Franken-fied: Make way for (another) clown; Update: Coleman statement added

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 30, 2009 02:22 PM

It’s official. The Senate gets another buffoon. Don’t worry, Al. Bozo the VP Joe Biden’s shoes won’t be that hard for you to fill:

It is U.S. Sen. Al Franken.

The Minnesota Supreme Court today decided that Franken, a Democrat, won the highest number of votes in last year’s U.S. Senate race and deserves a signed election certificate.

The court said that Republican Norm Coleman didn’t prove that a lower court made mistakes requiring a rehearing of the case. Coleman had asked the court to order thousands of rejected absentee ballots counted. He had hoped the counting would allow him to overcome Franken’s 312-vote lead.

The court’s decision brings to an end the seven-month state fight over the Minnesota Senate race. Franken has had a lead since January and a trial court decided in April that he won the highest number of legally cast votes.

Showtime!

***

Update:

A STATEMENT FROM SENATOR NORM COLEMAN

ST. PAUL – Senator Norm Coleman today made the following statement at his home in St. Paul:

“Ours is a government of laws, not men and women. The Supreme Court of Minnesota has spoken and I respect its decision and will abide by the result. It’s time for Minnesota to come together under the leaders it has chosen and move forward. I join all Minnesotans in congratulating our newest United States Senator – Al Franken.

“Just a few last words about my legal challenge. Sure, I wanted to win. Not just for myself but for my wonderful supporters and the important values I have always fought for. I also thought it was important to stand up for enfranchising thousands of Minnesotans whose votes weren’t counted like the others were. After all, issues and politicians come and go, but voting is fundamental.

“It is the essence of democracy so I knew we needed to do everything we could to get it right.

“I am forever grateful and humbled by the people of Minnesota who have given me the honor to represent them – and even more grateful for their wisdom, courage, patience and understanding over these past several months.

“The path that I take in the future is not nearly as important today as the path that we must now — all travel on together — to strengthen our state and our nation.

“I have never believed that my service is irreplaceable. We have reached the point where further litigation damages the unity of our state, which is also fundamental. In these tough times, we all need to focus on the future. And the future today is we have a new United States Senator.

“I congratulate Al Franken and his victory in this election. He now enjoys the advantage that our Congressional Delegation has over the other 525 people on Capitol Hill: he represents Minnesota.

“I know the great ideas, the amazing work ethic and the historic ability to come together to get things done in this state will help him greatly, as it has me.

“Speaking of which, I think we all should take a moment to thank Amy Klobuchar and her staff. They have done a great job of carrying the burden of two Senators these last six months. She is an extraordinary public servant.

“I don’t reach this point with any big regrets. I ran the campaign I wanted. I conducted the legal challenge I wanted. And I have always believed you do the best you can and leave the results up to a higher authority. I’m at peace with that. As to my future plans, that’s a subject for another day.

“We live in a great country and a great state. We can all have confidence that by some path we don’t yet know – one which we can all come together to lay out – we will arrive at the better future we all seek.

“Thank you and may God bless Minnesota and America.”

Posted in: Al Franken

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Loonbox Al Franken gets Minnesota’s senate seat – Dems now with 60 senate seats #tcot #teaparty | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  2. Another Supreme Court Ruling « Around The Sphere
  3. It’s official: Stuart Smalley is going to Washington « Sister Toldjah
  4. The Obama ‘Evil Eye’ « Jim Blazsik
  5. Breaking: Minnesota Supreme Court Rules for Franken : The American Pundit
  6. Bloodthirsty Liberal » As Tehran Goes, So Goes Minnesota
  7. Al Franken: Senator ACORN vs. Michael Jackson «
  8. FrankenLiar Now Senator « DirtyRottenScoundrels
  9. GayPatriot » The Least Popular Freshman Senator
  10. Werner Patels - A Dose of Common Sense
  11. Senator Al Franken
  12. I Wanna Be Like Mc, Part II :: YankMcCain.com
  13. “The Senate gets another buffoon.” « Gunservatively!
  14. Michelle Malkin » Franken-fied: Make way for (another) clown b…/b | Img up date to you
  15. Finally! « Red Tory v.3.0
  16. Michelle Malkin — Never Can Say Goodbye « The Trough
  17. Franken wins, Coleman concedes, and Dems get supermajority « Wellsy’s World
  18. American Glob » Blog Archive » Stuart Smalley Wins Minnesota Senate Election, 50% of Americans Totally Screwed
  19. Al Franken Is an Idiotic Clown, but What Kind of Idiot Clown Is He? « Teh Resistance Blog
  20. Joe Biden vs. John Hancock and Theodore Roosevelt on True American Patriotism « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  21. ‘Liberal Democrats Control Everything, No Debate’… New NRSC Ad ‘60′ for 2010 Election (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  22. Beatles ‘I’ll Tax the Heat, I’ll Tax Your Feet’: Britain’s a Mess with Its Punishing Taxes, We’re Not Far Behind « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  23. Franken & Sotomayor Share ‘Perry Mason’ Memories… Franken Loves the Sound of His Own Voice « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  24. Shame on Obama! :slashingtongue

