<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor, the &#8220;Wise Latina,&#8221; Confirmed by Senate for SCOTUS, 68-31 &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-769405</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor, the &#8220;Wise Latina,&#8221; Confirmed by Senate for SCOTUS, 68-31 &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-769405</guid>
		<description>[...] reading: Michelle Malkin: The end of SCOTUS Kabuki theater and Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading: Michelle Malkin: The end of SCOTUS Kabuki theater and Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As Expected: Senate Panel Endorses SCOTUS Nominee Sonia Sotomayor in 13-6 Vote &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-757555</link>
		<dc:creator>As Expected: Senate Panel Endorses SCOTUS Nominee Sonia Sotomayor in 13-6 Vote &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-757555</guid>
		<description>[...] U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Victims Michelle Malkin: The end of SCOTUS Kabuki theater and Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Victims Michelle Malkin: The end of SCOTUS Kabuki theater and Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Human Trend &#187; Sotomayor Attempts to Explain Racist &#8220;Wise Latina&#8221; Remarks &#8230;Update: Dems Misstate Sotomayor&#8217;s Horrid Record</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-748724</link>
		<dc:creator>Human Trend &#187; Sotomayor Attempts to Explain Racist &#8220;Wise Latina&#8221; Remarks &#8230;Update: Dems Misstate Sotomayor&#8217;s Horrid Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-748724</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin added this: Soto re-explains her wise Latina comments: It was a &#8220;bad play on words&#8221; that &#8220;fell flat.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin added this: Soto re-explains her wise Latina comments: It was a &#8220;bad play on words&#8221; that &#8220;fell flat.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franken &#38; Sotomayor Share &#8216;Perry Mason&#8217; Memories&#8230; Franken Loves the Sound of His Own Voice &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-747525</link>
		<dc:creator>Franken &#38; Sotomayor Share &#8216;Perry Mason&#8217; Memories&#8230; Franken Loves the Sound of His Own Voice &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-747525</guid>
		<description>[...] Court Floyd and Mary Beth Brown&#8217;s Blog: Sotomayor’s Selective Empathy Michelle Malkin: Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court Floyd and Mary Beth Brown&#8217;s Blog: Sotomayor’s Selective Empathy Michelle Malkin: Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele hampton</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-746351</link>
		<dc:creator>michele hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-746351</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he could end up voting for Sotomayor but wants to make sure she is the judge with what he called a moderately liberal record, not a liberal activist.&quot;

quote from foxnews.com

Enough said...we are screwed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he could end up voting for Sotomayor but wants to make sure she is the judge with what he called a moderately liberal record, not a liberal activist.&#8221;</p>
<p>quote from foxnews.com</p>
<p>Enough said&#8230;we are screwed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745639</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745639</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reactions From The Rightosphere To The Sotomayor Hearings...&lt;/strong&gt;

Unfortunately, with the number of votes the Democrats have, Sonya Sotomayor seems likely to be confirmed despite her racism and shameless lying about her past statements and beliefs during her hearing. Here&#039;s a round-up of reactions to her first day.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reactions From The Rightosphere To The Sotomayor Hearings&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Unfortunately, with the number of votes the Democrats have, Sonya Sotomayor seems likely to be confirmed despite her racism and shameless lying about her past statements and beliefs during her hearing. Here&#8217;s a round-up of reactions to her first day&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredofit08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745530</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredofit08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745530</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll post this in day 3 when it starts...from the WP...blinky is back at it again today...Cornyn is backing her into a corner and I hope he digs in deeper...she is showing her colors (bad ones)...personally I do not like this woman at all let alone as a judge..I would hate to be in her court for any reason.

&lt;blockquote&gt;When Leahy asked her to explain her controversial remark about the superior judgment of a &quot;wise Latina woman,&quot; she blinked no fewer than 247 times during her answer. When Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) asked her about the same remark, she blinked an additional 146 times. Her overall blink rate, measured in BPM, or blinks per minute, appeared to be between 90 and 100. Sessions asked her about her ruling in the Ricci case on racial preferences. She blinked another 121 times.

Will Supreme Court ethics rules allow her to sign a sponsorship deal with Visine for some product placement on the bench?&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll post this in day 3 when it starts&#8230;from the WP&#8230;blinky is back at it again today&#8230;Cornyn is backing her into a corner and I hope he digs in deeper&#8230;she is showing her colors (bad ones)&#8230;personally I do not like this woman at all let alone as a judge..I would hate to be in her court for any reason.</p>
<blockquote><p>When Leahy asked her to explain her controversial remark about the superior judgment of a &#8220;wise Latina woman,&#8221; she blinked no fewer than 247 times during her answer. When Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) asked her about the same remark, she blinked an additional 146 times. Her overall blink rate, measured in BPM, or blinks per minute, appeared to be between 90 and 100. Sessions asked her about her ruling in the Ricci case on racial preferences. She blinked another 121 times.</p>
<p>Will Supreme Court ethics rules allow her to sign a sponsorship deal with Visine for some product placement on the bench?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Crittenden &#187; Fact Check Fact Check</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745481</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules Crittenden &#187; Fact Check Fact Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745481</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin rounds up the &#8220;ritual assurances.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin rounds up the &#8220;ritual assurances.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Democrats &#187; Sotomayor Attempts to Explain Racist &#8220;Wise Latina&#8221; Remarks &#8230;Update: Dems Misstate Sotomayor&#8217;s Horrid Record</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745473</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Democrats &#187; Sotomayor Attempts to Explain Racist &#8220;Wise Latina&#8221; Remarks &#8230;Update: Dems Misstate Sotomayor&#8217;s Horrid Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745473</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin added this: Soto re-explains her wise Latina comments: It was a ‘bad play on words’ that ‘fell flat.’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin added this: Soto re-explains her wise Latina comments: It was a ‘bad play on words’ that ‘fell flat.’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745472</link>
		<dc:creator>jangar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745472</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;War, the problem is that MOST of the country doesn’t even know who she is.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Even so, Obama won, Democrats hold the majority, and neither care a rats a$$ what America thinks. We can burn up the switchboard on every bill/nomination that reaches he floor, but in the end they will do what they want...until this time next year when the campaigns are in full swing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>War, the problem is that MOST of the country doesn’t even know who she is.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even so, Obama won, Democrats hold the majority, and neither care a rats a$$ what America thinks. We can burn up the switchboard on every bill/nomination that reaches he floor, but in the end they will do what they want&#8230;until this time next year when the campaigns are in full swing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s SCOTUS Hearing, Day 2: Judicial Activism, Ricci v DeStefano, &#38; &#8220;Wise Latina&#8221; Remarks &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745378</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s SCOTUS Hearing, Day 2: Judicial Activism, Ricci v DeStefano, &#38; &#8220;Wise Latina&#8221; Remarks &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745378</guid>
		<description>[...] sends Chris Matthews to leg-thrill heaven and SCOTUS overrules Sotomayor on Ricci Michelle Malkin: Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sends Chris Matthews to leg-thrill heaven and SCOTUS overrules Sotomayor on Ricci Michelle Malkin: Day Two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances and  Sen. Graham to Sotomayor: “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you will be confirmed.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia Sotomayor topless and rule # 5 - rightofcourse.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745351</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia Sotomayor topless and rule # 5 - rightofcourse.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745351</guid>
		<description>[...] doing a decent job of exposing her hypocrisy though.  If you want to read about that, here you go: Michell Malkin: Day two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances, Hot Air: Live stream from Sotomayor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doing a decent job of exposing her hypocrisy though.  If you want to read about that, here you go: Michell Malkin: Day two: Sotomayor and ritual reassurances, Hot Air: Live stream from Sotomayor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745232</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745232</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dude, the Bronx is packed with heat.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know.  I lived there for 4 years.  However much heat there is, me thinks those folks are probably not signing up for the NRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dude, the Bronx is packed with heat.</p></blockquote>
<p>I know.  I lived there for 4 years.  However much heat there is, me thinks those folks are probably not signing up for the NRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtsEdge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745230</link>
		<dc:creator>MtsEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745230</guid>
		<description>Since this is the most recent thread on Sotomayor, may I add that I watched just a GLIMPSE of the &quot;hearings&quot; today.  The part where Graham does most of the talking instead of letting the candidate speak for herself.  Which would have been VERY telling, esp. the part where I thought he was brilliantly (I gave him too much credit) pretending to look for his notes w/the exact quote about the &quot;wise Latina&quot;...then he asked her to repeat the quote for him...then he INTERRUPTED HER when he found his notes!!  What an ijit!!  Reminded me of Christopher Darden w/the infamous glove at the OJ trial, only instead of giving the defendant control of the evidence, Graham WRESTS it away from the defendant, only to DESTROY THE EVIDENCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this is the most recent thread on Sotomayor, may I add that I watched just a GLIMPSE of the &#8220;hearings&#8221; today.  The part where Graham does most of the talking instead of letting the candidate speak for herself.  Which would have been VERY telling, esp. the part where I thought he was brilliantly (I gave him too much credit) pretending to look for his notes w/the exact quote about the &#8220;wise Latina&#8221;&#8230;then he asked her to repeat the quote for him&#8230;then he INTERRUPTED HER when he found his notes!!  What an ijit!!  Reminded me of Christopher Darden w/the infamous glove at the OJ trial, only instead of giving the defendant control of the evidence, Graham WRESTS it away from the defendant, only to DESTROY THE EVIDENCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/comment-page-2/#comment-745224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=30737#comment-745224</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Virtually everyone in the country knows she is lying.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

War, the problem is that MOST of the country doesn&#039;t even know who she is.

One thing that we have to keep in mind is that WE understand...and care profoundly about...many matters that the majority of Americans are blissfully (or dangerously) ignorant of.

We can grouse about that...but I think it means we have a job of education to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Virtually everyone in the country knows she is lying.</p></blockquote>
<p>War, the problem is that MOST of the country doesn&#8217;t even know who she is.</p>
<p>One thing that we have to keep in mind is that WE understand&#8230;and care profoundly about&#8230;many matters that the majority of Americans are blissfully (or dangerously) ignorant of.</p>
<p>We can grouse about that&#8230;but I think it means we have a job of education to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

