Americans shifting to the right (Snowe and Collins not listening)

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 6, 2009 01:26 PM

Nearly 4 in 10 Americans say their views are growing more conservative, according to a new Gallup poll:

Despite the results of the 2008 presidential election, Americans, by a 2-to-1 margin, say their political views in recent years have become more conservative rather than more liberal, 39% to 18%, with 42% saying they have not changed. While independents and Democrats most often say their views haven’t changed, more members of all three major partisan groups indicate that their views have shifted to the right rather than to the left.

(Hat tip – Just Karl)

Are Republican senators paying attention? Apparently not.

Nutroots King Kos is gloating about the voting records of GOP Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. According to CQ Politics roll call vote analysis of 2009 patterns:

Both Snowe and Collins voted 92 percent of the time with Obama and less than 50 percent of the time with their own party.

Who needs Al Franken with Republicans like these?

Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Americans are 2 to 1 more conservative than liberal according to latest Gallup poll | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  2. Joe Biden vs. John Hancock and Theodore Roosevelt on True American Patriotism « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  3. GayPatriot » Despite 2008 Election, Americans Still Moving Right
  4. Peace through strength: a Reagan lesson for Barack Obama « Jim Blazsik
  5. Mark Levin: What Is Conservatism? « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  6. One Voice of the “Silent Majority” Speaks Out Against Our Government | Glenn Beck Show: The Letter « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  7. Majority of Americans Demand ‘Cancel the Porkulus Package Now’ « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  8. More Grist for the Mill « The Recreant Right
  9. Americans shifting to the right (Snowe and Collins not listening) | www.virginiaright.com
  10. 10 Worst States For Personal Freedom « Goodtimepolitics
  11. Media Ignores Obama’s Falling Polls « Goodtimepolitics
  12. Great Work Obama! More and More Americans Becoming Conservatives « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  13. Battleground Ohio – July 7, 2009 « NEOAVATARA
  14. U.S. Citizens Moving Toward Conservatism? : Conservative Zone
  15. ‘Liberal Democrats Control Everything, No Debate’… New NRSC Ad ‘60′ for 2010 Election (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  16. Beatles ‘I’ll Tax the Heat, I’ll Tax Your Feet’: Britain’s a Mess with Its Punishing Taxes, We’re Not Far Behind « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  17. Soft Tyranny: Mark Levin Interview on Sean Hannity’s Show (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  18. Quote of the Day… “America’s Greatness” from Sen. Jim DeMint « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  19. ‘Fat-Cat City’ with Bloated, Complicated ObamaCare Bureaucracy: Check Out the Scary-Huge Organizational Chart of House Democrats’ Single-Payer Health Plan « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  20. Rush Limbaugh Explains, Again, His “I Want Obama’s Agenda to Fail” Comments, Sean Hannity Show « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  21. Minus 10: Approval Index for Obama Still in the Dumper & Still Double Digits « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  22. Canadian-Style Health Care: Shona Holmes and Her Brain Tumor (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  23. Blue Dog DEMs Bite Obama – Slow The Hell Down!; Time is Against Obama who wants to jam Socialist Takeover down America’s throat « VotingFemale Speaks!
  24. Ugly Truths: Nude Photos of Obama’s Mama and Questions about Obama’s Past « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #738042
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:28 pm, corkie said:

    B

    oth Snowe and Collins voted 92 percent of the time with Obama…

    They both voted Present, too?

  2. #738044
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:29 pm, walterc said:

    When are these two going to follow Specter and make it official? There’s no point in counting them as Republicans if they are going to be solid Dem votes.

    Further proof of the need for term limits.

  3. #738050
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, ErinF said:

    I’ve been calling and calling their offices. They know my voice by now.

    I encourage people who blog here and at Hot Air to let their voices be heard. Just tell the phone rep at their offices you’re from Portland (zip: 04101)

    Snowe phone #s:
    (202) 224-5344 (DC office)
    (800) 432-1599 (ME only)

    Collins:
    (202) 224-2523 (DC office)
    (207) 780-3575 (Portland office)

    I’m getting on the phone again right now and calling both again. I should send them my freaking long distance phone bill.

  4. #738062
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, no2pcbs1 said:

    snowe and collins are too stupid to know they are actually democrats.

  5. #738064
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:43 pm, Tuesday said:

    Thanks for the info, Erin. I, and a group of friends will start calling both of them now.

    They should remember their campaign promises. I am sure they made some reference to their conservatism, then. If they are so liberal/progressive-minded (what misnomers – they bastardaized the words, unless the latter means progressively worse!), they should change their party affiliations like Arlen Specter.

  6. #738068
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, ErinF said:

    Thanks Tuesday. It only takes a few seconds to call, so get as many to do it as you can.

    I would love to take a shot at running against either of them. Just a pipe dream of mine…

  7. #738078
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Obviously that doesn’t mean Mainers are getting more conservative. Have you seen the Obama favorables by region? He is overwhelmingly popular in the Northeast, over 80%. Also over 65% in the midwest and west, leaving the south (surprise!) as the only region that does not approve of the our first black president.

  8. #738079
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    the voters who keep re-electing snowe and collins are too stupid to know they are actually democrats.

    There – fixed it.

  9. #738081
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Snowe and Collins vote em out in 2010.

    Sure would be good to know who will run against them now so we can form our opinions, possibly support.
    hint to the pipedreamer #6…

  10. #738082
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, Regulus said:

    Both Snowe and Collins voted 92 percent of the time with Obama and less than 50 percent of the time with their own party.

    Who needs Al Franken with Republicans like these?

    That’s been the Republicans’ hobgoblin for some time now.

    In 2004, when we gained a 55-45 majority in the Senate yet still acted like we were in the minority (e.g., “We’d like to reform Social Security, but the donks might call us names!”), I came to realize that to really enact a conservative agenda would require at least a 65-35 and more likely a 70-30 Republican majority in that body, taking into account the number of squishes who could be reliably counted on to find their way into the donks’ camp.

    The Republicans are gradually weeding out the squishes, but the problem is that they’re being replaced with donks: either Genuine Donks over Republican cross-dressers, or with Stealth (i.e., “Blue Dog”) Donks who while campaigning for office pretend to be to the right of Republicans then march in lock-step with Hope-a-Dope after they’ve won.

    The only way out of the wilderness in for the Republicans in the short term is for Donk Fever to run its course in this country — if it doesn’t kill us all first. Sadly, I’m not at all optimistic about that prognosis.

  11. #738083
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Here’s something from Snowe’s web page. If you’re having lunch, you may want to finish it now.

    All of her stationary should have RINO imprinted in it as a watermark.

    This pretty much tells you where her allegiance lies. And it’s not with the GOP.

    SNOWE PLEASED WITH OBAMA’S OPENNESS ON HEALTH CARE REFORM
    President reaches out in phone call to Senator Snowe this afternoon

    June 30, 2009

    Washington, D.C. -

    As a key member of the powerful Senate Finance Committee working to forge historic legislation to provide access to high-quality, affordable health care for all Americans, U.S. Senator Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) received a call this afternoon from President Obama seeking her input on health reform.? The President expressed his desire to work with Snowe – a member of the “Coalition of the Willing”, a bipartisan group of senior members of the Finance Committee that routinely meet to find common ground — to produce a bipartisan bill to address his top legislative goal:

    “Today, President Obama reiterated to me that reforming the nation’s health care system is his highest priority, and that he continues to be open to suggestions and ideas as the Finance Committee crafts this vital legislation.? As health reform would affect all Americans, I appreciate his understanding of the critical importance of producing a bipartisan bill with the broadest possible support, and his willingness to work together to achieve this watershed endeavor.? The President repeated his goal of passing legislation in the full Senate prior to the August break that would be deficit-neutral while providing universal coverage — and I reaffirmed to the President my commitment to ensuring the Finance Committee creates the best possible package to guarantee health security for all Americans.”

  12. #738086
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, olsantaroy said:

    Are Snowe and Collins not considered Models for Moderate Republicans? Please somebody convince them to quit pretending they are not LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE/LEFTIST democrats. Moderate Republicans are to blame for Pelosi and Reid being in charge of Congress since 2006.

    Meg Whitman for CA gov, then President- Rah!

  13. #738088
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, tre said:

    Hopefully, John Cornyn is hearing this, too.

  14. #738089
    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, chapoutier said:

    Snowe and Collins vote em out in 2010.

    I think that will be really difficult. They both have wide support in the state. Snowe is one of the most popular Senators in the country.

    Also, Snowe isn’t up for reelection until 2012 and Collins in 2014.

    So uphill battle for you.

  15. #738090
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    The only way out of the wilderness in for the Republicans in the short term is for Donk Fever to run its course in this country — if it doesn’t kill us all first.

    I’m all for an injection of Palin-cillin!

  16. #738091
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Socky said:

    Ah, Count on Rest Stop Septic tank to be the first to shout “Racism.”

  17. #738093
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, no2pcbs1 said:

    snowe at one time was working off of two brain cells, guess the dominant one died and the subservient one has taken over what passes for a body.

  18. #738097
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, purplepeep said:

    I like the opening line of the Gallup poll article:

    Despite the results of the 2008 presidential election

    Should read “Because of the results of 2008 presidential election”.

    The line also doesn’t take into consideration how hard Obama tried to portray himself as moderate, if not conservative. He was even invoking Reagan’s name.

    At any rate, “voter’s remorse” with the Democrats & Obama just keeps growing, as most of us espected it would.

  19. #738098
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Obviously that doesn’t mean Mainers are getting more conservative. Have you seen the Obama favorables by region? He is overwhelmingly popular in the Northeast, over 80%. Also over 65% in the midwest and west, leaving the south (surprise!) as the only region that does not approve of the our first black president.

