Did You Know...

   

Bogus cap-and-trade statistic of the day

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2009 02:51 PM

Conn Carroll does the math:

Most problematic is their complete omission of economic damage from restricting energy use. Footnote three on page four reads, “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap. The reduction in GDP would also include indirect general equilibrium effects, such as changes in the labor supply resulting from reductions in real wages and potential reductions in the productivity of capital and labor).” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. In The Heritage Foundation’s analysis of the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation, the GDP hit in 2020 was $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that they ignore.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

The Day After the Day After Tomorrow: Leo DiCaprio to produce ‘post apocalyptic’ climate change film

February 2, 2016 09:45 PM by Doug Powers

goreleo

Meanwhile, script for “Hypocrite-World” unlikely to get Hollywood green-light

Al-mageddon hath arrived: A decade ago today, Gore issued his 10-year doomsday warning

January 26, 2016 12:22 PM by Doug Powers

gorebear

Is it getting hot in here or is he crazy?

Leo DiCaprio calls for end of fossil fuel dependence at World Economic Forum & Private Jet Parade

January 22, 2016 05:23 AM by Doug Powers

kerrydicaprio

Hypocrite see, hypocrite do

If Bernie Sanders & Michael Moore want to take Flint’s water problem to the top, here’s where they should start

January 17, 2016 10:50 PM by Doug Powers

epa

Aim higher

Clueless people: Bette Midler explains unseasonably warm NYC Christmas week to the ignorant and selfish

December 23, 2015 09:41 AM by Doug Powers

midler

Paris climate agreement not brewing fast enough?


Categories: Enviro-nitwits, global warming, Hollyweird

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook