…you people have always fought against the American Civil Rights Movement and now you fight against the first biracial President – but you claim to support Iranian civil rights.

How funny is that?

Your first statement about “American Civil Rights” is a historical fallacy, not that you’d know anything about actual history. There have been numerous Civil Rights Acts since 1866, and a majority were solidly opposed by the Democratic Party. The fact of the matter is that Democrats (James Byrd and Albert Gore, Sr. in particular) attempted to filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 1964. If you want to read a bit about your party’s racist roots, check THIS out.

Regarding your assertion that our opposition to Obama (“the first biracial president”) is racially motivated. That is like saying that Thomas Sowell’s and Walter Williams’ opposition to Bill Clinton’s health care takeover was racially motivated. If a Black person is able to oppose a White man’s policies, but Whites cannot do the same regarding a Black man’s, then that is a politically-motivated idea, not a moral or rational one. It is the thought-process of a fanatic, not a patriot.

If we cannot oppose someone’s political schemes because of his SKIN COLOR and familiar racial and cultural origins, you are arguing on the side of tyranny against free speech. Your position is also utterly irrational, since it condemns ALL opposition to political leaders of African decent, whether they be liberal American or those who propagate the massacre in Darfur.

Question: Were you influenced by McCain/Graham speaking strongly on Iran?

Obama snarks: What do you think?

Reporters laugh.

That’s an interesting rhetorical question by Obowma, because that reply is a dodge, regardless of what he implied with it. The fact is, as with Bill Clinton’s dodges and flat-out prevarications, we will NEVER hear an honest truthful statement by this man, unless you hear it from a recording of him speaking to his America-hating, socialist-fanatical base.

On June 23rd, 2009 at 7:44 pm, teachem2 said:

On June 23rd, 2009 at 7:37 pm, moonshot said:

That was pathetic and dispicable.

Not to mention entirely offensive.

BUT, I can’t help but wonder if perhaps the q about Iran “diplomats” being invited to party with the US on the 4th of July should have been reworded, a la: “Shouldn’t some of the ‘freedom fighters’ from Iran be invited to our 4th of July celebration instead of those who repress them?”

Makes my blood boil!!

No academic records indicating the superior scholastic achievement up until joining Harvard Law (most likely a beneficiary of Affirmative Action).

More than decade long associations with low-life scumbags Ayers and Wright.

A product of Chicago thug politics with charming personality and great teleprompter reading skills.

Almost two years on campaign trail with all the liabilities for anyone to find.

Still this guy gets elected the President of United States.

I don’t know who is stupider:
Voting public blinded by hatred of Bush.
Or
The media because they wanted to see (and create) a historic first of an African American elected to the presidency.