See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Indefinite Detention: Obama’s Problem with Gitmo Terrorists « Frugal Café Blog Zone
2. “Paradiso Guantánamo” and Beauty Queens… Much More Than Meets the Eye « Frugal Café Blog Zone
3. Michelle Malkin » Sign the petition: Keep Gitmo detainees out

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #741043
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, FloridaBill said:

   UNBELIEVABLE

2. #741044
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, rainbow said:

   Everyday sh_ _ hits the fan! What next? This administration is a joke! MM I preordered your book and planning to send it to BHO for his birthday signed by several of my friends! Think he will get the message how dissatisfied we are?

3. #741046
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, Flyoverman said:

   If catch and release works for illegal aliens, well why not use it for captured terrorists?

   Everything Democrats do is viewed through a political prism. Serving the public interest no longer even registers in their conscious thought.

4. #741050
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, tre said:

   The Obama administration paid $200 million to the government of Palau in exchange for 17 Chinese Uighurs – members of a terrorist group affiliated with al-Qaeda – held at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

   Duh One REALLY needs to hire Sherrif Joe Arpaio to run his prison camps. He can do it for a fraction of that amount, and they’d run better.
   Screw the American Communist Lawyers Union!

5. #741051
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, MtsEdge said:

   Everything Democrats do is viewed through a political prism.

   Heh. Made me wonder, just for a fleeting moment, whether ex-Gitmo detainees may wind up on ACORN’s voter rolls? Just sayin’…

6. #741053
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, happyscrapper said:

   They have the majority…there is no stopping them, and they know it. The only glimmer of hope we have is that they are seriously overplaying their corruption, big time!! I still say, they will all go down. It will just take time and a lot of noise on our part!! But mark my words. They will pay for their treason.

7. #741056
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, hawkeye54 said:

   Serving the public interest no longer even registers in their conscious thought

   Nope. Serving their own interests above all. And I’m also positive that they are no longer capable of conscious thought.

8. #741057
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, TheWriteJerry said:

   Who do I have to terrorize to get a free vacation in Bermuda?

9. #741060
   On July 9th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, hawkeye54 said:

   Made me wonder, just for a fleeting moment, whether ex-Gitmo detainees may wind up on ACORN’s voter rolls

   I’m pretty sure their ACLU attorneys already provided them with univeral absentee ballots, acceptable for voting Democrat in any future election.

10. #741066
    On July 9th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, sonofdy said:

    Who do I have to terrorize to get a free vacation beach side house in Bermuda?

    Its not a vacation, its thier house.

11. #741071
    On July 9th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, Ragspierre said:

    THE ONE…with his Big BRO Demoncrat stooges…, has moved LOWER the costs of terrorism against the US.

    What would you expect will happen next…?

    THE ONE…with his Big BRO Demoncrat stooges…, has moved LOWER the confidence or our intelligence community.

    What would you expect will happen next…?

    How many dead Americans will this phase of OPERATION OVER-REACH cost us?

12. #741102
    On July 9th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, WarTip said:

    On July 9th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Everything Democrats do is viewed through a political prism.

    Heh. Made me wonder, just for a fleeting moment, whether ex-Gitmo detainees may wind up on ACORN’s voter Volunteer Community Activists and Brownshirt roles? Just sayin’…

13. #741125
    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Salt said:

    … to stop payment of any U.S. tax dollars to foreign nations who house these dangerous suspected terrorists.

    And here I thought they were against outsourcing American jobs.

14. #741127
    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:15 pm, cheapseat said:

    nothing bothers dems EXCEPT not being able to spend opm. kennedy spokesman says under the healthcare bill we will be spending money on bike trails and jungle gyms. errraahh it’s for the children.

15. #741131
    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:16 pm, WarTip said:

    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Salt said:

    … to stop payment of any U.S. tax dollars to foreign nations who house these dangerous suspected terrorists.

    And here I thought they were against outsourcing American jobs.

    Nope! The goal seems to be outsourcing all of the high-paying Union Jobs or destroying their industries altogether … even including some government jobs as with DMV and the IRS debacles of late. Go figure huh?

16. #741135
    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On July 9th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, hawkeye54 said:
    Made me wonder, just for a fleeting moment, whether ex-Gitmo detainees may wind up on ACORN’s voter rolls
    I’m pretty sure their ACLU attorneys already provided them with univeral absentee ballots, acceptable for voting Democrat in any future election.

    Along w/student visas, passports, and a few bucks spend money??

    whether ex-Gitmo detainees may wind up on ACORN’s Volunteer Community Activists and Brownshirt roles?

    Well, they’ve already been trained for the role…

17. #741191
    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, J S Ragman said:

    lgm mode on

    So what’s the big deal? I think $200 million is a small price to pay to erase the national shame brought on this country by the Bush administration’s illegal Gulags.

    lgm mode off

18. #741196
    On July 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, rightisright said:

    On July 9th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, TheWriteJerry said:

    Who do I have to terrorize to get a free vacation in Bermuda?

    To my understanding that’s life time vacation, those terrorists aren’t going anywhere at our expense.

19. #741217
    On July 9th, 2009 at 3:17 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    The Obama administration US taxpayers paid $200 million to the government of Palau in exchange for 17 Chinese Uighurs – members of a terrorist group affiliated with al-Qaeda – held at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

    Fixed it as a reminder that the Obama administration couldn’t pay for a cup of coffee without the US taxpayers. The government, regardless of which party is in charge, pays for nothing.

20. #741222
    On July 9th, 2009 at 3:19 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The Obama administration paid $200 million to the government of Palau in exchange for 17 Chinese Uighurs

    For $200 million they can come live at my house – but I predict a series of unfortunate accidents.

21. #741227
    On July 9th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, MtsEdge said:

    but I predict a series of unfortunate accidents.

    involving kool-aid???

22. #741247
    On July 9th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, love2rumba said:

    Heh. Made me wonder, just for a fleeting moment, whether ex-Gitmo detainees may wind up on ACORN’s voter rolls? Just sayin’…

    It would not surprise me…I recall the dems attempting to get felons on the voter rolls in Florida and Washington State-that’s how ended up with the current governor of Washington State.

23. #741252
    On July 9th, 2009 at 3:50 pm, MtsEdge said:

    that’s how ended up with the current governor of Washington State.

    Didn’t that gov thing in WA state also involve a recount where the losing Dem side kept “finding” votes a la MN Senate race…as a wise person has already pointed out, it’s not the voters that determine elections, it’s the vote counters…

24. #741259
    On July 9th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, Papa Louie said:

    In a statement, Mr Brown said the men have “the opportunity to become naturalised citizens and thereafter afforded the right to travel and leave Bermuda, potentially settling elsewhere.”
    -Times Online; June 11, 2009

    In other words, we just paid $200 million to send these Uighers on a meager vacation. For that price I would assume that tips are included. Lets hope they were telling the truth when they said that China’s worse than Gitmo. Then, perhaps, they won’t be holding a grudge against America when they’re voted off the island.

25. #741262
    On July 9th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, docflash said:

    Where is lgm on this.He loves these prisoners that BusHitlerChaneyHalliburton abused so terribly for all those years.Selling people out to the lowbidder sounds like slavery to me.

26. #741299
    On July 9th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Along w/student visas, passports, and a few bucks spend money??

    hah! More like their very own State Deparrtment issued preapproved American Express Card (no monthly limits!), and an engraved certificate of apology, each personally signed by DEAR LEADER – suitable for framing in a prominent location within their new US Government paid for living quarters.

27. #741306
    On July 9th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, docflash said:

    Blunt said. “Instead, they’re sending the suspected terrorists held at Guantanamo to the lowest bidder”.

    Sounds like slavery to me.

28. #741338
    On July 9th, 2009 at 6:41 pm, WarTip said:

    On July 9th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, docflash said:

    Blunt said. “Instead, they’re sending the suspected terrorists held at Guantanamo to the lowest bidder”.

    Sounds like slavery to me.

    Right concept wrong crowd. Those people will be given their freedoms and the ability to enjoy them. We the people will be given the bill, expected to pay for that and everything else and toil for whatever crumbs the gubmint is willing to allow us to keep.

    They are free, we are the slaves.

29. #741513
    On July 9th, 2009 at 11:38 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Section 3 of the 14th Amendment:

    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

30. #742339
    On July 10th, 2009 at 5:44 pm, blues said:

    I’ve got an idea.Why don’t we pay Al-Quida to take them. That’ll show’em what Obma’s real agenda is.