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #734102
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:08 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On June 30th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, edelweiss said:

    For eight very somber years, most Americans suffered under the abominable leadership of GWB. It’s now your turn to “suffer”!!!

    Legal & non-violent revenge is always sweet!

    At least you are good enough to admit we will be suffering under abominable “leadership.”

    It is also nice (in a gallows humor way) that there is another state as stupid as Massachusetts.

  2. #734107
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:16 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On June 30th, 2009 at 7:20 pm, Joy said:
    Well, isn’t this just special…

    How low can the left sink? Apparently there is no bottom.

    Al Franken is as close to bottom as you can get without actually being in hell. One of the most disgusting, despicable sub humans on the planet and he has to be from my state. I am literally gagging on this one.

  3. #734111
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:28 pm, chapoutier said:

    One of the most disgusting, despicable sub humans on the planet and he has to be from my state.

    Really? As bad as Idi Amin, Bin Laden, Charles Manson, Michael Flatley, The Joker, Dennis Rader and lgm?

    Come now. Let us not give in to hyperbole.

  4. #734116
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:36 pm, traveler49 said:

    In my line of business I meet many people from Minnesota. I won’t be able to help but think how stupid most voters are from that state. It can be turned around against me as well, being an Oregonian but not quite to the extent as Minnesotans. This last weekend I had the opportunity to meet three teachers from California. They were so upset about having to take Spanish lessons and having the Government borrow from their retirement accounts and the terrible economy and on and on. When I told them that the teacher unions were a huge reason why all of these things were happening, they could not accept it. No no, the teachers unions are good! they said. The discussion ended with me trying to convince them that the Pols the unions endorse with their heavy handed techniques and the teachers vote for in lock step are the very pols responsible for the mess. Come back, come back, I’m not finished, I exclaimed as they ran away clenching their hands to their ears. I guess no state has total ownership of fools and idiots that pull the lever in the voting booth. Some have more than others though.

  5. #734117
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:39 pm, chapoutier said:

    I won’t be able to help but think how stupid most voters are from that state.

    So you concede Franken had the most votes? Interesting. But in any case, I am sure happyscrapper would be happy to point out that Franken won a plurality, not a majority, of the votes.

  6. #734119
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:51 pm, jangar said:

    When will Minnesotans elect Mickey Mouse?

    Heck, they’ve tried just about everyone else.

  7. #734121
    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:54 pm, swede said:

    So you concede Franken had the most votes?

    He had the most votes recounted, yes.

  8. #734125
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:00 pm, chapoutier said:

    He had the most votes recounted, yes.

    You know, even Coleman never alleged fraud, as the decision today made a point to mention.

    I mean come on…its not like something crazy like 6,000 votes being switched due to a “computer glitch” occurred, right? Cause that would be totally suspicious.

  9. #734130
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:03 pm, chapoutier said:

    Sorry for the broken link.

    Try this.

  10. #734131
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:08 pm, swede said:

    You know, even Coleman never alleged fraud, as the decision today made a point to mention.

    Inconsistancies in which districts were recounted and errors. Check in with Ed Morrissey for all that. Anyway ya got your clown chap. Let us know how it works out.

  11. #734134
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:16 pm, chapoutier said:

    Inconsistancies in which districts were recounted and errors. Check in with Ed Morrissey for all that. Anyway ya got your clown chap. Let us know how it works out.

    Believe me, I am well informed of the “arguments” for fraud. Like the so- called “found” votes that coincidentally match up with the independently recorded voter registrars (i.e. sign in sheets). If you follow some of the links to the right, i am sure you can find some posts that go into greater detail from me.

