Did You Know...

   

Bogus cap-and-trade statistic of the day

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2009 02:51 PM

Conn Carroll does the math:

Most problematic is their complete omission of economic damage from restricting energy use. Footnote three on page four reads, “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap. The reduction in GDP would also include indirect general equilibrium effects, such as changes in the labor supply resulting from reductions in real wages and potential reductions in the productivity of capital and labor).” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. In The Heritage Foundation’s analysis of the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation, the GDP hit in 2020 was $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that they ignore.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

HERO: John Kerry will spend Election Day crop-dusting planet with jet exhaust to fight climate change

November 7, 2016 06:05 AM by Doug Powers

penguin1

Far away on Election Day

Jill Stein calls to mobilize for war like after Pearl Harbor, except the enemy is climate change, or something

October 12, 2016 08:59 PM by Doug Powers

ratched

One Flew Over the Carbon Neutral Cuckoo’s Nest

Science! Reporter reminds America that if Paris Agreement goes as planned, we may have seen our last hurricane

October 7, 2016 01:37 PM by Doug Powers

climate

The climate Kool Aid has worked wonders

Good news! Leo DiCaprio has disqualified himself from ever holding public office

October 4, 2016 12:21 PM by Doug Powers

obamadicaprio1

The hypocrisy will go on


Categories: 2016 Campaign, Barack Obama, Enviro-nitwits, global warming, Hollyweird

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook