Al Gore blows more hot air

Jason at Shock and Blog points out Al Gore’s latest gaseous emission:
Michelle,
Heather Ewart, a reporter for the Australian Broadcasting Company, recently interviewed Al Gore.
At one point, she asked Gore about a High Court case in England two years ago about his film “An Inconvenient Truth” being shown to public school students. In that case, the judge ruled that Gore’s film contained nine significant scientific errors, that it “promotes partisan political views,” and that it could not be shown in public schools in England without the teachers providing additional materials to counter the film’s bias. Here is the exchange from the interview:
HEATHER EWART: There was also, though, a British judge who ruled that there were in fact, I think, nine errors when it was challenged in court?
AL GORE: Well, the ruling was in my favour. There have been a number of deniers trying to say that this isn’t real. Of course there are always going to be that, but the overwhelming majority of the scientists who’ve looked at this have said, “We’ve got to confront this.”
He didn’t answer the question posed! He also lied about the outcome of the case in his side-stepping answer. The judge, in fact, came out after the ruling and clearly stated that the claimant/plaintiff (a father of a student) had won the case:
“I conclude that the claimant substantially won this case by virtue of my finding that, but for the new guidance note, the film would have been distributed in breach of sections 406 and 407 of the 1996 Education Act.”
That statement can be found here.
And the court decision can be found here.
There’s no carbon offset big enough to compensate for Al Gore’s mouth.
–Jason
Shock & Blog
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- The latest Al Gore carbon footprint spewed from his mouth | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
- More emissions from Gore « GOP Counter Culture
- Op-Ed Cartoons: Al Gore’s Global Warming Scam « Frugal Café Blog Zone
- Cap-and-Trade Energy Tax Bill… We’re in the Middle of Pretending to Save the Planet, Baby « Frugal Café Blog Zone
- THE GREEN GOPHER! :: YankMcCain.com
- Iran: Pukes With Nukes? — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami
- Don’t let Congress turn 2009 into 1984 – Stop the Global Warming Massive Energy Tax – Senate postpones cap-and-trade! « Jim Blazsik
- Climate models “fundamentally wrong” says new study « Wellsy’s World
- Sarah Palin Makes Bombing Run on Cap and Trade; GOP and Socialist Pundits run for cover « VotingFemale Speaks!
- Poll Results: Do you believe in Global Warming? — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami
- Cap and Trade Shocker: Will Americans Be Forced by Commerce Sec. Gary Locke & Democrats to Pay for China’s Global Warming Emissions? « Frugal Café Blog Zone
- Bigger Than Earth- Bigger Tha Global Warming | Weather
- Sen. Jim Inhofe Asks the $64,000 Question: Why Are We Debating This Meaningless Climate Bill? (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
- Rasmussen Report: American Majority, 72%, Against Obama Controlling Their Light Bulbs « Frugal Café Blog Zone
- NYT Publishes Desperate, Silly Nonsense about Global Warming Hoax: John Kerry Now Claims “Climate Change” Will Threaten National Security « Frugal Café Blog Zone
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Al Gore, Enviro-nitwits
JustOneMinute
» Because He Reads The Wrong Books
Legal Insurrection
» Freedom So Willingly Relinquished

Sister Toldjah
» Today’s House schedule – Do the Dems have 216 votes?
Stop The ACLU
» Democrats Predict Historic House Vote On Health Destruction
Riehl World View
» There's A Big Queer March Going On In DC Today
Riehl World View
» To Stupak Block: They Aren't Pro-Life, And They Aren't Pro-Health












I came across what I think is an elequent analogy by physicist Ron House explaining to the average person:
1. What the alarmist/IPPC ‘hot spot’ model prediction is all about and,
2. Why their failure at hot spot prediction in itself is FAR more damning to them fundamentally in terms of invalidating their claim of AGW more so than say, recent global temperature cooling trends in general or declining ocean heat or increasing ice extent, etc., (ie = huge WAD of empirical evidence running counter to the alarmist fraud)
As he says,
And “The Model” is of course … ALL THEY GOT!