both our journalists and our audience. [We Obey Our God, Lord Cucaracha after all...]

7. #107
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:39 pm, Papa Louie said:

   In the end, no one watching, listening to, or reading ABC News will lack for an understanding of all sides of these important questions.
   – ABC News

   This is proof that ABC is lying because even they know that only those who lack understanding would watch ABC in the first place.

8. #108
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, granite said:

   ABC decides to do a warm-and-fuzzy on the White House and President. They’ve been doing this at least since Nixon. They did it for Bush. Republicans ask for time to rain on this sunny parade. ABC says no. Suddenly we have a state controlled press.

   Bull! The major networks are constantly reporting the inane Republican positions on things, and mostly (though this is hard for reporters who actually know things) with a straight face.

   Just yesterday ABC reported John McCain saying that the US has the most efficient health care system in the world. ABC reporters refrained from then reporting studies showing we have one of the least efficient systems. Republicans have no idea how much they benefit from unquestioning reporters shoveling their s**t.

   Wow!

   This sounds like an even edgier, newer version of the new Sybil.

9. #109
   On June 16th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, spaceycakes said:

   granite:

   “I live right there, I live right there, Willow Corners Wisconsin; I live right there….”

10. #110
    On June 16th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, Ragspierre said:

    USN RET said:

    For creative obscenity, nobody tops the Navy…

    Props, not criticism…

11. #111
    On June 16th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, USN RET said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, Ragspierre said:
    For creative obscenity, nobody tops the Navy…

    Props, not criticism…

    Thank you Thank you I’m here every day Please try the veal

12. #112
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Joy said:

    Rags – click the Doug Powers link in MM’s post to see his vulgar version of the ABC/hussein network. I really just don’t get why we on the right would see the need to depict things with such vulgarity.

    Michelle’s logo says it quite clearly without even a bit of vulgarity. I just really wish the right would leave the vulgar to the left.

13. #113
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Republicans have no idea how much they benefit from unquestioning reporters shoveling their s**t.

    getting a tad testy there sporto! IF you think republicans are benefiting from anything reporters do, well, we gotta lake called Optima here in Oklahoma we’ll sell ya.

14. #114
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Uh-oh…

    The moonbat Statist organs are turning on the AMA…(a reliably Leftist organization until their rice bowl is threatened)

    See Jim Geraghty on their TWO MINUTE HATE tactic.

    http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWExODhiYzM3YzRjZWJhMTg1MzQ0ODQ3YWQxOTVhYjc=

    Interesting, no…???

15. #115
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:12 pm, sonofdy said:

    I was wondering when LGM would show up to defend this blatant takeover of media by the government.

    BTW an interview of bush does not equal days of government issued propoganda.

16. #116
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 11:42 am, Rogue Cheddar said:
    Prostitution has the higher moral ground than ABC!

    Better a sister in a house of ill repute than a brother in the employ of ABC (or NBC or CBS)

17. #117
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:18 pm, spaceycakes said:

    anyone? Bueller?

18. #118
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    As I said elsewhere:

    ABC — All Barack Channel

    NBC – National Barack Channel

    CBS – Clearly Barack’s Syncophants

19. #119
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    The network plans a primetime special — ‘Prescription for America’ — originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.

    Oh, so I guess there will be a ‘primetime special’ on the opposing view broadcast soon.

    Hello? Is this thing on?

20. #120
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    CW4, you forgot

    PBS–Pusillanimous Barack Suck-ups

21. #121
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    In the end, no one watching, listening to, or reading ABC News will lack for an understanding of receive all sides of these important questions.

    FIFY, Kerry.

22. #122
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Major O said:

    Again, it’s striking that the usual, so-called “thoughtful” regular lefties on this blog have nothing to say. It is always silence, smart aleck comments, or defense.

    Wondering when one of the “reasonable” will weigh in with an honest admission that this move by ABC does nothing if not give credence to conservative claims of media bias in favor of Democrats.

23. #123
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:44 pm, JonB said:

    And the 52% of voters who voted for this idiot, along with the millions of brain dead sheeple who didn’t vote at all, will believe everything they are told by the TV once again.

24. #124
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, T-Bone said:

    The Networks often give time to a President to make important speeches like the State of the Union. I don’t believe they are required to do so. They do it because the other guy is doing it and perhaps out of the spirit of patriotism. That is what they are doing here.

    One network decided they will help the cause of Nationalized Health Care which “they” support. To allow dissenting opinions would lessen the impact they want. Pure and simple. And just wrong on many levels. They could run their “60 minutes” type special on it any time they want, any way they want.

    The people in charge at ABC must feel it is their duty to support political agendas instead of just fairly representing both sides of the issue. That would be too logical and not a good use of their “power base” that they have being in charge of such a powerful entity as broadcasting info to the citizens. They can control people by controlling the info.

    This is what Alynsky and others were talking about. Leveraging your power to maintain control. Once in control, you can do what you want and work to attain more power and more control.

25. #125
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:50 pm, Misscheryl said:

    I would boycott ABC but I don’t watch it anyway.

26. #126
    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, Misscheryl said:

    ooooppsss, I hit submit too soon.

    I’d boycott the sponsors, but I don’t even know who they are.

27. #127
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, Big Hammer and Anvil said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 1:03 pm, rocketman said:
    ***
    ABC and the Left Wing Media (not MSM) is following in the hallowed traditions of George Orwell’s 1984 book–and in the molds of Pravda (truth), Hermann Goebbles (Hitler’s Germany), and Hello Hugo TV (Venezuela).

    Rocketman – wrong clubfooted minister of Propaganda. It should read:
    Josef (not Hermann)…

    Isn’t that the name of the Narcisisst in Chief’s new Czar???.

    lgm – I shold have learned to expect more from you besides “oh wait, _____ did it therefore it is all right.” Well, Hitler did this too and it is definitely not all right.

28. #128
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I would boycott ABC but I don’t watch it anyway.

    Indeed. I used to watch “Pushing Daisies” but I think the series finale was this past Saturday. So nothing on ABC for me.

29. #129
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:13 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Well, ABC, NBC (National Barack Channel), what’s the difference? They’re all in the tank for the guy, and have been for two years.

    Nothing new here.

30. #130
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:21 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Jeez, if only we had voted for McCain. It’s all our fault, just ask Atheling.

31. #131
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, Misscheryl said:

    If I ever do anything illegal…don’t send me to prison, make me watch Obama on television.

    I refuse to watch him anymore. If he was on Fox, I wouldn’t watch. As was noted on a different blog – I would rather watch paint dry than subject myself to one more moment of his obnoxious narcissism.

32. #132
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Major O said:
    Again, it’s striking that the usual, so-called “thoughtful” regular lefties on this blog have nothing to say.

    I use “thoughtful lefty” when someone asks me for an example of an oxymoron.

    Perhaps that is why they have nothing to say. They don’t exist.

33. #133
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, Big Hammer and Anvil said:

    Let’s see here, if we start to:

    Nationalize the Industrial base (check)

    Nationalize the Economonic base (check)

    Convert to a State-run media (over the top check)

    Create a private army that is loyal to the leader (vice constituion) (ACORN checks in the mail)

    Declare emergencies where none exist for the sole purpose of obtaining greater power (check, double check, ad infinitum)

    WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THIS IS THE US?

34. #134
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, NJRepublican said:

    As soon as I saw this on Drudge this morning, I hammered out a complaint to ABC through their website and in it I told them I was considering filing a complaint with the FCC. Not that any of it will do any good, but I just can’t sit by quietly and let this nation go away.

35. #135
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    And NBC can be National Board of anti-obama Censors!

36. #136
    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    New Fall line-up for ABC:

    I Survived a Government Clinic!

    Dancing with the Czars

    Better off Red

    Extreme Makeover: Economy Edition

    Supernannystate

37. #137
    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:04 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Dexter–you can’t imagine how many would watch the ‘dancing’ one. If what they have now is any indication, people will watch anything.

38. #138
    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:16 pm, RTater said:

    Um, HOMEBOYS IN OUTER SPACE ran for 21 episodes. People will watch anything.

39. #139
    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I’d watch a documentary on wood grubs before I’d watch any of the crap on the major networks these days… except for the shows my wife puts on. Ya gotta make reasonable accomodations.

40. #140
    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, sonofdy said:

    HOMEBOYS IN OUTER SPACE?????? eeertrrr

41. #141
    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:31 pm, spaceycakes said:

    How about

    ‘The Biatch-lerette’

42. #142
    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 5:31 pm, spaceycakes said:
    How about

    ‘The Biatch-lerette’

    No, I don’t think they can do a show on a sitting House Speaker.

43. #143
    On June 16th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I’d watch a documentary on wood grubs before I’d watch any of the crap on the major networks these days

    And such a documentary would probably be far more entertaining and educational, stimulating your brain cells…. instead of depleting them, which is the natural outcome of watching most major network programming.

44. #144
    On June 16th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, SHoward said:

    Um, HOMEBOYS IN OUTER SPACE ran for 21 episodes. People will watch anything.

    A few months ago I was sitting in a bar in Anaheim having a brew with a business associate, and the oversize televisions were showing —- Seguay Jowsting. You’re right – people will watch anything.

45. #145
    On June 16th, 2009 at 6:58 pm, Wade said:

    ABC’s response is exactly what I expected from them AND from elections in Iran.

46. #146
    On June 16th, 2009 at 6:59 pm, letget said:

    Fox news is the only channel that gives both sides. That means, they gotta go. Any form of news that does not give bho, in his warp view, 100% ok has to be under the bus. MM, HA, Rush, Sarah, Hannity, the list goes on and on are targets. We American’s need to say, enough!! If we can’t see what the Iran people are going through for a tiny bit of freedom, our country is next. Gotta wake up America. TEA parties anyone?
    L

47. #147
    On June 16th, 2009 at 7:21 pm, rplatt said:

    At least we are precisely identifying the enemy . . . it’s important to know your enemy.

48. #148
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:22 pm, ErinF said:

    Ok… here’s the mini-letter I sent to ABC Shmooze:

    Dear ABC:

    It’s incredibly disappointing (though, not at all surprising) that ABC News would appoint itself our new feuhrer’s first main department of propaganda. You see, THIS is why I have watched FoxNews for 8 years straight, and why I will CONTINUE to get my news from them… because they report actual NEWS, not forcefeeding socialist BS to the masses.

    I can’t wait to see what this sh!t does to your stupid ratings.

    I hope ABC fails!

49. #149
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:25 pm, ErinF said:

    It would be great if we all could get the word out to support FNC during ABC Shmooze’s obama-ass-kiss-fest on Wednesday night.

50. #150
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:25 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    From ABC’s reply:
    

    In the end, no one watching, listening to, or reading ABC News will lack for an understanding of all sides of these important questions.

    If you say so. No need to look elsewhere now.

    Wait a minute. What are the answers to the questions we’ll understand? True or false, multiple choice, or essay? Fingers crossed for true or false.

51. #151
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:33 pm, Send_Me said:

    Again we see the use of one of the three primary weapons of the Marxists: the media (the other two being the church and state-run eduation).
    “A quiet revolution can be dispersed throughout a culture over a period of time to destroy it from within. Mass psychology and media can break the traditions, beliefs and morals and the will of a nation so there is no possibility of resistance.” ~ Antonio Gramsci
    “Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity. … In the new order, Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.” ~ Antonio Gramsci
    “Of all the arts, the motion picture is the most important.” ~Vladimir Lenin
    “This weapon [cinema], which cries out to be used, is the best instrument for political propaganda, which cuts into the memory and may be made a possible source of revenue.” ~ Leon Trotsky

52. #152
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:34 pm, Ragspierre said:

    It turns out the Director of Communications for the White House Office of Health Reform, since last month, is former ABC News correspondent Linda Douglass, who left journalism last year to join the Obama campaign.

    Well, that makes it stink even more.

53. #153
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, ErinF said:

    God, I hope their ratings plummet!

54. #154
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Guess it’s time to dust off the old, familiar term whitewashing the news.

    Or is that racist in the Obamanation?

55. #155
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:44 pm, ErinF said:

    Or is that racist in the Obamanation?

    Everything is racist.

56. #156
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:51 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Gawd, now THE ONE is carping about how Fox doesn’t show him ‘da LOVE he so clearly deserves…

    http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090616181219.aspx

    What a poor, poor dear…

57. #157
    On June 16th, 2009 at 8:56 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    ABC – owned by Disney. Something to chew on…

58. #158
    On June 16th, 2009 at 9:49 pm, frontierguy said:

    ABC = Any Bailout Checks accepted.

    We don’t care how much butt we have to kiss, we want those greenbacks. If you don’t watch, we don’t care, we expect in the future for you to have much fewer choices, so you’ll end up watching us sometime.

59. #159
    On June 16th, 2009 at 9:49 pm, HappyGoLucky said:

    ABC is owned by Disney. I don’t plan on chewing on it. I plan on boycotting it, their advertisers, and their products. What matters is the bottom line, and the bottom line here is that I have extreme Obama fatigue. I can’t get a break from this guy and I sure as heck don’t want him leading the charge for health care reform. He can’t get a stimulus package together for 787 billion (or whatever ginormous amount)and we are all hurting for it. Why do I want this man meddling in my health care?

60. #160
    On June 16th, 2009 at 10:00 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    Dexter Alarius said:
    New Fall line-up for ABC:
    …
    Dancing with the Czars

    Now THAT’s funny!

61. #161
    On June 16th, 2009 at 10:03 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    saw this posted on another site:

    I have been calling ABC News at: (212) 456-7777. They will tell you that you have to leave a message with the recording thing, just tell them to connect you with the office of ABC News Senior Vice President Kerry Smith, they will. You might get an answering machine or you might get a person. BE SURE AND TELL THEM THAT YOU AND MILLIONS OF OTHERS WILL BE TUNING OUT!

62. #162
    On June 16th, 2009 at 10:06 pm, frontierguy said:

    ABC reporters refrained from then reporting studies showing we have one of the least efficient systems.

    lgm, links please. I would like you to prove what the reporters did not do. Then I would like to see the links showing that our system is one of the least efficient. The AMA booed BHO, I think I would be more interested in what experts have to say, least of all you or these reporters who have to do it with a straight face…snicker. I couldn’t even write that one with a straight face.

63. #163
    On June 16th, 2009 at 10:14 pm, James Otis said:

    Love this line:

    Indeed, we’ve already had many critics of the President’s health care proposals on the air – and that’s before a real plan has even been put before the country.

    That is, we broadcasted criticism of the President’s proposals – but we won’t broadcast criticism of a real plan. Ie. we allowed untargeted criticism of a proposal but will not allow targeted criticism based on aplan put forward.

64. #164
    On June 16th, 2009 at 11:39 pm, Speakup said:

    Here’s the official ABC News response

    User Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    Those with a view differing from the Pres. need not apply.
    This means any-one with a differing view.

65. #165
    On June 17th, 2009 at 12:51 am, vatodio said:

    I love Democrats.

    They already know what is good for me and the country.

    Cheap mortgage, lower taxes (by $13 a week), Cheap-clean green energy for my home and car, saving jobs everywhere (UAW, AIG, Teachers,…), stimulating everybody (GM, Banks, local governments,…).
    Soon the whole sky will turn into a giant pancake and all the rivers and lakes will be filled with real maple syrup. I will never go to bed hungry.

    Ahhh, the paradise!

    Folks, Please, don’t wake me up!!!!!!!

66. #166
    On June 17th, 2009 at 12:56 am, fulldroolcup said:

    lgm, you have got to have the IQ of a cherrystone clam.

    Just what does “efficient” mean? Unless it means “patients cared for in a timely and effective way”, it means nothing.

    You have been alerted to a number of articles spelling out, quite specifically, how long people in Canada and the UK, for instance, have to wait to get access to specialized care and equipment vs the US.

    You have also been pointed to articles that compare outcomes for UK patients with certain serious diseases vs. similar patients in the US. If you live in the UK, you are generally out of luck.

    Yet you persist in ignoring not just the evidence, but the frackin DATA.

    I want you to you go upstairs from your basement digs and ask your mama to straighten you out–preferably by her giving in to a lifetime of forebearance and finally taking a ballpeen hammer to your medulla oblongata.

    It would a very appropriate way to reduce your carbon footprint, by not breathing.

67. #167
    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:07 am, ErinF said:

    Gawd, everyone…

    Just please collectively ignore “lgm”. Eventually he/she/it will go away. Mindnumb libs like that get high on reactions.

68. #168
    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:28 am, atheling said:

    kapo lgm, you nitwit:

    Propagandizing socialist policy is not “warm and fuzzy”; only your brain is.

69. #169
    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:30 am, atheling said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 4:21 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    Jeez, if only we had voted for McCain. It’s all our fault, just ask Atheling.

    Well we wouldn’t have the networks kissing ass all the time, would we?

    Thanks alot for the socialism, Rogue Cheddar.

70. #170
    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:36 am, tbear44 said:

    On June 16th, 2009 at 3:50 pm, Misscheryl said:
    I would boycott ABC but I don’t watch it anyway.

    #126On June 16th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, Misscheryl said:
    ooooppsss, I hit submit too soon.

    I’d boycott the sponsors, but I don’t even know who they are.

    You and me both. Is there anyone who still watches that worthless network?

71. #171
    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:44 am, simcoe said:

    Here’s the official ABC News response.

    Yeah, yeah blah, blah, blah.

    A robust debate — that’s original. That’s what got Iran where it is today. Go on back to Egypt ‘bama.

72. #172
    On June 17th, 2009 at 2:22 am, sbw999 said:

    Here’s the official ABC News response.

    After reading that response, my BullS-O-Meter just exploded.

73. #173
    On June 17th, 2009 at 3:00 am, kcnut said:

    Fox should have counter program for this. Have sarah megyn mm mkh john bolton fred thompson and his wife mark levin rush make it a fun but truthful show.

74. #174
    On June 17th, 2009 at 7:54 am, rplatt said:

    I’m not sure Iran’s crackdown on the media is any worse than this country where a major network (ABC) has become the official propaganda arm of the Obama regime.

75. #175
    On June 17th, 2009 at 8:44 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Obama regime

    Now that’s a good phrase! Gotta use it more.

76. #176
    On June 17th, 2009 at 8:50 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:30 am, atheling said:
    Well we wouldn’t have the networks kissing ass all the time, would we?

    Thanks alot for the socialism, Rogue Cheddar.

    You’re welcome. Anything else I can do for you? Get you a nice cold bottle of Enfamil? Change your Huggies? Find you your favorite Nuk Nuk?

77. #177
    On June 17th, 2009 at 9:07 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    lgm said:

    ABC decides to do a warm-and-fuzzy on the White House and President.

    Bull?

    This isn’t a “warm and fuzzy”. This is an Infomercial about Obama’s attampt to jam through spending our money on a multi Trillion dollar Health care giveaway. There is a HUGE difference.

    So spare us the BS lgm.

78. #178
    On June 17th, 2009 at 9:23 am, Misscheryl said:

    I have been keeping track of the rassmusen presidential polls. Beginning in January, Obama’s spread was +28. It’s now +4. People are waking up. I’ve been viewing other blogs as well, and I’m not quite as pessimistic as I once was. What is really telling is that people’s opinions of this man are the same, regardless of what blogs they “associate” with. A huge number see him in the same light. If the next election is left up to the people, he’s toast. I am sure though, that this chicago thug will do anything he can to stay in office as long as he can. He’ll have to be thrown out and the sooner the better.

79. #179
    On June 17th, 2009 at 9:39 am, Misscheryl said:

    If everything was about the economy and not control they would do what would make the most sense, even to a 5th grader. Give every American citizen (I don’t know the acutal figure if you break down population vs stimulus dollars) their portion of the stimulus package. We then could buy the health care we want, send our children to college we want. We could afford to buy the homes we want, where we want. I could go on and on and on.

    The reason they don’t do this, is because it’s about keeping us dependant on THEM and who’s running this asylum – that would be congress, Obama and his cronies. Why do people like LGM defend what Obama is doing and not understand this basic concept. What is so hard about this? It’s not about helping anyone – it’s about keeping us down and them in power. It’s about controlling us and our lives.

    What I am disapointed in, is that more people didn’t stay focused. Why are we allowing the administration to side track the real issue by throwing out things that don’t address the real issue – what they are doing to us to remain in control. Obama is rushing to gain complete control.

80. #180
    On June 17th, 2009 at 11:04 am, reshas1 said:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABC%20News%20Specials

81. #181
    On June 17th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, atheling said:

    Rogue Cheddar:

    Piss off, traitor.

82. #182
    On June 17th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Oh, because I didn’t vote for the weaka$$ed candidate foisted upon us by an out of touch GOP, but instead with clear mind and conscience voted in accordance to what our founding fathers advocated, I’m a traitor? I don’t think so! I submit that your strategery for voting for a lesser communist is what worked for the liberal side. I submit that you are the traitor! Now you piss off, you GOP rumpschwab!

83. #183
    On June 18th, 2009 at 12:25 am, Thomas said:

    LOL @ cheese maverick

84. #184
    On June 19th, 2009 at 10:26 am, shanimal said:

    The Kos kids are rabid over this accusation. Why? Because in 2005 Fox News got exclusive access to the White House and the Bush Administration. Yeah, I’m not kidding. They even captured footage for DKosTV that show Brett Baier driving around the ranch with W in Texas shooting the breeze. Somehow this proves that it’s ok to have this one sided health care Obama love fest on ABC. Maybe that’s why some call these morons “moonbats”?