    The only thing Coleman had was some argument of disparate treatment of absentee ballots county to county. Which he had zero problem with until he came out the loser under that scheme.

    He didn’t argue fraud because there was zero evidence of any.

  12. #734142
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:28 pm, swede said:

    Let’s just appoint an
    Ayatollah to decide the elections beforehand. Eliminates all this confusion.

    And you were not hiking the Appalachian trail. I smell scandal.

  13. #734143
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:29 pm, John Deaux said:

    On June 30th, 2009 at 10:28 pm, chapoutier said:

    Really? As bad as Idi Amin, Bin Laden, Charles Manson, Michael Flatley, The Joker, Dennis Rader and lgm?

    Come now. Let us not give in to hyperbole.

    The jealousy of the rhythmically challenged always displays itself.

    Care to spew a long diatribe about the evils of Zamfir, master of the pan flute?

  14. #734145
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:32 pm, chapoutier said:

    Care to spew a long diatribe about the evils of Zamfir, master of the pan flute?

    Okay. That was hilarious. Someone was a child of the 80s.

  15. #734146
    On June 30th, 2009 at 11:34 pm, cactusjoe said:

    In 1980, the Minneapolis Tribune sponsored a Minnesota slogan contest. The winner was “come fall in love with a loon”. I guess they decided to make it official.

  16. #734181
    On July 1st, 2009 at 2:00 am, Terry_Jim said:

    While my Wife may have to go to business conventions in Minneapolis every other year or so, it will be several years before my family spends another vacation in Minnesota.

  17. #734204
    On July 1st, 2009 at 2:43 am, tbear44 said:

    They must be smokin’ some good stuff there in MN! Al Franken? If this is supposed to be a joke I am not laughing. What next?

  18. #734263
    On July 1st, 2009 at 7:54 am, stillontheroad said:

    chapoutier said:

    Still does not explain why there were more voters than registered in the state.

  19. #734264
    On July 1st, 2009 at 7:59 am, ajmontana said:

    2008′ is by far the winner of Dumba$$ Voter Award. :roll:

  20. #734272
    On July 1st, 2009 at 8:13 am, chapoutier said:

    Still does not explain why there were more voters than registered in the state.

    Huh? who has made this claim?

    Look here.

    78.5% of eligible voters. Not over 100%. Now that doesn’t include registered voters, but MN has same day registration, and as you can see, the level of participation in this highly publicized election (both Senate and Presidential) is only slightly higher than the turnout for 2004.

  21. #734273
    On July 1st, 2009 at 8:15 am, chapoutier said:

    If you take registered voters, it is about 91% turnout. Still way less than 100.1%

  22. #734275
    On July 1st, 2009 at 8:19 am, chapoutier said:

    In fact, turnout was actually LOWER than what they were expecting.

    Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie predicts at least 80 percent of the state’s eligible voters will show up at the polls on Tuesday.

  23. #734278
    On July 1st, 2009 at 8:23 am, MtsEdge said:

    On June 30th, 2009 at 6:44 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Thank you.

    Coleman concedes what he previously thought was a result that created “disenfranchisement.” What, he changed his mind and now it’s not voter disenfranchisement?

    Is this how he stands up for what is right?

  24. #734279
    On July 1st, 2009 at 8:24 am, MtsEdge said:

    I’m so sick of these RINOs playing gentlemen, at our expense. RE John McCain’s entire presidential campaign.

  25. #734282
    On July 1st, 2009 at 8:42 am, babbledabble said:

    Must be something in the MN air. Electing wrestlers & comedians to represent the state. Aren’t there any semi-normal politicians in MN? Or is that an oxymoron? Weird.

  26. #734324
    On July 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am, sonofdy said:

    With a massive majority in the house and a filibuster proof senate AND obama in the white house, will the dems FINALLY stop blaming everything on the GOP????

  27. #734386
    On July 1st, 2009 at 10:25 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    chapoutier said:

    In fact, turnout was actually LOWER than what they were expecting.

    What I recall that was questionable is that in a particular area where Franken didn’t have strong support, he gained votes on Coleman. I’d say at the very least, that is suspicious. I have yet to find the article that mentioned it though.

    And in many cases… they seemed to be finding votes for Franken, but little if any for Coleman.

    From HotAir:

    Just as Secretary of State Mark Ritchie was explaining to reporters the recount process in one of the narrowest elections in Minnesota history, an aide rushed in with news: Pine County’s Partridge Township had revised its vote total upward — another 100 votes for Democratic candidate Al Franken, putting him within .011 percentage points of Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman.

