Revolt against AARP in Dallas: “Do you work for us or do we work for you?”
Watch the senior citizen “hooligans” and “civic vigilantes” in Dallas question a condescending AARP representative about Obamacare. Dues-paying members are speaking up about the organization’s sellout of its members — and the AARP brass is not happy. Yes, the winds of real hope and change are blowing:
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Obama’s fraudulent abortion mandate “accommodation” Updated: Prez condemns “cynical” opposition
February 10, 2012 10:05 AM by Michelle Malkin
233 Comments‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’
February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin
135 CommentsCPAC vs. the Occupiers: Keep calm and carry silly string
February 9, 2012 10:15 AM by Michelle Malkin
109 CommentsFormer Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage
February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers
74 CommentsHow to Make a Liberal Politician Stand Up Against Intrusive Government
February 6, 2012 04:28 PM by Doug Powers
95 CommentsYour Friday IRS regulation dump: Obamacare’s job-killing medical device tax
February 3, 2012 04:21 PM by Michelle Malkin
58 CommentsThe SIGA scandal: Calls for investigation mount
January 27, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin
58 Comments
Categories: Health care,Tea Party
Patterico
» Sockpuppet Friday (a la carte edition)



JustOneMinute
» Send Better BS
Hot Air
» Rumor of the day: New North Korean leader assassinated in Beijing; Update: Untrue, says U.S.
AmSpecBlog
» The Burke-Hayek Double Play Combo
Pundit & Pundette
» Obama's compromise is not a victory for religious liberty [updated]












John Stossel has a good editorial on some of these claims and points out that it’s not an honest discussion to make the “excluding the sick” claim for insurance.
Consider buying car insurance after you’ve been in an accident. That’s not the point of insurance.
We can debate the rising cost of health care, but to point at insurance companies as the single cause is a fallacy. As John notes, Medicare has a $36 trillion unfunded liability. Yet Obama-care supporters believe doing Medicare even bigger to support more people is sustainable?
Stossel’s article
That made me want to b*tch-slap the so-called AARP spokesperson into at least the middle of next week.
The left is trying to cram this through before more housing bad news hits after the September resets of the next wave of ARMs reset.
It is not news that this september and next September are both huge months for ARM resets. Both they both pale in comparison to the coming wave in 2011.
Just google ARM RESET CHART and look at he coming tidal wave of resets. While the 2010 and 2011 wave could be put off with restructuring the mortgage between now and then.
The 2009 wave is about to hit next month. Those folks can likely cancel christmas.
Don’t be fooled by these seemingly mild old folks.
Three women in the back row were knitting swastika mittens and tea cozies!
I think the “debate” on healthcare has wakened a creaky, arthritic giant and filled it with a terrible resolve.
Already cancelled our membership.
My theory on this is that AARP gets kickbacks from insurance companies, because they are the source for many policies generated from senior’s medicare supplemental insurance.
I think both AARP and AHIP are connected at the hip on this and both have been browbeaten by the administration into submission.
There is no other explanation for the health insurance industry to be cooperating by their silence that will lead to their eventual destruction… unless they are betting that the public option is not going to be successful.
The AARP is like any other big “advocacy” organization. As long as seniors keep blindly signing up and paying their membership dues, the leaders of the organization will push their own agendas. I used to be a member, but I didn’t renew this year, and I won’t again. Just like I no longer give to NPR (except through my taxes, where I have no choice.) The AARP leaders are being intentionally blind and ignoring the truth in order to get some changes in health care. When they say you can keep your own doctor if you want and keep your own insurance, that’s true in a limited way. Page 16 of the House bill states, however, that you will be grandfathered into your present care, and you cannot leave it once the law is enacted and then decide to come back to it. So literally, yes, you can keep your insurance, as long as nothing happens. But if something does, you can’t choose another private plan, you have to go with the public option. Download the bill and read it, and you’ll see that the scare stories are mostly true. Apply some common sense. How do you expand coverage when the population of care providers is constant, and not get into rationing? How do you actually reduce costs without affecting quality of care when the number covered is going up? Why do the “experts” that Obama relies on keep talking about bending the curve and limiting services to the young (under puberty) and the middle-aged to elderly (over 55)? Rahm Emmanuel’s brother is one who advocates that, and he has the president’s ear.
She was mean and nasty from the gitgo. The tape was obviously edited so I don’t know what was going on between but she had a stick up her griddle iron from the onset. The “we are leaving now” thing looked like a Obama/Democrat strategy that was put in place to counter the townhall meetings etc from becoming a forum to criticise the people holding them and let the speakers know what the people think.
Look for more Democrats leaving the meetings with a “I came here to discuss and they just wanted to shout me down” explanation. That way, they are not wrong, the people are disrespectful. Don’t think the Obama team has not put out a memo to that effect already.
I would love to know if AARP has any official comment about this event. I would also be quite surprised as I believe them to be self-interested cowards.
I passed 50 some years ago and have been receiving their junk mail for some years. I throw it away before even leaving the post office (I use a PO box).
+Photi
From Michelles Phoning it in blog post
There, it is already happening and they act like it’s not a grand scheme to do this. No I just came up with it all by myself. BS, it is a coordinated strategic response.
I gave up on AARP when they put Katie Couric’s picture on the cover of its magazine. Ever since I stuff their business envelopes with trash mail and send them in. It makes me feel better and helps the Postal Service.
God bless you Michelle. Stay well, it’s going to be a long hard battle.
Geez, that lady has liberal bent written all over her. In any company I have ever worked, an attitude like that toward your CUSTOMERS would have you out he door by the end of the day with an apology issued as well. Like all organizations, their original and noble cause of ensuring their constituency is heard has now moved into the existing for the sake of existing stage. Everything the org does now is to ensure the relevancy and survival of that orgnization. Even at the expense of the group they speak for. See NAACP, SPLC, MADD, ACLU, etc. They must continually search for new issues to reamin relevant. Even if is is a nonexistant issue. MADD won’t stop until all acohol is banned in the US. Then they will find anohter issue. The NAACP will not stop until no white person is left to blame for their ills. And on and on.
I added video from last night’s Hannity Exclusive Imus Ranch Special.
Here’s what the 60 Plus Association has to say about the AARP:
http://www.60plus.org/about-aarp.asp