E-mails of the day

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 28, 2009 12:01 AM

My appearance on FNC’s Hannity show last night (vid at Hot Air) to talk about Culture of Corruption prompted many bitter e-mails from Obama-bots, but this one takes the cake:

from Del Hughes delhughes@suddenlink.net
to writemalkin@gmail.com
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:42 PM
subject Book
mailed-by suddenlink.net

How do you, an Oriental, get on national TV and say and write such hard things about the President and several of his staff without being sued for slander? If you wrote about me like you have written about all these other people, I would sue you for slander in heartbeat.

“Orientals” on TV! Appalling!

Guess what? Del Hughes was not alone in his/her dismay over a brown-skinned critic of Obama on the TV.

Look:

from barou yoplo yoplo54@yahoo.com
to writemalkin@gmail.com
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:27 PM
subject Don’t Forget Where You Coming From
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com

Miss,

I follow your steps since the election and apparently you forgot where you coming from.

I will be glad to have a debate with about your book, your vision, and you being an Asian who forgot where she is coming from.

You and your friends are not in a good position to judge anyone, nor having the right to assume someone is corrupted without a concrete proof. So be careful for what you wish for.

And here’s yet another race-based missive that landed in the in-box tonight. This one earns special recognition for creative spelling:

from Chatora8@aol.com
to writemalkin@gmail.com
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:43 PM
subject (no subject)
mailed-by aol.com

Michelle Malkin you are a stupid asian BITCH.The only reason you are on t.v is because americans feel so so sorry for you.

It is obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about.

So go and sell your body some more.

So that you can send money back home to support your slummish asian family.

Michelle A.K.A undercover HORE.

Hey, so much for post-racial America! Why don’t we all just have a beer and stop racial profiling, hmmm?

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:49 am, heathermichelle said:

    *headdesk*

    Seriously? I mean…seriously?!?

    So, I’m confused. MM is “Oriental” and therefore should be a liberal. I’m blonde and blue-eyed (pretty opposite side of the spectrum), so does that mean I should be conservative? But I’m a woman, so I should be a liberal. But I live in the Midwest, so shouldn’t I be a bitter clinger? But I’m 25 (therefore of the ‘young’ and ‘enlightened’ generation), so I should definitely be a liberal.

    Oh, silly Leftists and their labels.

    Keep up the good fight Michelle.

  2. #102
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:50 am, zeroangel said:

    jangar:

    Especially when zero comes a callin’.

    Moi?

  3. #103
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:52 am, jangar said:

    Moi?

    Mornin’ sunshine…how’s junior?

  4. #104
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:53 am, zeroangel said:

    jangar:

    He’s fine, thank you for asking. Behaving much like you would expect an infant primate to behave. He poops, cries, eats. Occasionally smiles, which is really cute.

  5. #105
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:54 am, reshas1 said:

    Oh OH OH They say Republican’s are such hate mongers, racist..
    I’ve said all along it’s the Dem’s. My husband is a black Republican and you should see the crap he gets. HE says the Dem’s are racist and want blacks under their thumb.
    One thing about having O as president, all the hate and racism will be glaring from the left.

  6. #106
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:56 am, reshas1 said:

    This is a good read.. Read it and weep Dem’s.

    Chris Charles: Race(ing) for Votes: Part I
    Posted by chris@conservativenationalist.com on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:00:00 AM

    Preface

    Conservatism stands for liberty and justice for all Americans. Conservatives believe in individual freedom. Conservatives do not force oppressive legislation upon citizens. Conservatism fights for the rights of all Americans to keep more of their hard earned money. Conservatism seeks to defend this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. So, why do Democrats overwhelmingly win the minority vote? Do minorities not believe in these things? I think they do, so it must be something else that is at play here…

    Part I: A Brief History of the GOP

    Slavery was the greatest mistake this country ever made, and liberals are quick to point that fact out to people that love America. They love to call this a ‘racist nation’ that was built on the backs of slaves. These America haters fail to mention that it was conservatives who opposed slavery; it was a Republican President that signed the Emancipation Proclamation. It was conservatives and Republicans that fought for the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which abolished slavery once and for all. They forget that it was conservatives that passed the 14th and 15th Amendments that granted equal protection and voting rights to all citizens, regardless of color. They also don’t mention that the first blacks in Congress were Republicans all the way back in the 1860’s. It wasn’t until 1934 that Democrats elected a black man to the US House of Representatives. The GOP had the fortitude of character to do what was right, even though to do nothing would have been much easier.

    Anti-slavery conservatives were fought tooth and nail by the Democratic Party. The Democrats actively supported slavery; they opposed the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the US Constitution. In fact, supporting slavery was their overriding agenda at the time.

    That was a long time ago though; we shouldn’t judge the Dems on what their political ancestors did nearly 150 years ago, that would be unfair. We all make mistakes and we should all be forgiven as long as we admit our mistakes and take corrective action.

    What’s that? You mean to tell me that the DNC spent the next 100 years trying to hold black people down? I don’t believe it!

    Yes. The party of inclusion and diversity is really the party of exclusion and persecution. The party of Al Sharpton is the party of Jim Crow. The Party of the NAACP is also the party of the Ku Klux Klan.

    After Republicans defeated slavery and passed the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, the Democratic Party went from a pro-slavery platform to an anti-black platform. For more than 100 years, the DNC fought to institutionalize racism in the form of Jim Crow laws, and other segregationist legislation. The Democratic Party and its supporters are the reason that blacks were treated as second class citizens until the late 1960’s. The founding fathers didn’t say that Rosa Parks had to sit in the back of the bus; Democrats did.

    Ok, ok, so the Democrats were a little late to recognize that black people should be afforded the inalienable rights guaranteed by our Creator and our Constitution but they supported the civil rights movement of the 1960’s right?

    Oh sorry, wrong again! Even 100 years after the Republicans ended slavery, (no thanks to Democrats) 80% of those that opposed the civil rights act of 1964 were Democrats. In stark contrast, more than 80% of GOP Congressman supported the legislation. (1)

    Given this long and sad record of being on the wrong side of history, you might expect that the Democratic Party would admit their mistakes and beg Americans (especially black Americans) for forgiveness.

    Not a chance!

    Instead the DNC simply declared that it was the party of minorities. It became their platform to use minority groups to win elections by insisting that they would fight for them. They insisted that this country was so darn racist that the only way they could be equal, really equal, was to take government handouts. They said that blacks needed help (a lot of help) if they were to be successful in this racist nation. The Democratic Party is the reason racism was so entrenched in our society, for so long.

    Over the years the Democratic Party has really changed. In the past, the Dems wanted to take everything from blacks: freedom, land, rights. Now the opposite is true, the DNC wants to give everything to blacks: jobs, housing, health care, ‘extra protections’, money, affirmative action, quotas, and so on.

    Somehow, over the last 50 years, too many blacks have bought into this notion that the Democratic Party is the party that fights for blacks. The truth is the DNC is still keeping blacks subjugated with the subtle racism of lower expectations. The Dems have substituted overt racism with a quieter form that claims to advance the standing of blacks in society but really the hand of big brother is holding black people back, keeping them from being truly free. Democrats now celebrate anytime a person of color achieves a position of high standing because that person is a minority. Conservatives celebrate all Americans that are successful regardless of color, creed, or anything else for that matter.

  7. #107
    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:57 am, jangar said:

    Zero:

    Yep, they’re fun. I did it twice.

  8. #108
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:00 am, reshas1 said:

    And a Canadian wrote in to Oreilly yesterday, we don’t call them African Canadians or Italian Candians, we are just Canadians.. SO TRUE..

  9. #109
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:04 am, zeroangel said:

    Monster thread is still alive folks even though it’s off the front page.

    40 more till 2000! Let’s do this!

    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/23/the-dont-taze-me-bro-moment-of-henry-louis-gates/comment-page-20/#comment-757167

  10. #110
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:05 am, Misscheryl said:

    One common thread I’ve seen throughout the communications from liberals and these hateful comments mirror my feelings, (Barbara Boxer pulled this stunt for the world to see), is that they appear to be all about “popularity” and peer pressure. This adolescent behavior that whatever is “kewl,” whatever the “crowd” is doing is what you should be thinking and doing. Boxer threw the NAACP at the black executive as though something is wrong with this man because fellow African American’s opposed his opinions. They also try to pit one group of conservatives against another as though if you deviate at all from what the majority think, something is less than perfect about you. It’s pubescent thuggary but I guess that’s why they are labeled “sheep.”

  11. #111
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:06 am, reshas1 said:

    Del Hughes

    Grant Carey Operations Mgr grantcarey@crainmedia.com
    Don Mcritchie News Director news@crainmedia.com
    Heath Shelby Program Director heathshelby@crainmedia.com
    Cindy Jackson Production Manager production@crainmedia.com

  12. #112
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:06 am, Laree said:

    Michelle,

    Honestly how much commenting do you get that is from outside the U.S.? I have a theory that a lot of the trolling, and comments I read on Conservative blogs are actually from non Americans. I mean on the Internet there are no fences.

  13. #113
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:12 am, max said:

    you were awesome on Hannity…
    and with the hole world watching!

  14. #114
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:12 am, 24Klady said:

    The idiotic comments sent to Michelle were clearly racist. Worse, they clearly do support restriction of free speech. Worse still, I’ve never heard Mrs. Malkin refer to herself in an interview as asian, a woman, or mother. She is a very intelligent conservative writer. Period.

    The only thing liberals know how to do well is tear down and destroy anything they disagree with, take from others to support programs that will never encourage them to do better, and give excuses to those that carry their race or ethnic card as their only badge of honor.

  15. #115
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:13 am, jangar said:

    I have a theory that a lot of the trolling, and comments I read on Conservative blogs are actually from non Americans.

    Like Illegal-Americans? ;)

  16. #116
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:15 am, jangar said:

    max said:

    and with the hole world watching!

    Hole World - that dark, underbelly side of our world.

  17. #117
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:18 am, MTConservative said:

    Thanks, Michelle, for all the hard work and heavy lifting you do. You have a loyal following, and I am proud to call myself part of it. I am looking forward to reading your book.

    All the best to you.

  18. #118
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:21 am, Misscheryl said:

    Ditto what has already been said. It takes a lot of courage to do what you do Michelle and please know that the sacrifice is appreciated.

  19. #119
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:21 am, Laree said:

    My husband is of Korean and Spanish descent. I keep telling him to use Asian, but he uses Oriental too, but he does get it. He uses Asian Pacific on official forms that require ethnic identity like the Military calls for….he had to use “Other” a lot, he got teased by the black people in his unit…Sgt L**** you’re just an “Other” Too Funny. How come we all get along in the military but this stuff – like the above emails is rampant in the civilian quarter? 27 year retired veteran who doesn’t care what you call him, he calls himself AMERICAN.

    The MSM really likes to ramp up the racial hypersensitivity for ratings (GATES/GATE) and by the looks of Michelle’s “mail” it works on the weak minded.

  20. #120
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:24 am, Laree said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:13 am, jangar said:

    I have a theory that a lot of the trolling, and comments I read on Conservative blogs are actually from non Americans.

    Like Illegal-Americans? ;)

    Some of it looked like stilted broken English, it didn’t look like someone with a firm grasp of how we Americans use the English language or abuse it your choice :)

  21. #121
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:26 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    How come we all get along in the military but this stuff – like the above emails is rampant in the civilian quarter?

    I don’t know if it’s really rampant. Honestly, you can’t use these hate mails as representative of “civilians” as a whole or even “liberals.” Race is still an issue with the military, though less so, I think because of the necessity to build unit-cohesiveness.

    Someone like MM is going to attract some lunatics. That’s all.

  22. #122
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:26 am, maisy said:

    Michele, You looked your usual beautiful self on Fox this morning….BUT I wouldn’t even bother with these nutcases…Your time is far too valuable. They’ll always be out there…and I do mean “out there”

  23. #123
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:27 am, granite said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:12 am, 24Klady said:

    The only thing liberalssocialists know how to do well….

    As I said above…parasites.

  24. #124
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:33 am, happyscrapper said:

    My post just disappeared. I didn’t say anything wrong, I’m sure of it. I will try again. If it wasn’t for the left wing race-baiters, MLK,Jr’s “dream” of a colorblind society would have come true a long time ago. The Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons in this country have caused racial tension to go on long after it should have all become a dirty spot in our history. And they really don’t see that.

  25. #125
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:34 am, GraniteMan said:

    Why oh why are Dems labeled champions of racial diversity, a party that includes people of all races when they attack a political opposite with only racial slurs? Not once did they mention Michelle’s political position. They do the same with Sarah. Clarence Thomas another one hated by the left, Condi Rice and on and on. The repubs do welcome all as individuals who love their country and not as groups of people with axes to grind.

  26. #126
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:35 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    You’re straying too far from the plantation Michelle! Your liberal liberators expect fawning appreciation from the inferior races once “freed”. Don’t you know your place? Don’t go getting all uppity on us girl! Freedom of speech and equality are nice but…. Orientals on TV!?!?! Yikes!

  27. #127
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:37 am, Laree said:

    zeroangel

    Race is still an issue with the military, though less so, I think because of the necessity to build unit-cohesiveness.

    Race is still an issue NO it’s NOT.

  28. #128
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:41 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    Like the Air Force guys say, “You know you are over the target when you start taking flak!”
    ***
    Keep bombing them hard Michelle–you are “on target”.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  29. #129
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:43 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    I’m sorry, but it wasn’t long ago that I served. We still had the odd race driven issue in any untis I was in.

    I remember once a black soldier complaining about “white week” and the complaint getting all the way to a weekly BUB with the BN CDR. That was kind of funny.

  30. #130
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:50 am, max said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:15 am, jangar said:

    Hole World – that dark, underbelly side of our world.

    right… ya know, liberals
    :)

  31. #131
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:51 am, Laree said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:43 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    I’m sorry, but it wasn’t long ago that I served. We still had the odd race driven issue in any untis I was in.

    I don’t know where you were serving or with who, and what branch. We had several different duty tours “Career Military” 27 years, there were times we were the minority, we didn’t care, we didn’t get treated any different by black people in the unit. In fact we were all friends that is how it works. My husband was an NCO so were you at troop level? In fact we had a friend from previous unit, someone at St Louis- whose husband was hurt by an IED in Iraq, and we got to visit him/them at Ft Sam, they had served together before in a different unit. You think we cared what color skin each of us was?

    The same goes for the last tour my husband was in 2 years ago. Race was not a factor, they were “Mission” oriented.

  32. #132
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:52 am, Flyoverman said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:26 am, zeroangel said:

    Someone like MM is going to attract some lunatics. That’s all.

    So……. you found me out.

    Thanks for spilling the beans. ;)

  33. #133
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:52 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    I’m not disputing that it’s barely an issue. I am saying though, it’s not completely vanished. Are you telling me you have never run across a problem soldier that was a racist? Don’t be silly.

  34. #134
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:53 am, zeroangel said:

    Flyoverman:

    LOL.

  35. #135
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:55 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 9:53 am, zeroangel said:
    jangar:

    He’s fine, thank you for asking. Behaving much like you would expect an infant primate to behave. He poops, cries, eats. Occasionally smiles, which is really cute.

    Hey zero! He was asking about your kid, not Congress!

  36. #136
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:56 am, calgirl said:

    God bless you, Michelle, for all that you do. You are in the vanguard for those of us who love freedom and liberty. You are the voice for those of us in the hinterlands who have no voice. Keep up the excellent work. May God bless you and keep you.

  37. #137
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:56 am, happyscrapper said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:52 am, zeroangel said:
    Laree:

    I’m not disputing that it’s barely an issue. I am saying though, it’s not completely vanished. Are you telling me you have never run across a problem soldier that was a racist? Don’t be silly.

    I am going to inject an opinion here and say…racism in the military is probably less than in the general population, but there will always be the exception to the rule. A few bigots get in wherever you go.

  38. #138
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:57 am, zeroangel said:

    Rogue:

    LOL. If I were describing congress I would have used the example of some kind of parasite or fungus, not a primate.

  39. #139
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:57 am, happyscrapper said:

    Hey zero! He was asking about your kid, not Congress!

    Good one, Cheddar!!

  40. #140
    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:58 am, zeroangel said:

    happyscrapper:

    …and I agree 100% with you (as I already said). I am not sure why Laree is disputing what I say.

  41. #141
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:00 am, SpeakEasy said:

    Who says President Obama is not inspiring people to action?! The Racist-in-Chief is advancing racial discussion, albeit one-sided.

    “I see your true colors shining through,
    I see your true colors, and that’s why I hate you…….”

    (Apologies to Cyndy Lauper)

  42. #142
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:01 am, Laree said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:52 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    I’m not disputing that it’s barely an issue. I am saying though, it’s not completely vanished. Are you telling me you have never run across a problem soldier that was a racist? Don’t be silly

    .

    First off I am not Silly That’s an offensive worn out Liberal insult. Did I ever run into a racist solider? I ran into good old boys, but they were socializing with minorities too, so tell me how much was race a factor to them? Out and Out neo nazi stuff NO I never ran into skin heads or anything that resembled them. But seeing how my husband isn’t Caucasian, they wouldn’t be approaching us anyway would they? Do they exist, in very small amounts, the U.S. Military has made it clear there is zero tolerance. (So I would not call race an issue in the American Military)

  43. #143
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:04 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    What are you arguing with me over? I was actually thinking of black racist soldiers (I have seen more than one).

  44. #144
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:13 am, Laree said:

    zeroangel

    We served in tours across the south, we were always tight with who we served with, sometimes there were only a few ethnicities represented. We have made life long friends, we all moved around and kept in contact with each other it’s how it works for career military. When our friend’s husband ended up at Brookes Medical Center after IED in Iraq, it was like being able to catch up with each other. It was good for him to have someone familiar local while he was rehabilitating.

    We ran into personalities that’s human nature but we didn’t run into bigotry, we didn’t get excluded, and we didn’t exclude. There were times my husband would report if he thought a female troop was being taken advantage of, that is also a no no in the military, but it still goes on. In fact that was more of a focus than race – sexism.

  45. #145
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:19 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    Look, I get the fact that I might have rubbed you the wrong way by it seeming like I was telling you your opinion was wrong. I am told that I can come off as being abrasive. It was not my intent.

    You aren’t seriously trying to tell me that you have never dealt with a race-driven issue in the military? What are EEO classes for then? Completely pointless and unnescery? (You could make that case actually, LOL)

    My whole point in my first post to you was to highlight that these hate mails are probably hand picked as the worst of the worst and that civilians (as a whole) are probably just as well off as the military, but the military is probably a bit better.

    The fact is, I am agreeing with you. What are you arguing with me for?

  46. #146
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:32 am, happyscrapper said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 10:58 am, zeroangel said:
    happyscrapper:

    …and I agree 100% with you (as I already said). I am not sure why Laree is disputing what I say.

    It’s o.k., Zero. Not everyone will agree with you all the time. Remember, we are all individuals with different points of view. You do tend to personalize disagreement. Just take the debate as it is intended. One person’s viewpoint vs another’s. That might help us to stop arguing and getting the threads all muddled up and disagreeable to read!

  47. #147
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:35 am, Laree said:

    zeroangel

    The Military is stated to reflect our bigger American population at large if that is true, than we are not in that bad of shape. There are a lot of good people serving. My nephew just enlisted in the Navy, first sailor in our family, I think? We have had Marines but up till now we haven’t had a sailor.

    I am not sure about the hate mail? I wonder about the source of a lot of hate mail, and trolling on the internet. Is it really coming out of the majority of Americans? The Internet doesn’t have fences. I am not sure Michelle is cherry picking, I just wonder about the geographic source of the emails.

  48. #148
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:37 am, zeroangel said:

    Happyscrapper:

    I don’t mind disagreement. But Laree is either 1) disagreeing with something that isn’t my position or 2) arguing with me despite the fact that we agree.

    It doesn’t make any sense.

    You seem to take this personal

    …and you seem to want to chastise me at every opportunity. Pot…kettle.

  49. #149
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:40 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    Yes, I actually do agree with you WRT the military on the topic of race, as I said.

    In any case, I’m not sure about the hate mail, however, it’s just some lunatics. Every polemic will get them. People on the left get death threats and hate mails too.

  50. #150
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:40 am, happyscrapper said:

    …and you seem to want to chastise me at every opportunity. Pot…kettle.

    Um…Zero…you are a petulant little boy who refuses to give an inch and wants to continue to argue long after the subject has been exhausted…thus hijacking yet another thread. Please stop now. If no one engages you further, maybe this will be the end.

  51. #151
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:40 am, CyberCipher said:

    Gee, Michelle, maybe when Culture of Corruption goes into its second printing, you can have some of those comments printed on the book’s jacket cover. Okay, okay, I’m just kidding.

    My collie says:

    Good Lord, the Obamabots are STUPID — even by HUMAN standards.

    Yeah. For them, Gary Ridgway, Green River killer, with an IQ of 82, is what’s known as a “towering intellect”.

  52. #152
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:42 am, Laree said:

    I think I am protective of the U.S. Military, we have spent a long time in it, with so many members of our family serving in it. I just have knee jerk reaction to criticism. The American Military is not perfect, but I would trust the many people we have served with -with my back without hesitation not based on their ethnicity.

    It effected us deeply when a friend suffered from that IED blast in Iraq. My husband asked him what happened. Well there were three of them, one was killed, one lost a limb, and our friend was all messed up but got to keep his parts. What was going on before it happened…he joked, I was just standing there minding my own business. I Love American Military Service People, race has nothing to do with it.

  53. #153
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:47 am, zeroangel said:

    happyscrapper:

    If no one engages you further, maybe this will be the end.

    Take your own advice Sybil. Every shortcoming you attribute to me is a perfect fit to you as well. Laree isn’t arguing with me anymore. You are. Idiot.

  54. #154
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:49 am, L.N. Smithee said:

    reshas1 cut and pasted Chris Charles, who wrote:

    Somehow, over the last 50 years, too many blacks have bought into this notion that the Democratic Party is the party that fights for blacks. The truth is the DNC is still keeping blacks subjugated with the subtle racism of lower expectations. The Dems have substituted overt racism with a quieter form that claims to advance the standing of blacks in society but really the hand of big brother is holding black people back, keeping them from being truly free. Democrats now celebrate anytime a person of color achieves a position of high standing because that person is a minority. Conservatives celebrate all Americans that are successful regardless of color, creed, or anything else for that matter.

    Amen, sister!

    Here’s how I put it ten years ago in a stream-of-consciousness rant I wrote after reading noted black novelist Toni Morrison’s 1998 New Yorker piece in which she called Bill Clinton the “first black President” because he is a “born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas” from a single-parent household and possessed an “unpoliced sexuality” (I’m not making ANY of that up, folks):

    If you think that Clinton is all but black, I say, Toni, thanks for nothing. If this reflects your attitude about the inabilities of our people, you are still on the plantation, dearie. You still think we can’t rise above our backgrounds (presuming, as the likes of you do, that we are all born poor and abused and have a defeatist attitude). You don’t think of your own people as having future potential, you think of us as having unremovable shackles perpetually preventing us from being seen as anything but homo sapiens’ also-rans. You can’t think in terms of equality that is earned — only that which is granted to the lowly by the high and mighty at the threat of violent revolution. You worship Clinton-types because they kowtow to curry your favor and get your vote, not because they view you as equals. You hate blacks like Ward Connerly, Clarence Thomas and Alan Keyes because they want to compete before the playing field is “leveled” the way that many Asian and European peoples who have ventured to America have; your type wants to be fed at the breast of white America, never satisfied that the time for weaning has arrived, yet wailing that it will never come.

    In short, despite your fame, talent, wealth, and accomplishments, you are not an example of the solution. You are part of the problem.

  55. #155
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:49 am, zeroangel said:

    Laree:

    Yes, I know how you feel about the military, I feel the same way. Mah bad, I didn’t mean to instigate a knee-jerk response, I was just trying to illustrate my point about hate mail.

    Sorry to hear about your friend. My unit in Iraq lost a few guys, but I’ll admit I wasn’t close to them (at least not THAT close).

  56. #156
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:52 am, jdsbc98 said:

    Good thing there isn’t a website called Spamyourenemies.com that would be really bad for these guys hahaha

  57. #157
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:52 am, L.N. Smithee said:

    zeroangel wrote:

    Someone like MM is going to attract some lunatics. That’s all.

    What person of any notable accomplishment and/or notoriety doesn’t attract lunatics, zero? Enlighten me.

  58. #158
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:54 am, zeroangel said:

    L.N. Smithee:

    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/28/e-mails-of-the-day-2/comment-page-2/#comment-757397

    In any case, I’m not sure about the hate mail, however, it’s just some lunatics. Every polemic will get them. People on the left get death threats and hate mails too.

    Please read what I write.

  59. #159
    On July 28th, 2009 at 11:55 am, jdsbc98 said:

    http://www.kwck999.com/page.php?jock_id=727

    Here is Mr. Del Hughes and the Company he works for.

  60. #160
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, zeroangel said:

    Here is Mr. Del Hughes and the Company he works for.

    Interesting.

  61. #161
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, spaceycakes said:

    You know what these people are?
    Boring.

  62. #162
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    ‘middle aged’ blond hair conservative gun clinging white male – but dont profile me or I will be offended

    maybe my fantasy personnae is as a successful asian black jewish woman selling my body outside the gates of the Air Force Academy.

    maybe i should go back where I came from, nah, its almost time for ski season :)

  63. #163
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, prendad said:

    Hey, does somebody need a time-out? I love it Michelle, when you post these hate emails. Besides being unbelievable, they show how thin-skinned and ignorant some of these liberals are. Since these idiots will never apologize for their racist comments, I will apologize for them. I am sorry that people like this are living in our country, and calling themselves Americans.

  64. #164
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:16 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    From that email, I didnt expect Bubba Del to be from the same area as Clinton, Arkansas. hmmmmmmmm what are the odds, praise be.

  65. #165
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:17 pm, granite said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, prendad said:

    Since these idiots parasites will never apologize for their racist comments, I will apologize for them. I am sorry that people like this are living in our country, and calling themselves Americans.

    I agree.
    Such people contribute nothing helpful to our nation/society/culture…they only take.

  66. #166
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:17 pm, luckydogg said:

    Michelle,
    Conservative woman ( Yourself, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin…the list is long….) scare the left, Because people take the time to hear what you have to say……The left seems to only have hate in their words……

  67. #167
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, dlabedz said:

    Michelle,

    The hypocrisy of the left will always show when you or any other female conservative expose liberals.

    Criticism should only apply to conservatives.

    I truly appreciate your courage!

    David

    Warren, Michigan

  68. #168
    On July 28th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, James Felix said:

    I ran into good old boys, but they were socializing with minorities too, so tell me how much was race a factor to them? Out and Out neo nazi stuff NO I never ran into skin heads or anything that resembled them.

    There is an awful lot of ground in between “there are no race issues in the military” and “the military is full of skinheads”.

    I was in the navy ’86 – ’91, and for the most part everyone got along (we wer literally all in the same boat). Squabbles were much more likely to be based on department or division than on race. But I can’t say I saw zero incidents in which race was a big factor.

  69. #169
    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, sonofdy said:

    Race can be a huge problem in the military as are gender issues. Lower enlisted use these hot button items to call IG and “get back” at NCO’s and officers who they don’t like. I saw it many times. Usualy it was used by minorities and women against white males.

  70. #170
    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:28 pm, sonofdy said:

    One guy got kicked out of PLDC because he told a female to “quit your b!tching and pick up the f#$king M60″. She was the generals driver and had ZERO leadership skills. Given her performance in PLDC and the field, her skills were probably in another area.

    BTW it was her turn to carry the thing, we only had to carry it for a mile each…

  71. #171
    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:39 pm, CowboyBebop said:

    I’m sure you’ve gotten used to this type of vitriol after all these years Michelle, but it still has to be a little upsetting to a certain extent. It truly is amazing the things people will say to someone. And to think it’s Conservatives and Republicans that are “racist.”

  72. #172
    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, Meorum said:

    That’s why I’m not a liberal or a democrat:

    I’m not a racist.

  73. #173
    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:51 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    I don’t like the hypenated-American stuff either. But is Canada a good example? I mean, I thought the entire province of Quebec tried to secede from the rest of Canada a few years ago.

    Aren’t Canucks actually “French-Canadiens?”

    Help me out here.

  74. #174
    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    It never fails…behind every accusation of racism, lies a racist bigot. More often than not, it is a “person of color” making the accusation, and that person is always a liberal.

    Right_on, with your permission I would like to include this in my random quotes. Truer words were ne’er spake.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  75. #175
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Socratease said:

    In the old America, people came here from other countries to share in the American dream, forget about the problems they left, and build a better future. In today’s America, people come here from other countries so they can bring the problems of their old country with them, have them paid for by other taxpayers, complain about how America does things, and tell everyone who will listen how proud they are of the place they left.

  76. #176
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On July 28th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, sonofdy said:
    I saw it many times. Usualy it was used by minorities and women against white males.”

    Saw a girl who was in trouble and had the assignment to clean the female head. The Chief walked in to inspect unannounced and she brought him up on charges. It was eventually dropped and she got in worse trouble, but still, it was an administrative headache.

    One guy called a female a c***. From what I understand she deserved it. He got busted from E6 to E5 and kicked out just a few months before his retirement.

    And that was 10+ yrs ago. Who knows how bad it is now.

  77. #177
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:07 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Occasionally smiles, which is really cute.

    That’s gas.

    HAHA

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  78. #178
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, zeroangel said:

    James / sonofdy / RabbidSquirrel:

    Thank you for illustrating my point. I can think of a few examples myself:

    A black male soldier that was eventually processed out (on another issue) who made repeated cries of unfounded racism against superiors.

    A black female CPT that brought IG down on the BN CDR, also unfounded and came to nothing.

    A black LTC who clearly favored black soldiers over the whites, I remember when I first met him he somehow managed to shoehorn into the conversation a long rant about how his wife was a civil-rights activist in the distant past, the very clear message being, you better not ever slip up, whitey.

    I even had one or two unfounded accusations against moi.

    One of my favorites (though pretty innocuous) was mentioned earlier: on the unit training schedule (printed and hung in all the company areas) was a solid week labeled “white week.” It was called that because that was a blank week with no BN mandated training in which the CO CDRs had their time for thier training. A black soldier complained, “why do whites get a week? They got all the other weeks already!” This was brought up in a weekly BUB in which the CSM felt it necessary to tell the 1SGs to be sure and educate their soldiers on what exactly “white week” means. LOL

  79. #179
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    It’s amazing how many unarmed people decide to engage Michelle in a battle of wits.

    … and incredible fun watching her cream them!

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  80. #180
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    I wish the Republican party would explain its philosophy better (does it have one?)

    Yes.

    It’s simply to do everything the Donks do, only slower.

    Time for real Americans to unite against the lying thugs in both major parties.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  81. #181
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, abstractmind said:

    See, I’m really glad i made popcorn to snack on after lunch ;) I love reading me some hate mail LOL.

    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    typically, thats how arguing with a liberal works ;) It’s not really hard to argue with someone who begins the discussion in the wrong.

    Sorry I’ve been gone for so long, folks…been away on work in other places where internet isn’t a priority to have :( I’ll be around ;)

  82. #182
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, zeroangel said:

    abstractmind:

    Good to see you again. Welcome back.

  83. #183
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, sonofdy said:

    Zero, had one against me as well. It was such a horriable example of racism that I to this day can’t remember the event. Anyway, it was dissmissed. But in bosnia, I had a black platoon sergeant who made what should have been an easy deployment a living hell for all of the platoons white soldiers. We complained to the 1sg (also black) and nothing was done.

    So every single NCO in that platoon requested a transfer at once. ONLY time I have seen that. Talk about coming unglued. Took the best platoon in the battlion and made it the worst in less that 4 months.

  84. #184
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, zeroangel said:

    sonofdy:

    Yah, it’s a real pity. It really ‘effs up unit-cohesiveness and the sad thing is, it seems to come out of the minorities more often than not.

    I had an NCO subordinate to me complain that I only gave him a hard time because I was a racist. The truth was him (and his buddy, who also complained) were POS. One of them ended up making a negligent discharge and found himself relegated to duties befitting of a Private, and the other went home on mid tour and eventually checked himself into rehab after abusing nose candy during his leave. Guess which racist was on the damn tactical phones calling local police and his relatives trying to figure out why the ‘eff he never came back from mid-tour?

  85. #185
    On July 28th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, Lucifer Jones said:

    This is all about the encroachment of statism on our freedoms. Any thing that gets in its way is a threat, and you see this through the actions of the politicians, the press, academia, labor and entertainment, many of our peers (such as the ones I left in San Francisco) and even family members. Maybe this is what is meant by “I shall set brother against brother”, etc and so on.

    We might think that since we are not in the miltary overseas, that we are out of harm’s way, that we’re not really in a war. Though this is not a shooting war, we are in a war waged from the very elements aforementioned, and I do agree that we must resign ourselves that this war may go on for the rest of our lives, and that as souls we must be up to the task of dealing with this courageously, just as Michelle is doing in her peaceful way, with the truth and the pen as her proverbial swords.

    Maybe this is the norm of the human condition, and this is what’s required of those who want take things to a higher plane, spiritually.

    Statism, on the other hand, represents the numbing of the souls, the giving over of free will to darkness, despair, inhumanity, the reliance on external validation and loss of autonomy.

    Gotta go now.

  86. #186
    On July 28th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, rplatt said:

    Well, you can certainly tell they’re Obama Kool Aid drinkers. They have no discernible intellect so they jump up and down, slobber on themselves and regurgitate vile utterings.

  87. #187
    On July 28th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, denver republican said:

    I’m pretty sure Chatora8@aol.com meant by that rant “I want to receive e-mails from the RNC and Heritage Foundation” so I made it so.

  88. #188
    On July 28th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Sorry but I guess I missed something. There was someplace Michelle went at which we could have bought her?

  89. #189
    On July 28th, 2009 at 3:37 pm, sonofdy said:

    ZEROANGEL, when I was an E$ during a UN peacekeeping mission to FYROM, we had a soldier desert. From a freaking peacekeeping mission. He was an 88M whoes only job was to resupply the o.p’s.

    When caught he said the preasure of driving trucks was too much for him.

    He never even saw a Serb.

  90. #190
    On July 28th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, sonofdy said:

    Thats E4 not E$

  91. #191
    On July 28th, 2009 at 3:45 pm, zeroangel said:

    sonofdy:

    You know, though it’s a good thing that the military takes PTSD seriously these days, too many soldiers use it as a cop-out.

    I can’t stand it. Life is ‘effin hard. Get over it! Look, war sucks, I get it, it’s really, really, sh|tty. However, there are things people deal with in the course of their lives that is far worse: death of a loved one, divorce, losing a job, etc. It’s a shame that Joe figured out how to play the system. It’s even more shameful when the far-left exploits these folks.

  92. #192
    On July 28th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, rightisright said:

    Great work Michelle, you know your doing right when the libturds rise up out of their doldrums enough to send ignorant, stupid emails. Those emails do epitomize the intelligence of the far left or is that lack of intelligence?
    That’s the stupidity that has brought this great country to the brink of failure.

  93. #193
    On July 28th, 2009 at 4:41 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “You know, though it’s a good thing that the military takes PTSD seriously these days, too many soldiers use it as a cop-out.”

    Before you get too far out there regarding your opinion of PTSD I suggest your read Waking the Tiger by Peter Levine.

  94. #194
    On July 28th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, Savage24 said:

    I see that the left wing nutcases are still running to form. Crazier then ever.

  95. #195
    On July 28th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, zeroangel said:

    jsmiddleton4:

    If it wasn’t clearly infered from me saying:

    it’s a good thing that the military takes PTSD seriously these days

    …I don’t think it’s all BS. However, it is a fact that more than one soldier has used it as a cop-out to get out of duty or trouble. For example:

    “I beat my wife because of PTSD!”

    No, you didn’t, you were a Fobbit and you have a history of violence. Follow me?

  96. #196
    On July 28th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, sonofdy said:

    Before you get too far out there regarding your opinion of PTSD I suggest your read Waking the Tiger by Peter Levine.

    REAL PTSD is different from fakers who use it as an excuse to do bad things. Its the military equilivant of “i did it because daddy touched me”.

    The real cases need help but the fakers need to be shot.

  97. #197
    On July 28th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “but the fakers need to be shot.”

    Then the shooters would have ptsd…..

  98. #198
    On July 28th, 2009 at 5:38 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Ok zero, don’t read something that may open your eyes up to unresolved trauma and how it exhibits itself. I wouldn’t want you to learn something.

    I thought I beat my wife for PMDD not PTSD….?

  99. #199
    On July 28th, 2009 at 5:42 pm, zeroangel said:

    jsmiddleton4:

    I didn’t say I wouldn’t read it. You said this:

    Before you get too far out there regarding your opinion of PTSD

    I was just merely pointing out that my opinion is not “far out there” and balanced. If an officer or NCO has a soldier that suddenly comes down with a case of PTSD after facing down the wrong end of a UCMJ action, they aren’t doing there jobs if they take the soldier’s claims at face value.

    I thought I beat my wife for PMDD not PTSD….?

    LOL. Good one.

  100. #200
    On July 28th, 2009 at 5:59 pm, michele hampton said:

    I worry for your safety, Michelle. Please make sure you take care because you are gift to us and your family. I can’t wait to buy your book, it is on my agenda this week. Keep up the great work…God be with you!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook