<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Hair-raising: More hard-hitting MSM coverage of Michelle Obama</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-792529</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Hair-raising: More hard-hitting MSM coverage of Michelle Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-792529</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week, the tough-nosed MSM dug deep to uncover the scandal of Michelle Obama&#8217;s shorts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week, the tough-nosed MSM dug deep to uncover the scandal of Michelle Obama&#8217;s shorts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-788124</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-788124</guid>
		<description>Cyberspace ate my first response...
Atheling, 
  Can you really look at the &quot;physical appearance&quot; posts about male versus female political players and honestly tell me they are the same in quantity and tone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyberspace ate my first response&#8230;<br />
Atheling,<br />
  Can you really look at the &#8220;physical appearance&#8221; posts about male versus female political players and honestly tell me they are the same in quantity and tone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overexposed &#38; Overhyped: Too Much Obama in Prime-Time &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-787768</link>
		<dc:creator>Overexposed &#38; Overhyped: Too Much Obama in Prime-Time &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-787768</guid>
		<description>[...]  Michelle Malkin: So much for the Greatest Transition in World History and And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama and “All wee-weed up” and nowhere to go I&#8217;m Sick of Obama: Some people love Obama in an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Michelle Malkin: So much for the Greatest Transition in World History and And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama and “All wee-weed up” and nowhere to go I&#8217;m Sick of Obama: Some people love Obama in an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Family at the Grand Canyon &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-787659</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Family at the Grand Canyon &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-787659</guid>
		<description>[...] Frugal Caf&#233; Blog Zone: News That Isn’t News: Michelle Obama’s Shorts Michelle Malkin: And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama Needs of the Many: Media Completely Manufactures Outrage Over Michelle Obama’s Shorts Dvorak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frugal Caf&eacute; Blog Zone: News That Isn’t News: Michelle Obama’s Shorts Michelle Malkin: And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama Needs of the Many: Media Completely Manufactures Outrage Over Michelle Obama’s Shorts Dvorak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US: Hope Gone; Change Left, Racism to Stay&#8230; — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786679</link>
		<dc:creator>US: Hope Gone; Change Left, Racism to Stay&#8230; — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786679</guid>
		<description>[...] And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GJCorby</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786426</link>
		<dc:creator>GJCorby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786426</guid>
		<description>...time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GJCorby</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786425</link>
		<dc:creator>GJCorby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786425</guid>
		<description>Here is another Obama first, the first President activly seeking the destroy both the United States and capitalism at the same .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another Obama first, the first President activly seeking the destroy both the United States and capitalism at the same .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbw999</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786373</link>
		<dc:creator>sbw999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786373</guid>
		<description>It is a perfect statement...of her obvious contempt for her Country.    Dems, one by one, have torn down every worthwhile tradition in this Country since the 1960&#039;s.  This is just one more.  What a class act.   Yeeech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a perfect statement&#8230;of her obvious contempt for her Country.    Dems, one by one, have torn down every worthwhile tradition in this Country since the 1960&#8242;s.  This is just one more.  What a class act.   Yeeech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nice Shorts Michelle! &#171; Jim Blazsik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786348</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice Shorts Michelle! &#171; Jim Blazsik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786348</guid>
		<description>[...] And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama By Michelle Malkin  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle Obama By Michelle Malkin  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIAMI RALLY AGAINST OBAMACARE &#8211; 8/22/09 (thousands came) &#171; FactReal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786301</link>
		<dc:creator>MIAMI RALLY AGAINST OBAMACARE &#8211; 8/22/09 (thousands came) &#171; FactReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786301</guid>
		<description>[...] Letterman’s latest publicity stunt: You’re the TalibanLetter from a Whole Foods worker UpdatedAnd now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle ObamaCorporate Shills for Hope and ChangeThe bottom line on Tom Ridge: WeaselACLU/Gitmo jihadi lawyers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Letterman’s latest publicity stunt: You’re the TalibanLetter from a Whole Foods worker UpdatedAnd now for some hard-hitting reporting on Michelle ObamaCorporate Shills for Hope and ChangeThe bottom line on Tom Ridge: WeaselACLU/Gitmo jihadi lawyers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atheling</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786286</link>
		<dc:creator>atheling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786286</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On August 21st, 2009 at 8:48 pm, NestingHawk said: 
How can you possibly talk like this about every female public figure and wonder why more women tend to vote Democrat? Is there a pathological fear of female thighs going around?
It’s not any more mature when you discuss Michael Moore’s weight problem, but the women definitely get targeted more, on more threads than I care to count. There’s nothing wrong with the way Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton or Janet Reno look, and even if there were, why would you waste so much time picking at it? Just have to let every female Democratic voter who might switch to Republican know that all the stereotypes are true and conservatives think of women only as decoration?
Or do you just want conservative women who may have the traits you pick on in equal or greater measure to be repulsed by your behavior?
Sure, argue about whether that’s appropriate attire for Air Force One or not. Etiquette, protocol, diplomacy, whatever. But when you start claiming she’s fat or saying she looks like a man, you are the ones who look…I’m going to be polite here and say “bad.” And you may want to get your vision checked.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Chill.  We make fun of Obama whenever his glistening pecs appear.

We&#039;re equal opportunity gender bashers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On August 21st, 2009 at 8:48 pm, NestingHawk said:<br />
How can you possibly talk like this about every female public figure and wonder why more women tend to vote Democrat? Is there a pathological fear of female thighs going around?<br />
It’s not any more mature when you discuss Michael Moore’s weight problem, but the women definitely get targeted more, on more threads than I care to count. There’s nothing wrong with the way Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton or Janet Reno look, and even if there were, why would you waste so much time picking at it? Just have to let every female Democratic voter who might switch to Republican know that all the stereotypes are true and conservatives think of women only as decoration?<br />
Or do you just want conservative women who may have the traits you pick on in equal or greater measure to be repulsed by your behavior?<br />
Sure, argue about whether that’s appropriate attire for Air Force One or not. Etiquette, protocol, diplomacy, whatever. But when you start claiming she’s fat or saying she looks like a man, you are the ones who look…I’m going to be polite here and say “bad.” And you may want to get your vision checked.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chill.  We make fun of Obama whenever his glistening pecs appear.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re equal opportunity gender bashers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristy Li</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786113</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristy Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786113</guid>
		<description>Oh, all you haters out there...
 
You &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; that her outfit is the pinnacle of fashion.  No one can look better than she.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, all you haters out there&#8230;</p>
<p>You <em>know</em> that her outfit is the pinnacle of fashion.  No one can look better than she.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offhanded</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786062</link>
		<dc:creator>Offhanded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786062</guid>
		<description>I can understand the substantive dismantling of Michelle-my-belle Obama,...but her shorts?,...why should I care about her shorts?. I must be missing something.I hope I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the substantive dismantling of Michelle-my-belle Obama,&#8230;but her shorts?,&#8230;why should I care about her shorts?. I must be missing something.I hope I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786042</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786042</guid>
		<description>Corkie, 
   Yeah, I can see where the sarcasm, and some other things that would have been indicated by tone in real life, didn&#039;t get across. Thanks for the constructive criticism, Corkie. I mean that. 
And that last point-quite agreed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corkie,<br />
   Yeah, I can see where the sarcasm, and some other things that would have been indicated by tone in real life, didn&#8217;t get across. Thanks for the constructive criticism, Corkie. I mean that.<br />
And that last point-quite agreed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerLady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/and-now-for-some-hard-hitting-reporting-on-michelle-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-786002</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=32953#comment-786002</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this the trailer park trash Clinton was talking about?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can dress her up in $100 a pair denim shorts but she&#039;s still a pig with lipstick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is this the trailer park trash Clinton was talking about?</p></blockquote>
<p>You can dress her up in $100 a pair denim shorts but she&#8217;s still a pig with lipstick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

