governments might resort to it if more humane population control mechanisms were not found.

“More humane” ways of getting rid of undesirable humans? Gas chambers, perhaps? (Already been tried)

Holdren was not advocating forced abortion. He was stating the obvious fact that governments might resort to it if more humane population control mechanisms were not found.

I call total BS on this. What the hell is it with you liberals? You always – always – say one thing, but when it gets you in hot water or questioned, what you said is suddenly not what you meant.

It doesn’t matter what Holdren’s “motives” were.

The fact that this is out there (along with your ubiquitous “humane population control” comment) is chilling. Forced abortion and sterilization – for any reason – is immoral, wrong, a violation of human rights and dignity and, frankly, evil.

There is no discernible difference between your defense of Holden’s ideologies and the myriad tyrants and their passive supporters who allowed genocide and extermination to take place throughout the ages.

Not if there were careers and reputations to protect. Just like the Global Warming crowd.

Right, you think it’s a conspiracy. Nonsense. Global Warming isn’t even in the same ballpark. The truth is; GW has become so politicized that real debate is impossible. On the one hand you have people denying that the greenhouse effect even exists (which is absurd) and on the other had you have folks that basically want to shut down the economy and are scared sh|tless of nuclear power.

Are you “open-minded” enough to read material from “flat-Earthers?” Of course not. Realize this: if you are too “open-minded” your brain will fall out.

Dinosaurs and humans did not coexist. It’s patently obvious for so many reasons it’s hard to even know where to begin.