I guess I can call him a gutless Obama licker.

Some of us attempt to approach your claims in good faith and if this is how you react why should we take you seriously?

Salt, you and Corkie routinely hand the collective of posters (aka, the “Agents”) who comment under the handle of LGM their hats. I am amazed and impressed by the eloquence and command of facts you both use to shut down the LGM collective’s attempts at obfuscation and distraction; they seldom respond because they can’t – the facts are not on their side.

Just ignore their rants and ramblings because, if they were serious, why would they post on a conservative site? Why not start their own blog?

Or should I say “bok, bok, bok?”

On August 18th, 2009 at 7:02 pm, lgm said:

Dimsdale said (#90):

I answered several of your comments with citations.

Please have the grace to respond.

Your comments are too scrambled to answer seriously. For example, you posted (#82):

Have the decency to admit that insurance companies already limit (ration) health care.

So Obamacare would have unlimited health care coverage for all citizens…?

Which is the opposite of what I said, and what the proposals are. Part of health care reform has to be sensible limits on hearth care. Anti reformers say that this amounts to rationing — which it does. I’m pointing out that this is both unavoidable (nobody has an infinite health care budget) and a pre-extisting condition (we have it already).

Nice of you to pick the one snarky remark of mine. I can currently change insurance companies if I choose. I can’t change a government option.

Now address my other responses in entry #82, particularly the ones were I cite specific sources that refute your assertions.