    The reason for the change? Exhausted county officials had accidentally entered 24 for Franken instead of 124 when the county’s final votes were tallied at 5:25 Wednesday morning.

    Is this legitimate? A few precincts do not use the optical-scan ballot, and apparently Patridge Township is one of them. Leaving off a digit in a vote count can happen when tallying by hand. Still, as the days wore on this week, all of those “corrections” appeared to be going in a single direction — towards Franken.

    Hot off the press, the first apparent evidence of fraud. Last night at around 7:30, a precinct in Mountain Iron, St. Louis County, mysteriously updated its vote total to add 100 new votes–all 100 for Barack Obama and Al Franken.

    Mountain Iron uses optical scanning, so the Coleman campaign asked for a copy of the tape documenting the ballots cast on election night. St. Louis County responded by providing a tape that includes the newly-added 100 votes, and is dated November 2–the Sunday before the election. St. Louis County reportedly denies being able to produce the genuine tape from election night, even though Minnesota law, as I understand it, requires that tape to be signed by the election judges and publicly displayed.

    So I have my doubts as to the legitimacy of the re-worked vote tally.

  28. #734452
    On July 1st, 2009 at 11:19 am, chapoutier said:

    Re: the time stamp issue. Officials noticed the day of the election that the stamp was wrong, but they could not change it at that point. It was not, as Hot Air said, officials “denying” access to the actual tape. That was the actual tape with the wrong date.

    Re:

    Still, as the days wore on this week, all of those “corrections” appeared to be going in a single direction — towards Franken.

    That is just wrong. Plenty of times Coleman increased his lead during the recount. I recall in the days after the election following the Star Tribune’s running tally as precincts recounted and submitted their results. It was a roller coaster.

    Again, all these precincts had, for lack of a better term, sign in sheets. In every instance of “found votes”, such as in the example of the 124/24 votes, the revised vote totals correlated with the independently gathered voter tallies on the sign in.

  29. #734581
    On July 1st, 2009 at 12:58 pm, shimauma2 said:

    and this is what coleman gets for his pansy ass libtard votes. He was a Rino in true form

  30. #734585
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:01 pm, Major O said:

    So a US court speaks, the Congress agrees and Franken is seated and everyone is happen.

    A court and congress in a foreign country speak, Obama disagrees with them and he decides they are out of line and in doing so Obama lines himself up with Castro and Chavez.

    Wow.

    Most excellent point. How does Obama defend this?

  31. #734592
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Most excellent point. How does Obama defend this?

    He doesn’t have to. He is God.

    By the way, it just hit me…Norm Coleman has lost elections to both Al F’ing Franken AND Jesse Ventura. Now THAT is what you call a LOSER!

  32. #734612
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:21 pm, Socky said:

    Minnesota has a system of “same day registration,” where you can show up, register, and vote on the spot. All you need is a school ID or even a utility bill or rental receipt, which are easy to fake (not that anyone will be checking). It’s a system ripe for abuse. It’s only too easy for out-of-state college students or a couple busloads of ACORN voters from Chicago to be parachuted into marginal precincts to up the vote for the Demonrats.

  33. #734621
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:32 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:21 pm, Socky said:
    Minnesota has a system of “same day registration,” where you can show up, register, and vote on the spot. All you need is a school ID or even a utility bill or rental receipt, which are easy to fake (not that anyone will be checking). It’s a system ripe for abuse. It’s only too easy for out-of-state college students or a couple busloads of ACORN voters from Chicago to be parachuted into marginal precincts to up the vote for the Demonrats.

    HOW, in the name of all that is sane, did we come to this level of stupidity? If we lose the integrity of our elections, we lose everything! Apparently, we have all been sitting around with our heads in the sand (or elsewhere), just letting it all happen.

  34. #734622
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:33 pm, Socky said:

    We got here because Demonrats wanted to make voting easier, in full knowledge that when you make voting easier, you make vote fraud easier. (Don’t believe for a second they didn’t know exactly what they were doing.)

  35. #734626
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:36 pm, chapoutier said:

    All you need is a school ID or even a utility bill or rental receipt, which are easy to fake (not that anyone will be checking)

    Not true. A student ID is only valid if the school has presented a student housing list to election officials. And a utility bill only comes into play if you can also present one of the following:

    * Minnesota Driver’s License
    * Minnesota ID Card
    * United States Passport
    * United States Military ID Card
    * Tribal ID Card
    * Minnesota University, College, or Technical College ID Card

    Presumably this is for MN residents who HAVE VALID ID, but have recently moved to a new address.

  36. #734630
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:38 pm, chapoutier said:

    Correction to above. The ID may be expired, but point being that you can’t just hand over a utility bill and stroll over to the voting booth.

  37. #734638
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:43 pm, Socky said:

    Yeah, chap like anyone is going to go back and check after the election. You know damn well they won’t. And most any form of ID on the list will be quite easy to fake.

    You also conveniently leave two other forms of “ID” off your list.

    - A voter registered in the same precinct as you who can confirm your address with a signed oath
    - An employee of the residential facility where you live who can confirm your address with a signed oath

    I am sure your helpful local ACORN worker will be happy to provide such a signed oath.

  38. #734642
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:45 pm, Socky said:

    BTW, the Bureau of the Census has given the city of Detroit 81,000 imaginary residents. That’s 81,000 imaginary voters for ACORN to bring to the next election.

  39. #734672
    On July 1st, 2009 at 1:59 pm, Major O said:

    And speaking of ACORN…

    What the devil is ACORN doing being involved seemingly EVERYWHERE on our tax dollars????

    I’m so utterly SICK and TIRED of this left wing front group parading around being involved in any old thing they please with zero repercussions in terms of their funding or status. All the while they are over and over found committing fraud.

    Let someone on the Left defend this ridiculous piece of garbage organization if they will.

  40. #734701
    On July 1st, 2009 at 2:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    Socky,

    You claimed that same day voting entailed simply having a utility bill or a student ID, both of which were demonstrably false, if you had taken five seconds, as I did to actually look at the requirements.

    I made no other argument as to any other provisions of MN’s same day registration requirements. Don’t pretend I did, and then attack the false argument ascribed to me (strawman) to draw attention away from your own incorrect assumptions.

  41. #734736
    On July 1st, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Socky said:

    My assertion was that Minnesota makes it easy to commit voter fraud by allowing same day voting registration with non-verifiable ID. This assertion is completely accurate.

  42. #734744
    On July 1st, 2009 at 2:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    My assertion was that Minnesota makes it easy to commit voter fraud by allowing same day voting registration with non-verifiable ID. This assertion is completely accurate.

    Your words exactly follow:

    All you need is a school ID or even a utility bill or rental receipt, which are easy to fake (not that anyone will be checking).

    Usually people back up their assertions with factual examples. But hey, I guess making crap up out of thin air is fine, so long as you believe in the message.

  43. #735160
    On July 2nd, 2009 at 2:09 am, tbear44 said:

    chappy sez:

    Usually people back up their assertions with factual examples. But hey, I guess making crap up out of thin air is fine, so long as you believe in the message.

    Yes, any Obamabot will tell you that is true.

  44. #735166
    On July 2nd, 2009 at 2:46 am, love2rumba said:

    I’m so sick of these RINOs playing gentlemen, at our expense. RE John McCain’s entire presidential campaign.

    My sentiment exactly.

  45. #735168
    On July 2nd, 2009 at 2:50 am, love2rumba said:

    Minnesota has a system of “same day registration,” where you can show up, register, and vote on the spot. All you need is a school ID or even a utility bill or rental receipt, which are easy to fake (not that anyone will be checking). It’s a system ripe for abuse. It’s only too easy for out-of-state college students or a couple busloads of ACORN voters from Chicago to be parachuted into marginal precincts to up the vote for the Demonrats.

    They wouldn’t allow us to get our passport that way and just hop on a plane the same day, why should voter registration be any different?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Al Franken, rejected

March 6, 2009 03:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

How Al Franken celebrates history

January 19, 2009 10:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A CONTRIBUTION TODAY!”

A real clown takes a Senate seat

January 5, 2009 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

209 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

Laughingstock.

Sunday morning round-up

January 4, 2009 07:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

61 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

I see “Lizard People”

November 21, 2008 10:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

The Franken-Coleman recount

November 18, 2008 04:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Hanging by a thread in Minnesota

November 10, 2008 03:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

108 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Franken-fright.

Franken-Coleman Watch: Coleman pulling ahead

November 4, 2008 10:38 PM by Michelle Malkin

74 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Crikey.


Categories: Al Franken



TigerHawk

» Negative equity
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook