Did You Know...

   

Bogus cap-and-trade statistic of the day

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2009 02:51 PM

Conn Carroll does the math:

Most problematic is their complete omission of economic damage from restricting energy use. Footnote three on page four reads, “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap. The reduction in GDP would also include indirect general equilibrium effects, such as changes in the labor supply resulting from reductions in real wages and potential reductions in the productivity of capital and labor).” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. In The Heritage Foundation’s analysis of the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation, the GDP hit in 2020 was $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that they ignore.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

Tale of 2 tribes: “Climate refugees” vs. EPA victims

May 4, 2016 07:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

Hillary Clinton sorry if any coal workers believed what she said about putting them out of business

May 3, 2016 12:44 PM by Doug Powers

hillarycoal

“Clarification,” Clinton-style!

Perfect: John Kerry opposes offshore tax havens the same way he leads by example on climate change

April 26, 2016 09:21 AM by Doug Powers

kerry9

Do as he says, not as he does!

Eco-warriors Barack & Michelle Obama make sure Earth Day smells as much like jet exhaust as possible

April 22, 2016 05:09 AM by Doug Powers

jet_exhaust

Separate international flights we can believe in!

Enjoying the weather? It’s because climate change is ABOUT TO KILL US!

April 21, 2016 05:43 PM by Doug Powers

globalwarming

Now even the nice days are BAD news


Categories: Enviro-nitwits, global warming, Media

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook