Did You Know...


Bogus cap-and-trade statistic of the day

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2009 02:51 PM

Conn Carroll does the math:

Most problematic is their complete omission of economic damage from restricting energy use. Footnote three on page four reads, “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap. The reduction in GDP would also include indirect general equilibrium effects, such as changes in the labor supply resulting from reductions in real wages and potential reductions in the productivity of capital and labor).” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. In The Heritage Foundation’s analysis of the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation, the GDP hit in 2020 was $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that they ignore.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

Climate change getting so bad the State Dept. has issued a worldwide travel warning

November 24, 2015 09:49 AM by Doug Powers


Way to go, climate deniers!

Bill Nye the Authoritarian Guy: Get toxic climate change deniers ‘out of our discourse’

November 9, 2015 06:44 AM by Doug Powers


Submit, fossil fuel-burning heretics, or the Climate Crusaders will hunt you down in a 747

Sex in the balance: CNN sounds alarm about the latest thing climate change is killing

November 6, 2015 10:19 PM by Doug Powers


If you can’t get a date you can always jump a shark

Climate change crusader Jerry Brown’s hopes of becoming an oil baron dashed

November 5, 2015 10:07 AM by Doug Powers


There will be hypocrisy

Private jet-set Bill Gates: Free market won’t save the world from ravages of ‘climate change’

November 3, 2015 09:14 AM by Doug Powers


Climate Change Vista

Categories: Enviro-nitwits, global warming

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook