Thune concealed carry reciprocity amendment fails

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 22, 2009 12:33 PM

Sen. John Thune sponsored an amendment to the defense authorization bill allowing concealed carry permit holders to carry their weapons across state lines as long as they abided by other states’ CCW rules and regulations.

The Senate just voted down the measure by 58-39, falling two short of the 60-vote threshhold needed to block a filibuster.

Several Democrats voted for the amendment, including Sens. Feingold, Dorgan, Bayh, and Webb.

Sen. Pryor switched his vote from “nay” to “aye” at the last minute.

GOP Sens. Lugar and Voinovich voted “nay.”

Posted in: Guns

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Senate votes down concealed weapons measure | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  2. BizzyBlog
  3. What I’m Politicing: Pres. Obama Wants to “Ban” Guns? « Fastidious

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #750906
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:35 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Don’t leave home without it!

  2. #750907
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, Socky said:

    The NRA thanks the DNC in advance for the resulting donations.

  3. #750908
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    “How’re we gonna shoot golf without guns?”
    - Curly (THREE LITTLE BEERS, 1935)

  4. #750912
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, b-cat said:

    Don’t we have a Constitutional Right, God-given, to keep and bear arms? Where in our Founding Documents does it state except where prohibited by law?

  5. #750913
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    “Did anyone ever point a gun at you?” “Yeah, but he couldn’t shoot me.” “How come?” “I had my finger in the barrel!”
    - Gene Roth & Larry (SLAPHAPPY SLEUTHS, 1950)

  6. #750927
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    What’s with all of the annoying Three Stooges quotes in every thread today?

  7. #750935
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:47 pm, tre said:

    Just offer it again, and again, and again. Until it does pass.

    I’m just glad to see some Republicans going on offense instead of staying on defense.

  8. #750936
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:48 pm, J S Ragman said:

    I called both Webb’s and Warner’s offices yesterday afternoon. One out of two ain’t bad, but two out of two would have been better.

  9. #750937
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:48 pm, right_on said:

    Thune concealed carry reciprocity amendment fails

    Well of course it does….duh!

  10. #750940
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, tre said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, Rogue Cheddar

    Spread Out!
    *Whack!*
    Nyuck! Nyuck! Nyuck!

  11. #750943
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, b-cat said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:48 pm, J S Ragman said:
    I called both Webb’s and Warner’s offices yesterday afternoon. One out of two ain’t bad, but two out of two would have been better.

    This means that Warner MUST go.

  12. #750944
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, inspiredhome said:

    Shouldn’t it be up to the states anyway?

  13. #750947
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm, inspiredhome said:
    Shouldn’t it be up to the states anyway?

    Not if they violate the Bill of Rights.

  14. #750952
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm, John424 said:

    Hmmm . . .

    While it’s not universal, most states with CCW laws on the books already excercise reciprocity with other states that have CCW laws.

    I guess instead of a federal law on this, I’d like to see people put the pressure on their state goobermints to enact full reciprocity with ALL states. Keep the federal goobermint out of the picture on this.

    Frankly any federal goobermint involvement in firearms laws outside of what is stated in the 2nd amendment is, to me, something to be avoided. The feds should do nothing more than see to it that our right to keep and bear arms isn’t infringed on by state or local laws. Other than that, stay the heck out of it.

    Just my 2 copper’s worth.

  15. #750953
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm, rw said:

    Is this really a conservative position, other than that it involves firearms? I don’t believe that anyone on either side is taking a principled stand on this. If the vote were about gay marriage, I would expect the vote to flip and would not expect Schumer to issue a similar statement.

    He said in a statement that “to gut the ability of individual states to determine who should be able to carry a concealed weapon marry makes no sense,” he said.

  16. #750959
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, right_on said:

    Maybe a “gun rights” Democrat (yes, I know…a contradiction in terms!) could pull a Pelosi/Waxman, and slip in an amendment in an unrelated bill? You know, an “in the dark of night” moment, and have stealth passage? (They’ve admitted they don’t read the bills, right?)

    Nah…that’s crazy talk! That kind of action might help protect American freedom, and we can’t have any of that!

  17. #750967
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:01 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:
    What’s with all of the annoying Three Stooges quotes in every thread today?

    “Huck mir nisht a chynick, and I don’t mean efsher!”
    - Larry (MUTTS TO YOU, 1938)

  18. #750975
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:07 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm, rw said:
    Is this really a conservative position, other than that it involves firearms? I don’t believe that anyone on either side is taking a principled stand on this. If the vote were about gay marriage, I would expect the vote to flip and would not expect Schumer to issue a similar statement.

    He said in a statement that “to gut the ability of individual states to determine who should be able to carry a concealed weapon marry makes no sense,” he said.

    Apples and oranges. There is nothing in the Constitution which guarantees the right to homosexual marriage, however the right to bear arms is explicit, and shall not be infringed upon.

  19. #750976
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:07 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    If the vote were about gay marriage, I would expect the vote to flip and would not expect Schumer to issue a similar statement.

    I disagree. There is an enumerated right to keep and bear arms in the Constitution. There is no Federal right to marry, unless 5 justices smell a right from the emanations of penumbra of several parts of the Constitution… perhaps in “free association”, but that’s reaching.

  20. #750980
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:08 pm, right_on said:

    This means that Warner MUST go.

    I plan to support “Up and Out!” I am spreading the word in my community to get support for the idea.

    For those of you who haven’t heard about it, it’s pretty simple;

    When any elected official’s term is “up,” they should be voted “OUT!” This should apply to local, state, and federal representatives, regardless of party affiliation.

    These selfish politicians who have enriched themselves and their families on the backs of the taxpayers MUST go. No if’s, and’s, or but’s!

    They are destroying America, and we keep electing them back into office. Enough is enough!

  21. #750988
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:13 pm, southsideironworks said:

    I purchased a 5-year NRA membership in January. I would like to take this opportunity and thank the Dems for sparking my interest in firearms.

  22. #750990
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:16 pm, Dan Lee said:

    This is actually a good thing. If you violate a states 10th amendment right by imposing reciprocity on them, you can also make a case to violate the tenth amendment in other places. The Feds already have too much unjustified/unconstitutional influence over the states. We have to be consistent. To tell the Feds to get out of the way of our States Right selectively, would set a dangerous precedent. THAT is why so many Democrats actually wanted this.. Now you know..

  23. #750995
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:18 pm, inspiredhome said:

    Re: atheling

    Whoops! I knew that! I’m just tired of the federal government trampling over states rights.

  24. #751000
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:20 pm, 24Klady said:

    southsideironworks
    I have given NRA memberships to family members (when NRA has offered discounts) just to bump the membership totals. They loved them, especially the choice of magazines. Some didn’t own a firearm then, but have since purchased one and going thrugh the drill of classes.

  25. #751007
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:22 pm, 24Klady said:

    Dan, I thought the same thing…it’s a good thing. Once the feds get involved in any thing they can also pull a 180 & take back more than the original intent of the law.

  26. #751021
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    here’s the vote
    Vote Counts: YEAs 58
    NAYs 39
    Not Voting 3

    Alphabetical by Senator Name
    Akaka (D-HI), Nay
    Alexander (R-TN), Yea
    Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
    Baucus (D-MT), Yea
    Bayh (D-IN), Yea
    Begich (D-AK), Yea
    Bennet (D-CO), Yea
    Bennett (R-UT), Yea
    Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
    Bond (R-MO), Yea
    Boxer (D-CA), Nay
    Brown (D-OH), Nay
    Brownback (R-KS), Yea
    Bunning (R-KY), Yea
    Burr (R-NC), Yea
    Burris (D-IL), Nay
    Byrd (D-WV), Not Voting
    Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
    Cardin (D-MD), Nay
    Carper (D-DE), Nay
    Casey (D-PA), Yea
    Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
    Coburn (R-OK), Yea
    Cochran (R-MS), Yea
    Collins (R-ME), Yea
    Conrad (D-ND), Yea
    Corker (R-TN), Yea
    Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
    Crapo (R-ID), Yea
    DeMint (R-SC), Yea
    Dodd (D-CT), Nay
    Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
    Durbin (D-IL), Nay
    Ensign (R-NV), Yea
    Enzi (R-WY), Yea
    Feingold (D-WI), Yea
    Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
    Franken (D-MN), Nay
    Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
    Graham (R-SC), Yea
    Grassley (R-IA), Yea
    Gregg (R-NH), Yea
    Hagan (D-NC), Yea
    Harkin (D-IA), Nay
    Hatch (R-UT), Yea
    Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
    Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
    Inouye (D-HI), Nay
    Isakson (R-GA), Yea
    Johanns (R-NE), Yea
    Johnson (D-SD), Yea
    Kaufman (D-DE), Nay
    Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting
    Kerry (D-MA), Nay
    Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
    Kohl (D-WI), Nay
    Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
    Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
    Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
    Leahy (D-VT), Nay
    Levin (D-MI), Nay
    Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay
    Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
    Lugar (R-IN), Nay
    Martinez (R-FL), Yea
    McCain (R-AZ), Yea
    McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
    McConnell (R-KY), Yea
    Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
    Merkley (D-OR), Nay
    Mikulski (D-MD), Not Voting
    Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
    Murray (D-WA), Nay
    Nelson (D-FL), Nay
    Nelson (D-NE), Yea
    Pryor (D-AR), Yea
    Reed (D-RI), Nay
    Reid (D-NV), Yea
    Risch (R-ID), Yea
    Roberts (R-KS), Yea
    Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
    Sanders (I-VT), Nay
    Schumer (D-NY), Nay
    Sessions (R-AL), Yea
    Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
    Shelby (R-AL), Yea
    Snowe (R-ME), Yea
    Specter (D-PA), Nay
    Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
    Tester (D-MT), Yea
    Thune (R-SD), Yea
    Udall (D-CO), Yea
    Udall (D-NM), Yea
    Vitter (R-LA), Yea
    Voinovich (R-OH), Nay
    Warner (D-VA), Yea
    Webb (D-VA), Yea
    Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
    Wicker (R-MS), Yea
    Wyden (D-OR), Nay

  27. #751022
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:31 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:
  28. #751052
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:49 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:01 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    “Huck mir nisht a chynick, and I don’t mean efsher!”
    - Larry (MUTTS TO YOU, 1938)

    Gai kaken oifen yam!

  29. #751059
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Ron said:

    I think this was a bad idea, and I have a CCW. I don’t want the federal government telling the states what they have to do about regulating guns. If its fair for them to say you have to abide by one state’s laws, across all borders, then they can just as easily turn around and ban concealed carry altogether. I’m for states’ rights.

  30. #751066
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 1:58 pm, Ron said:

    And yes, states do regulate their own reciprocity. Not all play fair, but many do.

  31. #751073
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:02 pm, txvet2 said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    What’s with all of the annoying Three Stooges quotes in every thread today?

    It’s the M/M equivalent of spam or telemarketing. Incredibly annoying, but you can’t do much about it.

  32. #751081
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:
    What’s with all of the annoying Three Stooges quotes in every thread today?

    I wonder the same thing. But it’s not just today. Rogue does it all the time. Instead of taking time to actually give an opinion or debate, Rogue resorts to annoying stooges comments. Really really dumb. I wonder if Rogue has any opinions. If that is all that poster can contribute, he should just be kicked out. It is a waste of time to read those posts!!

  33. #751096
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:20 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Oh, but he’s his own thinker! He voted 3rd party!

  34. #751102
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:24 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:20 pm, atheling said:
    Oh, but he’s his own thinker! He voted 3rd party!

    Ha! So, he is one of those who helped get Obama elected. Great.

  35. #751107
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:25 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Ron said: If its fair for them to say you have to abide by one state’s laws, across all borders, then they can just as easily turn around and ban concealed carry altogether.

    Yeah but.. the 2nd Amendment states directly “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”.

    Couple that with Article 4, Section 2 “State Obligations”, Clause 1 “Comity Clause” :

    The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

    I can’t envision how they could ‘turn it around’ against us especially now that the SCOTUS recently ruled in Heller that defending yourself with a gun is a basic Constitutional right? Following Heller, it seems that the Thune bill really represents the next domino that must ultimately fall – to the chagrin of anti gun libtards everywhere.

  36. #751108
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:26 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:02 pm, txvet2 said:
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    What’s with all of the annoying Three Stooges quotes in every thread today?
    It’s the M/M equivalent of spam or telemarketing. Incredibly annoying, but you can’t do much about it.

    The three stooges quotes are in honor of the current administration. I post them because I find that they are in many ways apropo to the topic at hand. Myself and others like them. I’m sorry you either don’t like or understand them, but then, it’s a guy thing.

  37. #751114
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:30 pm, ccmcgee said:

    Ron and Dan, I think that you are missing an important point here. The Constitution guarantees the right to keep and bear arms. This is a right of every citizen. The states, nor the Federal government have any right to make laws restricting that right, period. There would be no 10th amendment infringement since the right is guaranteed by the constitution which trumps states rights. The Federal governments function in this case is to protect the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. Simple! Except both the federal government and the states have endeavored to strip and/or regulate that right away from the people.
    This amendment would simply have been a step in the right direction, whereby the Federal government steps up to protect a constitutionally guaranteed right. Our Constitutional rights are not determined by the boundaries of states or their laws, just as the federal government cannot make laws that and infringe on the states in areas not specifically given it in the constitution. There is a lot of infringement by both the states and the feds when it comes to our rights as We The People.

  38. #751117
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:31 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:30 pm, ccmcgee said:

    Well said.

  39. #751118
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:24 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Ha! So, he is one of those who helped get Obama elected. Great.

    No, the moronic GOP helped Obama get elected. I blame you and the rest of the wishy washy moderates who can’t think for themseleves but must vote for the party.

  40. #751120
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Concerning the Three Stooges and Obama’s administration, okay, liberals are kinda funny when they are not in power. But when they’re in power they are not funny – they are dangerous.

  41. #751137
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:52 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:
    Concerning the Three Stooges and Obama’s administration, okay, liberals are kinda funny when they are not in power. But when they’re in power they are not funny – they are dangerous.

    tru dat, but when you laugh at them, and they should be laughed at, you disempower them.

  42. #751140
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:54 pm, raybury said:

    I was amenable to a federalist argument against this amendment, but there isn’t one. Yes, some states could be too lax with CCW, just as they could be with drivers’ licensing. And as this applies to only resident permits, it is not as if criminals who reside in a state can just get a CCW from somewhere else.

    So now I will remain defenseless when I cross over into Maryland, which doesn’t have CCW reciprocity with Virginia. As a result I will continue to cross rarely.

  43. #751154
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:12 pm, CleanGuy said:

    Man! Mid-term elections cannot happen soon enough.

  44. #751160
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:14 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    I own property in 2 states and regularly call all 4 senators offices and let them know my opinions.

    They all 4 voted correctly, yea.

    This should be the law of the land, clearly more work is needed.

  45. #751161
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:14 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    No, the moronic GOP helped Obama get elected. I blame you and the rest of the wishy washy moderates who can’t think for themseleves but must vote for the party.

    Said the moron who quotes the Three Stooges and can’t spell.

  46. #751164
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:16 pm, atheling said:

    What if a state violated the 19th Amendment by not allowing white men to vote? If the Feds overruled that, re-establishing the 19th, would you take the side of that state?

  47. #751179
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:27 pm, txvet2 said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 2:26 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I haven’t anything against the Three Stooges – I used to enjoy them quite a bit too before I grew up, and some quotes are apropos. 8-10 in every thread gets to be tedious.

  48. #751181
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:28 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:16 pm, atheling said:
    What if a state violated the 19th Amendment by not allowing white men to vote? If the Feds overruled that, re-establishing the 19th, would you take the side of that state?

    The States are sovereign except where they trample constitutional law, as the Supreme Court has had to overturn state laws in the past. One would hope one would side with the Constitution.

    How’s that for a moron? Did I spell everything correctly?

  49. #751188
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:30 pm, atheling said:

    Well at least you didn’t quote the Three Stooges this time.

  50. #751192
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:31 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:30 pm, atheling said:
    Well at least you didn’t quote the Three Stooges this time.

    See other thread, happyscrapper told me not to.

  51. #751193
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:32 pm, tanksoldier said:

    The States are sovereign except where they trample constitutional law, as the Supreme Court has had to overturn state laws in the past.

    What about “full faith and credit”?

    I can’t believe both senators from VT voted against this. It doesn’t even affect their state. Anybody can go there and carry already with no permit at all.

  52. #751204
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:39 pm, txvet2 said:

    In effect, you already have a legal right to carry concealed weapons across state lines in most cases – only a few states do not recognize Texas concealed carry permits, for instance. I used to travel back and forth across the country quite often. I generally carried my handgun under the seat, and I just made it a point not to get stopped in those states with recip agreements (or if I did, I didn’t act like I was guilty of something). I’ve never had my car searched for contraband of any kind, except at the Mexican border (but that’s another story).

  53. #751218
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:49 pm, iamsaved said:

    I sure don’t understand why places like Chicago, New York City, and Washington, DC, all having very strong gun control, have so much crime where firearms are used. If it’s illegal for people to have concealed pistols in those cities, even with a CCW, there should be very little crime where firearms are involved.

    And what about Seung-Hui Cho shooting all those people at Virgina Tech-That campus had a complete ban on weapons. If he would have just obeyed the law, there wouldn’t have been any shooting. /sarc

    When will these liberals get the idea that they are only disarming law abiding citizens?

    How often is a policeman at the scene of a crime while it’s happening? I’m sorry, but most criminals won’t wait around while you call 911.

    BTW, there is no reciprocity for CCW in the North East – or if so, very little. May as well not carry if you head that way. Thune’s amendment would have let people with CCWs from other states carry while visiting or traversing across the state.

  54. #751228
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 3:52 pm, cubbiegal said:

    I so %^&*($! hate living in ILL-ANNOYZ.
    Did I mention that I hate Illinois.
    Just checking.

  55. #751244
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:06 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    I have a ccw from SC. I had to take a 8 hr. class and have a shooting score to pass the course. I work in GA where you can go to the kmart and get a CCW. GA and SC do Not recognize their respective CCW laws. Therefore I had to get a New Hampshire out of state CCW permit to be able to carry in GA. Figure that one out.

  56. #751248
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Dear Iamsaved,

    you are very naive! Criminals will always get the guns even in a very gun controlled atmosphere. Its a perfect situation for them because the citizens are unarmed. Do you think that a policy or sign banning guns is going to keep someone from murdering innocents? Guns don’t kill people, people kill people!

  57. #751249
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Never forget that once an unarmed person is atacked and robbed, or worse, they generally begin screaming for tougher laws, more government intervention.

    The person who already has his/her own personal protection does not.

    Think about that.

  58. #751252
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:13 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Also the police do nothing to prevent crime. They usually show up after the bodies hit the floor. The Police will not save you. Only you can be responsible for your own safety. In this world today you are asking for it if you are not armed someway!

  59. #751256
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:17 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    For the record I carry, I shoot, am a life member of the NRA, retired veteran, love the environment, and am getting my soon to be teenage, next month, daughter her life membership to the NRA.

    Plus she and I are planning a thru-hike of the Appalachian trail next summer.

    I love the national park system, I love hiking, I love my family. I intend to always protect them all.

  60. #751269
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    My driver’s license is good in all 50 states of the Union and the District of Columbia. I see no reason why my concealed handgun license should not be.

    ECS

  61. #751275
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:33 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:
    My driver’s license is good in all 50 states of the Union and the District of Columbia. I see no reason why my concealed handgun license should not be.

    ECS

    Amen! And driving is not a right! It’s a privelege, while the right to carry is exactly that: a right.

  62. #751276
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 pm, atheling said:

    Argh! Privilege!

  63. #751290
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:52 pm, taggart said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 pm, atheling said:
    Argh! Privilege!

    Said the guy who calls people morons for not spelling correctly. And Rogue, I love the quotes! Keep ‘em up!

  64. #751296
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 5:04 pm, J S Ragman said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Dear Iamsaved,

    Uh, kill the motor, dude. I think the first two paragraphs of his post were sarcasm.

  65. #751307
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 5:12 pm, atheling said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:52 pm, taggart said:
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 pm, atheling said:
    Argh! Privilege!
    Said the guy who calls people morons for not spelling correctly. And Rogue, I love the quotes! Keep ‘em up!

    At least I know when I spell something wrong. And “privilege” is not as easy as “themselves”.

    It’s a girl, btw, not a guy.

  66. #751515
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 9:14 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Yeah, you can’t trust those wascaly FBI cleared citizens exercising their Constitutional rights.

    You can bet the law will stop gun runner in their tracks!

  67. #751520
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:52 pm, taggart said:
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 pm, atheling said:
    Argh! Privilege!
    Said the guy who calls people morons for not spelling correctly. And Rogue, I love the quotes! Keep ‘em up!

    Thank you for your support taggart,I am glad you enjoyed them, however, my little bit of whimsy with the 3 Stooges quotes apparently has set off the tolerant class somehow. It is not my aim to overtly provoke, so I will table the Stooges for a while and find other ways to make my points, hopefully with humor, as humor may be our only salvation with regards to the current administration. Cheers.

  68. #751536
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 9:31 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 22nd, 2009 at 5:12 pm, atheling said:
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:52 pm, taggart said:
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 pm, atheling said:
    Argh! Privilege!
    Said the guy who calls people morons for not spelling correctly. And Rogue, I love the quotes! Keep ‘em up!
    At least I know when I spell something wrong. And “privilege” is not as easy as “themselves”.

    It’s a girl, btw, not a guy.

    I’ll give you that the word privilege is more diffcult to spell than the word themselves, however, I confess only to missing my typo, as I do indeed know how to spell, and endeavor to make an effort when spelling. But, it is gratifying to know that spelling and grammar nazis on this blog are everready to point out the error of my ways.

    Congratz on “It’s a girl, btw, not a guy.”, I didn’t even know you were pregnant! You hardly showed! :lol:

  69. #751538
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 9:37 pm, jangar said:

    Sen. Pryor switched his vote from “nay” to “aye” at the last minute.

    Proof that he’s not paying attention to his roots…but to the party.

    Uhhh…democrat?

  70. #751554
    On July 22nd, 2009 at 10:20 pm, Dan Lee said:

    For those who used drivers licenses as an example. It’s not because the federal government says that the states had to give reciprocity on drivers licenses. It is because they agreed on it.

    My Firearms association founder is a constitutional attorney specializing in firearms & the second amendment. If he says screwing with the 10th amendment would be bad in this case, then I’m sorry, but I’m going to take his opinion over anyone here. No offense meant to anyone. After all, it’s because of him that the state of Tennessee finally loosened it’s tyrannical gun laws.

  71. #755147
    On July 26th, 2009 at 9:57 am, Mark Jaquith said:

    This is the wrong way to do it. Don’t force reciprocity. Force states to abolish their illegal anti-open-carry laws. The Constitution gives me the right to carry a gun—any state that denies me that is violating my rights. I’m willing to concede on concealed carry. There’s nothing in the Constitution about having the right to conceal a weapon. Indeed, “bear arms” implies open carrying. Open carry without a permit is illegal in many states.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Self-defense story of the day

May 5, 2009 08:59 PM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Another shooting spree that’s all your fault

April 4, 2009 07:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Conviction.

Who’s responsible for the New York rampage?

April 4, 2009 10:29 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 21 Trackbacks

Witch hunt.

Is Obama starving federal firearms program for pilots?

March 17, 2009 11:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Homeland insecurity alert.

Targeting law-abiding gun owners again

November 11, 2008 11:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Caution: Ignorant, gun-hating MSM at work

October 9, 2008 10:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

268 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Misfire.


Categories: Guns



JustOneMinute

» An Inconvenient Hack
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook