See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On July 14th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, tiredofit08 said:

   PRLDEF…run, duck, cover, evade the question on taxpayer funded abortions for medicaid….geeze…

2. #102
   On July 14th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, rooster said:

   As an American who grew up in the Detroit area and served and retired from the Army, I once had great pride and respect for the USA!

3. #103
   On July 14th, 2009 at 5:13 pm, WarEagle82 said:

   It is kind of odd. She is lying and she knows we know she is lying. Everybody on the Senate knows she is lying. Virtually everyone in the country knows she is lying. And she is going to get confirmed.

   What happened to this nation in the last 40 years? It used to be wrong to lie. It used to be stupid to lie when you know they know you are lying!

4. #104
   On July 14th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, jjmurphy said:

   It is kind of odd. She is lying and she knows we know she is lying. Everybody on the Senate knows she is lying. Virtually everyone in the country knows she is lying.

   Shhhhhh, WarEagle. You don’t want to upset the careful facade built over the years.

5. #105
   On July 14th, 2009 at 6:27 pm, Ragspierre said:

   Virtually everyone in the country knows she is lying.

   War, the problem is that MOST of the country doesn’t even know who she is.

   One thing that we have to keep in mind is that WE understand…and care profoundly about…many matters that the majority of Americans are blissfully (or dangerously) ignorant of.

   We can grouse about that…but I think it means we have a job of education to do.

6. #106
   On July 14th, 2009 at 6:40 pm, MtsEdge said:

   Since this is the most recent thread on Sotomayor, may I add that I watched just a GLIMPSE of the “hearings” today. The part where Graham does most of the talking instead of letting the candidate speak for herself. Which would have been VERY telling, esp. the part where I thought he was brilliantly (I gave him too much credit) pretending to look for his notes w/the exact quote about the “wise Latina”…then he asked her to repeat the quote for him…then he INTERRUPTED HER when he found his notes!! What an ijit!! Reminded me of Christopher Darden w/the infamous glove at the OJ trial, only instead of giving the defendant control of the evidence, Graham WRESTS it away from the defendant, only to DESTROY THE EVIDENCE.

7. #107
   On July 14th, 2009 at 6:44 pm, chapoutier said:

   Dude, the Bronx is packed with heat.

   I know. I lived there for 4 years. However much heat there is, me thinks those folks are probably not signing up for the NRA.

8. #108
   On July 15th, 2009 at 8:41 am, jangar said:

   War, the problem is that MOST of the country doesn’t even know who she is.

   Even so, Obama won, Democrats hold the majority, and neither care a rats a$$ what America thinks. We can burn up the switchboard on every bill/nomination that reaches he floor, but in the end they will do what they want…until this time next year when the campaigns are in full swing.

9. #109
   On July 15th, 2009 at 9:48 am, tiredofit08 said:

   I’ll post this in day 3 when it starts…from the WP…blinky is back at it again today…Cornyn is backing her into a corner and I hope he digs in deeper…she is showing her colors (bad ones)…personally I do not like this woman at all let alone as a judge..I would hate to be in her court for any reason.

   When Leahy asked her to explain her controversial remark about the superior judgment of a “wise Latina woman,” she blinked no fewer than 247 times during her answer. When Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) asked her about the same remark, she blinked an additional 146 times. Her overall blink rate, measured in BPM, or blinks per minute, appeared to be between 90 and 100. Sessions asked her about her ruling in the Ricci case on racial preferences. She blinked another 121 times.

   Will Supreme Court ethics rules allow her to sign a sponsorship deal with Visine for some product placement on the bench?

10. #110
    On July 15th, 2009 at 6:40 pm, michele hampton said:

    “Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he could end up voting for Sotomayor but wants to make sure she is the judge with what he called a moderately liberal record, not a liberal activist.”

    quote from foxnews.com

    Enough said…we are screwed!