Comments on: Iran: What next?

By: The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MIDDAY ROUNDUP

The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MIDDAY ROUNDUP — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:34:52 +0000

[...] NY senate? – Ed Morrissey, Hot Air Obama’s futile plan for regulation – Simon Johnson, The Plank Iran–what next? – Michelle Malkin End of the debate over Abu Zubaydah – A. Serwer, [...]

By: Too Upsetting for Commentary: Bloodshed in Iran vs. Obama’s Ice Cream Parlor Trip « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:42:49 +0000

[...] American Thinker: Obama goes for ice cream while people bleed for freedom in Iran Michelle Malkin: Iran: What next? Gateway Pundit: Obama Tells Killer Iranian Regime “The World Is Watching”… Then [...]

By: Iran: What is next? « The Daley Gator

Iran: What is next? « The Daley Gator — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:26:50 +0000

[...] What is next? Michelle Malkin links this great piece by Michael Ledeen Be sure to read it all What’s going to happen?, you [...]

By: Barack Hamlet Obama–To Be or Not To Be President of The United States–Failing The Iranian Test « Pronk Palisades

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:00:36 +0000

[...] http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/16/iran-what-next/ [...]

By: Tazed and Confused

Tazed and Confused — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:56:31 +0000

Barack is a witless idiot. No leadership. None. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Neutered by North Korea and dumbfounded by Iran. He is intellectually paralyzed. He waits silently hoping that Twitter will make things all better again.

Then heads to bed and laughs at Letterman’s sophomoric antics, meanwhile hoping Hillary will handle that 3AM phonecall.

We have a president that dry-labbed his way through college and stands speechless without a teleprompter.

By: nbarry

nbarry — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:31:38 +0000

I understand the concerns of those who fear that Moussavi is just a wolf in sheep’s clothing. However, once the public’s anger is uncorked, there is no telling where it’s going to lead. In the beginning of 1775, anyone who thought that we would be fighting a long war with the British for our independence would have been thought of as daft. After all, we only wanted equal treatment before the law as Britons on the home island, and had London taken measures to accommodate us, even through compromises, there would have been no revolution.

By: TheOtherSide

TheOtherSide — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:44:59 +0000

And what name did I call you? Please do tell.

You have some serious anger issues my friend.

By: right4life

right4life — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:34:34 +0000

lmao @ right4life…if ignorance is bliss, you must be in heaven my friend.

whats good for goose is good for the gander…wacko.

By: TheOtherSide

TheOtherSide — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:31:10 +0000

loser

And what did you say about name-calling?

By: right4life

right4life — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:26:17 +0000

By voting in an ‘unvarnished hardliner’ who has opportunistically re-cast himself as a reformer?

yeah I know, but this weakens the mullahs, which is what counts…Yeltsin wasn’t exactly Washington, but he did good…and this guy can’t do any worse than ahmadinajad…and this whole incident may turn him against the mullahs..worth a shot…

By: right4life

right4life — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:24:54 +0000

On June 16th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, TheOtherSide said:
Nice try. But that is called diplomacy.

thanks for the laughs, loser.

By: TheOtherSide

TheOtherSide — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:23:26 +0000

Nice try. But that is called diplomacy.

By: Yashmak

Yashmak — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:21:26 +0000

maybe because those that are protesting would be happy to get rid of the islamic dictatorship.

– right4life

By voting in an ‘unvarnished hardliner’ who has opportunistically re-cast himself as a reformer?

The guy (Moussavi) was involved in the start-up of Iran’s nuke program, and the formation of Hezbollah. That doesn’t sound like a route to getting rid of the Islamic dictatorship there. . .it sounds like more of the same. He WAS approved for candidacy by the mullahs, afterall.

By: right4life

right4life — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:20:28 +0000

My understanding is, is that the Iranian government says that they are going to look into irregularities that have taken place. We weren’t on the ground, we did not have observers there, we did not have international observers on hand, so I can’t state definitively one way or another what happened with respect to the election.

appeasement

By: right4life

right4life — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:18:56 +0000

and now in the face of this latest outrage, we express nothing..no outrage, no condemnation, no standing with the people of iran against tyranny…

thats appesement…next obama will be bowing to the Ayatollah!!