<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next: A Fatherhood Czar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:41:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Green Jobs Czar&#8221; Appointed by Obama: Communist Van Jones &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-749259</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Green Jobs Czar&#8221; Appointed by Obama: Communist Van Jones &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-749259</guid>
		<description>[...] Bomb Michelle Malkin: Alert: Car czar Steven “Chooch” Rattner is leaving; probes intensify and Next: A Fatherhood Czar? and And next: A Fine Print Czar Hot Air: Rattner’s exit prompted by probe? and Breaking: Car czar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bomb Michelle Malkin: Alert: Car czar Steven “Chooch” Rattner is leaving; probes intensify and Next: A Fatherhood Czar? and And next: A Fine Print Czar Hot Air: Rattner’s exit prompted by probe? and Breaking: Car czar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Many Czars Is Excessive? Shadow Government: Obama Has Created 32 Czars At This Point (video) &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-749173</link>
		<dc:creator>How Many Czars Is Excessive? Shadow Government: Obama Has Created 32 Czars At This Point (video) &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-749173</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: Alert: Car czar Steven “Chooch” Rattner is leaving; probes intensify and Next: A Fatherhood Czar? and And next: A Fine Print Czar bRight &amp; Early: Czar Mania CricketSoda: Obama Appoints [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: Alert: Car czar Steven “Chooch” Rattner is leaving; probes intensify and Next: A Fatherhood Czar? and And next: A Fine Print Czar bRight &#38; Early: Czar Mania CricketSoda: Obama Appoints [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 366 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-726243</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 366 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-726243</guid>
		<description>[...] ~ ITEM: Next: A Fatherhood Czar? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ~ ITEM: Next: A Fatherhood Czar? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama and the Overdo It Crew &#124; Adam's Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-725362</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama and the Overdo It Crew &#124; Adam's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-725362</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama right on Fatherhood.  (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama right on Fatherhood.  (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Send_Me</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-725235</link>
		<dc:creator>Send_Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-725235</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;High-profile athletes and celebrities&lt;/strong&gt;... will join Obama in his mission to encourage mentorship and fatherhood ahead of the Father’s Day holiday on Sunday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Riiight, because professional athletes, celebrities, and politicians so often epitomize good husbands and fathers... A bunch of witless, impotent, spoiled little boys is more like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>High-profile athletes and celebrities</strong>&#8230; will join Obama in his mission to encourage mentorship and fatherhood ahead of the Father’s Day holiday on Sunday.</p></blockquote>
<p>Riiight, because professional athletes, celebrities, and politicians so often epitomize good husbands and fathers&#8230; A bunch of witless, impotent, spoiled little boys is more like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who&#8217;s Your Headline Daddy? &#171; Countenance Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724841</link>
		<dc:creator>Who&#8217;s Your Headline Daddy? &#171; Countenance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724841</guid>
		<description>[...] Next: A Fatherhood Czar?  Which will conflict with Obama&#8217;s fatherhood prevention program, i.e. his Abortion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next: A Fatherhood Czar?  Which will conflict with Obama&#8217;s fatherhood prevention program, i.e. his Abortion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724806</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724806</guid>
		<description>Next: A Fatherhood Czar?

Nope.  No, Fatherhood Czar.

Though what Pres Obama did say about Fatherhood was fairly decent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next: A Fatherhood Czar?</p>
<p>Nope.  No, Fatherhood Czar.</p>
<p>Though what Pres Obama did say about Fatherhood was fairly decent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right_on</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724764</link>
		<dc:creator>right_on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724764</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However, history supports that the continent of Africa was predominantly Christian before Islam was born...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And before that, Shaka Zulu, the first Lord of Africa. He used the same &quot;conversion&quot; method later employed by Islamic conquerors...&quot;join us, or die.&quot; He didn&#039;t decapitate, though...he impaled non-believers...anally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, history supports that the continent of Africa was predominantly Christian before Islam was born&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>And before that, Shaka Zulu, the first Lord of Africa. He used the same &#8220;conversion&#8221; method later employed by Islamic conquerors&#8230;&#8221;join us, or die.&#8221; He didn&#8217;t decapitate, though&#8230;he impaled non-believers&#8230;anally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooMuchTime</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724749</link>
		<dc:creator>TooMuchTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724749</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Hawaii-born president’s father...

Looks to me she’s being loose with the facts as there is no viable proof that BO was born in Hawaii.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, I do believe that The B.O. was born in Hawaii. The reason we are only given a view of his &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Certification&lt;/strong&gt; of Live Birth&lt;/em&gt; instead of his &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Certificate&lt;/strong&gt; of Live Birth&lt;/em&gt; is because the &lt;strong&gt;certification&lt;/strong&gt; doesn&#039;t show the birthplace of his &lt;em&gt;parents&lt;/em&gt;.

Check your own &lt;strong&gt;certificate&lt;/strong&gt; of live birth. It has the names of your mother and father and &lt;em&gt;the names of the State(s) in which they were born&lt;/em&gt;. A &lt;strong&gt;certification&lt;/strong&gt; does not contain this data. Hawaii doesn&#039;t give out copies of the certificate, only the certification. You see, his daddy was born in Kenya and that makes The B.O. constitutionally ineligible to be the president. &quot;Naturally born citizen&quot; means both your parents have to be born in the U.S., too.

This is same reason that his college transcripts haven&#039;t been released either. It would show his daddy to be born in Kenya and be a British subject.

I&#039;m waiting for a true American whistle-blower to step up and produce The B.O.&#039;s Certificate of Live Birth or his college transcripts, a-la Daniel Elsberg. We are &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;entitled&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; to the truth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Hawaii-born president’s father&#8230;</p>
<p>Looks to me she’s being loose with the facts as there is no viable proof that BO was born in Hawaii.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I do believe that The B.O. was born in Hawaii. The reason we are only given a view of his <em><strong>Certification</strong> of Live Birth</em> instead of his <em><strong>Certificate</strong> of Live Birth</em> is because the <strong>certification</strong> doesn&#8217;t show the birthplace of his <em>parents</em>.</p>
<p>Check your own <strong>certificate</strong> of live birth. It has the names of your mother and father and <em>the names of the State(s) in which they were born</em>. A <strong>certification</strong> does not contain this data. Hawaii doesn&#8217;t give out copies of the certificate, only the certification. You see, his daddy was born in Kenya and that makes The B.O. constitutionally ineligible to be the president. &#8220;Naturally born citizen&#8221; means both your parents have to be born in the U.S., too.</p>
<p>This is same reason that his college transcripts haven&#8217;t been released either. It would show his daddy to be born in Kenya and be a British subject.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for a true American whistle-blower to step up and produce The B.O.&#8217;s Certificate of Live Birth or his college transcripts, a-la Daniel Elsberg. We are <strong><em>entitled</em></strong> to the truth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaceycakes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724743</link>
		<dc:creator>spaceycakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724743</guid>
		<description>so, the official title will be &#039;Who&#039;s Your Daddy-Czar&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, the official title will be &#8216;Who&#8217;s Your Daddy-Czar&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granite</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724693</link>
		<dc:creator>granite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724693</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On June 19th, 2009 at 2:40 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I highly recommned &quot;The River War: An Account Of The Reconquest Of The Sudan&quot;, by Winston Churchill.

Churchill not only is the author; he took part in the battle as a cavalryman, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On June 19th, 2009 at 2:40 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said: </p></blockquote>
<p>I highly recommned &#8220;The River War: An Account Of The Reconquest Of The Sudan&#8221;, by Winston Churchill.</p>
<p>Churchill not only is the author; he took part in the battle as a cavalryman, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granite</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724672</link>
		<dc:creator>granite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724672</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On June 19th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, Ragspierre said:
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Any man can be a father.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Respectfully disagree. Any (normal) male can make a baby. They are sires, at most. It takes a great deal more to be a Father.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You beat me to it.

&quot;Any man&quot; can be a sire...that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On June 19th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, Ragspierre said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any man can be a father.</p></blockquote>
<p>Respectfully disagree. Any (normal) male can make a baby. They are sires, at most. It takes a great deal more to be a Father.</p></blockquote>
<p>You beat me to it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any man&#8221; can be a sire&#8230;that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724661</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724661</guid>
		<description>When do people realize that czars are unConstitutional? It&#039;s simply a way to get around accountability in the age of transparency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do people realize that czars are unConstitutional? It&#8217;s simply a way to get around accountability in the age of transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724635</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724635</guid>
		<description>Why not have a &quot;fatherhood&quot; Czar?  It&#039;d be just another paving stone on this country&#039;s Road to Hell.

The Founding Fathers well understood that a social/political system based on minimalist government would require the people to serve as the primary check on themselves.  That&#039;s why, for example, you can find multiple affirmations from them of the necessity for a spiritual people to uphold a republic.

But since we&#039;re well into an age where personal responsibility is something to be avoided at all costs, and since we traded in the Second Coming for &lt;em&gt;Teleprompter Jesus&lt;/em&gt;(TM), to preserve public order now requires the government to step in and make illegal things which religious beliefs and personal ethics used to set the limits upon.

Minimal government requires people to govern themselves.  When enough people refuse to do that, the poor substitute is for more and more laws to try to fill in the cracks.

And thus is a totalitarian government born, one piece at a time, as people trade in their liberty and their sense of responsibility in exchange for a false sense of security and entitlement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not have a &#8220;fatherhood&#8221; Czar?  It&#8217;d be just another paving stone on this country&#8217;s Road to Hell.</p>
<p>The Founding Fathers well understood that a social/political system based on minimalist government would require the people to serve as the primary check on themselves.  That&#8217;s why, for example, you can find multiple affirmations from them of the necessity for a spiritual people to uphold a republic.</p>
<p>But since we&#8217;re well into an age where personal responsibility is something to be avoided at all costs, and since we traded in the Second Coming for <em>Teleprompter Jesus</em>(TM), to preserve public order now requires the government to step in and make illegal things which religious beliefs and personal ethics used to set the limits upon.</p>
<p>Minimal government requires people to govern themselves.  When enough people refuse to do that, the poor substitute is for more and more laws to try to fill in the cracks.</p>
<p>And thus is a totalitarian government born, one piece at a time, as people trade in their liberty and their sense of responsibility in exchange for a false sense of security and entitlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Obama Apologies! &#171; Jim Blazsik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/19/next-a-fatherhood-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-724632</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Obama Apologies! &#171; Jim Blazsik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=29472#comment-724632</guid>
		<description>[...] Next: A Fatherhood Czar? By Michelle Malkin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next: A Fatherhood Czar? By Michelle Malkin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
