Get Paul Sperry’s book “Infiltration” for more on that! Chapter 27.

Hard to know who to believe on this one. The guy trying to sell a book, or a guy trying to get re elected.

If such demands become routine, your conscious begins to bite and you become resentful.

When the stress is unbearable from such unethical working condition, you either blow the whistle on your boss, OR quit your job.

The S-hole Tom Ridge did neither between 2001 and 2005.

He is an opportunist and selfish Roach.

He is assured of appearances on the TV circuit for a couple of weeks and some glowing reviews from the news papers nobody is reading anymore.

The book is destined to be on Worst Flop List.

Why, you ask?

Because public school educated Lefties are not interested in reading any books.
Liberal elites KNOW IT ALL, they don’t need to read anything.
If these groups liked to read books, Pelosi and Boxer would both be on the Best Seller list with their recent master pieces.

On August 21st, 2009 at 6:25 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

On August 21st, 2009 at 12:08 pm, lgm said:

OK, Ridge is a weasel, but he’s the best of the Bush administration. At least lying about the terrorism threat to win elections bothered him a little.

So now because Ridge comes out with this Bush tell-all, suddenly he’s the “best of the Bush administration”??? You’re nothing but a TPM sycophant and have no thoughts of your own.

I believe the Soviets called them “useful idiots”. I suspect the heads of the Democrat party do likewise.

On August 21st, 2009 at 12:08 pm, lgm said:

OK, Ridge is a weasel, but he’s the best of the Bush administration. At least lying about the terrorism threat to win elections bothered him a little.

So now because Ridge comes out with this Bush tell-all, suddenly he’s the “best of the Bush administration”??? You’re nothing but a TPM sycophant and have no thoughts of your own.

On August 21st, 2009 at 1:39 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

On August 21st, 2009 at 1:01 pm, Dimsdale said:

Do you think Obama politicized the war? The Democrats in general?

Do I think Obama has jeopardized the mission and put our troops’ lives at risk in order to save face?

Ha ha. Next time you want to avoid answering a question, don’t repeat the question immediately prior to NOT answering it.

On August 21st, 2009 at 3:51 pm, chapoutier said:
What I find fascinating is that you lean toward the “Politcal purposes and not Book hype” side of things here
Ummmm, actually I don’t. The closest thing I said was that this system opened itself up to charges of being manipulated for political purposes.

I guess I inferred you leaned that way, because your response to flyoverman only mentioned the possibility of political abuse and not anything about possibility of book hype. My mistake.

What I find fascinating is that you lean toward the “Politcal purposes and not Book hype” side of things here

Ummmm, actually I don’t. The closest thing I said was that this system opened itself up to charges of being manipulated for political purposes.

On August 21st, 2009 at 1:51 pm, love2rumba said:
Don’t be selectively ignorant.

I was unaware that option was available to him.

On August 21st, 2009 at 1:39 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

As opposed to them pumping a new strategy before the elections, and being accused of “politicizing the war” once again?

Do you think Obama politicized the war? The Democrats in general?

Do I think Obama has jeopardized the mission and put our troops’ lives at risk in order to save face? No.

So his insistence that the highly successful surge didn’t jeopardize any lives, presuming, of course, that he could have persuaded more experienced senators of his wrongheaded assumption?

By the way, has he caught Osama bin laden yet? I am just asking because we were told that it was achievable when Bush was president, but he didn’t want to do it…