<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumbest pro-Sotomayor op-ed of the week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:30:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Racist Test for Judge Sonya Sotomayor and President Obama&#8211;Racism Unmasked!&#8211;Videos &#171; Pronk Palisades</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-745064</link>
		<dc:creator>The Racist Test for Judge Sonya Sotomayor and President Obama&#8211;Racism Unmasked!&#8211;Videos &#171; Pronk Palisades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-745064</guid>
		<description>[...] Wonder which Senator will be the first to bring up her “history-making” status as a Wise, History-Making Person Living With Diabetes? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wonder which Senator will be the first to bring up her “history-making” status as a Wise, History-Making Person Living With Diabetes? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday&#8217;s Funnies: Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Supreme Court Judge Nomination Political Cartoons &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-744600</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday&#8217;s Funnies: Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Supreme Court Judge Nomination Political Cartoons &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-744600</guid>
		<description>[...] rejected: SCOTUS reverses Sotomayor in firefighters case and Questions for Sonia Sotomayor and Dumbest pro-Sotomayor op-ed of the week Northern Thoughts And Reflections: It Just Keeps Coming; More on Sotomayor, and it isn’t good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejected: SCOTUS reverses Sotomayor in firefighters case and Questions for Sonia Sotomayor and Dumbest pro-Sotomayor op-ed of the week Northern Thoughts And Reflections: It Just Keeps Coming; More on Sotomayor, and it isn’t good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Day One: Spotlight on Sotomayor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-743515</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Day One: Spotlight on Sotomayor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-743515</guid>
		<description>[...] Wonder which Senator will be the first to bring up her &#8220;history-making&#8221; status as a Wise, History-Making Person Living With Diabetes? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wonder which Senator will be the first to bring up her &#8220;history-making&#8221; status as a Wise, History-Making Person Living With Diabetes? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor&#8217;s White Boyfriend (named &#8220;Mr. White,&#8221; you can&#8217;t make this stuff up) Dumped Her For a Younger Woman. I Think We Have Located the Origin of the &#8220;Wise Latinas Do It Better Than Stupid White Men&#8221; Remark. &#171; R</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742982</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor&#8217;s White Boyfriend (named &#8220;Mr. White,&#8221; you can&#8217;t make this stuff up) Dumped Her For a Younger Woman. I Think We Have Located the Origin of the &#8220;Wise Latinas Do It Better Than Stupid White Men&#8221; Remark. &#171; R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742982</guid>
		<description>[...] a subsequent nauseating and utterly unconvincing attempt at a hagiography of the personally unattractive Sotomayor, who is reputedly &#8220;kind of a bully&#8221; and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a subsequent nauseating and utterly unconvincing attempt at a hagiography of the personally unattractive Sotomayor, who is reputedly &#8220;kind of a bully&#8221; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor&#8217;s White Boyfriend (named &#8220;Mr. White,&#8221; you can&#8217;t make this stuff up) Dumped Her For a Younger Woman. I Think We Have Located the Origin of the &#8220;Wise Latinas Do It Better Than Stupid White Men&#8221; Remark. &#171; R</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742981</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor&#8217;s White Boyfriend (named &#8220;Mr. White,&#8221; you can&#8217;t make this stuff up) Dumped Her For a Younger Woman. I Think We Have Located the Origin of the &#8220;Wise Latinas Do It Better Than Stupid White Men&#8221; Remark. &#171; R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742981</guid>
		<description>[...] a subsequent nauseating and utterly unconvincing attempt at a hagiography of the personally unattractive Sotomayor, who is reputedly &#8220;kind of a bully&#8221; and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a subsequent nauseating and utterly unconvincing attempt at a hagiography of the personally unattractive Sotomayor, who is reputedly &#8220;kind of a bully&#8221; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742953</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742953</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care if she is a leper: she still tried to screw over those firemen in New Haven to keep a quota.

That is bad judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care if she is a leper: she still tried to screw over those firemen in New Haven to keep a quota.</p>
<p>That is bad judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742741</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742741</guid>
		<description>Hell I got gout and they haven&#039;t approched me. I guess I&#039;m not a shoe in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell I got gout and they haven&#8217;t approched me. I guess I&#8217;m not a shoe in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742678</link>
		<dc:creator>jangar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742678</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And as American Citizens, we will demand state of the art care which is insulin pump therapy.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You&#039;ll be lucky to get a 50ml bottle of novolog that isn&#039;t outdated, with a box of B-D syringes that don&#039;t last till the next box comes by mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And as American Citizens, we will demand state of the art care which is insulin pump therapy.
</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;ll be lucky to get a 50ml bottle of novolog that isn&#8217;t outdated, with a box of B-D syringes that don&#8217;t last till the next box comes by mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredofit08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742400</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredofit08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742400</guid>
		<description>from Steve Sailer&#039;s article on vdare.com...these are the questions that should be asked of Sotomayor:

&lt;blockquote&gt;But these questions would be worth asking for their own rhetorical sake:

    *

      Much as Chief Justice John Roberts asked during oral arguments over Ricci… Can you assure us, Judge Sotomayor, that your decision in Ricci for the City of New Haven would have been the same if minority firefighters scored highest on this test in disproportionate numbers, and the City said we don&#039;t like that result, we think there should be more whites on the fire department, and so we&#039;re going to throw the test out?
    *

      On the South Wall of the Supreme Court Building’s courtroom are carvings of the &quot;great lawgivers of history.&quot; The second earliest lawgiver depicted is Hammurabi, king of Babylon, who is honored for carving the laws in stone and putting them up in public—which meant that even the king couldn’t change the laws after the fact to suit his convenience. Why should Mayor DeStefano enjoy the privilege that King Hammurabi denied himself: to see what the final score turned out to be, then change the rules of the game?
    *

      In the Obama Administration’s friend of the court brief to the Supreme Court on the Ricci case, the Obama Administration called for your decision for summary judgment in favor of Mayor DeStefano to be overturned and the Ricci case to be remanded to local district court for retrial on the facts. Why did you vote for a more extremist outcome than the Obama Administration later called for?
    *

      Chief Justice Robert s recently wrote, &quot;[t]he way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.&quot; Do you agree?
    *

      Here’s a guest question from Emily Bazelon of Slate and the Yale Law School about your terse judgment in Ricci: &quot;The problem for Sotomayor, instead, is why she didn&#039;t grapple with the difficult constitutional issues, the ones Cabranes pointed to. Did she really have nothing to add to the district court opinion? In a case of this magnitude and intricacy, why would that be?&quot;
    *

      Is the primary point of our civil rights laws to protect minorities or to protect individuals of all races?
    *

      You have described yourself on video as &quot;a product of affirmative action&quot; and an &quot;affirmative action baby&quot; and that it is &quot;critical that we promote diversity.&quot; Considering your often-expressed passionate views on the topic and personal self-interest in promoting ethnic preferences, how could Frank Ricci have expected even-handed, colorblind justice from you?
    *

      Yes, but, according to the Supreme Court, Frank Ricci didn’t get justice from you, now did he?
    *

      I realize you resent these questions, but aren’t doubts about racial bias inevitably created by the act of treating people of different races differently, acts which you endorse?
    *

      Considering the personal benefits that ethnic preferences have provided you over the years, shouldn’t you have recused yourself from the Ricci case?
    *

      Will you promise to recuse yourself in all future cases involving quotas, affirmative action, discrimination, or disparate impact?
    *

      Six years ago, in the previous major affirmative action case, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her majority decision in Gratz, &quot;We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today. &quot; (That’s now only 19 years from 2009.) Do you agree?
    *

      Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in her dissenting opinion on Ricci: &quot;The Court&#039;s order and opinion, I anticipate, will not have staying power.&quot; Do you agree?
    *

      Should immigrants be eligible for racial and ethnic preferences?
    *

      Why?
    *

      Judge Sotomayor, you were a member of the National Council of La Raza from 1998 to 2004 . What do the words &quot;La Raza&quot; mean in English?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from Steve Sailer&#8217;s article on vdare.com&#8230;these are the questions that should be asked of Sotomayor:</p>
<blockquote><p>But these questions would be worth asking for their own rhetorical sake:</p>
<p>    *</p>
<p>      Much as Chief Justice John Roberts asked during oral arguments over Ricci… Can you assure us, Judge Sotomayor, that your decision in Ricci for the City of New Haven would have been the same if minority firefighters scored highest on this test in disproportionate numbers, and the City said we don&#8217;t like that result, we think there should be more whites on the fire department, and so we&#8217;re going to throw the test out?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      On the South Wall of the Supreme Court Building’s courtroom are carvings of the &#8220;great lawgivers of history.&#8221; The second earliest lawgiver depicted is Hammurabi, king of Babylon, who is honored for carving the laws in stone and putting them up in public—which meant that even the king couldn’t change the laws after the fact to suit his convenience. Why should Mayor DeStefano enjoy the privilege that King Hammurabi denied himself: to see what the final score turned out to be, then change the rules of the game?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      In the Obama Administration’s friend of the court brief to the Supreme Court on the Ricci case, the Obama Administration called for your decision for summary judgment in favor of Mayor DeStefano to be overturned and the Ricci case to be remanded to local district court for retrial on the facts. Why did you vote for a more extremist outcome than the Obama Administration later called for?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Chief Justice Robert s recently wrote, &#8220;[t]he way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.&#8221; Do you agree?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Here’s a guest question from Emily Bazelon of Slate and the Yale Law School about your terse judgment in Ricci: &#8220;The problem for Sotomayor, instead, is why she didn&#8217;t grapple with the difficult constitutional issues, the ones Cabranes pointed to. Did she really have nothing to add to the district court opinion? In a case of this magnitude and intricacy, why would that be?&#8221;<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Is the primary point of our civil rights laws to protect minorities or to protect individuals of all races?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      You have described yourself on video as &#8220;a product of affirmative action&#8221; and an &#8220;affirmative action baby&#8221; and that it is &#8220;critical that we promote diversity.&#8221; Considering your often-expressed passionate views on the topic and personal self-interest in promoting ethnic preferences, how could Frank Ricci have expected even-handed, colorblind justice from you?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Yes, but, according to the Supreme Court, Frank Ricci didn’t get justice from you, now did he?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      I realize you resent these questions, but aren’t doubts about racial bias inevitably created by the act of treating people of different races differently, acts which you endorse?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Considering the personal benefits that ethnic preferences have provided you over the years, shouldn’t you have recused yourself from the Ricci case?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Will you promise to recuse yourself in all future cases involving quotas, affirmative action, discrimination, or disparate impact?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Six years ago, in the previous major affirmative action case, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her majority decision in Gratz, &#8220;We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today. &#8221; (That’s now only 19 years from 2009.) Do you agree?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in her dissenting opinion on Ricci: &#8220;The Court&#8217;s order and opinion, I anticipate, will not have staying power.&#8221; Do you agree?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Should immigrants be eligible for racial and ethnic preferences?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Why?<br />
    *</p>
<p>      Judge Sotomayor, you were a member of the National Council of La Raza from 1998 to 2004 . What do the words &#8220;La Raza&#8221; mean in English?
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742396</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742396</guid>
		<description>Im surviving arthritis,and am wrong at least two out of three times---I think that qualifies me for SCOTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im surviving arthritis,and am wrong at least two out of three times&#8212;I think that qualifies me for SCOTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrgdds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742373</link>
		<dc:creator>jrgdds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742373</guid>
		<description>I don’t Know if Judge Sotomayer&#039;s being a Type I diabetic will help her by way of qualification, but I do know that her and &lt;a href=&quot;http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/09/more-spelling-errors-plague-obama-releases/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barak&lt;/a&gt; Obama’s socialist agenda, particularly Universal Health Care, will help her bottom line.  
Being a Type I diabetic myself, I can tell you that the use of insulin pumps is the state of the art in therapy.  Being a self employed dentist I can tell you the cost of my medical coverage using this type of therapy. 
The initial outlay for a pump is 6000 dollars, supplies and associated costs including insurance premiums, copayments, medications, laboratory tests, and doctor visits cost out of pocket 4200 per year.   
Now there are 3 million Type I diabetics in the USA.  And according to Barack Obama, As American citizens we are entitled to our medical care at taxpayer expense. And as American Citizens,  we will demand state of the art care which is insulin pump therapy.
So my neighbors and countrymen will initially lay out $18 billion for our pumps these will have to be replaced every 5 years.  And then $12.6 B per year in associated costs.  This does not include treating the 15000 people who are diagnosed with Type I Diabetes each year that will also be covered, nor does it include treating the complications of the disease that many people that share my affliction have already experienced.  
Of course this isn’t the only disease, but it is the one we really care about.  Of course there are otherOn behalf of us including Judge Sotomayer, I would like to thank everyone in the country in advance of the enactment of Universal Health Care into law for caring enough to pay for our medical needs.   We may not live longer, but at least we won’t have the stress of paying the bills.  If we need anything else, believe me, we won’t be afraid to ask.
/sarc off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t Know if Judge Sotomayer&#8217;s being a Type I diabetic will help her by way of qualification, but I do know that her and <a href="http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/09/more-spelling-errors-plague-obama-releases/" rel="nofollow">Barak</a> Obama’s socialist agenda, particularly Universal Health Care, will help her bottom line.<br />
Being a Type I diabetic myself, I can tell you that the use of insulin pumps is the state of the art in therapy.  Being a self employed dentist I can tell you the cost of my medical coverage using this type of therapy.<br />
The initial outlay for a pump is 6000 dollars, supplies and associated costs including insurance premiums, copayments, medications, laboratory tests, and doctor visits cost out of pocket 4200 per year.<br />
Now there are 3 million Type I diabetics in the USA.  And according to Barack Obama, As American citizens we are entitled to our medical care at taxpayer expense. And as American Citizens,  we will demand state of the art care which is insulin pump therapy.<br />
So my neighbors and countrymen will initially lay out $18 billion for our pumps these will have to be replaced every 5 years.  And then $12.6 B per year in associated costs.  This does not include treating the 15000 people who are diagnosed with Type I Diabetes each year that will also be covered, nor does it include treating the complications of the disease that many people that share my affliction have already experienced.<br />
Of course this isn’t the only disease, but it is the one we really care about.  Of course there are otherOn behalf of us including Judge Sotomayer, I would like to thank everyone in the country in advance of the enactment of Universal Health Care into law for caring enough to pay for our medical needs.   We may not live longer, but at least we won’t have the stress of paying the bills.  If we need anything else, believe me, we won’t be afraid to ask.<br />
/sarc off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742291</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742291</guid>
		<description>Well if she &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; get confirmed she will not last long under Obamacare. Better line up few more wise latino women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if she <em>does</em> get confirmed she will not last long under Obamacare. Better line up few more wise latino women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAThought</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742228</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAThought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742228</guid>
		<description>So, I suppose that my wife&#039;s story should be published and she should receive a key to any city we visit, based on this claptrap, right? Afterall, she is fighting Stage 4 breast cancer, has been for more than two years now.
Shouldn&#039;t I get SOME kind of medal, reward, payment for being such a hero to stick by her and not pull a Silky Pony?
I&#039;ll go back to looking forward to this rag going the way of their competitor The Seattle P-I. 

Chimps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I suppose that my wife&#8217;s story should be published and she should receive a key to any city we visit, based on this claptrap, right? Afterall, she is fighting Stage 4 breast cancer, has been for more than two years now.<br />
Shouldn&#8217;t I get SOME kind of medal, reward, payment for being such a hero to stick by her and not pull a Silky Pony?<br />
I&#8217;ll go back to looking forward to this rag going the way of their competitor The Seattle P-I. </p>
<p>Chimps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CO2 Producer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742179</link>
		<dc:creator>CO2 Producer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742179</guid>
		<description>The Seattle Times headline reads like a fifth grader&#039;s introductory sentence in the second-to-last paragraph of a persuasive essay as the student struggles to meet the requirements of the assignment.

Sotomayor may be a Hispanic woman who overcame poverty and has diabetes, but can she walk and chew gum at the same time? Can she rub her belly and pat her head simultaneously? Her path to confirmation will probably be a greased-up downhill Slip-n-Slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Seattle Times headline reads like a fifth grader&#8217;s introductory sentence in the second-to-last paragraph of a persuasive essay as the student struggles to meet the requirements of the assignment.</p>
<p>Sotomayor may be a Hispanic woman who overcame poverty and has diabetes, but can she walk and chew gum at the same time? Can she rub her belly and pat her head simultaneously? Her path to confirmation will probably be a greased-up downhill Slip-n-Slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nail49</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/10/dumbest-pro-sotomayor-op-ed-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-742124</link>
		<dc:creator>nail49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30551#comment-742124</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have a lump in my &lt;strike&gt;throat &lt;/strike&gt;butt.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rags: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; Likely the scar tissue from where the Obama Administration removed your wallet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have a lump in my <strike>throat </strike>butt.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><strong>Rags: </strong></em> Likely the scar tissue from where the Obama Administration removed your wallet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
