Did You Know...

   

Bogus cap-and-trade statistic of the day

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2009 02:51 PM

Conn Carroll does the math:

Most problematic is their complete omission of economic damage from restricting energy use. Footnote three on page four reads, “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap. The reduction in GDP would also include indirect general equilibrium effects, such as changes in the labor supply resulting from reductions in real wages and potential reductions in the productivity of capital and labor).” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. In The Heritage Foundation’s analysis of the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation, the GDP hit in 2020 was $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that they ignore.

Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

DiCaprio supports belief-based test to hold office (Out: Theocracy – In: Leo-cracy?)

September 22, 2017 03:25 PM by Doug Powers

And he said this to John Kerry no less!

Jet-set former SoS hails jet-set celeb who ‘walks the walk’ on combating climate change

September 20, 2017 05:06 AM by Doug Powers

Eco-hypocrite powers, ACTIVATE

Newsweek hails Al Gore for predicting eventual-but-inevitable powerful hurricane

September 10, 2017 08:14 AM by Doug Powers

NostraDUHmus

Texas/GOP-hating Prof’s karma runs over own dogma

August 29, 2017 03:38 PM by Doug Powers

Think before you tweet


Categories: Democrats, Donald Trump, Education, Enviro-nitwits, global warming, GOP