See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On July 14th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, purplepeep said:

   BOB said:
   Where were you born?
   Are you a US citizen?

   RE: the case at hand, it looks like the Telepromptered One may have just blinked:

   From the atty:

   It looks like we won already and not just on any day, on Bastille day

   News report:
   Soldier who says Obama isn’t president doesn’t have to deploy

2. #102
   On July 14th, 2009 at 9:10 pm, BOB said:

   On July 14th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, purplepeep said:
   BOB said:
   Where were you born?
   Are you a US citizen?
   RE: the case at hand, it looks like the Telepromptered One may have just blinked:

   From the atty:

   It looks like we won already and not just on any day, on Bastille day

   News report:
   Soldier who says Obama isn’t president doesn’t have to deploy

   I would think the implications of that would be huge.

3. #103
   On July 14th, 2009 at 9:18 pm, purplepeep said:

   BOB said:
   “On July 14th, 2009 at 8:38 pm,
   RE: the case at hand, it looks like the Telepromptered One may have just blinked:
   From the atty:
   It looks like we won already and not just on any day, on Bastille day
   News report:
   Soldier who says Obama isn’t president doesn’t have to deploy”

   I would think the implications of that would be huge.

   We’ll have to wait and see, BOB, but this very sudden & odd 180 is a sign that somebody wants to avoid having a legal hearing where Obama’s BC is at issue.

4. #104
   On July 14th, 2009 at 9:30 pm, BOB said:

   On July 14th, 2009 at 9:18 pm, purplepeep said:
   We’ll have to wait and see, BOB, but this very sudden & odd 180 is a sign that somebody wants to avoid having a legal hearing where Obama’s BC is at issue.

   Good point, I don’t want to get all excited for nothing. lol

5. #105
   On July 14th, 2009 at 9:59 pm, jangar said:

   What are the “other records”?

   All the times he renounced his US citizenship to live in a muslim country?

   I dunno…you tell me.

6. #106
   On July 14th, 2009 at 10:43 pm, BOB said:

   Here’s a few of the “other records” along with Obama’s birth certificate – that are not available, including Obama’s kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

   Not an all encompassing list, but you should get the idea.

7. #107
   On July 14th, 2009 at 10:43 pm, purplepeep said:

   BOB said:
   Good point, I don’t want to get all excited for nothing. lol

   Your point is a good one, too, though.

   This deveopment – the sudden 180 – is an important milestone even tho the journey is a long one.

8. #108
   On July 15th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, William said:

   On July 14th, 2009 at 4:41 pm, FirstSkirt said:

   William – you’re killin’ me. I laughed ’til I cried (for more reasons than I can state here). You’re one funny guy!

   FirstSkirt,

   Thank you for taking the time to express your sentiment and reaction to those posts.

   I appreciate your response.

   Take care.

   William

9. #109
   On July 15th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, purealchemy said:

   On July 14th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, cabrerski said:
   purealchemy,

   Did you miss this? Obama’s birth certificate has been released…

   http://sbynews.blogspot.com/2009/07/salisbury-news-exclusive-obama-birth.html

   There, that ought to end all this mess…

   Are you being serious or sarcarstic?

10. #110
    On July 15th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, purealchemy said:

    On July 14th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, swede said:
    purealchemy said:
    Here’s the deal. If you want people to engage you or take you seriously, check your facts and provide links. Americans for Freedom of Info does not exist. It’s a hoax. There is no article in Daily Mail or AP, and if there is a transcript, no evidence provided that Barry Soetoro = Dear Leader.

    This is a hoax flying around blogs and is less credible than the great Dan Rather Bush TX Air National Guard document drop.

    Stay focused please.

    I posted that, in part, to see if anyone else knew anything about it.
    Even if that organization is a hoax, there still may be something to the claim. Most of Obama’s other important records have been barred from release also, as is noted in some subsequent postings here.

11. #111
    On July 15th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, purealchemy said:

    Correction: previous postings.

12. #112
    On July 15th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    William #108: Seems like it’s getting harder and harder to enjoy a good joke, so let’s conservatives not lose our sense of humor–it’s actually good for our health. I so enjoy a chuckle from the posters here who are intelligent and witty! Keep ‘em coming–who knew TOTUS could be so funny. Thanks….

13. #113
    On July 15th, 2009 at 3:44 pm, BOB said:

    Latest news is the Department of Defense has had the soldier who questioned Obambi’s eligibility fired from his civilian job.

    Is this why so many people are afraid to even discuss this subject?

    http://www.wnd.com

14. #114
    On July 15th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, purealchemy said:

    Here’s the deal. If you want people to engage you or take you seriously, check your facts and provide links. Americans for Freedom of Info does not exist. It’s a hoax.</blockquote

    Actually, I did see the hoax claims before posting that but I’ve found that snopes,urban legends, etc, are not what I would call 100% objective and tend to lean left. I trust the people here more.

15. #115
    On July 15th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, purealchemy said:

    That Major Cook is very brave, a true patriot!

16. #116
    On July 15th, 2009 at 7:54 pm, cabrerski said:

    On July 15th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, purealchemy said:
    Are you being serious or sarcarstic?

    Sorry…/sarc off. There, that was needed at the end of my last.

    (I think under Obamacare, I will end up with the second doctor – MIKE).

17. #117
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, purealchemy said:

    Thank you sir, or madam,

    I was feeling beaten up by the Swede.

    Martha

18. #118
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:27 pm, purealchemy said:

    Under Obamacare, the old people will be left to die.
    Soylent Green is coming.

19. #119
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:34 pm, purealchemy said:

    (I think under Obamacare, I will end up with the second doctor – MIKE).

    Who is the second doctor?

20. #120
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, cabrerski said:

    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, purealchemy said:
    Thank you sir, or madam,

    Still a sir, but who knows? Under ObamaCare high testosterone levels may warrant forced sex-change operations. May force be into liberalism yet.

21. #121
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:36 pm, cabrerski said:

    In the link, the second doctor who signed Obama’s supposed birth certificate.

22. #122
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, cabrerski said:

    …May force be into liberalism yet

    Correction: May be forced into liberalism yet.

    Sorry, my English better getting

23. #123
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, purealchemy said:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbJTBBoDFH0

    I’ve never tried to make a link here before but if this is accessible, it will be supremely meaningful.

24. #124
    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:57 pm, purealchemy said:

    youtube:

    Soylent Green: Sol goes home.

    Saw article online that Brits are going to Switzerland for assisted suicide.

    Anyone heard about that?

25. #125
    On July 15th, 2009 at 9:28 pm, cabrerski said:

    Soylent Green: Sol goes home.

    OMG, “Eight is Enough” killed “Little Ceasar”. I haven’t seen that movie since it came out in 1973.

    Remind me not to eat those guacamole-flavored chips tonight.

26. #126
    On July 16th, 2009 at 9:45 am, swede said:

    On July 15th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, purealchemy said:
    I was feeling beaten up by the Swede.

    purealchemy – My appologies if you felt beaten up, that was not the point or intent. One reason I follow MM is that when she posts something here it has been fact checked and verified. When I read your post, my first reaction was wow, if true this is huge. At the same time my BS alarm was going off. It took only a few minutes to confirm.

    The real story is Maj. Cook refused to deploy and filed suit in civil court challenging Obama’s eligibility as his commander. His orders to deploy were then recinded. That is verified. Could mean many things, including the administration wanting the issue to go away.

    All the other info (Occidental transctipt etc) is bogus, and if we continue to perpetuate it, the truth and real issue gets burried in the garbage and discredited. I suspect that was the very intent of the hoax. That’s why we need to stay focused.

    I appreciate your contributions here, and really don’t want to discourage you. God knows we need all the help we can get! Thanks!

27. #127
    On July 16th, 2009 at 10:08 am, Misscheryl said:

    Swede said: The real story is Maj. Cook refused to deploy and filed suit in civil court challenging Obama’s eligibility as his commander. His orders to deploy were then recinded. That is verified. Could mean many things, including the administration wanting the issue to go away

    and

    3:44 pm, BOB said:
    Latest news is the Department of Defense has had the soldier who questioned Obambi’s eligibility fired from his civilian job.

    Is this why so many people are afraid to even discuss this subject?

    God forbid anarchy break out here, this is indicative of where the DOD would come down. No surprise I guess. Could be just the beginning. DOD – Obama’s personal tool.

28. #128
    On July 16th, 2009 at 11:53 am, purealchemy said:

    On July 16th, 2009 at 9:45 am, swede said</blockquote

    Thanks for the response.
    I probably should have prefaced with a question like, “Does anyone know anything about this? Is it totally a hoax or is there some truth in it?”
    Anyway, yes, I agree, that the Major Cook story is much bigger. Especially being terminated from his civilian job.
    Unless than turns out to be misinformation also. Who knows until it gets kicked around for awhile.

29. #129
    On July 16th, 2009 at 11:56 am, purealchemy said:

    God forbid anarchy break out here, this is indicative of where the DOD would come down. No surprise I guess. Could be just the beginning. DOD – Obama’s personal tool.

    Everything else is becoming Obama’s personal tool. Next thing is no dissent allowed in the military even if it falls in the “Whistleblower” category.

30. #130
    On July 16th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, swede said:

    Is it totally a hoax or is there some truth in it?

    purealchemy – The problem is that if some of a report proves false, the cridibility of the whole is in question. Here, the “smoking gun” would be the Occidental transcript, and documented proof that Barry Soertoro was actually Obama. Without that, the story is meaningless. If it existed, it would be all over Drudge and Fox in a heartbeat. Some other clues that signal BS in the story:

    1. Quick google check re: Americans for FOI, the group supposedly holding the smoking gun. Bogus.

    2. Always question lots of authoritative sounding sources without links or specifics.

    - AP Washington and Daily Mail = no related story.

    - Scalia and SCOTUS don’t hear cases based on pressure from “groups”, but on the merits of the cases.

    - Gary Kreep of the US Justice Foundation. Things that make you go hmmmm.

    If this transcript happens to turn up and is verified, I will rejoice in eating my words! ‘Till then we need to move on.

    Again, I value your input, and am sorry if I was too abrupt. Lets get Dear Leader out of our mysery!

31. #131
    On July 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, purealchemy said:

    Thanks a bunch, Swede!

    I generally concur with your research techniques and I am a Fox Cable news and Drudge junkie.
    For myself, with a background of being a dyed-in-the-wool John Birch Society person, trained on my mother’s knee, I find that even as thrilled as I am that there’s a truly viable conservative media challenge to the MSM, there’s still a level of investigation I’m hoping to find that still isn’t there.
    JBS made a huge breakthrough recently when the Pres. John McManus, made it to Judge Napolitano’s online show by popular vote. Napolitano conceded that growing up the Birch Society was considered “taboo”. That means “nutty”, just like Major Cook was labelled for protesting Obama’s citizenship.
    What the Birch Society has been warning about for decades is coming to fruition.
    This is real. It’s not some UFO stuff.
    As usual, people don’t listen until it is too late.

32. #132
    On July 16th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, purealchemy said:

    Other than JBS, a highly trusted source is Aaron Klein on WorldNetDaily.
    Some of his investigation seems to have filtered to Fox regarding ACORN. Or maybe they got it some other way. Who knows?

33. #133
    On July 16th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, purealchemy said:

    http://youtube.5aa5.com/viewNuU-T_Di4cQ.html

    trying to post a link but a new skill for me

34. #134
    On July 16th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, purealchemy said:

    Okay, link doesn’t seem to work. Can’t chew gum and walk at same time.

    In lieu of link, try youtube search for Freedom Watch 21, Part 2.

35. #135
    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm, Misscheryl said:

    2:32 pm, purealchemy said:
    Can’t chew gum and walk at same time.

    That’s my line – sheesh! Everything I touch today, I mess up! Me thinks I’ll take a break from commenting for awhile.

36. #136
    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, purealchemy said:

    I know you said got the wrong thread.
    I know how that feels.
    Are you a girl? I’m a girl.
    My take is it’s mostly guys here.
    What do you think?

37. #137
    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, Misscheryl said:

    I don’t think it has anything to do with it. I think we have good days and we have bad ones..I’m for sure having a bad one.

    Hope yours is better

38. #138
    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:16 pm, purealchemy said:

    Please tell me about your bad day, girlfriend!

39. #139
    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, purealchemy said:

    I feel your pain!

40. #140
    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, purealchemy said:

    Talk to me!

    Enquring minds want to know!

41. #141
    On July 16th, 2009 at 4:08 pm, cabrerski said:

    On July 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, purealchemy said:
    My take is it’s mostly guys here.
    What do you think?

    It’s probably 70% male, 29% female, and 1% lgm.

42. #142
    On July 16th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, purealchemy said:

    HA! Think you are right!

43. #143
    On July 16th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, swede said:

    purealchemy said:

    What the Birch Society has been warning about for decades is coming to fruition.
    This is real. It’s not some UFO stuff.
    As usual, people don’t listen until it is too late.

    Exactly right! Which is again why we need to stay focused and not propagate rumors unless verifiable. The Birch Society lost credibility by Wilkins et al making some rather radical accusations that could not be backed up, causing even Wm F Buckly to distance himself from them. So their voice is not heard, even though they are right on target.

    People are beginning to listen now. Dear Leader’s job approval is sinking fast, and in some polls already negative. Lets focus on the specifics of why the stimulus in nonsense, Cap and Trade Tax, and the health care nonsense. People are already seeing this swill for what it is and calling fowl.

    BTW, I would put the male/female ratio here at closer to 50/50. And personally, I think the ladies add more depth and style. But don’t tell anyone I said so, I’ll deny it. Kind of interesting that you can usually tell the gender by the writing.

44. #144
    On July 16th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, cabrerski said:

    On July 16th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, swede said:
    And personally, I think the ladies add more depth and style. But don’t tell anyone I said so, I’ll deny it.

    Swede, you are so on target…Love having the grace and beauty of the ladies in our little corner of the blogosphere. But you can tell everyone, I won’t deny I said it.

45. #145
    On July 17th, 2009 at 1:35 am, purealchemy said:

    On July 16th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, swede said:

    The Birch Society lost credibility by Wilkins et al making some rather radical accusations that could not be backed up, causing even Wm F Buckly to distance himself from them. So their voice is not heard, even though they are right on target.

    Was that involving allegations of Communist affiliations?

46. #146
    On July 17th, 2009 at 1:37 am, purealchemy said:

    BTW, I would put the male/female ratio here at closer to 50/50. And personally, I think the ladies add more depth and style.

    I’d say closer to 80/20. Not sure about greater depth and style. Everyone here is sharp, knows their stuff and damn witty!

47. #147
    On July 17th, 2009 at 2:33 am, purealchemy said:

    Wonder if the Birch Society knew about Dear Leader’s mentor or “real father”, Frank Marshall Davis. There’s seems to be pretty of proof he was a Commie.