A message from Lanny Davis to The Mob

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 6, 2009 08:20 AM

Yesterday, I pointed to a piece by Lanny Davis at Politico’s Arena falsely accusing Obamacare protesters of being “organized by the Republican right” — and calling on the media to investigate and photograph grass-roots activists who forcefully express their views.

Mr. Davis sent me an e-mail last night seeking to “clear up any misunderstanding about my position and beliefs.”

I am reprinting his message in full and will leave it to you to compare what he wrote at Politico with what he’s saying now:

From: Davis, Lanny J.
Sent: Wed Aug 05 22:21:11 2009

To readers of Michelle Malkin’s blog who responded to my post on Politico earlier in the morning:

I received a number of thoughtful emails and wanted to express my appreciation to those who communicated their sincere concerns. There was a misimpression that I was in favor of suppression or discouragement of dissent concerning Democratic positions on national health care issues at congressional town hall meetings. This was not my intent. I do not wish in any way investigate, photo, or suppress the opinions of people who show up to these meetings regarding concerns about Democratic health care proposals. Indeed, I welcome that because we need more debate on this important issue.

My post specifically criticized only those who shout down and prevent others from speaking. Indeed, I specifically expressed my respect in that post for those who are genuinely concerned about the health care proposals.

Finally, some sincere people who communicated with me asked whether I had or would condemn those on the left who disrupted meetings or shouted down speakers on the conservative side of the spectrum. The answer is: Yes I would and I have. Publicly.

I believe that thoughtful and civil people on the left and the right share a desire for debate and have respect for other people’s opinions. This is fundamental to a civil society and our great democracy. In my post, I only wished to protest strongly those who believe it is acceptable to attend a meeting for the purpose of disrupting and preventing honest and vigorous debate.

I take the same position if it is people on the left side of the spectrum who use such tactics as those on the right side.

Sincerely,

Lanny Davis

***

Related must-read: Doctor Zero explains to the smear merchants “Who We Are.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:25 am, jbh45 said:

    sorry I don’t buy it.

  2. #2
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:28 am, Doo2 said:

    Translation: “Oh crap, people are paying attention”

  3. #3
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:29 am, shimauma2 said:

    I received a *number* of thoughtful emails and wanted to express my appreciation to those who communicated their sincere concerns

    LOL!!! I bet he was shocked by the politeness, but what’s killing him is the numbers he received; enough to make a statement. The appreciation he expressed in private was probably more akin to the kid that got grounded from the internet.

  4. #4
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:30 am, 509th Bob said:

    Dear Lanny,

    Please tell Frau Blucher at flag@whitehouse.gov that I am one of the “Thought Criminals” you are looking for.

  5. #5
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:32 am, jbh45 said:

    I believe that thoughtful and civil people on the left and the right share a desire for debate and have respect for other people’s opinions.

    The reason that Americans are “disrupting” the propaganda meetings is because this ADMIN and CONGRESS are not allowing a DEBATE!

    WAKE the HELL up!

  6. #6
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:33 am, guitarplayer said:

    Dear Mr. Davis,

    You said that you would publicly condemn those who shout down or disrupt others at meetings. What do you say to people like Nancy Pelosi who say that the protestors at these events are nothing but an angry mob and that the anger here is being manufactured by the RNC and insurance companies? Would you equally condemn these remarks?

  7. #7
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:34 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    There’s this:

    “Let’s have the media name names, publish photographs, and do interviews of those responsible for approving, even organizing these techniues (sic). And let’s find an investigative journalist – are there many left – to prove these so-called grassroots shouters are, or are not, being paid.”

    Then this:

    I do not wish in any way investigate, photo, or suppress the opinions of people who show up to these meetings regarding concerns about Democratic health care proposals. Indeed, I welcome that because we need more debate on this important issue.

    My post specifically criticized only those who shout down and prevent others from speaking.

    Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt

    and

    “Sunlight IS the best disinfectant!”

  8. #8
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:37 am, willie peter said:

    Lanny f’ng Davis.

    Hey Lanny, I’ll cut you some slack for being a lying two faced weasel.

    Because at the end of the day, it’s got to suck to be you.

  9. #9
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:37 am, ajmontana said:

    well, we know now he can read and write, so maybe if were lucky he’ll actually read the Bill and not follow along like a little lost duck behind Nan’s idiotic talking points.

    who are they blaming this week?
    Bush
    Insurance companies
    Miss Olearys cow???????

  10. #10
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:44 am, limmo said:

    All day yesterday, I thought about these outrageous comments by Dems. Once again, they either don’t get or ignore their own raging hypocrisy. Lanny’s original artical was itself a ‘shout-down.’ Left-wing Dems have been trying to label opponents as wing-nuts for years now, with some success, in an attempt to demonize and marginalize, to shut us the frig up. They inappropriately label opponents as hate-mongers, racists, bigots, Nazi’s, extremists, zealots, thugs, mob members, easily led, stupid, idiots, out of the main stream (when conservatives in the US are much more main-stream than are left-wing libs.) THEY engage in name-calling. THEY routinely SHOUT DOWN their opponents, and have been for years! They are projecting with this latest round of vicious, un-called for attacks. THEY are going after citizens simply expressing their frustration over this unprecidented government power grab. THEY want to end discussion. THEY do it so often that they expect, erroniously, that everyone does it.

    Oh and hey, do any of you recall Lanny ever speaking out or blogging critically about ANY shoutdown by the left-wing of people with whom they disagree. Youtube is rife with examples. Michelle posted a bunch yesterday. Did Lanny call those left wing shout-downers Nazis or other names for preventing their opponents from speaking… even yesterday or today.

  11. #11
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:53 am, sonofdy said:

    Not buying it either.

  12. #12
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:53 am, et said:

    Did Lanny realize that even his fellow socialists at the ACLU couldn’t stomach the overreaching and paranoia behavior of our party in power?

    In fact it might be fun to invite the ACLU to a Townhall meeting or Tea Party near you.

  13. #13
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:54 am, backwoods conservative said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:28 am, Doo2 said:

    Translation: “Oh crap, people are paying attention”

    Yeah, these shysters always express their regrets when they get caught. I didn’t say anything directly to Lanny, myself. I just reported him to the fishy snitch.

  14. #14
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:55 am, stillontheroad said:

    Oy, Lanny – read this:

    5 U.S.C. § 552a, United States agencies, including the Executive Office of the President shall, “maintain no record describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity.”
    ________________________________________

  15. #15
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:56 am, CO2 Producer said:

    Please, please, everyone calm down and wait your turn. Everyone will get a chance to—whoa, it’s getting late. Sosorryouttatimegottagobye.

  16. #16
    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:59 am, pressto said:

    Just one of many examples about what liberals think about these types of actions.

    http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0812/19/ltm.01.html

    ROBERTS: Hey, by the way, you were at the Code Pink demonstration at the White House, where they dressed somebody up as President Bush in prison garb and were throwing shoes at him. What was does about? And why?

    MILBANK: It was an inspired bit of political satire. The guy himself apparently is apologizing, but they’re making him like a hero. You know, the next Cindy Sheehan. They were throwing clogs and pumps and sandals and boots, pretty much everything they could at this gigantic paper mache Bush. I got a little close to him and got pelted with a couple of shoes myself, John.

    Yes we could fill the pages here with supposed reporters stating how these people were “Hero” for doing their violent and disruptive actions.

  17. #17
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:00 am, RedDog said:

    A poster title for the next townhall healthcare meeting:

    HEY WHAT’S NEXT YOU LITTLE NAPOLEON?
    SOYLENT GREEN?

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=soylent+green&aq=f&oq=&aqi=n1g10

  18. #18
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:01 am, Misscheryl said:

    I take the same position if it is people on the left side of the spectrum who use such tactics as those on the right side.

    pfffttt..actions speak louder than words. The outrage from the left was deafening when Bush was in office and pies were being thrown, protestors threatening anyone who disagreed, anyone who supported the war was being villified….. Ah huh! This dumb redneck is paying very close attention.

  19. #19
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:05 am, granite said:

    Unless Davis could convince a stump – never mind a rational, informed person – that he denounced even one instance of the barbaric, animalistic behavior/actions of democrat socialist supporters/demonstrators/”protesters”/disrupters/college “students”/and the rest of their ilk over the past 40+ years, his emailed explanation is nothing more than bu!!$h!t.

  20. #20
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:05 am, et said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:55 am, stillontheroad said:

    Oy, Lanny – read this:

    5 U.S.C. § 552a, United States agencies, including the Executive Office of the President shall, “maintain no record describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity.”

    Would that be a High Crime or Misdemeanor?

  21. #21
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:07 am, Socky said:

    I take the same position if it is people on the left side of the spectrum who use such tactics as those on the right side.

    When exactly did you criticize the over-the-top left, Mr. Dick-Cheney-Should-Be-Indicted?

  22. #22
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:10 am, Laree said:

    My Representative Read the Bill Did Yours? Video Happy Hour Fox Business News.

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-representative-read-bill-all-1018.html

  23. #23
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:12 am, Flyoverman said:

    Lanny Davis had the courage and courtesy to respond in a thoughtful manner. I think we need to be careful and be very aware that we will be judged by our response to this letter.

    There are many things through the years that I have disagreed with him on. Is he a loyalist, certainly. But he’s not a nut job like Pelosi, Durbin, Boxer, etc.

    I thank him for his prompt and thoughtful response and I agree with him that discourse while spirited must be tempered with respect and courtesy.

    I know several of us are not buying what he wrote, but we need to give him the benefit of the doubt and then after doing so, expect the same courtesy in return.

    My opinion.

  24. #24
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:16 am, Flyoverman said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:00 am, RedDog said:

    Make sure you have the t-shirt when you go. ;)

    http://www.soylent-green.com/

  25. #25
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:17 am, Jaded said:

    He misses the point those people are angry and those Democrats won’t LET THEM SPEAK so they must be heard and if that entails shouting then so be it!.

    The fact that he would have those who are loud photographed and told on is despicable PERIOD. I know he is a leftist but really this is AMERICA and we are FREE to say what we want as loud and as proud as we want without government inteference.

    To Lanny and the DNC and the other tools on the left I have one thing I want to remind them of….The 1st Amendment to the Constiution….READ IT!
    http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am1.html

    No where in it does it mention no shouting it mentions peaceably however one person’s peace is NOT for the government to decide. It NEVER mentions taking names, photographing or otherwise any other government intervention based on the opinions of people like Lanny!

  26. #26
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:24 am, dutchcedar said:

    Lanny’s apology is cool.

    Now if he would make the apology at the place he had the piece published at, that would be really cool.

    I’m sure the “misimpression” was made on readers at Politico as well as here.

    Otherwise, its a half-baked apology, albeit a cool one.

  27. #27
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:25 am, theporch said:

    Regarding Lanny Davis. I sent Sheehan’s picture to the ‘snitch” site and asked them to please be sure that Lanny received it since he was looking for people expressing their views.

  28. #28
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:26 am, cabrerski said:

    Isn’t it funny…
    When people who are paid to express political opinion (read “spin”) are quick to assume that others who express the opposite viewpoint are being paid as well.
    Note to Lanny Davis: There are very few hired political guns in America (except for 90% of those in the Beltway). Some of us in the real world just happen to give a damn!

  29. #29
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:27 am, spaceycakes said:

    The answer is: Yes I would and I have. Publicly.

    Since this is ‘public’, I suggest you show us where…

    Otherwise, BS.

  30. #30
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:27 am, madmonkphotog said:

    Liar, liar, pants on fire.

  31. #31
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:29 am, GraniteMan said:

    If just ONE time he had urged the left to quiet down on just ONE college campus and let ONE conservative speaker say ONE word I might believe him BUT not once has this SOB said ONE word (that was in any paper, blog, video, program that I read, viewed) about allowing a conservative to speak. Just ask, David Horawitz(spelling?) Ann Coulter, Rush or any other well known conservative speaker or politician.

  32. #32
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:32 am, d1carter said:

    Lanny is right about one thing…they can have the MSM do what ever they want them to. The problem is that Lanny and his buddies can not control the American people and sometimes conservatives will “get in your face” as well.
    When the White House and its MSM castigates a large segment of the American public, there is going to be trouble.

  33. #33
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:32 am, limmo said:

    Prior to yesterday, I had no beef with Lanny. Now, I would like to see one example where he ever objected in print or other media to left-wing protestors who actually did stop people from speaking because they didn’t like their political opinions. Michelle posted a bunch of vids yesterday. Examples are all over Youtube, but I don’t recall seeing Lanny condemn any of those when they happened. Any one else?

  34. #34
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:32 am, corkie said:

    Lanny’s right about what he originally wrote.

    But Michelle misidentified the problem with what he originally wrote.

    I don’t blame Lanny for condemning the use to publicly disruptive techniques.

    I blame Lanny for falsely accusing the right of using these techniques.

    Some people at some of the meetings seem to have become overheated due to frustration. But that wasn’t caused by one obscure libertarian that sent an email to 10 people!

  35. #35
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:34 am, theporch said:

    You are right Limmo. Lanny was doing what libs do. A non apology apology. Kinda like what the o did. But of course the o is cool. I always wanted an ultra liberal activists that was cool as pres.

  36. #36
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:34 am, kcnut said:

    Flag me i’m a nazi cause i don’t support obamacare. I care about america and maybe it cause i have cerebal palsy but taxing me to death and protesting the bill don’t make me a nazi. It’s make me a american. I will never submit.

  37. #37
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:35 am, GraniteMan said:

    Which reminds me. When these blue dogs come home on recess and all that comes out of their mouths is lies and they stand there and tell us they haven’t read the bill how in the hell can a sane person stay quiet? Have them tell the truth Lannie, and we’ll remain quiet. Then we’ll vote them out of office in 2010. Remember gang we gotta keep this anger till 2010 and then 2012 and beyond. Protect our Constitution and our Country!

  38. #38
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:36 am, theporch said:

    Let us not be fooled into thinking that the obamabots will not plant their selves in some of these meetings and disrupt them and get their picture taken by the friendly msm and have it plastered all over the msm news(?).

  39. #39
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am, Misscheryl said:

    9:29 am, GraniteMan said:

    Ditto that!

    The only reason Lanny is speaking up now is because he is well aware how angry the silent majority is but he’s a day late and a dollar short.

  40. #40
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:39 am, Misscheryl said:

    9:36 am, theporch said:

    This is war and it will escalate. I don’t put anything past the left. They are hardly on the side of moral code and character.

  41. #41
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:40 am, Marshall Russ said:

    I will never forget the night I was watching H&C. Lanny and Mark Levine were the guests that night. Lanny was going on about some liberal nonsense and Mark had had enough and said, “Oh you are so full of crap!” The look on Lanny’s face made me literally fall of the couch screaming with laughter. Priceless. I think of that every time I see his liberal apologist mug on T.V.

  42. #42
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:41 am, Socky said:
  43. #43
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:41 am, theporch said:

    We have seen what code pink does at some of these hearings and what ever happens to them? They are escorted out only to return again and again. The libs have to know that they let them in. If not then if this is the kind of security we have in this country then God help us and our fight against terrorists.

  44. #44
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:42 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    some sincere people who communicated with me asked whether I had or would condemn those on the left who disrupted meetings or shouted down speakers on the conservative side of the spectrum. The answer is: Yes I would and I have. Publicly.

    Okay. Let’s see it.
    Who’s got good search skills? Can someone find his public condemnations of Left wing nutcases?

  45. #45
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:43 am, hunter said:

    I don’t buy it either.

    I know several of us are not buying what he wrote, but we need to give him the benefit of the doubt and then after doing so, expect the same courtesy in return.

    Sorry Flyoverman, but I disagree. you don’t get the benifit of the doubt when in a few hours you make a complete 180 in what you are saying.

    And as with you, this is just my opinion.

  46. #46
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:45 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    HI FLYOVERMAN #23–Well said! I was about to write something similar when I saw your post.
    ***
    I think Alan Combes (previously of Hannity and Combes) is another very liberal person who is a decent person in many ways.
    ***
    We need to “bring it home” to the liberals–but in a classy way. Michelle Malkin does this very well during her T.V. appearances–although we all “lose our cool” at times–and then have to apologize later! Derangement doesn’t help.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  47. #47
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:45 am, MichaelO said:

    Well, here are some of these dangerous types that need photographing: AARP rank and file giving grief to their (too young) ‘leadership’.

  48. #48
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:47 am, xler8bmw said:

    Again, as an attorney he should know what he is requesting is a violation of 1st and 4th. Why he would make such a ridiculous statement is beyond me!

  49. #49
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:49 am, AmericaFirst said:

    Dear Mr Lanny Davis,
    Please direct me to published material of YOU specifically condemning those on the left who disrupted meetings or shouted down Conservative speakers in the last 8 years. I call your bluff. Your insincere revision of words is laughable. A lie is a lie. A threat is a threat. You made false accusations and have zero evidence to back them up. You want to suppress my First Amendment rights as an American citizen. I do NOT belong to any organization when I assert my rights. I am well informed for any debate. If politicians do not read a bill, vote Yes for it, and it will negatively affect my life… Hell Yes I will assert my right to share my knowledge with the uninformed.

  50. #50
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:56 am, theporch said:

    Let us not forget that the left libs are experts at disinformation and attacks. And of course they have the ever willing msm to protect them and encourage them.

  51. #51
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:56 am, happyscrapper said:

    Yes, I received that reply. It was in my mail this a.m. At least he responded, unlike the congress people I have written to.

    I do want to give an opinion, however that many here might not agree with. We need to shout a little less and listen a little more. WHY??? Because we need to give them a chance to dig their own political graves. And how can they do that if we don’t allow them to use the shovel (thier lying mouths). If we are portrayed as a bunch of screaming lunatics who don’t let them get in a word edgewise, we aren’t doing our cause any good. Yes, we are very angry and have a right to yell. But maybe the yelling should be held until after the politician says something outrageous. Then, have at it. Doesn’t that make more sense? Let them talk. Then yell back at them. I have a feeling we won’t have many more chances to do this, as they are shutting down the town hall meetings all over the place. They are running away and hiding.

  52. #52
    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:58 am, theporch said:

    I think that the most open and enlightening question that can be asked at these meetings is “”How come the Dems voted down an amendment by the Reps that would require Congress to be on the same health plan that they are shoving down our throats?” Doesn’t that kinda cut through all the bs??

  53. #53
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am, ajmontana said:

    Happy, they did speak first, Nans talking points……. plus all the other crap the past year being said. friggin crapweasels all of em.

  54. #54
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am, Paul Revere said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 8:28 am, Doo2 said:

    Translation: “Oh crap, people are paying attention”

    Seriously paying attention. Chicago thugs aren’t used to people paying attention, having facts, and fighting back. They are truly unsure how to handle it.

  55. #55
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am, xler8bmw said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:58 am, theporch said:

    Reps that would require Congress to be on the same health plan that they are shoving down our throats?” Doesn’t that kinda cut through all the bs??

    Judd Gregg said; he wouldn’t even put his dog on this program!

  56. #56
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am, DesertLover said:

    I gotta call “B.S.” on Lanny …

    The only thing that is irritating Lanny and his ilk is the fact that they are now getting thrown back at them the very tactics that the loony left and the Dems in general have used for the last 50 or so years …

    Apology Shmology … just the typical “Oops I got caught” denial, redirection and obfuscation that is an integral part of every Dems playbook …

    We must never again allow Americans to go back to the policy of complacency that has allowed all of these people to get into positions of power so that they could try to take our country away from us …

    The Silent Majority is Silent No More

  57. #57
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:03 am, theporch said:

    Lanny isn’t worth our time here. What is important is this attempt to shove obamacare down our through and the dems will not sign up for it because they have something better and would never want what they have planned for the rest of us peons.

  58. #58
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:04 am, Terri said:

    Will Mr. Davis be writing to the numerous college presidents who refused to allow conservatives to speak, in a polite fashion, at their invited and paid for sessions on their campus’(sp?)(campi as Rush says)? Since he seems to be concerned that conservatives remain polite and allow others to speak; I know those letters are imminent.

  59. #59
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:04 am, theporch said:

    Lanny does not have a vote!!!! He is just a lib wanting attention.

  60. #60
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:06 am, rockhauler said:

    That was a very thoughtful, effective, and well written reply. After much consideration, however, I must conclude that I can’t trust him to be truthful.

    I don’t know why, can’t remember all the details, but Mr. Davis is on my list of those who can’t be trusted. Perhaps it is the company he keeps, or ancient history, or some poorly remembered first impression from many years ago.

    Sorry.

  61. #61
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:06 am, theporch said:

    Judd Gregg said; he wouldn’t even put his dog on this program!

    Let alone his grandparents. Let’s not forget that if we are fortunately to live long enough we will all be in that category sooner or later.

  62. #62
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:08 am, theporch said:

    Anyway lets not lose site of what is happening at an express pace to our country. Lanny is just a distraction. Maybe was done intentionally.

  63. #63
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:11 am, theporch said:

    My point is I don’t trust the libs after how this last election was handled and how many doubts and questions about fraudulent votes were cast.
    Let’s keep our eye on the ball here. It is this push for taking over our country before anyone knows what has happened and before it is too late to get our country and freedoms back.

  64. #64
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:13 am, corkie said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:45 am, MichaelO said:

    Great video, MichaelO.

    The AARP woman starts the meeting by saying, ‘I think we can all agree that healthcare is unsustainable as is.’

    Immediately there are overwhelming shouts of, “No, we don’t agree!”

    She walks away.

    Some guy stands up and says;

    I’m 61 years old, and I was out pursuing the American dream with a family working 15 hours a day like everyone else, and voting – and that’s all I did – politically speaking.

    And all of a sudden, I woke up one day and I realized that the politicians we’ve been electing have been taking that dream away faster than I could get my hands on it. And it hasn’t just happened with Obama. He’s just a huge expansion of it.

    And now, it’s waking us all up.

    Does anyone NOT think that the democrats are grossly overplaying their hand?

  65. #65
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:13 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    The guy can’t keep his lies straight.

    “I take the same position if it is people on the left side of the spectrum who use such tactics as those on the right side.”

    Doesn’t he understand that this isn’t a left/right, Dem/Rep, lib/con issue? It is VOTERS who are showing up and protesting. Just look at Southside Barry’s polling numbers. Very, very few Americans support big government socialism and fewer still approve of cramdown legislation.

    It would help their cause if they showed up at these townhalls prepared for a substantive discussion rather than merely repeat the tired old partisan rhetoric. That is why they are getting shouted down. They just don’t listen.

  66. #66
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:24 am, moonsbreath said:

    That was a nice backtrack Lanny, but it won’t work. The arrogance of this chattering administration which clings to the playbook of Alinsky isn’t working. Go tell our Dear Leader and his minions that he’s awakened a sleeping giant.

  67. #67
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:24 am, happyscrapper said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am, ajmontana said: Happy, they did speak first, Nans talking points……. plus all the other crap the past year being said. friggin crapweasels all of em.

    True…but getting more videos of those lies being told at town hall meetings can’t hurt. Their lying mouths will do them in.

  68. #68
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:28 am, jdtruly said:

    In the spirit of cooperation and civility, I have sent a number of emails to flag@whitehouse.gov reporting a neighbor who I suspect of being 1/4 jewish, forwarding a propaganda email from the AARP along with a request for an extra rice ration coupon like they do in the PRC.

    I’m waiting for the next DNC email to send along. Somehow I’m doubtful they’ll get the message.

  69. #69
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:28 am, single stack said:

    Davis is a Clintonista. I expected him to deny saying what he clearly said.
    Lying crapweasel.

  70. #70
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:31 am, happyscrapper said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:06 am, theporch said:
    Judd Gregg said; he wouldn’t even put his dog on this program!

    Let alone his grandparents. Let’s not forget that if we are fortunately to live long enough we will all be in that category sooner or later.

    I am already in that category. I could be a posterperson for this revolt. I am a little “old” white-haired lady. I am very healthy and quite ambulatory. But I have my late Mother’s super deluxe walker on wheels in my garage and I can make myself look pretty feeble. I can show up at rallies with my walker and a sign that says…”My grandchidren love me. Please don’t kill me”. Or something like that. I am working on it.

  71. #71
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:33 am, theporch said:

    jd brought up the ‘snitch” site once again.
    Is everyone flooding that site with crap that the dems are putting out. I even sent Douglas her video back to her. Also sent a picture of Sheehan and asked them to forward it to Lanny. Just keep sending there own lies back to them until they shut this invasion of our privacy down.

  72. #72
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:34 am, Flyoverman said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:43 am, hunter said:

    I agree with your assessment. However, I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt in our reply.

    I cannot say that I trust him or REALLY know if he is sincere. He was the nightly chief apologist of Bill CLinton even after the scandal was fully revealed. He rationalized away China, Lewinsky, the FBI files; you name it. Oh I DO REMEMBER LANNY!

    However, by responding in a responsible manner we put him on the hook in the future to do what these enlightened posters said.

    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:49 am, AmericaFirst said:
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:04 am, Terri said:

    Liberals are intellectually dishonest, inconsistent and depend on people not having long term memories.

    His response put him on the hook for the future. Save it in a file labeled “Pearl Harbor” and when he contracdicts himself (he likely will) pull this response out and have at it. ;)

  73. #73
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:38 am, theporch said:

    Sounds great Happy. I also am a senior and have a 92 year old mother who drives and is sharp as can be and who I am worried about out living me. This crappy health plan the the dems wont take for themselves scares the hell out of me.
    fyi- I left the liberal aarp a long time ago. They have an agenda and it isn’t for their membership.

  74. #74
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:39 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Lanny Davis knows full well that the union and welfare thugs used by the Democrat Party constantly resort to violence and intimidation based on force. ((And, I wonder if Lanny will actually condemn violence when the Obama thugs injure some senior veteran or elderly grandmother attending a town hall protest.)

    Lanny’s contradictory statements in less than a day or two reflect the anguish that the socialist cabal is now feeling because of average Americans expressing their anger at the elected elite and their attempts to subjugate the American populace.

    Anyone with a brain knows that the town hall protests, unlike the ACORN and SEIU protests, aren’t paid for by anyone. Sure they are organized using websites so that individuals can schedule their time from work to go to such meetings.

    As far as Republican involvement, the Republican Party has been criticized far more than the Democrat Party because a lot of people feel betrayed by the “compassionate conservatism” that led to runaway government spending and ever bigger and intrusive government.

    What we are witnessing is a working middle-class people’s movement, and they are damned tired of being told what to do every time they turn around by a bunch of government bureaucrats and radical leftist politicians. President Reagan said “tear down this wall”. Well the people are now saying “tear down this government excess”.

  75. #75
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:40 am, Flyoverman said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 9:45 am, MichaelO said:

    Well, here are some of these dangerous types that need photographing: AARP rank and file giving grief to their (too young) ‘leadership’.

    AARP does not want to talk to my 92 year old mother on this issue. ;)

    The lioness still can bite!

  76. #76
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:41 am, theporch said:

    I would imagine the the ‘snitch’ site must have a rather large “junk/spam” file. My emails are probably going into one of those but that won’t stop me from sending more of there own lies as I have the time.

  77. #77
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:42 am, reshas1 said:

    I emailed him back asking him WHY nothing was EVER said during the Bush admin about the protests(and what was said about Bush, how Bush was treated). They are so hypocritical.

    Pelosi is in Denver today, 2pm Stout Street Clinic..

  78. #78
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:42 am, hunter said:

    However, by responding in a responsible manner we put him on the hook in the future to do what these enlightened posters said.

    With this I agree completely, but I still will not give the man any benifit of doubt. He has proven time and time again to be a liar and has not earned it with a single backtracking non-public statement.

  79. #79
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:52 am, theporch said:

    Being redundant , Lanny is a little fish.
    I have never cared for him and this only reinforces that opinion I have of him.
    Having said that, he does not have a vote and we need to concentrate on saving our freedoms and choices from obama. The dems know they must move as fast as they can and they have the votes.Don’t ever be mislead that they will not buy off these so called blue dog dems and get them to tag along. We can only hope to keep this up until 2010 and maybe we can undo what he is destroying. Remember their names and support those who run against them and share our own views of freedom and liberty.

  80. #80
    On August 6th, 2009 at 10:53 am, cheapseat said:

    mr davis; as you endorsed publicly violating citizen’s constitutional rights to free speech, i turned you in to the gestapo at the white house. raising your voice to your representative does not constitute unfree speech. pointing your finger at your congressperson and calling them a liar does not constitute unfree speech. following a weasel congressman out of his office and chanting “no to healthcare” does not constitute unfree speech. hitting a conservative speaker with a pie constitutes unfree speech, otherwise known as assault and battery. until you see these organized mobs commit an assault, STFU.

  81. #81
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, theporch said:

    Cornyn accuses White House of compiling ‘enemies list’

    12:00 AM CDT on Thursday, August 6, 2009

    You Texans have to love this guy. Keep him in office.
    Texas Sen. John Cornyn, accusing the White House of compiling an “enemies list,” has asked President Barack Obama to stop an effort to collect “fishy” information Americans see about a health care overhaul.

    Cornyn, who leads the Republicans’ Senate campaign effort, said Wednesday in a letter to Obama that he’s concerned that citizen engagement on the issue could be “chilled.”

  82. #82
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Flyoverman said:

    Hunter said:

    With this I agree completely, but I still will not give the man any benifit of doubt.

    HEH HEH HEH. You see Hunter I am a weasel, just like Lanny.

    I am giving his REPLY the benefit of the doubt. Him…… nope! ;)

  83. #83
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:09 am, hunter said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Flyoverman said:

    Got ya. But please do not demean yourself like that (just like Lanny) anymore it is not good for your mental health!

  84. #84
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:12 am, sassy745 said:

    I’m so glad I was courteous and thoughtful when I wrote him yesterday

  85. #85
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:13 am, theporch said:

    Hey Cornyn!!! No need to check if I am on that list. I know I am on the list that obama is keeping. But guess what, I am honored to be a snitch on the dems lies.

  86. #86
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:16 am, Flyoverman said:

    You know we need to start compiling a list of people we need to report to face@whitehouse.gov. Besides healthcare the Whitehouse needs to know our neighbors who are:

    gunowners
    SUV drivers
    obese
    who do not recycle
    with gas guzzlers
    who use plastic at the grocery
    veterans
    fly the American flag
    fly the POW/MIA flag
    are over 55 and are not in AARP
    have more than two children
    have a baby with birth defects
    use incandescent light bulbs
    attend an evangelical Chirstian Church
    are residents of care facilities
    have littered
    have anti Obama literature
    are registered Republicans
    are Libertatians
    are bankers
    put out more than one garbage sack a week
    doctors who prescribed tonsillectomies ofor your child
    listen to Rush, Sean, or Glenn
    watch Fox News
    grill with charcoal

    ………Additions?

  87. #87
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:19 am, Flyoverman said:

    OOOPS there are must adds to the list

    Non-whites who do not support Obama.

    WE WILL PROBABLY GET A REWARD FOR TURNING THEM IN!

  88. #88
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:19 am, theporch said:

    I watch Bo( not barack but O’reilly) less and less. If Glenn was on opposite of BO he would kill him. Bo(O’reilly) is becoming more and more less interesting and more and more wishywashy(sp?). He stopped taken any stands a cpl years ago.

  89. #89
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:22 am, TanyaB said:

    Ah yes, I too received the email from Lanny. It gave me such a warm cuddly feeling to know that Lanny was so concerned about all of us. And that he wasn’t going to immediatly turn over our names to Flag@whitehouse. He is so truthful and sensative to all of us. NOT!!!!!WHAT A PHONEY!!!

  90. #90
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:23 am, DesertLover said:

    My late father always said “there are 2 ways to tell someone to go to Hell … one way you just make them mad … the other way they look forward to the trip … so spend your time and efforts making them look forward to the trip” …

    I think that applies in this scenario … we must not lower ourselves to their level while at the same time standing up for our rights and for what is right for our country … in my view that simply means avoiding profanity laced tirades and signs … but still standing strong in our resolve to take back this country from those that would turn it into another socialist, third world experiment …

    These people are the epitome of the definition of insanity that talks of doing the same thing over and over and always expecting a different result …

    These people don’t accept that all of the times in history that these social systems have been tried and failed means anything because in their minds “they will do it better and it will work” …

    We can’t let them go for so much as another hour unchallenged … every minute waiting is a minute wasted that cannot be recovered in this battle for the survival of the United States of America …

  91. #91
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:26 am, metalhead said:

    Hey, Lannie:
    As the lefties like to say, citations, please. Where and when did you condemn the left for it’s inflammatory vitriol against Bush?

  92. #92
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:26 am, stillontheroad said:

    Flyoverman said:

    People that u8se Air Condioners
    People that Water their Lawn
    People that use pesticides on their Gardens
    People that have septic tanks
    People that have pets
    Families that have 2 cars or more
    Home Schoolers

  93. #93
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:31 am, Flyoverman said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:26 am, stillontheroad said:

    AWESOME. I wish my PC thought was that good!

    EVIL homeschoolers…….. yes!

  94. #94
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:34 am, theporch said:

    Lanny Davis, Attorney and Democratic strategist:

    The “shout downs” organized by the Republican right meet one of the classic definition of “fascist” tactics–defined as using shouting and disruption to deprive the civil and respectful debate of ideas. There is literally no defense to these tactics.
    Let’s have the media name names, publish photographs, and do interviews of those responsible for approving, even organizing these techniues. And let’s find an investigative journalist – are there many left – to prove these so-called grassroots shouters are, or are not, being paid.

  95. #95
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:44 am, Uplander said:

    Just had a laugh in relation to flag@whitehouse.gov. Remember Col. Flagg on MASH; The Army Intelligence officer?
    It’s good to see he’s found a home at the Whitehouse,eh?

  96. #96
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:44 am, JonB said:

    Flyoverman, Stillontheroad:

    Don’t forget:

    People who watch NASCAR
    People who smoke tobacco products
    People who use more than one sheet of toilet paper

  97. #97
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:47 am, happyscrapper said:

    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:44 am, JonB said:Don’t forget:

    People who watch NASCAR
    People who smoke tobacco products
    People who use more than one sheet of toilet paper

    Excellent! I LOVE it when people brainstorm! Especially people who actually have brains.

  98. #98
    On August 6th, 2009 at 11:47 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    Here is his email address: ldavis@orrick.com

  99. #99
    On August 6th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, Regulus said:

    Davis is a perfect example of what I call the liberal “Cognoscenti:” one of the few at the top who serves as a talking points leader for the Gliterati and the Ignorati to parrot.

    Just like Hope-a-Dope with his “Clinging to their Bibles and guns” crack about ordinary Americans, or Murtha’s assessment of his own constituents as “rednecks & racists” or Eric Holder’s wholesale tarring of the American People as “A nation of cowards” while he winks at Black Panther thugs intimidating voters on election day, from a liberal point of view the greatest faux pas that Davis committed was to let the mask slip where the Rubes could see it.

    I have become so thoroughly disgusted with the congenital dishonesty of the Cognoscenti, their deep contempt for the American People when they think no one is listening and their utterly unearned and patently false sense of moral and intellectual superiority that nothing they do or say surprises me anymore.

    I expect the lowest and the worst from them, and they never fail to deliver.

    So no, I don’t accept Davis’ non-apology “apology” because I know before even utters his first syllable that he doesn’t mean a single word of it. If he simply said, “I’m sorry… sorry I got caught — ha ha ha!” then I could believe him.

    Anything else is just another lie.

  100. #100
    On August 6th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, b-cat said:

    I’m with Regulus. I don’t accept your apology. You said what you said because you believe it.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Obama Chief of Staff: No More Compromise on Contraceptive Mandate

February 12, 2012 04:26 PM by Doug Powers

114 Comments

An offer they can’t refuse

Choosing Life and Beating the Odds

February 11, 2012 11:50 AM by Doug Powers

32 Comments

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments

CPAC vs. the Occupiers: Keep calm and carry silly string

February 9, 2012 10:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

How to Make a Liberal Politician Stand Up Against Intrusive Government

February 6, 2012 04:28 PM by Doug Powers

95 Comments

Mixed messages

The SIGA scandal: Calls for investigation mount

January 27, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments


Categories: Health care,Tea Party

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook