See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Ensign Resigns Leadership Post « Grand Rants
2. The Left’s Definition of Victims & Role Models: Sonja Schmidt, on Elizabeth Edwards, Mark Levin, and Sarah Palin (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
3. Wednesday, June 18, 2009: Daily Handpicked Headlines :: Daily Uprising
4. RINO slime Ensign resigns leadership post | The TIW Blog
5. Ensign’s Affair May Prove To Be Pro-Romney | The Great Illuminator
6. Michelle Malkin » Bastard
7. Michelle Malkin » Bastard
8. Michelle Malkin » Bastard

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #723683
   On June 18th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, WarEagle82 said:

   ZeroIntelligence,

   No nerve struck here. The guy offered a wager and I responded. Gee, that sort of sounds like an interrogatory statement to me. Of course, you are the genius so what could I know.

   But, I do agree that you are “plain stupid” and “don’t need a response” but it is just so easy and so much fun to tweak you on that atheism thing. Talk about striking a nerve…

2. #723689
   On June 18th, 2009 at 12:39 pm, zeroangel said:

   WE82:

   It wasn’t a wager either you moron and you know that. He was mocking your stereotypes and clearly you went for it. So, you are not a stereotype, but he is? Brilliant.

   You want to continue the atheism thing feel free to post another item in this thread:

   http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/12/david-letterman-perv/

   …we can pick off where we left off.

   This thread is about Ensign resigning and, apparently, your pathology. Chap you there?

3. #723697
   On June 18th, 2009 at 12:47 pm, WarEagle82 said:

   ZeroIntelligence,

   Got to call on Chappy for assistance? Figures. Evidently you are not half the man you used to be. Ironically, you may never have been half the man you used to be…

   Golly, I am surprised you even know the topic of any given thread.

   And I have little interest in tweaking you on the “atheism has murdered 100 million or more in the last century.” Frankly, it is simply too easy to do and I don’t want to end up paying for your stroke recovery after Obama nationalizes health care so I’ll take a pass.

   I suspect the furry little woodland creatures are awaiting your return. Off you go like a good little support group reject…

4. #723707
   On June 18th, 2009 at 12:53 pm, zeroangel said:

   WE82:

   We both know Chappy would enjoy this trainwreck as well, with or without his participation. We are you still responding?

   But, I do agree that you are “plain stupid” and “don’t need a response”

   I posted in the other thread a response to your idiocy concerning atheism. See you there.

5. #723715
   On June 18th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, WarEagle82 said:

   ZeroIntelligence,

   The fact that you don’t NEED a response doesn’t mean I don’t sometimes enjoy watching your apoplexy on certain issues.

   And if you recall you are the one who first made the “don’t need a response” remark and I was only quoting you back to you. And here you are still responding. I guess you don’t get “irony”…

6. #723723
   On June 18th, 2009 at 1:06 pm, zeroangel said:

   You know, I guess one of the things that I find awfully frustrating is, like it or not, knuckle-dragging idiots like you are the base of the Republican Party.

   Folks like me can rely on you guys to support the military, push for a strong foreign policy, support 2nd Amendment rights, and push for a more libertarian economic policy.

   Unfortunately, we also have to swallow and put up with your ridiculous fundamentalist religiosity and your attempts to stick a knife into scientific progress. I suppose the Democrats must also be frustrated in a similar fashion when they find themselves catering to race warriors and chronic abusers of the system.

   And if you recall you are the one who first made the “don’t need a response” remark and I was only quoting you back to you.

   You really can’t read either, can you? I am not responding to your stupid taunts. I have yet to try and claim that I don’t abuse woodland animals. In fact, even if I did, it wouldn’t make you any less of an idiot.

7. #723728
   On June 18th, 2009 at 1:10 pm, WarEagle82 said:

   ZeroIntelligence,

   I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, YOU ILLITERATE DOLT.
   
   I guess your short-term memory is shot too along with any capacity for logic…

8. #723731
   On June 18th, 2009 at 1:13 pm, zeroangel said:

   …if it isn’t obvious my previous post is addressed to WE82. No doubt there are many posters on MM’s site that feel similarly as I do. There might even be some that sympathize with WE82. If the shoe fits, wear it.

   WE82:

   As for this:

   I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, YOU ILLITERATE DOLT.

   So? I didn’t say you were. I said you represent the base. Which you do. No doubt you consistently (or at least very often) vote Republican (as I do).

9. #723734
   On June 18th, 2009 at 1:17 pm, WarEagle82 said:

   ZeroLogic,

   Ah, the argument from silence. You are a true genius of the first order. Now get back to your support groups before they fetch the local constabulary to assure attendance.

   How did you get out of the “home” anyway?

10. #723743
    On June 18th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, zeroangel said:

    WE82:

    Face it, you are a stupid, stupid person. Normally I don’t resort to pointing that out to people and I prefer to use the term “ignorant.” After all, very smart peopple can be guilty of having had the education system fail them. In many cases, that is the issue.

    For you however, it’s something much worse, you clearly lack reading comprehension skills and just a basic capacity for critical thinking. Additionally, you seem rather insecure. I would pity you, but you are just such a mean-spirited jerk.

    Chap was right about you all along. You really are only worthy of ridicule. As I said, it annoys me that because of our two-party system I have to tolerate gravely demented people like you. Oh well. *shrug*

11. #723754
    On June 18th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    ZeroHumility,

    Thank you, thank you, thank your for pointing out my shortcomings and failings. I’m not worthy!

    More arrogance and ignorance from the resident elitist, arrogant atheist…

12. #723973
    On June 18th, 2009 at 5:37 pm, les said:

    On June 18th, 2009 at 8:48 am, WarEagle82 said:
    ….when they behave like animals with other people’s daughters.

    On June 18th, 2009 at 12:16 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    ….go back to accosting small woodland creatures

    On June 18th, 2009 at 12:47 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    ….I suspect the furry little woodland creatures are awaiting your return.

    WE2, what’s with this fascination of your’s with animal husbandry. Have you not been able to attract a partner yet with that big six figure income of yours?

13. #724648
    On June 19th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, Omu said:

    Isn’t it funny that conservative lowlifes like Sen. Ensign actively campaign against gay people, stating they are an abject social ill and absolutely imorral.

    Yep, I’m starting to think Conservatives/Republicans are the best at irony in the world! The “moral majority” who say gays are evil, was led by Ted Haggard. The party that started a senseless war in Iraq which cost about one million lives is where the “pro-life” movement hangs out. You guys sure must like your irony an awful lot?

14. #724735
    On June 19th, 2009 at 5:06 pm, zeroangel said:

    Omu:

    Hitchens has also expressed support for the war in Iraq. I think your characterization of the war (which I proudly served in) is unfair.