Bad taste award

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 25, 2009 12:21 PM

I don’t find anything funny about the Sanford affair. It’s the mom in me thinking about four handsome boys on Father’s Day weekend abandoned by their stupid, selfish father, who was busy tanning with his mistress in Argentina. Heart-breaking. Yes. Nauseating. Yes. Maddening. Yes. Funny? No.

Cruel derision crude humor are to be expected of the Left.

But can Beltway conservatives Republicans keep their cracks to themselves? Today’s bad taste award goes to Grover Norquist:

“It’s not helpful,” said Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform. “This is a guy who clearly could have been in the running as a serious presidential candidate with a serious record of cutting taxes and cutting spending.” But Norquist tempered his gloom with a joke. “It does indicate that men who oppose federal spending at the local level are irresistible to women.”

Just what we need: Beltway conservatives Republicans showing how tone-deaf and insensitive they are for the sake of a self-aggrandizing soundbite.

Gag.

Posted in: GOP

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Nationalized Healthcare and Reagan tells jokes about the Soviet Union « Jim Blazsik
  2. The Other McCain: Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comment
  3. When Republicans Don’t Take the High Road (updated) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  4. The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : A Farcical Affair
  5. Yes, Sex Sells: Media Gives More Attention to Sanford’s Affair Than Illegal Firing of Inspector General Getting Too Close to Truth Behind Obama’s Cronies « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  6. Jules Crittenden » His Inner Kerry
  7. Mark Sanford Affair: Below the Belt and the Border II | Conservative Political Report
  8. Conyers, the wife of Dem U.S. Rep. John Conyers pleads Guilty of Bribery « Goodtimepolitics
  9. UPDATED: South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford admits affair! Top 10 Democrat Sex Scandals « Goodtimepolitics
  10. When Will Mark Sanford’s Sorrowful Mid-life Crisis Press Coverage Come to an End? « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  11. Sarah Palin Candid about Her Surprise Resignation: Bipartisan Reformer, Conservative, Not a Lame Duck « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #728948
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, max said:

    d’oh, ok ok, before mea culpa, Jefferson was already a widower (presumably) when he was supposed to have taken his house slave Sally Hemmings to his bed and had children out of wedlock with her…

  2. #728964
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, Salt said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, max said:

    Ronald Reagan

    Who are: Former Presidents who broke their marriage vows and would therefore not be former Presidents if numerous MM posters had their druthers…

    I have not seen anyone here equate divorce as being on par with marital infidelity.

    Reagan is a poor example for this due to the fact that his first marriage ended in part because of his political ambitions, not because he was unfaithful.

  3. #728970
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:10 pm, max said:

    Reagan is a poor example for this due to the fact that his first marriage ended in part because of his political ambitions, not because he was unfaithful.

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but I believe it’s been pretty well established he dallied while still married to J. Wyman….

  4. #728973
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, Salt said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This Stanford guy is way different than regular conservatives – the Stanfod guy is into WOMEN!

    Pay attention, ILMC. His name is Sanford.

  5. #728982
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, Yashmak said:

    Governor Sanford was willing to turn away Federal funds to burnish his reputation in the conservative movement.

    – lgm

    Of course, it couldn’t have been because he believed it the right thing to do, could it? You’re really incapable of seeing a positive act by a conservative as, well, positive, aren’t you?

    These guys are just as dishonest in their public lives as in their private lives.

    – lgm

    Then they are in good company with many of their Democratic congressional counterparts. The only difference is, we call for the resignation of those who do wrong in our party, and they actually admit their wrongdoing.

    How’s Jefferson been doing lately? Oh that’s right, defeated by a Republican after having never owned up to his acceptance of bribes, and now awaiting trial in Virginia.

  6. #728983
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, Salt said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:10 pm, max said:

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but I believe it’s been pretty well established he dallied while still married to J. Wyman….

    I have not read that. In fact, the speculation was quite the opposite in that some thought that Wyman cheated with her co-star, Lew Ayres.

    The other theory I’ve read was his obsession with politics.

  7. #728984
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, Misscheryl said:

    3:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:
    This Stanford (sic) guy is way different than regular conservatives – the Stanfod guy is into WOMEN!

    yeah, unlike Bawnie Fwank…

  8. #728992
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:18 pm, max said:

    I have not read that. In fact, the speculation was quite the opposite in that some thought that Wyman cheated with her co-star, Lew Ayres.

    The other theory I’ve read was his obsession with politics.

    I’ll happily defer to that…i had read it somewhere and shouldn’t oughta have gone repeatin’ it…

  9. #728997
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:20 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, max said:
    it’s fairly well established that RR cheated on Jane Wyman with numerous Hollywood starlets…

    Valid references, please? How ’bout if we play this the other way around?
    No evidence that RR cheated on Wyman. Now, he may have been a ladies’ man after his divorce, and I would argue that that is very different.

  10. #729018
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, DBNinKY said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This Stanford guy is way different than regular conservatives – the Stanfod guy is into WOMEN!

    I can’t believe you – unemployment figures rose to 627,000 this week and all you can find to talk about is South Carolina’s governor?!

    How about maybe suggesting some ways we can get of this economic mess, or are you hindered by the fact our president is now a Democrat?

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=anCtVrRFvn1U

  11. #729062
    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, sonofdy said:

    Ilovemycountry are you trying to say its a negative thing to be gay? How bigoted of you. Off to the PC re-education camp for you!!!

  12. #729096
    On June 25th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, cheapseat said:

    dbninky; this unemployment news is irrelevant because it’s only those rich wall street jerks being laid off don’t you know. the gm ceo got canned, and so did 626,999 other greedy rich ceo’s. the workers paradise is definitely on the rise, as the poor are getting all the good jobs now. even the oracle of omaha who backed obama to the hilt is saying the obama plans aren’t working. but we all know that prosperity under barry carter is “just a day away, tomorrow, tomorrow.”

  13. #729101
    On June 25th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, John Deaux said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, sonofdy said:
    Ilovemycountry are you trying to say its a negative thing to be gay? How bigoted of you. Off to the PC re-education camp for you!!!

    Red State Skeptic needed company.

    Hypocrisy, thy name is ILMC!

  14. #729108
    On June 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Holy-Teabagging-Hillbillies!

    You guys figured me out!

    Who knew: home schooling, squirrel eating and inbreeding could make people so smart?

  15. #729119
    On June 25th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    Ilovemycountry, WOW, way to confirm your racist, bigoted nature. I was joking before, but now I am simply in awe of your blind hatred. A KKK grand dragon could not have produced a better statement filled with generalizations and racist hatred. You truely have earned the title of the most hated filled, bigoted, irrational post of the day.

    Congratulations!!! Your mother would spit on you in disgust.

  16. #729124
    On June 25th, 2009 at 5:08 pm, Speakup said:

    Like what I wrote yesterday:

    If Gov. Sanford was a Democrat an affair would be great news, since he’s a Republican its a career ender, this just means lefties can’t get any and righties get too much.

    Speakup on June 24, 2009 at 6:10 PM

    Its a gig aimed at libs, so vehement in their hypocrisy.
    More fed up with the piling on than a joke.
    I do feel empathy for Sanfords family, him..none, it seems though that no matter how punishing the consequences, it keeps happening and left right north south, moral set, doesn’t seem to make much difference.
    Doesn’t mean we can’t expect better though and the anger is sure understandable.
    I’ve had, like lots of folks, plenty of it.

    Maybe its my fault.

  17. #729140
    On June 25th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, Misscheryl said:

    4:46 pm, Ilovemycountry said:
    Holy-Teabagging-Hillbillies!

    You guys figured me out!

    Who knew: home schooling, squirrel eating and inbreeding could make people so smart?

    Name calling..sigh

  18. #729171
    On June 25th, 2009 at 6:51 pm, zorro said:

    Beltway Republicans = Democrap Lite.

    I have no interest in what those milquetoast republicans have to say, jokes or otherwise.

  19. #729287
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:20 pm, Papa Louie said:

    These bad apples make it harder for republicans to talk about values. In fact that’s precisely why democrats make such a big deal about it when a republican’s involved — well that and their perverse enjoyment of kicking people when they’re down. But the democrats have an even bigger problem to overcome than republicans do in the next election: the “tax and spend” label their party can’t shake.

    In the past they have sometimes admitted to the tax and spend label, like when Mondale campaigned on a promise to raise taxes. At other times they have promised to raise taxes only on the rich and give everyone else a tax break. Clinton and Obama both made that pledge while campaigning. But we found out very quickly that their fingers were crossed behind their backs when they made that promise.

    It is easier to keep a pig out of the mud than it is to keep a democrat from raising taxes and increasing spending. They just can’t help themselves. I’m curious to see how democrats defend their behavior when the next election comes up. I’m absolutely sure what one of their excuses will be: “We had to do it to save the planet from all the problems we inherited from Bush…”. But that still won’t explain why things got worse.

  20. #729392
    On June 26th, 2009 at 12:33 am, emjem24 said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    I say beggars can’t be choosers. And as voters, we are begging for politicians who are worth a damn to do their job. I think we can all agree that Rudy Giuliani, for example, was a great politician, and it would be a crying shame if the city of New York was deprived of his service because of what he had going on in his bedroom.

    While you make the point that politicians aren’t “perfect” I find your trotting out conservatives expecting “perfection” a little disingenuous. We all live in the real world. However, aren’t you just a bit tired of all the liars, schemers, cheaters, fraudsters, exploiters of both political parties? The problem with both parties these days is TRUST. I want politicians to do their jobs but when they’re entangled in all matter of affairs such as recent governers, the mayor of LA, and Clinton, it erodes constituents’ trust and sense that these politicians don’t really give a damn for anybody else but themselves.

    While I like Giuliani, and value the hard work he put in cleaning up NYC, he’s done some not quite honest, above-board things that would engender trust in a potential constituent. He’s not the most “faithful” type- just ask his first wife. As a NY voter, the state is in turmoil and has been for years because a lot of these politicians are not living in the real world. They only pretend they do.

    It’s incredible that conservatives have this litany of orthodoxy where not only do you have to be anti-tax, pro-life, pro-death penalty, pro-school choice, pro-war, anti-regulation, anti-gay, anti-welfare, and all the rest — but you also have to be a boy scout! You would have an easier time finding people who drive minivans, smoke parliaments, and wear blue on Tuesdays than you would finding an elected official who meets your “true conservative” test.

    There are all types of conservatives and the conservative movement is a lot more complex and diverse than the right-wing bigotry you often portray. How often do Dems apply orthodoxy to get people to faithfully trot along? How many Dems posed as moderates or even conservatives but cave and never stand up for things they alleged in their campaign such as Sen. Casey’s pro-life position, or those blue-dog Dem fiscal warriors?

    You see, all politicians say one thing and yet never follow through on their campaign “pledges.” Is that what we seek in public servants now? How good you can run a campaign and make a slick speech only to dissolve into a puddle of mush when you’re too weak to stand up and give a damn?

    The true “conservative” test is the following:

    SAY WHAT YOU MEAN AND MEAN WHAT YOU SAY.

    That’s it. There’s no a), b), or c) answers. I can’t believe that so many people like you are so willing to lower the bar in politicians that even marriage vows have no meaning. Even campaign “promises” ring hollow now. When politicians can’t even lead by example such as the President who can’t seem to kick his nicotine habit but demands that all Americans must make sacrifices in their healthcare, it just rings a bit hollow to me.

    You don’t have to be a “boy scout” to be a politician but you can’t be a dirtbag either. The military needs strong leaders and if those leaders don’t lead by example, morale breaks down. That’s why when bad apples get found they’re usually drummed out or carted off to Fort Levenworth. Better yet, if military members cheat on their spouses they can be drummed out of the military. It still applies.

    And it should apply to politicians of ALL POLITICAL PERSUASIONS. That is why there is an HONOR CODE in the military academies and the different branches of the military. If you steal, lie, cheat, or commit a crime you can’t remain in the military.

    Nor should you remain in political office doing the very same things.

You must be logged in to post a comment.




HotAir GreenRoom