Comments on: No surprise: Lindsay Graham will vote for Sotomayor, says she’s “bold” and “edgy”

By: Michelle Malkin » Kagan Watch: Lindsey Graham acts like…Lindsey Graham

Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:50:31 +0000

[...] Lindsey Graham votes for Sotomayor, praises her “bold” and “edgy” style. Posted in: Supreme Court Printer Friendly comments (5) trackbacks [...]

By: SCOTUS theater: Kagan kabuki « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

SCOTUS theater: Kagan kabuki « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:06:59 +0000

[...] mixed with obsequious suck-uppage, will cast his vote with Kagan and Obama — as he did with Sonia Sotomayor (whom he praised as “bold” and [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » SCOTUS theater: Kagan kabuki

Michelle Malkin » SCOTUS theater: Kagan kabuki — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:04:15 +0000

[...] mixed with obsequious suck-uppage, will cast his vote with Kagan and Obama — as he did with Sonia Sotomayor (whom he praised as “bold” and [...]

By: Virginia Patriot

Virginia Patriot — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:03:30 +0000

Grahamnesty thinks he can do anything he wants, the people of SC reelected him AFTER he called them bigots for wanting the laws enforced.

So, I guess he can.

By: karl9000

karl9000 — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:53:47 +0000

For a pantywaist like Graham, “bold” and “edgy” have real squishy meanings…

By: Fun day at the beach « DaTechguy’s Blog

Fun day at the beach « DaTechguy’s Blog — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:57:19 +0000

[...] and supreme court justices come and go, but real life is always [...]

By: Sean

Sean — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:29:21 +0000

Lindsay Shamnisty has always cared more about the wise latina voters who voted for Obama and will never vote for him no matter how hard is kisses their ass. Lets hope he gets a real primary fight next time he up for re-election.

By: WarEagle82

WarEagle82 — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:58:38 +0000

Got this automated form letter from Graham. He, like all the rest of them, don’t give a DAMN what we think about any given issue.

Of course, I requested a written reply at the web site. I am sure I will get a similarly worded form letter mailed at taxpayer expense.

I’d like to know how anything that has been done so far has helped in any way to further the goals he mentioned in the third paragraph of his is form letter. So far, everything done in this Congress has had the opposite effect.

Thank you for taking the time to contact me. I appreciate the opportunity to hear from you.

Due to the large volume of mail I receive, I regret that I am only able to respond personally to inquiries from South Carolinians.

As we continue our work in the 111th Congress, I look forward to supporting our troops in the War on Terror, repairing our economy and creating jobs, strengthening Social Security, lowering the tax burden on American families, and making the federal government more accountable and efficient.

If your correspondence pertains to a scheduling request, please fax your request to (202) 224-3808.

Sincerely,

Lindsey Graham

By: WarEagle82

WarEagle82 — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:51:39 +0000

CONSERVATIVES will only win elections when CONSERVATIVES voters vote for CONSERVATIVES candidates.

We know which candidates aren’t CONSERVATIVES. Stop voting for them and we will win.

Everybody on this site should go to the link above for Grahamnesty and send him a note to let him know we will be doing what we can to defeat RINOs like him and McCain on the next time around.

Just sent this to Grahamnesty:

Your decision to support a radically left-wing nominee like Judge Sotomayor is indefensible. I am a native-born South Carolinian currently living in Virginia and I will be doing everything I can to encourage a truly conservative candidate to run against you in the next primary in South Carolina.

As long as people like you represent the GOP you will not get a cent or a vote from conservatives like me.

Do the right thing and vote against this socialist, leftist jurist. Do the right thing and vote in the best interested of the good people of South Carolina.

By: Can’t we trade Lindsay Graham for a pack of gum or something? « The Daley Gator

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:18:23 +0000

[...] we trade Lindsay Graham for a pack of gum or something? Damned RINO! He likes his Liberals Bold and Egy huh? Explore posts in the same categories: Judges, [...]

By: orlandocajun

orlandocajun — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:10:58 +0000

On July 22nd, 2009 at 6:03 pm, michele hampton said:

I told you so a couple of weeks ago on this site; Lindsey Graham is a fraud, he needs to be gone when he comes up for re-election!

Sorry Michele but Grahamnesty just got re-elected for six more years in November by the good sheeple of South Carolina. Like the morons in Philly re-elected Murtha, there’s no fixing stupid.

By: symrian

symrian — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:08:38 +0000

Is it just me, or do the words “elections have consequences”, when spoken by Lindsey Graham, sound an awful lot like “How dare you conservative rubes not vote for us and try to hold us to account? We’re going to do things you don’t like even more than we once did”?

As for what to do about Graham, the Official Maverick Lapdog? How about we cost his owner, John McCain, his seat in 2010? It will be fun to watch Graham stare blankly at the walls for four years because his only source of thought and action was removed from the Senate.

By: Dimsdale

Dimsdale — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:03:39 +0000

If Sotomayor is “bold and edgy”, then I guess Graham is limp and wimpy by comparison.

What a gutless, spineless jerk.

By: tiredofit08

tiredofit08 — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:49:07 +0000

you can let the not so good Senator know how you feel via his web site contact form…

http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.EmailSenatorGraham

By: flaming_o

flaming_o — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:43:17 +0000

“Do we want to exclude nominees that are bold? Edgy?”

On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:06 pm, b-cat said:

Hiding his liberalism behind the cloak of meaningless rhetoric.

Meaningless perfectly describes Lindsay Graham’s spew. “Edgy” is a word I’ve never taken a liking to. It’s the most meaningless, vapid, imprecise adjective anyone can apply to anything. It’s linguistic junk. BLECHHH!!!

If this is the best Graham can say about this nominee, double-BLECHHH!!!