    Those numbers fly in the face of recent polls I have seen. Would you like to provide us with credible links or details to support your numbers?

  20. #738100
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:06 pm, right_on said:

    So, Olympia is living up to her “lofty” name? Perhaps, with Herculean effort, she can be deposed?

    Maybe with continued heat from the national conservative Republicans, this Snowe job will melt…

    Sorry. :evil:

  21. #738102
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:07 pm, ErinF said:

    the voters who keep re-electing snowe and collins are too stupid to know they are actually democrats.

    I agree wholeheartedly. The majority of voters up here are living on welfare. So when you do the math, it’s job security for my two twit senators. Makes it hard for someone like myself who is trying to run a business on my own.

    Maine is the highest taxed state in the nation. We are also the state with the lowest per capita income.

    It’s aggrevating. My husband and I have started considering moving to Alaska.

  22. #738113
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, purplepeep said:

    Last Massachusetts Conservative said:
    Those numbers fly in the face of recent polls I have seen. Would you like to provide us with credible links or details to support your numbers?

    Even if were so, it would only demonstrate how slow some people are to realizing and admitting they are wrong. It would show that folks in the south are less likely to get suckered by a politician. Quite a compliment.

    And it would also prove Republican President Abraham Lincoln was right, since some out-of-touch east coast moonbats can be “fooled all the time”.

  23. #738114
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, Major O said:

    There are plenty of numbers of black people who either are growing disillusioned with the “one” (I think of black conservative Christians), or who, like me, never bought into his nonsense in the first place.

    Now, since the election, most of my extended family are decidedly against Obama’s policies and a couple think the man himself is despicable.

    You don’t have to be white and from “the south” to think the first (half) black president is a disaster for this country. Nice little cheap (and snide) shot, though.

  24. #738115
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, no2pcbs1 said:

    zero is an affirmative action facade, and the sheep (snowe and collins included)see race as an issue so will fight to keep him from failing. zero is liberalism’s ultimate scam and the stakes are high so the lies and deception will continue.

  25. #738116
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, chapoutier said:

    Maine is the highest taxed state in the nation. We are also the state with the lowest per capita income.

    According to the US Census bureau, Maine is 35th in pci. Not great, but hardly the worst (which are for the most part all in the south).

    And I have not found any site where Maine’s tax burden is the highest. For sales, property, excise taxes, it seems to fall to the middle-high end. With one notable exception, it seems, for business tax burden, in which Maine is 49 out of 51 (DC included).

  26. #738120
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    does not approve of the our first black Marxist president.

  27. #738121
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, Paul Revere said:

    leaving the south (surprise!) as the only region that does not approve of the our first mostly White black president.

    Always capitalize “South”, little boy.

  28. #738128
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, love2rumba said:

    Obviously that doesn’t mean Mainers are getting more conservative. Have you seen the Obama favorables by region? He is overwhelmingly popular in the Northeast, over 80%. Also over 65% in the midwest and west, leaving the south (surprise!) as the only region that does not approve of the our first black president.

    Obama will be popular in the Northeast until the money runs out, then watch out.

  29. #738129
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    purplepeep, I would agree that some (I would speculate most) are slow to admit they were wrong.

    I just wanted RSS to substantiate his premise. The numbers he states seem to have come from lgm’s “math for liberals” class.

  30. #738136
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, purplepeep said:

    Major O said:
    You don’t have to be white and from “the south” to think the first (half) black president is a disaster for this country. Nice little cheap (and snide) shot, though.

    It would have been nice if the first president with some black blood in his/her veins had been competent, experienced and trustworthy. If Obama was supposed to have “advanced black interests” somehow, he instead more likely will have set such interests back a 100 years by the time he’s done. That’s the real shame.

  31. #738137
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, jsr said:

    leaving the south (surprise!) as the only region that does not approve of the our first black president.

    I doubt the validity of those numbers but no matter. I’m confident plenty of those unemployed union workers in the Northeast and Midwest will start coming around, especially when they start seeing their heating bills double if Cap and Tax gets through the Senate. Just like there were a class of voters called Reagan Democrats, there will soon be another one called Obama former Democrats. At which point Dems will insinuate that racism is at the heart of their opposition.

  32. #738140
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, tre said:

    “math for liberals”

    1+1=5 1/3. If you disagree then you must be a racistnazifacisthomophobe.

  33. #738143
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Those numbers fly in the face of recent polls I have seen. Would you like to provide us with credible links or details to support your numbers?

    Here are the numbers from daily kos, who were dead on for the election.

  34. #738144
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I said it once, I’ll say it again.

    Snowe and Collins are Democrat moles in the GOP caucus.

    If anyone had nads, they’d hold a caucus meeting and vote them out. Losing them to the Dem caucus is no loss, they vote with them anyway.

    Anybody remember Lincoln Chaffee, who inherited his father’s Senate seat. When he was defeated in 2006, he admitted he was a Democrat, and said he didn’t switch to the Marxist caucus because the GOP had the majority then and he could “influence” (read: sabotage) Republican policy more from their caucus.

    I’ll send money to individual Republicans running for the Senate, but as long as the two Maine moles aren’t booted, and the RNSCC picks the RINO over the conservative a year ahead of the primary, not a freaking penny.

  35. #738148
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, chapoutier said:

    Latest demographic breakdown from gallup of job pproval. Not quite the same as favorable/unfvorable but close enough.

  36. #738149
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, purplepeep said:

    Last Massachusetts Conservative said:
    purplepeep, I would agree that some (I would speculate most) are slow to admit they were wrong.

    I just wanted RSS to substantiate his premise. The numbers he states seem to have come from lgm’s “math for liberals” class.

    LOL. I was just having some fun with imaginary numbers. Even Algore could come up with his own special variety of “fuzzy” ones. On the other hand, he did invent the internet, making it possible for you and I to have our fun here. So I guess it all balances out. :)

  37. #738152
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:40 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Here are the numbers from daily kos …

    RSS, you obviously missed the qualifier “credible” in my question to you!

  38. #738155
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, chapoutier said:

    RSS, you obviously missed the qualifier “credible” in my question to you!

    It’s not Kos. It’s Research 2000, a legit polling firm that was one of the better pollsters (in terms of hitting the right numbers) in the last election cycle.

  39. #738156
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Are Snowe and Collins not considered Models for Moderate Republicans?

    No, McCain and Graham and Voino are “moderate Republicans”. A lot of wrong votes on crucial issues, but have something like center-right principles, and vote with the caucus more often than they vote against it.

    AKA, they are squishes. One should, IMHO, oppose them hard in any primary, but they are almost certainly better than their Demonratic/Marxist opponent.
    Coleman was a squish, but if the GOP picks up a couple more Senate seats in 2010 (possible, even defending more seats), considering the hardcore RINOs, Coleman may have made the difference on cloture votes between 59 and 60. The third party candidate sucked off just enough votes to make Coleman’s election day win close enough for the ACORN fraudsters and Demonratic party lawyers to steal.

    Collins and Snowe are Democrats in the closet. Think of them as Super-Blue Dog Democrats.

    Oppose them in the primaries, then feel free to vote third party, or stay home, or even vote Democrat, because losing them, like losing Chafee, is no loss at all to America.

  40. #738163
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Who needs Al Franken with Republicans like these?

    The taxpaying voters of Minnesota.

  41. #738164
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, purplepeep said:

    Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    “Here are the numbers from daily kos …”

    RSS, you obviously missed the qualifier “credible” in my question to you!

    He’s holding out on that until the Pravda poll numbers are published.

    This is where tracking polls like Rasmussen’s come in handy – you see the daily trend charted from start to current, as you would look at the DJIA to get an idea of where things are headed.

  42. #738167
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, purplepeep said:

    chapoutier said:

    “RSS, you obviously missed the qualifier “credible” in my question to you!”

    It’s not Kos.

    Chappy, to believe that, you’d have to start with the premise that Kos wants to post polls that would detract from Obama. That’s just not realistic.

    Normally, the Kos Kidz love the usually Obama-friendly Gallup folks. I just checked and there’s zero mention of the Gallup poll that’s the subject of this post – Kos shoots the messengers.

  43. #738168
    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:58 pm, John Deaux said:

    I’m calling BS to RSS’s poll. Here the poll of polls showing that even CNN had Obama at 61, not 63.

  44. #738175
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:06 pm, chapoutier said:

    John,

    Job approval is not the same as favorable/unfavorable.

    Chappy, to believe that, you’d have to start with the premise that Kos wants to post polls that would detract from Obama. That’s just not realistic.

    Believe what? Research 2000, an independent pollster that did very well in the last cycle, is going to jeopardize the one commodity a pollster has, credibility, for the sake of one client? Don’t be daft. Their numbers may be on the high side toward Obama, but that does not mean they are invalid data points and is why real clear politics and pollster are useful for compiling ALL the data points.

  45. #738195
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:19 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Chap, RRS said “He is overwhelmingly popular in the Northeast, over 80%. Also over 65% in the midwest and west…”

    He did not say anything about favorability ratings.

  46. #738198
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:20 pm, John Deaux said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:06 pm, chapoutier said:
    John,

    Job approval is not the same as favorable/unfavorable.

    Okay, let’s look at that instead. Research 2000’s numbers seem a bit inflated.

  47. #738208
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Is this the same GOP that several resident Republican trolls keep saying we have to work with? The road to conservative success runs through the GOP? Sorry, I don’t see it. That road runs OVER the GOP. Go Sarah!!!

  48. #738211
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    Chap, RRS said “He is overwhelmingly popular in the Northeast, over 80%. Also over 65% in the midwest and west…”

    He did not say anything about favorability ratings.

    Okay. If you think that is an unacceptable synonym, then I guess you have a point…

  49. #738212
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, kjw33 said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Obviously that doesn’t mean Mainers are getting more conservative. Have you seen the Obama favorables by region? He is overwhelmingly popular in the Northeast, over 80%. Also over 65% in the midwest and west, leaving the south (surprise!) as the only region that does not approve of the our first black president.

    Those numbers fly in the face of recent polls I have seen. Would you like to provide us with credible links or details to support your numbers?

    yeah, it was a HuffPo poll of far-left libs. lol!

  50. #738217
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, John Deaux said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    Is this the same GOP that several resident Republican trolls keep saying we have to work with? The road to conservative success runs through the GOP? Sorry, I don’t see it. That road runs OVER the GOP. Go Sarah!!!

    If a squatter takes up residence in your barn, do you abandon it and say you’ll build a new barn?

    We have a perfectly good political party with all of the infrastructure in place. We just need to take it back. If the Kossacks can do it with the Democratic party, why can’t we do it with the GOP?

  51. #738220
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, kjw33 said:

    for the record, my post #49 (above) was made before I read RSS’s citation of the daily kos!!! ROTFLMAO!!!

  52. #738222
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, chapoutier said:

    Okay, let’s look at that instead. Research 2000’s numbers seem a bit inflated.

    But closer to the aggregate than Rassmussen.

    Look, all polling firms have a house bias that good pollster analysts try to account for. Research 2000 does as well as Gallup, Survey USA, Rassmussen and god help me, Zogby. You can dismiss the firm because you don’t like the numbers or you can look at the pollster’s track record.

  53. #738223
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, JusDreamin said:

    Here are the numbers from daily kos, who were dead on for the election.

    I needed a good laugh today… :)

  54. #738230
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, prendad said:

    Who needs Al Franken with Republicans like these?

    Actually, I thing that it is rather nice that Al Franken won the election and will represent the great state of Minnesota in our congress. After all, voters voted and they got what they wanted. I am sure that the voters are looking forward to all the wonderful things that an experienced man like Al Franken can bring to them. His great knowledge of legislative procedures, his endless list of close friends in the senate, and his cunning, well documented expertise at solving problems will all quickly bring Minnesota to the forefront of “great American States”.
    . . . . .
    BWWAAAAAAAHHHAAAAAAAAA BWWWWWAAAAAHHHAAAAAA HAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAA. . .
    Good luck Minnesota. You will need it.

  55. #738232
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:38 pm, WarTip said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, zyzzyg said:

    He’s holding out on that until the Pravda poll numbers are published.

    Ummmmmm, the New Pravda already said he was moving too far, too fast down the road to communism as did the Communist Chinese who are heavily invested in US Debt.

  56. #738233
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:39 pm, John Deaux said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, chapoutier said:

    But closer to the aggregate than Rassmussen.

    They skew the aggregate. If you’ll look at the data before the KOS/R2000 polls, you’ll see that Rasmussen mirrors the trend almost exactly.

  57. #738237
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, purplepeep said:

    chapoutier said:

    “Chappy, to believe that, you’d have to start with the premise that Kos wants to post polls that would detract from Obama. That’s just not realistic.”

    Believe what? Research 2000, an independent pollster that did very well in the last cycle, is going to jeopardize the one commodity a pollster has, credibility, for the sake of one client?

    A person would have to be incredibly naive not to take a skeptical view of “paid by” polls. I would say the same if you cited a poll bankrolled by the RNC. The bottom-line that keeps every company in business is “make the customer happy”. If they don’t come back with happy, shiny numbers the hired gun pollster loses the customer.

    Their numbers may be on the high side toward Obama

    The technical term is “outlier”(more accurately in this case, a “paid outlier”). It’s to create a buzz that is not reflected in reality, nothing more. Pump up the kidz with some faux “good news for a change” to combat all the bad news. Macht nichts.

    If you were looking at it from a dispassionate, cold angle you’d be wondering why the numbers are on the “high side”. We all prefer to believe that which would seem to confirm our beliefs, that’s just natural it’s-human type stuff.

    But if you remember Contract Law 101, you’ll recall that material fact counts, personal opinion doesn’t.

    In taking a step back you get the wider view. From everything I’ve seen poll-wise, including such things as “Is the country headed in the right/wrong direction” it doesn’t look that things are trending well for Obama and the Democrats. As I said you have to view things as you would the DJIA, over a period of time to get an idea of which way the wind is blowing and shifting.

    I think a real “teller” is what I mentioned in my previous comment. Kos never failed to tout Gallup numbers before. They favored Obama/Democrats, so that’s obvious. Now that is changing and there’s not a peep about this Gallup poll. I just checked again now – but perhaps we’ll see some rarionalization as to why Gallup is “bogus” and assertions that their paid-for outlier “high side” poll is right. Which is OK – it’s all part of the game and it’s certainly more fun than contemplating “but what if what everything else is telling us is true?”.

    Me, I know when somebody’s trying to blow sunshine up my drawers (esp. if I bankroll ‘em). School’s been out on that for some time now for me.

  58. #738238
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, beachmom said:

    We here in ME have written and called them over and over, ad nauseum and they don’t care. They send out their responses that are nothing but the usual psychobabble. Some of us have even asked them to make it official and change the R after their names to a D.

    Snowe has never held a position in the private or business sector. Her husband held the seat before her and when he passed away, she took over and never left.
    Collins promised to only serve 2 terms and is now on her 3rd.

  59. #738246
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    It’s no surprise that Obama is popular in the Northeast. It’s where Barney Frank, Jon Corzine, John Kerry and Ted Kennedy hail from. So don’t expect too much from voters in this neck of the woods.

    If you want to rate it regionally, break it down more than they did. You’ll find limited geographic areas where Obama is actually popular.

    Plus, give it time. His honeymoon is almost over. The press is actually calling him out on his claim that the stimulus package would cap unemployment at 8%. How inconvenient that it’s at 9.5% and climbing. Biden seems to be blaming Bush. No surprise there.

  60. #738248
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, chapoutier said:

    They skew the aggregate. If you’ll look at the data before the KOS/R2000 polls, you’ll see that Rasmussen mirrors the trend almost exactly.

    Excluding Research 2000, 3 off on the favorable and a whopping 8 off on the unfavorable is “almost exactly”?

  61. #738250
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    and there’s this…

    The only reason that the reported unemployment rate rose by only 0.1 percentage points (to 9.5%) in June was that many jobless people became discouraged and stopped looking for work.

    Great job O-Dopey.

  62. #738251
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:50 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Who needs Al Franken with Republicans like these?
    The government entitlement recipients leaching off the taxpaying voters of Minnesota.

    FIFY

  63. #738254
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, swede said:

    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:39 pm, John Deaux said:
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:30 pm,

    They skew the aggregate. If you’ll look at the data before the KOS/R2000 polls, you’ll see that Rasmussen mirrors the trend almost exactly.

    And as I recall, Rasmussen’s pre election numbers were almost dead on.

    chap, agreed all most or all pollsters have bias. And Gallup would certainly be in the leftward category. Which is why their finding a rightward lean is significant.

    Also prefer the RCP method of averaging polls, except that more polls seem to lean left. How is it that ABC and WaPo (your favorite rag!) are 8 points above the mean for Obama’s job approval? Polling at Columbia U’s student union perhaps.

  64. #738255
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Also, Snowe isn’t up for reelection until 2012 and Collins in 2014.

    Thanks and yep you’re right, Chap. I must be reading TeaPartyPatriots spreadsheet incorrectly – or….
    I’ll keep it and make corrections as I gain more info…

  65. #738258
    On July 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, purplepeep said:

    prendad said:
    Good luck Minnesota. You will need it.

    In the Carter mid-term election, which was nowhere near the disaster Obama is (and keeps trending to) both the sitting Democrat senators got booted, replaced by Republicans. It’s still referred to hereabouts as “The Minnesota Massacre”.

    I wouldn’t be overly surprised if history repeats itself.

  66. #738260
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:04 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    chapoutier said:

    They skew the aggregate. If you’ll look at the data before the KOS/R2000 polls, you’ll see that Rasmussen mirrors the trend almost exactly.

    Excluding Research 2000, 3 off on the favorable and a whopping 8 off on the unfavorable is “almost exactly”?

    Where is the demographic breakout and party affiliation breakout for respondents in that poll?

  67. #738261
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Nevermind. I found them.

  68. #738262
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, chapoutier said:

    Which one?

    Research 2000 or Rasmussen?

    You should be able to click on either poll to get to the source info.

    Ahhh…this is getting silly. I have no problem believing that both Obama’s job approval and/or favorables are going down and that more people going right than left. I think that it is the natural order of things to always think the grass is greener on the other side. Ultimately, people are rarely happy with politics no matter which party is in power.

  69. #738266
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:18 pm, swede said:

    It’s more than the demographic polled, it’s the questions asked. I stopped taking them because none of the multiple choice responses accurately reflected my opinion, and there were usually no “none of the above” options.

    Rate President Obama:

    A) He is the Messiah
    B) He is the AntiChrist

    OK, a little embellished, but not much.

  70. #738267
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Anybody note the growing number of “flat-forehead” moments out there…

    Buffet, the MicroSoft CEO…

    Now Collin Powell.

    Woooooops…

  71. #738273
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Swede, in the polling biz, there’s another factor. When a live person takes the poll, many respondents won’t answer honestly if they feel their answer will tag them as a racist. Whether that label is accurate or not. In the case of Obama, some people will say they like him to avoid saying “they don’t like the black guy”. There are a number of articles on this.

    As for the grass being greener Chap, I can’t think of a time when to the followers of a candidate, the grass could have looked any greener. As reality sets in, the swing to rejection may be pretty severe. So far, his stimulus bill is a failure. It’s only effect has been to drive up our debt. That’s starting to become more evident.

    And my point is that the super high he generated among his followers may just produce a catastrophic low in terms of his ratings. Much more so than the typical case in post Pres Election polls.

  72. #738276
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Ragspierre said:

    Anybody note the growing number of “flat-forehead” moments out there…

    Sorry Rags… I don’t follow.

  73. #738277
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    this?

    “Flat Forehead Syndrome.” It is the result of beating your head against the brick wall of:

    * “We’ve always done it this way!”
    * “If it ain’t broke, why fix it!”
    * “But my neighbor said his dad didn’t have to do this!”
    * “I’ve been doing it this way for X years and the IRS hasn’t said anything!”

  74. #738279
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, purplepeep said:

    chapoutier said:
    I have no problem believing that both Obama’s job approval and/or favorables are going down and that more people going right than left.

    May be, but you seem to have a difficult time accepting it, as evidenced by your attempt to “prove” otherwise in submitting a Soros-Kos paid poll. This even though you confessed it’s revealing odd “high sided” numbers.

    As I sez, if you had tossed out an RNC paid-for poll “proving” that the majority of Americans want the constitution changed so GWBush can come back for a 3rd term, I’d call BS on that too.

    “Ahhh…this is getting silly”

    Nope – as I said, it’s only human to look for any tiny ray of sunshine at midnight. That works if you’re close to the Artic Circle. And for the Democrats, the sun is just beginning to set. The numbers, for them, will get much worse, if you look at the trends.

  75. #738280
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Picture your reaction when you realize you did something really dumb.

    Hand comes forcefully to forehead in a slapping motion. Sufferer exclaims, “How could I have been SO stupid?!?!?” (or words to that effect).

    See? A “flat-forehead” moment.

    Often a malady associated with severe buyer’s remorse…or being chumped.

  76. #738284
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, chapoutier said:

    And my point is that the super high he generated among his followers may just produce a catastrophic low in terms of his ratings. Much more so than the typical case in post Pres Election polls.

    Perhaps, but this has yet to be seen. As it stands, he is predictably off his highest high, but he still has very good support, even from Rasmussen.

  77. #738285
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:35 pm, Socky said:

    There is a cultural element, too. A lot of people who live in Maine and Massachusetts are just plain nasty. Their political choices reflect that.

  78. #738288
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, purplepeep said:

    NJ-Aviator said:
    As for the grass being greener Chap, I can’t think of a time when to the followers of a candidate, the grass could have looked any greener.

    Very good point, NJ-A.

  79. #738293
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    chapoutier said:

    Perhaps, but this has yet to be seen. As it stands, he is predictably off his highest high, but he still has very good support, even from Rasmussen.

    All true. Only time will tell.

    The swing group, if there is one, are the independents. And they can be a fickle bunch.

  80. #738294
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, purplepeep said:

    chapoutier said:
    As it stands, he is predictably off his highest high, but he still has very good support, even from Rasmussen.

    That’s an optimistic “the water’s only 4 inches deep now” observation if I ever heard one, Chappy.

  81. #738295
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Ragspierre said:

    Picture your reaction when you realize you did something really dumb.

    Got it.

    LOL

  82. #738298
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, chapoutier said:

    May be, but you seem to have a difficult time accepting it, as evidenced by your attempt to “prove” otherwise in submitting a Soros-Kos paid poll. This even though you confessed it’s revealing odd “high sided” numbers.

    No. I was merely defending one particular pollster, which has a very good track record and is on one side of the spectrum. Being on the high end in and of itself means nothing, and certainly doesn’t mean it is an outlier. Otherwise we should properly dismiss Rassmussen from the conversation as well for being on the extreme low end. But I don’t because I take their polls as a legitimate data point as well. The only poll I would truly dismiss out of hand is Zogby, because he is simply awful.

    As I sez, if you had tossed out an RNC paid-for poll “proving” that the majority of Americans want the constitution changed so GWBush can come back for a 3rd term, I’d call BS on that too.

    So did you out of hand dismiss every Wall Street Journal/NBC Poll or every Fox News/ Opinions Dynamic Poll taked during the election? The fact is that the vast majority of polls are paid for by someone else, otherwise pollsters wouldn’t make much money, would they? To dismiss a poll based purely on the fact that it wasn’t performed for free is absurd.

  83. #738305
    On July 6th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, swede said:

    chapoutier said:
    he still has very good support, even from Rasmussen.

    Well, if 53% is very good, OK. And don’t even evoke the W comparison. I would call 70% or I guess even 65% very good. He is now nearly in the netral zone.

    Also interesting that when your position is becoming untenable, the discussion is getting “silly.” Kind of like Dear Leader’s “silly season” response to criticism.

  84. #738315
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    I’m really enjoying skimming through these comments, especially in light of the fact that during the election, EVERY conservative couldn’t stop talking about how polls were meaningless, that Sarah and Joe The Plumber would carry the day no matter what Gallup said.

    If you don’t like the results, the poll isn’t valid. That’s the coocoo bananas world of the right.

  85. #738316
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, chapoutier said:

    Well, if 53% is very good, OK. And don’t even evoke the W comparison. I would call 70% or I guess even 65% very good. He is now nearly in the netral zone.

    I guarantee that most presidents would be fine with a +9 approval in their worst poll. Your 65-70 standard is silly and untenable.

    Also interesting that when your position is becoming untenable, the discussion is getting “silly.”

    No. What was getting silly is I was going to spend time looking up detailed crosstabs. Better. Things. To. Do.

  86. #738338
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:10 pm, chapoutier said:

    I’m really enjoying skimming through these comments, especially in light of the fact that during the election, EVERY conservative couldn’t stop talking about how polls were meaningless, that Sarah and Joe The Plumber would carry the day no matter what Gallup said.

    I don’t know about that, but I do recall RedPill claiming that the ONLY poll he would trust was an AOL (as in for AOL members only, so you can imagine how that demographic would shake out) online straw poll that showed Obama losing every state but one (including NY, CA and Illinois for petes sake).

  87. #738341
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, GraniteMan said:

    Are Republican senators paying attention? Apparently not.

    As it has lamented here many times before in this space by many people conservatism has no voice. No one dare speak against the one! However watch our girl Sarah. Is she a voice from the wilderness that will lead us? We have no voice and she drove all the libs nuts last fall when she went after Obama. She can become the voice we need.

  88. #738342
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, purplepeep said:

    chapoutier said:
    So did you out of hand dismiss every Wall Street Journal/NBC Poll or every Fox News/ Opinions Dynamic Poll taked during the election?

    Actually, yes I did, as I still do, I didn’t then put much stock in any bought&paid-for polls. Especially in cases where the buyer is a PAC, ala Kos (or as I said any GOP PAC poll). It’s just common sense, Chap. You don’t really believe Kos or any other PAC is going to offer up polls saying “our side sucks”, do you?

    Mebbe I’ve just been around the political block a few more times than you. Not a chronological put-down of you just fessin’ up that I’m one skeptic curmudgeon, having seen more than my share of BS tossd out by political interests.

    To dismiss a poll based purely on the fact that it wasn’t performed for free is absurd.

    That’s not what I said, Chappy. “For free”? – hopefully that’s gotta be your liberal (”free lunch”) mind speaking, not your legal mind.

    But if you are really sure you want to stick by the your assertion that “follow the money” variety criticism of polling is “absurd”, I can run polls paid for by tabacco companies up the flagpole and watch you salute ‘em.

    In fact, I could toss out a whole variety of all sortsa bought&paid for polling data for you to praise.

    Now, are you truly sure considering “who funded what” is irrelevant (if not “absurd”)?

  89. #738345
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, purplepeep said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    If you don’t like the results, the poll isn’t valid. That’s the coocoo bananas world of the right.

    So, young man, is the Gallup poll that’s the topic of this post valid? – in your special “world”, I mean.

  90. #738353
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:21 pm, swede said:

    I’m really enjoying skimming through these comments, especially in light of the fact that during the election, EVERY conservative couldn’t stop talking about how polls were meaningless, that Sarah and Joe The Plumber would carry the day no matter what Gallup said.

    EVERY conservative? Hmmm. Don’t recall that. Most conservatives I discussed with or read were expecting a loss. Only question was by how much, and again Rasmussen hit it almost dead on.

    Polls are useful in giving some people jobs, and others something to talk about, I guess. Predicting human behavior has obvious limits.

  91. #738354
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    That’s not what I said, Chappy. “For free”? – hopefully that’s gotta be your liberal (”free lunch”) mind speaking, not your legal mind.

    So not free, but not paid for by any entity that would have an interest in actually paying for one. Gotcha. If you want to make this into a Kos v. Fox News thing, then lets just drop it. I am not going to change your mind about how super evil Kos is nor you me about how super fair and balanced Fox is.

    Now, are you truly sure considering “who funded what” is irrelevant (if not “absurd”)?

    Nope. I am saying it is wrong to dismiss a poll out of hand because someone actually paid to have it taken. You can and should factor possible bias into your analysis, sure, but you have shown zero interest in actually looking at the pollster and the poll and making any sort of objective analysis.

  92. #738362
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:29 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Guys, guys….

    There are PLENTY of metrics out there the point in the same trending direction.

    Anybody here doubt that things are starting to favor OPERATION OVER-REACH?

    Really. ANYBODY?

  93. #738372
    On July 6th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, swede said:

    rags, repeat after me. Dear Leader is all wise, all knowing and omnipotent. We are the collective. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

    We are the world. Or something.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook