See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On June 25th, 2009 at 8:49 am, JHSII said:

   Have Republicans been invited to any White House summits since The One took office?

   Other than the usual token Republicans, that is.

2. #2
   On June 25th, 2009 at 8:58 am, Misscheryl said:

   but, but, but I thought robust debate was a good thing?

3. #3
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:01 am, Misscheryl said:

   “The balance of the views inside the room at today’s White House immigration summit does not reflect the views of the American public..”

   Well d’oh, what about “today’s White House,” or congress reflects anything of the American public? Z.I.P.

4. #4
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:04 am, Speakup said:

   The Pres. is only doing whats fair, right?

5. #5
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:13 am, babbledabble said:

   Just one more thing getting rammed down our throats before we can blink.

   The One will have the entire country destroyed in his first year. What is he going to do after that? Rest on his laurels? (On the 7th day He rested)
   Take over the rest of the world?

6. #6
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:17 am, maisy said:

   What do you expect when you have a fascist dictator nd his cronies running the government….running the government into the ground….
   Meantime is this pubescent
   “leader” doing anything about the threatening N Korean enemy?

7. #7
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:19 am, Flyoverman said:

   I have this vision of illegals crossing the border and the first thing they see is an ACORN rep holding a fistful of voter registration forms.

8. #8
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:21 am, WarTip said:

   Debate? Haven’t you heard? Didn’t you get the memo? We do not need any debate now. Nor do we need anything remotely resembling facts, figures or statistics … the consensus is in … and that’s all I have to say about that.

9. #9
   On June 25th, 2009 at 9:27 am, Misscheryl said:

   WarTip – thaaaattttsss right! But we need to hurry up! It’s “it is vital” to the health and wellbeing of all Americans throughout this great land. Hurry! Hurrryyyyyyyyy!!!!!

   /sarc

10. #10
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:30 am, babbledabble said:

    Maisy – He doesn’t have time to think about No Ko, he is too busy destroying this country. He’ll get around to the rest of the world next year. And if they nuke Alaska or Hawaii before then, well that’s just fewer people to provide free health care for. Not to worry.

11. #11
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:35 am, WarTip said:

    Run Obama Ruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun!

    Can I get an Amen? LOL

    Okay, maybe I just need another cup of coffee but …

    Or would this more closely resemble a “Chance the Gardener” moment where he just likes to watch?

    Whatever it is, it certainly looks like a bad movie … maybe more akin to Resident Evil now that I think about it … “The nightmares don’t bother me anymore. Whenever I wake up, it’s always worse.” but that would require someone to actually see what is going on around us which certainly seems to rule out anyone in this administration on either side of the political aisle.

12. #12
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:43 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Have “robust debate””? Not this Man Child who has never been told No in his life, who has studied at the feet of Frank Marshall Davis, attended the Sol Alinsky School, worshiped Black Liberation Theology, Friend of Ayres, beloved of the Alphabet Networks and love interest of Chris Matthews.

    Amnesty may well be bad for America, the American worker, devastating to our schools, social service and hospitals but that does not matter as it is not about us-It is about him- we have entered the Cult of Personality. The Cult of Personality is an angry and hungry god as as with the gods of Canaan it demands not only obedience but sacrifice-it will be your only god.

    You can wait for the knock on the door and William Ayres’ camps or get busy and resist; politically while we can by other means when that action is taken from us. No Bill of Negative Rights will stop this The One and Dear Leader.

    Keep your powder dry good people.

13. #13
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:47 am, Thomas said:

    The thing is, this is exactly the kind of railroading that would have occurred if John McCain had won the White House.

    Opinion is not fact.

14. #14
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:59 am, LC Scott said:

    So whos phone do we have to melt down?

15. #15
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:00 am, LC Scott said:

    Who’s
    PIMF

16. #16
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:12 am, Speakup said:

    RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

    Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals

17. #17
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:20 am, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah
    

    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:19 am, Flyoverman said: I have this vision of illegals crossing the border and the first thing they see is an ACORN rep holding a fistful of voter registration forms.”

    I have a similar dream/nightmare but its of Americorp, Obama Peace Corps, Acorn and US Chamber of Commerce workers signing these folks up throughout central and south america so they are ready to be bused up the NAFTA Superhighway to new Obama ReEmployment Camps throughout the US.

18. #18
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:20 am, Solo said:

    Opinion is not fact.

    Heard of McCain-Kennedy?

19. #19
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:23 am, Weary Citizen said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:47 am, Thomas said:

    Opinion? It’s a fact. Mcamnesty and obummer have the same opinion on this issue (one contrary to the vast majority of Americans). Have you forgotten all the “biggot” and “nativists” etc remarks from mcamensty and his marry band of amensty supporters?

    Its amazing to me that this even keeps being brought up. The American public made it loud and clear that they want enforcement and tougher border protections 2 times. But these sleaze pols keep trotting it out there hoping they can ram it through before anyone can speak up. Amensty will be the death knell for this country. It isn’t 6-8M as they say. It will be 30M (mark my words), combined with a rush of more to get in on it, then a wave of “family reunification” immigrants (which was about 3 to 1 from the 1986 amensty), followed by a new illegal immigraiotn wave waiting for their citizenship. We will grow our population over 100M in a decade, made up primarily of uneducated/illiterate people who will require government assistance. This is a disaster if it goes through. The answer to this cancer is ELIMINATE THE MAGNETS (no jobs, no welfare, no anchor babies as a start) that draw and keep them here. ATTRITION will become the norm and those here will leave over time and others will not come as there is no advantage for them. It will take decades to fully heal the problem but it took decades to get to the sad state we are in now. It is not the false dichotomy of choices of amnesty or mass deportaion as the open borders nuts claim.

20. #20
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:29 am, Tazed and Confused said:

    ‘nuther mutual admiration society for great leader…

21. #21
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:29 am, happyscrapper said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:59 am, LC Scott said:
    So whos phone do we have to melt down?

    #15On June 25th, 2009 at 10:00 am, LC Scott said:
    Who’s
    PIMF

    FYI…it is whose. Nice try.

22. #22
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:31 am, WarTip said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:23 am, Weary Citizen said: ATTRITION will become the norm and those here will leave over time and others will not come as there is no advantage for them.

    I think this has already begun to an extent as jobs become more scarce. Though I daresay I do wonder how many illegal alien invaders (as opposed to legal immigrants) make up the current welfare roles. As our economy and way of life continue to erode and America begins looking more and more like the place they are leaving, substantially fewer will want to risk the journey or the costs of coming here.

    Somehow I doubt that this is the administration’s goal but I do think it will happen … and it certainly is not a substitute for protecting our borders.

23. #23
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:35 am, PhredE said:

    For those even remotely interested in the subject matter…

    Former CO Gov. Richard Lamm’s “I Have A Plan to Destroy America” speech (largely inspired by Victor Davis Hanson’s work “Mexifornia”) -
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/lamm.asp

    Section VII is particularly applicable in this current context: “Then I would place all these subjects off limits – make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to ‘heretic’ in the 16th century – that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like ‘racist’, ‘xenophobe’ that halts argument and conversation.”

    Remember… NO AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS EVER STOPPED FUTURE ILLEGAL ALIENS FROM COMING TO THE U.S.

    White House: 202-456-1414
    Congress Main Line: 202-224-3121
    Call early and often.

    PS. Don’t tell the trolls, Richard Lamm was/is (?) a Democrat – hehehehehe.

24. #24
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:36 am, happyscrapper said:

    These a$$hats are not listening to the people who got them to DC. In fact, they seem to be doing the exact opposite on every issue. They are power-mad and have lost all their perspective and principles. Socialized health-care, illegal immigration run amok, cap and trade based on fraudulent information. And Obama wants to ram all of these things down our throats this year before we can lock and load and take to the streets. Personally, I don’t have anything to lock and load, but I do have a good supply of pitchforks, polished and ready. These criminals have to be stopped before there is no more America left to save.

25. #25
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:37 am, tarpon said:

    Just stealing the jobs Americans used to have … I bet that will be a big seller in the public.

26. #26
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:37 am, Ron said:

    Folks, give up the idea of debate, robust or otherwise, on anything this administration takes it in its head to ram down our throats or into any other orifice. Remember the mantra “Elections have consequences”? Well, we’ve just begun to see the fulfillment of that truth. Unless we can turn out some D’s next year, it’ll only get worse. It wasn’t O’s win over McCain that did this to us, BTW, it was the loss of any viable power in either House or Senate. With Pilosi and Reid in charge, and His Highness in the WH, we’re toast. So you independents who voted for this abomination, how’s hope and change working out for ya?

27. #27
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:39 am, Thomas said:

    If you want to go after the ‘no robust debate’ issue of all of this, go after the person who is actually responsible. His name is Obama. The McCain boogeyman is gone. He wasn’t elected president, you won. Congratulations.

28. #28
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:40 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    So, in a spirited effort to produce an environment for creating millions of new jobs that will trigger a robust economic recovery, the government will unleash an army of 20-30 million of the world’s poorest and least skilled non-English-speaking people into the American work force to overwhelm our social programs and drive wages down even further.

    Let’s see now: a stagnating economy, declining wages (especially on the lower end of the employment chain), commodity-driven inflation…

    Brilliant!!!! I’m sure our poorest will appreciate the increased competition from even poorer people. Time to invest in sweat shops and stoop labor plantations.

29. #29
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:43 am, PhredE said:

    NumbersUSA / Roy Beck’s excellent “Gumballs” video regarding immigration, American (US) demographics, population growth, etc.

    US Population Clock (from US Census Bureau): Current (Est.) Pop Here
    (Do you know what the current US population is today? You might be surprised)

30. #30
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:52 am, Weary Citizen said:

    Wartip said:

    I think this has already begun to an extent as jobs become more scarce.

    Yep, which is proof that the magnets should be the target.

    Though I daresay I do wonder how many illegal alien invaders (as opposed to legal immigrants) make up the current welfare roles.

    A large protion of illegals have anchor babies (misinterpretation of the 14th amendment), which makes them eligible for CHIPS, food stamps, free education, etc. Even if they don’t, it is not hard to game the system and get them. But you bring up a good point about legal immigrants on welfare. That alone shows the complete stupidity of our current immigration system. How in the world is an uneducated/illiterate person going to benefit a modern technological society? They are simply draining resources. Legal immigration should be based on the value that immigrant brings to the US, not the other way around. We want eudcated, talented, intelligent, hard working individuals to immigrate here. But it makes no sense to bring in someone who is not a net producer. We encourage lesser quality immigrants to come here becasuse they can live off the gov’t and have a better life here than they would have working in their own country. There is no risk.

    As our economy and way of life continue to erode and America begins looking more and more like the place they are leaving, substantially fewer will want to risk the journey or the costs of coming here.

    Somehow I doubt that this is the administration’s goal but I do think it will happen … and it certainly is not a substitute for protecting our borders

    I have seen this argument from open borders nuts. “Illegal immigration will stop naturally as the quality of life equalizes”. Yea, in other words, when our quality of life is equivalent to that of the 3rd world country, they will stop coming. The stupidity in that logic is unfathomable.

31. #31
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:54 am, MarcoPolo said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:37 am, Ron said:
    So you independents who voted for this abomination, how’s hope and change working out for ya?

    I didn’t vote for Obama, because I read his books, and knew what he wanted to do.

    But I didn’t vote for McCain, either, and things are working for me just about like I though they would. Since both candidates were apparently bent on socialism, I figured we might as well send the country into a high-speed descent. I voted for Baldwin, btw.

    If McCain had voted against TARP he’d be president today.

    McCain didn’t deserve my vote. I do not regret holding the GOP accountable for acting like Democrats.

    You might want to look at your agenda and see what actually drove people away from the neoconservative messages if you want to win elections again.

    Bush let us down, but he at least pretended to be a conservative when he ran. McCain didn’t even bother to do that.

    Thanks for asking!

32. #32
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:55 am, PhredE said:

    “In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”
    T. Roosevelt

    (I highlighted the most important word in the quote above for added emphasis)

33. #33
    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:59 am, tiredofit08 said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 8:58 am, Misscheryl said:

    but, but, but I thought robust debate was a good thing?

    lib-eral translation…

    we’ll let that republican in but gag him at the door…there, we had a robust debate…

34. #34
    On June 25th, 2009 at 11:03 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Just stealing being encouraged and given by employers the jobs Americans used to have … I bet that will be a big seller in the public.

    It isn’t just that they are stealing jobs. Many employers are or will be enthusiastically giving them jobs when and where they can get away with it, which should be easy with TEH ONE’s administration diliberate lack of immigration enforcement.

35. #35
    On June 25th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Send_Me said:

    This is why Congressional elections matter. But hey, I understand: the focus was on beating Obama at any cost, to include supporting the likes of McCain. Worked out well, didn’t it?

36. #36
    On June 25th, 2009 at 11:04 am, hawkeye54 said:

    we’ll let that republican in but gag him at the door…there, we had a robust debate…

    Shut up White Boy!!!!

37. #37
    On June 25th, 2009 at 11:12 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:37 am, Ron said:
    So you independents who voted for this abomination, how’s hope and change working out for ya?

    That should be a bumper sticker for all the nose-holding Republicans who can’t expand their minds to encompass why we vote. Independents and conservatives didn’t fail, NOSE-HOLDING REPUBLICANS failed.

    Come up with a better plan next time. Here’s a suggestion: stand for something!

38. #38
    On June 25th, 2009 at 11:12 am, Weary Citizen said:

    For those, “you didn’t vote for mccain so you voted for obama” republican worshipers, tell me how mcamnesty is any different on illegal immigration? Name one factual difference. Mcamnesty would sign any amnesty that came across his desk.

    MarcoPolo, same here.

39. #39
    On June 25th, 2009 at 11:25 am, Solo said:

    Mcamnesty would sign any amnesty that came across his desk.

    It can’t be argued because he admitted it during the campaign.

    MarcoPolo, same here.

    3rd.

40. #40
    On June 25th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, cheapseat said:

    can anyone out there think of one plan where someone rewarded bad behavior and didn’t see a rise in the incidents of that bad behavior. AFDC rewarded bastard children, and we are up to our a$$ in bastards including the POTUS. reagan’s congress rewarded illegal aliens in the 80′s and today we are up to our a$$ in them. hospitals charge the states for people who walk in the emergency room with no ability to pay and taxpayers pay for that, so we are up to our a$$ in uninsured citizens and noncitizens. we don’t charge mexico et al for housing their thugs in our prisons, so we are up to our a$$ in them. if you can think of one program that rewarded bad behavior which didn’t lead to more and more bad behavior please enlighten me. put on the beenie lgm.

41. #41
    On June 25th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, cheapseat said:

    You are absolutely correct. It is the exact opposite of the correct action. But that is the liberal MO. Somehow their twisted logic ends with policies in direct opposition to the problem they are trying to solve. One example, they are the champions of the environemnt and castigate poeple’s impact on the envionment (fair enough). However, at the same time they push for higher levels of immigration and amnesty. The 2 policies are in direct coflict.

42. #42
    On June 25th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    The amnesty issue defines what is the core problem with the “new” GOP. Fearing they out of the loop with a Hispanic constituency that they expect to redefine America into a permanent leftist society, a constituency which they perceive as being genetically incapable of embracing conservative principles, they cut a deal with La Raza thus selling everyone out.

    Now they are at war with us and resorting to the same lame lies that the most liberal Dems use when castigating conservatives as being bigots and backwards looking.

    Well it turns out that not only do most Americans demand border control, so do most Mexican-Americans. The GOP has foolishly sold its soul to the devil and now blames conservatives, the only people left fighting for the traditional freedoms that most Americans still want.

    GOP-RIP.

43. #43
    On June 25th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, jrgdds said:

    Voice your outrage against amnesty for illegal alien criminals! Below are Media e-mail and contact information:

    NumbersUSA
    A very good non-partisan Web based site. It is anti-amnesty and promotes reduced immigration.
    You can contact your congressmen, the president, and other polititions via pre-written or self composed faxes. This is no charge, but you can give a donation

    TV

    ABC News
    77 W. 66 St., New York, NY 10023
    Phone: 212-456-7777
    General e-mail: netaudr@abc.com
    Nightline: nightline@abcnews.com
    20/20: 2020@abc.com

    CBS News
    524 W. 57 St., New York, NY 10019
    Phone: 212-975-4321
    Fax: 212-975-1893
    Email forms for all CBS news programs
    CBS Evening News: evening@cbsnews.com
    The Early Show: earlyshow@cbs.com
    60 Minutes II: 60minutes@cbsnews.com
    48 Hours: 48hours@cbsnews.com
    Face The Nation: ftn@cbsnews.com

    CNBC
    900 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
    Phone: (201) 735-2622
    Fax: (201) 583-5453
    Email: info@cnbc.com

    CNN
    One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
    Phone: 404-827-1500
    Fax: 404-827-1784
    Email forms for all CNN news programs
    Fox News Channel
    1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
    Phone: (212) 301-3000
    Fax: (212) 301-4229

    Fox News
    comments@foxnews.com
    List of Email addresses for all Fox News Channel programs
    Special Report with Brit Hume: Special@foxnews.com
    FOX Report with Shepard Smith: Foxreport@foxnews.com
    The O’Reilly Factor: Oreilly@foxnews.com
    Hannity & Colmes: Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com
    On the Record with Greta: Ontherecord@foxnews.com

    MSNBC/NBC
    30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112
    Phone: (212) 664-4444
    Fax: (212) 664-4426
    List of Email addresses for all MSNBC/NBC news programs
    Dateline NBC: dateline@nbc.com
    Hardball with Chris Matthews: hardball@msnbc.com
    MSNBC Reports with Joe Scarborough: joe@msnbc.com
    NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams: nightly@nbc.com
    NBC News Today: today@nbc.com

    PBS
    2100 Crystal Drive, Arlington VA 22202
    Phone: 703-739-5000
    Fax: 703-739-8458
    The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer: newshour@pbs.org
    National Radio Programs
    National Public Radio
    635 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20001-3753
    Phone: 202-513-3232
    Fax: 202-513-3329
    E-mail: Jeffrey A. Dvorkin, Ombudsman ombudsman@npr.org
    List of Email addresses for all NPR news programs

    The Rush Limbaugh Show
    1270 Avenue of the Americas, NY 10020
    Phone (on air): 800-282-2882
    Fax: 212-445-3963
    E-mail: ElRushbo@eibnet.com

    Sean Hannity Show
    Phone (on air): 800-941-7326
    Sean Hannity: 212-613-3800
    James Grisham, Producer: 212-613-3807
    E-mail: Phil Boyce, Program Director phil.boyce@citcomm.com

    National Newspapers

    The Los Angeles Times
    202 West First Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
    Phone: 800-528-4637 or 213-237-5000
    Fax: 213-237-4712
    L.A. Times Contact Information by Department
    Letters to the Editor: letters@latimes.com
    Readers’ Representative: readers.rep@latimes.com

    The New York Times
    620 8th Ave., New York, NY 10018
    Phone: 212-556-1234
    D.C. Bureau phone: 202-862-0300
    Fax: 212-556-3690
    Letters to the Editor (for publication): letters@nytimes.com
    Write to the news editors: news-tips@nytimes.com
    Corrections: senioreditor@nytimes.com
    New York Times Contact Information by Department
    How to Contact New York Times Reporters and Editors

    USA Today
    7950 Jones Branch Dr., McLean, VA 22108
    Phone: 703-854-3400
    Fax: 703-854-2078
    Letters to the Editor: editor@usatoday.com
    Give feedback to USA Today
    The Wall Street Journal
    200 Liberty St., New York, NY 10281
    Phone: 212-416-2000
    Fax: 212-416-2658
    Letters to the Editor: wsj.ltrs@wsj.com
    Comment on News Articles: wsjcontact@dowjones.com

    The Washington Post
    1150 15th St., NW, Washington, DC 20071
    Phone: 202-334-6000
    Fax: 202-334-5269
    Letters to the Editor: letters@washpost.com
    Ombudsman: ombudsman@washpost.com
    Contact Washington Post Writers and Editors

    Magazines

    Newsweek
    251 W 57th Street, New York, NY 10019
    Phone: 212-445-4000
    Fax: 212-445-5068
    Letters to the Editor: letters@newsweek.com

    Time
    Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, 1271 6th Ave., New York, NY 10020
    Phone: 212-522-1212
    Fax: 212-522-0003
    Letters to the Editor letters@time.com
    U.S. News & World Report
    1050 Thomas Jefferson St., Washington, DC 20007
    Phone: 202-955-2000
    Fax: 202-955-2049
    Letters to the Editor letters@usnews.com
    News Services / Wires

    Associated Press
    450 West 33rd St., New York, NY 10001
    Phone: 212-621-1500
    Fax: 212-621-7523
    General Questions and Comments: info@ap.org
    Partial Contact Information for the Associated Press by Department and Bureau

    Reuters
    Three Times Square, New York, NY 10036
    Telephone: 646-223-4000
    Reuters Editorial Feedback
    United Press International
    1133 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036
    Telephone: 202-898-8000
    FAX: 202-898-8048
    Comments and Tips: tips@upi.com

    FAIR wants to hear about your media activism. Please send copies of your letters to journalists to
    FAIR
    112 W. 27th St.
    New York, NY 10001
    fair@fair.org

    For additional contacts including local media, please see: http://www.newslink.org or http://www.newsdirectory.com

44. #44
    On June 25th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Houston police officer shot and killed by an illegal alien. Again.

45. #45
    On June 25th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, Send_Me said:

    On June 25th, 2009 at 10:37 am, Ron said:
    So you independents who voted for this abomination, how’s hope and change working out for ya?

    Whatever makes you feel better. I don’t see how such sentiments are grounded in facts though: Obama clobbered McCain by around 8.5 million votes. All of the other candidates besides Obama/McCain brought in a whopping 1,643,758 votes. There seems to be a remainder here.