Did You Know...

   

Bogus cap-and-trade statistic of the day

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2009 02:51 PM

Conn Carroll does the math:

Most problematic is their complete omission of economic damage from restricting energy use. Footnote three on page four reads, “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap. The reduction in GDP would also include indirect general equilibrium effects, such as changes in the labor supply resulting from reductions in real wages and potential reductions in the productivity of capital and labor).” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. In The Heritage Foundation’s analysis of the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation, the GDP hit in 2020 was $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that they ignore.

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:
Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

Fanboy of scare monger Al Gore accuses conservative of scare mongering about Ebola

October 2, 2014 09:31 PM by Doug Powers

colmestantaros

But cow flatulence could spell the end of civilization

Of course: Guess what might be to blame for the first ever diagnosis of Ebola in US

September 30, 2014 09:46 PM by Doug Powers

obamamicroscope

Diagnosis climate change

Inconvenient weightlessness: Latest scare tactic highlights gravity of ‘climate crisis’ desperation

September 30, 2014 09:27 AM by Doug Powers

gravity

Don’t let go of Al Gore!

Obama fires up Air Force One, Marine One, huge motorcade to deliver climate change warning at UN

September 23, 2014 01:33 PM by Doug Powers

obamacoffee

Plus: Coffee salute

Wow, Al Gore has lost so much weight that he makes a Prius look like a Chevy Suburban SUV

September 23, 2014 10:01 AM by Doug Powers

suburban

Clown car of hypocrisy


Categories: Al Gore, Enviro-nitwits, global warming

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook