See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:10 pm, fighterDC said:

   Good analysis. Although I would love every opportunity to tag Obama, there are much more serious (and obvious) transgressions to worry about.

2. #2
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, rlwo2008 said:

   That is as different photo or sequence than the one on Atlas Shrugs.

3. #3
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, tpro1 said:

   I agree. This is an unnecessary parallel with Bill Clinton, but it was good for a laugh. Could they have staged it to distract from the costly health care debate? How about distracting us from the lack of serious sanctions by the G8 for Iran, over killing hundreds of their own?

4. #4
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:18 pm, flenser said:

   But the tizzy over the “ogling” photo is unfair.

   Ask Palin what “fair” has to do with anything. This is war, ain’t nothing “fair” about it. They do what they can to destroy us, we need to put down the wine glass and start fighting back. Or else just surrender.

5. #5
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, 24Klady said:

   Love the smirk on Sarkozy’s face. He’s a character, and personality plus, if nothing else.

6. #6
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, William Teach said:

   I think the photo should be taken as humor and, at worst, gentle chiding, the way you would a friend who gets caught.

   I’m hoping folks aren’t taking the photo too seriously, but, seeing a Jake Tapper tweet, looks like a few are.

7. #7
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, stevem said:

   Yup. Completely agree this is a stupid distraction.

8. #8
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, Misscheryl said:

   Regardless, if this man wants to put himself in front of the camera every chance he gets, he can expect more of it, more often and it will only get worse.

9. #9
   On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, sonofdy said:

   Although its funny to tease, both photos are innocent imho.

10. #10
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, Paul Revere said:

    I never thought he was ogling her butt. I assumed he was looking at her flats (shoes). I’m convinced he’s not straight.

11. #11
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Obi-Wandreas said:

    Even if it was true, he should just say the same thing I would:

    “I’m happily married, but I’m not dead.”

12. #12
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well, I think he’s a dope anyway, but a bigger dope if he wasn’t checking out the hottie. sorry, it’s what real men do. and it’s should not come as a big shocker.

13. #13
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    If I can seize on a moment to stick it to Hussein, I’ll take full advantage of it.

    I’m playing on their level, by their rules, and I have no problem doing so.

14. #14
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    What’s wrong with getting a laugh out of this regardless of Obama’s intentions?

    Michelle, your time is precious and I understand that you need to move (us) on to real issues but, allow us to run with your post.
    We can be YOUR surrogates!!

15. #15
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, npphotog said:

    A picture can be interpreted many ways, “worth a thousand words.” haha.

16. #16
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    That other photo is the one that cracks me up and not because I think Obama was checking out a lady’s backside. In it, to me, Berlusconi looks like he is ensuring his zipper is up (for a change after his recent sex scandals) and Medvedev looks like a dummy frozen in place without Putin there with a hand up his backside to animate him.

17. #17
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, jdtruly said:

    Well, if he wasn’t ogling the girl, what’s wrong with him? Been hanging with Barney Frank too long?

    Seriously though, there are more important things to be concerned about.

18. #18
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:34 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Yep, context matters.

19. #19
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Showed the picture to Mr. K…he said he liked what he saw (then cringed ever so slightly when he read that she was 16).
    Mr. K is my kinda guy.

20. #20
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:39 pm, tre said:

    He gives us plenty of LEGITIMATE reasons to criticize him. Bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia, giving the Queen of England an IPOD as an official gift, 57 states, believing we can spend our way to prosperity, if the Government lacks money he prints it, virtually begging the Chinese to keep lending us money, appointing tax cheats to Government jobs, nationalizing banks and GM, pushing unproven wind and solar energy over proven coal and nuclear, canceling the F22 Raptor fighter, claiming he saved a few hundred thousand jobs, his declining poll numbers, ……

    We don’t need to make up reasons to criticize him.

21. #21
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Jeddite said:

    ITP: males check out a female’s backside; many appalled

22. #22
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:53 pm, BOB said:

    I’d say he was checking out the female backside in both photos.

    Is there something abnormal about that?

23. #23
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, swede said:

    The video is inconclusive; like a Rorschach test. You’ll see what you want to see.

    The predictable exoneration from the All Barack Channel is even less compelling. I guess I’d cut him slack on this one, but make a mental note for future reference

24. #24
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    I agree with your assessment of the pics Michelle, further more I don’t care if he was checking out the rears.

    I wish he would spend a little more time in the areas Bill Clinton excelled in. Then he would have less time to screw up the rest of America.

    Besides what man wouldn’t look for an outlet if he had to go home to the White House every night to skeletor and her mother glaring at him all the time.

    Which does bring up an interesting point.

    How can anyone call themselves a comedian and not be ripping on the mother-in-law jokes that are available out there with Michelle’s mama living with them in the White House? Come-on that is a rich field of comic material, dying to be plowed.

25. #25
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:

    MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

26. #26
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, maine yankee said:

    The question is;

    Will any of the late-night hosts, who pounded the republicans over every little thing, have the courage or sense of fairness to make jokes about ‘THE ONE’ ?

27. #27
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:02 pm, Uplander said:

    It was obvious from the beginning that with the lens probably used, depth of field could have put Obama 5 or more feet closer to the lens than ‘the Girl’.
    I won’t actually stick up for President ’0′, but we have more to worry about from him as he dismantles our Constitution.

28. #28
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:04 pm, atheling said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:
    MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

    Said the bot whose unvarying opinion on any matter stretches back to years.

29. #29
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:05 pm, atheling said:

    Maybe MO was glaring at a fly on Carla Bruni’s shoulder…

30. #30
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:06 pm, sonofdy said:

    Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

    Since when do you feel this way? You regulary attack posters here and the hostess for views you disagree with.

31. #31
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, corkie said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:

    MM is a wise woman…

    So you finally admit it?

32. #32
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    I agree with MM that he wasn’t checking out the young girl’s behind.

    However, even if he was, it proves a couple of things:

    (1) He is a man.

    (2) He is not an evil robot sent from the future to destroy America.

    There are very few men who don’t notice beautiful women, and you can’t notice them without looking.

33. #33
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, bigboy said:

    Sorry Michelle, but you’re wrong on this one. Da’ Prez was doing move 39, which is the pretend to look back for a purpose while catching an eyeful. Done it myself many times. The key to identifying this is that his only interest to the rear (pardon the pun) is his junior delegate…who is ABOVE him. No one looks down at the step behind them (as ABCnews asserts) when they leave a step…unless they’ve feel they’ve stepped in something. So…he’s guilty as charged. Look, its a quick glance at a pretty stunning view; trouble is, he and his kind tell us that these natural impulses are SOOOO wrong. In other words…fry him for the hypocrisy…not the gawk.

34. #34
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, st_james said:

    From the video it’s clear he wasn’t even looking at her. End of discussion!

35. #35
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, denver republican said:

    There were plenty of photos and out-of-context quotes of President Bush that were used to “prove” his stupidity. I’m with flenser, “fair” has nothing do with it. It’s a funny picture; if it convinces someone that they shouldn’t vote for Obama in 2012, then all the better.

36. #36
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:18 pm, corkie said:

    For the record, I’m not convinced that Obama wasn’t cleverly positioning his eyes.

    If he really cared about taking the hand of the woman he was helping, then he would have looked back to find it – he wouldn’t have kept his gaze fixed as he awaited her hand to enter his vision.

    However, I don’t care if he was looking or not.

    …trying to steer the discussion away from sexism.

    BTW, who’s have a discussion about sexism?

37. #37
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, JHSII said:

    I looked at it simply – How would have the MSM and Letterman have played it if it had been GW Bush?

    Fair is fair.

    And there had better NOT be ANY complaints from the left!!

38. #38
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, lgm said:

    sonofdy said (#30):

    You regulary attack posters here and the hostess for views you disagree with.

    I argue when I disagree. I attack when attacked. You are too stupid or closed minded to see the difference.

39. #39
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, swede said:

    Can’t find sympathy for Dear Leader here, but really feel sorry for 17 yr old Mayara Tavares, from Rio. She was selected to attend an international conference of young people in conjunction with the summit. Now she’ll be forever famous only for her bodacious booty. That’s the injustice here.

40. #40
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, jdtruly said:

    denver republican said:
    There were plenty of photos and out-of-context quotes of President Bush that were used to “prove” his stupidity. I’m with flenser, “fair” has nothing do with it. It’s a funny picture; if it convinces someone that they shouldn’t vote for Obama in 2012, then all the better.

    I agree but isn’t it a frightening thought that the few votes that could make the difference about the future of civilization rests on something like this?!

41. #41
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    This is why I could never be President. I’m an ass man.

42. #42
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, sonofdy said:

    I argue when I disagree. I attack when attacked. You are too stupid or closed minded to see the difference.

    ahuh… right.

    

43. #43
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, sonofdy said:

    RSB finally said something I agree with.

44. #44
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, atheling said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    This is why I could never be President. I’m an ass

    FIFY

45. #45
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    Far more disturbing photo from G8…Obama’s PDA with Gaddafi:

    At least his eyes are nowhere near his butt.

46. #46
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, jencab said:

    I watched the video and I saw what Sarkozy saw, Obama ogling at a young girl’s bottom.
    Obama likes booty and dictators.

47. #47
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Now, can we get back to Obama ogling and molesting our wallets?

    Now, can we get back to Obama admitting that he was born a British subject?

    How can a “natural born citizen” of the United States be subject – at birth – to the laws of another country?

48. #48
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, meangreenfan said:

    If you had Michelle Obama’s BIG arse to look at every day…wouldn’t you occasionally take a gander at a nice derriere?

49. #49
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, d1carter said:

    Don’t worry the MSM will clear up any confusion…

50. #50
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, redbug70 said:

    This is one that definately needs to be lightened up on. Let us see if Letterman, Stewart and Conan make jokes about it.

51. #51
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, jsr said:

    This is one that definately needs to be lightened up on. Let us see if Letterman, Stewart and Conan make jokes about it.

    I agree. We should start referring to this incident as booty-gate.

52. #52
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:18 pm, flenser said:
    Ask Palin what “fair” has to do with anything. This is war, ain’t nothing “fair” about it. They do what they can to destroy us, we need to put down the wine glass and start fighting back. Or else just surrender.

    I tend to agree with this. I just read a comment the other day by someone named John Hawkins, and it seems appropriate here. It has to do with fighting fire with fire and not continuing to be so “nice”. “Instead of continuing to complain, here’s a better idea. Why don’t conservatives do opposition research on the journalists who are endlessly running stories about Palin and Joe the Plumber? Have these “journalists” ever been arrested? Any skeletons in their closets? Certainly Keith Olbermann’s and Maureen Dowd’s personal life is just as newsworthy as Joe the Plumber’s or Sarah Palin’s.” Which brings up the question…why are we not doing some of that? We have to stop being so polite. These people are not nice and they don’t play fair. We are doormats and that has to stop!! John McCain taught me one thing…doormats are losers.

53. #53
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    walked right into that one!

54. #54
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, Patchthebun said:

    I agree with Michelle. Lets keep our focus on what is important.

55. #55
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, Socky said:

    What about this picture, then. Coincidence?

    http://www.moonbattery.com/obama-buttwatcher2.jpg

56. #56
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, Salt said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, lgm said:

    I argue when I disagree. I attack when attacked. You are too stupid or closed minded to see the difference.

    While I will agree with you that insults and ad hominem attacks are unnecessary, your pretension at never having insulted someone here without cause is false. You often let your passion against your view of what conservatives represent get the better of you here.

    Even in this posting, you are attempting to escalate tension. To what end? That last sentence damaged the credibility of the first two.

57. #57
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, John Deaux said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:10 pm, fighterDC said:
    Good analysis. Although I would love every opportunity to tag Obama, there are much more serious (and obvious) transgressions to worry about.

    You do know “tag” has an additional meaning that you probably don’t intend here (I hope).

    I’ll give you a hint. If this photo were taken at face value, it’s what Obama would be thinking.

58. #58
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, st_james said:

    Socky, that one is indefensible. Guilty as charged!

59. #59
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Grey Fox said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:
    MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

    Just out of curiousity, how exactly does Michelle’s background play into her opinion here?

60. #60
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, AlabamaMama said:

    It’s a funny picture. Whether he’s checking her out or not. Because even if he’s totally unaware of her existence, it LOOKS like he’s checking her out. Kinda one of those “one-in-a-million” type shots.

61. #61
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    I’m less concerned w/Obie than the (presumably) unwanted uproar the media has focused on this young girl.

    She is not dressed provocatively, but in a conservative manner befitting the occasion.

    All this media attention has done is to sexualize an innocent encounter–and I’m not even sure she was aware of Obie’s presence.

    Damn you all.

62. #62
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, Salt said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    …and I’m not even sure she was aware of Obie’s presence.

    Isn’t that akin to blasphemy? Not aware of Obama’s presence?!

63. #63
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, atheling said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Point well taken.

    I wonder why we’re not protesting in front of our news outlets. They’re just as responsible for this mess as the government is.

64. #64
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:06 pm, rightwingmom said:

    MM ~ Way to keep it honest. We don’t want to stoop to the liberal left’s sleazy tactics.

    There are enough “real” serious to tackle with this administration.

    IF Obama noticed the young lady, he was more subtle that Sarkozy!

65. #65
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:08 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    I agree. Obama wasn’t ogling the girl. On the other hand, I know he was just drooling to be able to get a room alone with Momar. The look in his eyes from the second shot is unmitigated lust…

66. #66
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, Special K said:

    I also watched the video and I agree with you Michelle, much ado about nothing. That said, well, it is kind of nice, in a mean sort of way, to see The One finally getting harrassed a little over made-up nonsense–kinda like Sarah Palin only to a much less mean-spirited way.

67. #67
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Obi-Wandreas said:
    Even if it was true, he should just say the same thing I would:

    “I’m happily married, but I’m not dead.”

    Like I tell my wife, “Just because I read the menu, doesn’t mean I’m gonna order anything.”

68. #68
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, jencab said:
    I watched the video and I saw what Sarkozy saw, Obama ogling at a young girl’s bottom.
    Obama likes booty and dictators.
    Obama licks dictators boots.
    

    There, I fixed it for you.

69. #69
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, cheapseat said:

    he did ogle, who cares, even jimmah lusted in his heart, allah is obviously a butt man, as his wife has plenty o’ back, but until he does a clinton impersonation i could care less. it peeves me more that he is over there on the taxpayer dime making a world tour with his family, and then appoints czars to oversee businesses that they don’t take expensive vacations under the guise of a business meeting/convention.

70. #70
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, Rogue said:

    Michelle, I love ya, but you’re on your own on this one. You wanna turn the other cheek? That’s fine. All four of mine are bruised, battered and bloodied. Was it fair when Bush was mocked for trying to open a locked door in Beijing? Was it fair when Bush tripped on his Sedgeway? Was it fair when Bush was lambasted for the “Mission Accomplished” photo? They set the groundrules, and by god I’m playing by them.

71. #71
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Is it just me, or in the photo with Qadafi, is that Barack’s shadow or Dick Cheney’s?

72. #72
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    There’s another Michelle who isn’t going to be happy…

73. #73
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Is it just me, or in the photo with Qadafi, is that Barack’s shadow or Dick Cheney’s?

    It’s Cheney.

74. #74
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    You wanna turn the other cheek?

    Isn’t that what this photo is all about?

75. #75
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Marc said:

    What would be wrong if Mr. Obama actually checked out a beautiful woman? As long as he is not pulling an Elliot Spitzer, what is all the nonsense about? If Elle McPherson walks into a restaurant or walks on a beach, every normal male is going to look, and look in awe. It is not like Mr. Obama or any normal male admiring a beautiful woman is going to behave like Bill Clinton with Monica. I sure as heck don’t want to live in a place like Gaza where young men are arrested for looking at a fully clad woman. Please let us not become the Taliban or Hamas.

76. #76
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Rogue said:

    Aloha has a point…

77. #77
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:54 pm, BOB said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    Now, can we get back to Obama ogling and molesting our wallets?
    Now, can we get back to Obama admitting that he was born a British subject?

    How can a “natural born citizen” of the United States be subject – at birth – to the laws of anothercountry?

    Even in a throw away thread like this one I don’t think you can generate any interest in this. Either everyone is happy with the explanation Obama has given for all the secrecy on his records, (there isn’t one), or maybe they think everthing is so well hidded the truth cannot be uncovered.

    Has there ever been a thread here devoted to Obama’s legitimacy to be President?

    We really do live in strange times.

78. #78
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:57 pm, TypicalWhite said:

    lgm said: MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

    Nice try on the Sotomayor connection, but you missed it badly. MM is not being considered for Supreme Court justice, and a discussion is not a judicial hearing.

    We need people on the Supreme Court who are, as is Lady Justice, blind to diversity of opinion and background. Justices are there to apply the law, not to exercise their opinions. Sotomayor’s judgment in the CT firefighters’ case reveals a woman who is willing to place her preferences above the law. Not what we need!!

79. #79
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Marc said:

    What would be wrong if Mr. Obama actually checked out a beautiful woman?

    Geeesh… she’s 16 (or 15, depending on your source). Did you also ogle Obie’s daughter in her “peace” t-shirt.

80. #80
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, BOB said:

    Summer of silliness: Obama and the ogling freeze frame
    By Michelle Malkin • July 10, 2009 12:06 PM When President Obama bowed and scraped before the Saudi king, I gave it to him.

    And he deserved it.

    But the tizzy over the “ogling” photo is unfair.

    I just watched the video and it’s clear to me he wasn’t even paying attention to the young girl in the wine-colored dress. Obama was helping another young woman down the stairs and glancing down to grab her hand. You can see him talking to the young woman (black sweater, printed skirt) while the supposed temptress made her way up in the other direction.

    I don’t even think he saw the young girl he’s accused of checking out.

    Sarkozy is another story.

    Now, can we get back to Obama ogling and molesting our wallets?

    ***

    I know, I know. There’s another shot of him supposedly checking out another woman’s backside. Guess what? I think it’s out of context, too.

    ***

    Far more disturbing photo from G8…Obama’s PDA with Gaddafi:

    Posted in: Barack ObamaSend to a Friend
    Printer Friendly comments (79) trackbacks (3)See what others have said
    Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com’s community of registered readers. Please don’t assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

    Trackbacks
    ■‘Okie’ on the Lam » Blog Archive » Booty Call At The G-8 Summit — Will Feminist Cheer Or Jeer?
    ■Obamarama in Russia and Italy! Let’s enjoy Barack’s gaffes, mistakes, blunders and the other stupid stuff « Jim Blazsik
    ■Gazzer’s Gabfest » Barry will catch Mich-hell!
    Trackback URL

    Comments
    #1On July 10th, 2009 at 12:10 pm, fighterDC said:
    Good analysis. Although I would love every opportunity to tag Obama, there are much more serious (and obvious) transgressions to worry about.

    #2On July 10th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, rlwo2008 said:
    That is as different photo or sequence than the one on Atlas Shrugs.

    #3On July 10th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, tpro1 said:
    I agree. This is an unnecessary parallel with Bill Clinton, but it was good for a laugh. Could they have staged it to distract from the costly health care debate? How about distracting us from the lack of serious sanctions by the G8 for Iran, over killing hundreds of their own?

    #4On July 10th, 2009 at 12:18 pm, flenser said:
    But the tizzy over the “ogling” photo is unfair.
    Ask Palin what “fair” has to do with anything. This is war, ain’t nothing “fair” about it. They do what they can to destroy us, we need to put down the wine glass and start fighting back. Or else just surrender.

    #5On July 10th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, 24Klady said:
    Love the smirk on Sarkozy’s face. He’s a character, and personality plus, if nothing else.

    #6On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, William Teach said:
    I think the photo should be taken as humor and, at worst, gentle chiding, the way you would a friend who gets caught.

    I’m hoping folks aren’t taking the photo too seriously, but, seeing a Jake Tapper tweet, looks like a few are.

    #7On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, stevem said:
    Yup. Completely agree this is a stupid distraction.

    #8On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, Misscheryl said:
    Regardless, if this man wants to put himself in front of the camera every chance he gets, he can expect more of it, more often and it will only get worse.

    #9On July 10th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, sonofdy said:
    Although its funny to tease, both photos are innocent imho.

    #10On July 10th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, Paul Revere said:
    I never thought he was ogling her butt. I assumed he was looking at her flats (shoes). I’m convinced he’s not straight.

    #11On July 10th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Obi-Wandreas said:
    Even if it was true, he should just say the same thing I would:

    “I’m happily married, but I’m not dead.”

    #12On July 10th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, ajmontana said:
    Well, I think he’s a dope anyway, but a bigger dope if he wasn’t checking out the hottie. sorry, it’s what real men do. and it’s should not come as a big shocker.

    #13On July 10th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, madmonkphotog said:
    If I can seize on a moment to stick it to Hussein, I’ll take full advantage of it.

    I’m playing on their level, by their rules, and I have no problem doing so.

    #14On July 10th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, GladzKravtz said:
    What’s wrong with getting a laugh out of this regardless of Obama’s intentions?

    Michelle, your time is precious and I understand that you need to move (us) on to real issues but, allow us to run with your post.
    We can be YOUR surrogates!!

    #15On July 10th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, npphotog said:
    A picture can be interpreted many ways, “worth a thousand words.” haha.

    #16On July 10th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, Sergeant Tim said:
    That other photo is the one that cracks me up and not because I think Obama was checking out a lady’s backside. In it, to me, Berlusconi looks like he is ensuring his zipper is up (for a change after his recent sex scandals) and Medvedev looks like a dummy frozen in place without Putin there with a hand up his backside to animate him.

    #17On July 10th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, jdtruly said:
    Well, if he wasn’t ogling the girl, what’s wrong with him? Been hanging with Barney Frank too long?

    Seriously though, there are more important things to be concerned about.

    #18On July 10th, 2009 at 12:34 pm, zyzzyg said:
    Yep, context matters.

    #19On July 10th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, GladzKravtz said:
    Showed the picture to Mr. K…he said he liked what he saw (then cringed ever so slightly when he read that she was 16).
    Mr. K is my kinda guy.

    #20On July 10th, 2009 at 12:39 pm, tre said:
    He gives us plenty of LEGITIMATE reasons to criticize him. Bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia, giving the Queen of England an IPOD as an official gift, 57 states, believing we can spend our way to prosperity, if the Government lacks money he prints it, virtually begging the Chinese to keep lending us money, appointing tax cheats to Government jobs, nationalizing banks and GM, pushing unproven wind and solar energy over proven coal and nuclear, canceling the F22 Raptor fighter, claiming he saved a few hundred thousand jobs, his declining poll numbers, ……

    We don’t need to make up reasons to criticize him.

    #21On July 10th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Jeddite said:
    ITP: males check out a female’s backside; many appalled

    #22On July 10th, 2009 at 12:53 pm, BOB said:
    I’d say he was checking out the female backside in both photos.

    Is there something abnormal about that?

    #23On July 10th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, swede said:
    The video is inconclusive; like a Rorschach test. You’ll see what you want to see.

    The predictable exoneration from the All Barack Channel is even less compelling. I guess I’d cut him slack on this one, but make a mental note for future reference

    #24On July 10th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:
    I agree with your assessment of the pics Michelle, further more I don’t care if he was checking out the rears.

    I wish he would spend a little more time in the areas Bill Clinton excelled in. Then he would have less time to screw up the rest of America.

    Besides what man wouldn’t look for an outlet if he had to go home to the White House every night to skeletor and her mother glaring at him all the time.

    Which does bring up an interesting point.

    How can anyone call themselves a comedian and not be ripping on the mother-in-law jokes that are available out there with Michelle’s mama living with them in the White House? Come-on that is a rich field of comic material, dying to be plowed.

    #25On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:
    MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

    #26On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, maine yankee said:
    The question is;

    Will any of the late-night hosts, who pounded the republicans over every little thing, have the courage or sense of fairness to make jokes about ‘THE ONE’ ?

    #27On July 10th, 2009 at 1:02 pm, Uplander said:
    It was obvious from the beginning that with the lens probably used, depth of field could have put Obama 5 or more feet closer to the lens than ‘the Girl’.
    I won’t actually stick up for President ‘0′, but we have more to worry about from him as he dismantles our Constitution.

    #28On July 10th, 2009 at 1:04 pm, atheling said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:
    MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.
    Said the bot whose unvarying opinion on any matter stretches back to years.

    #29On July 10th, 2009 at 1:05 pm, atheling said:
    Maybe MO was glaring at a fly on Carla Bruni’s shoulder…

    #30On July 10th, 2009 at 1:06 pm, sonofdy said:
    Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.
    Since when do you feel this way? You regulary attack posters here and the hostess for views you disagree with.

    #31On July 10th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, corkie said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:

    MM is a wise woman…
    So you finally admit it?

    #32On July 10th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:
    I agree with MM that he wasn’t checking out the young girl’s behind.

    However, even if he was, it proves a couple of things:

    (1) He is a man.

    (2) He is not an evil robot sent from the future to destroy America.

    There are very few men who don’t notice beautiful women, and you can’t notice them without looking.

    #33On July 10th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, bigboy said:
    Sorry Michelle, but you’re wrong on this one. Da’ Prez was doing move 39, which is the pretend to look back for a purpose while catching an eyeful. Done it myself many times. The key to identifying this is that his only interest to the rear (pardon the pun) is his junior delegate…who is ABOVE him. No one looks down at the step behind them (as ABCnews asserts) when they leave a step…unless they’ve feel they’ve stepped in something. So…he’s guilty as charged. Look, its a quick glance at a pretty stunning view; trouble is, he and his kind tell us that these natural impulses are SOOOO wrong. In other words…fry him for the hypocrisy…not the gawk.

    #34On July 10th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, st_james said:
    From the video it’s clear he wasn’t even looking at her. End of discussion!

    #35On July 10th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, denver republican said:
    There were plenty of photos and out-of-context quotes of President Bush that were used to “prove” his stupidity. I’m with flenser, “fair” has nothing do with it. It’s a funny picture; if it convinces someone that they shouldn’t vote for Obama in 2012, then all the better.

    #36On July 10th, 2009 at 1:18 pm, corkie said:
    For the record, I’m not convinced that Obama wasn’t cleverly positioning his eyes.

    If he really cared about taking the hand of the woman he was helping, then he would have looked back to find it – he wouldn’t have kept his gaze fixed as he awaited her hand to enter his vision.

    However, I don’t care if he was looking or not.

    …trying to steer the discussion away from sexism.
    BTW, who’s have a discussion about sexism?

    #37On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, JHSII said:
    I looked at it simply – How would have the MSM and Letterman have played it if it had been GW Bush?

    Fair is fair.

    And there had better NOT be ANY complaints from the left!!

    #38On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, lgm said:
    sonofdy said (#30):

    You regulary attack posters here and the hostess for views you disagree with.
    I argue when I disagree. I attack when attacked. You are too stupid or closed minded to see the difference.

    #39On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, swede said:
    Can’t find sympathy for Dear Leader here, but really feel sorry for 17 yr old Mayara Tavares, from Rio. She was selected to attend an international conference of young people in conjunction with the summit. Now she’ll be forever famous only for her bodacious booty. That’s the injustice here.

    #40On July 10th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, jdtruly said:
    denver republican said:
    There were plenty of photos and out-of-context quotes of President Bush that were used to “prove” his stupidity. I’m with flenser, “fair” has nothing do with it. It’s a funny picture; if it convinces someone that they shouldn’t vote for Obama in 2012, then all the better.
    I agree but isn’t it a frightening thought that the few votes that could make the difference about the future of civilization rests on something like this?!

    #41On July 10th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    This is why I could never be President. I’m an ass man.

    #42On July 10th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, sonofdy said:
    I argue when I disagree. I attack when attacked. You are too stupid or closed minded to see the difference.
    ahuh… right.

    #43On July 10th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, sonofdy said:
    RSB finally said something I agree with.

    #44On July 10th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, atheling said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:24 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    This is why I could never be President. I’m an ass
    FIFY

    #45On July 10th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, sonofdy said:
    Far more disturbing photo from G8…Obama’s PDA with Gaddafi:
    At least his eyes are nowhere near his butt.

    #46On July 10th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, jencab said:
    I watched the video and I saw what Sarkozy saw, Obama ogling at a young girl’s bottom.
    Obama likes booty and dictators.

    #47On July 10th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    Now, can we get back to Obama ogling and molesting our wallets?
    Now, can we get back to Obama admitting that he was born a British subject?

    How can a “natural born citizen” of the United States be subject – at birth – to the laws of another country?

    #48On July 10th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, meangreenfan said:
    If you had Michelle Obama’s BIG arse to look at every day…wouldn’t you occasionally take a gander at a nice derriere?

    #49On July 10th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, d1carter said:
    Don’t worry the MSM will clear up any confusion…

    #50On July 10th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, redbug70 said:
    This is one that definately needs to be lightened up on. Let us see if Letterman, Stewart and Conan make jokes about it.

    #51On July 10th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, jsr said:
    This is one that definately needs to be lightened up on. Let us see if Letterman, Stewart and Conan make jokes about it.
    I agree. We should start referring to this incident as booty-gate.

    #52On July 10th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, happyscrapper said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:18 pm, flenser said:
    Ask Palin what “fair” has to do with anything. This is war, ain’t nothing “fair” about it. They do what they can to destroy us, we need to put down the wine glass and start fighting back. Or else just surrender.
    I tend to agree with this. I just read a comment the other day by someone named John Hawkins, and it seems appropriate here. It has to do with fighting fire with fire and not continuing to be so “nice”. “Instead of continuing to complain, here’s a better idea. Why don’t conservatives do opposition research on the journalists who are endlessly running stories about Palin and Joe the Plumber? Have these “journalists” ever been arrested? Any skeletons in their closets? Certainly Keith Olbermann’s and Maureen Dowd’s personal life is just as newsworthy as Joe the Plumber’s or Sarah Palin’s.” Which brings up the question…why are we not doing some of that? We have to stop being so polite. These people are not nice and they don’t play fair. We are doormats and that has to stop!! John McCain taught me one thing…doormats are losers.

    #53On July 10th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    walked right into that one!

    #54On July 10th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, Patchthebun said:
    I agree with Michelle. Lets keep our focus on what is important.

    #55On July 10th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, Socky said:
    What about this picture, then. Coincidence?

    http://www.moonbattery.com/obama-buttwatcher2.jpg

    #56On July 10th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, Salt said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, lgm said:

    I argue when I disagree. I attack when attacked. You are too stupid or closed minded to see the difference.
    While I will agree with you that insults and ad hominem attacks are unnecessary, your pretension at never having insulted someone here without cause is false. You often let your passion against your view of what conservatives represent get the better of you here.

    Even in this posting, you are attempting to escalate tension. To what end? That last sentence damaged the credibility of the first two.

    #57On July 10th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, John Deaux said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:10 pm, fighterDC said:
    Good analysis. Although I would love every opportunity to tag Obama, there are much more serious (and obvious) transgressions to worry about.
    You do know “tag” has an additional meaning that you probably don’t intend here (I hope).

    I’ll give you a hint. If this photo were taken at face value, it’s what Obama would be thinking.

    #58On July 10th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, st_james said:
    Socky, that one is indefensible. Guilty as charged!

    #59On July 10th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Grey Fox said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, lgm said:
    MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.
    Just out of curiousity, how exactly does Michelle’s background play into her opinion here?

    #60On July 10th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, AlabamaMama said:
    It’s a funny picture. Whether he’s checking her out or not. Because even if he’s totally unaware of her existence, it LOOKS like he’s checking her out. Kinda one of those “one-in-a-million” type shots.

    #61On July 10th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, Tazed and Confused said:
    I’m less concerned w/Obie than the (presumably) unwanted uproar the media has focused on this young girl.

    She is not dressed provocatively, but in a conservative manner befitting the occasion.

    All this media attention has done is to sexualize an innocent encounter–and I’m not even sure she was aware of Obie’s presence.

    Damn you all.

    #62On July 10th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, Salt said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    …and I’m not even sure she was aware of Obie’s presence.
    Isn’t that akin to blasphemy? Not aware of Obama’s presence?!

    #63On July 10th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, atheling said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Point well taken.

    I wonder why we’re not protesting in front of our news outlets. They’re just as responsible for this mess as the government is.

    #64On July 10th, 2009 at 2:06 pm, rightwingmom said:
    MM ~ Way to keep it honest. We don’t want to stoop to the liberal left’s sleazy tactics.

    There are enough “real” serious to tackle with this administration.

    IF Obama noticed the young lady, he was more subtle that Sarkozy!

    #65On July 10th, 2009 at 2:08 pm, yohannbiimu said:
    I agree. Obama wasn’t ogling the girl. On the other hand, I know he was just drooling to be able to get a room alone with Momar. The look in his eyes from the second shot is unmitigated lust…

    #66On July 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, Special K said:
    I also watched the video and I agree with you Michelle, much ado about nothing. That said, well, it is kind of nice, in a mean sort of way, to see The One finally getting harrassed a little over made-up nonsense–kinda like Sarah Palin only to a much less mean-spirited way.

    #67On July 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Obi-Wandreas said:
    Even if it was true, he should just say the same thing I would:

    “I’m happily married, but I’m not dead.”
    Like I tell my wife, “Just because I read the menu, doesn’t mean I’m gonna order anything.”

    #68On July 10th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, jencab said:
    I watched the video and I saw what Sarkozy saw, Obama ogling at a young girl’s bottom.
    Obama likes booty and dictators.
    Obama licks dictators boots.

    There, I fixed it for you.
    #69On July 10th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, cheapseat said:
    he did ogle, who cares, even jimmah lusted in his heart, allah is obviously a butt man, as his wife has plenty o’ back, but until he does a clinton impersonation i could care less. it peeves me more that he is over there on the taxpayer dime making a world tour with his family, and then appoints czars to oversee businesses that they don’t take expensive vacations under the guise of a business meeting/convention.

    #70On July 10th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, Rogue said:
    Michelle, I love ya, but you’re on your own on this one. You wanna turn the other cheek? That’s fine. All four of mine are bruised, battered and bloodied. Was it fair when Bush was mocked for trying to open a locked door in Beijing? Was it fair when Bush tripped on his Sedgeway? Was it fair when Bush was lambasted for the “Mission Accomplished” photo? They set the groundrules, and by god I’m playing by them.

    #71On July 10th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Is it just me, or in the photo with Qadafi, is that Barack’s shadow or Dick Cheney’s?

    #72On July 10th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    There’s another Michelle who isn’t going to be happy…

    #73On July 10th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Is it just me, or in the photo with Qadafi, is that Barack’s shadow or Dick Cheney’s?
    It’s Cheney.

    #74On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    You wanna turn the other cheek?
    Isn’t that what this photo is all about?

    #75On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Marc said:
    What would be wrong if Mr. Obama actually checked out a beautiful woman? As long as he is not pulling an Elliot Spitzer, what is all the nonsense about? If Elle McPherson walks into a restaurant or walks on a beach, every normal male is going to look, and look in awe. It is not like Mr. Obama or any normal male admiring a beautiful woman is going to behave like Bill Clinton with Monica. I sure as heck don’t want to live in a place like Gaza where young men are arrested for looking at a fully clad woman. Please let us not become the Taliban or Hamas.

    #76On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Rogue said:
    Aloha has a point…

    #77On July 10th, 2009 at 2:54 pm, BOB said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    Now, can we get back to Obama ogling and molesting our wallets?
    Now, can we get back to Obama admitting that he was born a British subject?

    How can a “natural born citizen” of the United States be subject – at birth – to the laws of anothercountry?
    Even in a throw away thread like this one I don’t think you can generate any interest in this. Either everyone is happy with the explanation Obama has given for all the secrecy on his records, (there isn’t one), or maybe they think everthing is so well hidded the truth cannot be uncovered.

    Has there ever been a thread here devoted to Obama’s legitimacy to be President?

    We really do live in strange times.

    #78On July 10th, 2009 at 2:57 pm, TypicalWhite said:
    lgm said: MM is a wise woman, trying to steer the discussion away from sexism. Her background clearly gives her a different perspective on certain issues. Diversity of opinion and background is a good thing.

    Nice try on the Sotomayor connection, but you missed it badly. MM is not being considered for Supreme Court justice, and a discussion is not a judicial hearing.

    We need people on the Supreme Court who are, as is Lady Justice, blind to diversity of opinion and background. Justices are there to apply the law, not to exercise their opinions. Sotomayor’s judgment in the CT firefighters’ case reveals a woman who is willing to place her preferences above the law. Not what we need!!

    #79On July 10th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, Tazed and Confused said:
    On July 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Marc said:

    What would be wrong if Mr. Obama actually checked out a beautiful woman?
    Geeesh… she’s 16 (or 15, depending on your source). Did you also ogle Obie’s daughter in her “peace” t-shirt.

    I doubt her age was written on her butt.

81. #81
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, BOB said:

    Sorry, I have no idea how I put all that stuff there…don’t be angry.

82. #82
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, sergeantmajorbill said:

    If this were GWB in the picture what would tomorrow’s front page picture be and what would the caption say underneath it? Until everyone understands that the “other side” does not have a rule book nor an etiquette book that they go by we are going to be losers. They lie (look at what Obama said to get elected), they cheat (does Federal Income Tax ring a bell) and they steal (or do you have $90,000 in your freezer?), in other words they do anything to get elected and the media go right along with it. They have the money and the media on their side, but we have the majority on ours. Forget a teaparty in the local park – how about at their front door? If you don’t have the intestinal fortitude (I am being nice here) to play the same way they do, we are always going to be losers and God help our country – because you are not helping at all.

83. #83
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, Dave Turson said:

    Far more disturbing photo from G8…Obama’s PDA with Gaddafi:

    The One is not fooling me, he really wants what Gaddafi’s got — Amazon bodyguards.

    Hey, getting chummy with Gaddafi could’ve led to a late-night meeting across the street:
    

    Gaddafi’s private, all-female Amazon Guard will stay in a building next to the headquarters of the tax police, across the street from where US president Barack Obama is expected to be housed.

84. #84
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, AntonK said:

    Interesting. This frame-by-frame forensic analysis of the Obama ass-staring film is not as certain as Michelle Malkin is about the President’s demeanor.

85. #85
    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I’m with you SergeantMajorBill on this one. Stop playing decent with people who don’t like us. I would cringe many times when the media insulted President Bush with their headlines and misconstrued sentences ensuring they made him look bad, angry, or worse insane. Enough already! Time to fight fire with fire–no more Mr. Nice Guy where Obama is concerned–we need to point out every single flaw he has and there are MANY.
    Mr. Red State Skeptic #41–you made me smile with your post!
    LGM – Please, just shut up.

86. #86
    On July 10th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, sbw999 said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, sergeantmajorbill said:
    If this were GWB in the picture what would tomorrow’s front page picture be and what would the caption say underneath it? Until everyone understands that the “other side” does not have a rule book nor an etiquette book that they go by we are going to be losers.

    I agree with you to an extent..nice guys finish last yada yada. But hey..whose ox do you think will get gored if we make a big deal of this? Do you think a corrupt media, and an immoral dem electorate that didnt give a crap about their President getting a BJ from an intern in the Oval Orifice is going to care about The One checking out the junk of a 17 year old??? Not a chance. We should just move on, and fight another battle another day.

87. #87
    On July 10th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Note to self:

    Re-watch ‘Fear of a Black Hat’.

88. #88
    On July 10th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, RachelD said:

    I’m unconvinced the President is a butt man, but I bet he had some ‘splainin to do to the missus.
    However, Sarkozy is definitely a butt man. Wow. That was a peep.

89. #89
    On July 10th, 2009 at 4:40 pm, bmac727 said:

    Dear Michelle et al -
    If you’re excusing Hussein Obama al Potusi based on the video – then you should re-watch it in slo-mo. “O-man” could care less about the woman behind him until she reaches out, yet ABC, etc., just feel they have to make excuses for their One, rather than let us decide for ourselves. Hey, maybe he turned and looked at the girl because he thought he felt power flow from him because she touched his suit.

90. #90
    On July 10th, 2009 at 4:59 pm, bruins90210 said:

    I’ve watched the ABC video and I agree with bmac727. I think he was definitely checking out her bottom until that woman in the background got in his way. His expression looked to me like he was thinking, “gee, I didn’t know they came that small.”

91. #91
    On July 10th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, Uplander said:

    I’m convinced that Barry was first attracted by that ‘Huge; – Tract a land’.
    Arguably the Biggest Booty of any ‘First Lady’ in history. This does not though, make Barry a ‘Leg & A$$ ‘ man.
    Boys that were abandoned by their Father are more likely to be attracted to Mammary Glands thru their encounters with…
    You may continue from there.
    We will experience the wrath of an abandoned impotent little boy.

92. #92
    On July 10th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, Bruce said:

    Just IMAGINE what would be going on right now if G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, or Mark Sanford were caught on video lusting after a 16 year old’s a$$. It would be NON-STOP in the around-the-clock news cycles, the night time comedy shows, and every single appearance by a Hollywood actor.

    This man is clearly captivated by the girl’s booty, and the comparison between this event and Bill Clinton’s exploits is not only valid, but is fair.

    Those of us who are Conservatives respect women and repudiate Democrat’s habitual demeaning and victimization of women by Democrat beasts just as readily as we do similar behavior by Republicans.

    All I know, is that this is a clear indication that Clintonesque female issues may well be an ingredient in the enigma of the Obama fraud… only now we have the added issue of “preferring children.”

93. #93
    On July 10th, 2009 at 5:59 pm, Bruce said:

    P.S. As a Conservative that respects women, I am quite disappointed that you have chosen to give O-bum-a a pass on what is an obvious demonstration of “issues” that – until now – have been kept out of the public mix.

    Another P.S. It’s amazing that one commenter thinks that this was actually a staged event designed to distract Americans from the more weighty issues of Obama’s apologies and betrayals of the USA in yet another foreign forum. What’s equally amazing is that *so much of Obama is staged* that we almost automatically consider such a scenario to be plausible.

94. #94
    On July 10th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, BOB said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, Bruce said:
    All I know, is that this is a clear indication that Clintonesque female issues may well be an ingredient in the enigma of the Obama fraud… only now we have the added issue of “preferring children.”

    From the view that he had how could he tell how old she was? I hate defending Obama, but the “preferring children” charge related to this non-issue is way over the top.

95. #95
    On July 10th, 2009 at 6:34 pm, Jeff said:

    I doubt her age was written on her butt.

    Butt, that’s why he was checking it so closely…

    

96. #96
    On July 10th, 2009 at 6:49 pm, Misscheryl said:

    It’s confirmed…he likes butts

    look

97. #97
    On July 10th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, BOB said:

    On July 10th, 2009 at 6:49 pm, Misscheryl said:
    It’s confirmed…he likes butts

    look

    I did, and for his sake, I hope so!!

98. #98
    On July 10th, 2009 at 7:37 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    Whether he was looking or not, the composition of the picture makes it look that way. Just looking at the picture, with no other words about whether it’s in context or not, reminds me of this saying:
    That’s funny, I don’t care who ya are!!! (LTCG)

99. #99
    On July 10th, 2009 at 9:14 pm, edward cropper said:

    Check my blog for another view of our ogling Prez

100. #100
     On July 10th, 2009 at 9:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:

     There’s only one way to know for sure – rerun the video of TOTUS. If it says “Baby got back” we’ll know…