Comments on: Roll call vote on Census director: ACORN applauds

By: News for 07/16/2009- Pocket Full of Czars & Treaties, Grassroots for Hire, Other Cluster*ucks « Soldier For Liberty

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:39:36 +0000

By: SENATE VOTES TO CUT OFF ACORN FUNDS | The Right Guy on The Left Coast at Hypocrisy.com

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:24:45 +0000

[...] been named a Census data collection partner for the 2010 Census. Census director Robert Groves, an ACORN-approved Obama nominee, reportedly sent the letter to the ACORN cutting them off because of serious irregularities. [...]

By: ACORN Watch: Census Bureau cuts ties; Update: Census letter added « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:12:37 +0000

[...] director Robert Groves, an ACORN-approved nominee, reportedly sent a letter to the racketeers today in the wake of Big Government’s videotaped [...]

By: Census Bureau Nixes Ties With ACORN « POLITISITE: Politics from the RIGHT Side of the WEB

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:53:53 +0000

[...] director Robert Groves, an ACORN-approved nominee, reportedly sent a letter to the racketeers today in the wake of Big Government’s videotaped [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » ACORN Watch: Census Bureau cuts ties

Michelle Malkin » ACORN Watch: Census Bureau cuts ties — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:26:37 +0000

[...] director Robert Groves, an ACORN-approved nominee, reportedly sent a letter to the racketeers today in the wake of Big Government’s videotaped [...]

By: ACORN Corruption: Report from House Oversight & Goverment Reform Committee Shows “Systemic Fraud” « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:31:24 +0000

[...] Roll call vote on Census director: ACORN applauds A Biden connection: The Amtrak IG scandal Project Vote sues whistleblower: ObamACORN bully tactics exposed “ACORN is a criminal enterprise” Bloomberg hearts ACORN thugs All the news that’s fit to suppress The immortal words of NYTimes chief Bill Keller Voter fraud alert: Houseful of out-of-state Obama activists registered as Ohio voters, received absentee ballots Conyers chickens out of ACORN probe [...]

By: | Track-A-'Crat: The Roll Call of Democratic Delinquency

| Track-A-'Crat: The Roll Call of Democratic Delinquency — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:15:24 +0000

[...] That ACORN fully supports his confirmation. [...]

By: zyzzyg

zyzzyg — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:52:21 +0000

On July 15th, 2009 at 12:38 am, love2rumba said: #70

No worries. Thanks.

By: love2rumba

love2rumba — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:41:37 +0000

Bush did not drop the Microsoft antitrust lawsuit because Gates was a Democrat.

LGM, I'm not thinking of that as much as I am who they vote for and what they support with their money. BTW- I don't recall any evidence that would have compelled Bush or anyone to have dropped the Microsoft v.Sun Microsystems(?) anti-trust lawsuit early-on. If you've got stuff with references, I'm open to suggestion.

By: lgm

lgm — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:35:52 +0000

love2rumba said:

You mean Bill Gates and Family-democrats all-

Bush did not drop the Microsoft antitrust lawsuit because Gates was a Democrat.

By: Living in the PSRK

Living in the PSRK — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:50:14 +0000

I put this together to show WHY you should only minimum data to census folks: Why to only give MINIMAL, LEGALLY REQUIRED data to Census Takers

By: love2rumba

love2rumba — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:38:41 +0000

Why would you think I was aware of this? Or, anything? No matter, the questions are of curiousity, and mostly rhetorical.

Ok, I misread you Zyzzyg. Sorry.

By: zyzzyg

zyzzyg — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:24:55 +0000

On July 14th, 2009 at 10:54 pm, love2rumba said: #67

I thought you were aware of this

Why would you think I was aware of this? Or, anything? No matter, the questions are of curiousity, and mostly rhetorical.

Constitutionaly you are correct. A proper census should only count people. Although, I must admit that in researching a paper in college I found the data useful.

By: zyzzyg

zyzzyg — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:16:57 +0000

On July 14th, 2009 at 9:39 pm, Flyoverman said: #66

zyzzyg,

I agree. And I thought Nixon and Clinton were slimy.

Ummm, OK, but that is a tangent I that I wasn’t expecting.

By: love2rumba

love2rumba — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:54:42 +0000

OK, that was the last census, my question was about this census. Flyoverman offers a better, logical and more reasonable answer in post #57.

Zyzzyg, I was addressing a long-term and insidious trend with Census taking and Census data with a point of consideration that seems to be a trend with Democrtatic Admins beginning from the Clinton Administration forward:

The Democrats, when in control of the whitehouse, have been using the census either to ask invasive questions (e.g. questions along the lines of “how many guns are in your residence?”) during the time the Clinton Administration was engaged in a protracted attempt to seriously destroy the second amendment rights of Americans elsewise -e.g. The Brady Act and the Assault Weapon Ban of 1993-94, or to get people to purposely and fraudulently jigger Census data to support a left-wing point of view on policy issues (e.g ACORN in the present time). I thought you were aware of this

A proper government census should only ask how many people are in your house so as to accurately determine appropriate representation in the House of Representatives. Anything beyond that inivites the use of otherwise private information for the potential purpose of government coersion of specific and various groups of people against their constitutional rights and any religious/political beliefs they may hold.